There was a documentary clip on TH-cam (I can't find it, it was simply titled Loch Ness Monster or something without detailed description) where he said "I DON'T LIE AND MY PHOTOGRAPHS ARE AUTHENTIC!..... Well, is there a possibility the photos were not authentic, why yes, that possibility always exists! :O"
@@TREYtheExplainerSlightly off topic but do you know where to find the music you used for this video? I couldn’t find it online despite viewing the credits
@@cptinvincible3223 r/UnexpectedJoJo Stand Name: Basking Owl Stand User: Trey the Explainer Stand Ability: Changes shape to fool enemies into believing it is a horrible beast, but is actually just a decayed basking owl
@@ELWOPPO2010 They are real. The Japanese have a famous photo of one they caught in 1977. Very fascinating indeed. He was massive and fit all of the eyewitness descriptions
@@trevinhickman9022 no they most certainly do not. I assume you are referring to the Zuiyo Maru carcass - which was categorically identified as a Basking Shark
You may be on to something! I tend to think it is a manifestation of our sexual and social insecurities. The long neck many witnesses report is phallic in nature and represents our insecurities of masculinity or manhood - the eternal desire that something large and majestic of the past is still roaming this earth. Doc Shiel's muppet photo is an exemplary example of this projection. On the other hand, the sightings of large humps represent maternity - the dark, uncertain thoughts we have of our origins, harboured in a collective womb.
Karl Smallwood (on ‘Factfiend’ here on TH-cam) managed to track down the entire story; basically, a guy who was investing a Nessie sighting for a newspaper was fired when we handed them an article that basically proved said paper’s months-long quest to find the thing was entirely based in misinformation, so he paid a friend, the Gynocologyst, to take the picture of the toy submarine, just to troll the paper. Instead of it going as planned, the paper re-hired the guy to investigate, so the guy just kept trolling them.
I'm sure there is a logical explanation for the owlman. I'm pretty sure everybody here already guessed it...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................That's right, the owlman is a decomposing basking shark!
Please put the megalodon conspiracy to rest. I'm sick of people going "well we've only explored 5% of the whole ocean so it could be in the deepest parts" what I'm sick of saying is that it's not 5% of the whole ocean hasn't been explored, it's 5% of the ocean floor has been explored. And megalodon wasn't likely capable of incredible deep sea diving, it was a surface creature who ate whales
I am also extremely tired of that common claim, just like how inappropriately coelacanths are used by cryptozoologists and cryptid proponents it is an example of people using something they haven't seen all the information about
Just like a documentary about thunderbird i watched 2 poorly voiced typical western men in desert: "whats that?" *PROCEEDS TO LIGHT IT UP WITH A FUCKING REVOLVER* best part is thunderbird was sighted around Illinois and alaska, northern places, etc. so i have no clue how they were in a desert lmao. What a joke of a documentary
Lol humans are stupid. As soon as we see a new type of creature we instantly scream “KILL IT OMGGGG ITS DANGEROUS IT MAY BE A SMALL SNAIL BUT ITS NEW SPECIES SO ITS DANGEROUS OMGGGGG BANG BANG KILL IIIIIITTTTTTTT PLLLLLSSSSSS”
*In an alternate reality* : "So who is the Owlman? Well I think it's pretty obvious that it's just a Barn Mothman as many of the traits seem to match up."
TREY the Explainer sometimes the things that bring us joy is unsettling! I suppose that is part of the reason we obsess over cryptids- the are so fantastically terrifying that we feel joy over the unknown and learning about it, as much as a farce it could be it is interestig to think of how such a creature could exist... I could also just say I am a giant dork.. But either way- keep up the good work! I love hearing about the sources of these photos instead of treating it like a clue to a puzzel that will never get solved like most shows do.
@@KittyCatViolet379 There's something phallic about it which is symbolic of our insecurities with masculinity - the eternal desire that something large and majestic of the past is still roaming this earth. Also check out Roy Johnston's 2002 photos and James Gray's from 2001!
You know i didn't expect this to....well hurt me this much. Nessie was my Santa Clause as a kid, i read every book i could on it. Hell i recognized every bit of evidence you showed. I don't even believe in it anymore yet it still screwed with me. For some reason. That being said even as a kid i knew most of those weren't right. The Muppet was too perfect for an unconfirmed creature, the gargoyle was too gnarled to be anything, surgeons i knew was fake, ect. The only one I couldn't explain was the Flipper. And now since you have i can safely say there's not even really a maybe with it anymore Also i don't know if you've done it but if not could you do a paleo profile on Allasaurus
My friend, I know what you feel, but I respectfully think you are wrong. See, the goal of this video is to show how the supposed evidence of the monster is wrong, but this is not enough to disprove its existence. There are many implications to the way we understand the legend by proving wrong the evidence, but the most important of them are those that help us separate what is real and what is just a product of our culture. You see, even if there are real sightings of a monster, culture shapes images that could be radically different. In other words, thinking critically about the evidence of the legend helps us to understand what is just a product of culture and prevents us from chasing an illusion. The legend is still out there, and maybe, just maybe, something really inhabits the lake, but it is not like we thougth.
A couple of years ago, on a family trip to Loch Ness, a boat operator told us that recently, on an expedition to the bottom of the Loch, the monster had been found; that is, a movie prop from an old Sherlock Holmes film, that was lost to the Loch many years ago, was discovered. I've no doubt the discoverers were initially terrified...
I give up, it’s no use denying it anymore. It’s my dick at attention as I did backstrokes in the cold Loch Ness. He entered a time machine and photoshopped the rest of me out.
I guess, its still pretty funny, but I guess it's because I laugh at a lot of scary things, mostly confusion from myself and others, so I've been comparing my German Shepherd dog, to the dire wolf recently, what can you tell me about the two canines?
