Thank you sir, it took our professor 4 sessions to explain these methods, that means 8 hours, now here you can understand in 20 minutes the three methods. Great job.
+Khaoula Daghsen i swear that here in algeria we still have a luck on information and after 3 years of teaching that course the teacher can't explain well this course and the students still suffer so it took the whole semester and we can't understand
Thank you Mr Waterman! You seriously have helped me so much! I have been struggling on this for a little while and compared to the other 1000's of videos i have watched, you have simply put it together! Many thanks!
Thank you! It only took 6 minutes for me to understand this. Our professor needed atleast 2 meetings=6 hours of lecture for him to fully discuss but still I can't understand a thing.
This system can be solved exactly by elimination, or by row-reducing the augmented matrix. A system encountered in "real life" would likely not have an integer solution!
just go on with your iterations until you're REALLY close to the actual value or if your Relative Percent Error and Approximate Percent Error hits 0.00N%
So do I have to solve the equation in gauss elimination method first in order to to find the actual value and then proceed for gauss seidal method like you showed ??
Gonkee is correct. I didn't want to get into that because I wanted to keep the video short and focused on the technique itself. Fortunately, the matrix for systems that arise in actual engineering situations ARE diagonally dominant.
Thank you professor for the demonstration and I have a query in places where my analytical solutions or values of X are unknown so, how could I firmly assume that after a particular iteration these are my fitting values. do I compare my values with the previous iteration up to an accuracy of 3 digits or so to fix that these are the values required?. Please resolve this. Regards
![[ ออกกอง ] วัยหนุ่ม 2544 โลกหลังลูกกรง..ทัวร์กองถ่ายหนังใน "คุกของจริง" | JUSTดูIT.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vB--aOkZCpw/mqdefault.jpg)
6 years later and still saving student lives... thank you!
make it 7
You comment is a middle finger to Study pug
@@tifo13nightfury70 make it 8
8 years later and still saving a profesional's life because who remembers engineering school anyway
getting close to 9 and still saving lives
Thank you sir, it took our professor 4 sessions to explain these methods, that means 8 hours, now here you can understand in 20 minutes the three methods. Great job.
+TheMaster-Y the same case here but me, after wasting all this time i didn't undrestand from my professor :p ;)
+Khaoula Daghsen i swear that here in algeria we still have a luck on information and after 3 years of teaching that course the teacher can't explain well this course and the students still suffer so it took the whole semester and we can't understand
hamza mizou kcheftna
the amzing thing here is that the example was mentioned in the last exam Nour Nounou
hamza mizou Haha hopefully it happens to me too
8 years later and you still saved me a lot of confusion 🥰
This is amazing. I have an exam today and i never understood this till i came here. You are my hero.
I watched the jacobi and gauss_seidel methods at 1.75 speed and understood eveything because the explanation was very clear. Thanks
7 years later and still saving students’ lives, thank you
Also, thank you, 4 hours of lectures into less than 15 minutes of very clear explanation through example!
Thanks alot from Czechia 10 years later.
Straight to the point and easy to understand. Thanks so much man.🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
10 years later and I'm trying to cram before my exams tomorrow. this just explained what my lecturer took a whole semester not to.
Literally in the same situation, my exam is 8 Hours from now.
This video helped a lot
Lol!!! Searching for help for numerical methods on youtube, and math professor pops up. Not bad, Gregg Waterman, not bad . totally subscribed ;)
is he your professor?
Don't know if you see this, but thank you for your thorough explanation!
7 years later and still saving student lives，Thank You
THANK YOU
You did it in 6 minutes while others couldn't in 3 hours (2*1.5h)
crazy how 8 years later this is better than uni lectures
Thank you Mr Waterman! You seriously have helped me so much! I have been struggling on this for a little while and compared to the other 1000's of videos i have watched, you have simply put it together!
Many thanks!
This is the more than perfect video for the given topics, thank you, sir.
