Hi, very useful and easy to follow tutorial. However I've got to say that t I find the example a bit unfortunate. I cannot get on with the idea of wife being an element of husband as it is his age or his name. In most of the democratic countries the wife doesn't belong to his husband. I know it's only an example but it really shows the still stick in the past mentality. My suggestion for a better, more democratic and fair example would be something like: ( insert here name, age, whatever elements of that person..) (insert here name, age, whatever elements of that person..) If we want real equality we have to change these little things too. Thanks for the tutorial :)
Well if we are to nitpick... Why is the wife element below the husband element as if women are below men? Why are you defining the members of a marriage by binary terms? (husband or wife) as if same-sex marriage does not exist? why does the marriage contain only two elements with no respect for cultures with polygamy? What about people of a certain sex who identify with a different role than the one you assigned to them? (i.e a male who is married to a man and a woman and identifies himself as a wife)? What about people who decide to marry themselves? I find your comment offensive as it contains clear elements of racism, homophobia, and patriarchy and does not include minorities and alternative lifestyles.
People.... A husband 'HAS A' wife...Period. There is a "HAS A" Relationship. It is common sense that a husband doesn't own a wife or that a wife is beneath the husband. Sigh...(Feeling annoyed). Listen to what he says when he creates the DTD document. Listen Carefully. He says: "...should only have one wife" (When he creates the second line within the DTD. At the end).
Thanks dude, 10 years and still helping
real man fr
Even after 11 years, this video still continues to help many people
Simply directly explained, good job!
real
You are the best there"s🙌
"It's XML, it's complicated enough!"
Probs why I'm still not married.
@@MlleJulliette watching in 2018
Lamao😂
Thanks dude very simple and very easy tutorial
What is the difference if you write or put the asterisk inside the parens e.g. (husband*) ?
These toturials are so nostagilic...
Excellent!
Thank you!
Thank you so much!
Wonderful ! beautifully explained sir...thank you.
very good example and explanation
Hi, ..
Don't we need to create any element for wife's age element in DTD?
Thank you very much. You help me a lot!.
Helped out alot, thanks very much :)
I know I'm like, 8 years and two days late, but why are "name" and "wname" two different things?
Well explained! Tysm
Hi, One of the things I did not understand is why we are entering *. please let me know
He says in the video at about 1:00, the asterisk lets the xml document being validated have 0 OR more of the specified element.
Sir ye aap ke computer par kaun sa app hai
hello, i am a timetraveler from 2008 and your video looks shit.
but it helped me a lot :)
Thx
thank you kind sir!
When you omit the asterisk, can there be AT MOST one of each specified element or does there HAVE to be one of each specified element?
also yur name's dope
guess what, in Poland we are still learning this language at university👍
O ty też? U nas politechnice gdańskiej też trzeba się uczyć tego gówna
Thanks!
poor matt has to stay home and look after his kids while his wife Annie has to do all the work.
Still usefull 8 yo later, ty
Elias Turnpike
If you see windows xp and notedpad, that means its legit!
U didnt run
xsff
Hi, very useful and easy to follow tutorial. However I've got to say that t I find the example a bit unfortunate. I cannot get on with the idea of wife being an element of husband as it is his age or his name. In most of the democratic countries the wife doesn't belong to his husband. I know it's only an example but it really shows the still stick in the past mentality. My suggestion for a better, more democratic and fair example would be something like:
( insert here name, age, whatever elements of that person..)
(insert here name, age, whatever elements of that person..)
If we want real equality we have to change these little things too. Thanks for the tutorial :)
llanosflats ss
Well if we are to nitpick... Why is the wife element below the husband element as if women are below men? Why are you defining the members of a marriage by binary terms? (husband or wife) as if same-sex marriage does not exist? why does the marriage contain only two elements with no respect for cultures with polygamy? What about people of a certain sex who identify with a different role than the one you assigned to them? (i.e a male who is married to a man and a woman and identifies himself as a wife)? What about people who decide to marry themselves?
I find your comment offensive as it contains clear elements of racism, homophobia, and patriarchy and does not include minorities and alternative lifestyles.
People.... A husband 'HAS A' wife...Period. There is a "HAS A" Relationship. It is common sense that a husband doesn't own a wife or that a wife is beneath the husband. Sigh...(Feeling annoyed). Listen to what he says when he creates the DTD document. Listen Carefully. He says: "...should only have one wife" (When he creates the second line within the DTD. At the end).
@@cyberlord64 Ahaha omfg, gold answer!!!!!
@@cyberlord64 Thanks, that response was needed. These virtue signaling busy bodies don't realize how toxic they really are.
chup