ACCA: AFM,Washi Co September 2018, Amberle co December 2018

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 28

  • @tmlundyx
    @tmlundyx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    M&A with you... I never knew M&A could be so simple. Thank you sooo much✌👏👏

  • @sadafabid828
    @sadafabid828 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you soooooo much sir..for this precious session..

  • @muhammadrafeeq4414
    @muhammadrafeeq4414 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very much learning provide us on sessions 😀 sir thank you so much

  • @janicedsilva2857
    @janicedsilva2857 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot. This was extremely beneficial

  • @achuthanunnirajendrakumar6135
    @achuthanunnirajendrakumar6135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello,
    At 1:03:07, you have taken the midpoint between the bid and ask rates which is 0.72, but in the Kaplan kit, they have used the bid rate of 0.70. Are both approaches acceptable?
    Thank you.

    • @preproots
      @preproots  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, a short cut

  • @ACCAWITH_HS
    @ACCAWITH_HS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are we not discounting the first outflow as it is also suppose to happen after a year only

  • @karthikeyanadavati8756
    @karthikeyanadavati8756 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi sir. Can you pls share those questions again here or can you let me know where did u share them please

  • @chinmaysachdev1602
    @chinmaysachdev1602 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi sir, could u please share those all 25-26 questions please

  • @nooryaonlinestore739
    @nooryaonlinestore739 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are this put option?my understanding if its receive amount its call option.may i wrong

  • @FoodiUss
    @FoodiUss 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amberle co solution why we have not calculated tax shield lost as other questions of npv

    • @elcapitan8769
      @elcapitan8769 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because tax is paid in the next year I guess. So annuity factor is to be worked out separately

  • @anmolarora8597
    @anmolarora8597 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much

  • @bilaalh
    @bilaalh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The subsidised loan has an issue cost hence the gross subsidised loan amount in is 82.4Mn. Why isn’t this value used in calculating the tax saving due to interest and also the subsidy benefit?

    • @cooldude1042
      @cooldude1042 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is because interest (and therefore tax savings) are based on the nominal value of the loan. In this case, it is 80 Mill, and so the interest amount and therefore tax savings will be based on this amount.

  • @joelaking
    @joelaking 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video. Where can the 25-26 question list be gotten?

  • @ninsiimamaria2140
    @ninsiimamaria2140 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I understand we used the average rate here..But we if use the other rates,why did they choose to use bid rate???

    • @preproots
      @preproots  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      0.70 should be used for cost and 0.74 for receipts but unfortunately he used one rate for both cost and inflows, that why I recommend to use average rate

  • @yashjain4038
    @yashjain4038 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sir, how do we know that we need ARD/JPY ? Why cant this be JPY/ARD ?

    • @elcapitan8769
      @elcapitan8769 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We just need to change the calculation accordingly. Do opposite (Multiplication) in case of ARD/JPY.

  • @Zerooo00006
    @Zerooo00006 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks.
    Very useful video lecture.

  • @mirzaha4590
    @mirzaha4590 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    sir APV is wrong on Amberle.
    You didn't take account of benefit on subsidized loan.

    • @mirzaha4590
      @mirzaha4590 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sir I think it is better you should review the answer once again.

    • @mirzaha4590
      @mirzaha4590 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Financing side effects consist present values of issue cost, tax savings on both and after tax subsidized loan benefit.

  • @anantmuthukumar2420
    @anantmuthukumar2420 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir please upload the notes at 38:58

  • @gayathryajith6786
    @gayathryajith6786 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u sooo much sir