ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก

#119

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2013
  • This is a tutorial and demonstration of the basics of the Resolution BW (RBW) and Video BW (VBW) functions in a Spectrum Analyzer. You may wish to review the "Basics of a Spectrum Analyzer" video if you are unfamiliar with the basic functions and block diagram of a swept spectrum analyzer. Here is the link for that video:
    • #22: Spectrum Analyzer...
    This video covers the definition of these terms, where they exist in the analyzer, what they do, and the effects they have on the displayed results.

ความคิดเห็น • 282

  • @harbselectronicslab3551
    @harbselectronicslab3551 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    For years I have still been referring trainee's to this video.....that cutout demo is still the best teaching aid I have ever seen........

    • @ALEngineer30
      @ALEngineer30 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      it really is. brilliant and very simple.

    • @toxicricardo
      @toxicricardo ปีที่แล้ว

      I’ve used spectrum analyzers for years and have always had to spend 30 mins remembering what VBW and RBW were now that’s I’ve seen this video I know I will only spend a max of 8mins and 37 seconds

  • @WizardVespian
    @WizardVespian 9 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    This is the most concise, helpful explanation I have ever found for RBW and VBW filters. I've been using spectrum analyzers for years and I'm quite familiar with their setup and use, but I've never understood what those filters actually did under the hood so to speak... until today. Thank you, and please keep making videos. Those of us who take the time to search out this information (the small crowd that we are) really do appreciate the time and energy you put into making them. Thumbs up!

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you. Be sure to let me know if you have a topic you'd like to see in a future video.

    • @WizardVespian
      @WizardVespian 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm sure I'll have lots of questions when I start college. I intend to get into RF engineering, provided I can make the grades. For now I'm just a curious satcom tech with all together too much time on my hands, and I'm thoroughly enjoying the wealth of knowledge available on TH-cam, the EEVblog (thanks Dave) and other forums. I really enjoy the in depth technical focus of your videos. I do have one question about this video. Why do we have to convert Vpp to Vrms in order to do a dBv measurement? Is there a technical reason for it, or is it just convention?

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  9 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's because the dB values always relate to power, and power is computed from rms values.

    • @WizardVespian
      @WizardVespian 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      That makes perfect sense combined with the tidbits I just learned from some other videos on the difference between Vpp and Vrms (specifically how Vrms is calculated, and why). Thanks!

  • @germibestia
    @germibestia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    when somebody knows his stuff very well, he is able to explain it in a simple, easy to understand and yet complete way.
    Here we have the perfect example.

  • @ebarnes442
    @ebarnes442 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've been teaching people how to use a spectrum analyzer and what RBW and VBW filters do for a couple of decades. This is easily the best , simplest description of it I've ever seen. Thanks!

  • @John_L
    @John_L 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I finally scratched a very long-standing itch by buying my own spectrum analyser a few weeks back. It's fascinating to run it in the shack on wide bandwidth (up to 1.5GHz) with a small telescopic antenna and see all the spectrum mush in a modern home! Your videos are an excellent way for me to rediscover the nuances of my new toy some 40 years after I last used a spectrum analyser professionally. Thank you and 73 de G3WGV.

  • @Automotive-Velocity
    @Automotive-Velocity 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    These are the best electronics videos on YT. Concise and well presented.

  • @ka1wht
    @ka1wht 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A very articulate and detailed explanation to help understand spectrum analyzer operation. Thank you, Alan.

  • @jayeshsukumaran
    @jayeshsukumaran 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for very clearly explaining what the RBW and VBW filters are. Really appreciate the time and energy you put into making such wonderfully informative videos.

  • @DucatiMTS1200
    @DucatiMTS1200 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Today’s a better day sir because you helped clearly explain the workings of RBW and VBW filtering to me. I am most appreciative 🤗.

  • @chetangaonkar7251
    @chetangaonkar7251 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is one of the best explanations of any RF fundamentals I have come across. Thank you!

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks - I hope you like more of my RF (and other) videos.

  • @rysend
    @rysend 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are one of the best teachers on youtube. Clear, concise, zero BS, visual, interesting. Thanks for sharing your knowledge!!

  • @WestCoastMole
    @WestCoastMole 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well Done Alan...The new generation of entry level Spec Analyzers are priced down to a level where a whole new group of people can obtain them. This creates a need for tutorials for both the Theory of Operation and How to Use the device and get the most out of it. This video is an excellent example of how to clearly and concisely address the matter. Thanks again

  • @trumannevercry
    @trumannevercry 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video. Explain the concepts of VBW and RBW in an easy way. Definitely recommend this video for anyone want to understand the spectrum analyzer more.

