Thanks for posting this. My 5-year-old cried on the way home when she realized she had missed the launch. I tried to tell her here in Tampa there's little chance we would have seen it, but to no avail. She loves her space launches!
1) Have you ever looked at the trajectory rockets follow? They start upright then progressively lean towards the horizontal, because once in orbit you fly parallel to the ground. So, as the rocket goes up you see mostly the ground, then more and more of the sky. Nothing hard to understand here. Also, why do you just assume that the camera must have an arc of vision so narrow that, once far up, you could only see the sky? You are forging your own little demonstration. 2) Do you have any idea of how hard a rocket accelerates? The astronauts have to face up to 4g of acceleration, in fact they break the sound barrier almost right after launch, and in order to get into orbit you need to reach Mach 20! That is almost 8km PER SECOND. Of course they are already FAR from the launch pad after 2 minutes! No one should have to point this stuff out because ANYONE can do a quick search and find these things. Also, nice xenophobia there.
Great video. I was there that day on Playalinda beach a couple of miles from the launch pad. It was my first rocket launch. An amazing sight and the sound was like nothing I'd heard before.
this was one of Theo st beautiful launch videos I've ever seen. clear, excellent camera position, excellent ground camera resolution. everything. and the spacecraft itself seemed just unbelievably smooth.
The Atlas V 401 uses a dual chamber RD 180 engine manufactured in Russia by NPO Energomash. It burns RP-1 (Kerosene) and liquid oxygen. Its fuel mixture is approximately 37 percent RP-1 to 63 percent oxygen. The rocket is nearly 60 meters tall and weighs 335 tonnes. It can lift approximately 10 tonnes to Low Earth Orbit and deliver almost 5 tonnes to Geostationary Transfer Orbit (42,000 kilometers). Its second stage uses a liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen powered RL-10 engine built by Aerojet Rocketdyne in the US. The RL-10 is one of the oldest rocket engines still in use. It was developed in 1959 by Pratt & Whitney and updated periodically to improve performance and maneuvering. In 2011 a stolen RL-10 valued at roughly 200,000 dollars was recovered by NASA. The RL-10 is one of the longest running and most reliable rocket engines in existence. It is currently used as a second stage booster on Centaur, Atlas, and Delta rockets.
marshalcraft In short, an unnamed employee removed it from storage possibly as part a larger theft involving copper wiring and other metal for illegal scrap recycling.
+Galen Matson Very good information. the RL-10 commonality with the upper stage engine of all three rockets is a real nail biter for the U.S. Gov. A failure could shut down all three programs. An RL-10 is on display at the Air Force Museum in Dayton OH
It dumbfounds me that SpaceX developed, tested & perfected their Falcon 9 engines & the Merlin payload engine in short order. It's an extremely reliable, efficient, powerful & cost effective design. Yet, NASA, USAF, ULA etc have to rely on RD-180 engines from Russia because all attempts at making a comparable US engine have failed. Originally we were buying them to keep the collapsed Soviet military / rocket industry from selling missile / ICBM tech. The RD-180 is an amazing piece of hardware that's not in dispute, but we can't claim to be super Uber military techno nation while needing other countries stuff. If the US developed an RD-180 copy, we'd have to make it stealth to claim it was better. 😲
This is a highly successful rocket design. The two major criticisms are that (1) it costs far more than an equivalent from SpaceX, a Long March, or a Soyuz. The cost difference is truly huge. Before SpaceX got the right to bid ULA was charging over $200 million per mission. When they got the right to bid, ULA cut its prices 35% but still couldn't match SpaceX or come close. (2) it relies in Russian engines and deploys defense satellites, possibly putting is in a position of relying an an adversarial nation for defense. Very possibly we are using Russian engines to launch a satellite to spy on Russia. It's darkly ironic.
***** I think we inspect the engines pretty well, I doubt they could do that. We tried to spy in China by putting things on a Boeing airplane that was used as their "Air Force One", but an entire airplane creates a lot more opportunities than just an engine.
