Joseph Prince abused Jesus & God & God’s word to lie that New Covenant is all about right believing
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- For details of this article, read it on my website:
www.revgeorgeo...
Main Title: Joseph Prince abused Jesus & God & God’s word to lie that the New Covenant is all about right believing
Sub Title: Joseph Prince, in the same sermon and the same context that he accused others of lying and spreading half-truths, he himself has abused Jesus & God & God’s word to lie and spread half-truths.
This is brazen hypocrisy of the highest order.
This is an Important Article.
For details of this article, kindly read it on my website:
www.revgeorgeo...
10 eBooks comprising 4,800 pages of notes, free for download:
www.revgeorgeo...
Right believing or wrong believing. Our words, actions will reflect. If the doctrine is right, with true repentance, the fruit of the Spirit will manifest through us. Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.
Thanks for your comment. Could you kindly get in touch with me at revgeorgeong@gmail.com Thanks
JP says Jesus says it's all about right believing. This falsehood is directly contradicted by Jesus himself in the Parables of the Two Sons (Matthew 21:28-32). In The Parable of the Tenants (Matthew 21:33-46), Jesus also warns us the consequences of disobedience of His Commandments which he directed to the Pharisees (Matthew 21:42-44). Actions speak louder than words.
See also Book of 1st John which admonishes believers of Jesus to reaffirm their belief in sound doctrine, obedience (to God's Word), and love that characterizes all TRUE CHRISTIANS. These are the basics of faith lived out - salt and light etc,, we will bear the Fruit of the Spirit, and be assured of salvation (1 John 3:24). See 1 John 3:18-19.
Titus 1:16 says that our disobedience/actions will deny God. We know what happens to those people who deny God. See also James 1:22-25 ; James 2:14-18 ; Luke 6:46
We must action our faith. Not just talk or "believe". It is commanded. 1 Corinthians 10:23-11:1 as it refers to Matthew 5:16 "In the same way, let your light shine before others, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven."
The way he talks is like as if everyone is a liar except him. This is a lowly tactic of implicating others through innuendoes. What is right believing if you are not teaching sound doctrine, Jo? Your doctrine is riddled with half-truths, lies, contradictions and distortions.
Actually the false preachers are the ones who always tell us that they have right believing; however, the doctrine of Jesus, Paul, Peter, and the Apostles would tell us that there must be right doing in what we believe in. For example, if we believe in repentance, there must be the fruits of repentance; if we believe in the law of God, we must keep the law of God; if we believe in God's love for us, we must love others; if we believe in righteousness, we will do righteousness; if we believe in faith, we will do the works of faith .. and etc. We do all these not because we are self-righteous; but because we are taught to have right believing with right doing. So, I would consider all the doctrine of Jesus, Paul, and Peter as the doctrine of *RIGHT BELIEVING* because they always tell us to attach what we believe in with the right doing, right fruit, right labor, right work, right attitude, and right response. If we just tell people that we have right believing, good believing, or fantastic believing; however, we can only keep repeating it without showing anything or any fruit, people will ask, "What's so right, so good, and so fantastic about your 'right believing'? Maybe it's just another 'radical' or 'hypocritical' believing from the false preacher?"
For example, if someone tells you to keep believing or confessing "MONEY COME TO ME RIGHT NOW" and he tells you that you don't have to work for it and that this is "right believing", do you believe him? No, you don't need a rocket scientist to tell you that he is a false preacher.
Joseph Prince says, ".. The New Covenant is all about right believing .. Now we are all concerned about right behaving right living, but God is more concerned about right believing .. " th-cam.com/video/FP43C0U-mHo/w-d-xo.html I don't know how he got this interpretation from Heb 8:10-12; however, I will ask him, Have you read Heb 12? Isn't Heb 12 a continuation of the New Covenant and Heb 10? Isn't the New Covenant about right behaving and right living too, why? It's because when you do not 'behave', you would be chastened.
I won't show the whole chapter of Heb 12, but I can show clearly from the highlighted words that the New Covenant is still about right behaving and right living with *HOLINESS, DISCIPLINE, and FEAR OF GOD* :
Heb 12:1-29 KJV Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin .. (5) .., My son, despise not thou the *CHASTENING* of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: .. (9) Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be *IN SUBJECTION* unto the Father of spirits, and live? (10) For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be *PARTAKERS OF HIS HOLINESS* (11) Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable *FRUIT OF RIGHTEOUSNESS* unto them which are exercised thereby .. .. (14) Follow peace with all men, and *HOLINESS* , without which no man shall see the Lord: (15) Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled; (16) Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright. (17) For ye know how that afterward, when he would have inherited the blessing, he was rejected: for he found no place of *REPENTANCE* , though he sought it carefully with tears .. .. (22) But ye are come unto mount Sion, .. .. (23) To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect, (24) And to Jesus the mediator of the *NEW COVENANT* , and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel. (25) See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, *MUCH MORE* shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaketh from heaven: .. .. (28) Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and *GODLY FEAR* : (29) For our God is a consuming fire.