  • @cny02253
    @cny02253 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Alan, you really know how to come up with simple and elegant visual aids. Masterful, concise video showing the relatively simple concept behind the oblique phrase "Resolution Bandwidth" and the application of filters. I love filters. You can't do enough videos about filters, "Q", all that cool stuff.

  • @geperezg
    @geperezg 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good video. After 3 years in the instrumentation industry, I have finally found something to solidify these principles in my head.

  • @aeronothis5420
    @aeronothis5420 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a SATCOM guy, I thank you for the service these videos you make provide.

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your welcome - thank you for saying so.

  • @lorimeyers3839
    @lorimeyers3839 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im familiar with RF and spec ans and I’ll tell you what - it’s a very good video for a novice to watch. I think repetition and doing so every so often (it’s easy to forget setups/applications).
    In my line of work, I try to familiarize myself with Markers, Min and Max holds. Measuring channel and composite power. Eb/no, signal to noise, etc. Runnings sweeps on cables. Spec ans are also used in conjunction with signal generators (sig-gen) when testing RF equipment, fiber shelves or RF antenna paths. Blah blah.

  • @berkol1407
    @berkol1407 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thanks for the great explanation 10 years ago!

  • @gonzik2675
    @gonzik2675 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing videos! As a studying engineer seeing how things work in the real world is worth more than you can imagine. Thanks for your hard work and comprehensive tutorials!

  • @mjlorton
    @mjlorton 10 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Brilliant explanation Alan...just starting to play with my MDO analyser..searched for "frequency analyzer rbw" and look who I find?! ;-)
    Cheers, Martin.

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Martin, while the principles are largely the same, the SA in the MDO operates differently. There is no "sweep". It uses a discrete Fourier Transform (actually a Chirp-Z transform to be exact) to compute the spectrum from direct sampled data. Thus, there is no VBW function, and 'sweep time' is replaced with 'spectrum update rate.' The RBW determines the time-duration of the data record that is sent to the Chirp-Z transform.

    • @mjlorton
      @mjlorton 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      *****
      Thanks for the info Alan.

  • @robertsomerset6630
    @robertsomerset6630 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think this just helped me understand why my duplexer tuning was never as good as it could've been. Lowering the RBW would help me see the filters individually when they are right next to each other. Thank you!!!

  • @buffteethr
    @buffteethr 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video. I am currently debugging my DUT for CE compliance and this is the best explanation I have seen for VBW and RBW. Good job.

  • @petepnut
    @petepnut ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very useful and concise information, and very applicable to modern SA's such as Rigol and Siglent. Thanks! Peter G6EPN

  • @keena1326
    @keena1326 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man...best explanation of these two subjects I've come across yet.

  • @jonesthesteamuk
    @jonesthesteamuk 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best TH-cam video I've seen on how a spectrum analyser works. Clear simple description. Great stuff keep it coming!

  • @davidbeauchesne7399
    @davidbeauchesne7399 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just purchased my first spectrum analyzer and was confused by the difference between RBW and VBW. Your video explained it very well. Thank you!

  • @w2aew
    @w2aew  10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    K1MGY - good questions. I'll answer them using your numbers:
    1) It is an Advantest U3461
    2) VBW reduces the variation in the trace due to noise, it doesn't reduce the noise floor. It won't reduce the amplitude of the signals as long as the sweep speed is slow enough to allow the filter to fully charge. This is usually taken care of automatically.
    3) Reducing VBW will help uncover things that are standing "in the grass" by flattening the noisy grass around the signal. Reducing RBW will help even more by reducing the noise floor, uncovering signals that were buried below the noise.
    4) Sweep time (sweep speed) is typically linked to RBW and VBW. RBW is typically linked to SPAN. Narrow SPAN = narrow RBW = slower sweep speeds. Yes, slower sweep speeds in a swept analyzer make it easier to find transients.
    Alan

    • @DanielRojas-pf1pw
      @DanielRojas-pf1pw 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** Hey Allan,
      Thanks a lot for the great videos, as always. What practical difference is there between reducing the VBW and just plain averaging? I know that reducing the VBW is actually filtering the higher frequencies, as opposed to just plain averaging. Leaving the math aside, I notice that both approaches increase the sweep time and don't have an effect on the noise floor.
      Can you comment on the differences of both? When would I use one or the other?
      Thanks!

