The judges robbed Ankalaev AND Jared Gordon | UFC 282
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ธ.ค. 2022
- Coach goes over the controversial decisions of the main and co-main event from last saturday at UFC 282 Błachowicz vs Ankalaev.
See the full podcast here: • Say it ain't so, Liver...
Follow Coach on instagram: / firas_zahabi
Find all the martial arts and strength & conditioning training here: www.jujiclub.com/
Use code: HOLIDAY50OFF for 50% off!
Click here to join Tristar Gym Digital: tristargymdigital.com/
The best way to learn the approach to martial art and strong and stable lifestyle that coach Zahabi present is here!
Over 30 videos in library to change your approach to Jiu-jitsu, striking and strength and conditioning.
Plus! Other experts share their martial arts knowledge on the website.
Buy here: Jujiclub.com
Use code: HOLIDAY50OFF for 50% off!
-------
Tristar Gym Digital is now Live!!! You can now train at the Tristar Gym with Coach Zahabi from anywhere in the world. Learn the basics, leg locks, advanced Jiu-Jitsu, wrestling, Striking technics and everything Mixed Martial Arts. This is the most complete martial arts program in the world!
Click here to join Tristar Gym Digital tristargymdigital.com/
*** Use promo code starfromheaven and get 20% off! - กีฬา
they did not rob ankalaev at all
he robbed himself for losing 3 rounds..after Jan beat him standing, Ank wanted to nut hug..
@@jamesroberts7262 anklaev won. Plain and simple.
Ankalaev got his knees destroyed for nothing, thanks to the corrupt judges
in this case i don't see how the ufc benefits, so im not sure about corruption. in the paddy fight it was obvious corruption.
@@diemeatbag Yeah first O'Malley Hype train saved and now Paddy
BS. Jan won 1-3
I’ve seen some pretty controversial judging.. but Gordon absolutely, undeniably won that fight. 💯
Where there's betting there's cheating.
I like how you said interim champ... Because fact of the matter is, Jiri is still the champ regardless of giving up the belt
Three 10-9 for Jan and then a 10-9 for Ank then 10-8 for Ank. DRAW. If you give rd 1 to Ank, which I don’t see, you could even say round 3 was 10-8 for Jan, he couldn’t stand up! Damage was pretty even
we're so lucky to have coach breaking down the best after fight analysis, thank you coach for everything 🙏
yeah it was impressive how Ankalaev made it into the 5th round and win it
He didn't
it's clear draw
The debatable parts of the Ankalaev fight were whether he won round 1 and whether he got a 10-8 in round 5. 2,3,4 were clear
robbed Ankalaev? Comparing that to the Gordon robbery is ridiculous in my humble opinion.. Jan very clearly won Round 2 and 3, and had a case for winning Round 1.
I was never missing ufc events
Im now Slowly becoming comfortable in skipping these ufc cards because of the robberies and boring fights
Same here, I won't be renewing fight pass either.
Are you gonna act like there wasn’t literally 10 finishes in a row tying a record for most finishes in a ufc card of all time and call it boring because you didn’t watch it?
If you had the last two rounds as the first two rounds in the first two rounds is the last two rounds then I think it leaves the impression that the other guy won
Ankelaev didn’t get robbed. It was a close fight. Gordon got robbed.
Ur on pcp
Even Jan said give the belt to Ankalaev after he said he wasn’t sure watch it
When your opponent says you won, you got robbed.
@@person81045 Yes, because fighters have a great history of knowing who is winning the fight during the fight.
Did you watch the fight? Did you see what Jan said on Twitter after he saw the fight replay? I seriously question your understanding of what a robbery is.
The absolute best analysis ive heard on this fight! Thanks coach!
Started recently to hear you and I like it a lot
🙏
I had Jan winning 3 rounds. The result was fair IMO
I agree that Gordon was robbed, but the Draw for Ankalaev is debatable. He was almost with no legs, and in the later rounds he was in a dominating position, without inflicting significant damage, or close to get a submission.
"without inflicting significant damage"
Did you even watch the fight? He GNP'd the shttt out of him in round 5 he almost finished him.
No damage? Haha post fight interview, Jan is concuss.
@@artefloe7676 Jan was landing some elbows from the bottom.
@@kylelee8685 either way, not an impressive fight for the hype Magomed was getting. Glover or Jiri would give him a tougher match.
