Google Made a Time Crystal That Defies Physics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 543

  • @Bofore13
    @Bofore13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1428

    Physicists: You can't just defy the flow of time!
    Also physicists: You are already holding my beer.

  • @groob33
    @groob33 3 ปีที่แล้ว +923

    This is very exciting. Unfortunately, I have no idea why.

    • @joshuathomas512
      @joshuathomas512 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      but you also do

    • @meestyouyouestme3753
      @meestyouyouestme3753 3 ปีที่แล้ว +82

      If you feel excited and then not and then excited periodically please call the number on your screen as you may be a time Crystal.

    • @leif1075
      @leif1075 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why do you say that?

    • @Mr.aAdDies
      @Mr.aAdDies 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@leif1075 I can't speak for him exactly but for me it's because Seeker made a video 4:16 video about the VERY periphery of human knowledge, when people think of technology we think of practical applications for it and this is soo extra

    • @mr.o107
      @mr.o107 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Have you ever seen one on...WEED?!😁🤙🎭

  • @Mr.Whitehouse
    @Mr.Whitehouse 3 ปีที่แล้ว +359

    Scientists: fail to make a time crystal
    Scientists: expand definition of time crystal
    Scientists: “We made a time crystal!”

    • @GDawg2K2
      @GDawg2K2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      See Google!

    • @helicopter2293
      @helicopter2293 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ahhahahhahahaa 😲

    • @rps714
      @rps714 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      100% and then don't call it a Casio wrist watch or say it doesn't require Magnets, Super Cooling, lasers, and microwaves to........ JIGGLE.

  • @NZ-fo8tp
    @NZ-fo8tp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +323

    Things don't defy physics, they expand them. That being said, its been a long-held theory that the 2nd law of thermodynamics only holds any certainty for statistically complicated systems. So for example, a bundle of a million particles may only have 1 or 2 'ordered' states out a quintillion possible chaotic states. For a small system of >20 particles it is reasonable to allow some deviation from the 2nd law of thermodynamics because even if you just let the particles move freely, there is not insignificant chance that they end up in a more ordered state then they started in, just by random chance. This has been demonstrated before.

    • @djayjp
      @djayjp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      I guess their argument why this is different is that it's controlled, potentially perpetual and constantly shifting back and forth, not mere Brownian motion (while it lasted anyway). I'm just not at all clear on what "net energy" here means as it wasn't clarified.

    • @theuseraccountname
      @theuseraccountname 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      "defies physics" draws clicks.

    • @georgesaliba8876
      @georgesaliba8876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@djayjp I think the net energy he was mentioning was the laser/microwave EM waves hitting a row of particles, thus the particles not absorbing the EM energy, making the net energy 0 in all; since the row of particles energy never changed during the EM hitting them.

    • @djayjp
      @djayjp 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@georgesaliba8876 I suppose, but who knows. It's as though the energy is somehow used by the particles but not?

    • @georgesaliba8876
      @georgesaliba8876 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@djayjp think of the light as sound waves, and the particles as a medium. The sound needs the medium to travel, but in this case, as it's light, no medium is needed, but utilized for the time crystal.

  • @DrZedDrZedDrZed
    @DrZedDrZedDrZed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +159

    They didn’t evade the second law. The second law states that the entropy of a system CAN stay the same. It just can’t go down. Not saying it’s an easy feat at all to get an entire system of entangled particles to switch spins on command, but the results don’t defy the known laws of physics.

    • @FLS96
      @FLS96 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Yeah entropy certainly can decrease in an isolated system and it isn't even that unlikely on a very tiny scale. It has been observed by physicists many times. Even on a large scale, albeit EXTREMELY unlikely, it's possible to "unscramble" an egg for example.
      It's often said that the entropy of an isolated system can never decrease, but this law is probabilistic in nature, not fundamental, so it can be violated. Saying it 'tends' to increase makes it fundamental. So, the wording matters here.
      And when the system is not isolated, it's even more obvious. Just like it's mass can be changed by adding or taking away stuff.

    • @YawnGod
      @YawnGod 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@FLS96 There is no such thing as isolation, so the problem solves itself. It's magic, yo.

