Entanglement

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.ค. 2017
  • MIT 8.04 Quantum Physics I, Spring 2016
    View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/8-04S16
    Instructor: Barton Zwiebach
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu

ความคิดเห็น • 151

  • @dkg4975
    @dkg4975 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    I am doing my Bachelor's degree in Computer Science but can't stop watching Physics' videos from MIT.
    These videos are just too good !!!

    • @navjotsingh2251
      @navjotsingh2251 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      These lectures will help you with quantum computing, if you take that at your university it will help to know some quantum mechanics.

    • @MrHan-is1ko
      @MrHan-is1ko 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I'm doing the exact opposite. Wish the current university system would't be so rigid in terms of courses you have to take.

    • @paulg444
      @paulg444 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      change majors

    • @darthsabbath57
      @darthsabbath57 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm taking a Quantum Computing grad class right now, and this guy is everything. He makes this so much easier to understand. I wish I'd majored in physics :'(

  • @jjkj8421
    @jjkj8421 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Everyone forget alice and bob's contribution over 100 years for 2022 nobel prize🙂.

  • @ephipi
    @ephipi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    It's to bad the Nobel Prize is not awarded posthumously. John Bell certainly deserves one.

  • @p.s.design4338
    @p.s.design4338 7 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    So good lectures, I just cannot stop watching!

  • @jazirmohammed608
    @jazirmohammed608 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    7:18 “This state is un-fuck-torizable”

    • @bustercam199
      @bustercam199 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      lol, I noticed that too.

  • @Trilobita98
    @Trilobita98 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    As a computer engineering student, entanglement kinda reminds me of flip flop circuits in computer science where the output of one NAND gate is used as the input of the other and vice versa

    • @frun
      @frun 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check what spin conservation means. There are 5 of them.

  • @ammaeaar
    @ammaeaar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This is way better than watching a movie, way more interesting.

  • @En-of5oh
    @En-of5oh 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The explanation is so good, no complications, al grano.

  • @MKEditsxx
    @MKEditsxx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is a good simple way to explain entagled states
    I was struggling grabbing the concept of it and this lecture helped a lot :)

  • @joemunene
    @joemunene 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the initiative. World class Professor.

  • @ankanghosal
    @ankanghosal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful lecture

  • @chasr1843
    @chasr1843 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation of tensor product

  • @physicsboy3108
    @physicsboy3108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing sir Barton Zweibach ♥️♥️♥️

  • @zack_120
    @zack_120 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

    6:10- Based on what is said (particle 1 and particle 2) the subscripts to the parentheses should be u and v, instead of 1 and 2 as written, respectively.

  • @hackm494
    @hackm494 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Will trynna figure out what jada did with august :

  • @kibitokjustus8013
    @kibitokjustus8013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great sir ,, continue to inspire young physicist like us ,, thank you , kindly can ask for notes for " solid state physics "

  • @kushagr7132
    @kushagr7132 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    2:15 this is the best lacture ever
    He is so focused on the subject
    That his animal instincts are in auto mode 😂

  • @_oubliette
    @_oubliette 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This lecture was fantastic
    7:16

  • @simonphoenix2563
    @simonphoenix2563 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    searched for that jada and will love,but i evetually started to watch this

  • @anteconfig5391
    @anteconfig5391 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like this video. I recently heard of the zeno effect and now I'm wondering how that would work in an entangled state.
    Could bob use the zeno effect to measure alice's environment without breaking the entanglement?

  • @royphilip3964
    @royphilip3964 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good stuff..

  • @dinmohammad8156
    @dinmohammad8156 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice way to describe Entanglement.

  • @surendrakverma555
    @surendrakverma555 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent lecture Sir. Thanks 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😊🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @JaskaranSingh-io8uj
    @JaskaranSingh-io8uj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing lecture bdw

  • @bustercam199
    @bustercam199 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Bell only showed that the particles did not have a fixed state before the measurement but was incorrect in asserting that his inequality rules out locality or realism. It does not.

  • @williamlavallee8916
    @williamlavallee8916 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Pushes the boundaries of thinking, very nice. Though first mistake is I don't think particles "fly" around or that there is a limit to entanglement. More likely it's the bane of all theorists, everything is coupled.

