Disclosed, leak to NASA, told to say they discovered it now any UAP sightings will be “oh we are testing the new propulsion system, it’s all us, what aliens? Case closed”
Paul LaViolette wrote a book, twenty years ago called The Secrets of Anti-Gravity propulsion, he gives you the history of asymmetrical capacitance and its development, as well as a wealth of other oddities. I don't believe he got the credit he deserves, this story is a pat on the back for Paul.
The fact that he is doing this with less voltage than T Townsend Brown is significant in its own right. Phenomenal progress for our species. I salute him and his team.
Isn't that just a clear sign its a scam? I mean that, the lack of peer review, the claims that violate the basic laws of physics, AND this claim it's using almost no power.
This is not a breakthrough! This same technology, in the same operating description has been talked about for many decades. The difference now is that the old patents are expired and new players are attempting to re-patent them for a big payday. Anyone who's aware this tech knows the full truth behind it. I wish people would tell the FULL story.
More likely... the technology has only recently become declassified. There are probably many 'crazy' people sitting in padded cells in medically induced psychosis because they knew about this technology.
Does it matter? They aren’t handing over anything, u gotta do some work I’d imagine, idk I can’t get a mhd propulsion device to throw it out my window! 😂 but if u got the money prob like a million and no one finding out and a group of devout motivated people, let me know, all we got is drawings and small scale concepts
If this could be scaled up then use in out of atmosphere travel at a constraint thrust of 1g would mean extra planetary travel could be reduced to merely hours to several days for planets and bodies in our solar system. Estimations of travel time are below: The Moon / Luna: Closest to Earth (Supermoon): 356,577 km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 2h 22m 12s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 3h 20m 24s Mercury: Closest to Earth: 77.3 million km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 10h 52m 48s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 2d 1h 19m 12s Venus: Closest to Earth: 40 million km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 1h 5m 2s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 1d 11h 28m 48s Mars: Closest to Earth: 65 million km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 7h 58m 5s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 1d 21h 13m 1s Jupiter: Closest to Earth: 588 million km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 4d 0h 11m 2s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 5d 16h 2m 2s Saturn: Closest to Earth: 1.2 billion km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 5d 17h 25m 1s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 8d 2h 20m 24s Uranus: Closest to Earth: 2.57 billion km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 8d 9h 6m 0s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 11d 20h 24m 0s Neptune: Closest to Earth: 4.3 billion km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 10d 20h 7m 48s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 15d 7h 52m 48s Pluto: Closest to Earth: 4.28 billion km Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 10d 19h 31m 12s Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 15d 7h 1m 12s It could also mean that at a constant 1g thrust, travel to other star systems could be completed within a handful of years.
Thanks for the calculations! Really helps put the achievement into perspective. A vehicle with 1g thrust could probably catch up to Voyager in just a few months. Really hope scaling it up doesn't present too many problems.
After listening to this Im thinking we are on the right track. I would hypothesize that the UAP have discovered a few things we haven't yet so its difficult to apply the tec and get identical results because we can't fully duplicate the technology yet, but y'all are on the right track IMO. Maybe power is via a pumping action where the device powers up and then discharges every 3-4 seconds . Like an even slow heart beat .
I informed Elon musk two weeks ago , about my experiences of having been taken on board many extraterrestrial space crafts since 1957. I have shared my experience with a myriad of individuals throughout my life, not believing my experience as truth of space travel on board these alien craft . I later learned back in 1980’s about Bob Lazar’s ability to back engineer these extraterrestrial craft . Which I had recently encourage Elon Musk to Persue this free electromagnetic energy propulsion system to harness this electromagnetic energy system for his rockets . I still maintain my communication with these extraterrestrial entities to this day. Thank’s to Elon Musk , for believing in me and he has made me feel proud , by announcing this idea to our world !
My first thought on this was: if this tech becomes usable in any way, from then onwards every UFO will be written off as new experimental propulsion vehicles.
Yes, it's currently a claim. It needs to be replicated. This has happened before and not panned out. If the results are replicated by others and verified to be valid, it will be good news. until then, we should be cautious.
Exactly. It's a cycle that we must be aware of because "they"will only let get as far until "they" decide if we're ready. If not, "they" will reset us back to the stone age.
This definitely needs to be peer reviewed. Even if it is legit, I worry about the powers that be suppressing it. Technology like this should not be hidden just to be capitalized. File your patent for the technology to harness it, fine, but release all your data on how it works so your discovery can be used by others in the (not unlikely) case you and your data is destroyed.
Would this cause plasma to form outside the object, as in those night time spheres we see? Would the outside of the object being covered in a plasma cause the blurriness seen in most videos and photos? Just wondering.
I've know about Atmospheric Electrostatic energy for a few years now. For every meter up, there is a 10x voltage differential. So we basically give an object the same charge as the Earth because like charges repel?
I think there is no way they will release it to the public, I also think that if we are finding out about it, they must have had it for a long time, which makes me wonder what kind of vehicles the military have and are not telling anyone about 🤷♀️
You have it the wrong way round. An independent company with smart ex-NASA scientists uncover an amazing facet of physics we don't currently know of, and in two years you'll remember this video and won't be able to find it. Nor any mention of it online anywhere else.
If he has a patent he had to disclose everything to the world. The real problem is this violates the basic laws of physics that have been tested over centuries and thousands of tests. Somehow he's claiming an extraordinary effect missed by hundreds of particle accelerators that measure everything to an infinitesimal level. Simply by( voila!) styrafoam.
@@mrwhat5094 Coulombs Law, Newtons Laws of Motion, The law of Conservation of Energy, the laws of Electrostatics that clearly require two charged objects to generate force between them, etc.
Just because it’s new to us doesn’t mean aliens use it. I still think they use an engine that creates gravity, which would be far more efficient. If you have an onboard machine that creates gravitons you can go any direction at any speed.
Given the fact that we spent so much time with no significant technological breakthroughs. I am very much willing to bet that this new technology has likely been around for more than 30 years. And the propellantless thrust would also be a milestone for power generation systems. If this technology is something that has recently been discovered, then I do pray that they open source it. If they don't, then the technology will very likely disappear along with them.
Hi Chris this will sound picky but crude oil is not made from dead dinosaurs it's made from the plants that lived at that time. I would like to stop the dinosaur shaming. Thank you for your work and efforts it is through people like you that the truth will eventually be revealed.
I kinda see it as an electrostatic wing, akin to how a wing can create a pressure difference between the top (low pressure) of the wing and the bottom (higher pressure), so does an un balanced electrostatic field, or a specifically balance field.
ION drives have been around for a while Popular Science wrote about it years ago. The large triangular craft that have been witnessed, like the one over Phoenix are ION driven.
