Maya Jade I know as a scientist with a passion for animation I want to mix my research and convey it in film mostly because I'm not good at explaining things but I love both
I was literally doing some preliminary sketches of vorticella for the start of Inktober 2018 starting tomorrow, while watching this episode. Speaking of which, Hank vorticella equates to fewer mosquito larvae so why not do an episode on them and other biologically-based, environmentally friendly methods of pest control? I think that the free swimming stage looks like a star trek planet killer doomsday machine.
I always thought science and art went together. In some ways, science is an art, and art is a science. I think it's sad how often schools separate the two and give more value to one than the other. When creative minds combine art and science, huge advancements like in this video can be made.
This Channel is improving my English so much! And I love it, because most part of the videos have subtitles in English. Go on with the great job SciShow! Hugs from Brazil!
Good stuff here; Beatrix Potter - who knew? One point of clarification should be made: it is misleading to use the term "circulatory system" in reference to the work of Galen or anybody through the 1500s, including Valerius. Valerius (non-latinized given name Andries van Wesel) did correct Galen's structural inaccuracies, but mostly followed him on blood flow. He died about 13.5 years before the birth of William Harvey on 1 April 1578. It was Harvey who demonstrated that blood circulates (left ventricle - arteries - body - veins - rt. atrium (auricle) - rt. ventricle - lungs - left atrium - left ventricle and repeat), publishing the developed version in "De Motu Cordis" in 1628, about 64 years after van Wesel's death.
the total acceptance for seriously over 1000 years of certain figures as the pinnacles of knowledge is really a scary time of reflecting on that regions history.
I was in Boston a couple years ago to visit friends and one told me about the glass botanical models at the Harvard Natural History Museum. I ended up going there, and they were honestly incredible. I couldn't believe the detail of these hundreds of models. If you are ever in Boston, do yourself a favor and go there.
I grew up in Cambridge, MA and about 12 blocks away from the museum that holds the Glass Flowers. Once a year my father would take me there and we would look at the flowers together. Since each year I was a little older and more capable of appreciating the details in the work and the natural history and anatomy. If you are ever in Boston take a couple of hours to visit the museum, you will be absolutely astounded at what you will see.
Leen Al-Dayni Hey! I ended up changing course a bit and got two BA degrees - one in Art and one in Bio. I’m working on applying to Genetics PhD programs now while keeping up the art as a hobby. I hope to use it in future research and learn more about scientific illustration later though. I hope all goes well for you :)
I've been fortunate enough to see the Blaschka's glasswork. It's absolutely captivating-- the world falls away and you find an hour of awestruck study passes in a moment.
I've felt that the quality of this channel has been going down a bit over the last couple of months, but this video was really good. Actually gave me some insight into things I wasn't aware of before, instead of just giving a list and sprouting off a few related things about the entries. Glad to see things changing for the better again. :)
The discovery of the structure of the neurons is incredible, and those drawings really emphasize their root-like structure. The bumps remind me of nodules of many plant roots containing nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Just amazing, and complex...
hearing the Aristotle thing about bugs reminded me. If there's one thing that movies, namely men in black, has taught me. "Imagine what you'll know tomorrow."
Thank you SciShow It fills my heart with joy learning a bunch of stuff thanks to you. What a beautiful world with live in. There's so much more to learn
Hi Hank, Perfect "Illustration" of why we need PBS and the National Endowment for the Arts. The students of today will be the scientists of tomorrow and we all need them to have passion about their subjects. The current administration is being terribly short sighted, without the arts we all lose in the end. Thanks.
I want to give a shout out to my two favorite scientific illustrators; Ernst Haeckel who did amazingly beautiful illustrations of marine invertebrates and other creatures, and Guy Harvey who may be known for game fish art but comes from a base of marine biology and illustration.
The Ware Collection, informally called the Glass Flowers, houses all (that's right, all) of the Blaschkas' botanical output. They do not all represent flowers (leaves, seeds and other features are also depicted) but are quite uniformly beautiful. No botanist would dream of visiting Boston (ok, Cambridge) without visiting them.
I love Hank Green Enthusiastic but not to point it get on your nerve. Good vid as always. These names truly deserve to be remembered. Who were they again? lol
1:48 Actually, it depends on the age of the person. While an adult person has just one mandibular bone, there were actually two separated halfs as individual bones at one point of their life. Originally, there are two bones. They later connect by an articulation, the symphysis mandibulae, which is actually still visible on adults. This is why some mammals like dogs are considered to have two bones and why Galeno thought it so.