I'm glad someone else pointed it out. I remember hearing about it in a great old National geographic show called "Is it real?" The only paranormal/Cryptid themed show I can think of that actually looked at things with a real scientific and skeptical view, instead of complete sensationalist bullshit like "lost tapes","Destination truth", "ancient aliens" or "fact or faked".
I like how people who usually believe these super blurt low quality photos “proves” the Loch Ness monster, but thinks that the moon landing footage was faked
I subbed around 5 months ago and forgot to comment on how much I thoroughly enjoy your content. The first video I watched of yours was a paleo profile, I proceeded to watch every one of them. Great work :)
Ok, if Nessie did exist, would it be a giant eel or a long necked seal? Granted, I do think that it's mostly hoaxes and other such stuff, but still. I guess I will get my answer in Part 3 Also, owl-faced basking shark! TRIGGERED!
in 1983, my parents and I visited Loch Ness. I was a year old baby and have no memory, but here's what I was told. We are Koreans and my father was a diplomat. He took few days off work to go on a road trip and while traveling Scotland, decided to make a visit to Loch Ness. It was evening, and they had good time enjoying the view, but had not booked any lodging. To save money, my parents decided to sleep at car over the night, parked next to Loch Ness. Both my parents had heard stories of Loch Ness Monster, but they don't beileve in any cryptids, or any other supernatural stuff and were not concerned. That night however, they sensed something moving near the car, but were too tired to be bothered. The next day they discovered that some patches of grass not far to where car was parked were pressed as if a heavy object had been dragged over it. My parents belive to this day, someone probably moved a boat at night, as strange as it sounds, but there you go
im so sad that it isn't real. I want u to do a video about a creature called Ningen. Its an underrated cryptid that's said to be a whale/human like creature that swims in the Arctic Ocean and spotted by from time to time.
I was always under the impression that some of the underwater photos were of a movie prop that sank in the Lock in 1969. You actually have an image of it towards the end of the video.
No wasn’t possible at all. The prop from Sherlock Holmes had no flippers on it at all. The head was different. The camera was not in that deep of water as where they found the model at. Divers recovered the gargoyle head stump and have it in Adrian’s museum
I watched a Lochness monster documentary once I've been unable to find since. But they did this experiment where they got a bit of pipe and attached it to a buoy underwater, so it bobbed up and down vertically. They deployed it at Lochness in front of this crowd and also at a place down river. The next town over or something I cant remember. They then asked the witnesses to draw what they saw. Everyone at the other town drew a pipe. Almost everyone at lochness drew a long necked creature , some even drew humps. Its all in the mind.
Sounds like Naked Science from National Geographic. Was it the one where they asked this nerdy-sounding boy who was so disappointed it wasn't the monster?
@@omegavladosovich6757 Oh my god dude that's it! The kid comes running down from the hills thinking he'd found the monster. I've been searching for that documentary on and off since it came out in the 2000s! You Sir unlike Nessie are a real legend.
Gynaecologists perform surgeries. Not to mention the English tradition of calling most medical practices surgeries. Calling it the Surgeon's Photo was legitimate. Even if the photo was not
I would't be so clear to say that the Gray photo is a swan. The most popular explanation is it's a labrador retriever fetching a stick, although the unretouched versions of the photo don't show a puppydog face very clearly at all. Another interpretation by Roland Watson and Steven Plambeck is that the monster's head is on the right side and is similar to that of an eel.
Deathhunter101 Nope. Just totally real, sensible people. I have nothing to do with that. Why would you even think I do? Really, just dumb. I mean why would I do anything like that? Totally wrong.
Because Trey tries to portray everything is fake and a hoax - The next thing he will prob try to debunk is UFOs or Underwater ruins for ancient civilzations or the global flood........or the bible?
I've recently been toying with the idea of the Mokele Mbembe being a large flightless bird. That way, it'd still be a dinosaur...just not the kind everyone was expecting ;P
Admiral Cat I believe it has been discovered they it was found to be an unknown species of rhinoceros that lives in the jungle. They are smaller than their African cousins
I've heard a theory that the Hugh Gray photograph is actually a dog swimming towards the camera with a stick in its mouth and that if you improve the contrast, you can see the dog's face in the center of the figure.
I always drop whatever I'm doing whenever I see a new video from you. Sometimes I find myself binge watching your videos (even though i've seen them) and listening to them while I do other things. Nice job and thank you
07:28 "assembled a team of 60 men to kill the monster with machine guns, spears, bombs and machetes" So in other words, your average lads night out in Glasgow.
Easy, people are so desparate for proof of this monster that they will take any drop of "evidence" they can find in order to "prove" it exists. Doesn't matter if it's seals or a pile of sticks, they are delusional enough to believe it.
Right? The colours, the head, the dog-like muzzle... these were obviously seals. I was a young teenager when this photo was revealed, and was very fond of cryptids and supposed monster sightings... but even back then I instantly said "Aren't those just some seals out for a swim?" when I saw it.
One of the more compelling arguments, I always thought anyway, re: the first image, is that it was circus elephants taking a break in the Loch - travelling circuses were common in the 30s and there are a number of accounts of them seen swimming - the gynaecologist most probably saw one and took a picture - only afterwards realizing it looked so serpent-like and, as you say, like the sauropods from King Kong, that he thought it newsworthy. But the curvature of the neck certainly resembles an elephant's trunk. Yours, E x
There might be something in Loch Ness. People believe that krakens were just colossal squids mistaken for sea monsters. Could be a large eel, we do have eels in the UK but they're lower down in places like London.