  • @anishgade4050
    @anishgade4050 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is addictive.

  • @absolutGMG
    @absolutGMG 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wish If all my teachers were like this prof

  • @JasonScottLucas
    @JasonScottLucas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mind blown

  • @brandomiranda6703
    @brandomiranda6703 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Where do they explain mathematically and intuitively what this tensor product does? I guess mathematically i know its just matrix multiplication such that one produces a rank 1 matrix but why was that the definition chosen for whatever intuitive operation this tensor product is trying to do? Why tensor product?

    • @justinp8044
      @justinp8044 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      tensor product operates in hilbert space, which has a real-valued norm. it also scales dimension. Given a 2-d, orthonormal basis:
      x=[1,0]^T and y=[0,1]^T
      where ^T is transpose of vectors
      then the tensor product of x and y gives a vector z = [0,1,0,0] ^T which is 4-d. That's how groups of entangled qubits can hold exponentially more data.

  • @SenorQuichotte
    @SenorQuichotte 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    you can't determine the system if you know the subsystem. if you can't determine the components if you know the system. the measure of either quanity increases the complexity such that the other quanity cannot be determined.

  • @bustercam199
    @bustercam199 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If entanglement is real, then one should be able to use it for communication....But, a measurement on photon A only "collapses" the wavefunction at A and not B. That's the reason why it is not useful for communication and not the standard interpretation of the results being random.

  • @mkasera3020
    @mkasera3020 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where does entanglement exist in physical world. How it is achieved?

  • @Luh-SC
    @Luh-SC 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jada????

  • @justinp8044
    @justinp8044 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can nature superposition an entangled state AB, with an unentangled photon C to create a new superposition state ABC....in general can you superposition an arbitrary number of states? As in measuring photon C in up results in AB in up-down, and measuring photon C in down results in AB in down-up, respectively?

    • @brandomiranda6703
      @brandomiranda6703 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Justin P why not? Cant one do tensor products of 3 vectors if you want? It gives a order 3 tensor but mathematically it seems a well defined operation.

    • @hadlevick
      @hadlevick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Justin P The polydynamics of the movement generates pseudo-autonomy as material property, of the autogenous phenomenon; existing.(...) as you said?

    • @hadlevick
      @hadlevick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Justin P I use (//)

    • @hadlevick
      @hadlevick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a honor to meet you living being...

    • @hadlevick
      @hadlevick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fluid theory (Reproduction/Feed/Reasoning) decanted selfover hexagon...

  • @ritvikraina84
    @ritvikraina84 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    7:19 "this state is unFUCKter..isable"
    I don't know prof. if it was intentional but it made me laugh out loud.

    • @joesmith8288
      @joesmith8288 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      THIS STATE IS UNFUCKED..tarizable

    • @balahaasdf2219
      @balahaasdf2219 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Laughed out loud as well. Right after that: "this is a funny state". Right. The state is funny. Great stuff :)

  • @Blue_Azure101
    @Blue_Azure101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I get heart palpitations from this thinking about the exam I have bombed

  • @_DD_15
    @_DD_15 6 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    This John Bell destroyed Einstein Ha Ha

    • @soumyaadhikari9842
      @soumyaadhikari9842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You know less about Quantum Mechanics.And read Bell's statements even after his theory. He
      said There may be more on Entanglement which Einstein implied

    • @_DD_15
      @_DD_15 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@soumyaadhikari9842 ever heard of sarcasm? 🤔

    • @soumyaadhikari9842
      @soumyaadhikari9842 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@_DD_15 Okay I didn't get your sarcasm.Can you elaborate on what you are saying?

    • @Labroidas
      @Labroidas 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@_DD_15 I don't think sarcasm means what you think it means bro

  • @kingsandassociates7176
    @kingsandassociates7176 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    7:19....'un what'???

    • @MrDroenix
      @MrDroenix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Came to the comments to see if anyone else picked up on that, gave me a good laugh

  • @iwonakozlowska6134
    @iwonakozlowska6134 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mathematically , it all fits , but does it physically make sense? Either everything is entangled or nothing.

