Chevy Fans Can’t Handle The Truth! (NEW Ford Ranger V6 vs Chevy Colorado)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 143

  • @KenMcCune-wb3jp
    @KenMcCune-wb3jp หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Chevrolet colorado looks good for midsized truck

  • @jasonmoore6448
    @jasonmoore6448 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    My 2024 Trail Boss is a pulling beast. Love it. Love the low end torque, the growling of the engine. I actually enjoyed pulling in the San Juan’s. GM for the win!

    • @toddbob55
      @toddbob55 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      GM Vehicles are absolute garbage and have been for 20+ years

  • @Jassman3536
    @Jassman3536 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    We just bought a 24 Ranger XLT 2.3 added to our fleet. We liked it so much I was contemplating trading in another Super Duty but at 45k difference I decided to keep it and picked up a Ranger XLT 4wd 2.7 for about the same coin. I use it as my daily driver to jobsites and will use the SD for the front end loaders and heavy equipment. I love the power and it feels like Im driving a G0-Cart.

    • @jeffk464
      @jeffk464 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Smaller drives better.

    • @aaronv6569
      @aaronv6569 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Im trading in my 2023 F150 Lariat for a 2025 Ranger Lariat.. i need a smaller truck, and i fit remarkably well in the ranger for a man that is 6 foot 4

  • @jeffk464
    @jeffk464 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Colorado Bison is still about the baddest offroad pickup you can buy right now. Ranger Raptor has it beat for high speed desert running but not all around.

  • @MudMonsterRacing4
    @MudMonsterRacing4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I loved my bronco black diamond with the 2.7. Great engine. Pretty quick. Ford needs to bring back the Ranger Termor

  • @andym82376
    @andym82376 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I wish the Ranger looked a little more aggressive.

  • @chrismarbrey9678
    @chrismarbrey9678 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You can get power heated seats on an XLT Ranger PLUS other packages and options are available. No sun roof regardless of trim.

  • @musclesmouse
    @musclesmouse หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I would rather have a key with ignition. I hate push button start unless it is in a Prius

  • @JimThompson-i3u
    @JimThompson-i3u หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    V-6 every time if these are the engine choices.

  • @andrewshenton6541
    @andrewshenton6541 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I would have the chevvy or gmc

  • @dhmig88
    @dhmig88 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You’re crazy to pay for either one, north of 40K, for that money get a F-150 XL with the 5.0 V8?

  • @swamp_rat_fla1126
    @swamp_rat_fla1126 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Just the looks of the ranger screams old grandpa truck.

  • @davep4610
    @davep4610 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Just a few days ago I bought a Ranger XLT with the V6. Love driving it! FYI the things you said were missing on the Ranger can be added with the XLT-high package and/or technology package. Or of course the Lariat trim has all those options included.

  • @tjdultra6982
    @tjdultra6982 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great comparison! I think Ford investing on the 2.7L Ecoboost V6 early on is now paying off. Having this as an option on the Ranger is a perfect match imho it's "Nano" for the full size segment but not so much on the midsize. It's also an underrated engine

  • @Grem135
    @Grem135 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had the 2.7 in my f150 for 8 years and it was a beast for such a small engine. Trouble free and fast. I can't imagine a small truck like the ranger with a 2.7. I bet it would be a blast to drive.

  • @aaronv6569
    @aaronv6569 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Jesus, nope just Ben.... bro you told me you were growing your hair but dang... it's getting long Ben 😂🎉

  • @pablochacon40
    @pablochacon40 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don’t off road enough to justify the bigger tires so I would buy the ranger .

  • @aaronkortes4314
    @aaronkortes4314 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They both look good but Chevy looks slightly better

  • @86309
    @86309 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    what is weird is the Chevy mileage figures are almost identical from the midsize to the fullsize 1500 Silverado with the same engine 310/430 and 8 speed.

    • @Jay-me7gw
      @Jay-me7gw หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thats probably because the Colorado is almost as wide and almost as heavy as a Silverado. All these new mid-sized trucks have a wider track width than previous mid sizers.

  • @antoniaaguilar4365
    @antoniaaguilar4365 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Do a comparison with the ranger v6 and 2025 frontier!

    • @greghale717
      @greghale717 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd take the Frontier!

    • @steve8803
      @steve8803 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@greghale717 Not after you drive them both. That 2.7 is a beast! Do some research on it. Extremely strong reliable engine.