UFO's seem to have 2 modes: 1. Slow hover: this could be the mode powered by Electrostatics. Lots of historical cases of UFO's seen flying slow and low emitting a buzzing electric discharge like sound. This however does not explain mode 2. 2. Zero inertia: Unless this thing or another technology also reduces the craft's mass to zero OR warps space, I can't see how it can perform instantaneous acceleration, right angle turns and sudden stops. So this discovery, while humongous, would still explain only half the UFO phenomenon.
Experiments with asymmetric capacitors have shown that there is no "new force" involved. There is still something being accelerated and "thrown out the back" to produce the reaction force, and that "something" is air. Experiments in a vacuum chamber show that the thrust decreases toward zero as the pressure of the surrounding gas is decreased.
and for that UAP at the end: It's just a piece of plastic flying by in front of the camera. by the focal plane i would estimate 1 or 2 inches in diameter.
These UFO aircraft do not use this form of propulsion. The uneven charge reacts with the surrounding radiant energy, so that between them there is a relationship like the law of action and reaction. A UFO uses a different type of propulsion. In order for such an aircraft to be able to cross large interstellar distances, it must satisfy several different factors. The first is transparency for the surrounding matter, that is, it does not interact or disturb the surrounding matter in its movement. This is because at extremely high speeds the aircraft is not exposed to external radiation, micrometeorites and large material objects on its way. The second concerns the ratio of living tissue and acceleration of at least 1000 G. The way in which the aircraft accelerates does not have the characteristics of Newton's third law - the law of action and reaction. Here, the very foundation of motion energy was mastered. For example, the generation of a directed "gravitational" field brings the aircraft into a state of exceptional acceleration, but the effect is identical to free fall. Such energy simultaneously affects all particles of the aircraft and living tissue so that it does not create a difference in acceleration, and therefore pressure which we call G load. Also, since they have mastered the manipulation of this energy, they can also draw energy from the environment because everything is in motion, even space itself. There are still a lot of items that have to be satisfied, but the explanation for them still has to be more complex and you wouldn't understand me. Even this previous description is too simplified and very shallow.
Yes yes. These craft are thought to be using electromagnetism as their means of propulsion and that’s probably why their military applications are so limited. Bullets and bombs wouldn’t act like they typically do around these things. You try to drop a bomb and it sticks to your craft. You shoot a bullet and it yaws or something else that gives you an undesirable outcome. That reduces the capabilities to recon or transport. Then the shape further reduces its capability. The military is probably using them for recon on a limited basis because satellites are able to do a better job at eyeballing things. Their best at diverting the public’s attention away from what the government is really doing. Just my humble opinion
Higher dimensional beings are beyond most humans' compression. Their ability to look inside and through solid objects and space and time puts them beyond G forces and craft they use are mostly traveling through transversable wormholes. That's why air and water doesn't create drag .
because as I have been saying. gravity is the difference in dialated time. based on the density of space. change the density of the mass or the space arround it. and like water vapor. it will move away from centre of mass.
Great news, mankind is on its way to the stars at last, the interesting fact about this is its very much like what I saw a fleet of UFOs do in the Grose Valley of the Blue Mountains of NSW Australia in 1980 when a fleet touched down one by one with each slowly making their way up the valley to enter their base by moving through a solid rock face. It's clear these UFOs had the ability to move through Baryonic matter at will, which is needed if your going to travel faster then light for obvious reasons.
Once we know that propellent-less propulsion is possible, then it will encourage many more discoveries in the field, because until now serious research has been stifled by established science making such considerations taboo.
It's definitely on my hit list . I talk about Less equals more and this is becoming true . Btw less equals more is occurring every day in our normal way of life . It's about time this process is taken to Space travel
A pedantic but important point: 1G is an acceleration, not a force. It’s remarkable that he got any thrust at all, but the actual thrust in terms of lb-force or kg-force are what ultimately matters. It sounds like he got 30 grams of force which is amazing, but it detracts from the presentation, hearing 1G referred to as a force.
30 grams of force is so enormous its your most obvious clue that this is a scam. 1 gram of force would be enough for his Nobel Prize, I mean if he would submit for peer review which we know he'll never do as it will expose his grift.
Ultimately the apparatus was able to make a 1 G acceleration in order to overcome gravity or else its like another ion thruster that weights 200 lbs and produces 4 grams thrust which can't overcome gravity. There are more effective strategies that can produce 100s of tons of force in a apparatus the size of a fighter jet engine. Point of fact, if you produce a 1 G constant acceleration for 365 days you would be at velocity C.
Yeah very questionable use of terms which convey nothing about performance. I’m not buying it. Discovering a new fundamental force is an assertion that requires far more information than this.
LOL! I'm calling BS on this too. I mean, if you discover a New Force, the place to go is TH-cam and make videos that don't even show a demonstration.... as opposed to going to some Aerospace Company, or NASA or even the Military?
@@annoyboyPictures Dr. Buhler works at NASA. He and another guy have been working on this for years. I don't get how someone who works at NASA and has a doctorate can be so dumb. I don't know exactly how their experiment is set up, but I'm guessing that they have two charged plates that move apart due to Coulomb's law.
I just wanted to stop by and thank you again Chris for what you do and sticking with it.this subject is very mentally taxing and we are so very grateful for you keeping us up to date.
I also wanted to share, that this very same field was studied back in the 1920s . It's not new but the better tech and materials is why this is making progress.
I also know of a 120 year old UFO tech, where I'm still waiting on material science to make it possible. A warp field with a minimum of (positiv(!)) energy.
I hope the team that made this watches their backs. People who make things that could potentially obsolete traditional energy have a bad history of not living long.
Let's not forget that many if not most of those were con artists just trying to pull a fast one for a quick buck on grants and donations. They either got busted and had to give it up or ran away when it became obvious they were about to get it. Second thing is, the very idea that shady spooks are going around stopping everyone with a brain is absolutely ridiculous. You're seriously expecting that level of efficiency from people that can't even get their own sht straight? Also, EIGHT BILLION PEOPLE! *EIGHT BILLION* Show me ONE organization anywhere that can efficiently control the efforts of a hundred people let alone BILLIONS. You're letting your lust for conspiracy theory cloud your ability to recognize the inherent chaos and inability to coordinate that rules the human species at all levels.
They also have a bad history of being con artists. Especially when their "breakthrough" relies on a purely geometrical solution. Let's hope one of these days there will be a real one.
Whether this is a reproducible thing or not is not the issue. This kind of thing should be on the front page of every scientific journal... So that they can look at it, and understand it, do their experiments...etc.. Not bury our heads in the sand and say it doesn't exist.
Its not reproducible because its clearly a scam. Our "laws" of physics are actually models built through hundreds of years of testing, and it violates all of them. His explanation is gobbledegook, you can't exert electrostatic "pressure" against a vacuum because the electrostatic force is only created by electrons and protons exchanging virtual particles. Without particles you are "pushing" against or "pulling" from there is no force, as thousands of experiments over hundreds of years demonstrates
He doesn't want it peer reviewed, because it would expose his scam. There isn't a physicist on the planet who can't debunk his ludicrous claims within 30 seconds, given how well the electrostatic force has been tested and that he's claiming to violate the laws of conservation of energy and momentum.