I will ask Joseph Prince, What does it mean if we can be chastened under the New Covenant? It means that we can be reproved or corrected. It means that we can do wrong, we can become bitter, we can become greedy, we can become proud, we can act wickedly, we can be unrighteous in thoughts or deeds, we can disobey, and we can sin; but most important of all, we can still repent. If we can be chastened, it means that we can be convicted of our sins and we can still repent as the prodigal sons. So, the New Covenant is still about right behaving, right living, and right doing in Him. If we believe in chastening by Him, his chastening will ensure that we do all things in Him; however, if we reject His chastening, we will end up 'doing everything by ourselves' which is 'self-effort'.
However, Joseph Prince might still argue, "But we are the righteousness of God. All our sins are forgiven, past, present, and future. How can you say that we will sin or we have sins? If we have been forgiven, we have no more unforgiven sins. So, God cannot convict us of our sins !" I will ask him, Do you know that there were two kings who sinned under the Old Testament: King Saul and King David? It means that they were the two 'prodigal sons' in the house of God: one sinned without repentance; but the other sinned and repented. Yes, King David is considered as God's favored one or God's righteous one, but when he committed adultery and killed the husband of Bathsheba, don't you think that he had sinned too?
Similarly, under the New Testament, there were two 'prodigal sons' who sinned too: Judas Iscariot and Peter; however, Peter repented and submitted to the chastening of God. There are still many 'prodigal sons' in the church (or in the house of God) today; however, how many will really repent? It depends on what kind of 'right believing' has influenced them. If they cannot submit to the chastening *(or CONVICTION)* of the Father, very likely they are not the true sons of God and they might not have truly repented at all. The Bible is very clear on this: If they cannot be chastened *(or CONVICTED)* by the Holy Spirit, they would be cut off from God's presence totally (like Ananias, Sapphira, or Simon):
Heb 12:8-9 KJV But if ye be without *CHASTISEMENT,* whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. (9) Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live?
I think we have come to the most critical question: *Are all our past, present, future sins forgiven?* It is because if we cannot answer it properly, Joseph Prince will endlessly tell us that no one can reprove him or convict him of his sins even if he lies, double-talks, or preaches heresies. So, has all his past, present, and future sins been forgiven? Before we answer him, we must know that this question is still very vague. We can easily answer that all our past and present sins have been forgiven, but the future sins might be a little 'tricky'. So, to answer it more clearly, we need to break it down into 2 more questions to answer it more specifically, i.e. :
1. Have all our sins including our future sins been forgiven *NOW?*
2. Have all our sins including our future sins been forgiven *IN THE FUTURE?*
Isn't it clear that both questions have now become an invalid question now? 1. First question on future sin which *HAS NOT HAPPEND* yet - does it make sense to forgive it before it happens? It's like, before I slap you, I ask you to forgive me first. Does it make sense? No, if I have not slapped you, I don't have to ask for your forgiveness. 2. Second question on future sin which *HAS NOT HAPPEND* yet but it will be *FORGIVEN IN THE FUTURE* - does it make sense to forgive a future sin in the future? It's like, if I slap you in the future, you have, no choice but to, forgive me in the future. What does it mean? It means that I *HAVE CONTROL* over you in the future because you have to yield to me (to forgive me with no condition attached). Of course, this won't make sense to you because you should be the one in control because I slap you or sin against you. Now, put yourselves in God's 'shoes', will it make sense to God (that He is 'obliged' to forgive you in the future, even if you sin with no repentance)? If He has to, He is not God; you are God.
Of course, this is so ridiculous; however, it would show how ridiculous is JP's future sins 'hypothesis' and his yearning for the control over God or future. Obviously, this is his kind of mentality or 'right believing' that cannot submit to the chastening (or *CONVICTION* ) of the Father. That's why he is so against the conviction of sins or confession of sins to God. I believe that this is not an overstatement. I really think that, if you talk to him about sins or his past sins, you would see how his face will change ('colors' literally). I believe that most of his leaders know that this is one 'area' that they should never 'cross or enter'; or else, .. .. they know what is the consequence.
Why is Jp making such a sweeping derisive statement against experts- "even experts can be saying half-truths" Isn't he himself an expert in his version of grace? The likely motive is that Jp is trying to discourage or distract people from turning to this channel and other world channels exposing and poking holes in his teaching. Desperate, he resorted to this diversionary tactic
scammer likes to say others are scammers.
It’s about right accurate teaching of the word to get right believing and right living. It’s not simply right believing becoming right living.
God’s word did not say right believing to get right living. Tis is JP’s doctrine.