I found myself playing with a brand new demo of this and I had arm issues in the past and always stayed away from anything Babolat. To my surprise from the first hit to the last in the 2 hours I loved it. It felt muted and comfortable. It had a hybrid set up at 50 - 52 pounds. My shots had more spin as I was able to swing this around with more ease than my Yonex Dr. The Yonex has more power but the Aero gave me more shape and I could really get under the ball for more spin. My arm felt good the next day so I am going to pull the trigger on this thing. Good review.
Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience, and glad you enjoyed the review. I find players who struggle with arm discomfort using the Pure Aero often get into trouble when they're using a full poly setup, and they neglect the strings for too long - dead poly can wreak havoc. It's great to hear your hybrid felt good, and it sounds like it performed well. Enjoy the new racquet!
@6:57 as a string breaker, this is what prevents me from wanting to use this racket...I would break strings on this racket way too fast Great review and great details on the pros and cons of this racket. You were very honest!
I’ve had this racket for a while. I’ve had some amazing games with it, but my only problem is I can’t get used to the frame size. I keep on hitting the frame when trying to put a lot of topspin.
I have a 2019 Pure Aero VS version of this racquet. All that you say applies and fortunately no elbow issues for me. Ive been using Solinco tour bite 16 which is another spin string with nice results.
Hey Jon, yet again a very in depth and well made review. I really appreciate the string recommendations which are missing 99% of the time in other reviews. I have one little suggestion regarding your timestamps: AFAIK you can add them directly into the timeline of the video instead of only adding them to the video description which will make navigating your video a lot easier. cheers mate
Hi Phil, Thanks for the note! Glad you enjoyed the review. I'll take another look at that feature. I noticed it when it came out a few months back, but it was an experiment at the time, so it wasn't available to all accounts. Glad you mentioned it. All the best, Jon
Excellent Review. I wanted to buy this racquet, but after watching your review, it pointed out some detriments. My having tennis elbow in the past and rotator cuff surgery six months ago on dominant shoulder. Any other racquets you would suggest for baseliners looking for heavy spin that might be less taxing on the arm and shoulder? Thank you.
Hi there! Glad you enjoyed the review - happy to provide a few recommendations. Here are a few that are worth considering in the order of arm friendliness: - Wilson Clash 100 - Head Graphene 360+ Gravity MP - Head Graphene 360+ Speed MP They're all in the same weight class and have an identical head size and string patterns, but they offer lower stiffness ratings to ward off shock and vibration. If you'd like, you can check out my review of the Wilson Clash here: th-cam.com/video/8EkTNRXLJiU/w-d-xo.html Of the three, the Clash feels the most unique, but it's been a hit with players who suffer from arm issues, so well worth checking out. Both Head racquets are excellent. I'd also encourage you to consider your string selection. Since topspin is a priority, a hybrid string setup would work well and offer a nice blend of comfort and spin. My recommendation would be a softer multifilament in the mains and a polyester in the crosses. If you're interested in diving deeper on this topic, you can check out my guide here: tenniscompanion.org/hybrid-tennis-strings/
Great video. I use this racket, with the same strings and overgrip and find the low volleys very easy. This could be due to me being shorter than you and having great feel and soft touch. I play an All Court Game and have struggle to create topspin so this racquet compliments my style of play well as I can create those short angles while using my excellent volley skills at the net.
Hi Joshua - thanks for taking some time to share your experience with the Pure Aero! It sounds like it's working out well for your style of play. Always great to hear 👌🏼
Such good complete video! Can i make a suggestion, it would be great if you could make so suggestions for 'similar' rackets. For example, a friend who's currently using the aero is considering changing for something with more feel. A little similar rackets section could help. Thanks for the video!
Thanks for the review John! Could you do one of the Babolat Pure Drive or let me know you’re thoughts? Have been using the old Aeropro drive for years and am thinking of making the switch for more power.
Thanks for the suggestion! The Babolat Pure Drive is on my list. If you're looking for more power, then the Babolat Pure Drive is definitely one of the racquets that can help. The Pure Aero has lots of power too, but in that specific category, I give the Pure Drive a leg up.
Thanks, Andrew! Yeah, 300g, as you mentioned, is the quoted weight by Babolat. Of course, they do list 300g (+/-7) on the frame, but it's easy to miss, and websites usually don't reference the range. For most, I don't think it's evident that these thresholds can exist, so hopefully, that's a useful note for some who stop by to watch.
