VPC Lecture 7 (HSRP and VPC) CCIE 57391

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
  • In this section you will learn:
    Behavior of HSRP/VRRP with VPC
    Control plane and forwarding plane behavior of HSRP in VPC domain
    HSRP object tracking and VPC
    Traffic flow in a HSRP and VPC environment.
    #CISCONEXUS​​#CCIE​​#VPC

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @nooruzzaman5358
    @nooruzzaman5358 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very well explained, Thanks for your good work.

  • @naveenkumar5085
    @naveenkumar5085 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very Good Explanation Sir, Easy to understand

  • @naveenkumar5085
    @naveenkumar5085 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sir, Is loop avoidance not applicable to control plane traffic ? As shown the lecture when N5K-2 sends an ARP request for the G-MAC due to the HASING if N7K-1 receives the ARP request from VPC Members ports and as it secondary device it will process the request and it will forward to the N7K-2 via peer link. N7K-2 Will process the ARP request and will reply to N5K-2 which is again VPC Member ports. So as per Loop avoidance when ever traffic is received from the VPC Member ports and sent over Peer link the same will not egress to VPC Members ports !!

    • @sankets392
      @sankets392 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Control plane trafic uses either multicast ip or stp uses broadcast which is resolved by peer switch ….. they are not broadcast packets

  • @sankets392
    @sankets392 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If for every vip request only primary replies with vmac then how will any traffic will go to secondary because n5k switch will save details of vmac-vip-interface of primry n7k

    • @TheNetworkShooters
      @TheNetworkShooters  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      From 5K prospective it’s a port channel not individual ports going to two different switches

  • @show.ip.routeconnected8364
    @show.ip.routeconnected8364 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tremendous Job

  • @somykt
    @somykt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why did you enable preeption for hsrp on both the switches. should it not be only on vpc primiary hsrp as when ever that reloads it shuold take the hsrp active role??

    • @TheNetworkShooters
      @TheNetworkShooters  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As in nexus vpc setup you can see for data traffic both are active hence it wont make much difference..

    • @somykt
      @somykt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the clarification. So if we give the preemtion on one side which is the primary vpc should be ok?

    • @TheNetworkShooters
      @TheNetworkShooters  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@somykt yea

    • @somykt
      @somykt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheNetworkShooters Brilliant. By the way i have learnt alot from you. do you provide one to one training?

    • @TheNetworkShooters
      @TheNetworkShooters  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@somykt no, i do not get much time, whenever i get time i create these videos..🙂

  • @priyanshumaithani7503
    @priyanshumaithani7503 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If hsrp/vrrp act as active/active in nexus so did we required peer-gateway command in vpc?

    • @TheNetworkShooters
      @TheNetworkShooters  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea, peer gateway is designed for special cases, because when we enable peer gateway vpc devices also start listening for the SVI mac of other peer apart from vmac, you can check out peer gateway lecture for more info on this

    • @priyanshumaithani7503
      @priyanshumaithani7503 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheNetworkShooters Thanks

    • @themuleify
      @themuleify 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What you said about object tracking is not accurate. It depends how the switch are configured for routing. Also the svi is not shutting down of the uplink fails.. if we are using object tracking then we expect a fail over to the other switch. if we use secondary routing via the peer link through the other switch then there should not be a black hole.

    • @themuleify
      @themuleify 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      But tutorial is great.