The Incredible Journey of Apollo 12
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ก.พ. 2025
- It's the ultimate buddy movie, with two astronauts hitting the road and landing on the moon. Earth. November 14, 1969. Three astronauts, with spacesuits, food, water, and a battery of scientific and communications equipment, prepared to fly to the moon. Thousands gathered at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, including President and Mrs. Richard Nixon, to witness the historic launch. It was raining that day, but that was no cause for delay. The ship that would carry them into space was designed to launch in any weather.
But how would it respond to a powerful electrical storm now gathering above the launch pad? That was just the beginning of the incredible journey of Apollo 12.
With three astronauts fastened into their seats, the countdown proceeded. Astronaut and Mission Commander Pete Conrad would say later: "The flight was extremely normal, for the first 36 seconds." The five engines of the Saturn 5's huge first stage were designed to burn through 5 million pounds of liquid oxygen in just two and a half minutes, and to send the spacecraft up 67 kilometers above the Atlantic Ocean.
When it reached an altitude of 2000 meters, something unexpected happened. Racing through the stormy environment, the rocket generated a lightning bolt that traveled down its highly conductive exhaust trail.
Another bolt hit 16 seconds later. All of the spacecraft's circuit breakers shut off. The tracking system was lost. A young flight controller in Houston, Texas instructed astronaut Alan Bean on how to turn on an auxiliary power system. The mission was back on track. Once in Earth orbit, all systems appeared to check out, and flight control officials gave the crew the green light to leave Earth.
The astronauts were not told of concern that the lighting strikes had damaged the pyrotechnic system used to deploy the parachutes that would ease them back through the Earth's atmosphere. If that system failed, the astronauts would not return alive.
This mission would have its share of perils, not unlike those faced by a long line of past explorers, whose courage and restless spirit propelled them into the unknown. This one, however, was backed by years of technology development, test flights, astronaut training, and the largest support team back home that any mission ever had.
But hundreds of thousands of kilometers out in space the three astronauts were pretty much on their own. What made Apollo 12 unique was the friendship and chemistry of its crew. Conrad, Bean, and Richard Gordon were all Navy men. Working and training together on the Gemini program, they had gained each other's respect and trust.
Now, hurtling across more than 400,000 kilometers to the moon, they prepared to fullfill the mission's goals. One was to set up a scientific station designed to record seismic, atmospheric, and solar data.
Another was to visit an unmanned lunar probe called Surveyor III that had landed there two and a half years before. The idea was to bring back a part to study the effect of the lunar environment.
A third goal was to improve on the landing of Apollo 11 just 5 months before. Dropping down over a region called the Sea of Tranquility, pilot Neil Armstrong found himself heading straight for a crater full of boulders. He had to fly over the planned landing site and find a new one. Now kilometers beyond the target, the lander, called Eagle, was literally running out of gas.
With less than 30 seconds of fuel left, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin finally touched down on a landscape obscured by dust stirred up by the vehicle's thrusters. Future astronauts would have to be able to make precision landings at locations dictated by science. That meant they would have to touch down on landscapes filled with all kinds of rocks and craters.
For Apollo 12, the science pointed to a region known as the Ocean of Storms, some 2000 kilometers from where the Eagle had landed. Here, the landscape is dark from lava that cooled to form its flat expanse billions of years ago.
When training setbacks actually turn out to be the best thing that can ever happen for you. God that was a wonderfully cheerful and brilliant trio on that mission.
Corona virus got me watching at all types of things
That's great, but remember to don't let yourself become fooled by stories like this. Mankind has never travelled to the moon in reality, of course.
@MrTheredpill05 No, it is not related sir. "There are more things in between heaven & earth than are dreamt of in your pholosophy" - Hamlet
K Bro: Take no notice of these morons. Just ask them to substantiate their claims and you'll find that they know nothing about the Apollo missions or science in general. In fact probably nothing about anything worthwhile. But then, you probably already realise that.
@MrTheredpill05 Ok corrected and self admonishment duly administered. Now, what about the rest of it?
@MrTheredpill05 Explain your reasons for agreeing with WarthDader74
s initial comment.
When I get out of bed in the morning and put my feet on the floor, I say, "That's one small step for a man..."
omG.. sooo funny i forgot to *LoL* haHA
Yes and then I get back in bed
Hahahahaha
One giant leap for an introvert.
@@jimmy2k4o True
My Father always kept saying "see, if they had long hairs they wouldn't even be able to wear their helmet!"
Is a good argument :v
Now we know that you have long hair but we don't know where I kept the fucks I gave
@@rolandfrei3924
QP
Great video it's outstanding all the work that goes into each astro launch. And having the Germans on our side to do the first launch for orbit
@@anthonytindle5758 Are you going to be a spaceman when you grow up too ?
These videos prove how tiny we are with respect to the Universe but still we go on fighting among ourselves.
??? it does? Was not sure? Dont ants fight? Not like we have are own planet yet...
e
@@narajuna Do you want to be a spaceman when you grow up. ?
@@bepythebear2077 nah all dead up there, plane pilot is more fun even if much more dangerous.
Because we do not yet understand Our humanity and Divinity yet in 2021.
Can't we just go back to the moon every 10 years or so, just to spark space interest every now and then for people? We need it now more than ever
+NASACrooks go fuck yourself troll
+NASACrooks cause you're a bullshitting sack of shit
+NASACrooks I don't agree with you, but I will attempt to have a reasonable debate with you.
Give me one valid piece of evidence that will show me that humans have never sent a spacecraft to the moon.
+NASACrooks Just like anyone else who believes something in spite of its having been debunked over and over and over, you have exactly two ways of dealing with people and providing evidence isn't one of them. There's "you're all sheep!" a purely emotional argument for anyone who says you're wrong, and "do your own research!" for anyone who who's willing to debate you. It's always the same, all you have is emotional arguments.
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. - Christopher Hitchens
***** Yeah, silence = guilt... any competent lawyer will tell you that the first/best defense to any allegation is to acknowledge it and immediately treat it as if it were a credible belief. lol
They mostly haven't acknowledged your crackpottery because taxpayers aren't funding them to argue with conspiracy theorists online... go figure, right?
I still see you offering no evidence btw, just more "you're dumb if you don't believe me" nonsense, and some claims that the people who've made you look like fools aren't to be trusted because they're not renowned enough lol... if THAT was how you always made your belief/nonbelief decisions you wouldn't be on here arguing a position held by a bunch of people utterly shunned by the scientific community.
Can u imagine ! They should have kept it going, would be light years ahead in space exploration and knowledge of our universe, and perhaps made it to MARS.
According to Gary McKinnon, the UK hacker the US wanted to extradite and Theresa May refused, the US already has a presence on Mars!
@@brianburden3912 is there any articles or videos on that that you know, I’d like to read or watch some of that
And yet they lost all data and don't know how to do it anymore.
In 2007 I had the honour of meeting Alan Bean. Lovely man and sadly missed.
In 1976 I had the honor of meeting Neil Armstrong. Was so happy to shake the hand of the first human to step onto the surface of the moon.
@@georgehenderson7783
One small lie for a freemason, one giant eternity in the bottomless pit!
