And do you really think a human was in the seat of the target aircraft? Now, put this scenario in the context of a Carrier Group. What dose each ship cost? Just to build one? Next, imagine that volume of fire from multiple points and angles. To me, the Cost of the ammunition is MORE than woth the lives of the men aboard the ships. Then there is the loss of a ship. Years to build JUST ONE. HUSH, oh great ignorant one.
Yep not cost effect at all plus the platform wouldn’t stor or fire that many rounds with a catastrophic breakdown it went melt tye barrels and also discharge ammo gos or the heat involved, nice graphics though I’m no gamer just like my guns ( safety 1st guys). Bloodybfpell checker ain't worth BMA damn pemmuhy
Without a doubt, this is video game footage. C-RAM has been deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan against enemies with zero aircraft. It deals with missiles and artillery and mortar rounds.
Those should be a trio so the other two can get out front and save some rounds. It would also be good to one or two below the ridge across the chanel programed to eliminate the possibility of friendly fire.
I'm no expert on this and I am not qualified but, to me that seems to be an over abundance of ammo being used and the ratio of hit verses miss. I hope that system can be honed in better than this!
So, are you going to attempt to attack the ship and group of ships with that capability? Would you dare to say that the ammunition to protect an American War Ship costs too much? Please stop.
It's not really meant for shooting down Jets which could easily fly above it's range and bomb it to bits. I don't think the real deal could fire that many rounds without reloading. It's not just the 2.6 million dollars with the rounds that $96,000 shots would be it's the crew of eight it takes to run the generator maintain the gun and radars and keep the hydraulics working. It's good for defending a base from a surprise attack but it's not what you would use on a routine basis. You could get the crew down to three and still give those three soldiers seven stingers each and they could probably shoot down a jet and a helicopter with stingers to spare. Especially if the jet wants to drop down below 10,000 ft to get within the effective range of the c ran. The best use of money is not to put soldiers in harm's Way in the first place.
Pretty sure the cram has better tracking capabilities using radar. They shoot down incoming missiles, a fighter jet should be no problem of it gets within range. Problem is most jets can take out a target from outside a crams range.
You're talking human brain and logic versus computers... have you never outsmarted cpu enemies in a game to the point where it's almost no challenge? Much more effective against targeted strikes and such, I'm sure.
@@hardtelling3879 if you believe they shoot ammo that disappears and evaporates but would have destroyed a plane, I don’t know what to tell ya besides, have a nice day👍
@@abtreeguy 🤔🧐😬🤣 ok I needed that laugh😏. If your gonna speak on something it's best if you know just a little bit about it but you just went in not knowing shit. Before you insult someone that's speaking facts by acting like just because it doesn't sound right or wtfever you might wanna goggle it. I've known about that for years oh and they detonate after it's effective range oh and by the way the navy ones don't because they're usually on the ocean...... Just saying
@@abtreeguy listen idk why you don't want to even educate yourself on something your CLEARLY wrong about,🤔 well maybe that's it you don't want to admit your wrong. It's no big deal lol everyone has done it. I mean shit I even Linked a video showing it! Oh and the reason I chose this name is because it's literally hard telling who your talking to online. I was just trying to inform you on something interesting and you being a stubborn prick isn't bothering my "nice day" lol it's entertaining to some degree talking to people like you...... Goggle it or watch the video I posted lmao my god it's not hard
It would probably be more cost effective but could easily be shut down with remote interference or by directed EMP. Once a round is air born the only way to stop it is to get in it's way.
These graphics are great, but always show the aircraft deploying decoy flares. Flares are good for decoying infrared guided missiles, but bad for radar guided ballistic projectiles.
Well that was 2.5Billion dollars well spent... If the jet takes down that c-ram, the jet and his friends can enter the restricted air space, and damage what is most important, so it's better that they use all the bullets and missiles possible whichin this case is billions of dollars. But remember, them jets are also millions of dollars too, so the cram only put out $180 per every dollar the enemy used to attack them...
It’s a video game, beast of a weapon but in reality the barrels would of melted long before a few hundred thousand rounds of ammo and they don’t carry that much ammo in one box it’s like a planx on steroids!