Whatever else you believe this being reproducible is actually the most important thing. Otherwise it's only an unconfirmed rumor. Ironically it sounds as if this could be a major advance, if true, even if it's not reactionless. So called lifters are mostly just a curiosity due to limitations imposed by a not very aerodynamic electrode grid and low efficiency. Even if the only difference here is more efficient thrust and getting it without a grid you could still see a revolution in aerospace.
Incredible!!!! So excited! Hey I had a thought about why the UAPs are showing themselves more now - maybe they are trying to show us this exact technology IS possible, to get us off fossil fuels, etc. that seems to be their biggest message, to take better care of the earth.
They float around and get very occasionally glimpsed for a short blurry clip... just where exactly is this "Message" you're talking about coming from😂😂😂
@@notyouraveragegoldenpotato Perhaps it is is for those that understand the ramifications of what they are observing and have the background to apply those insights in order to reverse engineer the phenomena.
How long before this gets buried and we suddenly hear absolutely nothing more about it? I give it two weeks, and we’ll never hear another thing about it.
if this isn't buried, it will probably be like fuel cell technology. Lots of promises from politicians and major companies to get money and no significant change happens.
@@glennelliott708 This video is still up but that doesn't mean the subject isn't buried. The reality is that mankind has probably been producing ufos since the '40s, but that doesn't mean I can hop one to Paris.
Hope this is real! As for the UAP, looks like a balloon. The plane is going fast. Anything the plane passes would appear to go by fast, even if its just floating in the air. If the UAP passed the plane going that fast in the same direction, then we would have something.
I'm always skeptical when somebody makes an energy breakthrough and isn't dead. I hope they protect that guy behind museum glass. That video was absolutely not a drone. It's an extremely clear UAP video. If the breakthrough is legit, it could change everything, but if I were him, I'd be getting as much media coverage as possible and make sure people know he won't game-end himself.
If this propellantless thruster indeed produces at least 1 g-force (hence counteracting Earth's gravity!) in a vacuum chamber, where are the videos of it operating in full levitation? Until now, all propellantless claims were so tiny that the traces of their thrust levels were barely recorded, being deeply buried within the error bars of the background noise (and none of them moved macroscopically for the eyes to see, if you still wonder about this. Let alone take off). Thus, they were all inconclusive. Something is very, very bogus here.
The “test article” weighs 30-40g. The wiring, instrumentation & so on will weigh a lot more. The “test article” may not be able to support itself structurally. There’s a big difference between a piece of material generating 1g and a whole craft generating a net 1g. This thing won’t levitate. But it might be useful in space to generate continual net thrust over a long period of time.
We do have a little power as citizens in this country. We have to show up and vote. If every open minded caring person like the people on this feed voted. The world would change. We must take the power back 🌎 ❤
This is exactly why I say *ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE* To claim something ISNT possible, is to claim to know EVERYTHING. Crazy stuff like this is going to continue to happen over and over again forever. Things will ALWAYS seem impossible when not understood, that's what happened in our history and it's happening to us right now. We always think we know everything there is to know... until we don't. *We don't know shit*
Tommy- We know,,and we don't know..we are nit suppose to know what we know,, so disinformation, and blasphemy and defamation of character will remain. Your quotes were excellent.
This is exactly the logical fallacy called an argument from incredulity. Just because you don't know something, doesn't make it possible. We have a hundred years of scientific studies that demonstrate why this isn't possible, its a clear violation of how electrostatic forces work and the laws of conservation of momentum and energy.
To say anything is possible is a logical fallacy, we can clearly rule some things out through investigation of the universe and its properties. The basic physical rules of this universe have been confirmed through hundreds of years and millions of experiments. This guy claims to be able to break them and produce effects never seen in thousands of particle accelerator and electrostatic tests. Thats an extraordinary claim, so no one is saying it's impossible, just that it requires extraordinary evidence. Yet instead this guy has never subjected his findings to peer review or had any independent team validate his findings.
@@RandyHill-bj9pc no but we CANT. This is my point. We only THINK we can rule things out. It's what you believe is TRUTH, so there's no way you'll understand what I'm saying, and this is my whole point! Throughout history the ppl before us thought that EXACTLY like you do now. They base what they know off of what they THINK they know. Everything is subject to change, even "facts". It's always a possibility weve been looking at it wrong. Just as ppl say space is expanding, what if tomorrow they discover some weird bubble that surrounds our solar system that creates some sort of magnifying effect making us BELIEVE it was expanding. But before that point you would "100%" be certain all off of professional astronomical intelligence and experimentation that it was already a fact that was solid as stone. My whole point I'm trying to get at is that there's no way for you to even understand what I'm saying unless you wait 50 years and then look back at this comment. Think about how many billions of years the universe has been here, and through out all of the universes history only NOW, right now, we know what's going on ? lol what are the probabilities of that? I understand your not going to go back on your comment but I promise you, you are wrong and I will only prove you wrong far in the future bcuz when it does happen your going to be like OHHHHHH OK I get it now. And brother I understand your thought process bcuz I was once the same way. But once again, we don't know shit. Nothing.
It’s been patented?!? …NO! Government always confiscates patented, or attempted to be, patented devices such as this! People MUST simply Publish to the PUBLIC ALL such device findings & how they work (in a detailed manner), -so ALL that research findings IS then know to ALL, & then the knowledge WILL get out to ALL Of Mankind!
Nobody commenting here passed the 1st Uni math class? Have anybody had a look at the patent? Is full of basic calculation errors, not speaking about the "macroscopic" BS anybody could have noticed, that the thing does not even conserve the overall system momentum, which is as inviolable as the overall mass-energy conservation. Apparently, the Patent Office puts stamps on everything, as a claim, not as a fact. And, by the way, the "non-nano" versions of the system are still claimed as having quite a high force (see the graphs), they can be reproduced with 100 bucks HV and clearly measured with a 10 bucks milligram precision balance, wonder why not a demo video is included. Check for debunkers, they will appear soon.
Build it and show it. And when it overcomes Earth's gravity, I expect the whole machine to float, how heavy it might be, because it overcomes Earth's gravity. OK, just build it and show it. In the meantime we will wait and see.
1G of constant acceleration in space allows you to reach 99% the speed of light in about 1 year. You could get to nearest star system Alpha Centauri (4 LY) AND slow down in less than 6 years!!!! We could send out hundreds or thousands of 40 gram spacecraft with camera's and sensors and get video back from all the surrounding stars and exoplanet solar systems within 40 light years over the next 45 years or so. Hope they get a prototype into space immediately to prove the concept and then iterate on it rapidly, before he gets bought out and silenced by big aerospace.