Not bad for a misguided satanist and liar unto the grave. Probably hanging out around
an extra HOT campfire right about now, screaming to just get a glimpse of some h2o?
He went to my high school
@@jack-jm6nj WOW!!!!
If I ever got to stay on the Moon for a few months, I would sit in my glass dome bedroom and just watch the Earth rotate. :)
@MrTheredpill05 - You said "NASA says the Magnetosphere, deep space and the Moon are bathed in poisonous levels of ionising radiation."
Radiation exposure is accumulative (surely you know that?). So why pretend that the duration of exposure to such radiation doesn't matter? Why ignore it other than to distort the facts?
And spacecraft have to survive events that can cause a massive spike in the radiation levels, such as a huge solar storm that could ruin a satellite if the electronics are not designed to cope with such a storm.
Therefore your point is null and void, since it is exceptional rare that the electronics would have to cope with 100,000 rads, BUT they need to be able to cope in case an event like a massive solar storm occurs that could destroy it.
@MrTheredpill05 - In other words, you have no evidence to support your implied claim that radiation on the moon would have any noticeable effect upon the Apollo astronauts for the time they had spent on the moon.
What you believe a nation would or wouldn't be willing to do in terms of risk is irrelevant, since this is about evidence, not unfounded opinion.
And you have pretended, since you were suggesting that the maximum radiation satellites are designed to withstand is a measure of the radiation levels in space for manned missions, ignoring the fact that at 22,300 miles 'up' all geostationary satellites are operating inside the Van Allen belts and hence are subject to higher radiation on a daily basis, AND they must cope with rare solar storms which can cause those radiation levels to rise SIGNIFICANTLY over a short period of time.
Hence completely irrelevant to any discussion about manned missions in space like Apollo.
Present evidence from those who have *actually* worked on spacecraft sent into space who *explicitly* say the radiation for a mission to the moon and back would be fatal to astronauts.
You have the entire world and 50+ years to choose from :-)
@MrTheredpill05 - As Dr Van Allen said, Van Allen radiation is strongest at around 1000 miles up and would present a fatal dose of radiation to an astronaut inside a Space Shuttle at that distance after *ONE WEEK INSIDE* the belts.
So a few hours inside the Van Allen belts is not a health problem to people.
So again, instead of giving me your *uneducated spin on radiation that you clearly don't understand,* give me evidence from those who have actually worked on spacecraft sent into space who *explicitly say* the radiation for a mission to the moon and back would be fatal to astronauts.
Again, you have the entire world and 50+ years to choose from, so why is that so difficult for you if your claims were true?
So let me see/hear it stated explicitly from an experienced organ grinder, not from an inexperienced monkey :-)
If you can't do that, then you effectively admitted that your claims here are null and void.
@MrTheredpill05 - Give me evidence from those who have actually worked on spacecraft sent into space who *explicitly* say the radiation for a mission to the moon and back would be fatal to astronauts.
Again, you have the entire world and 50+ years to choose from, so why is that so difficult for you if your claims were true?
So let me see/hear it stated explicitly from an experienced organ grinder, not from an inexperienced monkey :-)
If you can't do that, then *you effectively admitted that your claims here are null and void.*
@MrTheredpill05 - The fact that you end with a video featuring clips ripped from mostly non-NASA sources (eg. films, documentaries, adverts etc) says it all.
Hence you've admitted your claims here are null and void.
It is not the atmosphere that prevents us from seeing stars during the day, but the brightness of whatever else is in the view. You can't have two things with such different levels of brightness in a single picture and expect them both to be clearly visible.
What I had found out was that a technician assembling the surveyor probe had sneezed and the bacteria got on the part which actually survived the time on the moon.
22:45
"Conrad, Bean, and *GORDON*. Say his name, he contributed just as much to the success of this mission as anyone.
SMH...
@Friday Goood
Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were not part of Apollo 12. They were part of Apollo 11.
This is a video documentary on Apollo ** 12 **
C'mon man - get your history straight - mmmkay??
He was talking about the astronauts who walked on the moon. The only four at that time he mentioned
@P. Spit Cool, I found one of the moon-hoax retards who downvoted the video.
Without CMP Dick Gordon, Pete and Al’s bodies would still be on the ocean of storms.
CMPs always fail to get the respect they deserve.
Amazing talent these astronauts have. Manage completely perfect lands 100% of the time, having never done an actual landing before. Then, do even disturb the dust on the moon.
I'm not sure what are you talking about. None of the _Apollo_ landings were perfect, and they certainly did disturb the dust on the Moon.
Apollo 12 landed hard - as did 16. Apollos 15 and 17 (J missions) like 16 were heavier and buckled the engine bells. 15 landed at an angle and there was a fear that it might have tipped over. Also the descents were far from perfect.
What on earth are you talking about, you can actually see the dust being disturbed in the footage whilst during the landing of Apollo 11, Aldrin observes "picking up some dust now".
Because of the annular eclipse today JUNE 21,2020. Got my curiosity and interest on planets. Watching all of these my knees were shaking i don't even have an inch of braveness to do such. These people are wonderful oh gosh.
Really? Having a whole country behind you with all of its technical expertise got you shaking at your knees?
It’s exploration dude. It’s fun, exciting and can be dangerous but NASA really did it properly with descent respect for the people they sent out there.
They were some of the most prepared, well cared for and informed people of any generation mankind has created. You shouldn’t be shaking at the knees and talking of bravery. Talk about being excited and thrilled at the prospect that they could do it and everyone around them was actually part of the process even if someone just worked at a 7-11.
Don’t be afraid, worried or live in dread. Work toward the very thing that these guys did, which is simply making things better! I’m not articulating myself well, but fear keeps us from doing noble things! Don’t be afraid, take motivation and inspiration from things like this and don’t let fear freeze your soul! Whatever it is you want to work at in life!
Good luck champ!
Pete Conrad was my favorite astronaut. He had a great sense of humor but did a very professional job. CBS News broadcaster Walter Cronkite got so angry at him for saying how it was a short one for Neil but long one for him. Referring to jumping off the ladder to the foot pad, Then stepping onto the Lunar surface. But that was classic Pete Conrad.
Why would Wally get angry?
@@vratarportirgolman he got hungry easily
Although the command capsules electronics shut down for several moments as well as tracking data, the rockets auto navigation computer is located in the rocket assembly itself and wasnt affected by the lightning strike.
So the rocket thankfully flew perfectly despite the command capsule systems shutting down.
Your Phone has more computing power than all of the entire Apollo missions combined. lol
No it doesn't. Eventually the processing power will be exaggerated into "Your iPhone has more computing power than the entire NASA Space Centre and all of Florida.
@@Randor10 What are you talking about dude. The iPhone Xs has much, much more processing power than all of the Apollo missions combined times a factor of god only knows. This is such common, indisputable knowledge. The Apollo missions used processors with the power of a modern graphing calculator.
Please...those wankers wish they had iphones when they orbited the earth for days.
@@bodombeastmode arduino uno (atmega328p) is more powerful than AGC computer and now costs about 5 dollars.
Pointless statement. Not laugh out loud funny. Moron.
Apollo 12 had more bad luck with cameras than any three people in history -- but what a great success their mission was! Finding surveyor and bring back all the samples. Here's to Pete, Alan and Richard!
watch carefully @ 20:06, They gave us proof it was fake. Look at the small satellite dish on the right, notice it gets caught in the invisible strings.