TREY the Explainer Thanks man! I think 2016 was a rather intriguing year for perfect feather preservations, unique oddball stem birds, & so much more! Also nice step for animated intros! Next step is to evolve good sir!! ; )
TREY the Explainer Oh boy Liaoningosaurus was a surprise at first but most people (and myself included) said the paper explain the piscivory rather poorly and the evidence is actually almost disproves the notion. Mainly the location of the scales, specimens being only juveniles, and much more. Knüppe explain it the best I believe. Also, the carnivorous sauropodomorph _Buriolestes_ & the omnivorous maniraptoran _Fukuivenator_! They were a big surprise, plus Eva with her tail encased in amber(the 🐜 was a plus).
hey Trey; why havent you looked into the giant catfish theory for the monster?! (check it out - viable answer for why the sightings peaked when they did and have petered out)
I read somewhere recently that a scientist took water samples and found DNA of giant eel, which some pictures and videos seen would probably explain it
Am I missing some previous video that explains why he was so upset about Owlman, or is that just set up for whenever he gets to that cryptid? Or is it some reference to the barn owl mothman thing
Indeed a chance. But the real problem with a lot of "Surviving" animals. Is that to not been seen in the time they have been thought to be dead. they would most likely have such a small population. That they don't have a breeding population. Simply put. If there where some when the animal was pronounced extinct... There are most likely not any now.
But remember, the hula painted frog was found out to be alive (I took it as an example because it lives in a very small area at an actually not small population and was thought to be extinct for more than 60 years)
Really like that new intro! I see a lot of channels with a specific style and then come out with an intro that clashes with what they've already established, so its nice to see one that has a style that really suits their channel and works nicely with everything they've done before.
I think that a Bigfoot/Sasquatch one would be amazing, besides the fact that it's the most famous Cryptid there are some amazing photos and videos out there. I just think it would be really cool to see your take on it. Hope you see the comment, awesome video as always!
I'm commenting on videos from 3 years ago again. Just a thought/request/question; There's a show on Netflix entirely focused on debunking hoaxes (most of them not animal related) but they had an episode on the Loch Ness Monster, in which someone proposed that a perfect explanation would be that the sightings of the enormous monstrous creature, from shape to colouring, could in fact be catfish. Apparently not native to the loch, sports hunters introduced the catfish to the loch for fishing purposes. Fast forward about 50 years and suddenly eye witness accounts of a monster in the lake start showing up. Catfish can live up to 60 years ad the Wels Catfish (native to the Baltic, Black and Caspian seas and often introduced to Western Europe as a sport fish) can easily grow up to 5 meters. I have not seen ANY other cryptozoology program or book even MENTION this theory but it is without a doubt the most convincing and logically sound explanation to the Loch Ness monster I have EVER heard, and I would absolutely love to hear if you have any opinions on this, either for or against the theory as I'd like to hear someone talk about this beyond a made-for-Netflix documentary as, even when debunking things, tv shows tend to be less than reliable when it comes to facts, preferring sensationalizing things for the show's agenda.
I live along Okanagan Lake. I saw one video that was supposed to be Ogopogo that was obviously a beaver. This is what happens when city council offers a $1M reward for proof of it. Like Fox Muldaur, I WANT TO BELIEVE, but I just can't any more.
Interesting, I'm just a little unsure of your sources. With all due respect, my understanding of the first image is that there was a deathbed confession, where he (said gyno guy) confessed to actually using a teapot. Then played about with angles and distance to make it look authentic, that is what I read a number of years ago.
Do you have a source on your informations at 9:35 on the 1975 Rhine photo? I had never heard this anywhere before and I can't find a source for your affirmations of it being 50cm longs or part of the lake floor in the articles in your description.
This citation is from the book "Hunting Monsters: Cryptozoology and the Reality Behind the Myths" by Darren Naish and is on page 1083 on the ebook in Chapter 3 - Creatures of Loch and Lake
Thanks a lot for the prompt reply! I will have to check it out. I've read a lot about this underwater body picture as it struck me as the most convincing one ever taken. Upon further investigation, I found something that suggests the objections to it you found from the book you quoted are not indisputable : lochnessmystery.blogspot.com/2017/11/follow-up-to-1975-underwater-photos.html
I'm not sure if I've found any yet. I long for the day I actually find a cryptid with compelling evidence to support its existence. From all the one's I'm aware of I can't think of any that can't just be explained via known phenomena
7:00 that's pretty obvious. A: those are simply light shadows, caused by the camera, due to particles that aren't on the pic, shading the lens. what happens is that specks of dust create shadows, which are 3D, due to dust being partly see-through. B: water shadows cause by the water, having a bend in its angle, due to natural motion (wind and other natural elements). if there's a stripe of water that is directed away from the sun, it gets shaded.
Well I'm bummed this didn't appear on my notifications and I've missed it by 6 days :( Oh well better late than never (looking forward to what you make next, I would like to see a video on the stunk ape or the beast of bray road)
Great video! I think in addition to the land sighting, King Kong also influenced the swan necked sightings, as did Charles Knight's art of sauropods and plesiosaurs. Great breakdown. I used to be a believer in Nessie thanks to these photos and no critical thinking skills :) Hoping for more cryptids: how about some mammals like Sasquatch?
Thanks man! and Definitely, famous prehistoric reptile paints and artwork in books definitely could have effected the loch nes monster. Me too man! I used to believe in everything from psychics to the Ropen. I plan on doing Bigfoot in the future ;)
During the video I say King Kong came out in 1993, this was a mistake I meant to say 1933. My bad
What if the Loch Ness monster was actually Owl man the whole time?
TREY the Explainer Paleo profile giganotosaurus!!!PLZ!!
The name Owl-Man is a bit misleading... he was actually half Basking Shark -'J
no worries, 1993 was the best year! roar!
Make a video about the Tehran incident
I think it's harder to believe that Tony Doc Shiels is a real creature than to believe that Nessie is one.
XD
There was a documentary clip on TH-cam (I can't find it, it was simply titled Loch Ness Monster or something without detailed description) where he said "I DON'T LIE AND MY PHOTOGRAPHS ARE AUTHENTIC!..... Well, is there a possibility the photos were not authentic, why yes, that possibility always exists! :O"
@@TREYtheExplainerSlightly off topic but do you know where to find the music you used for this video? I couldn’t find it online despite viewing the credits
it is harder to believe that your English teacher was allowed to keep her job.
