@@infohound41 Well they're not pedestrianised then are they? They're multi or shared use spaces. Getting a bit fed up with councils trying to dupe residents into voting for something they incorrectly describe.
@@drummerjo571 I think when you say pedestrinaised the point is that there are no motorised vehicles on the street in which case it is totally accurate and eveyone gets what they mean
![เจ็บที่ยังฮัก - ม่อน วรวิทย์ [ Official Mv ] จอนนี่มิวสิค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/KALIGSRSjFs/mqdefault.jpg)
Thinking always on tourist think of the londoners
He's gone too far now, the prick has gone mad with the power. 😡😡😡
Oi / I think this will every body out of business
Since when does pedestrianise mean bicycles? They aren't pedestrians.
They often make pedestrianised streets "shared use spaces" with priority for pedestrians.
@@infohound41 Well they're not pedestrianised then are they? They're multi or shared use spaces. Getting a bit fed up with councils trying to dupe residents into voting for something they incorrectly describe.
@@drummerjo571 London Cycling Campaign are proposing that it is pedestrianised, no buses, no cars, no bikes.
Visit Highbury Corner to see what cyclists think of “pedestrianised” areas.
@@drummerjo571 I think when you say pedestrinaised the point is that there are no motorised vehicles on the street in which case it is totally accurate and eveyone gets what they mean
no cars he sees where the economy is going
Yup. Down the toilet
More insanity these people don't have a clue about how businesses and society work but know how to spend tax payers money