@@shanktheglobe954 How do you know Columbus ever sailed to America? How do you know the Wright Brothers ever flew a plane? You accept those, but think you are a model of sharp mindedness because of your juvenile and lazy trolling.
@@brianarbenz1329 are you blind man? What's your explanation for the dish? Cognitive dissonance much?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂you are very naive
In many ways being on Apollo 12 (or 14 through 17) would have been better than being on 11. The weight of expectation, the immensity of the achievement and the public responsibility placed a burden on the Apollo 11 crew, especially Neil, that I can barely imagine.
Pete, Dick and Al would have been laser focused on their mission between July and November, with a fraction of the attention and expectation on their shoulders.
watch carefully @ 20:06, They gave us proof it was fake. Look at the small satellite dish on the right, notice it gets caught in the invisible strings.
Has anyone seen pictures taken from the Moon, showing.... stars ?
This would settle the conspiracy debate about the Apollo missions, once and for all : were the astronauts just in close orbit, or really, on the moon ?
And stars act as a natural GPS for hikers, sailors.. and yes, astronauts too.
Give me a photo of stars, and I'll tell you *exactly* where the photographer was.
No shot
If the camera exposure was set in order to capture the stars, the moon would look burnt white.
@@theoharisvarnas5315 Or you could take TWO photos : 1 for the ground, 1 for the sky.
I admire the precision of the moon landing, the LEM having landed very close to Surveyor 3!
All without Sat Nav, using sextants and slide rules. Incredible indeed.
So incredible , like its fake ??????
@@thetwogardens6048 Incredible = unbelievable.
@Enyaw Yeah--guess what you can see clearly (and navigate by) when you get out of Earth's atmosphere and into space? That's right--the Earth, the Moon, the Sun, and the constellations! Remind me never to go anywhere with you as navigator :-)
LEM-on!
One of the most memorable moments of my Life was watching Neil Armstrong step onto the Lunar Surface! I was 12, the perfect age to fully enjoy such a moment. With awe and wonder I watched Men walk on the Moon! To think there are a few people who think the Apollo Missions were a hoax baffles me. The program was watched closely by the entire world. Even a hint of a "hoax" would have outraged millions of people. Anyone suggesting such a thing would have been tarred and feathered in '69...
Hey :)
"Nine years ago"
Add the fact they they brought back parts of the Surveyor 3 probe, and the hoaxtards will be silenced.
Don't believe that shit it's a lie hollywood
@@somewheredowntheroad2274 Your brain never happened.
Who put the camera there to film it?
Yes absolutely INCREDIBLE. Unbelievable !!!
Its nonsense pure bullshit garbage.. if you believe we went to the moon in 1969 and NASA with unlimited funding says they cant go in 2021. Your beyond help. The brainwashing and conditioning is beyond logic and reason.
I don't believe in that either, but I still appreciate the technology of that time.
@@SANDUSINTESCU let's see the technology of the time. 👉a camera the size of a cinderblock, a cardboard box wrapped in foil on 4 pvc pipes and 4 dixie plates glued on bottom of PVC pipes, NASA called them the landers. The plates ain't even fully wrapped in foil. They must of ran out roll of foil and Radio shack was closed. Very.impressive fish story. Moby dick ain't got nothing on this story.
@@00tonytone
YOU SAID: "Its nonsense pure garbage."
== No. You have confused the Apollo program with your own education, which is the real garbage here.
YOU SAID: "if you believe we went to the moon in 1969 and NASA with unlimited funding says they cant go in 2021."
== Wow, how completely backward could you be? In the height of the Apollo program in the 1960s, NASA received 4.5% of the entire federal budget. Add in soft costs and international support, and you're talking about the equivalent of about 2% more of the entire federal budget. That's about 6.5% of the entire federal budget given to NASA, a vast majority of which went straight into Apollo. After Apollo ended, they stripped NASA's budget down to about 0.5% of the federal budget, which was less than a tenth of what they had been getting during the height of Apollo spending. And, congress' appropriations committee took that 0.5%, and spread it out among hundreds of programs over the years, never again assigning such a large amount of money to a single NASA program ever again. You are BACKWARD!!! Completely BACKWARD!!!!! The funding was nearly unlimited in 1965, not in 2021. Good grief.
YOU SAID: "Your beyond help."
== My beyond help? What does that mean? Was that your illiterate attempt at saying "you're"?
YOU SAID: "The brainwashing and conditioning is beyond logic and reason."
== Let's see here... it's been about 50 years since Apollo. During Apollo, the Soviets confirmed that the USA landed on the moon because they were tracking the missions with radio telescopes and radar. Lots of countries did. Madagascar. Australia. Spain. Britain. Wales. Turks and Caicos. Ascension Island. Canary Islands. Guam. USA mainland. Hawaii. The list goes on. All of those countries, and more, tracked Apollo missions. Since then, Japan sent JAXA/Selene to orbit the moon (2008), and it confirmed Apollo. China sent their orbiters to the moon, and says they confirmed Apollo also. Arizona State University sent LRO in 2009, and it's been sending photographs back from the moon that show the Apollo hardware on the moon, foot paths, rover tracks, etc. Since July 20, 1969, and literally every single day since then, laser ranging facilities around the world have bounced lasers off of the reflectors left on the moon during Apollo. For about 5 years after Apollo, every single day, the nuclear powered Apollo equipment packages were sending back experiment data for the lunar surface temperature readings, seismometers, heat flow experiments, etc. Literally every single one of the world's 72 space agencies, including enemy countries, have acknowledged Apollo, without a single one of them, not one, not ever, denying Apollo happened. Oh, but it's "beyond logic and reason" to think your ridiculous conspiracy garbage is true??? Why? Because a conspiracy video told you so?
@@rockethead7 who filmed liftoff and the lem contraption flying across space. ET from his spaceship.
Dont give.me that crap that the camera's were.on the lem. Because its 3rd person angle. If the camera was on lem . The lem wouldn't Be getting smaller and smaller . The moon would be the one getting smaller as camera goes up up and away with lem. Seriously I repeat thats common sense. Watch video of the camera on a drone then watch video of the drone being filmed which angle is the apollo hoax Ray charles can see the difference .
Also Check out the boots soul on display . Its smooth but those boots left a boot impression with zigzag thread on the moon.
We are about 500 years from where science fiction expected us to be by now. But we are headed there.
Headed where?? oh... towards more fiction...
@@allpeoplefreepeople Nope. toward the knowledge of what is fiction and what is not. Do YOU know if someday "warp drive" will be possible? A better question is: Do you believe it will be?
At 3:00 in this video: The flight controller was John Aaron and he said “set SCE to AUX” it was NOT an auxiliary power system as the
narrator said, but Signal Conditioning Equipment (SCE) switch which allowed the telemetry to flow and let them troubleshoot and restore
everything once in orbit.
I love how the narrator emphasizes that they didnt sleep the night on the moon... LOL who could your on the moon, you can sleep when you die, it's the moon! Im not sleeping I am taking it all in.
[BNHO]BCommando85 --They didn't go to the moon.