  • @somanyroads1229
    @somanyroads1229 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Colorado = WAY better looking
    Ranger = WAY better performing

    • @treefity350
      @treefity350 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How is the Ranger way better performing?

    • @somanyroads1229
      @somanyroads1229 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@treefity350 Did ya watch the video? He said the 2.7 V6 out performs the 2.7 I4. I still prefer the Colorado myself!

    • @samsawyer4580
      @samsawyer4580 หลายเดือนก่อน

      FORD was extremely lazy with 2024 Ford Ranger. The majority of them have rusted drive trains just because Ford wanted to pinch pennies to not coat them.

    • @WoodLox
      @WoodLox หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@somanyroads1229no replacement for displacement and the in-line will have more torque naturally, both are boosted. Many compare the 5.0 Coyote to pushrod Ls/Lt’s when the Lt6 is more of a competitor but so was the ZR-1’s of the early 90’s that produced Coyote numbers. Naturally the coyotes are going to scream and put down great numbers while taking full advantage of the 10 speed with its high revving power at a cost of efficiency. So in short it will produce more out the box for a shorter period. Honda’s make faster engines than Toyota but not as durable.

  • @tjam4229
    @tjam4229 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Evaluating similar displacements, I will always choose the engine with more cylinders. It’s always going to be “smoother”, because you are dividing the engine rotations by 50% more cylinders. Think of how smooth a 4 cylinder motorcycle is compared to a v-twin Harley with the same displacement.
    For the same reason, you will usually get less engine wear and tear and thus greater longevity.
    DROP THE TURBOS!!

  • @OEMPlus
    @OEMPlus หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the 2.7 EB is an incredible powerplant. can't wait to drive a new ranger with one.

  • @hamisharchibald5270
    @hamisharchibald5270 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm quite impressed how the Colorado inside options are better and the deck lining. The
    Finder flares. I would prefer to V6 for the Power and Torque. The think a Diesel would be good (if they had option). I wonder what they difference with the figures would be.

  • @amadorbajoquinto1152
    @amadorbajoquinto1152 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have analyzed both trucks in one day personally. Talking about interior space for passengers and seems that the ranger has more space due to the center bevel on the back of both driver and front passenger seats. Which in the Colorado does not.

    • @amadorbajoquinto1152
      @amadorbajoquinto1152 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Another thing that I don’t understand on the Colorado is there is no 4Low on the Colorado LT. You need the Trailboss or higher to get 4Low on to the Colorado. On the Ford Ranger XL Trim does have the 4Low which is Ford’s starter trim for the new
      generation Ranger.

  • @matthewknight1190
    @matthewknight1190 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Ranger with the v6 would be great but it was a year or so behind the Colorado ‘23 . I went Chevy and haven’t regretted it..but my next truck may be a Ranger someday..!

  • @Jay-me7gw
    @Jay-me7gw หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was my experience with the Colorado ZR2 I drove earlier this year. The engine just doesnt seem to make the power/torque that they claim. And there are countless videos out there now that seem to back this up. Towing tests and acceleration tests where the Colorado just doesnt do what it should based on its numbers.
    I personally owned a 2014 steel body F150 Supercrew 6.5' bed with the 3.5L Ecoboost and it was MUCH stronger down low than the ZR2. I also had a 2018 F150 XLT Supercrew with the 2.7L as a rental for a week and remember being pretty impressed with it and thinking it felt at least as strong as my 2014.

  • @mattwebb6437
    @mattwebb6437 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    4 cylinders won the indy 500 30 times, some of them boosted. Less friction , all things equal.

  • @okienightstalker3145
    @okienightstalker3145 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    A closer comparison would have been a a Z71 pkg Colorado with cloth. The TB is basically just a work truck with a lift.

  • @dann7253
    @dann7253 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:35 look at the difference at the engine bays. One looks sloppy with pipes are wires crisscrossing everywhere and one looks well designed and clean. Also the infotainment system seems miles better on the Chevrolet with the ford looking last gen.

  • @OldWorldHandyman
    @OldWorldHandyman หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    great review, but which one is handling a 4x8 sheet of plywood flat on the bed? thanks.

    • @TheKasbig
      @TheKasbig หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      the ridgeline

    • @Johnsonfan169
      @Johnsonfan169 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Ridgeline

    • @OldWorldHandyman
      @OldWorldHandyman หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Johnsonfan169 and the new 2024 Ford Ranger as well.