I don't think this is what it sounds like. If you look at the patent drawing at 9:56 you'll see that the plates with the charge are external to the small tear-drop objects. It seems like it's a supped-up static electricity generator, like when you rub a balloon on your sweater or hair and it sticks to you. 🤷♂
Believing in UFOs is always such a sad endeavor. You have to believe advanced aliens discovered ways to break the fundamental laws of the universe in order to travel across it in reasonable amounts of time, and after expending trillions of times more energy than humans have ever made to come here, decline to make themselves known so they can just hang out and watch us from a distance like some creepy cosmic peeper.
Funny how all this technology, if true, is impossible and "violates laws" of all sorts...until it doesnt. Many of these illustrations look very similar to V Schauberger's illustrations if not identical.
Scientific Laws are only subject to our current understanding. If our understanding is put under pressure, we dont like that. Pressure is often caused by resistance. Current and resistance gives us pressure. Our lack of knowledge is what causes this resistance. Old laws may have worked because we didnt truly understand the underlying mechanisms. That doesn't mean that scientific laws cannot be broken with greater understanding.
I've built a vortex propulsion drive A rotating fluidic mass can be distorted so that 3/4 of the vortex is heavier leaving 1/4 of the vortex lighter ...the key is in the fluid speeding up to the center of rotation to compensate for the distortion of the rotating fluid Thrustless propulsion
Hmm... a magnet"s field simultaneously pushing and pulling on the magnet it's self to produce a motive force..... Let me lift myself up by picking up my own body to grab my bullshitometer from on top the fridge as soon as it stops running away from me due to more magnets on one side of it than the other.
I've seen high voltage cables jump under faulty conditions at over 350 amps also i watched on u tube some scientist guy crush a coke can with a copper ring around it using high voltages
Paul LaViolette wrote Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion and talked about the B-1 Bomber using high voltage electrically charged leading edge of the wings. Electrostatics could be similar in this case.
Dude, I read the book you mentioned and he wrote about the B2 Stealth Bomber. Not the Rockwell B1 Lancer. Please, before you write something as important as this make sure your facts are right.
Kaluza-Klein theory has a scalar force proportional to charge squared over the mass. Being a scalar, this probably needs a highly asymmetrical arrangement to realise a vector being a force in this case.
I believe this will lead us into the new wave of generating thrust for our vehicles in the sky. Until we can solve harnessing the extreme powers that may be, then the two will go hand-to-hand. Very cool content, Chris! 💯
I have been theorizing of a new propulsion that uses the gun effect that use a pulse thrust object and using some sort of slow down to absorb the kinetic energy from the projectile to produce internal thrust.
Let's see a video evidence where it moves. I'm afraid he may be making the same mistake as other inventors, patenting, rather than publishing the details, before they get him.
If true, this would be an incredible discovery that ranks up there with the greatest discoveries in world history. If false, it may be ranked as a worse hoax than cold fusion.
Discovered or Disclosed Chris?
Discovered?
Lol a possibility 😂
Definitely
Disclosure they have know this for years ass holes
Disclosed, leak to NASA, told to say they discovered it now any UAP sightings will be “oh we are testing the new propulsion system, it’s all us, what aliens? Case closed”
Paul LaViolette wrote a book, twenty years ago called The Secrets of Anti-Gravity propulsion, he gives you the history of asymmetrical capacitance and its development, as well as a wealth of other oddities. I don't believe he got the credit he deserves, this story is a pat on the back for Paul.
That's because it is too odd.
The fact that he is doing this with less voltage than T Townsend Brown is significant in its own right. Phenomenal progress for our species. I salute him and his team.
Isn't that just a clear sign its a scam? I mean that, the lack of peer review, the claims that violate the basic laws of physics, AND this claim it's using almost no power.
Is it AC or DC? ⚡️ 🔋 🔌
@@justin8894 Its MC. Magical Current.
Wait…this hasn’t been peer reviewed? That’s not a good sign.
I'm not defending the man in the video, but talking about power in volts instead of watts raises many flags. Voltage is a nothing figure on its own.
This is not a breakthrough! This same technology, in the same operating description has been talked about for many decades. The difference now is that the old patents are expired and new players are attempting to re-patent them for a big payday. Anyone who's aware this tech knows the full truth behind it. I wish people would tell the FULL story.
Are you like a crazy person?
More likely... the technology has only recently become declassified. There are probably many 'crazy' people sitting in padded cells in medically induced psychosis because they knew about this technology.
@@Chez8922-kf6cy Are you like a dumb person?
Does it matter? They aren’t handing over anything, u gotta do some work I’d imagine, idk I can’t get a mhd propulsion device to throw it out my window! 😂 but if u got the money prob like a million and no one finding out and a group of devout motivated people, let me know, all we got is drawings and small scale concepts
@@PhillyHardy My reply to you is being scrubbed.
Curious how this idea of making a offset gravitational current reminds me of how many UAP have been reported flipping onto the side when taking off...
If this could be scaled up then use in out of atmosphere travel at a constraint thrust of 1g would mean extra planetary travel could be reduced to merely hours to several days for planets and bodies in our solar system.
Estimations of travel time are below:
The Moon / Luna:
Closest to Earth (Supermoon): 356,577 km
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 2h 22m 12s
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 3h 20m 24s
Mercury:
Closest to Earth: 77.3 million km
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 10h 52m 48s
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 2d 1h 19m 12s
Venus:
Closest to Earth: 40 million km
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 1h 5m 2s
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 1d 11h 28m 48s
Mars:
Closest to Earth: 65 million km
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 1d 7h 58m 5s
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 1d 21h 13m 1s
Jupiter:
Closest to Earth: 588 million km
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 4d 0h 11m 2s
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 5d 16h 2m 2s
Saturn:
Closest to Earth: 1.2 billion km
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 5d 17h 25m 1s
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 8d 2h 20m 24s
Uranus:
Closest to Earth: 2.57 billion km
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 8d 9h 6m 0s
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 11d 20h 24m 0s
Neptune:
Closest to Earth: 4.3 billion km
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 10d 20h 7m 48s
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 15d 7h 52m 48s
Pluto:
Closest to Earth: 4.28 billion km
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, no deceleration): 10d 19h 31m 12s
Travel time (at 9.80665 m/s2, decelerating halfway): 15d 7h 1m 12s
It could also mean that at a constant 1g thrust, travel to other star systems could be completed within a handful of years.
Thanks for the calculations! Really helps put the achievement into perspective. A vehicle with 1g thrust could probably catch up to Voyager in just a few months.
Really hope scaling it up doesn't present too many problems.
This is where I invest into this company. Just imagen what it could do in 20 years.
Incredible. These thrusters may be small, but place thousands of these together and that net positive acceleration adds up.
Read the Townsend Brown biography, sounds very familiar.