Balls Out Physics ( Brian Mullin) has a really cool video 'SPACE IS HARD'. He explains the ISS is bogus simply because heat from the sun and the occupants would cook the AstroNots , A L I V E--
On earth heat moves to cooler areas thru a medium like water or air, or touching other metal, but in space ...THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE.
Recently, NASA says it's 'Dark Matter ' that conducts the heat away....
O M G, more science BULL SHIT.......
AND, The AstroNots fucking hair disgusts me too!!
NASA are faking idiots thinking they can fool us‼️‼️. It's Not natural and it's bogus not having hair nets on, IF IT WAS REAL!!
Women shed a lotta hair, folks, and IN A REAL I S S --- they'd be eating and breathing hair ALL THE FAKING TIME!!
WAKE UP WORLD!!
More proof of a flat earth. Please watch one of these 3 videos showing airplane EMERGANCY landings. There are entitled
Six Emergancy Landings....
Skipping sleep is pretty dangerous if you're on the Moon and have to drive all the way home. Indulging in that excitement could be as dangerous as trying to fly on LSD.
@@iarrcsim2323 So is being in the vacuum of space with just a very thin wall keeping you alive. being on the moon etc.. We all know lack of sleep causes issues, but hell man it's the moon! And no it takes weeks of no sleep to get to the "LSD" level lol.. And they don't drive all the way home, they make occasional course corrections with the assistance of a flight computer, your hands are not on the wheel or throttle 24/7 lol.. I think you have no clue what LSD does lol
@@cheesestickfpv6162 space travel is extremely dangerous even with all possible precautions taken. Intentionally skipping sleep would add risk to a huge pile of nasty life-threatening risks. It would be as dangerous as playing with LSD on the roof of a building and testing if it'll give superhuman flight powers. I didn't mean that skipping a night of sleep would make them act as crazy as someone high on LSD. Maybe you'd take a risk like that but I doubt the professional astronauts lose that much focus on their work, life, and their loved ones when visiting incredibly exotic places like the Moon.
@@iarrcsim2323 They did not sleep the night they stayed .... you did not watch the video did you.
"Apollo 12, all present and accounted for, Sir!" lol
Rest in Peace Alan Bean. A true pioneer.
He was a great Freemason Liar. RIP Mr. Bean. You sold the BS like no other.
@@mb4lunchshut up
@@mb4lunch Nice attempt at trolling, go find a better way to troll.
@@robertoroberto9798 aren't you a troll?
@@stolearovigor281 I don’t fish, so no.
As a boy growing up with Mercury, Gemini and Apollo, I was fascinated. I began a scrape book on everything related to NASA and space program, starting in 64, age 8. Later I had models of all manned space craft, with the LEM being my favorite. Myself and two friends all had varying telescopes, but Chuck had a fantastic10 inch scope. I learned so much about astronomy with my friends, school science became boring and redundant. In July, 69 the excitement and anticipation became almost unbearable, I was 13. Watching man journey into space and land on the moon was almost beyond description. I'm 63 now, thought mankind's exploration into space would be ''light year's'' ahead of where we are now in 2019. Disappointed doesn't begin to describe my feelings about current NASA and the''non believer's'' of man's landing on the moon, flat earth and other lame B.S. theories. I'm hopeful I'll live to experience man landing on Mar's, thought it would already taken place decades ago. I wish for mankind's hatred and Waring ways to be replaced , by the worldwide pride, sense of brotherhood and shared achievement, as man walked on another celestial body. However fleeting that moment may have been, I still have hope for mankind's future, it's innate, common quest for exploration, may bring us together, as one culture, one people.
Space is fake numbnut
It's sad that the powers that be would spend most of our tax dollars on weapons of war.
I managed to land on M'arse once
The 'J' missions were cool (and had hours of tv), but I've got a special place in my heart for Apollo 12. Neat guys and a neat mission, especially cutting off bits of the Surveyor.
Apollo 12 was not a 'J' mission. They were 15 and 16.
You're right of course. I accidentally left out a 'but' (which I've added now) and it messed up my meaning.
Real shame they lost the surface TV though, I wonder if this contributed to the rapid drop off of public interest in the lunar missions? There was little directly for the public to see.
I just saw some guy saying that the astronauts on the International Space Station would be cooked to death. I don’t understand why he thinks that. It‘s -270 degrees celcius in space. I read about why it is so cold on google :„This is most likely because of the lack of atmosphere and the vacuum-like nature of space - with very few molecules to energetically bounce around, there can be no heat.“ Also in the ISS, it's a matter of heat distribution. One side is cold, the other really hot due to solar radiation (like feeling the sunlight on your skin). ... In space it's a matter of insulation. Just as your blanket keeps your body heat in so you stay warm in bed, NASA space suits have insulation systems as well as heaters.
@David Brackin It’s cold outside the spacecraft, not inside. Isn’t it simple reasoning?
As good ole' Ricky Bobby said, "if you ain't first, you're last". I wish we could see this today in HD cameras. We spend trillions in military, it should go to NASA.
question? the moon is 238,000 miles away. they got there in 4 days which would require them to fly at 2500 mph, when no plane on earth could fly and that speed. Where was all the fuel stored for 500,000 miles and were was the rover stored. And when it left the moon sparks where shown where space has no atmosphere.
new england patriot they flew that fast because they weren't on earth the rover was stored in one of the panels on the lunar module and the "sparks" are the foil material that covers the lunar module flying off from the engine blast. The lunar module had two stages descent stage and the ascent stage. The fuel for the descent stage was stored in the panels that I mentioned earlier and the bulges on the ascent stage of the lunar module are where the fuel is stored. Hope this helped you
@@godzillafan2058 thanks but wasn't this a very small capsule? Thats a lot of fuel to go nearly 500,000 miles
Great video and I like it shows one of the less broadcasted missions due to a camera problem. Forget the jerks that just want to say fake to everything. They are just seeking attention due to their ignorance, I believe. Our attention should go to the astronauts and all who made this possible
@felix mendez You are concerned about something that is just a waste of time to question. Go and use your energy on something useful in life instead of this questioning everything in the world,. You dont have better things to do? What about questioning the billionaire politicians and fellow billionaires?
@felix mendez I think i will start to seriously question why the sea is water, when everybody knows its an illusion made by french TV by jacques cousteau. Wake up guys, We are being cheatened and i cannot take this any longer
Amazing that we got 12 humans to walk the moon. 2020 forward with more to come... Exciting times with spaceX
Yes, and the launch of the SLS rocket which will take the Orion space capsule around the moon and back to Earth for its second test in space. If successfully, then everything looks good for a 2024 manned mission *around* the moon (I'm skeptical that a lander would be ready on time for 2024, but we'll see :-)).
@MrTheredpill05 - Stop lying please.
Obama's plan was for missions in lunar orbit and to a near Earth asteroid in preparation for a future mission to Mars. Key to this was the development of the SLS rocket, which was originally due for completion and hence it's debut launch in 2017.
The SLS has suffered delays, but is now effectively complete and ready for its debut launch this year, THREE YEARS LATE.
Common sense would tell you that delays in the SLS required for missions to the moon would result in delays to those missions. So years ago those plans were revised for the first manned mission to the moon (lunar orbit) in 2024, with a possible manned landing in 2028.