    • @Cringer101
      @Cringer101 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My 2015 2.2l diesel transit van would pull 3 ton in the back all day long, I don't get Americans need for bigger engines

    • @OldWorldHandyman
      @OldWorldHandyman หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ this pulls 3.5 tones, but the diesel is a working horse when compared with the gas ones. And I am not American. 😉

  • @stevenhanna242
    @stevenhanna242 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Ranger all day

  • @thewireman134
    @thewireman134 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    27k on my Canyon Denali. Love it, love the 2.7T 4 banger. It's a beast. Ford.. especially Ford. no thanks I'm good! Should I mention this world class 4 cylinder GM engine has more torque than even a 5.0, 2.7, 5.3, 5.7, and even a 6.4L HEMI. Cant deny the facts, sure you could get a raptor but then your feeding it premium and getting challenged by Honda civics on city streets. How will the 4 banger hold up you ask? 5 year history in the full size Silverado and Sierra and has proven to be undeniably reliable, moreso than GM V8 offerings.. As far as mileage I acheive 25mpg daily, on occasion over 30mpg.

    • @ellerybice3787
      @ellerybice3787 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Exaggeration is not helpful, perhaps describing your pickup with realistic and reasonable words would help you with your "over the top" anxiety.

    • @thewireman134
      @thewireman134 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@ellerybice3787 you make no sense...

    • @brad4527
      @brad4527 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      This guy sounds like Harris describing his truck, just saying.
      I totally agree with you.

    • @-Nick-T
      @-Nick-T หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      the white pickup looks cooler

    • @bernardcarroll1497
      @bernardcarroll1497 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Does the Denali have an 4WD package like the Z71?

  • @alexdominguez3399
    @alexdominguez3399 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I already knew Chevy making money with 2.7L without the V6 but we had no choice with midsize truck before.

  • @steveranelli3992
    @steveranelli3992 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Should add I had a 2018 Canyon Denali and it was a great truck.

  • @tjam4229
    @tjam4229 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a Chevy BOLT Electric Vehicle…I carriered 10 sheets of 12 ft…yes, TWELVE FEET sheets of corrugated roofing panels from Home Depot. Having only 2ft extend beyond the hatch.
    These pick-up trucks couldn’t even handle that load! Who needs a mini-pick-up ?!

  • @toms5oh
    @toms5oh หลายเดือนก่อน

    How do you add heated seats after the fact?

  • @jnmcs
    @jnmcs หลายเดือนก่อน

    As someone who driven the Chevy 2.7 in a Silverado for 5 years now, I would not hesitate to trust this motor in a smaller package. I have no experience with the Ford 2.7 so I have nothing to compare unfortunately.

  • @steveranelli3992
    @steveranelli3992 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I have had way more issues with my Z71 and had none with my Ranger tremor I traded in on it. Z71 is a 2023 and the Tremor was a 2021. Drove the 2.7 Ranger and no comparison, V6 is way to go. My Z71 is a really nice truck but will be going for a 2.7 Ranger next time.

  • @SirNicholasHerron
    @SirNicholasHerron 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hi Ben, not sure if you have tested the two but I have a 2019 Ford Ranger that I've had a lot of problems with. The early rangers have well documented transmission issues and mine certainly falls in that category. I've never had issues with the 2.3 v4 but the combination of the engine and transmission has made power delivery and drivability less than ideal. So I guess my question is, do you have any opinions on if the new rangers which saw an overhaul to the transmission in mid 2023 are a big improvement over the older generation? I love my Ranger and despite all its problems, am hesitant to sell. Especially knowing that the price of them has gone up over 10K since 2019. I paid 30K for mine and mid 40's seems like a lot to consider, but if the v6 and new trans are that much better, I'm open to it. Your thoughts are appreciated. Thanks, -Nick

  • @BrandonBaecker
    @BrandonBaecker หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just to address a comment in the video. Be careful adding aftermarket heated seats to a vehicle and what brand you use. My buddy bought one of those heated seat pads for his driver seat and it burned his Tundra to the ground at the top of a mountain pass in the middle of Winter while he was out taking photos. I wasn't there, but from what I gather, by the time he realized his truck was on fire, there was nothing he could do. He had to hike miles out through the snow.

  • @johnstrand2247
    @johnstrand2247 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm pretty happy with my Colorado. Couldn't ever find a Ford Ranger anywhere near me as Ford seemed like a complete marketing failure in the US.

  • @fetterssv
    @fetterssv หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not sure how having a switch to lock the rear diff is "less features" than some relying on some algorithm to make a bad decision for me. The Ford wins in every category by this comparison.