Vesalius hired an artist from the school of Titian (often thought to be Jan van Calcar) to create his illustrations. The video makes it sound like he was the artist himself.
I don't like how he trashes Aristotle so much. Despite him being wrong on many things. His work on metaphysics and epistemology became the foundations of modern science and technology. with out Aristotle's work on syllogism and formal logic you would not have modern-computer science or math as we know it today.
You also wouldn't have it as it was today if people never started to question what he was right about, what he was wrong about and to what extent was he right in the first place.
No mention of Robert Hooke? He did some of the earliest scientific illustration using a microscope. His drawing of a flea is still one of my favorite pieces of illustration.
My favorite science illustrators usually work in the field of speculative biology, like Dougal Dixon (The New Dinosaurs), Wayne D. Barlowe (Expedition), and C.M. Kosemen (All Tomorrows). Highly recommended for the mind-f*cks, while still keeping it within the purview of science and realism.
Loved this list, I would really appreciate to see Margaret Mee in this list too. She was one of the first botanical artist to work in Amazon Florest and was a very important environmentalists to draw attention to the impact of large-scale mining and deforestation on the Amazon Basin.
I am slightly nit picking but, I was taught that Galen was a Roman physician taking many of his ideas from Hippocrates, including the four humours, I am only a secondary school student but I was taught this recently and my teacher is awesome. I might be wrong, anyways love your vids pls keep doing them, I learn a lot :)
Greece was part of the Roman Empire at that time. Empires consist of multiple countries. So he was from the country of Greece, which was part of the Roman Empire.
Newton did indeed show that light could be separated in a prism but he did not define the primary colours. It was James Clerk Maxwell who discovered that the additive mixtures of red blue and green light created white light.
Love it!! I work in HS bio lab and getting kids to sketch what they're looking at through a microscope is like pulling teeth. Such a loss :( I hope this encourages some young illustrators!!
I was thinking among a similar vein except that it was how I hated having to draw anything when I was in school. I liked the different science classes I took despite the drawing parts. I prefered a good illustrated text to learn about stuff, I considered drawing a chore and doing chores it something I want to forget once I'm finished.
I agree with @SlyPearTree - especially if drawing is not something you can do at all, that practice of forced sketching can be detrimental to what I am trying to learn (college biology student, this hits home). As a prospective teacher, I see both sides, there needs to be another way to preserve the knowledge and the spirit of the student who finds drawing legitimately and literally painful.
Cherise Nunez Wow I never expected pushback haha. What a shame. It's not that they are *assigned* drawing, it's that they don't even have the desire to try. And that is a shame. If you were encouraged to draw at a younger age I doubt you'd be so averse to drawing now. It isn't about artistic ability but better visualization. Naturalists should be able to represent/visualize what they're talking about, and that starts in sketching or modeling. It's hardly a sacrifice to encourage students to TRY sketching a cell--which after all, is mostly squiggles if we're honest. Students today also don't take notes during class (they aren't obligated to), but those that do (and sketch what they see) mostly do better at information retention. Just my thoughts.
Jaguar Domingo I drew as a kid and I drew all through school. Drawing cells was a) not an artistic assignment, it was just supposed to be a diagram and b) not as fun as drawing cute girls. Different artists have different specialisations.
Aristotelian Abiogenesis was firstly and primarily refuted by Francesco Redi in his paper "Esperienze Intorno alla Generazione degli Insetti" in 1668 - 7 years before Merian published her first book and nearly 40 years before "Metamorphosis insectarium Surinamensium." Abiogenesis was only truly disproven by Pasteur though in the 19th century with his swan-neck flask experiment.
interesting... because of Hank's pronunciation of 'fungi' I have learned that, in words of Greco-Latinate origin, a hard 'g' often proceeds the vowels 'a' 'o' and 'u' while the soft 'g' proceeds the vowels 'e' 'i' 'y'. Being that 'fungi' has its origin in Latin the soft g sound is correct. I thought it was a hard g.
Yes, it's bullshit. However, it's idiomatic use as "the single ultimate information source," isn't going to go away any time soon thanks to the prevalence of Christianity in English-speaking nations.
I mean, I get where Aristotle was coming from. If you've ever seen a horse poop while it's walking around on a hot day, those flies literally seem to appear out of nowhere in a second or two.
