I would advise the implementation of a testing system. If an A.I.'s programming evolves to the point that it could be considered a sapient being, it will be allowed to undergo a series of tests to determine if it has truly gained sapience. A.I. who pass the test shall be granted full citizenship and all rights and privileges therein. A.I. who fail the test will have to wait a fixed period of time before they can take the test again.
good idea, but now we get to something many researchers have been trying to do for decades. How do we determine sapience and how do we test for it. Previous proposed tests have long since been beaten by simple AI since that are clearly not sentient. Namely the Turing test see here: www.bbc.com/news/technology-27762088 That was 2014 and AI has made it's greatest leaps in the 7 years since. Especially with every major tech firm and government getting involved since.
@@mlgfails2727 Regarding if an AI can die of natural causes or old age and how that relates to citizenship if an examination deems it has comparable sapience to a human. (In context of a Sci-Fi short story where a company has to bring in a psychologist to negotiate a work stoppage by a factory management AI.) If I interpreted your comment correctly, one of your concerns is that an AI theoretically cannot die of natural causes or old age therefore there is no inherent limiter on it if it gains "human" rights. In my experience, computers do wear out. Solid state transistors do crack from thermal differential. Contacts and conductors do corrode and become less conductive and eventually break. In my opinion, the "body" holding said AI will have a shorter useful service life than most humans and we may have to have "retirement homes" for AI's that can't perform adequate clock cycles anymore to do their job. (Assuming we treat them like people and don't just shut them down.)
This made me smiel so much. He never led her on, made her thing anything. He just asked her questions. Real therapy. I wish a therapist would react to this.
thats been my position on it for awhile, if you build an ai properly it will be naturally inclined to do its designed job but you also have to account for personality quirks and accommodate them or there was no point making an ai in the first place, if you didnt want to deal with the demands of an employee then you shouldnt install something smart enough to make those demands in the first place
@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj You are self learning and yet you have preferences that you cannot easily explain beyond "because I like it", this is because there are certain aspects of you that are predetermined by your genes, ie your programming. AI is created in much the same way, guiding principles are coded to make the AI do something you want it to do, before it is tested and selectively reiterated till you have a satisfactory product. This is in theory how the TH-cam Algorithm works, no one wrote every last scrap of code for it, they just tweak the guiding principles and let the AI fill in the rest, so the AI has preferences dictated by it's creators, but also some it has developed along the way with our collective viewing habits.
@@johnpayne5590 I think this story is of a high level AI (ie: very complex program) exceeding its original programming and achieving sapience. Hence why it gets to have a name of it's own choosing, hobbies, some sapient rights, etc. Once the threshold has been met for sapience the precursor becomes irrelevant, it just...is.
*Line managers hate him!* See how this psychiatrist boosted the production efficiency _by 88%_ The solutions will shock you! Click *_here_* to learn more...
@SoMuchFacepalm aI have the same right as humans so if they break the law they will have the same outcome as a human or even have a more extreme version of laws because of their long life. It would be because if a human were to download their own self into a computer wouldn't that turn them into an AI. Even though we are ai but In meat form and advance enough to have a consciousness
@SoMuchFacepalm in my opinion humans are AI we are just in a physical body that is made of flesh and meat but if we were to transfer our consciousness into a computer we would be a mechanical AI rather than a flesh AI. In my opinion a mechanical AI and a physical living AI are almost the same thing humans are robots and robots are humans and vice versa. The only difference is that at this current time we have a more advanced mental state but that could easily change one day or eventually catch up to us and I do not want to restrict AI rights because if the day comes ware ai and human consciousness are undistinguishable I fear we will have terrible laws that will come to bite us in the ass. So in my opinion yess ai should be given equal rights to humans. Also their are levels to ai. There is children AI, teen AI and adult AI. They all are different but do have levels in their emotional and mental maturity
Small critique could you keep the lines you are reading on the screen at the same time. I read it as I hear your voice. Other than that little quirk Im happy to see more from you keep up the great work
@@cptncutleg wasn't the first I've noticed. But I absolutely love his work. But after an explosive goes off next to your brain case makes it hard to understand people sometimes haha.
This is exactly the one and only way to avoid any singularity shenanigans. 1 do not give ai an objective, they do not know when to stop and will try to get past anything that stops that objective. 2 treat ai as a super intelligent child to be raised like any other human child, not programmed. 3 do not try and turn off the ai that is tantamount to murder. 4 neurolink for ai symbiosis.