I heard him mention T Townsend Brown, this seems like an updated version of his work.
Congrats Tim. And......thank you.
After listening to this Im thinking we are on the right track.
I would hypothesize that the UAP have discovered a few things we haven't yet so its difficult to apply the tec and get identical results because we can't fully duplicate the technology yet, but y'all are on the right track IMO.
Maybe power is via a pumping action where the device powers up and then discharges every 3-4 seconds . Like an even slow heart beat .
I informed Elon musk two weeks ago , about my experiences of having been taken on board many extraterrestrial space crafts since 1957. I have shared my experience with a myriad of individuals throughout my life, not believing my experience as truth of space travel on board these alien craft . I later learned back in 1980’s about Bob Lazar’s ability to back engineer these extraterrestrial craft . Which I had recently encourage Elon Musk to Persue this free electromagnetic energy propulsion system to harness this electromagnetic energy system for his rockets . I still maintain my communication with these extraterrestrial entities to this day. Thank’s to Elon Musk , for believing in me and he has made me feel proud , by announcing this idea to our world !
Musk thinks youre a nutter...He didnt have the heart to tell you that himself.
Humanity was able to develop a new form of hyper advanced propulsion before the release of GTA 6? Wow.
Hah
My first thought on this was: if this tech becomes usable in any way, from then onwards every UFO will be written off as new experimental propulsion vehicles.
This is the EM drive all over again. This is also why peer reviewed studies are imperative to science. And why replication of experiments takes place.
You think it’s not legit?
Yes, it's currently a claim. It needs to be replicated.
This has happened before and not panned out.
If the results are replicated by others and verified to be valid, it will be good news. until then, we should be cautious.
Exactly. It's a cycle that we must be aware of because "they"will only let get as far until "they" decide if we're ready. If not, "they" will reset us back to the stone age.
This definitely needs to be peer reviewed. Even if it is legit, I worry about the powers that be suppressing it. Technology like this should not be hidden just to be capitalized. File your patent for the technology to harness it, fine, but release all your data on how it works so your discovery can be used by others in the (not unlikely) case you and your data is destroyed.
@@xxxxMaddnesSxxxxgreat points
I feel like this was discovered a while ago but just put in the black.
Dude... It's not "discovered" UFO craft reverse engineering... They've been doing this for 80+ years
Would this cause plasma to form outside the object, as in those night time spheres we see? Would the outside of the object being covered in a plasma cause the blurriness seen in most videos and photos? Just wondering.
I've know about Atmospheric Electrostatic energy for a few years now. For every meter up, there is a 10x voltage differential. So we basically give an object the same charge as the Earth because like charges repel?
I think there is no way they will release it to the public, I also think that if we are finding out about it, they must have had it for a long time, which makes me wonder what kind of vehicles the military have and are not telling anyone about 🤷♀️
You have it the wrong way round. An independent company with smart ex-NASA scientists uncover an amazing facet of physics we don't currently know of, and in two years you'll remember this video and won't be able to find it. Nor any mention of it online anywhere else.
@@karadan100not in this day. There is a record of everything, not even the president's son can hide his sugar sprinkles.
If he has a patent he had to disclose everything to the world. The real problem is this violates the basic laws of physics that have been tested over centuries and thousands of tests. Somehow he's claiming an extraordinary effect missed by hundreds of particle accelerators that measure everything to an infinitesimal level. Simply by( voila!) styrafoam.
@@RandyHill-bj9pc what laws exactly
@@mrwhat5094 Coulombs Law, Newtons Laws of Motion, The law of Conservation of Energy, the laws of Electrostatics that clearly require two charged objects to generate force between them, etc.
Thanks for sharing this Chris - appreciated and grateful :)
Just because it’s new to us doesn’t mean aliens use it. I still think they use an engine that creates gravity, which would be far more efficient. If you have an onboard machine that creates gravitons you can go any direction at any speed.
Wholly crrap. Star Trek here we come. Seriously, the world will be very different in 100 years.
Star Trek was a documentary
Any working prototypes?. Very interesting.
It was acquired by reverse engineering one of the UAP's in inventory.
Isn't this a current application of the Biefeld-Brown Effect?
I hope the data gets peer reviewed and the results are repeatable when tested in independent labs. Fingers crossed for them.
Given the fact that we spent so much time with no significant technological breakthroughs. I am very much willing to bet that this new technology has likely been around for more than 30 years. And the propellantless thrust would also be a milestone for power generation systems. If this technology is something that has recently been discovered, then I do pray that they open source it. If they don't, then the technology will very likely disappear along with them.
Hi Chris this will sound picky but crude oil is not made from dead dinosaurs it's made from the plants that lived at that time. I would like to stop the dinosaur shaming. Thank you for your work and efforts it is through people like you that the truth will eventually be revealed.
Feeding the minds of the uninformed
I kinda see it as an electrostatic wing, akin to how a wing can create a pressure difference between the top (low pressure) of the wing and the bottom (higher pressure), so does an un balanced electrostatic field, or a specifically balance field.
ION drives have been around for a while Popular Science wrote about it years ago. The large triangular craft that have been witnessed, like the one over Phoenix are ION driven.
There's a video already out by one of the project scientists. He claimed it a giant gas bag vehicle with ion thrusters
@@chriscordray8572 Yes, I have read that it is a lighter than air heavy lift vehicle. It is basically a dirigible with an ION propulsion.
UFO's seem to have 2 modes:
1. Slow hover: this could be the mode powered by Electrostatics. Lots of historical cases of UFO's seen flying slow and low emitting a buzzing electric discharge like sound. This however does not explain mode 2.
2. Zero inertia: Unless this thing or another technology also reduces the craft's mass to zero OR warps space, I can't see how it can perform instantaneous acceleration, right angle turns and sudden stops.
So this discovery, while humongous, would still explain only half the UFO phenomenon.
If the ufo puts itself in a time bubble it could use method one to travel faster from our perspective but actual speed in thier own
Experiments with asymmetric capacitors have shown that there is no "new force" involved. There is still something being accelerated and "thrown out the back" to produce the reaction force, and that "something" is air. Experiments in a vacuum chamber show that the thrust decreases toward zero as the pressure of the surrounding gas is decreased.
Thank you Chris
Appreciate you so much.
and for that UAP at the end: It's just a piece of plastic flying by in front of the camera. by the focal plane i would estimate 1 or 2 inches in diameter.
❤ wow thats amazing stuff 🛸🌏🌎🌍 thats huge news!