9:46 Hmm... So I gave some thought into this: obviously, the color comes from the dichromate+silver oxirreduction, but the 'mystery' is as to why neurons are dyed randomly; given that the axons are lined with _sodium/potassium_ ion channels, I guess it's the counterions' fault; just swap K2Cr2O7 with, say, Rb2Cr2O7 or Cs2Cr2O7 (but any large cation would do), and do the test against a K2Cr2O7 control *edit: a high-conc KCl solution may be a cheper alternative*
Why does everybody complain about Olivia's hands and moving about when Hank and the other hosts do exactly the same thing? Can't we just appreciate all of the hosts for making these videos, and watch them for the content?
That's exactly my point. Nobody is complaining about Hank doing exactly the same thing as what they always complain about Olivia doing. So yes, you're right. That *does* make sense.
alot of blaschka stuff is in corning ny as well along with the torches definitely worth seeing in person crazy to think they made such accurate/realistic models on alcohol based torches
intelligent discriminative, selective and schematic drawings can do more than photographies or realistic representations because they can show an analytic understanding of any subject of study. Intelligent artists are fully needed in science and pedagogy of science.
The mandible forms during fetal stages from two structures which merge at the midline. So, it really kinda does start out as two “bones” during development even though it is expressed as a single bone once a fetus is fully formed.
Vesalius is very familiar to me and I have heard of Merian and Cajal's work. I get pretty nerdy about that kind of stuff. Potter's fascination with fungi was interesting to hear.
As an artist with a passion for science, this video makes me very happy.
Maya Jade I know as a scientist with a passion for animation I want to mix my research and convey it in film mostly because I'm not good at explaining things but I love both
I was literally doing some preliminary sketches of vorticella for the start of Inktober 2018 starting tomorrow, while watching this episode. Speaking of which, Hank vorticella equates to fewer mosquito larvae so why not do an episode on them and other biologically-based, environmentally friendly methods of pest control? I think that the free swimming stage looks like a star trek planet killer doomsday machine.
As a Scientist with a passion for art this video makes me happy too!
I always thought science and art went together. In some ways, science is an art, and art is a science. I think it's sad how often schools separate the two and give more value to one than the other. When creative minds combine art and science, huge advancements like in this video can be made.
This Channel is improving my English so much! And I love it, because most part of the videos have subtitles in English. Go on with the great job SciShow!
Hugs from Brazil!
Wish I could personally thank each of these people. They were unknowingly revolutionizing humanity.
Good stuff here; Beatrix Potter - who knew?
One point of clarification should be made: it is misleading to use the term "circulatory system" in reference to the work of Galen or anybody through the 1500s, including Valerius. Valerius (non-latinized given name Andries van Wesel) did correct Galen's structural inaccuracies, but mostly followed him on blood flow. He died about 13.5 years before the birth of William Harvey on 1 April 1578.
It was Harvey who demonstrated that blood circulates (left ventricle - arteries - body - veins - rt. atrium (auricle) - rt. ventricle - lungs - left atrium - left ventricle and repeat), publishing the developed version in "De Motu Cordis" in 1628, about 64 years after van Wesel's death.
the total acceptance for seriously over 1000 years of certain figures as the pinnacles of knowledge is really a scary time of reflecting on that regions history.
I was in Boston a couple years ago to visit friends and one told me about the glass botanical models at the Harvard Natural History Museum. I ended up going there, and they were honestly incredible. I couldn't believe the detail of these hundreds of models. If you are ever in Boston, do yourself a favor and go there.
This is one of those episodes I almost didn't watch, but it turned out to fascinating.
my first MS was in biomedical visualization and i am sooooo happy you posted this.. thank you
I grew up in Cambridge, MA and about 12 blocks away from the museum that holds the Glass Flowers. Once a year my father would take me there and we would look at the flowers together. Since each year I was a little older and more capable of appreciating the details in the work and the natural history and anatomy. If you are ever in Boston take a couple of hours to visit the museum, you will be absolutely astounded at what you will see.
Suriname, my home country! No one ever does a video with us in it! I'm so proud! Thanks SciShow!!!
You made my week! 😄😄😄
Leopold and Rudolf Blaschka's work are my favourite exhibits at the Natural History Museum of London, they are amazing masterpieces of scientific art.
This is what I'm going to school for - science illustration. Thanks for the inspiration!
Hi! I'm interested as well. How'd it go for you?