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Daniel Rojas You can think of the VBW as a trace smoothing filter. Thus, if you had a low level signal buried in the grass, the smoothing would likely hide the signal - while averaging would smooth out the grass but not clip the tiny signal.

    • @ernieschatz3783
      @ernieschatz3783 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is excellent. "Yes, slower sweep speeds in a swept analyzer make it easier to find transients." I have to take periodic measurements of pulsed microwave (RADAR transmitters to be exact) signals. With one of our handheld analyzers (Agilent N9344C), I have to play with the sweep speed, or the signal will pop in and out of view, or it won't display at all. The analyzer is basically DC to 20GHz and has no problem reading CW signals at any of the frequencies we check (anywhere from 700MHz to about 9 GHz). We sometimes borrow a Rohde and Schwarz FSH20 handheld that displays any signal we want to see without touching any settings. I'm wondering if there was something I missed in the spec sheet when I acquired the Agilent, or is the Rohde and Schwarz just more refined?

  • @garysavage4121
    @garysavage4121 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had never seen a description of RBW using a mask (to represent the RBW filter) over a drawing of the measured spectrum. It was very easy to understand.

  • @omgkingdano
    @omgkingdano 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    These are excellent fundamental refresher videos. Very well thought out and explained. Backed by excellent examples on real world equipment. Very nice.

  • @nickpenacl
    @nickpenacl 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is just the video that I was looking for a long time ago . Wonderful

  • @conesillyvalley7182
    @conesillyvalley7182 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Another great example of American way of teaching by super talented yet humble masters. Thank you!

    • @jimcervantes5659
      @jimcervantes5659 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What is "American way of teaching"?

    • @conesillyvalley7182
      @conesillyvalley7182 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jimcervantes5659 glad u asked. American way Of teaching is: 1) spoken by someone with both theory and practical knowledge 2) taught using actual hardware and NOT text book or black board 3) spoken from years of personal experience and not just parroting 4) taught humbly, simply, and to the point using fewest words

    • @jimcervantes5659
      @jimcervantes5659 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Baki Pest - Why do you refer to it as American?

    • @conesillyvalley7182
      @conesillyvalley7182 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jimcervantes5659 because America is number 1 in high-tech. From moon landing to smart phones, and just about anything me/you use is invented in America, definitely much more advanced than mine (india) or your (Mexico, spain?) country

    • @jimcervantes5659
      @jimcervantes5659 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Baki Pest - I am a US citizen and have received all of my education in the US, including a BS in electrical engineering. Nothing in your description seems inherently American, nor necessarily optimal depending on the circumstance. I have seen a lot of American teaching and don't recognize what you are talking about. Oh well.

  • @dhananjayw502
    @dhananjayw502 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow ! .... Very nicely explained. It cleared my doubts and will definitely help me. Thanks a lot.

  • @dougn7bfs
    @dougn7bfs 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    your visual examples coupled with your explanation as you go makes this a great tutorial, thanks!!

  • @goldfisch9199
    @goldfisch9199 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your videos are amazing. I don't understand why teachers can't expalin it that well

    • @JohnRaschedian
      @JohnRaschedian 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Teachers can usually only teach. They usually don't understand the real meaning of what they teach. Most of them time, they simply memorize things.

  • @ronaldlijs
    @ronaldlijs 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    EXCELLENT explanation Alan!!! Much appreciated on this end. I have just bought a spectrum analyzer off eBay and I think I will love it!! Keep it up!!!

  • @jipra
    @jipra 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Such a brilliant demonstration video! Very informative! Thanks w2aew, you're the best!

  • @DAVET38
    @DAVET38 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Alan. Another very useful, clear video. Found it very helpful in the use of my new spectrum analyzer; allowing me to use the equipment more effectively and more 'knowingly'. Thanks

  • @keithcoltron3171
    @keithcoltron3171 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wish I'd bumped into w2aew years ago, great teacher, great content, many, many thanks for all.

  • @gus_siles
    @gus_siles 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a brilliant explanation!! Congratulations!.. this goes straight to my classroom and lab.

  • @richarddomingos1423
    @richarddomingos1423 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks from Brazil, i'm working with BK Precision by micronix, and that video helps me a lot!!!!
    I´ll see the others videos to learn more about it!!! Thank you!