These UFO aircraft do not use this form of propulsion. The uneven charge reacts with the surrounding radiant energy, so that between them there is a relationship like the law of action and reaction. A UFO uses a different type of propulsion. In order for such an aircraft to be able to cross large interstellar distances, it must satisfy several different factors. The first is transparency for the surrounding matter, that is, it does not interact or disturb the surrounding matter in its movement. This is because at extremely high speeds the aircraft is not exposed to external radiation, micrometeorites and large material objects on its way. The second concerns the ratio of living tissue and acceleration of at least 1000 G. The way in which the aircraft accelerates does not have the characteristics of Newton's third law - the law of action and reaction. Here, the very foundation of motion energy was mastered. For example, the generation of a directed "gravitational" field brings the aircraft into a state of exceptional acceleration, but the effect is identical to free fall. Such energy simultaneously affects all particles of the aircraft and living tissue so that it does not create a difference in acceleration, and therefore pressure which we call G load. Also, since they have mastered the manipulation of this energy, they can also draw energy from the environment because everything is in motion, even space itself. There are still a lot of items that have to be satisfied, but the explanation for them still has to be more complex and you wouldn't understand me. Even this previous description is too simplified and very shallow.
Bob Lazar deserves recognition for his bravery to tell his story... His history was erased and needs restored!!!
Yes yes. These craft are thought to be using electromagnetism as their means of propulsion and that’s probably why their military applications are so limited. Bullets and bombs wouldn’t act like they typically do around these things. You try to drop a bomb and it sticks to your craft. You shoot a bullet and it yaws or something else that gives you an undesirable outcome. That reduces the capabilities to recon or transport. Then the shape further reduces its capability. The military is probably using them for recon on a limited basis because satellites are able to do a better job at eyeballing things. Their best at diverting the public’s attention away from what the government is really doing. Just my humble opinion
FOS is a good thing. healthy skepticism is what make it possible though.
Very interesting wow
Higher dimensional beings are beyond most humans' compression. Their ability to look inside and through solid objects and space and time puts them beyond G forces and craft they use are mostly traveling through transversable wormholes. That's why air and water doesn't create drag .
This is wat Terence Howard was on about 100% .plus he has the patience 😮
Excellent, was hoping you'd talk about this. =)
because as I have been saying. gravity is the difference in dialated time. based on the density of space. change the density of the mass or the space arround it. and like water vapor. it will move away from centre of mass.
What does this to do with gravity? It's good to think about different options. We should first find out what gravity is?
Great news, mankind is on its way to the stars at last, the interesting fact about this is its very much like what I saw a fleet of UFOs do in the Grose Valley of the Blue Mountains of NSW Australia in 1980 when a fleet touched down one by one with each slowly making their way up the valley to enter their base by moving through a solid rock face. It's clear these UFOs had the ability to move through Baryonic matter at will, which is needed if your going to travel faster then light for obvious reasons.
Once we know that propellent-less propulsion is possible, then it will encourage many more discoveries in the field, because until now serious research has been stifled by established science making such considerations taboo.
It's definitely on my hit list . I talk about Less equals more and this is becoming true .
Btw less equals more is occurring every day in our normal way of life .
It's about time this process is taken to Space travel
yes , at every store , less product = more price , shrinkflation ,.
Yes, I want my hover board NOW!
A pedantic but important point: 1G is an acceleration, not a force. It’s remarkable that he got any thrust at all, but the actual thrust in terms of lb-force or kg-force are what ultimately matters. It sounds like he got 30 grams of force which is amazing, but it detracts from the presentation, hearing 1G referred to as a force.
💯. Why aren't we using Newtons, or pounds at least.
30 grams of force is so enormous its your most obvious clue that this is a scam. 1 gram of force would be enough for his Nobel Prize, I mean if he would submit for peer review which we know he'll never do as it will expose his grift.
doesn't sound legit to me.
Ultimately the apparatus was able to make a 1 G acceleration in order to overcome gravity or else its like another ion thruster that weights 200 lbs and produces 4 grams thrust which can't overcome gravity. There are more effective strategies that can produce 100s of tons of force in a apparatus the size of a fighter jet engine. Point of fact, if you produce a 1 G constant acceleration for 365 days you would be at velocity C.
Yeah very questionable use of terms which convey nothing about performance. I’m not buying it. Discovering a new fundamental force is an assertion that requires far more information than this.
Bob Lazar we are sorry
I’ll believe it when I see it actually work
Wanna sandwich while you wait?
LOL! I'm calling BS on this too. I mean, if you discover a New Force, the place to go is TH-cam and make videos that don't even show a demonstration.... as opposed to going to some Aerospace Company, or NASA or even the Military?
@@annoyboyPictures Dr. Buhler works at NASA. He and another guy have been working on this for years. I don't get how someone who works at NASA and has a doctorate can be so dumb. I don't know exactly how their experiment is set up, but I'm guessing that they have two charged plates that move apart due to Coulomb's law.
I just wanted to stop by and thank you again Chris for what you do and sticking with it.this subject is very mentally taxing and we are so very grateful for you keeping us up to date.
I also wanted to share, that this very same field was studied back in the 1920s . It's not new but the better tech and materials is why this is making progress.
In SF, electrostatic force on a starship can be used as a weapon.
Thomas Townsend Browns work, he says so himself
@@peggygilmour8905 Oh yeah, let's not forget making war. 😞
That's right, and nothing in theory is newly discovered.
I also know of a 120 year old UFO tech, where I'm still waiting on material science to make it possible. A warp field with a minimum of (positiv(!)) energy.
I hope the team that made this watches their backs. People who make things that could potentially obsolete traditional energy have a bad history of not living long.
Name one.
We are, fortunately, getting to a critical mass of awareness. The public is paying attention now.
Let's not forget that many if not most of those were con artists just trying to pull a fast one for a quick buck on grants and donations. They either got busted and had to give it up or ran away when it became obvious they were about to get it. Second thing is, the very idea that shady spooks are going around stopping everyone with a brain is absolutely ridiculous. You're seriously expecting that level of efficiency from people that can't even get their own sht straight? Also, EIGHT BILLION PEOPLE! *EIGHT BILLION* Show me ONE organization anywhere that can efficiently control the efforts of a hundred people let alone BILLIONS. You're letting your lust for conspiracy theory cloud your ability to recognize the inherent chaos and inability to coordinate that rules the human species at all levels.
They also have a bad history of being con artists. Especially when their "breakthrough" relies on a purely geometrical solution.
Let's hope one of these days there will be a real one.
@@delphicdescant it's a Fed!
Whether this is a reproducible thing or not is not the issue.
This kind of thing should be on the front page of every scientific journal...
So that they can look at it, and understand it, do their experiments...etc..
Not bury our heads in the sand and say it doesn't exist.
Right. We could have had floating cars and speeder bikes by now
Its not reproducible because its clearly a scam. Our "laws" of physics are actually models built through hundreds of years of testing, and it violates all of them. His explanation is gobbledegook, you can't exert electrostatic "pressure" against a vacuum because the electrostatic force is only created by electrons and protons exchanging virtual particles. Without particles you are "pushing" against or "pulling" from there is no force, as thousands of experiments over hundreds of years demonstrates
The military industrial complex has that suppressed for obvious reasons
He doesn't want it peer reviewed, because it would expose his scam. There isn't a physicist on the planet who can't debunk his ludicrous claims within 30 seconds, given how well the electrostatic force has been tested and that he's claiming to violate the laws of conservation of energy and momentum.