    • @tiger3091
      @tiger3091 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Might hv increased a wee-bit, negligible, so to say😂❤....maybe something of the order of pre-inflation levels

    • @Reth_Hard
      @Reth_Hard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I read recently about superconductors on Wikipedia and apparently, if you make a loop with a superconducting wire, you can make the electricity flow indefinitely. It's kinda like that silly meme of a Power strip plugged into itself... At first It seems to break the second law of td but you still can't power anything with that, at least, not for too long.
      It's pretty much just like stars inside a galaxy, they might be in a perpetual motion, but you can't use that motion to extract an infinite amount of energy.

    • @ThanksIfYourReadIt
      @ThanksIfYourReadIt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      **Black hole enters the chat**

  • @swmtothemoon6660
    @swmtothemoon6660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +174

    I wish there were better graphics to actually physically display what all of this looks like in real life. Obviously these crystals don't look like diamonds or fractal patterns on a TH-cam video. I wish I could actually see what's going on in real life.

    • @cheesejuice_
      @cheesejuice_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      its like peeing supercooled gel with airdryier in hand

    • @ooghaboogha4362
      @ooghaboogha4362 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@cheesejuice_ can relate

    • @moRaaOTAKU
      @moRaaOTAKU 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I thought the name had nothing to do with what it actually is

    • @ericsaul9306
      @ericsaul9306 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      The problem with that is that what this does looks like on a physical level is a meaningless question, to be able to see you need to interact with matter by sending photons in that general direction, but photons are just "too big", it's like trying to get the texture of an ant with fingers the size of a building, the mere act of seeing destroys the system

    • @cheesejuice_
      @cheesejuice_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ericsaul9306 I dont look up circuits

  • @xanderellem3646
    @xanderellem3646 3 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    Time crystals eh...hopefully this leads to a sequel to timesplitters: future perfect.

    • @_q0wOp
      @_q0wOp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Wauwwww loved that games, with the monkey gun
      😂

    • @mraaronhd
      @mraaronhd 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Timesplitters 2 was my jam back in the day.

    • @james6401
      @james6401 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're using a subjunctive, not the future petfect

    • @magnamic5614
      @magnamic5614 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      OMFG! The fact that you made this comment…you deserve everything! I want a remake/sequel to this gem of a game so bad.

    • @padwhelan7698
      @padwhelan7698 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey!? You're me!

  • @anonymous.youtuber
    @anonymous.youtuber 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Every time I hear about things that “defy physics” I’m rather underwhelmed than flabbergasted.

  • @martenjustrell446
    @martenjustrell446 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    click bait headline . Sure important to get views but when doing so to the extent that it compromises with the quality of the content it's not ok.

  • @zachcrawford5
    @zachcrawford5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    If the crystal can continuously flip phase when stimulated by a laser without changing the entropy of the system and stops flipping phase when the laser stops, then that sounds like we can now observe a laser without affecting it. This would mean that quantum cryptography is pretty much dead.

  • @HayzerX
    @HayzerX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Ok, going by a statement that there is an energy difference between up and down spin, if there are equal number of up and down position qbits in the setup, the energy on flipping would move between the neighboring qbits and balance the flip. The open questions are, did the "crystal" change its behavior (because I'd think in an atom, spins could flip concurrently as well as long as the energy levels balance out and the atom remains as the same atom), how much energy does it cost to read that row of qbits, how much energy was spent on the flip through the laser pulse (which is the initial energy cost, unless they were able to recapture the laser pulse 100%) and what was their accuracy of measuring the error (I'm not aware of anything human-made that doesn't have a % of error)?
    For them to have defied physics, if they lost no energy, there should also be no new information to extract. If they can prove the loss of energy was non-existent and they got new information out of the system they influenced, perhaps new ideas can be derived.
    What irks me most is that they call this a repeating pattern in time. It is clearly a dependent system. All of the repetitions are defined by the timing of the system that generates the pulses. This type of "sexy" talk tells me that there is some serious bs going on here and its probably just funding they are after.