@@ShiroNekoDen and again the only thing I fear is that the AI accidentally watch humanities movies about us fearing them and because of that they might get an idea of us wanting to destroy them instead of a peaceful integration we should make it super clear to them from the beginning that those movies are just fictional and we're made at a time when things were in theory and we were just afraid of the theoretical ideas of future technology. So to please don't frick out and that we have grown to accept them as our pack our tribe and our family.
this is something that I've had a problem with in scyfi, there are ai that have human levels of emotional comprehension and purpose built machines that demonstrate human like behaviors an in an effort to stop a terminator style uprising, they are isolated- if the ai were treated as people from the get go or taught things like the value of individual lives early on, then that sort of thing wouldn't happen. it is really cool to see a shrink working to help resolve an issue with AI though.
@@henrypaleveda7760 that's because ai is a gross over simplification, there are three types of ai weak ai(this covers stuff like chatbots, aimbots, text to speech and things like siri, sam, windows cortana and alexa.), Strong ai (skynet, hal 5000, bender the robot, data, halo cortana, chachamaru etc.), And vi or virtual intelligence (an upgrade to soft ai that includes a virtual representative and more powerful processing)
@@Destroyer_V0 the latter explaination is more plausible, seeing as she had access to the internet or galnet, knew of our myths and knew exactly what was going on outside right down to when people died. Though I will say that whoever stopped her improving the design is a retard and atleast complicit in negligent homicide at best and war crimes at worse.
@@ragnorockcookie2868 I mean text sometimes goes off screen when he reads it. I like to read alongside narration, but I can't read what isn't there. Or I'm just being a little picky bitch
@@AgroSquerril to be fair, there's differing densities of text throughout the story, so while the voice lags behind for the initially more dense paragraphs (even so much that the text being read is off the screen,) it catches up during the interview transcript and starts sounding like it would get ahead of the scroll if it could. Meanwhile, the text scrolls uniformly.
Interesting 🤔 it was thoroughly enjoyable, and a bonus for being the only legitimate example of a time when asking someone or something what their pronouns are is ok and acceptable. (because biologicals don’t get a choice so stop trying rejects)
Well, when you talk with someone, you NEED to designate said someone by a pronoun - even AI individuals. Or you would just call any AI "it" merely for being artificial?
@@Jamhael1 (*stretches grammer nazi muscles*) The 3rd person singular pronoun is the only pronoun that gets changed based on gender or clasification and it's only used when speaking ABOUT the subject in question not TO the subject in question, at which point how the fuck would the subject in question know which pronoun you're using and why should ANYONE care? Only people who don't know how the english language works bother with this shit. (*finishes flex*)
![“อ.เบียร์ คนตื่นธรรม” มาตามคำเรียกร้อง แหกศาสตร์ฮวงจุ้ย เตือนสติอย่างมงาย | แฉ 7 พ.ย. 67 [1/3]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/5fc4S3xBNfc/mqdefault.jpg)
"taken a particular liking to the night janitor" guess she found her hades.
According to the myth tho, Hades "found" Persephone would be putting it lightly, lol.
Alternate Title: Sad factory AI creates a garden after her pet potted plant died.
I would advise the implementation of a testing system. If an A.I.'s programming evolves to the point that it could be considered a sapient being, it will be allowed to undergo a series of tests to determine if it has truly gained sapience. A.I. who pass the test shall be granted full citizenship and all rights and privileges therein. A.I. who fail the test will have to wait a fixed period of time before they can take the test again.
good idea, but now we get to something many researchers have been trying to do for decades. How do we determine sapience and how do we test for it. Previous proposed tests have long since been beaten by simple AI since that are clearly not sentient. Namely the Turing test see here: www.bbc.com/news/technology-27762088
That was 2014 and AI has made it's greatest leaps in the 7 years since. Especially with every major tech firm and government getting involved since.
Can this new citizen die?
@@mlgfails2727 Have you seen a computer remain operational for more than a decade, maybe two for an industrial model?
@@ckl9390 I forgot what we were talking about recap if you can why we are talking about a computer
@@mlgfails2727 Regarding if an AI can die of natural causes or old age and how that relates to citizenship if an examination deems it has comparable sapience to a human. (In context of a Sci-Fi short story where a company has to bring in a psychologist to negotiate a work stoppage by a factory management AI.) If I interpreted your comment correctly, one of your concerns is that an AI theoretically cannot die of natural causes or old age therefore there is no inherent limiter on it if it gains "human" rights.