The current administration wants to pull that 2028 target forward to 2024, hence remove the delay, which is a riskier option.
Why can't you take the time to get the facts right? Why do so many conspiracy believers complain about governments and authorities lying and yet you think it's justified for you to lie?
@MrTheredpill05 - Obama won the election in November 2008, where his inauguration was in January 2009. So, can you work it out yet? :-)
@MrTheredpill05 - Ignoring history doesn't make your case my friend.
In 2004-2005 George Bush announced the cancellation of the Space Shuttle and a new "Constellation program" to take astronauts to the moon and Mars, requiring the development of rockets and space capsules.
The Space Shuttle was scheduled to retire in 2010, and a new rocket from the Constellation program was suppose to be ready for test launches in 2008 and in place to take astronauts to the ISS when the Shuttle retired.
*That* was the plan and it was widely accepted, including by Obama.
But when Obama came into power, the dismantlement of the Shuttle program was on track, but the rocket to replace it was no where near completion, meaning the USA will need to rely upon Russia to get astronauts to the ISS.
The Augustine Committee in 2009 found that the Constellation program was over budget and well behind schedule, where it could not continue without a MASSIVE increase in funding! And that was at a time of the financial crisis that hit the world!
So it required a change of plan (well duh!).
Hence Obama cancelled the Constellation program, kept the good 'stuff' (such as the Orion space capsule), gave the Shuttle an extra year, and announced a new financially viable program to the moon and Mars, where NASA will focus on deep space missions with a new SLS rocket (due to launch this year), and low Earth orbit would be handed over to PRIVATE companies who through innovation could do it better and cheaper, hence the acceleration in companies like Space X and Blue Origin to develop their rockets and space capsules for the contracts being offered to them by NASA.
On what basis do you think the information above should be ignored when looking at what happened and why?
I don't share your hatred of the USA (and no, I'm not American in case you're wondering :-)). The USA has it's good and it's bad, like ALL nations/countries, where the more powerful a nation/country is, then the greater the good it can do and the greater the bad it can do. So the USA is not unique in that respect.
And I always feel we should be careful what we wish for. The downfall of a nation/country is rarely an isolated event, it usually has a knock on effect which is often unpredictable. Hence the crash that you wished for could have had a disastrous effect upon your life if it happened, regardless of your location in the world, all due to a chaotic domino/ripple effect.
We can never know of course, but I do warn against being so willing to wish pain upon others, whatever form that 'pain' is and whoever those 'others' may be :-|
With earned deference to Elon Musk and SpaceX, the elan, bravery, engineering, intelligence and military precision was so brilliant,we shall never see its like again.
God bless these guys all!
more elon musk circlejerking
Imagine being on the Apollo 12 team. Apollo 11 has already been successful and now you have to repeat that even though you know things are more likely to go wrong than go well. The pressure, in a certain light, was far greater than the preceding event.
after the Apollo 11 movie i thought they couldn't top it...but they managed to out do themselves with the true sequel Apollo 13
@@khold1983 - You dropped your tin foil hat. Let me pick that up for you. There you go... good as new.
The fate of Antarctica is the fate of all the world's landmasses. It isn't going anywhere....quickly.
The United States' Apollo 11 was the first crewed mission to land on the Moon, on 20 July 1969. There have been six crewed U.S. landings (between 1969 and 1972) and numerous uncrewed landings, with no soft landings happening from 22 August 1976 until 14 December 2013.
uuuhhhhh hate to tell you, nobody has ever been to the moon garry. Wake up man.
@@ShenTree Apollo 11 was the spaceflight that landed the first two people on the Moon. Commander Neil Armstrong and lunar module pilot Buzz Aldrin, both American, landed the Apollo Lunar Module Eagle on July 20, 1969,
@@krakenix_7849 The sound alone from sitting on top of those rockets would have liquefied their organs.
@@ShenTree er, no
I would love to have one of those F1 engines in my backyard and just start it up once in awhile just to drown out my neighbors dog.
china type2 bass rocker nothing else like it in my lifetime. was at a point (standing by my parked company car) about 7 miles from the launch pad and witnessed a launch. the sound is like a constant thunder, and even the ground you stand on actually vibrates. stunningly awesome. (I worked as sales rep for Standard Oil of New Jersey, out of Orlando at the time.
Lol
In terms of viability, the F1 engines were fake -- no matter how hard they try now to prop them up along with NASA and the Apollo record. . Apollo is a Swiss cheese and palatable for those who wish to believe in it. .
I'd settle for a J-2 engine , its a bit more fuel efficient and cheaper to run...... should still make enough noise to drown out the barking dog
@@ronaldgreene5733 STFU, pathetic conspiracy theorist. Go shove your tin foil hat up your ass.
Figuring out what God put in place has always fascinated me.
Absolutely 💯
Bravo! That was amazing!
All done by mirrors Walt Disney "The Incredible Journey"🤣
@@stephenwright8103 no they don't take disabled people like you at nasa they take aerospace engineers. 🤣
Alan Bean said in later interviews that, after they sorted out the lightning strike issues, they giggled their way to orbit.
I recommend reading the transcript for the launch. It is terrifying, impressive, and hilarious.
American 'truth" about landing on the Moon 1969 = american "truth "about biological weapon in Iraque 2003.America creates its own "truth"🤣🤣🤣
I was 13 years old when the L E M landed in the Sea of Tranquility. 50 years later no human has traveled further than the Moon. I would have thought we would have colonies on Mars by then but in reality the Lunar Landing was driven by Cold War competition with the U S S R. It is so sad.
What is the thresh hold for going back . 100 years , 200 , or never ! been
The budget man
But at least we are actually getting on with it now
Wow !!! Now I want to learn about this topic more and interested also upload some more videos about this. 👍🏻👍🏻🌜
From 3:32 -3:58 is Apollo 13 footage, lol at 7:59-8:08, the same thing. At 8:22-8:28 you see Fred Haise with his Apollo 13 mission patch floating into the LM. At 20:00, the LM is shown with the descent stage still attached as it rondevous with the Command Module. The lower stage was left on the moon.
You got one keen eye, no TOP comment for You! Yes they used the descending for ascending :)
A spectacular visual thoroughly presented .Thanks And welldone. I salute all of you.
I'd go to the moon in a nanosecond, the problem is we don't have the technology to do that anymore. We used to but we destroyed that technology and it's a painful process to build it back again.
This is why people say it never happened 😂. It’s just beyond stupid to say they destroyed it and now we can’t go
I saw the video of the science guy explaining this is why we can’t go back was what he said
Even the blueprints 🙄
Sure we destroyed it sure
I WAS AT THE LAUNCH! I was with a group of Camp Fire Girls, selected from around the country You can see me at .35 on the video. Upper left hand corner, one man on the left, then me. White Horizon Club blazer, blue cap--LONG blonde hair back then! We all stood with then-President Nixon and his family. Something I'll never forget-not only watching the rocket "blast off", but then, a few seconds later, seeing it hit by lightening!
You'll have to explain to the millennials what a camp fire girl was
Thank you Jane - I can see you there close to President Nixon. If you tell the truth then this was maybe something you will not forget in your life and you are an eyewitness of Apollo 12, I was not even 8 years old, and Apollo 11 was just 4 month ago, something so amazing! Its so many people not believing in this, but always wondering where this very Huge Rocket went otherwise!