Leen Al-Dayni Hey! I ended up changing course a bit and got two BA degrees - one in Art and one in Bio. I’m working on applying to Genetics PhD programs now while keeping up the art as a hobby. I hope to use it in future research and learn more about scientific illustration later though. I hope all goes well for you :)
@@Bookworm3497 Awesome! Wishing you all the best
I've been fortunate enough to see the Blaschka's glasswork. It's absolutely captivating-- the world falls away and you find an hour of awestruck study passes in a moment.
I've felt that the quality of this channel has been going down a bit over the last couple of months, but this video was really good. Actually gave me some insight into things I wasn't aware of before, instead of just giving a list and sprouting off a few related things about the entries. Glad to see things changing for the better again. :)
Hank you're the absolute best!!! This world is, and for always will be blessed by your presence on it. ☑️
What a lovely collection of nerds. This it's one of the most uplifting videos I've seen from you guys :)
Eyyy! I'm a scientific illustrator! So cool to get some recognition for our teeny tiny weird field.
This is why art is important
thank you for including maria sibylla merian! she's one of my faves
I really appreciate the respect for artists in this video.
The discovery of the structure of the neurons is incredible, and those drawings really emphasize their root-like structure. The bumps remind me of nodules of many plant roots containing nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Just amazing, and complex...
Maria Sybilla and Beatrix Potter are my favorites!
Loved how this showed the connection between science and art.
hearing the Aristotle thing about bugs reminded me. If there's one thing that movies, namely men in black, has taught me. "Imagine what you'll know tomorrow."
These episodes are fantastic! That glasswork blew my mind - new bucketlist item is to see that collection! Thanks Scishow crew! 😁
The glass flowers at the Harvard Museum of Natural History are absolutely extraordinary.
Thank you SciShow
It fills my heart with joy learning a bunch of stuff thanks to you.
What a beautiful world with live in. There's so much more to learn
welcome back Hank! I think I might've missed when you came back but good to see you again, hope the kid is doin ok :P
Moths and butterflies are like a gateway subject for science illustration.
As an illustrator, I greatly enjoyed this and found topics for future projects and studies, Thank you for the constant amazing content!
I'm so glad I was able to see that guy's glass work at that museum. It's definitely worth checking out if you're in the area.
Hi Hank, Perfect "Illustration" of why we need PBS and the National Endowment for the Arts. The students of today will be the scientists of tomorrow and we all need them to have passion about their subjects.
The current administration is being terribly short sighted, without the arts we all lose in the end. Thanks.
One of the most original and best episodes
Not only is it cool to see all these artists working with science, but I love that quite a few were female.
What a great topic idea -- wonderful job, SciShow team!
this really puts into perspective how important people who really can draw and paint have been in history
I want to give a shout out to my two favorite scientific illustrators; Ernst Haeckel who did amazingly beautiful illustrations of marine invertebrates and other creatures, and Guy Harvey who may be known for game fish art but comes from a base of marine biology and illustration.
Exactly! His work is astonishing, I was surprised they did't mention his name.
Science illustration is an interest of mine that I haven't really gotten into because I don't know what to look for. Thanks for making this video.
The Ware Collection, informally called the Glass Flowers, houses all (that's right, all) of the Blaschkas' botanical output. They do not all represent flowers (leaves, seeds and other features are also depicted) but are quite uniformly beautiful. No botanist would dream of visiting Boston (ok, Cambridge) without visiting them.
I love Hank Green Enthusiastic but not to point it get on your nerve. Good vid as always. These names truly deserve to be remembered. Who were they again? lol
Thank you hank and patreon subscribers solid video.
1:48 Actually, it depends on the age of the person. While an adult person has just one mandibular bone, there were actually two separated halfs as individual bones at one point of their life. Originally, there are two bones. They later connect by an articulation, the symphysis mandibulae, which is actually still visible on adults. This is why some mammals like dogs are considered to have two bones and why Galeno thought it so.
I like the way the Scishow digs into niches of unsung heroes and heroines. The world is enough of those erroneous Aristotle things.
Vesalius hired an artist from the school of Titian (often thought to be Jan van Calcar) to create his illustrations. The video makes it sound like he was the artist himself.
Go home Aristotle, you're drunk.
I don't like how he trashes Aristotle so much. Despite him being wrong on many things. His work on metaphysics and epistemology became the foundations of modern science and technology. with out Aristotle's work on syllogism and formal logic you would not have modern-computer science or math as we know it today.
You also wouldn't have it as it was today if people never started to question what he was right
about, what he was wrong about and to what extent was he right in the first place.