Allah senden razı olsun ya valla iyi geldi
Hello sir. I hope you are well. Thank you so much for your uploads, they still help us to this day!😊
You summed up 2 hours worth of college lectures in 12 minutes. You sir should be getting my tuition money, not the professors lol.
the bestEST explication !!
thank you so much
très bien expliqué, merci Monsieur
learning this 2 hours before my numerical paper
thank you
first in this sem
6 min is equal to 4marks
thankyou sir...
history repeated bro. i also got 4 marks in m minor marks
We need teacher like this. 💝
Thanks very much! Gonna be a big help as i missed my lecture on this and its easy to understand straight away
9 years later and still saving students lives
10 yrs later still saving students bravo😢
This helped a lot! I'm indebted to your videos
9 years later and you saved me
Thanks Gregg! These are some brilliant tutorials.
simple fast effificant
I have no ideal why our lecturer needs two hours to explain that
Your lession is so useful
Thank you! It only took 6 minutes for me to understand this. Our professor needed atleast 2 meetings=6 hours of lecture for him to fully discuss but still I can't understand a thing.
It's so easy thanks to the way you explain it, thanks alot!
How does one know of the actual values? How did you find the actual values for this case to be (1,-3,2)?
This system can be solved exactly by elimination, or by row-reducing the augmented matrix. A system encountered in "real life" would likely not have an integer solution!
@@watermanOIT or just use a calculator?😄
English isn't my native but I understood this method better then it is explained in my book...
simple and best explanation
Thank you so much sir,you save my life
Amazing, you make it so simple, thank you so much!
Thanks, much better than in lections, i've understood it eventually
Lecture is great!!! Nice explanation but needs to improve the audio quality. Thank you
Excellent explanation sir
when should i stop the steps ?.. when it is closer to the actual number ?..
How does one know of the actual values? How did you find the actual values for this case to be (1,-3,2)?
just go on with your iterations until you're REALLY close to the actual value or if your Relative Percent Error and Approximate Percent Error hits 0.00N%
Use elimination method or substitution method for the given three linear equations.
simple way and understand able...thanks sir g
Dobry przekaz leci, pozdrowienia z Metod Numerycznych na POLSL
Thanks Mr. Waterman
It's always the old videos
Mr Waterman thank you very much
the relaxation method plz .. thank you so much
So do I have to solve the equation in gauss elimination method first in order to to find the actual value and then proceed for gauss seidal method like you showed ??
you are the best hocam. we love you
how can i solve this system with g-s method?
x-2y=5
2x+y=3
The value of x3 in first iteration is incorrect, it should be -0.10625.
Correct me if I am wrong
You taught well👏
answer of x3 is x3= 0.9531 rather than than x3=1.90625
Can you end at the 2nd iteration please?!
very nice explanation
great job..but i didn't understand from where actual values come?
In this case the system can easily be solved by elimination or row reduction of the augmented matrix.
Thank you sir for this simple method
Thank you covid that I can mute my instructor and use these great content on youtube.
Thank u so much, u actually save my life
thank you, it helped me a lot
When do we actually stop the iteration? Because the more i go the more my approximate error fluctuates and the more my numbers go insanely high
Gonkee is correct. I didn't want to get into that because I wanted to keep the video short and focused on the technique itself. Fortunately, the matrix for systems that arise in actual engineering situations ARE diagonally dominant.
2023 and loved it !❤
I can't thank you enough.
how i calculate the error? i did not understand it
8 years later an- you know the drill
How to go on until convergence closely enough to true value?
Refer to the following tutorial:
th-cam.com/video/IKS7Io6t8fg/w-d-xo.html
Please, tell me when I should stop the steps. When gets closer to 1?
+Raquel Melo whenever you want
Matlab should do the trick
NICE，VERY EASY TO UNDERSTAND~ THANKS
I did it by excel, but my values are getting bigger.. Am I doing right??
his X1 value is wrong its 11/5 not 12/5
You are genius ❤
still saving lives
God bless you sir 🙏
nice explanation
Thank you very much sir ! Merci!!
Thank for this video ❤
Thank you professor for the demonstration and I have a query in places where my analytical solutions or values of X are unknown so, how could I firmly assume that after a particular iteration these are my fitting values. do I compare my values with the previous iteration up to an accuracy of 3 digits or so to fix that these are the values required?. Please resolve this. Regards
thanks you so much, great tutorial
Very clear, thanks
Nice.. you are master
Ok je brat
amazing. Thanks
thank u a lot . I watch this on march 2021 haha
thank you sir, very helpful
Thank you !
amazing!
saving lives rn
Perfect 💥💥
Thank you ❤️
Thank you so much
thank you, so amazing ^^
really great .. thanx
Thankអរគុណ❤
Who's here from 2024?
thank you so much sir
Very Good
thank you wonderful
THANK YOU
Woww thankkk youuuu!!!