+Karl Davis While I am fully in agreement with your points, it is worth noting that the Atlas V has NEVER failed once in its history of at least 60 missions, compared to SpaceX's less-than-perfect record. For missions with irreplaceable, top secret, or extremely high value payloads, or anything carrying an RTG, reliability can be more important than cost.
I love SpaceX, but I'm concerned about their reliability. I think it comes with innovation. When Boeing tried the Sea Launch project they had 3 failures and 1 partial failure out of 33 missions. I don't think it's so much which firm does the work, or even the cost, so much as whether they do the same thing every time. I can't wait to see what the cause of the 9/1 failure was. At this point, all possibilities are still on the table. Has there ever been a case of sabotage found? I suppose I could Google that.
Yes, open loop means the guidance system is following a pre-programmed flight path. In closed loop guidance, the flight computers are actively correcting any influences on the flight path (winds, booster performance etc.). In other words, the guidance system knows where it is, where it has to be and calculates what is needed to get there.
The Atlas uses a RL10-A4 engine in it's Centaur upper stage and a russian built RD180 engine in the first stage. Orbital Science's Antares rocket also has a first stage built in the Ukraine using two soviet built NK33 engines.
+Robert Zeurunkl They're talking about a gravity roll. Basically the rocket "rolls" out of a perfect straight up and down to make achieving orbit more efficient. It can be achieved by different thrust and/or RCS. Without researching this particular craft alot of rockets also have a gimbal that allows "aiming" of the thrust.
+Robert Zeurunkl Engine gimballing. Two engines rotate slightly in different directions. What Kenny B is referring to is the pitch maneuver, not the roll.
Sadly, both are wrong. Roll is accomplished by reaction wheels, essentially mass spun in a circle and sped up/slowed down to rotate the rocket around it's vertical axis. As for the rest, take it from the International Launch Services: "After a short vertical rise away from the pad, the vehicle begins to roll from the launch pad azimuth to the appropriate flight azimuth. Above an altitude of 244 m (800 ft), the vehicle begins pitching over into the prescribed ascent profile. At about 2,438 m (8,000 ft), the vehicle enters a pitch and yaw angle-of-attack profile phase to minimize aerodynamic loads. For Atlas V 400, after reaching 24,380 m (80,000 ft) until approximately 36,576 m (120,000 ft), an alpha-bias angle-of-attack steering technique may be used to reduce steering losses while maintaining aerodynamic loading within acceptable limits. The booster phase steering profile through the end of alpha-biased steering is implemented through our launch-day wind-steering system, which enhances launch availability by reducing wind-induced flight loads. At the end of alpha-biased steering, closed-loop guidance steering is enabled."
grmasdfII Reaction wheels are used to rotate things already in orbit, i.e. satellites. Rockets use engine gimballing to accomplish pitch, roll and yaw maneuvers. Single-engine stages need RCS to roll but can still pitch and yaw with gimballing.
As usual, ULA raised the bar for onboard launch cinematography. SpaceX's last launch was groundbreaking, but this one outdid them. Go Atlas! Go Centaur! Go ULA!
Oh good lord. Just because you play KSP doesn't make you a rocket scientist. Just like playing COD doesn't make you a fucking military expert. Quite the opposite in fact.
Parts such as the first stage will fall into the Atlantic downrange of the launchpad. The fairing segments are extremely light and may not survive the stresses of re-entry, but, should they, they are still well away from land. The upper stages either burn up in the atmosphere when they re-enter or they are fired off into parking orbits around the sun.
Paulo Alves No. It’s a Russian engine. Just because rocket scientists from the Nazis worked on the engine once they had become Russian citizens. This is a Russian designed and built engine.
I hear Sting in my head singing the lyrics to "Every Breath You Take." Every breath you take Every move you make Every bond you break Every step you take I'll be watching you!
Nota- se claramente , o Atlas V se inclinando (até cair no.mar). Mais uma milhões de dólares sendo jogado fora ou queimados; enquanto . milhões de irmãozinhos , no mundo, passam por necessidades fundamentais.
Do the first-stage booster and payload fairings burn up in the atmosphere? Or do they just fall into an orbit with the rest of the space junk that's up there?
on 2:21 the rocket is nearly horizontal yet the view FROM the rocket shows the launch pad. Now ask yourself the question: who is fucking with my mind here?!