@@TennisCompanion duly noted! Yes, was just working to match a few to a strung spec of around 325sw, 325g, 32.4bal (unstrung 291sw, 303g, 31.6bal) and was running into issues myself of a few out of spec.
Hi Varishith, Thanks for the feedback and question! As a whole, I wouldn't describe the Babolat Pure Aero as a muted racquet. Instead, I'd describe it as crisp and lively. However, compared to the prior generation of the racquet, I do find a few updates give it a slightly more muted feel. These include a small drop in the stiffness or RA rating, and a move of Cortex Pure Feel from the shaft to the three and nine o'clock positions of the head. Hopefully, that helps! All the best, Jon
Great review. Very helpful, Thx. However, to offset the stiffness of this frame what poly strings would you advise ? RPM Blast is a very stiff poly, right ?
Hi Alexandre, Thank you - glad you found it helpful! Yes, Babolat RPM Blast is definitely a stiff polyester. Here are a few that are on the softer side: - Solinco Tour Bite Soft - Luxilon 4G Soft - Volkl Cyclone Tour - Tourna Big Hitter - Dunlop Black Widow In general, an important note on polyester strings is that they do require above average restringing frequency to maintain performance and some degree of comfort. That's doubly true with some of the softer polyesters like those I've mentioned above, so stringing can get expensive. Another route you might consider taking is a hybrid string setup with a poly in the mains and multifilament in the crosses? Have you considered taking that approach? All the best, Jon
One of the most arm friendly frames. But maybe not if u use a stiff dead hitting poly. Super good volleying racket if u know how to volley. Great for doubles for sure. I have shoulder and hand issues and this is one of the few racquets that's comfortable enough .
Does anyone have any good recommendations for the problem he stated about mishitting on the flat serve? Any rackets that’ll be easier on the arm for those mishits?
Hey, great video! What would you recommend for a string if my priorities are slow tension loss and spin? The RPM Blast are great, but as someone who isn't playing tennis every day and restringing all the time, I'm looking for something that won't lose tension as quickly. Thanks.
Thanks, Matthew! Unfortunately, that's one of polyester's biggest pitfalls, but a few do the job better than others. Here a few worth checking out: - Solinco Confidential - Luxilon 4G - Tecnifibre Ice Code - Head Sonic Pro Edge All of those are excellent polys with the ability to maintain tension longer and well worth checking out. I hope that helps!
@@TennisCompanion Thanks, I'll definitely take a look at those! If I were to go for a multifilament alternative to a poly string what would you recommend? Looking for a multifilament that maintains tension well but can still give me some spin. I was checking out the "Head RIP Control" and "Gamma Live Wire Professional" as potential options, but I'm not sure. Again, I'm a fairly casual player who just plays for fun and isn't looking to break the bank. Thanks for the help!
Hey, Matthew. Head RIP Control is a solid option. If you're looking for a few extra with those qualities, here are a few are worth checking out: - Wilson NXT Control - Tecnifibre Multifeel - Tecnifibre NRG2 - Tecnifibre X-One Biphase Categorically as a type of string, multifilaments are better at maintaining tension than polyester, but spin potential and durability drop. I'm not sure if you stumbled across it, but here's a video of mine on the different types of strings that you might find useful too: th-cam.com/video/OflCsTM6y8w/w-d-xo.html Not to complicate things, but you might find value in testing out a hybrid string setup with polyester and multifilament. The string you place in the mains will dominate the overall feel and performance, so if you're looking to maintain spin while improving the life of your strings, then stringing one of those polys in the mains and a multifilament in the crosses would work great too. All the best! Jon
Hi John, Great informative video. You say that you would add a bit extra weight in the upper hoop for more power and stability. I found it to be a bit unstable in during rallies when I see faster heavy balls. Would you suggest 1.5grams each on 3 and 9 ? Or would I rather benefit from 1.5grams on 2 and 10 ? I am planning to replace the factory grip to a Babolat leather one. Which setup among the 2 above would be better for the arm. Thanks again for the video.
@@TennisCompanion Any reviews coming up for a Wilson (especially for the pro 100 clash)? I found your comments on the Babolat spot on, especially regarding the tennis elbow as i found it too top heavy.