  • @syafsmith5085
    @syafsmith5085 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I bet Jada Pinkett Smith is interested in this lecture.

    • @naz6736
      @naz6736 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      hahahah

    • @softwarephil1709
      @softwarephil1709 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      She’s busy practicing superposition.

    • @diraceq
      @diraceq 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      3 years later and this comment still has aged like fine wine

    • @jazirmohammed608
      @jazirmohammed608 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Underrated comment

    • @peterparler3246
      @peterparler3246 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Will Smith: “don’t f**king talk about my wife. SLAP!”

  • @pramodkharel2082
    @pramodkharel2082 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wave function of this lecture has collapsed at 7:29 minutes. lol

  • @samratmitra9406
    @samratmitra9406 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    spooky action at a distance

    • @stephenanastasi748
      @stephenanastasi748 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Spooky action at a distance makes an assumption that the world as we perceive it is the same as it actually is. But the previous lectures show quite clearly that this is not the case. Consider the lecture that has a single photon going 'up' and 'down' at the same time, then interfering with itself. This can't happen if the world is as we describe it to be and ignore that it could be otherwise.

  • @lilowens4682
    @lilowens4682 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    4m 4th circled squared.

  • @joshuasukup2488
    @joshuasukup2488 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How did he determine that alpha1 times beta 2 is 0. These are magnitudes with direction shouldnt they multiply into a positive non zero? Or is he simply assuming that the sum has to add up to 2?

  • @bustercam199
    @bustercam199 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The effect is not instantaneous, but very fast.

  • @roundedges2
    @roundedges2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When you take a measurement, you lift the curtain on something that was always there but just could not be determined until measurement lifts the curtain on either particle. They were destined to be in those states at the moment of entanglement--NOT at the moment of measurement. The indeterminate "all possibilities" state was just seeming that way due to the curtain of non-measurement obscuring the fact of inherent all-along state

    • @joepierson3859
      @joepierson3859 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      that's a classical solution, it fails in practice

  • @sohamsau8775
    @sohamsau8775 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ooo oooo ooo yeah !!!!

  • @sywaddr11
    @sywaddr11 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What if u1, u2, v1, v2 has different chemistry state?

    • @vedanshi4312
      @vedanshi4312 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't think this would happen it's on a very low level like photon and that's why they are spinning and it doesn't matter what chemical state they have..

  • @dikshakumari4286
    @dikshakumari4286 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can entangled pairs affect on time

  • @qurbanhussaini3542
    @qurbanhussaini3542 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can download your videos with sub title

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The captions are available on MIT OpenCourseWare at ocw.mit.edu/8-04S16 and in our collection on the Internet Archive at archive.org/details/MIT8.04S16/.

  • @chiragkshatriya9486
    @chiragkshatriya9486 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, what if they measure the spin of the particle simultaneously?

    • @frun
      @frun 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Theoretically it shouldn't depend of the timing(the math is such), but who knows. Also there are uncertainty relations in qm.

  • @hadlevick
    @hadlevick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to measure multidimensionaly?

  • @aaronstibeljr2584
    @aaronstibeljr2584 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does Jada Smith TA this class?

  • @optionmaster221
    @optionmaster221 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    we live in a simulated universe, if you can accept it - suddenly everything else in universe becomes explainable, from quantum weirdness to gravity, time and the speed of light limit, from unexplainable 100 decimal places number that sets this universe to be just right for formation of stars planets and life to unbelievable complexity of the human brain .. everything..

  • @kamalgamer3213
    @kamalgamer3213 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who cannot afford for university,here you can gather your knowledge ❤❤❤

  • @marinadelrey5512
    @marinadelrey5512 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please forgive me for being so petty, but I can't help but to imagine Gru giving this lecture. I'm so ashamed of myself. 🙈😂

  • @ilhantezel6125
    @ilhantezel6125 ปีที่แล้ว

    Total angular momentum of the universe should be zero, so once this particles are created, they should be always opposite to each other otherwise nonzero angular momentum of the universe appears,can this explain entanglement?