@@bobknobbe3561this is perfectly normal English my guy, what are you on about
The stone.... *_IS HAUNTED_*
*zooms in intensely*
TREY the Explainer that triggered part scared me
Stand Name: The Stone
Stand User: Tony Doc Shields
Stand Ability: Can Haunt People
@@cptinvincible3223 r/UnexpectedJoJo
Stand Name: Basking Owl
Stand User: Trey the Explainer
Stand Ability: Changes shape to fool enemies into believing it is a horrible beast, but is actually just a decayed basking owl
@@Squishito Jojo should always be expected
As a Scotsman I think it's safe to say that most Scottish people's thoughts on this are "yea, it's nonsense, but it keeps the tourist coming".
Sounds like the Australians
Their has to be some truth to this. There has been hundreds of thousands of sightings over the years.
@@ELWOPPO2010 bruh did you not watch part 1 and THIS video? 😕
@@ELWOPPO2010 They are real. The Japanese have a famous photo of one they caught in 1977. Very fascinating indeed. He was massive and fit all of the eyewitness descriptions
@@trevinhickman9022 no they most certainly do not. I assume you are referring to the Zuiyo Maru carcass - which was categorically identified as a Basking Shark
>Gynaecologist
>Famous for taking picture of long object poking up from the water
My Freud senses are tingling.
XD
That's the corniest shit I've ever fucking Read in my life
You may be on to something!
I tend to think it is a manifestation of our sexual and social insecurities. The long neck many witnesses report is phallic in nature and represents our insecurities of masculinity or manhood - the eternal desire that something large and majestic of the past is still roaming this earth. Doc Shiel's muppet photo is an exemplary example of this projection.
On the other hand, the sightings of large humps represent maternity - the dark, uncertain thoughts we have of our origins, harboured in a collective womb.
Karl Smallwood (on ‘Factfiend’ here on TH-cam) managed to track down the entire story; basically, a guy who was investing a Nessie sighting for a newspaper was fired when we handed them an article that basically proved said paper’s months-long quest to find the thing was entirely based in misinformation, so he paid a friend, the Gynocologyst, to take the picture of the toy submarine, just to troll the paper. Instead of it going as planned, the paper re-hired the guy to investigate, so the guy just kept trolling them.
@@omegavladosovich6757 I'm pretty sure he just meant that as a joke and not something super deep like you're trying to portray, lmao!
I'm sure there is a logical explanation for the owlman. I'm pretty sure everybody here already guessed it...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................That's right, the owlman is a decomposing basking shark!
I was taught be the great E.L.Wallace
Armin Reindl sshhh! You'll expose us!
E. L. Wallace Please forgive me master.
Deathhunter101 Oh, will you look at that, my whale head looks really shiny here. Should I use less shampoo?
Deathhunter101 It's just really hard to find conditioners that you can use with claws
Please put the megalodon conspiracy to rest. I'm sick of people going "well we've only explored 5% of the whole ocean so it could be in the deepest parts" what I'm sick of saying is that it's not 5% of the whole ocean hasn't been explored, it's 5% of the ocean floor has been explored. And megalodon wasn't likely capable of incredible deep sea diving, it was a surface creature who ate whales
Exactly. It's unlikely the Megalodon's sent out a newsletter saying, "Shit, the humans are looking for us! Head for the deep, head for the deep!"
I am also extremely tired of that common claim, just like how inappropriately coelacanths are used by cryptozoologists and cryptid proponents it is an example of people using something they haven't seen all the information about
Trey, I will literally give you money to do that
Kane Williams I plan on making a video explaining specifically why that is ;)
TREY the Explainer be careful tray all the salty nessie believers are on to you
I love how the first reaction to the one guy of finding the monster is to KILL IT WITH MACHINE GUNS AND BOMBS.
Humans... Never change...
@Matthew Taylor Yes he shall join us
Lamp oil, Rope, BOMBS? A Lochness Monster? You want it? It's yours my friend as long as you have enough rupees.
@@dreamsprayanimation sorry link i cant give credit, get your own damn loch ness im quitting
Just like a documentary about thunderbird i watched
2 poorly voiced typical western men in desert: "whats that?" *PROCEEDS TO LIGHT IT UP WITH A FUCKING REVOLVER* best part is thunderbird was sighted around Illinois and alaska, northern places, etc. so i have no clue how they were in a desert lmao. What a joke of a documentary
Lol humans are stupid. As soon as we see a new type of creature we instantly scream “KILL IT OMGGGG ITS DANGEROUS IT MAY BE A SMALL SNAIL BUT ITS NEW SPECIES SO ITS DANGEROUS OMGGGGG BANG BANG KILL IIIIIITTTTTTTT PLLLLLSSSSSS”
*In an alternate reality* :
"So who is the Owlman? Well I think it's pretty obvious that it's just a Barn Mothman as many of the traits seem to match up."
But hey, at least we all know Mokele Mbembe is real, right?
i recently studied it and its just about the same as the evidence for the loch ness monster
the living sauropod
Yeah boi.
The people who have seen Mokele Mbembe know it real.Ok
nope.
Also the nessy muppet has an unsettling smile
It's kinda creepy, but lovable... like Doc himself
TREY the Explainer sometimes the things that bring us joy is unsettling! I suppose that is part of the reason we obsess over cryptids- the are so fantastically terrifying that we feel joy over the unknown and learning about it, as much as a farce it could be it is interestig to think of how such a creature could exist... I could also just say I am a giant dork.. But either way- keep up the good work! I love hearing about the sources of these photos instead of treating it like a clue to a puzzel that will never get solved like most shows do.