+Martin van Niekerk :Your fucking with your own mind because your failing to consider that long range cameras were used to get these shots. The angles will appear different depending on camera location and rocket altitude.
The story of the RD180 engines is very interesting. Originally developed for the USSR's ill fated N1 moon launcher, they use technology that eclipses any other rocket engine available today. And... they were designed 40 years ago. There is a great documentary on TH-cam called "the engines that came in from the cold..." These engines provide the best weight and size to performance ratio ever designed.
You are correct. My mistake. These engines are still in production and are used for Russian Zenit launch vehicles as well as the Atlas. What makes them so efficient is an oxygen pre-burner. This enables the engine to run oxygen rich thereby developing a significantly better power to weight ratio than U.S. built engines (except for the engines that power the Space Shuttle which run on hydrogen and not RP1 Kerosene like the RD180.) There was a recent court injunction against United Space Alliance from using them. Thankfully, it was overturned.
They have a camera wich can film through the clouds at 4:52 !!! the atlas v is in the orbite and theres is lot on clouds under and they keep filming , GENIUS . there is no satellites ... the atlas has burned in the atmosphere , cause there the heat is 2000° steel melt down , and the best thing is there is 13000 satellites in the orbite , we never heard about a colision between 2 of them , they put seatbells and drive safe :D
Atlas V was never built to be cost efficient in fact the purpose was quite the opposite. It was engineered to maximize the profit for the companies charged with building the rocket on a cost plus contract meaning the more the rocket costs the more profit they'll make. Do you think the rocket is going to cost more or less then?...
The Atlas V stands erect on the pad, its burgeoning payload cowling glistening in the morning sun, poised and ready to split the hot, wet summer air and plunge headlong into deep space. All other rockets pale by comparison. None possess the length and girth of the Delta IV Heavy, which enables it to penetrate deeply into space. Time and time again, it satisfies the most demanding of missions.
No, this Atlas V is a totally different rocket than the original modified Atlas D (LV-3 B) used for John Glenn's Mercury spacecraft. The Atlas V is a two stage rocket that is notably larger, of a completely different design, and using different engines (one big engine in the first stage core instead of the three smaller ones of the original Atlas ICBM). The only thing John Glenn's Atlas has in common with the Atlas V is the name.
I suggest you do some serious reading! Yes, both the US and USSR used German technology to begin with, and the US even launched the first manned sub-orbital flights using a developed version of the V-2, but the Semyorka was a purely Russian design. Probably every Russian city has a Korolev Street, but how many von Braun Streets are there in the US? Despite Apollo, despite the Shuttle, the Russian space legacy may be greater.
Chandrayaan-2 is an engineering marvel. It demonstrates ISRO's capability to fire powerful rockets, carry heavy payloads, navigate in space, perform complex procedures, and showcases expertise in signaling and communications, cartography, sensor technology, and chemistry.
3:00 *yes!* Take that flat earthers! Jesus, thats like believing it's healthy to drink Fukushima reactor coolant. *...you just haven't tasted good eatin, till you've had one of these fried catfish sandwiches from Chernobyl, bro!*
I would love to see and hear a launch, especiallay Soyuz with ISS crew. i think would be spectacular to feel the arth tremble as the rockets shoots off to space.
Not French! Europan! Besides, it doesn't matter which nationality they might have. The Titan rocket family doesn't exist anymore while the Ariane V does. Therefor the word "predecessor".
Just for grammar's sake, the Ariane would be a successor, timewise, since it exists after the Titan. Predecessors come before. I apologize for the nationality. The Ariane is of course the product of a European consortium, launched from French Guiana. My bad.
Actually funding haven't been cut... Programs have been eliminated but NASA, USAF, NRO etc. are spending ever more money on space. The Soviets just happened to build a better and more efficient rocket engine than anything American contractors could come up with and they believed that making an engine work at those pressures and temperatures was impossible. companies like Boeing and Lockheed Marting primarily thought so because they were making enough money selling inferior technology
Do you have some problem with RD180? Hope, you have already successfully copied the engine better than Chinese:D Now you must make a good copy of Soyuz.... if you try to decrypt the source code of Soyuz, there will be writen on a popup window "Job tvoju mat" :D
It's amazing how a silly game could get so many young people interested in space again. KSP along with Chris Hadfield were great "advertisers"(for lack of a better term) for space.