That is the argument for Goalkeeper over Phalanx. The systems are very similar, but instead of using the Phalanx 20mm cannon, Goalkeeper uses the 30mm GAU-8 cannon best known for its use in the A-10. There isn't an aircraft in service that can take hits from a 30mm and remain airborne the way those target drones were taking the 20mm hits.
Just how many rounds would that thing hold in real life? How much does each round cost? They shoot those self detonating rounds so they dont come down on civilians I cant imagine they are cheap.
That’s about what I was thinking. Years ago when the Naval Gatling gun was testing my uncle was working on that while in the service. He told me that was the most expensive ordnance they used. Thought that odd at the time. He told me what different missiles cost and what 30 seconds of firing the gun cost. Back then it was only $12 a shot.
Over 3000 rounds to take down one plane that ain't good you can tell the government ain't paying that bill all those rounds that missed they come down somewhere
@@robertromeo1252 They’re mostly used for shooting down subsonic projectiles like mortars, missiles, artillery, ETC. It’s capable of shooting down aircraft, however generally missiles are used for that seeing as they have longer range and are more accurate.
If I had to say any thing. Lear to bird hunt shoot on the fly. Can't hit where they was. Its be hind them. Duck hunting is great way to shoot down birds.. Play it again Sam. Can't say I saw Jet hit. If any thing was luck.
Nope. In real life it would be much more accurate, however the chances of an aircraft getting that close is pretty low. Generally they’re deployed to shoot down incoming projectiles like sub-sonic rocket, artillery and mortar threats (Hence the acronym C-RAM), and even if they were in this situation, they’re way more accurate in real life.
@@tapioca2768 yeah, I feel like in the video the CRAM was being controlled by a human player with skill issue because I remember even in Battlefield 3 it wasn't that hard to score hits on a jet on xbox 360 with a controller so with kb+m I feel it'd be way easier to track the target with the mouse. Though having played Arma this past week (first week owning any Arma title) if it AI controlled then I wouldn't be too too surprised because I've seen Arma AI do some pretty brain dead stuff.
That minimum needs to be recalibrated,it is waisting lots of lead.
America
This is adspam using computer graphics Darth Vader has no chance against Slinky Zelenky 😄😄😄😄😄
This isn't real
@@juststop022 I know it is vertual reality. Thanks Derek...
@@duaneshriver9175 sorry for offending you
At $27 a round that's almost 2.6 million dollars worth of ammo. That makes stingers and even bigger long range missiles look really really cheap..
And do you really think a human was in the seat of the target aircraft?
Now, put this scenario in the context of a Carrier Group.
What dose each ship cost? Just to build one?
Next, imagine that volume of fire from multiple points and angles.
To me, the Cost of the ammunition is MORE than woth the lives of the men aboard the ships.
Then there is the loss of a ship. Years to build JUST ONE.
HUSH, oh great ignorant one.
Yep not cost effect at all plus the platform wouldn’t stor or fire that many rounds with a catastrophic breakdown it went melt tye barrels and also discharge ammo gos or the heat involved, nice graphics though I’m no gamer just like my guns ( safety 1st guys). Bloodybfpell checker ain't worth BMA damn pemmuhy
You forgot to mention the gun’s barrels needing to be replaced after melting.
You actually thought this was real?
this is civilian math not warfare math
Without a doubt, this is video game footage. C-RAM has been deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan against enemies with zero aircraft. It deals with missiles and artillery and mortar rounds.
No shit this is arma 3.
Oh, what the fuck gave it away? I guess it wasn't the game's name in the fucking title.
That's more believable. I was wondering why the pilots were not flying away.
Right. The 96 million rounds? WTF?
Awesome video!
Pray and spray taken to a new level.
Very cool render, almost had me fooled, you have a good eye I just say
Imagine if you lived right across the water.
Those should be a trio so the other two can get out front and save some rounds. It would also be good to one or two below the ridge across the chanel programed to eliminate the possibility of friendly fire.
Beautiful graphics
I'm no expert on this and I am not qualified but, to me that seems to be an over abundance of ammo being used and the ratio of hit verses miss. I hope that system can be honed in better than this!