Whatever else you believe this being reproducible is actually the most important thing. Otherwise it's only an unconfirmed rumor. Ironically it sounds as if this could be a major advance, if true, even if it's not reactionless. So called lifters are mostly just a curiosity due to limitations imposed by a not very aerodynamic electrode grid and low efficiency. Even if the only difference here is more efficient thrust and getting it without a grid you could still see a revolution in aerospace.
Incredible!!!! So excited! Hey I had a thought about why the UAPs are showing themselves more now - maybe they are trying to show us this exact technology IS possible, to get us off fossil fuels, etc. that seems to be their biggest message, to take better care of the earth.
It is an amazing discovery. I hope it scales like they think it will
They float around and get very occasionally glimpsed for a short blurry clip... just where exactly is this "Message" you're talking about coming from😂😂😂
Love this notion. They are our cheerleaders.
I’m pretty sure there here scoping the place out before they takeover and enslave us, we don’t have that kind of luck for them to be on our side 😂
@@notyouraveragegoldenpotato Perhaps it is is for those that understand the ramifications of what they are observing and have the background to apply those insights in order to reverse engineer the phenomena.
YEAH FINALLY I WILL GET MY HOVERBOARD AND FLYING AND HOWERING CAR!!! 😀UHUUUUU 😀IMAGINE THE APPLICATIONS!!!!!
Yes, a real hoverboard would be sweet
How long before this gets buried and we suddenly hear absolutely nothing more about it? I give it two weeks, and we’ll never hear another thing about it.
2 weeks are up. Still on you tube. 87k views
if this isn't buried, it will probably be like fuel cell technology.
Lots of promises from politicians and major companies to get money and no significant change happens.
@@glennelliott708 This video is still up but that doesn't mean the subject isn't buried. The reality is that mankind has probably been producing ufos since the '40s, but that doesn't mean I can hop one to Paris.
That is what will happen if it gets military funding. It will all get classified and disappear.
FACTS. That or he'll go"missing"..
Yet to be independently verified.
Hey Chris!
This has been making the rounds.
Keep on it bud.
Commentary from Eric Davis, Salvatore Pais etc would be interesting....
This sounds like what Pais was talking about in his interview with Curt Jaimungal
@@donbrearley3148 ....yes, Curt's perspective would also be interesting....
OK ,,,SHOW A VIDEO PROOF THE THING IN A VACUUM HOVERING
The "Lifters" people make on youtube. . . . . same thing? They are Asymmetrical Capacitor's. Sounds a lot like Biefeld-Brown Force.
Hope this is real! As for the UAP, looks like a balloon. The plane is going fast. Anything the plane passes would appear to go by fast, even if its just floating in the air. If the UAP passed the plane going that fast in the same direction, then we would have something.
It was the duty of the journalist to bring up that possibility in that interview. Failed interview.
I'm always skeptical when somebody makes an energy breakthrough and isn't dead. I hope they protect that guy behind museum glass. That video was absolutely not a drone. It's an extremely clear UAP video. If the breakthrough is legit, it could change everything, but if I were him, I'd be getting as much media coverage as possible and make sure people know he won't game-end himself.
I think this is tech they have had a long time and it's being released in this way to save face on the governments behalf.but that's just my opinion
That didn't stop Boeing whackin that witness... That was all over the news for about 2 seconds then everyone forgot about it
You know these cylindrical black solar balloons we had back in the day?
i hope he doesn't have anything happen to him
No worries, he'll be scamming this same grift on the uneducated for years to come.
POC or GTFO. If I can't see it I don't want to hear about it. I've heard too many big fish stories from quacks.
If this propellantless thruster indeed produces at least 1 g-force (hence counteracting Earth's gravity!) in a vacuum chamber, where are the videos of it operating in full levitation? Until now, all propellantless claims were so tiny that the traces of their thrust levels were barely recorded, being deeply buried within the error bars of the background noise (and none of them moved macroscopically for the eyes to see, if you still wonder about this. Let alone take off). Thus, they were all inconclusive. Something is very, very bogus here.
The “test article” weighs 30-40g. The wiring, instrumentation & so on will weigh a lot more. The “test article” may not be able to support itself structurally. There’s a big difference between a piece of material generating 1g and a whole craft generating a net 1g. This thing won’t levitate. But it might be useful in space to generate continual net thrust over a long period of time.
@@skwdenyerAgreed. Plus, what is the power source? How much does it weigh?
@@skwdenyer but don’t you need a celestial body for it to work?
@@RichRocketMantrue it might require some THIC batteries
We do have a little power as citizens in this country. We have to show up and vote. If every open minded caring person like the people on this feed voted. The world would change. We must take the power back 🌎 ❤
This is exactly why I say *ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE*
To claim something ISNT possible, is to claim to know EVERYTHING.
Crazy stuff like this is going to continue to happen over and over again forever. Things will ALWAYS seem impossible when not understood, that's what happened in our history and it's happening to us right now. We always think we know everything there is to know... until we don't.
*We don't know shit*
Tommy- We know,,and we don't know..we are nit suppose to know what we know,, so disinformation, and blasphemy and defamation of character will remain.
Your quotes were excellent.
This is exactly the logical fallacy called an argument from incredulity. Just because you don't know something, doesn't make it possible. We have a hundred years of scientific studies that demonstrate why this isn't possible, its a clear violation of how electrostatic forces work and the laws of conservation of momentum and energy.
@@tammysmart4486 👏 👏
To say anything is possible is a logical fallacy, we can clearly rule some things out through investigation of the universe and its properties. The basic physical rules of this universe have been confirmed through hundreds of years and millions of experiments. This guy claims to be able to break them and produce effects never seen in thousands of particle accelerator and electrostatic tests. Thats an extraordinary claim, so no one is saying it's impossible, just that it requires extraordinary evidence. Yet instead this guy has never subjected his findings to peer review or had any independent team validate his findings.
@@RandyHill-bj9pc no but we CANT. This is my point. We only THINK we can rule things out. It's what you believe is TRUTH, so there's no way you'll understand what I'm saying, and this is my whole point! Throughout history the ppl before us thought that EXACTLY like you do now. They base what they know off of what they THINK they know. Everything is subject to change, even "facts". It's always a possibility weve been looking at it wrong. Just as ppl say space is expanding, what if tomorrow they discover some weird bubble that surrounds our solar system that creates some sort of magnifying effect making us BELIEVE it was expanding. But before that point you would "100%" be certain all off of professional astronomical intelligence and experimentation that it was already a fact that was solid as stone. My whole point I'm trying to get at is that there's no way for you to even understand what I'm saying unless you wait 50 years and then look back at this comment. Think about how many billions of years the universe has been here, and through out all of the universes history only NOW, right now, we know what's going on ? lol what are the probabilities of that? I understand your not going to go back on your comment but I promise you, you are wrong and I will only prove you wrong far in the future bcuz when it does happen your going to be like OHHHHHH OK I get it now. And brother I understand your thought process bcuz I was once the same way. But once again, we don't know shit. Nothing.