Thanks for posting this. My 5-year-old cried on the way home when she realized she had missed the launch. I tried to tell her here in Tampa there's little chance we would have seen it, but to no avail. She loves her space launches!
The on-board cameras made this much more fun to watch.
It always amazes me how rockets just go strait up without falling over. The giros precision and the nozzles thrust corrections are mind boggling.
Straight up? Never left earth. It's fake. The earth is flat.
Yes. The rocket rising straight up is amazing. Given the enormous thrust its obvious of course.
thanks to computers.
Amazing on-board footage.
You would know that, how?
1) Have you ever looked at the trajectory rockets follow? They start upright then progressively lean towards the horizontal, because once in orbit you fly parallel to the ground. So, as the rocket goes up you see mostly the ground, then more and more of the sky. Nothing hard to understand here. Also, why do you just assume that the camera must have an arc of vision so narrow that, once far up, you could only see the sky? You are forging your own little demonstration.
2) Do you have any idea of how hard a rocket accelerates? The astronauts have to face up to 4g of acceleration, in fact they break the sound barrier almost right after launch, and in order to get into orbit you need to reach Mach 20! That is almost 8km PER SECOND. Of course they are already FAR from the launch pad after 2 minutes!
No one should have to point this stuff out because ANYONE can do a quick search and find these things. Also, nice xenophobia there.
@Allison Hunt Cool story, sis
u
@@uncitoyenresponsable9692 We need more people like you and less of 'them' lol
I love watching and documenting these great and amazing moments of human inventions with wide-mouth
Great video. I was there that day on Playalinda beach a couple of miles from the launch pad. It was my first rocket launch. An amazing sight and the sound was like nothing I'd heard before.
this was one of Theo st beautiful launch videos I've ever seen. clear, excellent camera position, excellent ground camera resolution. everything. and the spacecraft itself seemed just unbelievably smooth.
+Allison Hunt What about it looks "obviously fake"?
+Allison Hunt Footage from the different angles may not be synced, I guess.
+Allison Hunt Much more reasonable to believe that footage from the different angles might not be synced.
Congrats to ULA on a successful launch! Beautiful footage.
The Atlas V 401 uses a dual chamber RD 180 engine manufactured in Russia by NPO Energomash. It burns RP-1 (Kerosene) and liquid oxygen. Its fuel mixture is approximately 37 percent RP-1 to 63 percent oxygen. The rocket is nearly 60 meters tall and weighs 335 tonnes. It can lift approximately 10 tonnes to Low Earth Orbit and deliver almost 5 tonnes to Geostationary Transfer Orbit (42,000 kilometers).
Its second stage uses a liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen powered RL-10 engine built by Aerojet Rocketdyne in the US. The RL-10 is one of the oldest rocket engines still in use. It was developed in 1959 by Pratt & Whitney and updated periodically to improve performance and maneuvering. In 2011 a stolen RL-10 valued at roughly 200,000 dollars was recovered by NASA. The RL-10 is one of the longest running and most reliable rocket engines in existence. It is currently used as a second stage booster on Centaur, Atlas, and Delta rockets.
+Galen Matson why was it stolen? probably russia or china to get help reverse engineer it?
marshalcraft In short, an unnamed employee removed it from storage possibly as part a larger theft involving copper wiring and other metal for illegal scrap recycling.
illegal inconel recycling more like it.
+Galen Matson Very good information. the RL-10 commonality with the upper stage engine of all three rockets is a real nail biter for the U.S. Gov. A failure could shut down all three programs.