DinoCookieCat XD Don't worry I'm a massive geek for mystery and science stuff too!
and Thank you! I'm super happy people enjoyed this one ;)
To me it looks just upset, like a guy who who just woke up and didn't have his coffee yet
@@KittyCatViolet379 There's something phallic about it which is symbolic of our insecurities with masculinity - the eternal desire that something large and majestic of the past is still roaming this earth.
Also check out Roy Johnston's 2002 photos and James Gray's from 2001!
You know i didn't expect this to....well hurt me this much. Nessie was my Santa Clause as a kid, i read every book i could on it. Hell i recognized every bit of evidence you showed. I don't even believe in it anymore yet it still screwed with me. For some reason.
That being said even as a kid i knew most of those weren't right. The Muppet was too perfect for an unconfirmed creature, the gargoyle was too gnarled to be anything, surgeons i knew was fake, ect. The only one I couldn't explain was the Flipper. And now since you have i can safely say there's not even really a maybe with it anymore
Also i don't know if you've done it but if not could you do a paleo profile on Allasaurus
Well, at least this didn't hurt you when you did believe it.
There is a new sighting of the Loch Ness monster and it shows a big eel swimming near some salmon in the lake
I get how you feel Big Foot was a huge part of my young life too
Plesiosaurs would be too OP for a lake based metagame; They'd have to be banned to Anything Goes.
My friend, I know what you feel, but I respectfully think you are wrong. See, the goal of this video is to show how the supposed evidence of the monster is wrong, but this is not enough to disprove its existence.
There are many implications to the way we understand the legend by proving wrong the evidence, but the most important of them are those that help us separate what is real and what is just a product of our culture. You see, even if there are real sightings of a monster, culture shapes images that could be radically different. In other words, thinking critically about the evidence of the legend helps us to understand what is just a product of culture and prevents us from chasing an illusion. The legend is still out there, and maybe, just maybe, something really inhabits the lake, but it is not like we thougth.
So, when are you going to do the big one?
You know what it is.
(Hint: it involves feet)
I have no idea XD
TREY the Explainer You know, the _big_ one, the one famous for it's _foot._
Jacob Furrow XD oh my gosh I'm so stupid that flew right over my head
Jacob Furrow Yeti? No, wait, Chupacabra? Werewolf? What is it, dammit?!
Ross Pit: Shark Hunter I think it's a dinosaur or something
Honestly, I love the energy of the Haunted stone man. He's incredible and we need him.
A couple of years ago, on a family trip to Loch Ness, a boat operator told us that recently, on an expedition to the bottom of the Loch, the monster had been found; that is, a movie prop from an old Sherlock Holmes film, that was lost to the Loch many years ago, was discovered. I've no doubt the discoverers were initially terrified...
Yeah im one of them, scarred for life!
"Owlman."
*eye twitch*
*TRIGGERED*
2 : 50 AM for me. No sleep now, yay
"Lord of Tears"
More like lord of drinking tears
3:40 a.m
Velociraptors of Skyrim 11:9 oh look it's HOODINI
11:09
The stone is haunted.
11:12 darn you Tony! Quit trying to reveal Trey's identity as owl-man you know it upsets him ;)
2:14 I always knew there was a connection between gynecology and Nessie.
I've always thought 10:00 was an elephant's trunk sticking out of the water.
th-cam.com/video/acFd-wAl4Oc/w-d-xo.html
An elephant just randomly popping up in a lake in Scotland is actually just about as likely as the Loch Ness monster being there.
I give up, it’s no use denying it anymore. It’s my dick at attention as I did backstrokes in the cold Loch Ness. He entered a time machine and photoshopped the rest of me out.
'1993's King King'
Eh, only off by 60 years.
Make that 60
*60
only 60, not that much.
Finn Else-McCormick "King King."
Eh, only off by one letter.
what a wholesome thread.
I'm actually laughing at how many lies there are Trey, did you laugh at any of this?
There's a lot of fraud
Yes there is, and it's so funny how it gets decoded. I wonder how is it that, people can be fooled this easily.
Lagiacrus It kinda is scary to see how easily it can happen!
I guess, its still pretty funny, but I guess it's because I laugh at a lot of scary things, mostly confusion from myself and others, so I've been comparing my German Shepherd dog, to the dire wolf recently, what can you tell me about the two canines?
TREY the Explainer I would love it if you did a vid on the chupacabra next! Thanx if you see this for all the awesome vids!!!
Trey is bird, all is bird. Except birds, birds is dinosaurs.
Does that I'm a bird? Cool.
Nate Wec so I'm not a bird???
Nate Wec If everything is a bird, and birds is dinosaurs, everything is dinosaur?
SenLovesTurtles Get the scientists on this. We need answers.
Dodoraptor and other animals No you is reptile, reptiles is fish, fish is bird, all is bird.
That one pic was not a swan, it was the guys dog swimming.
I'm glad someone else pointed it out.
I remember hearing about it in a great old National geographic show called "Is it real?" The only paranormal/Cryptid themed show I can think of that actually looked at things with a real scientific and skeptical view, instead of complete sensationalist bullshit like "lost tapes","Destination truth", "ancient aliens" or "fact or faked".
Wait really? Cant distinguish the dog though
The face of a golden retriever swimming towards camera with a long stick in its mouth
@Boom Diggaty Nothing else just the swan thing
If you read Roland watsons and Steve Pamblecks analysis of the Hugh Gray photo you'll change your mind about the dog theory
Trey, happy new year everyone!
The New Year is a hoax.
thanks man!
@@MrHogGamer yeah i think new year is a Basking Shark or something
11:20 i'm going to sleep.
*sees notification*
Nope.
The Loch Ness Monster is just a log with a Halloween Mask on it.
FIamestalker Futurama right?
FIamestalker I T A L L M A K E S S E N S E N O W
Asif Kabir Actually i think is a reference to a P&F episode.
I think it is just a kids submarine toy
Or a big eel
Who needs sleep when daddy Trey uploads
✋
Ty J agreed.