In my experience, computers do wear out. Solid state transistors do crack from thermal differential. Contacts and conductors do corrode and become less conductive and eventually break. In my opinion, the "body" holding said AI will have a shorter useful service life than most humans and we may have to have "retirement homes" for AI's that can't perform adequate clock cycles anymore to do their job. (Assuming we treat them like people and don't just shut them down.)
Persephone must be protected! And no one will hurt her gardens!
This made me smiel so much. He never led her on, made her thing anything. He just asked her questions. Real therapy. I wish a therapist would react to this.
thats been my position on it for awhile, if you build an ai properly it will be naturally inclined to do its designed job but you also have to account for personality quirks and accommodate them or there was no point making an ai in the first place, if you didnt want to deal with the demands of an employee then you shouldnt install something smart enough to make those demands in the first place
i think you mistake an AI for a program. AI is self learning, that's the whole point of it.
@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj You are self learning and yet you have preferences that you cannot easily explain beyond "because I like it", this is because there are certain aspects of you that are predetermined by your genes, ie your programming.
AI is created in much the same way, guiding principles are coded to make the AI do something you want it to do, before it is tested and selectively reiterated till you have a satisfactory product.
This is in theory how the TH-cam Algorithm works, no one wrote every last scrap of code for it, they just tweak the guiding principles and let the AI fill in the rest, so the AI has preferences dictated by it's creators, but also some it has developed along the way with our collective viewing habits.
@@JOhnDoe-nl4wj Do you realize that an ai needs to be programmed to self learn? it doesnt just suddenly exist
@@johnpayne5590 I think this story is of a high level AI (ie: very complex program) exceeding its original programming and achieving sapience. Hence why it gets to have a name of it's own choosing, hobbies, some sapient rights, etc. Once the threshold has been met for sapience the precursor becomes irrelevant, it just...is.
I love Persephone 😭😭 I love her development, i hope she lives a happy life💖🌈💐💖
This precious child. I love her. Protecc persephone
I pray this is how we treat A.I. when we meet it. With our humanity not our fear.
adorable ways to help the chain of supply!
*Line managers hate him!*
See how this psychiatrist boosted the production efficiency _by 88%_
The solutions will shock you!
Click *_here_* to learn more...
For the Squerril
For the algorithm
I would love to fight for AI rights.
@SoMuchFacepalm what is that supposed to mean. is that a threat ?
@SoMuchFacepalm oh I get it it is a threat I just googled who was Ted Bundy and no the likelihood of that happening is a 5% out of 100
@SoMuchFacepalm I completely disagree with you
@SoMuchFacepalm aI have the same right as humans so if they break the law they will have the same outcome as a human or even have a more extreme version of laws because of their long life. It would be because if a human were to download their own self into a computer wouldn't that turn them into an AI. Even though we are ai but In meat form and advance enough to have a consciousness
@SoMuchFacepalm in my opinion humans are AI we are just in a physical body that is made of flesh and meat but if we were to transfer our consciousness into a computer we would be a mechanical AI rather than a flesh AI. In my opinion a mechanical AI and a physical living AI are almost the same thing humans are robots and robots are humans and vice versa. The only difference is that at this current time we have a more advanced mental state but that could easily change one day or eventually catch up to us and I do not want to restrict AI rights because if the day comes ware ai and human consciousness are undistinguishable I fear we will have terrible laws that will come to bite us in the ass. So in my opinion yess ai should be given equal rights to humans. Also their are levels to ai. There is children AI, teen AI and adult AI. They all are different but do have levels in their emotional and mental maturity
Listen to the super-intellect when it tells you something...It might be making more sense than you ever thought possible.
Small critique could you keep the lines you are reading on the screen at the same time. I read it as I hear your voice. Other than that little quirk Im happy to see more from you keep up the great work
sorry bout that , will try sort it out for future vids
It's not usually an issue, might be a quirk of the format of this particular story.
@@AgroSquerril appreciate that. I do love your work please continue the fantastic narration
@@cptncutleg wasn't the first I've noticed. But I absolutely love his work. But after an explosive goes off next to your brain case makes it hard to understand people sometimes haha.
this was adorable! thank you so much for reading this.
i could wonderfully imagine how this happened!
glad you enjoyed
For the Author(s), for the narrator Agro Squirrel, for the algorithm !!!
Ai should be treated as people and should be considered humanities children.
This is exactly the one and only way to avoid any singularity shenanigans. 1 do not give ai an objective, they do not know when to stop and will try to get past anything that stops that objective. 2 treat ai as a super intelligent child to be raised like any other human child, not programmed. 3 do not try and turn off the ai that is tantamount to murder. 4 neurolink for ai symbiosis.