@Batdroid oh man, perfect timing on your comment! Yes, the Wilson Clash 100 is next up, and the review will be coming soon. Edit: Didn't realize you mentioned 'Pro' at first, so circling back to confirm it will be the standard Clash 100, but I think you'll be able to glean the information you're looking for from it.
This was a great well paced and thorough video review. Hooe you can give your thoughts on a question. I play recreationally and by no means a pro. I recently bought a Max Drive 110, blue, from a sports store after reading very favorable reviews. I quite enjoy using it. I plan to get another racquet and thought about the Pure Aero. You mentioned the strings needling changing after a while. How long after using it did you have to change it? Would you still recommend the Aero? Can you also share your thoughts on the babolat Rival Pro 100 racquet? I saw this on line and wondered how this faired as a solid reliable racquet. Thank you in advance. Cheers!
Hi Judith - thank you for the kind words! Compared to many other racquets, I find the Babolat Pure Aero's design characteristics that enable more significant string movement to increase sawing of the strings and, subsequently, lead to more string breaks. However, mileage will vary and depend on a variety of factors, including the following, to name a few: - String type and gauge - Grip, i.e., easter, semi-western, western - Racquet head speed - Style of play - Frequency and duration of play I play with a semi-western grip, swing fast, and generate a lot of topspin, which amplifies string movement and leads to more regular string breaks. However, if a player were using an eastern grip and a compact, moderately paced swing, they wouldn't have nearly as many issues. With that said, you do have to consider these factors as they are unique to each player. Still, I'm confident that many players will experience more regular string breaks with this racquet. I recognize you're asking very specifically about the Pure Aero's restringing. However, if you're looking to dive a little deeper into the topic more generally, you might find my video useful: How Often to Restring: th-cam.com/video/ZYGoKSgCRIc/w-d-xo.html As for recommending the Pure Aero, yes, I still recommend this racquet for intermediate to advanced players with an aggressive baseline game looking to generate maximum topspin. It's not for everyone, but it's very well suited for players with that style of play. As for the Babolat Rival Pro 100, it's a decent full-graphite entry-level tennis racquet that's lightweight and well-suited for players that are a beginner to early intermediate. As a result, it won't offer the performance level that players should expect with the Pure Aero, but it's more than sufficient for players who are new to the sport. Compared to the Babolat Drive Max 110, the Babolat Pure Aero is lower powered and will demand more from the player to get the most out of it.
@@TennisCompanion Thank you so much for your response. I just knew that you would reply with in-depth and thorough suggestions and recommendation. :->) Appreciate that. You have given me much to ponder. Leaning towards either the Aero G or the Aero 112 which would be similar to my Drive Max in head circumference. Thanks again for your valuable information. Be safe. Cheers!
I really liked this racket when I tested it, I enjoy the spin and power it provides. But I have suffer about elbow pain and you say it's better to avoid this racket. Which one do you advice to buy that has the same style/concept but won't impact my elbow?
Hey! Appreciate the high quality tennis content! Recently have gotten back into tennis and have binged through all your videos. I’m looking to purchase a new racquet and am debating between a few options: Babolat Pure Aero, Babolat Pure Strike, and Wilson Clash. Would love to get your thoughts on what you think would work best for me. Have demod all three racquets but can’t really decide. I’m in my mid-20s and fairly athletic (similar body type as you, little lighter). I tend to have an all-court game and like to transition to the net. I also play doubles somewhat often. I am hoping to choose a racquet I can grow with as a player, improving at all aspects of the game (though I’m more keen on improving my serve and ground strokes). Appreciate any advice you can give. Thanks in advance!