@@RogerM88 Yes he landed some elbows, but it still doesn't change the fact that Ankalaev DID inflict significant damage in round 5
The judges absolutely robbed ankalaev from a deserving victory, that was an incredible comeback, he won the first round, then lost the next two rounds due to leg kicks, but in rounds four and five ankalaev showed a mental strength I haven’t seen before it was quite inspiring, he won 3-2 but it’s a shame the judges didn’t coincide
Considering that current UFC rules favor damage per round as the most important factor, there is no chance that Ankalaev won that fight.
You forgot to watch the 5th round bruh.
Nobody arguing about the 2nd and 3rd rounds where he took the damages
But this criteria you stated was not in favor of Jan in rounds 1,4, and 5
The 1st rnd Ankalaev did more damage on the feet there wasn't any grappling. That argument "based on damage" doesn't even come into play here
@Disgruntled Simp Mod I just watched it again u have to be a desperate hater to give jam that when he got jabbed countered and front kicked repeatedly its like usman vs covington 2 how so Many ppl just deluded themselves into thinking Colby won or it was draw when usman so clearly won
Respectfully disagree coach. Draw was a good call. Jan took rounds 1,2,3 (1 was close but Jan got it). Ankalaev decisively took 4 & 5.
Keep in mind Jan is 40 years old and prepared for only 3 rounds prior to Jiri vacating the belt, had the conditions not been changed he was clear winner.
I agree that Jan won rounds 1,2,3. Draw wasn't a bad call. Gordon on the other hand won all three rounds.
You can’t win a fight by leg kicks unless your opponent gives up. Magomed didn’t give up! Instead, he made the adjustment and DOMINATED the last two rounds. Ground and pound + control > leg kicks & Charlie horses.
If he basically destroyed his legs, isn't that strong damage. If that was the face it would be looked at differently.
Except it wasn't a face as it's easy to leg-kick someone and not so easy to head-kick someone. What constitues damage at all? Redness? Hematome? Blood? Cut? Dark skin? If what you are saying is true, then how does a fighter who cannot stand on both of his legs manages to win 3 rounds? If his legs were so severely damaged.
@@yuriboyka7423 except jan left hook in rd 1 caused ibstant damage to ankalaev right eye. Also redness on his midsection and legs, Jan landed the harder kicks
Multiple punches to the head and the fight was nearly stopped is way damaging and more serious than leg kicks.
Jan could hardly speak after the fight. Literally forgot his sentence in the middle of speaking it. Just because he didn't get a cut doesn't take away from the pounding he got on his head. At the end, Ankalaev was standing with both his hands raised and Jan took a minute to stand up. Jan was definitely more damaged. In any case, they're both warriors that went to war for that belt. The decision sucked, Dana's behavior afterwards sucked more.
I think the main event decision was a bit understandable, it's clear jan won rounds 2 and 3 while ankalaev won rounds 4 and 5 , the point of contention is whether or not you give round 1 to jan or ankalaev or if you give ankalaev a 10-8 round . So for me it's either magomed edging it out or a draw
The leg kicks from Jan were devastating. I couldn’t imagine getting slapped like that. However, the ground and pound at the end was undeniable. Great heart and excellent display from both fighters. The look on Jan’s face at the end of the fifth says it all for me. The man was defeated. Sad that the commission has such a hold on sports.
Jan prepared for a 3 rounder which he would have won easy, it was a last minute change to 5 rounds. It’s difficult for an old guy who trained for 3 round to adapt to 5 round without adequate prep. It’s easier for a young guy like ankalev to adapt quick to a 5 round. Jan won 1,2 &3 and did more damage.
@@bijosn very true, didn’t think about that
The winner is determined by the appearance of the face or the rounds won? 3 first rounds for Blachowicz, 4th and 5th for Ankalaev, including the last one by 2 points.
I stopped watching the main event after the third and had Jan 3-0 so wouldn’t consider that match a robbery.
Gordon got robbed 💯
I agree with Jared but Jan was close to finishing him so draw is not as bad as you think
Ankalaev got it easy
Hard disagree on the usage of "robbery" for the Ank vs Jan fight. First round was razor close, could go both ways. With rounds that close there is so many factors that are beyond "competence" that can make a judge give the "wrong" score.
Jared vs Paddy though? That was the first fight I've seen that fits my definition of robbery. Most unforgivable scorecard I've ever seen.