  • @shivbhalodia9711
    @shivbhalodia9711 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for such clear & concise explanation! You've saved me so much time and effort at work.

  • @jeffj2010
    @jeffj2010 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video to detail how RBW works.

  • @satyamjayanti2642
    @satyamjayanti2642 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing explanation. I have never seen such a great tutorial of a SpecAn. Thanks !!

  • @TruongNguyen-yo8qr
    @TruongNguyen-yo8qr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The block diagram, teaching materials and your way of explanation are very succinct. You are very knowledgeable. I am hoping for Oscilloscope operating tutorial video clips when you have a chance. Thank you very much.

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have MANY videos on operating oscilloscopes. Here's a playlist:
      th-cam.com/play/PL746BF38BC2E068E0.html

    • @TruongNguyen-yo8qr
      @TruongNguyen-yo8qr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@w2aew Thank you very much for the information. Please excuse me for not searching about Oscilloscope tutorials thoroughly before requesting. No matter how complex a piece of equipment, you make it so simple to understand

  • @BinaBhatt
    @BinaBhatt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful explanation, particularly with the paper prototype (Wide Band and Narrow Band). Thank you.

  • @thumbsup3096
    @thumbsup3096 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey there,
    Insanely good.
    Your video just helped me out a lot.
    Good work man, and thanks.
    Greetings from Germany

  • @wxfreak
    @wxfreak 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great demonstration really helped me understand what is happening! Thank you!

  • @jojojoy4395
    @jojojoy4395 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great presentation and illustrations. Thank you very much.

  • @bachger4289
    @bachger4289 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best explanation I've ever heard before. Thanks.

  • @randydireen3566
    @randydireen3566 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love how clear this was

  • @paulamiroy953
    @paulamiroy953 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very innovative way of explaining ! Great work !

  • @marcosbarros8069
    @marcosbarros8069 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation; concise and clear: direct to the point. Thank you!

  • @bhavemanojs
    @bhavemanojs 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the clear and concise explanation!

  • @jianjiao542
    @jianjiao542 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you! Very clear both in theory and practical. Solved my confusion for a long time.

  • @ianchong7422
    @ianchong7422 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU!!! Now I understand the different.

  • @sudhansunithmr
    @sudhansunithmr 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a pretty decent knowledge bank video. Thanks for uploading and so lucidly explaining the concepts.

  • @Sam-lc1lo
    @Sam-lc1lo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is an awesome explanation

  • @raindrop2407
    @raindrop2407 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much. It's helping me a lot in my EE courses. Your videos are so unique and informative!

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very glad to hear that my videos are helping in your coursework!

  • @NexxuSix
    @NexxuSix 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the explanation. I’m still learning a few tips and tricks from you combined with my operator’s manual on my newly acquired SA (HP8560E). I have learned a lot from you =)

  • @Rcschim
    @Rcschim 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Super well explained with just a pen and cutout cardboard. Like it a lot! thanks!

  • @positivevibes179
    @positivevibes179 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice presentation & explanation of the resolution bandwidth

  • @famossfla
    @famossfla 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Alan
    Another great informative video. Nice explanation of interaction of RBW and VBW..

  • @mklengel
    @mklengel 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great tutorial. Thanks for producing this videos. Please keep on with it.

  • @saintlouis999
    @saintlouis999 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video!!! Simple, concise and super clear!!!!! Thanks a lot.

  • @volcanowb
    @volcanowb 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I get so much from your sessions!
    Thank you!

  • @yTb2801082331
    @yTb2801082331 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you veeeeery much for this very useful video!!!!!

  • @AM-uw6br
    @AM-uw6br 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video! Both precise and coherent

  • @perrooceaniko2005
    @perrooceaniko2005 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    yes, you deserve 10 times more views …. my respect !

  • @Rainbient
    @Rainbient หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing video!!! Thank you

  • @vladorlov1207
    @vladorlov1207 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you from Russia! More happiness to your life!

  • @montecri
    @montecri ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! What an explanation! Thank you sir!

  • @g0fvt
    @g0fvt 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Someone below asked why spectrum analysers are so expensive, my one uses basically an oscilloscope mainframe but with a spectrum analyser "plugin". One of the expensive to replace parts of a spectrum analyser is the mixer, they are easily destroyed but probably the most vulnerable component. The mixers have to have a broad, flat frequency response and tend to use exotic diodes within them. Sadly I have seen spectrum analysers effectively written off due to mixer damage.
    I am sure the precision attenuators are not cheap either!