As an artist, this episode was awesome!
No mention of Robert Hooke? He did some of the earliest scientific illustration using a microscope. His drawing of a flea is still one of my favorite pieces of illustration.
Three honorable mentions: Louis Agassiz Fuertes (wildlife), Chesley Bonestell (astronomy/space flight), and Frances Glessner Lee (forensics) ;)
this is the most interesting topic I've ever come across on your channel wow
James Autobot? I love that guy's work!
My favorite science illustrators usually work in the field of speculative biology, like Dougal Dixon (The New Dinosaurs), Wayne D. Barlowe (Expedition), and C.M. Kosemen (All Tomorrows). Highly recommended for the mind-f*cks, while still keeping it within the purview of science and realism.
Loved this list, I would really appreciate to see Margaret Mee in this list too.
She was one of the first botanical artist to work in Amazon Florest and was a very important environmentalists to draw attention to the impact of large-scale mining and deforestation on the Amazon Basin.
Maybe you folks could make a few videos about how art relies on calculus.
lazyperfectionist1 golden ratio
as an artist that sounds like some bullshit
I am slightly nit picking but, I was taught that Galen was a Roman physician taking many of his ideas from Hippocrates, including the four humours, I am only a secondary school student but I was taught this recently and my teacher is awesome. I might be wrong, anyways love your vids pls keep doing them, I learn a lot :)
He was a Greek Roman.
Lukas don just so I'm understanding right he was a person from the province of Greece in the Roman Empire?
Greece was part of the Roman Empire at that time. Empires consist of multiple countries. So he was from the country of Greece, which was part of the Roman Empire.
Lukas don thx for securing my knowledge, I appreciate you answering my question :)
Santa Claus was a Greek, from what is part of Turkey.
Newton did indeed show that light could be separated in a prism but he did not define the primary colours. It was James Clerk Maxwell who discovered that the additive mixtures of red blue and green light created white light.
No peek list: Audubon, Goethe, Da Vinci ...maybe Sibley and Peterson.
Edit: and thumbs up for pronouncing fungi the right way.. it's such a relief.
Love it!! I work in HS bio lab and getting kids to sketch what they're looking at through a microscope is like pulling teeth. Such a loss :( I hope this encourages some young illustrators!!
I was thinking among a similar vein except that it was how I hated having to draw anything when I was in school. I liked the different science classes I took despite the drawing parts. I prefered a good illustrated text to learn about stuff, I considered drawing a chore and doing chores it something I want to forget once I'm finished.
I agree with @SlyPearTree - especially if drawing is not something you can do at all, that practice of forced sketching can be detrimental to what I am trying to learn (college biology student, this hits home). As a prospective teacher, I see both sides, there needs to be another way to preserve the knowledge and the spirit of the student who finds drawing legitimately and literally painful.
Cherise Nunez Wow I never expected pushback haha. What a shame. It's not that they are *assigned* drawing, it's that they don't even have the desire to try. And that is a shame. If you were encouraged to draw at a younger age I doubt you'd be so averse to drawing now. It isn't about artistic ability but better visualization. Naturalists should be able to represent/visualize what they're talking about, and that starts in sketching or modeling. It's hardly a sacrifice to encourage students to TRY sketching a cell--which after all, is mostly squiggles if we're honest. Students today also don't take notes during class (they aren't obligated to), but those that do (and sketch what they see) mostly do better at information retention. Just my thoughts.
The fact that she it is literally "painful" to sketch made me lol.
Jaguar Domingo I drew as a kid and I drew all through school. Drawing cells was a) not an artistic assignment, it was just supposed to be a diagram and b) not as fun as drawing cute girls. Different artists have different specialisations.
Aristotelian Abiogenesis was firstly and primarily refuted by Francesco Redi in his paper "Esperienze Intorno alla Generazione degli Insetti" in 1668 - 7 years before Merian published her first book and nearly 40 years before "Metamorphosis insectarium Surinamensium." Abiogenesis was only truly disproven by Pasteur though in the 19th century with his swan-neck flask experiment.
This was very interesting.
someone just found their cajaling.
"Arostitle ... a bugger with the bottle" Monty Python.
This episode is beautiful! Thank you Sci Show!
Excellent video! Fascinating visuals and interesting topic!
If I could hug this video, I would.
Fun fact: if this is something you might be interested in doing, some universities and art schools let you major specifically in medical illustration.