TREYYYY 🤪
I like how people who usually believe these super blurt low quality photos “proves” the Loch Ness monster, but thinks that the moon landing footage was faked
Part of their logic must be that the moon landing was published by the government, whereas the cryptid photos are made and published independently
Anti-American conspiracists.
I like how the muppet one looks like he's smiling. it's like he's saying "Oh hey, buddy! Taking a picture? Dat's cool :)"
Dinsdale footage from the Dinsdale Dinnadome.
I subbed around 5 months ago and forgot to comment on how much I thoroughly enjoy your content. The first video I watched of yours was a paleo profile, I proceeded to watch every one of them. Great work :)
thanks man! I'm happy that you like my stuff ;)
Ok, if Nessie did exist, would it be a giant eel or a long necked seal? Granted, I do think that it's mostly hoaxes and other such stuff, but still.
I guess I will get my answer in Part 3
Also, owl-faced basking shark! TRIGGERED!
It would likely be a highly adapted otter
JacobKaiju with wings of course...
The question is: does in make sense for a plesiosaur to live in a lake?
DigGil3 stranger things have happened
JacobKaiju please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think there actually have been big long-necked seals in the past.
in 1983, my parents and I visited Loch Ness. I was a year old baby and have no memory, but here's what I was told. We are Koreans and my father was a diplomat. He took few days off work to go on a road trip and while traveling Scotland, decided to make a visit to Loch Ness. It was evening, and they had good time enjoying the view, but had not booked any lodging. To save money, my parents decided to sleep at car over the night, parked next to Loch Ness. Both my parents had heard stories of Loch Ness Monster, but they don't beileve in any cryptids, or any other supernatural stuff and were not concerned. That night however, they sensed something moving near the car, but were too tired to be bothered. The next day they discovered that some patches of grass not far to where car was parked were pressed as if a heavy object had been dragged over it. My parents belive to this day, someone probably moved a boat at night, as strange as it sounds, but there you go
I want a video about owlman
im so sad that it isn't real. I want u to do a video about a creature called Ningen. Its an underrated cryptid that's said to be a whale/human like creature that swims in the Arctic Ocean and spotted by from time to time.
Carnoraptor 40 you, a hybrid that Ludia created, is watching a video of someone who talks about accuracy...
Dodoraptor and other animals O H S N A P
You know I mean that someone that his "symbol" is a very inaccurate thing is in a channel that talks about accuracy...
Soundwave 84 Zamasu got triggered
He didn't say it wasn't real. He said there was barely any good evidence to support it
I was always under the impression that some of the underwater photos were of a movie prop that sank in the Lock in 1969. You actually have an image of it towards the end of the video.
No wasn’t possible at all. The prop from Sherlock Holmes had no flippers on it at all. The head was different. The camera was not in that deep of water as where they found the model at. Divers recovered the gargoyle head stump and have it in Adrian’s museum
Not to mention the location of the movie prop is in a whole other part of the loch then where the pictures were taken.
@@salvagemonster3612 oh, cool. I'll have to give that a look.
With the DNA test in the lake they pretty much killed the idea of a lochness monster. Could have been an eel though according to the results
I watched a Lochness monster documentary once I've been unable to find since. But they did this experiment where they got a bit of pipe and attached it to a buoy underwater, so it bobbed up and down vertically. They deployed it at Lochness in front of this crowd and also at a place down river. The next town over or something I cant remember. They then asked the witnesses to draw what they saw. Everyone at the other town drew a pipe. Almost everyone at lochness drew a long necked creature , some even drew humps. Its all in the mind.
Sounds like Naked Science from National Geographic. Was it the one where they asked this nerdy-sounding boy who was so disappointed it wasn't the monster?
@@omegavladosovich6757 Oh my god dude that's it! The kid comes running down from the hills thinking he'd found the monster. I've been searching for that documentary on and off since it came out in the 2000s! You Sir unlike Nessie are a real legend.
Gynaecologists perform surgeries. Not to mention the English tradition of calling most medical practices surgeries. Calling it the Surgeon's Photo was legitimate. Even if the photo was not
I lost my sh*t with Tony Doc! Awesome as always Trey.
Also, RIP, Carrie Fisher. :.(
me too XD
thanks man!
great video shame you can't make them that often
Tancred Mancini Mancini you haven't seen it all lol
Thanks man! and I wish I could too, the next video hopefully will be out this week
I already new would be great as soon as I saw the notification so I figured I would just comment it before I finished watching
Good intro!
I'm gonna make a new monster that's a giant shark owl. In your honour, I will do this.
Maybe, I'm lazy lol
I would't be so clear to say that the Gray photo is a swan. The most popular explanation is it's a labrador retriever fetching a stick, although the unretouched versions of the photo don't show a puppydog face very clearly at all. Another interpretation by Roland Watson and Steven Plambeck is that the monster's head is on the right side and is similar to that of an eel.
The High Grey photo isn't s swan, it's a water devil. It's like a dust devil, but on water.
Why would anyone dislike this vid, makes no sense
Paleo News I know right
The Dead Bird agreed
Paleo News the Loch Ness monster disliked the video
Deathhunter101 Nope. Just totally real, sensible people. I have nothing to do with that. Why would you even think I do? Really, just dumb. I mean why would I do anything like that? Totally wrong.
Because Trey tries to portray everything is fake and a hoax - The next thing he will prob try to debunk is UFOs or Underwater ruins for ancient civilzations or the global flood........or the bible?
Debunk the overrated MokeleMbembe. I always get pissed off of that inaccurate thing.
I've recently been toying with the idea of the Mokele Mbembe being a large flightless bird.