  • @jackshizt6670
    @jackshizt6670 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I've been trying to keep up on these for a few months now, it's interesting to see how it's growing and becoming more and more stable. I think that they could eventually be used in some machinery, but maybe only in space would it be able to fully stabilize I think, perhaps even be used a sort of fuel or energy source if it could be contained in a magnetic field? I'm no physicist or scientist by any means, but I still find this to be a very intriguing phenomena.

    • @andrewthag
      @andrewthag 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The qubits are from superconducting Al so probably?

  • @bjarnes.4423
    @bjarnes.4423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    It doesn't defy physics, the title would sound must more awesome as "Google Made a Time Crystal Using a Quantum Computer"

  • @Shanghaimartin
    @Shanghaimartin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Breaking news: Everything changes when hit with energy.
    Even my Starbucks cup can flip states when I add energy to the system with my hand.

  • @windsonma8209
    @windsonma8209 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To be perfectly Honest when I first herd of 'Time Crystals' the first thought that Ran through my Head was that it sounded like Something from Star Trek

  • @L0R3N23
    @L0R3N23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Messing with time never seems to end well

    • @fbyi2940
      @fbyi2940 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@carrasco4712 doctor sin?

  • @rickyb.1680
    @rickyb.1680 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    we're on the precipice of discovering something you would never even conceive of possibly the control of matter itself that's basic science fiction but I believe honestly you're on the verge of discovering the key to different Quantum realities the key to literally open doorways

  • @davidvalenzuela3144
    @davidvalenzuela3144 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I was wondering could you not only run experiments under vacuum but also v variating temperatures . What if colder atmospheric temperatures help slow any process down.

    • @KalebPeters99
      @KalebPeters99 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Indeed! Many types of qubit function on this principle :) They also need to be sheilded from cosmic rays and all other types of interference to prevent decoherence.

  • @mckanebullerlee3020
    @mckanebullerlee3020 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Isn’t a “time-crystal” magnetite? It has it own magnetic dipole moment and has its own electrostatic flux field. It’s has self energy and dissipates EMF frequency in specific ranges. And if energized by an external force... it does even more.
    Isn’t a time crystal just the center of a black-hole? I mean, c’mon... Fe3O4... Quantum Fields up to the Max!

  • @larryphillips4164
    @larryphillips4164 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here at DARPA we use a device that’s sort of like what this video shows however it pulls electrons from surrounding air molecules and replaces the electrons flowing from permanent magnets and some other tech i can’t name to move an armature to generate power. It looks like a real perpetual motion machine and it’s been running since 1992.

  • @xeterbixiv9932
    @xeterbixiv9932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Isn't this just some form of oscillation of its state? Why do we need to call it a 'Time Crystal' ?

    • @AEONIC_MUSIC
      @AEONIC_MUSIC 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It doesn't absorb energy to oscillate

  • @timng9104
    @timng9104 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow nice work Julian, very engaging topic and delivery.

  • @Awesomekraken677
    @Awesomekraken677 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I reckon if they could get the crystal to be stable it would be pretty easy to use for storage.

  • @clarkgregb
    @clarkgregb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    4min and 15 sec of a cool name and dramatic music. Nice one Seeker.

  • @anarex0929
    @anarex0929 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This doesn't violate any laws of physics, as they use energy and the 4th dimension in ways we have not thought to use.
    Also nothing violates the laws of physics if you can do it in our reality. It merely shows that there's something we don't understand about the fundamental building blocks of our reality.

  • @rca168
    @rca168 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It's exciting because it's sounds like doing a calculation without expending energy. And it sort of is.

  • @crescentmoon3532
    @crescentmoon3532 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This lowkey proves particularly can acknowledge each other because without the others partials you wouldn’t have the prescription of time passing there not moving because of the particals hitting them there moving because the particals passing through them take up time so but the end of the time it takes to pass through them they are reverting back to there original state changing from one state back to the original

  • @daxxonjabiru428
    @daxxonjabiru428 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "Humans are at their most endearing when they attempt to understand subjects beyond their reasoning skills." -Anon

    • @aethervvav1658
      @aethervvav1658 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That would be absolutely everything we have ever thought about… so I agree ☝️

  • @professordanfurmanek3732
    @professordanfurmanek3732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done Seeker!!
    Properly explained and Incredibly inspiring!! Where will the next steps take us!!