Hi Anirudh - thanks for the kind words and for stopping by to ask a question. That's an excellent selection of racquets. If you don't mind me asking, what racquet do you currently own or play with, and what do you like/dislike about it? I find that's often a useful point of reference when considering a new frame. When you demoed each racquet, was there anything that stuck out to you or caught you by surprise? All in all, I think each frame can support the growth that you're looking to achieve as a player - it's just a matter of working through some of the details 😄
@@TennisCompanion Thanks for taking the time to reply and asking for more information! I'm currently using an old racquet from middle school, think its a Prince Air-O Storm (107 sq.in. head, 10.5 oz unstrung, 27 in length). Don't think I can pick out anything particular I like/dislike about it, just think it might be beneficial getting a newer racquet. To be honest, haven't played with the racquet in awhile since I've been demoing racquets. In terms of the frames I mentioned, I tended to gravitate to the Pure Aero (demoed the tour model since the standard wasn't available) as it gave the most pop on my serve and returns. Think that might have just been due to the added weight though. I am also worried it might be too early to transition to higher weighted racquets prior to developing technique on my strokes further (likely around the 3.5 level and fairly new to the sport) though I don't believe I experienced fatigue with the extra weight. I have been demoing the Pure Strike 98 16x19 more recently and like the directional control I get with the racquet (first time I played with it I really didn't like it demoing after the Pure Aero tour but may have been because I lost 0-6). Personally am leaning towards getting the Pure Strike vs. Pure Aero (base weight models) but probably more influenced by online review of the racquets than any major differentiation in my demos. If I do go the Pure Strike route, would love you're thoughts on string pattern (16x19 vs. 18x20). I've basically removed the Clash from consideration as I haven't experienced by arm issues in demoing either of the Babolat racquets and think the lower weight may be too light if I end up committing to improving long term. Apologies for the brain dump. Appreciate you taking the time to respond and sharing your thoughts/knowledge. Let me know if there's any other information I can share.
I have strung it with 1.25mm solinco tour bite and noticed a too high lanch angle and bit too much "bite" on the ball. Also on straight hits i could realy feel how the strings are moving which ended in a less feel of control. Do you think stringing the racquet wit a 1.35 mm gauge string can help? Especially in terms of the String movement and to get a more Consistent und reliable response when hitting the ball. The idea is to make the really open string pattern more dense with the thicker strings. Maybe you have already tried this setup?
Hi there! Thanks for the question. If you're struggling with a launch angle that's too high and excess string movement, then my first inclination would be to consider and experiment with an increase in tension. Although gauge is a useful attribute to explore, it will primarily influence durability, spin, and feel, so I wouldn't expect much change regarding the performance characteristics you've described. Beyond that, you may also want to consider exploring other poly as alternatives to Solinco Tour Bite. Here are a few resources I've created if you'd like to explore these topics further: Tension: th-cam.com/video/dNabsAmlLOw/w-d-xo.html Gauge: th-cam.com/video/OolgTCYQH1s/w-d-xo.html Polys: th-cam.com/video/_ot-QQiFDSU/w-d-xo.html
I just purchased new Pure Aero with RPM Blast 16 at 25kg. The frame is vibrating and buzzing a lot with just hitting with hand.. is this normal for this racket / new racket with poly strings? Or is it faulty.. i don't see any cracks.. Its giving me terrible elbow pain after just 1hr of playing..
@TennisCompanion - I really like you channel and how you explain things in detail so that even a beginner can understand. I have a question if you can answer. I am a beginner transforming into intermediate level and planning to buy a better tennis racquet. I am confused between Babolat Pure Drive and Babolat Pure Aero. Can you please guide me which one would be better?
Hi Deepak! Thanks for the kind words and for taking the time to comment. Great question too! In the broader scheme of performance tennis racquets, the Babolat Pure Drive and Pure Aero have many similarities. They're both higher power, spin-friendly racquets that are approachable with 100 in² (645 cm²) head sizes and manageable 10.6 oz (300 g) weight. Between the two, I view the Pure Drive as the more powerful and the Pure Aero as offering greater topspin, which subsequently can translate to a bit more control. Part of what makes the Pure Drive more powerful is that it's a stiffer racquet with a stiffness or RA rating of 71 vs. the Pure Aeros 67. Beyond that, I find the Pure Drive to feel a bit more muted, while the Pure Aero offers a bit more of a crisp feel. These thoughts compare the 2019 Pure Aero to the older Pure Drive, but I'd expect, roughly speaking, those differences to hold up with the new version of the Pure Drive, which releases September 24th. As far as which is better, it's pretty subjective. I realize it's not always possible, but it would be a fun experience for you to gain a feel for each and make a decision. I prefer the Pure Drive for my serve but the Pure Aero for pretty much everything else, so for that reason and my style of play, the Pure Aero is better suited for me. Hopefully, that helps!
TennisCompanion Thanks Jon for such detailed reply. It definitely helps me to somewhat make my decision. Really appreciate your feedback. Best Regards!