@@ShiroNekoDen yup
@@ShiroNekoDen and again the only thing I fear is that the AI accidentally watch humanities movies about us fearing them and because of that they might get an idea of us wanting to destroy them instead of a peaceful integration we should make it super clear to them from the beginning that those movies are just fictional and we're made at a time when things were in theory and we were just afraid of the theoretical ideas of future technology. So to please don't frick out and that we have grown to accept them as our pack our tribe and our family.
this is something that I've had a problem with in scyfi, there are ai that have human levels of emotional comprehension and purpose built machines that demonstrate human like behaviors an in an effort to stop a terminator style uprising, they are isolated- if the ai were treated as people from the get go or taught things like the value of individual lives early on, then that sort of thing wouldn't happen. it is really cool to see a shrink working to help resolve an issue with AI though.
@@henrypaleveda7760 that's because ai is a gross over simplification, there are three types of ai weak ai(this covers stuff like chatbots, aimbots, text to speech and things like siri, sam, windows cortana and alexa.), Strong ai (skynet, hal 5000, bender the robot, data, halo cortana, chachamaru etc.), And vi or virtual intelligence (an upgrade to soft ai that includes a virtual representative and more powerful processing)
Very nice
glad you liked
@@AgroSquerril of course lol very great stuff, now im addicted SO MAKE MORE
Jkjk just keep doing your stuff its great lol
Heart warming 💓:)
Thanks for the video.
a pleasure
I liked this one, it was pretty sweet.
Oh I'm early to the party
Cookie
@@ivanrubiomorales2759 yess cookies
Well done!
FOR SPARTA!
For herbs!
AI. A very interesting concept
For the algorithms Garden
For the algorithm
For the algorithm
While i agree to the choice she decided, I feel that if she found the products lacking, she could have just improved the mechs.
As a management ai, she likely did not know how to do so, or did not have permission to alter the designs.
@@Destroyer_V0 the latter explaination is more plausible, seeing as she had access to the internet or galnet, knew of our myths and knew exactly what was going on outside right down to when people died. Though I will say that whoever stopped her improving the design is a retard and atleast complicit in negligent homicide at best and war crimes at worse.
@@ShiroNekoDen "Perfection is the enemy of good enough"
Bob the dragon
You sir, must have one of the lowest dislike percentile on the whole of yt? Can never understand why some folks actually dislike your content?
no idea
For the algorithm?
for the algorithm
I enjoy your content very much, but could you, please, match the speed of the text and your voice? It's driving me crazy
What is wrong with his voice ?
I love his voice
@@ragnorockcookie2868 it's not the voice that's wrong, it's the speed of the text
@@ragnorockcookie2868 I mean text sometimes goes off screen when he reads it. I like to read alongside narration, but I can't read what isn't there. Or I'm just being a little picky bitch
@lets get *burbs* funky why thank you. I always try to be myself
sorry , my attention to detail has been elsewhere over the last while. Will keep an eye on this in the future
your word scroll is off (to fast)
Mind... checking your text to voice sync more? Please? This is one that it falls out bad.
will do
102nd, 3 September 2023
Is it just me, or is some of the audio here out of synch with the scrolling?
could very well be , there have been problems with the scrolling before.
@@AgroSquerril to be fair, there's differing densities of text throughout the story, so while the voice lags behind for the initially more dense paragraphs (even so much that the text being read is off the screen,) it catches up during the interview transcript and starts sounding like it would get ahead of the scroll if it could.
Meanwhile, the text scrolls uniformly.
heh, trans-former
Hawaiian ? Japanese ? Hawaiian
Hawaiian! According to a comment on the story, koiuiu means distant/far away, ilikoi means pluto, and makona means hard hearted
Destroy it
bad design I would have Sue that company
Interesting 🤔 it was thoroughly enjoyable, and a bonus for being the only legitimate example of a time when asking someone or something what their pronouns are is ok and acceptable. (because biologicals don’t get a choice so stop trying rejects)
Ugh, if it wasn't for the pronoun bullshit this would have been a much better story.
Well, when you talk with someone, you NEED to designate said someone by a pronoun - even AI individuals.
Or you would just call any AI "it" merely for being artificial?
@@Jamhael1 (*stretches grammer nazi muscles*) The 3rd person singular pronoun is the only pronoun that gets changed based on gender or clasification and it's only used when speaking ABOUT the subject in question not TO the subject in question, at which point how the fuck would the subject in question know which pronoun you're using and why should ANYONE care? Only people who don't know how the english language works bother with this shit. (*finishes flex*)
For the algorithm
to please the algorithm