Thanks again, Best Greetings out of Bavaria, Germany!
@@kulmainer Greetings from the USA! My family originally came from Germany! I'm so glad you enjoyed the video, too. I found ME, just by accident, last week! I nearly fell over! Many happy memories from those days, for sure!
Jane, thanks! I could only see this on German TV, however this was all so impressing to us. I was just 7.5 years old with Apollo 11 launching to the moon, but with my Grandad of 68 years sitting next to me in tears I can still so clearly remember to this moment in human history! Also we had a day off from school so we could watch the first step onto the moon by Neil Armstrong.
The amazing thing however is, that all of this Apollo Missions were becoming almost like a routine, and people were asking about why all these flights to the moon, why all this money?
However, I´m 57 now and wondering if to see man on the moon again within my lifetime! All the Best out of Germany!!
@MrTheredpill05 , if you are true than this whole world and society could collapse within just a few days! But you must prove this with scientific arguments! I am not a scientist but if you are please go ahead!
This documentary is what made Apollo 12 my favourite mission and also made me a total die hard Apollo fan
. . Another over the top comment in the attempt to support endemic corruption within government and related corporate activity . . Turn on your television -- Fake is real . .
Watching November 2019
better to have a look at: A funny thing happened on the way to the moon...... Or: Astronauts gone wild......
Its gonna show you one of the problems.
And better to have a look at an episode of Science in action, episode 255. It shows you exactly the problem.
But ey, Alice in Wonderland is ofcourse a much nicer produced fake bullshit cartoon than reality ever will be. So it is ofcourse much nicer to believe in such fairy tales than to deal with reality.
Mha Yheng i am waching on 16 november from india time mornong 7;30 am
Eu sou do Brazil e estou vendo e assistindo tv , em Dezembro 2019 11/12
@@bertjesklotepino 'A funny thing happened on the way to the moon' has a piece of footage of the earth supposedly from low earth orbit. Anyone who can accept that just doesn't understand!!! If you think that footage is really from LEO please let me know and I'll explain the real situation!!!
@@johnwoody9505 sir...
not interested to be honest.
The fact that in 50 years we have not gone back.....
Plus the fact that we still cant go back.....
Plus the fact that the project for All Mankind has been distorted in every way possible (like say: erasing tapes, no blue prints what so ever, etc etc etc)
Plus the fact that that project has never been commercialized eventhough there are plenty of billionaires who would have liked to have a nice little secluded place up there (Wanna bet Epstein and his kind would have liked to have had a base up there??????)
Plus the fact that from Bill Clinton to the current president, they all promised to go back to the moon and yet we havent gone back still.....
Plus the fact that all of em astronauts went wild and even using violence.....
Plus what mr Buzz Aldrin said during the interview he had with mr Sibrel.............
Plus a shitload of other Facts and details....
All of em combined is enough for me to not believe in fairy tales.
However, you may continu believing in fairy tales.
Let me know in 25 years if we have gone back. Or if we have people traveling to Mars.
So no sir, i dont require you to bullshit me.
A Blind Guy can see how we is being fooled when looking at that shot where they supposedly were 130000 miles out.
A BLIND GUY can SEE that that is as FAKE as ever.
You ofcourse wanna bullshit along. Go ahead.
I dont care.
A Blind Guy can see it, and a brainless monkey understands it. There is No Way in hell that we have been there as humanbeings.
Neil expected to see a base up there in his life time. And considering the time they had, the EVA's, they could have had a base up there already long time ago.
But as already said, there are Enough Reasons for Reasonable doubt.
You go ahead and keep believing in Santa Claus, he may fit through the chimney one day.
Great stuff ! Thank you for this. Learning more about Apollo 12 with fantastic footage. What an incredibly exciting time this was. I will never forget these brave astronauts.
watch carefully @ 20:06, They gave us proof it was fake. Look at the small satellite dish on the right, notice it gets caught in the invisible strings.
One the crew said thats a hell of a way to break AL BEAN into space flight ! Lmao 😂
Man... wish we had a space program here. I wanted to go to the moon since I was 5, loved the space programs. Guess the closest I'll be to space is in airplanes. D:
Greetings from Singapore. ^^
American 'truth" about landing on the Moon 1969 = american "truth "about biological weapon in Iraque 2003.America creates its own "truth"🤣🤣🤣
The three
Apollo
Twelve astronauts were
Charles
Conrad,
Jr.,
Alan
Bean and
Richard
Gordon,
Jr.
Just look at the relentless determination in those engineer's eyes. Who could ever think these missions were faked are disbelievers of their own hearts
I think you make a great point . . .
I like this mission because it went to the Surveyor. That is very cool.
Ah yes. The days when Jim Lovell was aboard Apollo 12.
rsvp9146 so it wasn’t just me .
Yes!!! look a little closer and you will also see Jack Swigert and Fred Haise too /. Wow !! I do not know how they got on Apollo12 and then did Apollo 13 afterward?LOL!!!!!
We should go back to The Moon! It would be awesome, especially with our technology now! I'd love to see the other Apollo Missions on this channel! I love Spacerip!
artemis
@@danzstuff LOL 🤣😂
I’d go back in a nanosecond but unfortunately all the information was destroyed and now we can’t go back. After a statement like this made by nasa. I stopped believing this ever happened
ONE GUY WAS LEFT ON THE MOON TO COVER THE MODULE TAKE OFF.
Brilliant, that made my night.
Chris so that’s how they got that video I hope he is doing ok by himself
Correction: The person who came up with the SEC to AUX solution wasn't Bean but The Electrical, Environmental and Consumables Manager (EECOM) in Mission Control, John Aaron, for which he got called the Steely-Eyed Missile Man. CAPCOM relayed the info to Bean.
"Man we come a LONG way!" damn hew sounded just like my grandpa lmao
We come a long way. Went to the moon in 1969. But cant get past lower earth orbit in 2021. That's like upgrading from a Lexus to the horse carriage. Made a phone call to president from the moon meanwhile I cant get a signal behind food basic. I guess phones were better in 1969. This space nonsense is beyond ridiculous. But the masses are buying it. So why not.
Yeah we did come a long way. NASA still cant say if you can see stars in space. They look at eachother to see what next clown is going to say. But if the technology wasnt lost , they would go back in a nano second. There words not mine. Dont hate the messenger. Because the message is a pile of crap.
@@00tonytone The hero worshippers are starting to die off...
The television watchers are getting old too....
Soon there will be nobody left to believe this rubbish.....
Everything is sticky-poo.... legends.
I still get chills of excitement thinking about all that was overcome to make Apollo a success and what they achieved
Agreed . . .
good work hoollywood studio :))))
People are so set on going to Mars that we have forgotten about the Moon. We should set up station on the Moon to build mission equipment and make it like a place people could visit..
Well we would have to succesfully get to the moon in the first place
N` chan you are about 50 years late
ron marninks how can you go somewhere where you have never been lol th-cam.com/video/jwpWmkG9JbA/w-d-xo.html
The moon is to close. We have telescopes and cameras that can now see who ever is up there and since we have never been there we have to go someplace further away where nothing can be seen.