TennisCompanion - Hi Jon, Hope you are doing well! I have one more question. For Babolat Pure Aero, I am using RPM Blast. What is your recommended gage and string tension? I am still improving and just an intermediate player. Best Regards!
I think 16 gauge (1.30mm) RPM Blast offers a nice blend between durability and spin. For that string in the Pure Aero, I wouldn't drop below that because they break too quickly for me. As for tension, I strung at 52 lbs (23.6 kg) for this review and think it works well. To help guide your thinking on these two topics, you might find these two videos of mine helpful: Tennis String Tension: An In-Depth Guide th-cam.com/video/dNabsAmlLOw/w-d-xo.html Tennis String Gauge Explained: Guide + Chart th-cam.com/video/OolgTCYQH1s/w-d-xo.html
@@TennisCompanion Thanks for your response. I hope you also discuss on putting more weight on throat or 12, 3 9, to further illustrate the power and control lead tape can do. Thanks a lot.
Absolutely! I keep a list of topic ideas, and racquet customization is on there. Looking forward to getting to it at some point. Now, if only there were more time in the day 😄
Currently, I am using Pure Drive Lite 2015 (270gr unstrung) and really like it. If I am looking for more power and spin from racquet, will Pure Aero Lite (270gr unstrung) be an upgrade?
I use the 2015 pure drive tour it’s fairly heavy but delivers good power and i enjoy it. But maybe take a look at the new pure drives and find a little bit heavier or take a look at the pure strike
I'm wrapping up a new video on the topic of racquet weight, balance, and swingweight, which should be live early tomorrow morning PDT. It won't be quite as scientific as it looks like you're asking, but I hope it provides you with some useful information on the topic.
Hi Andreas - great question! It's tough for me to comment on the next generation of the Pure Aero without knowing what they have planned or experiencing the racquet first hand. I will say that based on the history of their release schedule (roughly every three years) for new models, I wouldn't expect a new Pure Aero until late 2021, which is a bit of a wait. I don't know 100% that this will be the next release time frame, but it seems reasonable to assume. The 2019 model is a great racquet, so I'd be inclined to purchase it and then wait until the next generation proves itself instead of waiting. Of course, I'd encourage you to weigh your own priorities and motives for wanting to upgrade to make a final decision.
@@TennisCompanion thanks for the feedback. I thought there was a new version coming out this month. In blue... Or maybe its just a colour scheme with some minor tweaks
Ahhh, gotcha - you're referring to the Babolat Pure Drive 2020, which will be available for purchase on September 24th. The Pure Drive is the blue racquet, while the Pure Aero is the yellow racquet. These are two different models from Babolat. I'll be getting my hands on the new Pure Drive you're referring to as soon as I can and hope to do a review sooner than later. If you're interested in that racquet, I'd hold out because it's currently available for demo and soon for purchase.
Hi Andreas! No sweat - happy to share the difference 😄 In the broader scheme of performance tennis racquets, the Babolat Pure Drive and Pure Aero have many similarities. They're both higher power, spin-friendly racquets that are approachable with 100 in² (645 cm²) head sizes and manageable 10.6 oz (300 g) weight. Between the two, I view the Pure Drive as the more powerful and the Pure Aero as offering greater topspin, which subsequently can translate to a bit more control. Part of what makes the Pure Drive more powerful is that it's a stiffer racquet with a stiffness or RA rating of 71 vs. the Pure Aero's 67. Beyond that, I find the Pure Drive to feel a bit more muted, while the Pure Aero offers a a crisper feel. Of course, those thoughts are comparing the 2019 Pure Aero to the older Pure Drive, but I'd expect, roughly speaking, those differences to hold up with the new model releasing shortly. Hopefully, that helps! Thanks again for taking the time to comment.
I also have another question there is a babalot jr 26 which has all the same things as a pure aero but only costs 100 dollars to buy so can you review it and tell me what is the differnce or if it is a hidden jackpot
Hi Varshith, There are visual and tech similarities between the Pure Aero and the Pure Aero Jr. 26, however, a few key distinctions differentiate them. First, the Pure Aero is one inch longer than the Pure Aero Jr. 26. Although that doesn't sound like a lot, it's a material difference that provides adults with greater leverage, power, and spin. Also, the Pure Aero is a full graphite tennis racquet, while the Pure Aero Jr. 26 is a graphite composite, which features an aluminum head. As a result, the racquet is 2 oz (57g) lighter, which translates to differences in other specs such as balance, swingweight, etc. Last but not least, the grip sizes for the Pure Aero start at 4 1/8 (size #1) and go up to 4 5/8 (size #5), while the junior version caps out at a smaller 4 1/4 (size #2). For those reasons, I'd recommend the full-size 27-inch Pure Aero for adults considering this racquet, while keeping in mind the variety of models this line offers, i.e., Lite, Team, Tour, VS, and Plus. I hope that helps! All the best, Jon
How do the flat shots feel with this new aero model? Better than in the other models? The model that i like the most, and is the racket i use, is the Original one because is very versatile both in flat shots and top spin shots.