The judges definitely robbed Gordon but the main event decision was alright in my opinion... I had it 1,2,3 Jan and 4,5 Ankalaev with a possible 10-8 in 5.
1 went to Ankelaev. He had more strikes landed and octogon control. The 5th was def a 10-8.
@@xeta180 definitely is a very strong statement, this is the problem with mma fans honestly, they can’t differentiate a close fight that could have gone either way, from a competitive fight, with a decisive victor, they both exist, Ankaliev is a prime example of a close fight, that could have gone either way. However after watching Pimblett Vs Gordon 3 times, Pimblett clearly lost every round and has no argument for a victory.
First round was very clouse, Jan made more damage (right eye of ankalev was hurt) .Round 2,3 for sure Jan, Round 5 -Ankalev 10-8. Draw is a good decision IMO by this scoring system. Ankalev was better fighter that night anyway. Dont blame jugdes blame system.
@@bigschlongdave3771 well said!
@@xeta180 watched it 3 times, rd 1 was Jans. Rd 3 was closer to me but jan had the damage
Idk coach more than often I hate draws but the jan vs ankalaev draw makes sense
There is no way Jan lost 3 rounds. The draw was a robbery. IF the lay and pray method is still scored higher how did O'Malley over Yan? Top 50 performance??? Seriously with all due respect, what match were you watching or thinking of? Not only was Ankalav beaten his entitlement afterwards was disgusting.
His watching as a coach and practitioner. His more credible than you and the judge for sure.
@@kylelee8685 I'm not questioning his credibility, I'm disagreeing with his assessment regardless of either's credibility that's how healthy discussions occur. Of which to that extent you haven't add much to the discussion other than a sly insult.
totally agree. Ank went crying to Kadyrov like a pussy
@@kylelee8685 doesnt matter tbh hes wrong and I like firas
I think Jan had 1-2-3 definitely not a robbery my friend you are incorrect
How Jan won 1st round?
Significant strikes 1st round:
Ankalaev: 19
Jan: 14
Wrong. 1st round for ankalaev.
@@timurjack8773 Jan landed better strikes. They don't just count up the strikes to determine who wins the round.
@@timurjack8773 jan out damaged him for sure
agreed, this channel sucks..
I disagree on the Ankalaev fight. I think jan got robbed no 10-8 rounds jan won1-3 decisively and Ankalaev won 4 and 5 decisively. No 10-8s any round. 48-47 jan is the proper scorecard imo
Bruh Ankalaev was pounding him in are you blind ? He wouldve slept him if there was more time.
Jan would have won if it wasn’t a 10-8 round. So judges thought Jan was winning
The judges also thought that paddy won round 1 that night. The judges are braindead.
Ankalaev won the first round, he landed minimum 4 or 5 significant strikes more than Jan.
The problem with the "Jan was winning" angle is that it assumes the judges know what they are doing. In this case, they didn't.
@@xeta180 Not the same judges
@@timurjack8773 youre reading the stats, watch the fight. I watched it 3 times, jan won rounf 1 for sure. If anything rf 3 was closer but jan had the damage
A fight is not that important, there are far greater injustices in this world.
jared gordon for sure got robbed. At the very least gordon won 2 rds to 1 if not all 3. As for ankalaev vs blachowicz. Looking back a draw is fair BUT a vacant belt fight should never end in a draw. I thought Jan arguably won the first 3 rounds and for sure ankalaev won the last two but the first rd could've gone either way since it was close. Yeah I know fights are scored round by round but I feel the championship rounds should be weighed more imo. Because how can you win a fight getting beat up at the end? Any real fight you lose at the end u lost the fight. Ankalaev gave everything to come back from getting his legs busted up and dug out deep to finish strong. Like what Jan said, he doesnt think he won or lost. Props to him for putting up a great fight but the last two rds he lost clearly. Maybe not a robbery compared to gordon paddy but Ankalaev deserved to be a champ that night the way he finished the final 2 rds.
"Robbed" is a strong word in Ankalaev's case. Gordon yes. Ankalaev Vs Blachowicz was close.
Ankalaev was utterly, categorically won
Incredible knowledge of MMA
Yes insallah
The state if MMA judging can be understood by a simple fact that out of the last 8 rounds of the night, in both these fights. The 3 official judges only agreed on ONE round. Now UFC comes out and gaslights the whole world by saying "you gotta see it again" "it was close"
Hey Firas!