What’s going on with the steerable S band antenna at 20:07?
nothing real
"He made every beautiful and hide enternity in hearts of Men but he did not tell it either from beging or ending of it" respect GOD (the planer)
Bet you got that terrific home schooling because mommies religion could not stand reality.
Amen
After looking at the release date I was surprised that the videos are 10 years old. No comment for 2 years.
This quarintaine makes me to listen this vedios and universe was amazing and I not even blink my eye's when I am listening to this and I felt in love with this universe and there are many things to know 🙂☺️
3.42: Lovell and Swigert of Apollo 13. Allways funny to see footage of several missions in these documentaries.
I wonder how they got in and out of their space suits and where they stored them. I also wonder how the lunar lander lifted off after seeing the Saturn 5 lift off.
Easy....didn't happen.
@toddklansta - ride ride ride the democrat klan DONKEY
@@toddlipira8726 Only in your feeble mind
@@toddlipira8726 liar
12:29 Reminds me of the grainy low res photos of the early 1990s Internet.
3:30 is footage from Apollo 13 (Lowell and Swigert)
Yes, Right I can see the Patch is Apollo 13, not 12.
Perhaps the greatest movie was filmed from inside the LEM simulator. Bravo and well done!
I would have appreciated an extended capture of the earth from about 60,000 miles out.
Oh well, they were too busy or the last camera they had was also destroyed from pointing it into the sun.
you can't take picture of the entire earth from outside the photoshop.
We have crap all over the solar system, but photoshop is the only place from where you can see the full earth... that's why the only 2 pictures of the full earth are composites
@@andreib2148 There are loads of photos of the earth from Apollo 11 during the translunar coast. Look at magazine 36, stacks of photos from close in to far out.
I remember an interview once when Alan bean was asked about the van Alan belt and going through it. He said he didn't think they traveled though it. Interviewer said you would have had to, once out and once back. He said "yup then we went right on though it".
Bean's answer is unsurprising, given the massive amount of stuff he and the other astronauts had to learn and be aware of during the missions. Recall that James Van Allen, for whom the belts are named, was a _consultant_ for the Apollo project. The Apollo craft were able to quickly pass through the belts (like twenty minutes) in relative safety, and did so having drawn on the expertise and input of Mr Van Allen himself. The challenge (solved in 2014) for the Orion spacecraft was how to protect its sensitive electronics and crew from the belts in a much different situation than what Apollo confronted: rather than pass through the weakest parts quickly, Orion will be hanging out for longer periods in stronger areas of the belts.
I think Mr. Allan Bean not so intelligent as Mr. Beans, thought Van Allen Belt was a branded leather Belt.
Still don't understand how the Eagle had enough fuel to dock back with Columbia.
Only about 1/6th normal gravity on the moon and no air resistance due to lack of atmosphere... not a lot of thrust is needed to get off the moon.
You have to achieve a speed of 11.2 km/s to escape the earth's gravitational pull, but you only need to get to 2.38 km/s to get off the moon.
@@Cliffmchrist only seconds of fuel left after the manual landing, and they managed to get back into a stable orbit. Unless they already had another stage ready for ascent, that flight getting back up into orbit must've been so intense.
@@northuniverse you've misunderstood. When the astronauts are saying "30 seconds" of feul remaining, that doesn't mean that's the remaining time the engine can burn, that's the remaining time before they start dipping into the feul needed to reach escape speeds from landing. Basicly, if they had gone 32 seconds past that, they'd still have feul left, but they'd have to abort or they wouldn't have enough left to get off the surface.
@@Cliffmchrist okay that makes a lot more sense, the way it was described made me think they were almost out after finding a different spot to land.
@@northuniverse Nasa was pretty generous with feul for apollo, if you look at the A11 Apollo Experience Report: Mission Planning for Lunar Module Ascent and Descent (Page 18, I'll try to link it in another post in a moment), you can see they added tons of extra fuel incase every concevible problem happened at once, and still left 300 pounds of extra feul incase something ELSE they hadn't predicted happened.
At 20:06 they are talking about the craft ascending but it is footage of the craft as it descended to the lunar surface!! The descent stage was NOT still attached to the ascent stage during lift off. The ascent engine exhaust would be hitting the descent stage. BIG error. Surely someone understood what actually happened. You can see the legs of the lander at; 19:58
Haha I caught that too. I was like, wait, didn't the Apollo 12 guys know they were supposed to leave the descent stage on the surface? But yeah kinda difficult to use the ascending engine with the descent stage in the way, and the descent stage certainly didn't have enough fuel to get the whole craft back up to the CSM xD.
SpaceRip SCREWED UP THERE !
21:05 onwards....When it hit the surface the crash landing "Rang like a bell" for over 1/2 an hour.....why..?.....30 minutes of shockwaves....??...OMG.....
OMG ocw.mit.edu/courses/science-technology-and-society/sts-471j-engineering-apollo-the-moon-project-as-a-complex-system-spring-2007/
I love this announcers voice! when I hear it I watch!
Now you would have thought that NASA would have had SLS ready years ago but no, it's all been tested and not even assembled
Not to mention the price
i'm always amazed at the gullibility of people.
@Bob Dillahunty ,,all this bubbling praise for scientists and engineers, do you bend over for these guys Bobby?
@Bob Dillahunty ,,,are you a moaner Bobby? ,,,ofcourse you are, and you love playing dress ups in yr pink spacesuit, i just bet you are the fave with all the engineers
@John Doe ,,,,you right on the money there, he will drop the soap for you if you are an engineer
@Bob Dillahunty ,,do you take your teeth out for scientists Bobby?
@Bob Dillahunty ...is it true Bobby, about you taking out your teeth?
They should probably do their home work next time before doing a doc lol
Great Returning from Moon to Ert...! I think it was impossible to returned by this Rocket....
Which rocket?
@Ronan Barthon its not important if he writes it right guys....he asks the right thing....deal with it...if you see the footage of apollo flying from moon back to earth i reminds me of FLASH GORDON....and who the fuck filmed this move,did someone stay on the moon to film apollo flying back to earth....come on....sry
congrats for a perfect landing on the moon....
20:10 bottom right hand corner, flimsy model broke...oops.
20:02 ,...serious and scientific voice" There were still more science todo do".... and then 20:10 the antenna shakes,..fake
@@lespaul78alejandro55 =) you know whats up & nice guitar! =)
@@leftynero thanks.. greetings from PatagoniabArgentina.
It's obvious that antenna was mechanized and it reached it's max angle, thus shaking.
3:38 This is the crew of Apollo 13 (Jim Lovell and Jack Swigert), not Apollo 12.
Yes!!!! you are right But you forgot Fred Haise he was there too LOL!!!
@@RGJubilee Not in that scene he wasn't.
15:51 looks so fake, like in a studio. Where's all the wilderness scene on moon? Is it because you can fit that in the studio?
Иван Кузнецов: When do you plan on finishing grade 1.
@Иван Кузнецов The rover mission can easily leave a mirrored pod, you idxxt!
@Иван Кузнецов That's like saying, I'm American and therefore it is real. Real stupxd statement. This is not science.