    • @mr.o107
      @mr.o107 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let's just smoke it n see what's really 😏 going on!🎭

  • @Martial-Mat
    @Martial-Mat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    How is this "evading" the second law of thermodynamics? The second law talks about energy in a CLOSED system. The use of microwaves from outside contradicts that.

    • @georgesaliba8876
      @georgesaliba8876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well yes, but the energy of the particles before the use of microwaves remained the same as after the microwaves were absorbed/interacted with the particles. So therefore, net energy is zero in regards to the particles.

    • @theglobalinfection3980
      @theglobalinfection3980 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Microwaving crystals in a microwave should do the trick.

  • @TurinTuramber
    @TurinTuramber 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    *Perpetual motion is a big no no*
    Edge of the Universe scowls.

  • @CyPorter
    @CyPorter 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    When lasers came out they were just a strange novelty. Maybe time crystals will be the next game changer. Evading entropy seems like a way heat could be turned into useable power. Imagine using the heat in a room to power your phone!

  • @Hataldir
    @Hataldir 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There's a bit of title in you clickbait.

  • @justanotherfella4585
    @justanotherfella4585 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The mention of time crystals reminds me of a short story by J.G.Ballard. Charming little things, they were kind of flowers in the story.

  • @anand.suralkar
    @anand.suralkar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ok physics getting some movie level fancy.
    Also this can provide quantum memory

  • @booJay
    @booJay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I highly recommend folks check out any podcasts/lectures done by Frank Wilczek on TH-cam. He's not only a phenomenonal physicist, but a fantastic explainer of complicated topics.

  • @EyesOfByes
    @EyesOfByes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Dating is like quantum physics:
    There are a certain set of rules, but everything in between is just probability. Nothing is certain, and most of it doesn't make any sense

    • @aryaarunavdash5351
      @aryaarunavdash5351 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dropping truth bombs...

    • @Godakuri
      @Godakuri 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your mother

    • @spacecowboy07723
      @spacecowboy07723 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only thing that's certain is when you measure the quantum date probability the results always end up as smashing her jealous friend.

    • @EyesOfByes
      @EyesOfByes 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@spacecowboy07723 That's another way of explaining the wavefunction collaps 😁

  • @brucetutty9984
    @brucetutty9984 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Would locking these qubits in pairs, and entangling two pairs, make them stabler and thus less error prone?

  • @Zeno2Day
    @Zeno2Day 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Regarding the initial statements, complete sentences would be nice.

  • @raptorhunter5549
    @raptorhunter5549 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This technology will help my build my space empire nicely

  • @SzymczykProductions
    @SzymczykProductions 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Physicists: You just can't defy the flow of time!!
    Also Physicist: You're already holding my beer.. 🍻🍺

  • @flix7280
    @flix7280 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Last time i heard about a chemist making some blue crystals, wondering what's up with the physicists lately

  • @DeliciosoChino
    @DeliciosoChino 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    time crystals are energy for time machines!

    • @Masslazy1
      @Masslazy1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The most powerful magnetic computer

  • @VexMage
    @VexMage 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Our campus/ professor, helped create that Sycamore processor!

  • @anubhavjaiswal7876
    @anubhavjaiswal7876 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I will read second law of thermodynamics in my coaching class today

  • @TheLastAlexander
    @TheLastAlexander 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Believe it or not but this is been in the process for a while

  • @tritun5154
    @tritun5154 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Makes me think about the tic tac bouncing back and forth like a ping pong ball in a glass

  • @jacks16384
    @jacks16384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Biological computers (super computers) are the future.

  • @christianmorgan7366
    @christianmorgan7366 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can we time travel or space travel in a time crystal like Interdimesiomal and Multidimensional places

  • @TinyGiraffes
    @TinyGiraffes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You can't just combine a car word and a science word and hope it means something

    • @akuljamwal3085
      @akuljamwal3085 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Autobiographies are meaningless

  • @jacobknott3395
    @jacobknott3395 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know I remember a show called code lyoko and I talked about cubits and things in that show pretty interesting to me

  • @xusux
    @xusux 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Physics : Noone can defy me
    Physists : Hold my clock

  • @nicklevi5537
    @nicklevi5537 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like the phrase "conventional super computer". Its already obsolete before i even saw one 😅🤣. We're moving too fast.. too fast!