This is from a video game
So, are you going to attempt to attack the ship and group of ships with that capability?
Would you dare to say that the ammunition to protect an American War Ship costs too much?
Please stop.
@@donaldmurphy3148 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
@@donaldmurphy3148 so you're saying you're gay? Why?
96 million bullets cost less than a fighter pilot
Second one took one hell of a beating. Must be a Frogfoot. Has titanium to protect critical airframe as well as cockpit.
And it is all kept in a 1,000 round ammo box!
With the price of ammo sounds like you traded an F35 for those two planes.
96,000,000 rounds later and sill flying!!! BOOM 💥
3:21 Aw, he tore him up.
It's like high-stakes silly string.
Can you imagine a couple of these guns being used in the Pacific Theater in WW II
I love thinking about those things. Other then high altitude bombers your pretty much invincible to planes of that era
the last plane was tough. it took lots of hits with seemingly no damage. oh, and you were wrong. i counted 96,000,004 rounds fired
You are correct! I counted the same as well.
Yep, 96 million and 4 exactly !
Who taught this compared comparison guy how to count 🤔
Go get'em
Ammunition is much cheaper than a multi-rule fighter jet.
It's not really meant for shooting down Jets which could easily fly above it's range and bomb it to bits. I don't think the real deal could fire that many rounds without reloading. It's not just the 2.6 million dollars with the rounds that $96,000 shots would be it's the crew of eight it takes to run the generator maintain the gun and radars and keep the hydraulics working. It's good for defending a base from a surprise attack but it's not what you would use on a routine basis. You could get the crew down to three and still give those three soldiers seven stingers each and they could probably shoot down a jet and a helicopter with stingers to spare. Especially if the jet wants to drop down below 10,000 ft to get within the effective range of the c ran. The best use of money is not to put soldiers in harm's Way in the first place.
Have you seen the price of ammo lately?
@@SJM6791 It costs 20-30 USD for one CIWS/C-RAM round
Seems like a good idea to locate the c-ram with radar and take it out with missiles.
Pretty sure the cram has better tracking capabilities using radar. They shoot down incoming missiles, a fighter jet should be no problem of it gets within range. Problem is most jets can take out a target from outside a crams range.
You're talking human brain and logic versus computers... have you never outsmarted cpu enemies in a game to the point where it's almost no challenge?
Much more effective against targeted strikes and such, I'm sure.
That's a good pilot.
Nice video game.
Imagine being “over there” where all that lead is landing 😬
The real ones they use on land have self ammo that self destruct after a certain distance.
@@hardtelling3879 if you believe they shoot ammo that disappears and evaporates but would have destroyed a plane, I don’t know what to tell ya besides, have a nice day👍
@@abtreeguy 🤔🧐😬🤣 ok I needed that laugh😏. If your gonna speak on something it's best if you know just a little bit about it but you just went in not knowing shit. Before you insult someone that's speaking facts by acting like just because it doesn't sound right or wtfever you might wanna goggle it. I've known about that for years oh and they detonate after it's effective range oh and by the way the navy ones don't because they're usually on the ocean...... Just saying
@@hardtelling3879 just because you are “hard telling “ a sentence doesn’t make it true. Have a nice day
@@abtreeguy listen idk why you don't want to even educate yourself on something your CLEARLY wrong about,🤔 well maybe that's it you don't want to admit your wrong. It's no big deal lol everyone has done it. I mean shit I even Linked a video showing it! Oh and the reason I chose this name is because it's literally hard telling who your talking to online. I was just trying to inform you on something interesting and you being a stubborn prick isn't bothering my "nice day" lol it's entertaining to some degree talking to people like you...... Goggle it or watch the video I posted lmao my god it's not hard
Those planes got plasma force field
Sure, just fire 986 trillion rounds at it, you might actually score a few hits. Highly efficient and cost effective.
Hog is my favorite. Slow ta get on site but once they are with ya they are beautiful!
Красавчик!!
I wonder if a drone swarm sheild wall would be more effective?
It would probably be more cost effective but could easily be shut down with remote interference or by directed EMP. Once a round is air born the only way to stop it is to get in it's way.