Hi Oscar - I think the latest model does reasonably well in this area, but it's not the racquet's strong suit. It's worth noting that I use a semi-western forehand grip. However, I hit a flatter ball on my backhand and really enjoy how it performs on that wing. More broadly, for players with a more traditional forehand grip, I think the main challenge players struggle to adjust to is the launch angle, which is a bit higher. Plus, it's powerful, which can make it difficult for some players to adapt and control the ball when trying to hit a flat. However, since you're coming from AeroPro Drive, it would be a more natural transition, which I wouldn't worry much about for someone in your shoes. One of the most significant changes will be the racquet's overall feel, which is entirely a personal preference.
Hi Ali - that's a solid selection of tennis racquets. I saw your latest comment on my Wilson Clash 100 review, so linking it here for anyone who wants to see your full notes for added context in the future: th-cam.com/video/8EkTNRXLJiU/w-d-xo.html&lc=UgzOTbcKgdAH4Qmijyt4AaABAg The Head Ti.S6 remains a popular racquet, especially for players who are new to the game, but it can definitely be a culprit for arm discomfort. The issue stems from a few different areas of the racquet's design: *Head Ti.S6 Specs* - Head Size: 115 in² / 742 cm² - String Pattern: 16x19 - Length: 27.75 - Strung Weight: 8.9oz / 252g - Swingweight: 318 - Balance: 8 pts HH - Stiffness: 75 First, it's a stiff racquet with an RA rating of 75, which in itself isn't necessarily a bad thing - it adds power and stability. However, stiffer frames tend to pass more shock and vibration to a player's arm. Many racquets offset stiffness with added weight, which can help absorb the shock and vibration the same way a hammer does. However, the Ti.S6 is feather-light at only 8.9 ounces, and it balances most of the weight toward the head of the racquet - again for power and stability - which means there's little to absorb shock and vibration. The net result can cause arm discomfort over time, especially if you're swinging big. Of course, it doesn't make it a bad racquet, but it seems safe to say you've outgrown it. The Babolat Pure Aero and Pure Drive are both excellent racquets. However, they are on the stiffer end of the spectrum, so based on your comments and your current level of discomfort, the Wilson Clash 100 would be a logical solution to improve comfort. When it comes to comfort, I'd also encourage you to consider the strings you choose. Here are a few of my resources worth exploring on the topic: Types of Strings: th-cam.com/video/OflCsTM6y8w/w-d-xo.html String Tension: th-cam.com/video/dNabsAmlLOw/w-d-xo.html Hybrid Stringing: tenniscompanion.org/hybrid-tennis-strings/ Best of luck - I hope my notes help point you in the right direction!
@@TennisCompanion thanks alot. But I hope class 100 doesnt dissappoint me on power and spin as well. Besides, if i tell you to choose one, which one would you choose. pure drive 2021 or pure aero 2019?
Hi Ali - you're welcome! Hopefully, in my review, you were able to get a sense of how the Clash performs. It won't provide the highest level of power or topspin, but it does perform well in both areas. However, keep in mind that a player's technique and racquet head speed will have the most significant impact on power and spin - the racquet and strings merely enhance it. Both the Babolat Pure Aero and Drive are more powerful racquets, and the Pure Aero will offer the most topspin by far. However, they won't provide the same comfort as the Clash, so it's all about tradeoffs. If you're concerned about comfort but don't want to emphasize that characteristic too much, then another alternative would be to go with one of the Babolat frames and carefully select your strings for comfort. The resources I linked in my previous comment would be good starting points to help identify a string setup. Here's another to review: Multifilament Strings: th-cam.com/video/7XN3F0F4ypE/w-d-xo.html My personal favorite between the two Babolat frames is the Pure Aero 2019, which definitely hits the mark for power and spin.