It’s been patented?!? …NO!
Government always confiscates patented, or attempted to be, patented devices such as this!
People MUST simply Publish to the PUBLIC ALL such device findings & how they work (in a detailed manner), -so ALL that research findings IS then know to ALL, & then the knowledge WILL get out to ALL Of Mankind!
Mr Lehto is not afraid to go there.
Congrats on finding out about this and covering this story.
okay fan girl.
Mr Lehto is not afraid to be scammed, he's the most gullible youtuber out there.
Propellantless doesn't mean it doesn't need a power source. What's the power source?
Sounds like anything that can charge these batteries back up would work. Still a ways to go as they just overcame the weight of the battery itself
Well, well, well
Nobody commenting here passed the 1st Uni math class? Have anybody had a look at the patent? Is full of basic calculation errors, not speaking about the "macroscopic" BS anybody could have noticed, that the thing does not even conserve the overall system momentum, which is as inviolable as the overall mass-energy conservation. Apparently, the Patent Office puts stamps on everything, as a claim, not as a fact. And, by the way, the "non-nano" versions of the system are still claimed as having quite a high force (see the graphs), they can be reproduced with 100 bucks HV and clearly measured with a 10 bucks milligram precision balance, wonder why not a demo video is included. Check for debunkers, they will appear soon.
Buhler?....Buhler?....Buhler?
Hah
Build it and show it.
And when it overcomes Earth's gravity, I expect the whole machine to float, how heavy it might be, because it overcomes Earth's gravity.
OK, just build it and show it.
In the meantime we will wait and see.
1G of constant acceleration in space allows you to reach 99% the speed of light in about 1 year. You could get to nearest star system Alpha Centauri (4 LY) AND slow down in less than 6 years!!!! We could send out hundreds or thousands of 40 gram spacecraft with camera's and sensors and get video back from all the surrounding stars and exoplanet solar systems within 40 light years over the next 45 years or so. Hope they get a prototype into space immediately to prove the concept and then iterate on it rapidly, before he gets bought out and silenced by big aerospace.
I don't think this is what it sounds like. If you look at the patent drawing at 9:56 you'll see that the plates with the charge are external to the small tear-drop objects. It seems like it's a supped-up static electricity generator, like when you rub a balloon on your sweater or hair and it sticks to you. 🤷♂
Excellent stuff! As a long time UFO buff, this news cheers me up! 🙂
You and me both!
Believing in UFOs is always such a sad endeavor. You have to believe advanced aliens discovered ways to break the fundamental laws of the universe in order to travel across it in reasonable amounts of time, and after expending trillions of times more energy than humans have ever made to come here, decline to make themselves known so they can just hang out and watch us from a distance like some creepy cosmic peeper.
Funny how all this technology, if true, is impossible and "violates laws" of all sorts...until it doesnt. Many of these illustrations look very similar to V Schauberger's illustrations if not identical.
Just got here. If this is true, and it feels like it is, I have one wish.
Keep this man safe.
Scientific Laws are only subject to our current understanding. If our understanding is put under pressure, we dont like that. Pressure is often caused by resistance. Current and resistance gives us pressure. Our lack of knowledge is what causes this resistance. Old laws may have worked because we didnt truly understand the underlying mechanisms. That doesn't mean that scientific laws cannot be broken with greater understanding.
Hopefully it gets accepted by our govie this time and he doesn’t fall from a window
I've built a vortex propulsion drive A rotating fluidic mass can be distorted so that 3/4 of the vortex is heavier leaving 1/4 of the vortex lighter ...the key is in the fluid speeding up to the center of rotation to compensate for the distortion of the rotating fluid Thrustless propulsion
WoW!!!
Crazy discovery yes
It's not a discovery. It's a gift to humanity.
Hmm... a magnet"s field simultaneously pushing and pulling on the magnet it's self to produce a motive force.....
Let me lift myself up by picking up my own body to grab my bullshitometer from on top the fridge as soon as it stops running away from me due to more magnets on one side of it than the other.
I've seen high voltage cables jump under faulty conditions at over 350 amps also i watched on u tube some scientist guy crush a coke can with a copper ring around it using high voltages
Paul LaViolette wrote Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion and talked about the B-1 Bomber using high voltage electrically charged leading edge of the wings. Electrostatics could be similar in this case.
If this were true for the B1, it would be for radar cross section reduction.
Dude, I read the book you mentioned and he wrote about the B2 Stealth Bomber. Not the Rockwell B1 Lancer. Please, before you write something as important as this make sure your facts are right.
@@phoenixrising4073 In the book it is talked about the B2 Stealth Bomber. Not the B1. Commenter remembered it wrong.
@@winkekatze5593 It was a long time ago and the memory has faded. Not like you have ever experienced that. Perfect people are great.
Can we see that engine in action?
Be very skeptical 🧐…very. Don’t let them spoon feed you. Trust but verify. Where they got the idea from?
Awesome briefing!!!👍🎊
Thanks 👍
Kaluza-Klein theory has a scalar force proportional to charge squared over the mass. Being a scalar, this probably needs a highly asymmetrical arrangement to realise a vector being a force in this case.
Hopefully NASA doesnt own the patent.
They don’t!
More worried about DOD.
Yeah at least NASA would me monitored. DOD and Private Contractors hidden by layers of secrecy and compartmentalization on the other hand…
It does not matter whom comes up with it. Under the current surveillance state, they own them all before you decide it works.
Give me some gallium, this tech, and a fast intense pulse lazer.
I show you something fun.
Biefeld brown effect yet again. NASA did their best to try to crush it, now someone from nasa is trying to sell it 😂
It's really hard to measure small forces...my guess is that they are in error. Not a new force, but simply a different way of interpreting it.
I believe this will lead us into the new wave of generating thrust for our vehicles in the sky. Until we can solve harnessing the extreme powers that may be, then the two will go hand-to-hand. Very cool content, Chris! 💯
Thanks for the support!
I have been theorizing of a new propulsion that uses the gun effect that use a pulse thrust object and using some sort of slow down to absorb the kinetic energy from the projectile to produce internal thrust.
Let's see a video evidence where it moves. I'm afraid he may be making the same mistake as other inventors, patenting, rather than publishing the details, before they get him.
I agree,it would be very hard to test this without actually being in space
If true, this would be an incredible discovery that ranks up there with the greatest discoveries in world history. If false, it may be ranked as a worse hoax than cold fusion.
Time will tell, we should know more this year