10 Fastest Single Engine Turboprop Aircraft Of 2023

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
  • 10 Fastest Single Engine Turboprop Aircraft Of 2023
    Ever wondered about the fastest single-engine turboprop aircraft out there? Well, today is your lucky day! Welcome to our thrilling countdown of the '10 Fastest Single-Engine Turboprop Aircraft of 2023.' Get ready to be amazed as we explore these high-performance marvels that take to the skies with power and grace. From incredible speeds to cutting-edge engineering, we'll showcase the finest in aerial excellence.
    In today's video we look at 10 Fastest Single Engine Turboprop Aircraft Of 2023
    🎁 Become a WOL Member Today: bit.ly/join_wol
    🔔 Don't miss our latest jet reviews-hit the bell icon!
    👇 Enjoying the content? Consider buying me a coffee to help me creating these videos. Your support means a lot!
    ➡️ www.buymeacoff...
    Subscribe for Private Jet, Billionaire Lifestyle and Luxury Lifestyle. Inspired by King Luxury, Sam Chui and Aviation Base.
    Inspired by 10 Fastest Single Engine Turboprop Planes
    Inspired by Top 5 Single-Engine Turboprop Aircraft Over $1M 2022-2023 | Aircraft Comparison
    Inspired by 10 Fastest Single Engine Planes
    Click here to subscribe: bit.ly/Subscri...
    Thank you for your support!
    Click here to become a WOL Member today and to support our channel: bit.ly/join_wol
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 57

  • @WorldOfLuxuryOfficial
    @WorldOfLuxuryOfficial  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Click here to watch ➡ 10 Cheapest Airplanes Anyone Can Buy In 2023
    th-cam.com/video/qzjTMokBtUY/w-d-xo.html

  • @michaelmartin8331
    @michaelmartin8331 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    I wish you would spend 15 minutes in research before posting these videos. The Epic E1000 GX has a max cruise speed of 333 KTS which is 383 mph, not 325 mph like you have in the video. Also, you are talking about the Epic while showing video clips of the M600 an other airplanes. Just really annoys me to see these type of videos where the poster spends so little time on the content and could care less if it is accurate or not.

    • @antonmeyer7369
      @antonmeyer7369 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      HYPERBOLIC speech to the next level also.

    • @v3rmxxbillythenoscoperxx307
      @v3rmxxbillythenoscoperxx307 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      the script is ChatGPT written. This entire channel is AI.

    • @danmcburney3247
      @danmcburney3247 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I was going to make some of the same complaints and more but you've got it covered 😁😁

    • @rascalap2968
      @rascalap2968 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      4:50 ‘it’s a tandem seat cockpit allowing the pilot and trainee to sit side by side’, as the screen shows us the real configuration…🤦🏻‍♂️🤷‍♂️😂 This is garbage AI pushed out to make quick money for a lazy idiot…

    • @ThomStanton
      @ThomStanton 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Boasts a side-by-side cockpit..." while showing tandem front/back setup. Ugh.

  • @sjyavo
    @sjyavo หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "Tandem side by side seating..."😂😂😂

    • @TheGbelcher
      @TheGbelcher 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      The words are synonymous now

  • @richardgreen7811
    @richardgreen7811 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I just can't let it go ... The volume of errors in this video is astounding.

    • @justadreamin1004
      @justadreamin1004 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      "a tandem cockpit that allows pilots to sit side by side ?????" HUH???

    • @richardgreen7811
      @richardgreen7811 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@justadreamin1004 I stopped counting ...

  • @mikegmdw1
    @mikegmdw1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How can you say side by side when in 2 instances they're clearly tandem seating

  • @rmshivo
    @rmshivo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    For a while now, Mike Patey's Turbulence is the fastest single engine turboprop aircraft at a little over 370knots.

    • @donaldhalstead3065
      @donaldhalstead3065 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes in till mike brakes it for the engine will be worked on and?

  • @Luke-hq1pu
    @Luke-hq1pu 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Amazing, every engine is robust and has a remarkable range.

  • @justadreamin1004
    @justadreamin1004 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    A-I does it again !!!

  • @johnhaberle3375
    @johnhaberle3375 24 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    You forgot Mike Patey's Turbulence.

  • @paulsnook5408
    @paulsnook5408 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The thing is narrators always quote HP what should always most importantly say is torque. Torque is what can turns a big prop and HP carry’s it plus other things. Torque is king on power. That’s the magic secret of the Rolls Royce Merlin engine. Massive torque that made it King of aero engines!!!

  • @schlosserprofi8647
    @schlosserprofi8647 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You forgott Mike Pateys Turbolance.