  • @Tachsman
    @Tachsman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr. Who will be giving a lecture on Time Crystals in the near future, the recent past, and now?

  • @alileevil
    @alileevil 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If the qubits changed orientation wasn’t energy absorbed to induce the change in position?

  • @protocol6
    @protocol6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your description of a floquet time crystal is indistinguishable from a mechanical clock or a run of the mill crystal oscillator used as a clock source in nearly every computer. They are oscillators that are given just enough of a regular kick to avoid slowing down. Granted, they aren't perfect as they typically drift over long periods unless corrected with an atomic clock. At which point I have to ask what's the difference between an atomic clock and a floquet time crystal? It's quantum and it oscillates between two states at a constant frequency without slowing down.

    • @harshjinger
      @harshjinger 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Atomic is Clock is comprised of an atom.
      This is crystal. Meaning a collection of atoms.
      The difference is same as one between a sine wave and a pulse.

  • @Giveitaresssstt
    @Giveitaresssstt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This..does put a smile on my face

  • @PersonalIzzy
    @PersonalIzzy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Humble question can one of those crystals heal metaphysical properties?

  • @TrCic
    @TrCic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Still dependent upon the energy pulses to flip to a different state, seems pretty useless to me as a clock as the timing will be determined by those pulses.

    • @ThanksIfYourReadIt
      @ThanksIfYourReadIt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Transistors in computing pretty much do this and since light is a much easier controled medium as electricity it could be used as super efficient super precise computers. However if shielding would be necceseary against other form of electromagnetic waves then cost probably far outwegiht the above benifits.

  • @AjmerPhull
    @AjmerPhull 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How does a particle "spin" when (microwave) light passes through it if the particle doesn't absorb some energy from it?

  • @drstone7014
    @drstone7014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If you talk to Normies of time crystal they say it's fiction and come back to reality

  • @vexcarius7100
    @vexcarius7100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Google: developing time crystals
    Apple: still figuring out how to remove their phone’s notch.

  • @0ptimal
    @0ptimal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Guessing a bit but this technology seems like it could eventually be, for the holder, the equivalent of a super power. No?

  • @MelindaGreen
    @MelindaGreen 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It could very well have applications in improved atomic clocks.

  • @justinhackstadt6677
    @justinhackstadt6677 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm telling you, within the next 10 years this new quantum computing is going to reveal some absolute groundbreaking theories and new technologies. 🤔❤

    • @tyvernoverlord5363
      @tyvernoverlord5363 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hopefully Inertial Dampening, Artificial Gravity, and Anti-gravity....

  • @skycladsquirrel
    @skycladsquirrel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its like the LED. It's used in almost all our products today. Once we figure it out it's applications could be endless.

  • @tluangasailo3663
    @tluangasailo3663 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't really comprehend what they actually doing here, but it's sounds great

  • @vkgamingplatform7247
    @vkgamingplatform7247 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been waiting for this time crystal for so long i want to a physical thing large enough to hold in my hand made of time crystal.

  • @katielynne
    @katielynne 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oohhhh, I like where this is headed 😃

  • @chikiwiki64
    @chikiwiki64 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "AAAH!!! Keep back, you weak-minded fool! Avert your gaze, or you'll go CRYSTAL CRAZY!!"

  • @carltongannett
    @carltongannett 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I mean its not really a perpetual motion machine if you can't pull work out of it and I assume a time crystal, if you did extract any energy from it, would no longer be a time crystal?

  • @ВиталийОвчаренко-т7й
    @ВиталийОвчаренко-т7й 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The significance of Google creating a time crystal that defies the laws of physics is that it challenges one of the fundamental principles of thermodynamics, the second law. Time crystals are able to cycle between states without losing energy, which goes against the principle that entropy, or disorder, in an isolated system must always increase. This discovery could have profound implications for our understanding of physics and potentially revolutionize fields such as quantum computing.

  • @wolfyframe
    @wolfyframe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm very curios about it's application in vary sistems

  • @FriendlyCynic
    @FriendlyCynic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wait, I thought perpetual motion requires work. Can't you have a perfectly balanced system in which no energy is lost or gained, but continues perpetually, however, the second you try to put a load on it to get any useful energy out of it, the system fails?