96 million rounds? A couple of shoulder fired missiles would have cost significantly less
Yeah that's why it's just a game lol I would if your playing just 1 million rounds be more fun than 50 stingers...
Oh! My god
Now I know why the price of bullets on many gun has gone through the roof. Probably supply chain issues.
Nice work!!!!
Is this a game or is it real life footage. If its a game I'm interested in acquiring it. Thanks 😊
The game is arma 3
@@Don_Lemino thank you
Says clearly in the title it's a game
So, probably half a billion dollars to shoot down two low flying planes. Sounds about right.
Eventually you got to move from the Defensive to The Offensive!!
I wonder... if the barrels are hotter than the center of the earth, would the munitions start detonating a bit early? Lol
Yeah. I was wondering how long a bbl lasts.
I don't think it's a waste of ammo if there was five or six more Fighters he be needing all the LED he can get
Need the S2
is the best ..🌝🌚🌛🌜🌞🌞🙇🙇🙇
984,087,445,991,9948 bullets at a cost of $3,678,999,675 dollars to shoot down one plane.
These graphics are great, but always show the aircraft deploying decoy flares. Flares are good for decoying infrared guided missiles, but bad for radar guided ballistic projectiles.
That's a money maker for the arms manufacturer, they could make it much more accurate but that would mean less profits.😈
I bet that barrel is more than just air cooled
Odd people not noticing this is from a video game... However "news" companies used the same game as Ukrainian "military footage"
I know the video is not real.I was only stating what aI thought if it was. I wasn't born yesterday...DS
That’s enough lead to sink a zeppelin!
Well that was 2.5Billion dollars well spent...
If the jet takes down that c-ram, the jet and his friends can enter the restricted air space, and damage what is most important, so it's better that they use all the bullets and missiles possible whichin this case is billions of dollars. But remember, them jets are also millions of dollars too, so the cram only put out $180 per every dollar the enemy used to attack them...
96 million at 10 dollars a round. Almost a billion to shoot down 2 aircraft? Something isn't adding up.
Good job they don't sell them in WallMart
More video game footage
It’s a video game, beast of a weapon but in reality the barrels would of melted long before a few hundred thousand rounds of ammo and they don’t carry that much ammo in one box it’s like a planx on steroids!
Yeah, the title said the games name.
US be like: Business is Booming
96000000 bullets?! US army has been bankrot now
That is the argument for Goalkeeper over Phalanx. The systems are very similar, but instead of using the Phalanx 20mm cannon, Goalkeeper uses the 30mm GAU-8 cannon best known for its use in the A-10. There isn't an aircraft in service that can take hits from a 30mm and remain airborne the way those target drones were taking the 20mm hits.
Dang I didn’t know it used the GAU-8
🐗🛩😳
This was amazing. Before I read the description I thought this was real. That’s one scary piece of equipment.
🌴☀️🌴
You can easily tell this is a video game.
LoL 😂. Cheers.
It’s nice that we have this at our disposal. I just wish it wasn’t so horribly inaccurate and wasteful. I’m sure someone can radically improve it.
If youre the company selling the bullets for this thing then it is perfect and should not be adjusted
In real life its way more accurate. This is a computer game and the one shooting the gun is the guy who created the video.
Just how many rounds would that thing hold in real life? How much does each round cost? They shoot those self detonating rounds so they dont come down on civilians I cant imagine they are cheap.
hello bro very real
In real life it would probably take it down in one pass.
Why the fighter jets are roaming around in the C-RAM vicinity and with in it’s range rather than getting away from it when C-RAM is targeting them?
You actually think this is real?
@@ironnads7975 lmfao
La mira della Torretta sempre a cazzo di cane. 🤣🤣
Let’s multiply how much a round and see how much that cost.
30X96,000,000=2,880,000,000
Theoretically, it would cost 2880000000 USD to purchase that ammunition
That’s about what I was thinking. Years ago when the Naval Gatling gun was testing my uncle was working on that while in the service. He told me that was the most expensive ordnance they used. Thought that odd at the time. He told me what different missiles cost and what 30 seconds of firing the gun cost. Back then it was only $12 a shot.
salve chefe 👍
Is that loaded with non-explosive rounds?