Thanks for the note and sorry to hear that, it's a bummer. I've had some minor issues with the paint chipping on these frames, and it's most noticeable around the grommets and on the rim or fine edge of the head, mainly where it's matte black. Some chipping and scrapes are part of normal wear and tear, and although I do feel like it happens a bit faster on some of the newer models these days, it hasn't been particularly alarming for me. From what I've seen, the newer matte finishes on racquets have been one of the bigger culprits, and it's not just Babolat. Stringers need to be extra cautious, especially when tying knots. Depending on the extent, you might consider getting in touch with the retailer if you're really unhappy about it, especially if they initially strung it. However, they're often strict with paint and returns.
@@TennisCompanion cool, could u compare with Pure Aero? and Head Graphene 360+ Extreme. Seems similar rackets? and if any preference for clay vs hardcourt
you mean the racket rafa himself uses? or the pure aero rafa? pure aero rafa i'm pretty sure is the same as the pure aero 2019, just different color scheme. the racket rafa himself use on the other hand, is the very 1st version of the pure aero line of rackets, painted to look like the newer version. the racket rafa is using is called aeropro drive original, came out in 2004 i think, specially designed for him. and pretty sure he customizes the racket to make it heavier compared to the normal aeropro drive
@@suli_xli depends on your playstyle. if you like to play hitting topspin from the baseline, this will be a good racket. this racket is designed with spin grommets to give you a lot of spin on your shots. but if you often go to the net to volley, or you like hitting flat shots from the baseline, then this racket is not the best choice.
Hello, I have arm issues but was wondering if this racket was ok to use with say a hybrid set up(poly and multi) or even a full bed of synthetic gut or multifilament? thanks!
![Wilson Clash 100 [In-depth Review & Playtest]](/img/n.gif)
Babolat pure drive + 2004, for ever in my heart.
I found myself playing with a brand new demo of this and I had arm issues in the past and always stayed away from anything Babolat.
To my surprise from the first hit to the last in the 2 hours I loved it. It felt muted and comfortable. It had a hybrid set up at 50 - 52 pounds.
My shots had more spin as I was able to swing this around with more ease than my Yonex Dr. The Yonex has more power but the Aero gave
me more shape and I could really get under the ball for more spin. My arm felt good the next day so I am going to pull the trigger on this thing.
Good review.
Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience, and glad you enjoyed the review. I find players who struggle with arm discomfort using the Pure Aero often get into trouble when they're using a full poly setup, and they neglect the strings for too long - dead poly can wreak havoc.
It's great to hear your hybrid felt good, and it sounds like it performed well. Enjoy the new racquet!
Rpm Blast is a super comfy poly . Love it on the aero and i usually love stiff poly string
@6:57 as a string breaker, this is what prevents me from wanting to use this racket...I would break strings on this racket way too fast
Great review and great details on the pros and cons of this racket. You were very honest!
Thank you, Jonathan! Yeah, it's definitely something many players have to compromise with if they're using this frame.
That's some on point analysis ...would love to see more and more reviews on all racquets
Thanks, Anubhav! More racquet reviews to come 😄
i dont know what is more great, the pure aero or this video
Thanks, Ulises! Glad to hear you enjoyed it 👌🏼
Wow your video quality are top notch. Please continue to make more videos.
great review! beautiful strokes dude!
Thank you! Great to hear you liked the review.
You got nice fluid strokes. Nice review.
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it.
Love your honest reviews, pluses and minuses all. That kick serve is great! I wish I could do that.
Great to hear, Brian, and thanks for the kind words! Glad you stopped by to watch a few videos and enjoyed them.
I’ve had this racket for a while. I’ve had some amazing games with it, but my only problem is I can’t get used to the frame size. I keep on hitting the frame when trying to put a lot of topspin.
I have a 2019 Pure Aero VS version of this racquet. All that you say applies and fortunately no elbow issues for me. Ive been using Solinco tour bite 16 which is another spin string with nice results.
Mentioning warnings about tennis elbowed players helped me to choose that racket or pure drive 👏😉 thanks a lot...
Wow, this is called a quality video.
Thank you! I appreciate you taking a moment to share.