Do you think the 10:9-round-based-system is even apt for MMA?
I mean: I feel that way too often two slightly won rounds unfairly win over one really dominant round.
Also I don't like the "inflicted damage"-approach too much. I think that takedowns (which btw WOULD inflict damage anywhere outside a cage) and control are way underevaluated.
What's your take on that, Coach?
The problem is every round is scored 10-9 unless it's dominant, but that makes no sense in mma. It works in boxing because knockdowns automatically get a point. If knockdowns automatically got a point in mma, and so did takedowns, would be a much better system.
Why should clinching hugging someone on a cage and scrambling a takedown favor over actual damage wich is the point of a fight? Lol this isn't a wrestling match its mma my man
can we get a video on firas's experience on carnivore diet please
What a robbery. Cant believe this crap!
السلام عليكم من مصر
Can you break down Zabit in a video
What’s that brown water that Firas drinks?
1 could go either way, 2 and 3 for Ian, 4 for Magomed, 5 could be 10-8. East to to justify win for either or a draw…not a robbery.
The fact that not all the judges gave ankalev the 5th is all you need to know.
hey brother, i want to mention a different subject here. Can you reach out to Anthony Smith for dawah. I saw in his podcast with Bisping that after his mom's death he is looking into spirituality and asking questions about life n its purpose and he is trying to find it in all places, so since he is already on a quest, its a good time to make dawah, if you or anyone u deem appropriate can reach out to him. JazakAllah
Ankalaev was not robbed. Draw is a fair decision
Jared got hard robbed he won every round, Ankalaev wasn't robbed at all way too close to call robbery and I had money on him.
Fighters should be allowed to sue commissions over bad calls, especially the obvious bad calls like Jared Gordon. Ankalaev's fight was very close. It's either a draw or Ankalaev wins. At least they didn't give it to Blachowicz because nobody saw him winning the fight except for rounds 2 and 3.
Explicit injustice and Russian phobia especially that the co main Paddy got offered a win that nobody saw only in the UFC script
I think the phobia is THAT big as you say it is. There are tons of fans all around the world that don't relate their ethnicity to their heart and martial prowess. He's a good fighter but this, as you look at multiple video's and comments is more of a draw than a steal of a win as it's so heavy split between who won when the middle does infact exist.
He might just have weak knees. Doesn't mean he has done something wrong
they must be the same judges from world cup for the game between Morocco and France. 🤪
Gordon was definitely robbed but Magomed got lucky with the draw after losing three rounds. But Magomed kinda proved he might be the best in the devision
Jan didn't win round 4, round 1 was close, 2 and 3 were Jan he caused a lot more damage and cause Ankalaev to disengage and back away from fighting. 4 was ankalaev but with little damage and round 5 basically caused Jan to give up and arguably 10-8 due to it being very one sided even though damage wasn't high. A draw is fair enough he didn't get robbed, his fault for letting Jan land the kicks and backing away from fighting, if Ankalaev got a draw instead of losing its not a robbery. Jared Gordon was the definition of a robbery.
Kinda in the way Champions get the decisions if it’s somewhat close, so does the bigger draw, in this case Pimblett.
But this wasn't somewhat close, Paddy lost all 3 rounds. It was dirty.
Racist judges
jan ankalaev was a draw at best, jan win at worst. Ankalev landed the better shots rd 1? The left hook Jan lands that stumbles Ankalaev and swells his eye instantly is the best shot of the round. Ankalaev landed some good front kicks but Jans leg kicks and body kicks were harder
He should have taken him down in round 1...
It was draw. Easy decision. Both fought too.
I respectfully think people forget that clean punches should count more than holding a guy against the fight especially to end the fight in a Yawn fest
How the hell did you give round 2 to Gordon?
Magomed didn't get robbed. Lol that fight was a draw
Jan did more damage👍
The main event wasn’t a robbery I scored it a draw, 1-3 was Jan he lost 4-5 and was 10-8 in the 5th so a draw is the right outcome
There's been a lot of attempts to rewrite history over the past week. On fight night, everyone in the bar I watched it in, and everyone online knew that both Gordon and Ankalaev were robbed BADLY! I mean Jan himself even said to give the belt to Ankalaev, and we all agreed! But now people are not only trying to justify the draw, but pretend like Jan actually did enough to win! Smh! Glad to see you still acknowledge the fact that both were robberies!
