ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ต.ค. 2021
- 📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
Law school prep: studicata.com/law-school
Bar exam prep: studicata.com/bar-exam
Free courses: studicata.com/free-courses
❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
Community: studicata.com/groups/community
Testimonials: studicata.com/testimonials-an...
Submit a review: shoutout.studicata.com
📱 TECH
iOS app: studicata.com/ios
Android app: studicata.com/android
📣 ABOUT
Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
Email: info@studicata.com
Learn more: studicata.com
🎬 VIDEO INFO
Torts: Intentional Torts - Trespass to Chattels and Conversion Elements
Learn more: studicata.com
![รวมเพลงลูกทุ่ง 6 หนุ่มไทบ้าน ฮิตติดกระแส ชุดที่ 1 l มนต์แคน ไมค์ ไผ่ เสถียร ไหมไทย พี [Longplay]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/GD2v1OjMw5I/mqdefault.jpg)
love all your videos! very helpful. love the way you explain and repeat
Thank you so much-happy to help!
Waoh.
Thank you so much.
Loved it. Very helpful
Awesome-happy to help!
Moveable object such as a negotiable instrument, promissory note.
If the defendant demands $136,000 be paid to them after they have trespasses and converted or sold your property, the sums so tendered represent an impairment of the available improvement/ maintenance budget.
What if the property should be deemed abandoned if they knew of a tax sale and refused to remove their property or make arrangements for their property to be removed?
ur the best. im engaged and right there w u. im gonna keep watching and studying w u. its sooooooo helpful. and ur cute ur not an old guy prof. aloha!
Awesome-I'm glad the videos are helpful for you!
Where's that form online that allows me to accurately put how much money???
Is a trademark be counted as real property if someone THAT KNOWS the trademark because they got a cease and desist and used it in commerce and as a result the company that STOLE the tm and benefit profit and you can prove it with a purchase of services via invoice that shows that rhe registered owner has suffered loss now can prove ACTUAL DAMAGES
im in Australia, and the tm is Registered and the company that benefited from the Registered tm and they KNEW it was Registered through a cease and desist
would this work?
sounds like someone betrayed someone.
my opinion: if he had knowledge its intentional.
@@princessruth9155 maxim of law, all intentions apply to all Laws
@@princessruth9155 i found out how to sort it
in Australia, Australia Constitution 1901 sect 51 (xxxi) is the go
they used personal property IP that has a owner attached to the thing, the criminals that took the tm for public use BUT didnt PAY just Compensation FOR the Property (Intellectual Property) also the TM is in a irrevocable trust with a pour-over will and choice of law the cook islands
the trust has a arbitration clause as well
in U.S.A is the 5th amendment Property Rights AND title 15 USC 1117 and Allan v Cooper is a IP case law
my discovery is like no other as it gives me power to pierce through their corporate veil, even the 11th amendment has no power to protect municipal government BECAUSE they ARE Criminals
this is what i learnt in 8 months since i first saw this video
the trademark was transfered into a Irrevocable trust from the creator/settlor transfered into the trust
is chattel just a synonym for personal property?
7:17
Basically
Trespass to chattel doesn't merge into conversion? 😕
No
I was annoyed at first that he repeats himself, then I realized it was intentional for memorization by listeners
Can you do a video on booby traps where a person sets them to protect their property from trespassers?
How that bill does zero good. The constitution and i demand in person. Period. She's a threat against her very own oath. Child online safety. How about child safety period first. And court according to the Constitution.
Cannot take my name in vain. Parks can't be your property except like every other park