  • @raccoonnyc
    @raccoonnyc 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've never seen this explained so well.

  • @dougspurell2387
    @dougspurell2387 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very concise and nicely conveyed. Well done.

  • @tarun5632
    @tarun5632 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating, Knowledgeable and clears all doubts Thanks

  • @ironic4love
    @ironic4love 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was great , Thank you so much

  • @sciottos
    @sciottos 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful explanation and demonstration of R&V BW...3 Cheers!

  • @alvaropalomonavarro6177
    @alvaropalomonavarro6177 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just shared this with my students. Great job.

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's great! Feel free to share any of my videos with them that you might find useful. I have lots of circuit tutorials, component tutorials, test & measurement topics, and much more on my channel.

  • @RojoKiller
    @RojoKiller 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much for this ilustrative explanation, it helped me a lot!

  • @luisaruquipac.381
    @luisaruquipac.381 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best video ever! You are a hero !

    • @luisaruquipac.381
      @luisaruquipac.381 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was the last question in my last oral exam of my master degree. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

  • @JohnSmith-he5xg
    @JohnSmith-he5xg 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great videos. Thanks for taking the time to make these :)

  • @vampifrog
    @vampifrog 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    it looks like the narrow rbw filter would generate some plateaus, since the given tones stay in it for a while when it sweeps them, so the graph at the bottom would not be sharp at the top, but rather flat, but still narrower than the graph above it.

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  10 ปีที่แล้ว

      Well, not really. In reality, the filters typically have a Gaussian shape, and resulting spectrum trace of a single frequency tone will show the shape of the filter.

  • @mostlypostie1
    @mostlypostie1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sensational videos. 73!

  • @ericntsama5833
    @ericntsama5833 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent !, thank you for the detailed explanation and live demonstration

  • @rpbale
    @rpbale 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love you videos. Along the lines of filters, Tek made a notch filter plugin for calibrating their low noise oscillator years ago. The notch filter attenuated the target Freq by about -60db with a very sharp Q factor. I’d like to make one of these but don’t really I stand how to get such a narrow but deep attenuation. I bet you could make this into a great video. The Tek device was the Tektronix 067-0938-00 Notch Filter Calibration Fixture for calibrating the Tek SG505 low freq oscillator.

    • @w2aew
      @w2aew  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      High Q narrowband notch filters are tricky to make. Resonant cavities are one way - check out my video on tuning a notch type duplexer.

  • @pmblsmft2
    @pmblsmft2 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Absolutely superb explanation. Thank you!!

  • @khangau4844
    @khangau4844 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    just 1 word: beautiful !!!!

  • @hiranthini1
    @hiranthini1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation, well presented

  • @damianlawrence8430
    @damianlawrence8430 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for sharing mate. Good job

  • @rohinparkar
    @rohinparkar 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi w2aew .. Excellent explanation .. Nobody ever explained it this way to me.

  • @hercai10
    @hercai10 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome explanation!

  • @phillipng7331
    @phillipng7331 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very intuitive demo

  • @swapnilshinde7565
    @swapnilshinde7565 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video and info. its really helpful.

  • @willzhao640
    @willzhao640 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    fantastic!! such great explanation!

  • @papayeyaz
    @papayeyaz 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for posting this video I do now Understand the purpose of it.

  • @eddyfontaineyoutu100
    @eddyfontaineyoutu100 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation ! Thank you ! 👍

  • @SoddingaboutSi
    @SoddingaboutSi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So is the video bandwidth similar to the averaging on a digital scope? Very informative video, thankyou.

  • @martinmassitti9791
    @martinmassitti9791 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excelente video! Muy completo, y gracias a esto me permitio reforzar conocimientos. Gracias

  • @ruhnet
    @ruhnet 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, exactly what I needed. Thanks!

  • @k1mgy
    @k1mgy 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alan, fascinating. A few questions from this presentation:
    1. What is model of analyzer for demo?
    2. If video bandwidth is reduced the amplitude of noise is also reduced and as it is a low pass filter is there a slight reduction in overall amplitude (and therefore accuracy)?
    3. You mentioned reducing video bandwidth might uncover stuff that would be masked in the noise. You mean a transient that does not go above the noise floor (of previous wider bandwidth)?
    4. Would reducing the sweep span (I should watch prior video as term is not known) reduce horizontal sweep time and therefore increase resolution of transients?
    Many thanks for considering my questions!
    /k1mgy