You all suffer from recency bias and don’t understand how fights are scored. Draw was a fair result. Jan won 3 rounds and did more damage , round 5 was all magomed
@@bijosn I know exactly how fights are scored, I've been involved in the sport both as a competitor and a hardcore fan since 2005, and I know a robbery when I see one. Ankalaev won rounds 1, 4, and 5 for sure, round 5 was easily 10-8, and the only round Jan decisively won was round 2. Ankalaev had over 20 more significant strikes than Jan, over 100 more total strikes, multiple takedowns (Jan had none) and over 11 minutes of control time, again, Jan had none. There's a reason Jan said to give the belt to Ankalaev, because he knows the ass whopping he was on the receiving end of that night, and unlike Paddy, he actually has integrity!
@@bluejay9235 magomads significant strikes came in the last 2 rounds when he was on top. the first 3 rounds were all jan. jan said what he said under duress from rogan. you know nothing. jan won the first 3 rounds and did more damage, magomad won round 4 and 5. Even if 5 was a 10-8. its still a draw. keep crying
@@bijosn Lol, it wasn't just Rogan, Jan was pointing toward Ankalaev before the final scorecard was read, he was as shocked as anyone when his hand was raised! You're ridiculous!
@@bluejay9235 stop making stuff up, he wasn’t shocked when his had got raised…I just went to see the video now.
i disagree, it was a fair draw
When come to Russian athletes usually judges will not favour to them..looked what happened to petr yan now magomed
This is a fan based sport..of course American audiences would be okay with a draw when it comes to Ankalaev but all agree Gordon got robbed.
On fight night everyone (including Jan himself) knew Ankalaev won, but then the Russophobia started kicking in and people are attempting to rewrite history.
Of course he got robbed. He had more total strikes(5/5 rounds) by a wide margin, more sig strikes(4/5 rounds), more takedowns(2 vs 0), more control time(10.5 min vs 0), live betting odds(the most compelling) was heavily tilted towards him, and most of MMA writers had him winning. People who say Jan won 1,2,3 didn't watch it closely or are just parroting what others say. It sucks that Paddy/Gordon decision got more attention than this one.
Watched it 3 times with no commentary. Scored correctly by the criteria round by round, Jan won the first 3 round. Everything you said happened in 4&5 which Ankalaev won, but the 10-8 in th 5th is debatable. Draw was lucky and fair for Ankalaev
Who won is debatable, but I can’t believe Dana said that was a boring fight. Did anyone else think it was very boring?
what surprised me is that one of the judges game rd 5 a 10-9. What does it take to give 10-8 then? Unbelievable.
OooooGaaaaa Booogaaaa Woogaaaa
Ankleav will win it again against the real champ
Paddy fight was a joke…. Ankalaev is more debatable although I thought he won.
The fact that jan's fanbase is shilling and celebrating a draw tells u all about that fight. Everybody talking about damage while not taking into account all the body kicks ankalaev landed or the fact that he outlanded jan in sig strikes, in the first. Even round 3 was very debatable as ankalaev outstruck him and ended the round with takedown. By the end of round 5 jan couldnt get up and had a single digit sig strike round, while getting controlled for virtually whole round. Somehow a guy outlands u 2 to 1 in 3 out of 5 rounds with over 11 mins of control time, and its a draw lol.
My man could not put together a coherent sentence post fight, now thats damage. Other that fan favouritism and/or judges corruption no reason for this to be a draw. Anyone with rudimentary knowledge of mma can see its a robberym, unless they r biased, which is fine too.
Thank you! It's about time I see someone other than myself who sees a case for Ankalaev winning round 3. I mean they act like a couple good leg kicks is all it takes to win a round, but Ankalaev did enough in that round to make it competitive. I only gave Jan round 2.
Please correct your pronunciation. It’s AnkAlaev, not AnkaLev
Russophobic judges
This was be no means a robbery so don't go ruin your reputation by saying so
Yes it was shut up
You don't even have a reputation to make such a statement lmao 🤣
@@muhammadjawwaad3713 then either do you or the other clown that replied
lmao nearly every fighter, coach or knowledgeable media outlet had ankalaev winning. Even jan said he didnt win, it was only after the decision people start shilling for draw. You know u have lost when u and ur fanbase are celebrating a draw.