Nations Worth Dying For? National Identities and the Coming of the Great War - Pierre Purseigle

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2024
  • Dr. Pierre Purseigle, historian and President of the International Society for First World War Studies, discusses the evolution of national identity and nationalism in prewar Europe, the differences between national identity and nationalism, and the changing relationship between empires, states, and their subjects/citizens.
    Presented at the World War I Historical Association Symposium, "The Coming of the Great War," November 8-9, 2013.
    Recorded November 9, 2013 in J.C. Nichols Auditorium at the National World War I Museum at Liberty Memorial.
    For more information about the National WWI Museum and Memorial visit theworldwar.org

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @jamesweldon7028
    @jamesweldon7028 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Does an Italian think of himself as an Italian in 1810, 1850, 1930? What does the title even mean? I think of how Catalonia wants to break away from Spain. What does it mean to be from Spain?

    • @GuinessOriginal
      @GuinessOriginal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ditto basque. Andalusia is very different from the rest of Spain too, like Scotland or Bavaria. Most Italians identify with their city, town or region far more strongly than their country, it’s the same in Spain

  • @kidmohair8151
    @kidmohair8151 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am of the opinion that nationalism was something that the old monarchies encouraged
    in the wake of the 1848 revolutions, so they could maintain control over their polities.
    It worked rather well....until they couldn't control the thing they had unleashed.
    But they did get another 65 years in charge.
    (and a lot of their descendants are still very very wealthy)

  • @gabirican4813
    @gabirican4813 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What was that thing about Romanian being "re-constructed" in the 19th century?

    • @jezalb2710
      @jezalb2710 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This was what happened

    • @GuinessOriginal
      @GuinessOriginal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jezalb2710 explain. What does that mean?

  • @Edax_Royeaux
    @Edax_Royeaux 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I thought Hitler had a kaiser mustache early on WWI? So he wouldn't have had that toothbrush mustache during the time of that Munich photograph.

    • @BudFieldsPPTS
      @BudFieldsPPTS 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why not? He didn't join on Day 1. When he did, he was assigned to a training reserve unit. Plenty of time for a trip to the Barber, I should think.

    • @cdnredneck99
      @cdnredneck99 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      he shaved it like that after he got gassed near the end of ww1, he thought his gas mask would work better

    • @johanneduardschnorr3733
      @johanneduardschnorr3733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      colin schnor
      Absolutely! Lots of Germans had that type of mustache during WW1 for that reason. PS, I think you are missing an “r”😊

  • @semproblemas8634
    @semproblemas8634 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did your publisher come up with that title?

  • @darthbigred22
    @darthbigred22 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm not buying people weren't excited for the war. Look at that era and the previous generations before it, they didn't see war as some great sacrifice they saw it as a way to prove oneself, a manly duty, or a great adventure.
    I think he's bringing too much of the war poets or 1960s sentiments into things and acting as if they are universal truths when history seems to indicate otherwise. Afterall if wars were so maligned, seen as pointless, or otherwise they wouldn't be fought.

    • @GuinessOriginal
      @GuinessOriginal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      With the censored propaganda narrative in the media today and the public’s eagerness to accept it, I wouldn’t be surprised if they reacted exactly the same way to the announcement of all out war again