An RL-10 is on display at the Air Force Museum in Dayton OH
It dumbfounds me that SpaceX developed, tested & perfected their Falcon 9 engines & the Merlin payload engine in short order. It's an extremely reliable, efficient, powerful & cost effective design. Yet, NASA, USAF, ULA etc have to rely on RD-180 engines from Russia because all attempts at making a comparable US engine have failed. Originally we were buying them to keep the collapsed Soviet military / rocket industry from selling missile / ICBM tech. The RD-180 is an amazing piece of hardware that's not in dispute, but we can't claim to be super Uber military techno nation while needing other countries stuff. If the US developed an RD-180 copy, we'd have to make it stealth to claim it was better. 😲
That RD-180 engine is Soviet era rocket technology and it's a RD-170 cut in half... impressive work they did back then..
My science class built an Atlas rocket and launched it today. We then presented it to Brian Cooper, the Curiosity Rover driver. It was awesome!
So what was the "stick" sticking out of the rocket? You could see it in the close up accent views.
watching the pitch change and roll change was awsome. Getting to see those mighty engines actually steer her... got me hard.
Very nice and clean launch.
This is a highly successful rocket design. The two major criticisms are that (1) it costs far more than an equivalent from SpaceX, a Long March, or a Soyuz. The cost difference is truly huge. Before SpaceX got the right to bid ULA was charging over $200 million per mission. When they got the right to bid, ULA cut its prices 35% but still couldn't match SpaceX or come close. (2) it relies in Russian engines and deploys defense satellites, possibly putting is in a position of relying an an adversarial nation for defense. Very possibly we are using Russian engines to launch a satellite to spy on Russia. It's darkly ironic.
I wonder if the Russian can embed some senors to the engines to spy on the payload.
***** I think we inspect the engines pretty well, I doubt they could do that. We tried to spy in China by putting things on a Boeing airplane that was used as their "Air Force One", but an entire airplane creates a lot more opportunities than just an engine.
+Karl Davis While I am fully in agreement with your points, it is worth noting that the Atlas V has NEVER failed once in its history of at least 60 missions, compared to SpaceX's less-than-perfect record. For missions with irreplaceable, top secret, or extremely high value payloads, or anything carrying an RTG, reliability can be more important than cost.
I love SpaceX, but I'm concerned about their reliability. I think it comes with innovation. When Boeing tried the Sea Launch project they had 3 failures and 1 partial failure out of 33 missions. I don't think it's so much which firm does the work, or even the cost, so much as whether they do the same thing every time. I can't wait to see what the cause of the 9/1 failure was. At this point, all possibilities are still on the table. Has there ever been a case of sabotage found? I suppose I could Google that.
What do u think of Indian Rocket
whats is that weird white stick protruding out near the fairing/ on the second stage?
That's a big plastic straw.
When Marty mentioned closed-loop control at two minutes in, what was he talking about? Is it closed-loop attitude control?
Yes, open loop means the guidance system is following a pre-programmed flight path. In closed loop guidance, the flight computers are actively correcting any influences on the flight path (winds, booster performance etc.). In other words, the guidance system knows where it is, where it has to be and calculates what is needed to get there.
Despite being very expensive the atlas v is a very nice peice of kit.
ever noticed that all rocket launches are from coast? well they do it from there so the debris or rocket parts that separates falls into the ocean
Good observation.
thank you for posting this.
The Atlas uses a RL10-A4 engine in it's Centaur upper stage and a russian built RD180 engine in the first stage. Orbital Science's Antares rocket also has a first stage built in the Ukraine using two soviet built NK33 engines.
Why cut off ground video?
When they say the vehicle has accomplished a "roll", how does it do that? There are no wings or ailerons, so what makes the vehicle roll?
+Robert Zeurunkl They're talking about a gravity roll. Basically the rocket "rolls" out of a perfect straight up and down to make achieving orbit more efficient. It can be achieved by different thrust and/or RCS. Without researching this particular craft alot of rockets also have a gimbal that allows "aiming" of the thrust.
+Robert Zeurunkl Engine gimballing. Two engines rotate slightly in different directions. What Kenny B is referring to is the pitch maneuver, not the roll.
Thanks, guys. I get it now.
Sadly, both are wrong. Roll is accomplished by reaction wheels, essentially mass spun in a circle and sped up/slowed down to rotate the rocket around it's vertical axis.