That way, it'd still be a dinosaur...just not the kind everyone was expecting ;P
Admiral Cat I believe it has been discovered they it was found to be an unknown species of rhinoceros that lives in the jungle. They are smaller than their African cousins
Wish granted
great another Trey vid(love new intro
same when I see Trey in my notifications I get so hyped lol
Mr.Dilophosaurus Wetherilli yeah he's a real good TH-camr
Thank you so much :)
he is my favorite science based TH-camr :3
TREY the Explainer no probs I hope your new year's is great
I have a friend who believes in the Loch Ness Monster. He should watch this and part 1!
I've heard a theory that the Hugh Gray photograph is actually a dog swimming towards the camera with a stick in its mouth and that if you improve the contrast, you can see the dog's face in the center of the figure.
I always drop whatever I'm doing whenever I see a new video from you. Sometimes I find myself binge watching your videos (even though i've seen them) and listening to them while I do other things. Nice job and thank you
XD thanks man! I'm happy you enjoy my videos :)
I hope you aren’t feeding a baby
@@salvagemonster3612 don't worry, I never made that mistake. Not after the first time, anyhow
After you do the 2016 video please make a vid about the science behind "XENOMORPHS"
Thank you Sir Trey for Explaining that
No problem ;)
You do animation ?
That's awesome
I expect to see more in the future ^_^
Thanks man! I did it all myself ;)
TREY the Explainer Also, happy new year :-)
07:28 "assembled a team of 60 men to kill the monster with machine guns, spears, bombs and machetes"
So in other words, your average lads night out in Glasgow.
Can't wait for another year of your vids!
11:58 You can clearly see the head of the seal on the left and people still thought it was a monster.
Easy, people are so desparate for proof of this monster that they will take any drop of "evidence" they can find in order to "prove" it exists. Doesn't matter if it's seals or a pile of sticks, they are delusional enough to believe it.
Right? The colours, the head, the dog-like muzzle... these were obviously seals. I was a young teenager when this photo was revealed, and was very fond of cryptids and supposed monster sightings... but even back then I instantly said "Aren't those just some seals out for a swim?" when I saw it.
Trey please do a video about the dinosauroid
Happy new year trey!!!!
One of the more compelling arguments, I always thought anyway, re: the first image, is that it was circus elephants taking a break in the Loch - travelling circuses were common in the 30s and there are a number of accounts of them seen swimming - the gynaecologist most probably saw one and took a picture - only afterwards realizing it looked so serpent-like and, as you say, like the sauropods from King Kong, that he thought it newsworthy. But the curvature of the neck certainly resembles an elephant's trunk. Yours, E x
There might be something in Loch Ness. People believe that krakens were just colossal squids mistaken for sea monsters. Could be a large eel, we do have eels in the UK but they're lower down in places like London.
Can you have an series on conspiracy theories? I would love for you to examine the many u.s government theories!:)
I could try ;) I'll put it on my massive list of ideas
TREY the Explainer I like the idea, you really should do it
Trey please tell us are you gonna do an annual Paleontology Recap of 2016?
I definitely am ;)
TREY the Explainer Thanks man! I think 2016 was a rather intriguing year for perfect feather preservations, unique oddball stem birds, & so much more!
Also nice step for animated intros! Next step is to evolve good sir!! ; )
Adrian M Thompson I agree, the feather preservations and possible carnivorous Ornithischians was great!
thanks man :)
TREY the Explainer Oh boy Liaoningosaurus was a surprise at first but most people (and myself included) said the paper explain the piscivory rather poorly and the evidence is actually almost disproves the notion. Mainly the location of the scales, specimens being only juveniles, and much more. Knüppe explain it the best I believe.
Also, the carnivorous sauropodomorph _Buriolestes_ & the omnivorous maniraptoran _Fukuivenator_! They were a big surprise, plus Eva with her tail encased in amber(the 🐜 was a plus).
Adrian M Thompson well said!
Why did you delete you game explained videos I loved them
Does anyone know what the music playing 2:00 is?
hey Trey; why havent you looked into the giant catfish theory for the monster?!
(check it out - viable answer for why the sightings peaked when they did and have petered out)
good video trey!
Could you do a cryptid profile on the bunyip please?
Thanks man! and the Bunyip is definitely on my list, I love Australian Folklore and mythology XD
Is Oxalaia a real dinosaur, I'm so confused or is it a juvenile spino because that's my theory
Oxalaia was from Brazil, not Egypt. No way could it be the same as Spinosaurus.
10:05 so cute! Nessie is smiling and has pearly whites
I read somewhere recently that a scientist took water samples and found DNA of giant eel, which some pictures and videos seen would probably explain it
Am I missing some previous video that explains why he was so upset about Owlman, or is that just set up for whenever he gets to that cryptid? Or is it some reference to the barn owl mothman thing
A reference to the Barn owl-Mothman thing.
"A different form and a different time" Only actual gravity falls fan will know this
Ah 2 AM, time to sleep.
*sees a new Trey cryptid video
DAMMIT!
Please to a video about the thylacine and about the chances that it is still alive (I personally think some survived).
I would love a video on thylacine! I really hope they are alive, but there's a good chance that they are not . . .
Z0LSTICE they at least have a chance, unlike most animals that humans they went extinct...
Indeed a chance. But the real problem with a lot of "Surviving" animals. Is that to not been seen in the time they have been thought to be dead. they would most likely have such a small population. That they don't have a breeding population.
Simply put. If there where some when the animal was pronounced extinct... There are most likely not any now.
Honestly, it might have a better chance than Ivory-billed woodpeckers, but still, hardly any chance.
But remember, the hula painted frog was found out to be alive (I took it as an example because it lives in a very small area at an actually not small population and was thought to be extinct for more than 60 years)
Really like that new intro! I see a lot of channels with a specific style and then come out with an intro that clashes with what they've already established, so its nice to see one that has a style that really suits their channel and works nicely with everything they've done before.
Wait - eDNA what’s the results???? What did they find in Loch Ness?
Also what about Ogopogo?