96 million rounds will probably cost more than 2 fighter aircraft.
A couple of Stingers would've sufficed. Seems like a waste of ammo. Put this thing on a tank and you've got something 😁
First, they’re much more accurate in real life
Second, we actually have a modified M113 equipped with an AA gun, kinda like putting a CIWS on a tank
So they spent more on ammo than those jets cost?
96 MILLION ????
Over 3000 rounds to take down one plane that ain't good you can tell the government ain't paying that bill all those rounds that missed they come down somewhere
You know it’s a video game right..?
@@tapioca2768 yeah I know what I was looking at was a video game but they really do have those weapons that waste plenty of ammunition for one plane
@@robertromeo1252 They’re more accurate in real life though, plus they aren’t designed for shooting down aircraft
@@tapioca2768 really what are they actually designed for
@@robertromeo1252 They’re mostly used for shooting down subsonic projectiles like mortars, missiles, artillery, ETC. It’s capable of shooting down aircraft, however generally missiles are used for that seeing as they have longer range and are more accurate.
Wasted bullets = 100 fighters 😂😂
So, even if those bullets are only $1 per round, then that just cost $96M to bring down that plane.
How many mouths could that $$ have fed.??
Must love spending money on ammo...
before I would take it off with a boomerang, this radar is not set.
die borholmen kennen dass - bUT WE LOVE Denmark because we love LEGO1
👍🏅🤚🏁
If I had to say any thing.
Lear to bird hunt shoot on the fly.
Can't hit where they was.
Its be hind them.
Duck hunting is great way to shoot down birds..
Play it again Sam.
Can't say I saw Jet hit. If any thing was luck.
Baby formula shortage but apparently no shortage of ammo. War sucks.
So whats the cost of a single 20mm round? How many billions of dollars would that cost to bring down each plane lol
Lose the tracers, the pilots can see them coming and fly out of there way.
One, this is a video game. Two, they use tracers on the real thing. Three, the gun is computer controlled.
@@budmeister The sea-wiz ( phalonx) land based guns though is Rader tracking they do use tracers, again which pilots can see and maneuver from .
I thought my aim was bad
How many bullets does it hold? 96000 that cannot be correct
I can not tell are we with Sam or the jets
Pero eso es munición real contra pilotos?
Yes bro
No, es de un programa, no haga caso. Una simulación
Is this DCS World?
This is a video game.
2 nd fighter jet made by tungsten
I need that gun
All those bullets that missed.. how many ppl did it hit?
This is animation from a video game, so none...
In real life, the rounds self destruct in mid air so they don’t hit anybody
@@tapioca2768 thanks...🙄
Предлогают! Здатся!
Clearly didn't use enough ammo......
Only I'm a video game would you find such waste of resources. 96M bullets fired.
400 dollars every 12 seconds
I don’t think that’s even close to cost effective
How much does all that cost
Where is all the miss ammo going
Gw samaan ma parman gaya nya si kris
Whats the point in wasting 96 million rounds when u can do it with one or two SAMs
i swear it has max load of 9000
what was the cost of all that ammunition?
If it were real life,2880000000USD
Is this close to real situation?
Nope. In real life it would be much more accurate, however the chances of an aircraft getting that close is pretty low. Generally they’re deployed to shoot down incoming projectiles like sub-sonic rocket, artillery and mortar threats (Hence the acronym C-RAM), and even if they were in this situation, they’re way more accurate in real life.
@@tapioca2768 yeah, I feel like in the video the CRAM was being controlled by a human player with skill issue because I remember even in Battlefield 3 it wasn't that hard to score hits on a jet on xbox 360 with a controller so with kb+m I feel it'd be way easier to track the target with the mouse. Though having played Arma this past week (first week owning any Arma title) if it AI controlled then I wouldn't be too too surprised because I've seen Arma AI do some pretty brain dead stuff.
လေကြောင်းကို သာသာယာယာနဲ့ဖြတ်သွားတယ်ဗျာ လေထဲမွေးလာတဲ့ကလေးလေးလိုဘဲ
96,000,000 rounds? Do you see the realism here? 🤔🙄