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Angular momentum is only conserved if the background is both empty and flat. A sugar solution does, for instance, not conserve angular momentum. Neither does a magnetic field and you can bet your life on it that parallel transport in curved spacetime also changes it.

    • @joshuasukup2488
      @joshuasukup2488 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      So if my "ship" is rotating clockwise and turns 180 degrees now I am counterclockwise when compared to my initial position, non conserved through rotation assuming s fixed frame of reference.

  • @hakuei7530
    @hakuei7530 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where is Jada Pinkett?

  • @qualquan
    @qualquan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    confused lecture
    did not emphasize that the 2 entangled or connected half particles have a single wave function and hence equals a single whole particle
    also doesn't know that communication is between different particles and never within the same particle

    • @brandomiranda6703
      @brandomiranda6703 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      what does this mean?

    • @39mdg92
      @39mdg92 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There's no such thing as half particles, only subcomponents of a quantum system. The states he's describing for superpositioned or even entangled quantum states are wave functions that describe the whole system, composed of the superpositions of the pure state wave functions of the subcomponents.
      Seems more like a case of confused listener.

  • @Ai-he1dp
    @Ai-he1dp 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Is that how jesus managed to preach in many different places at the same time?...was it a type of quantum entanglement?....what an interesting lecture, the mans handwriting is an art and his style is part philosophical, is that a type of entanglement too?

  • @gabor6259
    @gabor6259 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The mathematical description blew me away! What I don't understand though, is why there are only entangled pairs and not entangled triplets or quadruplets.

    • @harmansingh-tj2cf
      @harmansingh-tj2cf 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      These exist

    • @hectormartinpenapollastri8431
      @hectormartinpenapollastri8431 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can have as many entangled particles as you want. But determining if a particular state is entangled or not is very hard for more than 2 particles states (this is an open problem, to make an algorithm to determine this).

  • @hadlevick
    @hadlevick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simultaneity as unicity...

  • @oscaraguilar6906
    @oscaraguilar6906 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sigo sin entender esta madre

  • @jayakrishnaus8737
    @jayakrishnaus8737 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One way to prove quantum entanglement is by assuming that matter creation is happend instantaneously.
    So, every quantum states will behave like a synchronized clock to maintain total angular momentum zero

  • @user-zj9qm6mb5k
    @user-zj9qm6mb5k 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can I understand |u1>, |u2>, Iv1>, |v2> is some specific form of | ψ> ? Anyone please😂

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can understand them as specific vectors of a vector space.

  • @manularajintha9377
    @manularajintha9377 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Einstein Relativity s relevant for the three-dimensional space whom we know.

  • @sumeetsharma7256
    @sumeetsharma7256 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the entanglement operator

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe seeing the earlier videos might help you. Here is the playlist: th-cam.com/video/jANZxzetPaQ/w-d-xo.htmlsi=vxYg8cX6ogfu7wWi. You can also find course materials on MIT OpenCourseWare at: ocw.mit.edu/8-04S16. Best wishes on your studies!

  • @farhadmodaresi4182
    @farhadmodaresi4182 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7:17 I have a dirty mind

  • @JuanGarcia-zy8yw
    @JuanGarcia-zy8yw หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing lector idk wtf he said thou 😩😀😂

  • @StephenGillie
    @StephenGillie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's only not transmitting information because you're uncreative. What if the measurement were the outcome of a bet? You get 10,000 galactic credits if it measures UP in the galactic casino. And at the galactic casino satellite, they have an entangled particle - if it measures DOWN, you get 10,000 galactic credits. Place your bets, as your location doesn't matter to win!

  • @jackbidnik9642
    @jackbidnik9642 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The very existence of the Pauli Exclusion Principle implies, insists, there is entanglement.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, and the Pauli Exclusion principle is a direct consequence of relativity. More precisely, one can derive quantum mechanics entirely from relativity and Kolmogorov's axioms for ensembles of independent systems.

    • @jackbidnik9642
      @jackbidnik9642 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lepidoptera9337 You mean I'm right? I get butterflies every time I think of it!

