Boyle's, Charles's and the Pressure Law - A-level Physics Required Practicals

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 มี.ค. 2019
  • scienceshorts.net Watch me do it for reals: • Boyle's Law - Physics ...
    Now with stupid mistake note! -
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I don't charge anyone to watch my videos, so please donate if you can to keep me going! bit.ly/scienceshortsdonate

ความคิดเห็น • 42

  • @ScienceShorts
    @ScienceShorts  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Watch me do it for reals: th-cam.com/video/pLtF9sJcT9w/w-d-xo.html
    Now with stupid mistake note!

  • @yasir.3486
    @yasir.3486 5 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Dunno why you are so underrated. You’re like one of the best educational youtube channels out there IMO.

  • @hannkwak8992
    @hannkwak8992 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Charles Boyle, also known as Jake Peralta's best friend (thank you for the video btw)

  • @colarey
    @colarey 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    2:22- Boyle's law whole notes

  • @adsverse7526
    @adsverse7526 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Day before my paper 3 exam and you are honestly my saviour! I love the detail you go into, considering every aspect from uncertainty to clear diagrams and of course the written method. The list of carried out practicals to accompany on Malmesbury Education is the icing on the cake!

    • @joevenables3393
      @joevenables3393 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank god for advanced information

  • @colarey
    @colarey 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Charles law whole notes- 5:56

  • @colarey
    @colarey 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    8:40- Pressure law whole notes

  • @ascend9545
    @ascend9545 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I have watched so many of your videos to help my revision for a level physics, this is the last one i am watching before i go into my final exam! thanks so much for all the help! you`re doing a great thing here!

    • @coolman113a9
      @coolman113a9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you pass?

  • @umangakithmini5009
    @umangakithmini5009 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow great explanation....thanks for explaining the analysis part as well because most of the people out there just state how we should do the experiment without any analysis whatsoever👌🙂

  • @LeCocoRain
    @LeCocoRain 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mr Rees would you mind adding this back into the required practical playlist just for ease of viewing?

  • @joshvir262
    @joshvir262 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video!

  • @schmuckthenonce8816
    @schmuckthenonce8816 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    To everyone here sitting the exam, you can use PV/T=constant quite often to work out the new temperature or whatever. Try it out if you haven’t :))) Good luck

    • @AbdullahiIdri2001
      @AbdullahiIdri2001 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      very insightful
      thanks, shmuckthenonce lmao

  • @Josh-qg8jv
    @Josh-qg8jv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes lad well in, great video

  • @PreetKaur-sf5vq
    @PreetKaur-sf5vq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this for every specification of A Level Physics or just AQA?

  • @David-fc3mg
    @David-fc3mg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks this is great recap for my exam tomorrow

  • @rafathchowdury1968
    @rafathchowdury1968 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you do exam question tutorials please

  • @parallel4
    @parallel4 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi sir, I have a question about some things in this video.
    For the 1/V against p graph, wouldn't the gradient be 1/(pV), because the vertical axis is 1/V and the horizontal is p, so (1/V) * (1/p) = 1/(pV)?
    Also, why would we expect that graph to go through the origin? Surely 1/V can never = 0 because then you would get 1 = 0?
    Thanks so much for the videos you make, they are a great resource :)

    • @joshhampton7235
      @joshhampton7235 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Oh it’s because as you see disclaimed they’re in the wrong axis, P is Y and 1/V is x. Therefore change in P / Change in 1/V is just PV/1

    • @thomas4073
      @thomas4073 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think you're right that 1/V can never truly = 0, since when that is the case V will also be 0 (since the gas' temperature will be at absolute zero) - resulting in an indeterminant value (1/0). However, since this is indeterminant I believe (from my limited understanding) you could use l'hopital's rule to approximate it using the derivative of 1/V, which is 0/1 or 0 - showing that as V tends to 0, 1/V does indeed also tend to 0. Also, just so u know, when you've got some indeterminant fraction like that - you can't simply just multiply through by the denominator, as you end up with nonsensical results like you have shown (1=0)

    • @olimaltby5242
      @olimaltby5242 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thomas4073 you cant use l’hôpitals as the numberator and denominator don’t both tend to 0 or infinity, however it’s fair to say the volume/pressure tends to 0 at absolute 0, the same way we cannot reach absolute 0, just get very close

  • @talalabughazaleh4922
    @talalabughazaleh4922 หลายเดือนก่อน

    so underrated

  • @ayomide3238
    @ayomide3238 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    for Boyles Law How does the force from masses cause a decrease in when your are increases amount of masses?

    • @maxherbert8382
      @maxherbert8382 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      because as pressure increases the value of 101kpa - applied pressure gets smaller as mass increases

  • @masonfuller7848
    @masonfuller7848 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    on the first one, why is the change in pressure equal to the pressure its currently under take away the pressure added from the weight? i thought the pressure from the weight would be the change in pressure?

    • @drb6740
      @drb6740 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      the pressure from the air is pushing the syringe up (101Kpa) and the pressure from weight is pulling the syringe down (e.g. 9kpa), so the resultant pressure of the gas is (101-9)=92kpa

    • @masonfuller7848
      @masonfuller7848 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@drb6740 oh so it’s actually the overall pressure after you have taken the value of the weight away? Not the overall decrease

  • @diajk.1769
    @diajk.1769 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are these required for ocr phys

  • @liamfinley723
    @liamfinley723 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you think they will ask about the practical for pressure law on paper 3?

    • @arthurguest7432
      @arthurguest7432 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      i doubt it cos on pmt the required practical only talks about boyles and charles

  • @NoahAllouane
    @NoahAllouane 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are a god among men special place in heaven for you☺️ just cheated wackers ta

  • @samuel3176
    @samuel3176 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For boules law he didn’t explain the 100g-1000g. I don’t get it’s value

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Add 100g to 1000g of mass on the bottom to change force.

    • @samuel3176
      @samuel3176 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ScienceShorts oh thank you so much

  • @fbdjwjflac
    @fbdjwjflac 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Risk assessment bro

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Hot stuff makes skin ouchy

  • @karenspencer8089
    @karenspencer8089 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Actually you can write Charles' and Charles's www.lexico.com/en/definition/charles'_law . Otherwise, great video, good revision tool for my eldest daughter Jessica. Karen x.

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The written word always follows the spoken word. We don't say "Charles law", we say "Charleses law". We say "peoples" - there is no extra 's' for plural possessives. I guess I would argue that just because something is accepted doesn't mean it follows literary rules or norms (if there are such things ultimately...).
      Glad you found the video helpful!