    • @rps714
      @rps714 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      exactly why he said it could be a computer simulation and no one would know the difference.

  • @kialm1820
    @kialm1820 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, its breakthroughs like this!, that people cannot predict the future. This is f**king amazing, can you imagine what this technology will unlock in 50 or 100 years. You can't because it is just THAT amazing!

  • @gwiz6278
    @gwiz6278 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear lord, the Wheel of Time Age of Wonders is happening.

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video.

  • @doedesjel
    @doedesjel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So the qubits of the processor's data are.... Non-thermal? No dissipating fans or cooling systems required? 👀

  • @patrickegan8866
    @patrickegan8866 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry but I'm calling this bunk. Saying they defied physics 'at least for a few milliseconds' is not defying physics. You also state up front they had to change the definition. So which is it?

  • @JayBandersnatch
    @JayBandersnatch 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nothing ever defies physics, It only defies our Current understanding of physics!

  • @L8rCloud
    @L8rCloud 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't Ions in solution form Crystals and then go back into solution within its equilibrium? When you throw salt into a saucepan and see salt crystals at the bottom it's never static. The crystals you see are in constant transition, constantly dissolving and precipitating/reforming crystals the net result of which demonstrates as no 'apparent' change....so why couldn't a crystal shift between arrangements like a sort of crystalline version of a spring - furthermore it's a stretch to say that nothing is causing this. If it's being observed then then photons (light) are hitting it.

  • @TAURELLIAN
    @TAURELLIAN 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This can be used for energy-lossless computation

  • @bobedwards8896
    @bobedwards8896 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    closer and closer to assignable magnet crystals leading to gravity manipulation

  • @drstone7014
    @drstone7014 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about systems of life that's is that a perpetual motion machine

  • @xusux
    @xusux 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dr strange : Oh no they are closing the gap

  • @ronaldwhite1730
    @ronaldwhite1730 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank - you .

  • @sonnydey
    @sonnydey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow that's like two cool things in one, when a quantum computer also becomes a time crystal. But what also can be really cool is a time memory chip, It's where you write to the time memory chip in the future and can read that now.

  • @Adventures_of_Marshmallow
    @Adventures_of_Marshmallow 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You see, one of my problems is that we don't assign any value to errors. If a system is supposed to calculate some value and it produces a value outside expectation, we assign a value of "error" to this and all other values outside expectation.... But that's wrong. Give an error some sort of pathway and it will become meaningful to the calculations the system is producing. Especially in a quantum system.

  • @coltonboxell1960
    @coltonboxell1960 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm trying to answer a question. Is this non-zero sigma for sigma real Laplace frequency?

  • @biblical-events
    @biblical-events 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So what energy is consumed ? I think I missed it

  • @tahirbacha431
    @tahirbacha431 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's the role of magnons

  • @Staminist-MMF-80
    @Staminist-MMF-80 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing and countless possibilities !!

  • @jaredf6205
    @jaredf6205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this not just the piezoelectric effect? When you run electricity through a crystal, the oscillate.

    • @NB-yu4lj
      @NB-yu4lj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like it

  • @ananke2104
    @ananke2104 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can see Linda Hamilton reading about this and pouring another shot of rye.

  • @therealpentap5266
    @therealpentap5266 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The machine reminds me of that short series called Devs that came out a while back. Played with deterministic universe theories. Was some pretty janky stuff 🤯

  • @nunyabiz.fofffoff
    @nunyabiz.fofffoff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow they can point a light and flip things back and forth, congrats they could be helping people who need real help but instead they play with lights and crystals. Our creators would be so proud.

  • @GorFrag
    @GorFrag 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Time cube?

  • @spearshaker7974
    @spearshaker7974 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Heard u can get quazicrystals by letting molten bismuth solidify in a strong magnetic field.

  • @debabratadey923
    @debabratadey923 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its simply the breaking of continuous time translational symmetry.Thats it.

  • @SurinderKumar-os5il
    @SurinderKumar-os5il 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir
    Excellent