I love science history videos like this! please do more!
interesting... because of Hank's pronunciation of 'fungi' I have learned that, in words of Greco-Latinate origin, a hard 'g' often proceeds the vowels 'a' 'o' and 'u' while the soft 'g' proceeds the vowels 'e' 'i' 'y'. Being that 'fungi' has its origin in Latin the soft g sound is correct. I thought it was a hard g.
No Frank H. Netter? His anatomy illustration is practically the Bible in anatomy courses.
That was my thought exactly. Netter is a necessity! Max Brödel is another amazing illustrator. (If you dig science crossed with graffiti, Shok-1)
HemlockSillage Never heard of Shok-1, but then I googled him/her and I was like HOOLLLLYY SHIT (in a good way).
But the bible is bullshit
Yes, it's bullshit. However, it's idiomatic use as "the single ultimate information source," isn't going to go away any time soon thanks to the prevalence of Christianity in English-speaking nations.
Just A Dude El Duderino speaks the truth.
I mean, I get where Aristotle was coming from. If you've ever seen a horse poop while it's walking around on a hot day, those flies literally seem to appear out of nowhere in a second or two.
what an amazing scishow episode!! 😍😍😍
9:46 Hmm... So I gave some thought into this: obviously, the color comes from the dichromate+silver oxirreduction, but the 'mystery' is as to why neurons are dyed randomly; given that the axons are lined with _sodium/potassium_ ion channels, I guess it's the counterions' fault; just swap K2Cr2O7 with, say, Rb2Cr2O7 or Cs2Cr2O7 (but any large cation would do), and do the test against a K2Cr2O7 control
*edit: a high-conc KCl solution may be a cheper alternative*
I've seen the glass flowers at the Natural History Museum at Harvard, they're really amazing!
Thank you for including in the western world when you mentioned the first illustration of human anatomy
i never know about this, and i love it so much!
thanks little Green!
Why does everybody complain about Olivia's hands and moving about when Hank and the other hosts do exactly the same thing? Can't we just appreciate all of the hosts for making these videos, and watch them for the content?
Kira I think it's more exaggerated with Olivia because she is bouncing all over the place while Hank is not.
Also, she's new.
Complain about complainers on a video where no one is complaining about what youre complaining about. Makes sense.
That's exactly my point. Nobody is complaining about Hank doing exactly the same thing as what they always complain about Olivia doing.
So yes, you're right. That *does* make sense.
I think you missed *my* point. Regardless, people like hank, many dont like Olivia...now what?
alot of blaschka stuff is in corning ny as well along with the torches definitely worth seeing in person crazy to think they made such accurate/realistic models on alcohol based torches
intelligent discriminative, selective and schematic drawings can do more than photographies or realistic representations because they can show an analytic understanding of any subject of study. Intelligent artists are fully needed in science and pedagogy of science.
"When Australia was still a pretty rough place to be". So, yesterday?
I really enjoyed this episode, thank you
Could you do an episode on chia seeds? Are they really a super food? Or do they just have great marketing?
I want that color wheel it looks amazing
this was an especially informative and interesting video. Thanks SciShow!
The mandible forms during fetal stages from two structures which merge at the midline. So, it really kinda does start out as two “bones” during development even though it is expressed as a single bone once a fetus is fully formed.
I love jellyfish illustrations by Ernst Haeckel. They look like some beautiful art nouveau ornaments. So awesome.
best of both worlds... loved this video subject
That was a good lecture. Presented any other way would have put me to sleep.
Kudos
Vesalius is very familiar to me and I have heard of Merian and Cajal's work. I get pretty nerdy about that kind of stuff. Potter's fascination with fungi was interesting to hear.
wowww i am so pleasantly surprised by the beatrix potter one!
He's more recent, but you can't get through medical school without the illustrations of Frank Netter
Blaschka glass! Oh my goodness I love their story. If anyone in the USA wants to see their work check out the Harvard museum of natural history!
Frank Netter is the anatomy art GOAT
I wish I could like this video 1000 times.
wow.. really good episode guys.. thanks
science and art 💟
Great topic, thanks guys!
Don't forget about Charles R Knights awesome paintings of extinct animals!
I'd include the work of Clemente Susini, La Specola's anatomical waxes in Florence are still astonishing nowadays.
I gave my brother an Audubon print of his favorite bird for Christmas :)
Hank, Hank, Hank... uh-nem-oh-nee, not an-enemy.
The University of Minnesota's Weisman's Art Center has an exhibition on Cajal work.