  • @esmoglo
    @esmoglo หลายเดือนก่อน

    The general issue with the Ford eco-boost 2.7L is the amount of recalls that engine has had in conjunction with engine failures and that’s not up for debate its a fact. The GM engine probably is pretty good, but it sounds like a rental car to me and I’m not excited about that small displacement engine that GM, offers as the only option, which is why I would not buy a Colorado.

  • @WeSRT4
    @WeSRT4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Chevy looks so much better... can't believe I am saying that. Ford really needs to knock some of the vanilla off of the Ranger!

  • @gtrance3567
    @gtrance3567 หลายเดือนก่อน

    FYI, most of the turbo max torque comes in under 2000 RPMs

  • @frebnewman6403
    @frebnewman6403 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Which one comes with a moonroof?

  • @jmanultra
    @jmanultra หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m sure that Twin Turbo’s going to last.

  • @sbrodie08
    @sbrodie08 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ford does add the factory bed liner

  • @jmasoncars4452
    @jmasoncars4452 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I see what you did there, Ben. Getting the grumpy GM boys upset again.

  • @janisdurwael269
    @janisdurwael269 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Key start inconveint but less thefts that push button. Example Hyundai thefts way up due to push button start...

  • @christopherkeene3647
    @christopherkeene3647 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why the stupid center console in a small vehicle

  • @VictorRodriguez-bp7ix
    @VictorRodriguez-bp7ix หลายเดือนก่อน

    So… which out of the two trucks is the more reliable?

  • @donburton5323
    @donburton5323 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How much did Ford save by not putting a engine cover on top of that engine.Or maybe they just did away with a cover to make it easier to work on daily

  • @bernardcarroll1497
    @bernardcarroll1497 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why aren’t you comparing the FX4 with the Z71? The Trail Boss is going to get horrible gas mileage with the lift and off road tires.

    • @BenHardyCars
      @BenHardyCars  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      All I had available

  • @geezusmeatball1328
    @geezusmeatball1328 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Power of the ford ranger is a messed up teenager room of wires and vaccum engine bay 😢

  • @greghale717
    @greghale717 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    One problem still with the Ranger. ITS A FREAKING ECOBOOST!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @toddbob55
      @toddbob55 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      moms ecoboost escape has over 200k miles still going strong

  • @MichaelAllen-g9m
    @MichaelAllen-g9m หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Like both. Both are over priced.. but rather have the chevy...

  • @hamburgerhamburgerv2
    @hamburgerhamburgerv2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Too big. Even the MAVERICK is larger than the previous gen Ranger!

  • @mickeybrumfield764
    @mickeybrumfield764 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think they are very close to each other. Both drive trains seem superior in the mid- size truck market, though I would give the edge to the Ranger. The little convenience feature of the push button start lacking on the Ranger to me is a negative. You get used to leaving your key in your pocket. I think both of these trucks should be taking market share from Toyota, especially since they cost significantly less and there are deals to be had with the dealership.

  • @putz173
    @putz173 หลายเดือนก่อน

    gm looks better, more features at the same price levels, makes more torque and only 5 hp less, ranger will tow 7500 GM is 7700...10 speed is about the only perk.

  • @haze1123
    @haze1123 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Personally, I'd rather have a Nissan Frontier...
    But between these two, the Chevy looks so much better. And the Chevy interior is much better (especially the gauge display).

  • @mrt3206
    @mrt3206 หลายเดือนก่อน

    From the outside of those Canyons and Colorados they actually whine like a diesel which is a neat sound and I can say it doesn’t bother me at all, but let’s be honest for a minute, you can get a AT4 and Denali Canyon or even a ZR2 Colorado for 45k and get the beautiful interior if you’re smart enough to haggle with a dealer for 10% off 😅 if you’re paying MSRP you’re an idiot🤷‍♂️
    You would also be hard pressed to find a Ranger without Markups and dealer addons let alone a ford dealer who is willing to negotiate on them.

    • @arkhsm
      @arkhsm หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's because the Ranger is hot property right now mate !!

  • @WilliamNguyen-g8g
    @WilliamNguyen-g8g หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ford ranger looking kinda sexy tho

  • @dougwarren5471
    @dougwarren5471 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Ford comes with monthly recalls yah.