  • @ReubenJonson
    @ReubenJonson 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    T-6 Texan is not "side by side " seating

  • @TheGbelcher
    @TheGbelcher 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    If combining military trainers and GA wasn’t confusing enough, the planes are ranked 10 to 1 but not by speed, all speeds are in MPH, and terms you think you know like “tandem seating” have new and sometimes opposite definitions.
    Enjoy!

  • @jkevinroll
    @jkevinroll 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Overall good information, with corrections needed as described above. One more - incorrect to say “side-by-side” for the tandem cockpit aircraft, although subsequent verbiage did clarify the obvious “tandem” seating. Suggest deleting “side-by-side” in the initial description of seating configuration.

  • @ramakrishnamuddana9548
    @ramakrishnamuddana9548 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Good Details
    It would have been better if average fuel burn at cruise speeds are mentioned

    • @WorldOfLuxuryOfficial
      @WorldOfLuxuryOfficial  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your comment. We will keep this in mind for future videos!

  • @georgealexander9427
    @georgealexander9427 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nice video but you would do well to stop referring to tandem seating as side by side.

  • @13dma1rz
    @13dma1rz 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Soooo...Pratt and Whitney makes turbo prop engines?

  • @jacol1979
    @jacol1979 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The stats on the Pilatus PC12NG are incorrect cruise is 280 knots or 322 mile per hour.

  • @LionelBrown38
    @LionelBrown38 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The T-6 has tandem seating!!

  • @GerryBarton-g9w
    @GerryBarton-g9w 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How can leave the Turbine Legend off this list? If the PC-21 earns top spot, a Garrett 331-10 powered Legend making 1150/shp will outperform every AC on this list

    • @PhilippeHerrenschmidt
      @PhilippeHerrenschmidt 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Of course not, the Pilatus PC21 is Powered by a PT6A-68B / 1600 SHP

  • @aibobebes5379
    @aibobebes5379 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There is a Pilatus PC12 NGX but is there a Pilatus P21 NGX? Confusion there!

  • @PhilippeHerrenschmidt
    @PhilippeHerrenschmidt 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    There are a lot of error in the speed announced; you are confusing knots and MPH…… and you should specify if you are talking in miles or Nautical Miles, lot’s of errors

  • @johnc8485
    @johnc8485 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Look up side by side and tandem please

  • @DogDuwer
    @DogDuwer 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    T-6 Texan is tandem seating, not side by side. :)

  • @bhidingcnfjeevananthamegma5182
    @bhidingcnfjeevananthamegma5182 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Pilots sits side by side??? Or one behind the other.?

  • @DaveTanner-d4o
    @DaveTanner-d4o หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Its not side by side - Tacano

  • @harryagrotis326
    @harryagrotis326 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What in the world do you mean it's tandem seating side by side?????

  • @michaelwong4303
    @michaelwong4303 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very impressive. But none of these can outpace a WW2 P51D or P47 😊

    • @Greg-ri3yf
      @Greg-ri3yf หลายเดือนก่อน

      As a pilot and mech, I can safely say that WW2 aircraft, F4U, P51, etc., did not motor along at 300+ mph. Yes, topped out, they could hit the 400 or so. The engines had a combat life well below 200 +/- combat hours. Where a Garrett or PT6 has well over 2000 hrs plus depending on the "program," it's on. I absolutely would love a Bearcat!!!

  • @lesindorf-904videos
    @lesindorf-904videos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Turbulence 4 is faster.

  • @sceptre357
    @sceptre357 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    whats a terber prop?

  • @eflasch
    @eflasch 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I do not think that many of the words you used mean what you think they mean.

  • @benitosegundoamor6838
    @benitosegundoamor6838 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    About the PC21NGX. You are saying that it is powered by a PT6A-68B. I am confused because you are showing a GE M601-H80 engine. Now, tell me what the truth is about the engine.

  • @thecalling1.217
    @thecalling1.217 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your speeds are wrong they should be in knots not miles per hour. For instance that pc-21 is 370 kts which is 426mph.

  • @henrymchenry1981
    @henrymchenry1981 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Que paso con el CESSNA DENALI?

  • @hugopnabais
    @hugopnabais 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @3:10 side by side?!!!!

  • @troydalton5699
    @troydalton5699 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dude you need to be talking in knots not MPH

  • @Gerhard3838
    @Gerhard3838 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In aviation we are using kts not mph !

  • @FieldWordsworth-m5n
    @FieldWordsworth-m5n 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Anderson Joseph Wilson Dorothy Robinson Linda

  • @henryreyes1856
    @henryreyes1856 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Lame list. The brasislan Tucanos are the fastest turboprop. Read more before posting your videos

    • @lesindorf-904videos
      @lesindorf-904videos 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. The American Turbulence 4 is faster. Sorry.

  • @kylewelch1039
    @kylewelch1039 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    AI trash