The Parallel Axis Theorem (Steiner's Theorem) | Classical Mechanics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @Ovechkin8484
    @Ovechkin8484 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Cool to finally see this derived!

  • @kristofmohoric2861
    @kristofmohoric2861 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Explained as it should be. Well done!

  • @yahavhazut
    @yahavhazut 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wish my professor could explain as good as you did in just 2 minutes...

    • @PrettyMuchPhysics
      @PrettyMuchPhysics  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That‘s very kind of you, thanks for watching!

  • @majorfallacy5926
    @majorfallacy5926 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Would you look at that, a Pretty Much Physics video i actually understand

    • @PrettyMuchPhysics
      @PrettyMuchPhysics  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s great! We all have to start at the beginning somewhere.

  • @liederivative3312
    @liederivative3312 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    These are great! Could you make a video about Faddeev-Popov ghosts please!

    • @PrettyMuchPhysics
      @PrettyMuchPhysics  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great idea! That’s a tough topic for a 5 minute video though, but we’ll think about it!

  • @Internet-Antics
    @Internet-Antics 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That was great! Glad I stayed subscribed n

  • @irwinedbert2436
    @irwinedbert2436 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i dont quite understand why the integral of rcv dm is zero. I thought, since we are trying to calculate I_B so the axis (x,y) is in respect of B. Hence integral of rcv dm shouldnt be zero. Can you please explain it to me? Thx!

    • @RuneScapeSheets
      @RuneScapeSheets 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look into product of inertia. This is a pretty good video explaining it th-cam.com/video/8_3sDlue0nI/w-d-xo.html

  • @ledescendantdeuler6927
    @ledescendantdeuler6927 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi thanks for the proof, could you explain in more details why 2a*Integral(rcv) dm is 0 pls ?

  • @markkennedy9767
    @markkennedy9767 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi you might be able to help me out with something i cant figure out:
    If I apply the parallel axis theorem to a (non-spinning) body of mass m in uniform circular motion around a point a distance r away, then I get the angular momentum of the body about the point is
    (I + mr^2) omega where I is the body's moment of inertia around its COM and omega is the body's angular velocity around the point.
    However if we compute the angular momentum by just getting the orbital angular momentum about the point (where the body isn't spinning around its COM), we get r × mv = (mr^2 omega) which is clearly different to what we got above.
    Can you point out where I might be making a mistake here.
    Your help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.

  • @infinitedegreesoffreedom584
    @infinitedegreesoffreedom584 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Neato

  • @oneofthosemoments4564
    @oneofthosemoments4564 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I didn't understand a thing😔

    • @PrettyMuchPhysics
      @PrettyMuchPhysics  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Any concrete questions we can help you with?

    • @malikbaud
      @malikbaud ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@PrettyMuchPhysics i didn't understand why the intergral of rcvdm is 0

  • @BawonSamndi
    @BawonSamndi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can't use Steiner Theorem without adding Kurt Angle. Downvote