  • @namtran512
    @namtran512 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The biggest thing is that a XLT 2.7L doesn't make sense. A loaded up Colorado Trailboss 24 with every package on it is going to cost you in the neighborhood of 41-43k out the door if not less depending on your dealership pricing (with the towing/tech/safety) since those are being moved fast to make room for the upcoming 25 models that will have more amenities on the interior (heated seats/heated steering wheel/etc. that will cannibalize Z71 sales probably). An XLT with a 2.7L is going to be like 48-49 similarly packaged out with towing/tech BEFORE tax title license. At that point you're talking about basically a 10k difference in most states. Not to mention it's probably impossible to find the 2.7Ls on the lots of dealerships right now, so you're pretty much stuck with just ordering them.
    That's not even to mention that the damn truck apparently doesn't come with a trailer hitch control, which is asinine on a 50k midsize Truck.
    At that point you might as well just see if you can get a Raptor for MSRP.

    • @DirkDiggler-p5q
      @DirkDiggler-p5q หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I am currently able to find many For Rangers locally 4X4 XLT 2.7L with an MSRP of $45K marked down to $43K. The 2.7 Lariat MSRP $53K marked down to $51K. The Ford 2.7L and 10 spd is better.

    • @namtran512
      @namtran512 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@DirkDiggler-p5q I'm going to call shenanigans. These JUST hit the market. I'm in prime Truck land (dealers local to me basically are some of the largest Ford/Chevy/etc. truck dealers nation wide) and there are literally 19 near me within a 100 mile radius, and each one is 47k+ or more on the XLT. There's ZERO chance dealers are marking down off MSRP off a vehicle that just started hitting the market about 2-3 weeks ago.

    • @brad4527
      @brad4527 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think e every truck is over priced and i still think they're still pricing cars and truck like its still covid.
      Plus i think if Mr. President Donald Trump gets in office i believe car dealerships will lower there pricing.
      Dealerships are still marking up the prices in my book!!!
      so shame on them!!!!
      Frontier is still better​@namtran512

    • @gchrisb1
      @gchrisb1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My local Ford dealer has the 2.7l xlt ranger with towing and fx4 package for 42k. I'll take that.

    • @gchrisb1
      @gchrisb1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@namtran512 Zero? You are definitely wrong on that point.

  • @toddbob55
    @toddbob55 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    GM Build quality is absolute garbage and has been for a looooong time no way in hell id buy a Chevy...... Ford builds Excellent cars and trucks and so does Toyota

  • @tomcarey3457
    @tomcarey3457 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the chevy front looks much better

  • @UPdan
    @UPdan หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nissan Versa manual wreaks them both.

    • @thewireman134
      @thewireman134 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂 comment of the day. You win!

  • @davidchenette1091
    @davidchenette1091 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I rather have the 4 cylinder 2.7 🎉

  • @clemnewton9007
    @clemnewton9007 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Chevrolet screwed up when they went to junk 4 cylinder v6 is better with no turbo bs

  • @ethandearborn3760
    @ethandearborn3760 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm a Ford guy but hafta admit, the new GMs look better.

  • @timothycasey4738
    @timothycasey4738 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ford, to many "recalls" past few years. Overall both trucks are nice "midsized" 🚚

  • @thewireman134
    @thewireman134 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The ford looks like a truck version of a Nissan Sentra imo. All subjective though.

  • @EMee-i8q
    @EMee-i8q หลายเดือนก่อน

    Turbo needs to disappear. Just another expensive repair.

  • @becdbarton
    @becdbarton หลายเดือนก่อน

    Under the hood of a ford is such an ugly rats nest. They’ve got to clean it up in there some day.

  • @janisdurwael269
    @janisdurwael269 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is Chey in Receivership? Depends where you live! "Scotty" doesn't like Chev! Any vehicle maintained will last, so pick what your Dad liked and your good to go

  • @rontopp
    @rontopp หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Ranger so boring looking. Grandpa truck.

    • @thewireman134
      @thewireman134 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agree the raptor is nice, but this is super boring grampi truck for sure

  • @MayorMcCheese78
    @MayorMcCheese78 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    HAHA, Fords are the most highly overrated trucks on the market. Shit even motor trend thinks the ranger raptor is a craptor.

    • @arkhsm
      @arkhsm หลายเดือนก่อน

      According to the two lady reviewers. Men reviewers seem to like the extra 95hp the R R offers !!

  • @craigcontofalsky4387
    @craigcontofalsky4387 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Six power strokes vs four. That makes a difference. A big difference.

  • @H0CKEY604
    @H0CKEY604 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Ford Ranger is so plain looking compared to the Chevy and Taco TRD
    Ford is just a no head turner grocery getter 🫵🏼😆