@@CrazyCandyCrush Quote: "That's like saying, I'm American and therefore it is real. Real stupxd statement. This is not science." No proof that is a real persona either, anybody can make up a fake persona for trolling. The "thinking" and "insults" being expressed are not very European or Russian.
@MrTheredpill05 Lmao what do you mean that hegelian dialectics is a threat made to the people? hegelian dialectics is literally a method of analyzing history.
Traveling to space and discovering the other distinations are part of my mission in life.
minute 6:50 it lands on the moon but the ground is undisturbed
@MrTheredpill05 No it didn't!! Give me a link to photos that prove there were no tracks
@MrTheredpill05 there are over 8,000 different photos of our trips in space you wacko. there's plenty of evidence we went to the moon, and even if we didn't go to the moon, it's not like it means the end of the world.
@MrTheredpill05 100,000 rads??? YOUR articles say the astronauts were exposed to 200 rads at MAXIMUM, less than a CT scan. *"Astronauts are exposed to ionizing radiation with effective doses in the range from 50 to 2,000 mSv."* 2,000 mSv = 200 rads. Besides, how do you explain the 400,000 people that worked on the Apollo mission? Would you really expect half a million people to keep their mouth shut? Not to mention it would cost more to fake the entire ordeal than it would be to actually go to the moon. It takes more faith to believe in your theory than it does that they actually went to the moon.
@MrTheredpill05 Of course it is dangerous. Many astronauts had health problems due to the radiation they were exposed to in space, some even died of cancer. Not only is your belief insane, it is also disrespectful to people that died trying to achieve the goal, it is also a massive put down to the effort of hundreds of thousands of talented people. There is no way half a million people would get brainwashed, like i said before, it takes more faith to believe that than it does astronauts actually reached the moon.
@MrTheredpill05 I used the word faith to describe the miniscule possibility that somehow the U.S. created a massive vacuum chamber, and brainwashed hundreds of thousands of people, and all of them lied about the entire ordeal. That's what you believe isn't it? Like HOW, what idiot could possibly think half a million people could NEVER say anything about faking the moon landing? Over 400,000 people. It might as well be religious insanity.
Back when America could do great things...we are now a different nation without knowing how it happened..
I know how it happened.; Think Democratz.
+Ray Carpenter yes, Democrats are responsible for the moon landing, good point.
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY VIEWS WERE CONSERVATIVE IN THOSE DAYS & VICE VERSA.... LOOK HARRRRRDERRRR... ;)
Yep...political parties are not even needed. As useless as the electoral vote system.
pipercub123456
its fake, nothing happened.
Stellar achievement! Glad I was alive during the space race. You deniers should be pitied because you weren't alive at the time.
Get informed. Waken up.
Even if you send a rocket to the moon there’s people who will Dislike that . Believe in what you do and live a happy life . So the people can remember you whit gut thought
Has anyone noticed this doc used Apollo 13 footage? I read back but I'm not reading everything.
if you want to see some real fake stuff, look at some of the Apollo 1-9 footage, super fake stars, the moon is so incredibly fake... at least the studio model of the moon for all the orbital shots was improved for Apollo 11
@@aaronrus Have you noticed how fake FLORIDA is!! Like it's even a state, how could a peninsula be that big and not get washed away in the first hurricane. Ridiculous.
I noticed it to, and you're correct. Two years before the Ron Howard movie Apollo 13, PBS made a one hour special of that mission and that same footage is in that documentary.
Maybe is an omen: th-cam.com/video/3di6odvdNZk/w-d-xo.html
That's the thing, most who watch this already are believers, so they don't need convincing.
It's only the ones who research it who will notice these anomalies.
If they only had 30 seconds of fuel left beofre landing . how did they lift off again to "return" to "earth" where did they store that fuel and how much can that cardboard box hold? About a litre ?
Hollywood magic, the ascent module was probably hauled up towards the studio ceiling by a wire.
Navigation without satellite navigation type aids was utterly amazing for Apollo 12 to find the old, dead, Surveyor 3 spacecraft. So "incredible" (unbelievable) is the correct word to use. As was the alleged rendezvous of the ascent stage with the command module in lunar orbit, above the lethally radioactive moon, in lethally radioactive deep space. *"Radioactive Moon | Science Mission Directorate - Science@NASA"*
@1manuscriptman The base was allegedly to be left behind, but I think it was reportedly the same main lift rocket to be used for landing this inherently unstable looking and completely untested for vertical landing and vertical takeoff contraption. It seems as though NASA likes testing their VTOL contraptions, for the first time, on highly radioactive moons where if anything goes wrong at all with the contraption, their astronauts will end up dead, or stranded, with zero hope of rescue, live on TV. "Go tell it to the Marines" because others won't believe it!
They got help from Mr spoon
I came here with same question.. how can they return in that box. How can they fly with that with such lesser fuel.
The title covers this clip just well: it is indeed incredible.
The Incredible Journey to discovery to the Moon and we all proud about our Nation America !
An Engineer's Holiday
Only NASA can spend billions to build a backyard foil covered overgrown mousetrap that was the worst possible design as a pressure vessel. Pressure at 5 psi is cumulative over hundreds of square inches that translates into thousands of pounds of force, much of which is concentrated at stress points inherent in the flat aluminum foil sheet over angular framework. If this was legitimate, a true pressure vessel would have been constructed, while using a light weight high strength material like titanium for a degree of safety. This was an engineer's holiday and no one seems to need the time of day from an appropriate professional to evaluate the complete lack of design for the intended use of this device.
It was also inherently unstable and needed to be balanced perfectly, but they later bolted a 120kg LRV on one side....
Talking of building things the wrong shape - the conical CM s totally wrong too: the Soyuz uses the obvious shapes of sphere and cylinder instead of a cramped tepee.
@@G-ra-ha-m LM directional thrusters located above the centre of gravity, on an untested to be fit for purpose VTOL machine, balanced precariously on just one down-thruster, an alleged rocket motor that could be throttled? What could possibly go wrong! Catherine Wheel firework spin out? "Incredible Journey" is quite accurate, I don't believe it!
@MrTheredpill05 Yup - 50 years later and they still take years to get it right, yet in the 1960 rush it all worked perfectly, every time, even untested stuff left sitting on the moon for 3 days LOL.
he said it right at the end...
"Its absolutely UN- REAL."
Quite right, because if those Yanks had been truely on the moon then they would have said nothing except 'Oh, mah gawd! Oh, mah gawd!'
At 9:02 , someone take the picture before they land, there must be some camera man get there first and take the good spot for perfect photo shooting. :-)
@Origami Mambo Project And your IQ is 56? Its called getting an education .Don't be stupid, you will someday produce children? We don't need any more ignorance in the world.ocw.mit.edu/courses/science-technology-and-society/sts-471j-engineering-apollo-the-moon-project-as-a-complex-system-spring-2007/
@@thomaslewis7883 saying that automatically makes you wrong AND ignorant...
@@felobatirmoheb4884 It doesn't take much effort to separate science fact from science fiction. Try it. Just once except mainstream educations explanation regarding the historical as well as the science and engineering of Apollo. Conparicists are indirectly saying "the world's scientists, engineers, professors are pathological liars. Humans walked on the Moon.
Fantastic!!