As for the rest, take it from the International Launch Services:
"After a short vertical rise away from the pad, the vehicle
begins to roll from the launch pad azimuth to the appropriate flight azimuth. Above an altitude of 244 m
(800 ft), the vehicle begins pitching over into the prescribed ascent profile. At about 2,438 m (8,000 ft),
the vehicle enters a pitch and yaw angle-of-attack profile phase to minimize aerodynamic loads.
For Atlas V 400, after reaching 24,380 m (80,000 ft) until approximately 36,576 m (120,000 ft), an
alpha-bias angle-of-attack steering technique may be used to reduce steering losses while maintaining
aerodynamic loading within acceptable limits. The booster phase steering profile through the end of alpha-biased
steering is implemented through our launch-day wind-steering system, which enhances
launch availability by reducing wind-induced flight loads.
At the end of alpha-biased steering, closed-loop guidance steering is enabled."
grmasdfII
Reaction wheels are used to rotate things already in orbit, i.e. satellites. Rockets use engine gimballing to accomplish pitch, roll and yaw maneuvers. Single-engine stages need RCS to roll but can still pitch and yaw with gimballing.
As usual, ULA raised the bar for onboard launch cinematography. SpaceX's last launch was groundbreaking, but this one outdid them. Go Atlas! Go Centaur! Go ULA!
Wonder what that is flying by at 4:32
That s magnet manueverized raz?
Needs moar boosters (and struts)
Oh good lord. Just because you play KSP doesn't make you a rocket scientist. Just like playing COD doesn't make you a fucking military expert. Quite the opposite in fact.
Wyrmshadow hater.
Wyrmshadow you seem to have some unresolved anger issues.
I hate KSP joke :-(
Why? Dont hate ksp jokes because your life is shitty. Just hate your shitty life.
Excellent camera work.
Parts such as the first stage will fall into the Atlantic downrange of the launchpad. The fairing segments are extremely light and may not survive the stresses of re-entry, but, should they, they are still well away from land. The upper stages either burn up in the atmosphere when they re-enter or they are fired off into parking orbits around the sun.
Badass Russian engine
United Nations off Adi NASA an American American American America on ghgoc anniversary of Christmas and ghost and dhc
Nhey
And its completely lost after each launch. Its hard to be badass when your in small pieces.
No. Nazi technology.
Paulo Alves No. It’s a Russian engine. Just because rocket scientists from the Nazis worked on the engine once they had become Russian citizens. This is a Russian designed and built engine.
I hear Sting in my head singing the lyrics to "Every Breath You Take."
Every breath you take
Every move you make
Every bond you break
Every step you take
I'll be watching you!
Nota- se claramente , o Atlas V se inclinando (até cair no.mar). Mais uma milhões de dólares sendo jogado fora ou queimados; enquanto . milhões de irmãozinhos , no mundo, passam por necessidades fundamentais.
Do the first-stage booster and payload fairings burn up in the atmosphere? Or do they just fall into an orbit with the rest of the space junk that's up there?
+Admiral John Anything jettisoned before orbital injection will obviously fall back and burn up
+Admiral John Or crash / be recovered.
They fall, but they're not going fast enough to burn up.
What's the small pieces flying off all the time?
Fairing jettison looks fabulous
on 2:21 the rocket is nearly horizontal yet the view FROM the rocket shows the launch pad. Now ask yourself the question: who is fucking with my mind here?!
+Martin van Niekerk :Your fucking with your own mind because your failing to consider that long range cameras were used to get these shots. The angles will appear different depending on camera location and rocket altitude.
+J Dean or not. How did he jump thousands of miles when that rocket ain't moving that fast apparently.. Cgi earth never gets old
What? No Jebediah Kerman on board? This mission is doomed.
Its unmanned
It's just a probe with mechjeb.
...which desperately needs to be updated :D
THEREFORE IT IS FAKE! AHA GOT YOU NASA! (I'm joking for some people)
I believe Val is taking his place
These parts of the rocket which falls back down to the ground will they be recycled? Or do they land on peoples houses?