I think that a Bigfoot/Sasquatch one would be amazing, besides the fact that it's the most famous Cryptid there are some amazing photos and videos out there. I just think it would be really cool to see your take on it. Hope you see the comment, awesome video as always!
Oh thank you Trey, finally
I really like the new intro
No problem XD sorry it took so long
Thank you!
TREY the Explainer it's okay, I love your vids and I will always be here so view them.
Paleo News Awesome! thank you so much :)
Phineas and Ferb taught me that the loch ness monster is just drift wood
I'm commenting on videos from 3 years ago again. Just a thought/request/question; There's a show on Netflix entirely focused on debunking hoaxes (most of them not animal related) but they had an episode on the Loch Ness Monster, in which someone proposed that a perfect explanation would be that the sightings of the enormous monstrous creature, from shape to colouring, could in fact be catfish. Apparently not native to the loch, sports hunters introduced the catfish to the loch for fishing purposes. Fast forward about 50 years and suddenly eye witness accounts of a monster in the lake start showing up. Catfish can live up to 60 years ad the Wels Catfish (native to the Baltic, Black and Caspian seas and often introduced to Western Europe as a sport fish) can easily grow up to 5 meters.
I have not seen ANY other cryptozoology program or book even MENTION this theory but it is without a doubt the most convincing and logically sound explanation to the Loch Ness monster I have EVER heard, and I would absolutely love to hear if you have any opinions on this, either for or against the theory as I'd like to hear someone talk about this beyond a made-for-Netflix documentary as, even when debunking things, tv shows tend to be less than reliable when it comes to facts, preferring sensationalizing things for the show's agenda.
An interesting fact about Dinsdale's film that wasn't covered in this video, he also claimed that the monster was wearing a pink cap.
I
you should make a video on the ogopogo! i heard that there was recent video evidence published of it, with multiple witnesses
I live along Okanagan Lake. I saw one video that was supposed to be Ogopogo that was obviously a beaver. This is what happens when city council offers a $1M reward for proof of it.
Like Fox Muldaur, I WANT TO BELIEVE, but I just can't any more.
3:45 you said 1993 instead of 1933
Interesting, I'm just a little unsure of your sources. With all due respect, my understanding of the first image is that there was a deathbed confession, where he (said gyno guy) confessed to actually using a teapot. Then played about with angles and distance to make it look authentic, that is what I read a number of years ago.
I'm so happy you finally made another video!
3:48 "1993's King Kong" ?
It's a fat, giant swan
+Deathhunter101 no it's a barnskin sharkowl
The Winged Porpoise no it's a beer sky bark owner
+Anthony Loiacono I see you don't get it
The Winged Porpoise basically c;
Thicc swan
Okay now what if, you did a cryptid profile for lesser known cryptids, like the Flathead monster from Montana.
Could you examine the famous Loch Champlain monster photo? It has intrigued me forever, although I think there might be a rational explanation for it.
Do you have a source on your informations at 9:35 on the 1975 Rhine photo? I had never heard this anywhere before and I can't find a source for your affirmations of it being 50cm longs or part of the lake floor in the articles in your description.
This citation is from the book "Hunting Monsters: Cryptozoology and the Reality Behind the Myths" by Darren Naish and is on page 1083 on the ebook in Chapter 3 - Creatures of Loch and Lake
Thanks a lot for the prompt reply! I will have to check it out. I've read a lot about this underwater body picture as it struck me as the most convincing one ever taken. Upon further investigation, I found something that suggests the objections to it you found from the book you quoted are not indisputable : lochnessmystery.blogspot.com/2017/11/follow-up-to-1975-underwater-photos.html
That "wizard" must be a high functioning sociopath!
Imagine sitting next to him on a bus!
The Poke'Saurus Ma kind of man
Shields actually comes across more like he's purposefully trolling people with his stuff.
Like its Satire.
the stone
is haunted.....
The seat is haunted, the bus is haunted. You are haunted. Everything is haunted.
Are there any cryptids that you believe could actually exist?
Angel Flores trolls are real, they steal your socks
I'm not sure if I've found any yet. I long for the day I actually find a cryptid with compelling evidence to support its existence. From all the one's I'm aware of I can't think of any that can't just be explained via known phenomena
TREY the Explainer Once you prove a Cryptid exists, the cease to be a Cryptid.
Ross Pit: Shark Hunter exactly
TREY the Explainer the troll thing was a joke
I was always suspicious of the Loch Ness Monster evidence. Regardless, I was looking forward to this and it paid off with lots of fun.
I love that the Loch Ness muppet looks kinda like it’s got a big goofy grin
7:00
that's pretty obvious.
A: those are simply light shadows, caused by the camera, due to particles that aren't on the pic, shading the lens.
what happens is that specks of dust create shadows, which are 3D, due to dust being partly see-through.
B: water shadows cause by the water, having a bend in its angle, due to natural motion (wind and other natural elements). if there's a stripe of water that is directed away from the sun, it gets shaded.
10:19 can we make this guy a meme?
Well I'm bummed this didn't appear on my notifications and I've missed it by 6 days :(
Oh well better late than never (looking forward to what you make next, I would like to see a video on the stunk ape or the beast of bray road)
Great video!
I think in addition to the land sighting, King Kong also influenced the swan necked sightings, as did Charles Knight's art of sauropods and plesiosaurs.
Great breakdown. I used to be a believer in Nessie thanks to these photos and no critical thinking skills :)
Hoping for more cryptids: how about some mammals like Sasquatch?
Thanks man!
and Definitely, famous prehistoric reptile paints and artwork in books definitely could have effected the loch nes monster.
Me too man! I used to believe in everything from psychics to the Ropen.
I plan on doing Bigfoot in the future ;)
This is by far my favourite TH-cam series. Keep it up Trey!
thanks man! I'm happy you like it ;)
1993's King Kong which came out a few months earlier in 1933? xD