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jackbidnik9642 I meant that you made a lucky guess. ;-)

    • @jackbidnik9642
      @jackbidnik9642 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lepidoptera9337 Wonderful news about PEP and Kolmogorov's synthesis of relativity and QM. So there's no further need to search fo the TOE? By the way, I know somebody named Pat, that Kolmogorov could buy a vowel or two from.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jackbidnik9642 Awh, you are so cute when you are feeling sorry for yourself. We had the theory of everything since 1630, by the way. Can you guess what I am referring to? ;-)

  • @lilowens4682
    @lilowens4682 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    U do need a strong com.tech.(ers)

  • @foobarbecue
    @foobarbecue 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    SMH @ using u and v and writing them so they look exactly the same

    • @stephenanastasi748
      @stephenanastasi748 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They don't look the same at all to me. Watch the right hand serif.

    • @foobarbecue
      @foobarbecue 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stephenanastasi748 That's actually helpful, thanks.

    • @stephenanastasi748
      @stephenanastasi748 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@foobarbecue Your welcome. I just wish the rest of it were as easy. Good stuff, though.

  • @zanymany9995
    @zanymany9995 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What does |x> notation denote? Vector?

  • @A1_2221
    @A1_2221 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is alpa nd beta

    • @joshuasukup2488
      @joshuasukup2488 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Coefficients whose squares summed equal one for u and the same for v. They are the sin and cos of the initial u and v vectors

  • @saikatmaji5159
    @saikatmaji5159 ปีที่แล้ว

    why does such an entangled state exist?

    • @hectormartinpenapollastri8431
      @hectormartinpenapollastri8431 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It can be constructed and measured. Basically some systems naturally evolve non entangled states in entangled ones, and we use that to construct these weird states

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because conservation laws exist.

  • @ctr1502
    @ctr1502 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @7:18 lol

  • @nibussss
    @nibussss 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like to host phycists in India...
    I have a flat...we can work on some things....
    Out of interest of course ..
    Who knows.....the possibilities are endless

  • @JaskaranSingh-io8uj
    @JaskaranSingh-io8uj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It conflicts theory of relativity

    • @quantumspin385
      @quantumspin385 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      actually it doesn't and here's why;
      Here's a better explanation of quantum spin.
      th-cam.com/video/YyZHmnmFjwE/w-d-xo.html
      and a better explanation of entanglement
      th-cam.com/video/7nSeP9RDr4Q/w-d-xo.html
      Have a look please leave a comment let me know what you thought

  • @tristanmacc
    @tristanmacc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:15 no... this state is unfuc-

  • @abdullahimohamed1065
    @abdullahimohamed1065 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Phisics in first class1

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Entanglement", another label for eternal existence in the time duration timing modulation interval of zero-infinity, Eternity-now at the omnidirectional-dimensional Origin of Superspin-symmetry, Superposition-point Singularity, reciprocal-resonance imaging positioning, here-now-forever.
    This lecture provides the format and terminology that identifies the principles Mathematically.
    "Particle" => equivalent geometrical/frequency alignment infinitesimal in the Conformal Cyclical Cosmological Constant of continuous creation connection, the Principle of e-Pi-i reciprocal-resonance sync-sequence imaging.., => basis of Group Theory. (?)
    Pictorial analysis of Turbulence such as has been done by "Smarter Every Day" helps form a combined Math-Physics Intuition.

  • @SushilRam77
    @SushilRam77 ปีที่แล้ว

    You just have trust the equation. I can't do that.. since real science is based on science. I know we dont have science a space station. How do it we experiment?

    • @joepierson3859
      @joepierson3859 ปีที่แล้ว

      You don't have to trust the equation experiments have proved entanglement many times.
      You can buy a kit and do the experiments yourself at home it cost a couple thousand though.

  • @csaracho2009
    @csaracho2009 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ha ha Nobody asks questions?

  • @meetghelani5222
    @meetghelani5222 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    💀

  • @lilowens4682
    @lilowens4682 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is false math do not follow..

  • @joefromzohra
    @joefromzohra ปีที่แล้ว

    The two particles are entangled because they are the result of a conservation law. So there is no weirdness and no spooky action at a distance. See my detailed explanation at: vixra.org/pdf/1608.0350v1.pdf