Great video. With all this technology going into the atmosphere, when will you make these clips in HD?
That antenna barely started bendin and he announced mach 1 then max Q
Great footage
Spectacular footage. Excellent job!
The story of the RD180 engines is very interesting. Originally developed for the USSR's ill fated N1 moon launcher, they use technology that eclipses any other rocket engine available today. And... they were designed 40 years ago. There is a great documentary on TH-cam called "the engines that came in from the cold..." These engines provide the best weight and size to performance ratio ever designed.
The RD180 is a smaller version of the RD170 which was developed for Energiya. The N1 used NK15 engines in the first stage.
You are correct. My mistake. These engines are still in production and are used for Russian Zenit launch vehicles as well as the Atlas. What makes them so efficient is an oxygen pre-burner. This enables the engine to run oxygen rich thereby developing a significantly better power to weight ratio than U.S. built engines (except for the engines that power the Space Shuttle which run on hydrogen and not RP1 Kerosene like the RD180.) There was a recent court injunction against United Space Alliance from using them. Thankfully, it was overturned.
3p mariasmenu.com/fish/fish-biriyani6
They have a camera wich can film through the clouds at 4:52 !!! the atlas v is in the orbite and theres is lot on clouds under and they keep filming , GENIUS . there is no satellites ... the atlas has burned in the atmosphere , cause there the heat is 2000° steel melt down , and the best thing is there is 13000 satellites in the orbite , we never heard about a colision between 2 of them , they put seatbells and drive safe :D
Atlas V was never built to be cost efficient in fact the purpose was quite the opposite. It was engineered to maximize the profit for the companies charged with building the rocket on a cost plus contract meaning the more the rocket costs the more profit they'll make. Do you think the rocket is going to cost more or less then?...
Wow, your logic is... impeccable...
Recover the fairings too?
Muherespolicia
No video about landing booster?
Atlas V just yeets its boosters into the ocean.
Something flew by!!!!😱 @ 4:30
It’s just a chunk of ice from the rocket.
Best rocket footage
The Atlas can not get to orbit without the second stage, so i'd say it IS needed ;-)
blablubb12345 For geostationary orbit, of cause, needed :-).
Вот-Так
It is needed for any orbit.
blablubb12345 You are right
NASA knows what is needed
how wil they return
The Atlas V stands erect on the pad, its burgeoning payload cowling glistening in the morning sun, poised and ready to split the hot, wet summer air and plunge headlong into deep space. All other rockets pale by comparison. None possess the length and girth of the Delta IV Heavy, which enables it to penetrate deeply into space. Time and time again, it satisfies the most demanding of missions.
whats this. rocket porn?
Why the fuck does this sound sexual?
โอตั้งใจรอบนี้
What happens next separation?
Great picture of planet our hearth but garbaje our spacial?what happen
bro u havin a stroke
I wish they kept the Atlas name when they switch to the Vulcan Helicopter system.
Start the video at 2:30 and watch till 2:40 it looks like it approaches a angle in which it won't even reach space
superb what an age we live in
Nice view of the earth's curvature.
Srupo..kawe lgu tgok sajo..org xbuat dgn purung nyior gotu..
No, this Atlas V is a totally different rocket than the original modified Atlas D (LV-3 B) used for John Glenn's Mercury spacecraft. The Atlas V is a two stage rocket that is notably larger, of a completely different design, and using different engines (one big engine in the first stage core instead of the three smaller ones of the original Atlas ICBM). The only thing John Glenn's Atlas has in common with the Atlas V is the name.
They said this was an atlas 5 401, not an lv3. Did you read the title right?
@@CarbonMonoxxide My comment was in response to someone's comment that has now been apparently deleted.
@@davidknisely3003 Oh, ok that makes sense.
I remember when I ran a simulation of mission control a long time ago. I was on the navigation team. I didn't bring a calculator!!!
I suggest you do some serious reading! Yes, both the US and USSR used German technology to begin with, and the US even launched the first manned sub-orbital flights using a developed version of the V-2, but the Semyorka was a purely Russian design. Probably every Russian city has a Korolev Street, but how many von Braun Streets are there in the US? Despite Apollo, despite the Shuttle, the Russian space legacy may be greater.
epic pictures!
