Death in Venice (1971) ~ Art & Aschenbach

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @timstill152
    @timstill152 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Aschenbach is so upperclassy here offering him the tea. It seems like Alfred just wants to rip him apart.

    • @Ian24s
      @Ian24s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Had to pour his own milk though

  • @Dert-je5kl
    @Dert-je5kl 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bogarde is such a fascinating man.

    • @Vert-vh2hz
      @Vert-vh2hz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

    • @bred-ib6mj
      @bred-ib6mj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      💙💙💙💙💙💙

    • @David-by2cn
      @David-by2cn 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So true❤

    • @Accji-he7cj
      @Accji-he7cj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      💛💛💛💛💛💛💛

    • @Degu-qu4oc
      @Degu-qu4oc 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😍🥰😍

  • @Fret-gy7nq
    @Fret-gy7nq 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dirk Bogarde ❤❤❤

    • @Bujuj-pt9mq
      @Bujuj-pt9mq 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Handsome daddy.

  • @egapnala65
    @egapnala65 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm guessing this is a paraphrase of the Phaedrus dialogues in the book about the difference between apollonian and dionysian approaches to art and how relying on the purely sensual cannot be spiritual as it leads to passion and a dangerous precipice?

  • @narek323
    @narek323 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    To the extent of my understanding, this is a debate over the meaning of art, and whether it is appropriate to idealism, or realism. Well, if art is something that differs from life in that it is unconstrained, then it is certainly ambiguous and subjective. Thus, I am confused by Aschenbach's latter propositions, because they seem contradicted after he says that reality distracts and degrades.

    • @narek323
      @narek323 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Is the purpose of art to seek meaning in life? Then why try to find the meaning of art itself? That leads to further confusion.

    • @ParchedPinemarten
      @ParchedPinemarten 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@narek323 Aschenbach's proposition on art, beauty, and purity seem to draw parallels with his fascination/attraction to Tadzio. The existence of Tadzio, to Aschenbach, is an example of perfect beauty. He sees no ambiguity in Tadzio's beauty, just pure perfection. That's how I see it anyway.

    • @kingpiye7060
      @kingpiye7060 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ParchedPinemarten
      Yeah the novella is deeper than most people give it credit for.

  • @Darmeliana
    @Darmeliana ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think reality and Art are a very toxic couple. Too close is danger. Too distant is danger Too. Every one send you to destruction if you don't limite them. Both are needled in the life, but you can't love them with out being destroyed. Aschenbach looks like a great gentleman in this scene, with the cup of tea, but at the same time, he is so appasionated with his ideas

  • @The1976spirit
    @The1976spirit 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I´m an old friend of reality.

  • @lizclegg7556
    @lizclegg7556 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think they're both wrong. Is the conversation meant to be pretentious and deluded? The way they go from evil as the food of genius to having tea (help yourself to milk) and then off again on art as ambiguity is quite funny.

    • @Ian24s
      @Ian24s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You got it

    • @egapnala65
      @egapnala65 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think its a paraphrase of a platonic dialogue in the book which argues about whether sensuality can lead to perfect art when it is based on passion and passion leads to a dangerous precipice. Britten's opera explores it in more detail. A conflict between the apollonian and the dionysian.