CarbTheVeganUp t Yugoslavian
It already seems so weird not to see the first stage land.
Nice the fuel engine process air fuel mixture igniteted internal combustion chamber. Heat, befor compress, within zylinder bore,
Was there on the beach it flew right over us!
That's an emotional moment for me :*-)
ماشاء الله
متى يصنع العرب مثل هذا
ba3ed 7awali alf sana.
Great video.
A Terra Não é Plana😯😲
The Earth Is Not Flat😯😲
John Glenn rode on an earlier version of the Atlas. This is one tried & true bird.
no camera shake at 5.13 with all that inertia- simply amazing cartoon camera stabilisers !!
do you really think if they faked this stuff they'd do it so lazily so people could tell?
Uhm, why should i have a problem with the RD180 engine or why should i try to copy it? And what the hell do you mean by the "source code of soyuz"?
Tem uma coisa que passa raspando o foguete observem pessoa no video antes dele solta o primeiro componente
Em qual minuto?
maravilhoso lançamento, parabéns.
F
Chandrayaan-2 is an engineering marvel. It demonstrates ISRO's capability to fire powerful rockets, carry heavy payloads, navigate in space, perform complex procedures, and showcases expertise in signaling and communications, cartography, sensor technology, and chemistry.
3:00 *yes!*
Take that flat earthers!
Jesus, thats like believing it's healthy to drink Fukushima reactor coolant.
*...you just haven't tasted good eatin, till you've had one of these fried catfish sandwiches from Chernobyl, bro!*
and into the sea like all of them!!!! hahahahaha
What a nice name that Rocket has..
I would love to see and hear a launch, especiallay Soyuz with ISS crew. i think would be spectacular to feel the arth tremble as the rockets shoots off to space.
How are you
Why iss can't film take off from space?
They can and they have.
My favourite launch vehicles are the Titan III and Titan IV series.
However the Ariane V is a good predecessor.
Best predecessor.
Not predecessor, competitor. Ariane is French.
Not French! Europan!
Besides, it doesn't matter which nationality they might have.
The Titan rocket family doesn't exist anymore while the Ariane V does.
Therefor the word "predecessor".
European.
Just for grammar's sake, the Ariane would be a successor, timewise, since it exists after the Titan. Predecessors come before. I apologize for the nationality. The Ariane is of course the product of a European consortium, launched from French Guiana. My bad.
Actually funding haven't been cut... Programs have been eliminated but NASA, USAF, NRO etc. are spending ever more money on space. The Soviets just happened to build a better and more efficient rocket engine than anything American contractors could come up with and they believed that making an engine work at those pressures and temperatures was impossible. companies like Boeing and Lockheed Marting primarily thought so because they were making enough money selling inferior technology
It'd.going down back to the ground... What a magic :D
Do you have some problem with RD180? Hope, you have already successfully copied the engine better than Chinese:D Now you must make a good copy of Soyuz....
if you try to decrypt the source code of Soyuz, there will be writen on a popup window "Job tvoju mat" :D
The Atlas V is a good LV.
Nice job god bless everyone
It's amazing how a silly game could get so many young people interested in space again. KSP along with Chris Hadfield were great "advertisers"(for lack of a better term) for space.
re-use of rocket body will cause disaster because it is very difficult to reckon the effect of vibration in every launch.
Qual é a diferença entre a nave que caiu na lua e o aumuamua e o nossos foguetes?
não tem diferença nenhuma porquê são todos em formatos de charuto.
It's nice seeing an Atlas-Centaur launch but what i'd like to see is an Atlas-Agena launch.
Don’t need it, centaur is better anyway, but, i like your style.
Went on side and all happened in 5 min. ?
As do all orbital trajectory's so whats your point ?
Is there an un-spliced, uncut just the rocket cam version in unedited form online?
1;05 this is about the only time you get any idea what the military is really doing in space.
love those rocket cams
Superb...
Good upload
VERY NICE AND SUCESS OF NASA..
Are wah ye kitna speed hai