Hey Jon, yet again a very in depth and well made review. I really appreciate the string recommendations which are missing 99% of the time in other reviews. I have one little suggestion regarding your timestamps: AFAIK you can add them directly into the timeline of the video instead of only adding them to the video description which will make navigating your video a lot easier. cheers mate
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the note! Glad you enjoyed the review. I'll take another look at that feature. I noticed it when it came out a few months back, but it was an experiment at the time, so it wasn't available to all accounts. Glad you mentioned it.
All the best,
Jon
What a fantastic video. Thank you,
Thank you, Lee! Glad you enjoyed it, and I appreciate you for taking a minute to share.
Great review! Keep it up! It will be cool to have a review of the pure strike!
Thank you for the encouragement and suggestion, Jon! The Pure Strike is on my list 😄
Excellent Review. I wanted to buy this racquet, but after watching your review, it pointed out some detriments. My having tennis elbow in the past and rotator cuff surgery six months ago on dominant shoulder. Any other racquets you would suggest for baseliners looking for heavy spin that might be less taxing on the arm and shoulder? Thank you.
Hi there! Glad you enjoyed the review - happy to provide a few recommendations. Here are a few that are worth considering in the order of arm friendliness:
- Wilson Clash 100
- Head Graphene 360+ Gravity MP
- Head Graphene 360+ Speed MP
They're all in the same weight class and have an identical head size and string patterns, but they offer lower stiffness ratings to ward off shock and vibration. If you'd like, you can check out my review of the Wilson Clash here: th-cam.com/video/8EkTNRXLJiU/w-d-xo.html
Of the three, the Clash feels the most unique, but it's been a hit with players who suffer from arm issues, so well worth checking out. Both Head racquets are excellent.
I'd also encourage you to consider your string selection. Since topspin is a priority, a hybrid string setup would work well and offer a nice blend of comfort and spin. My recommendation would be a softer multifilament in the mains and a polyester in the crosses. If you're interested in diving deeper on this topic, you can check out my guide here:
tenniscompanion.org/hybrid-tennis-strings/
Pro Kennex racquets for people with arm problems
Great video. I use this racket, with the same strings and overgrip and find the low volleys very easy. This could be due to me being shorter than you and having great feel and soft touch. I play an All Court Game and have struggle to create topspin so this racquet compliments my style of play well as I can create those short angles while using my excellent volley skills at the net.
Hi Joshua - thanks for taking some time to share your experience with the Pure Aero! It sounds like it's working out well for your style of play. Always great to hear 👌🏼
you just earn a new subscriber :) keep going it was a good rewiev
Thank you for the encouragement, Tan!
He’s right, this thing is a string burner!
Great review. New sub!
Thank you! I appreciate the support.
Such good complete video! Can i make a suggestion, it would be great if you could make so suggestions for 'similar' rackets. For example, a friend who's currently using the aero is considering changing for something with more feel. A little similar rackets section could help. Thanks for the video!
Love the idea, Bruno - I'll do some thinking about how I might incorporate these types of suggestions in the future. Thanks!
Thanks for the review John! Could you do one of the Babolat Pure Drive or let me know you’re thoughts? Have been using the old Aeropro drive for years and am thinking of making the switch for more power.
Thanks for the suggestion! The Babolat Pure Drive is on my list.
If you're looking for more power, then the Babolat Pure Drive is definitely one of the racquets that can help. The Pure Aero has lots of power too, but in that specific category, I give the Pure Drive a leg up.
great analysis on the babolat
Thanks, Marc! Glad you enjoyed it. Thanks for taking the time to share.
Incredible review!
Keep up the good work!
Thank you for the kind words and encouragement!
This racquet really lacks control IMO. Great spin when you hit it right, but when you need precision shots and serve placement, it really struggles.
Thank you for taking a moment to share your experience!
Agree . This racquet ruined my game
Great review! Specs on this particular Pure Aero are definitely a bit off due to QC--should be closer to 300g unstrung
Thanks, Andrew! Yeah, 300g, as you mentioned, is the quoted weight by Babolat. Of course, they do list 300g (+/-7) on the frame, but it's easy to miss, and websites usually don't reference the range.
For most, I don't think it's evident that these thresholds can exist, so hopefully, that's a useful note for some who stop by to watch.
@@TennisCompanion duly noted! Yes, was just working to match a few to a strung spec of around 325sw, 325g, 32.4bal (unstrung 291sw, 303g, 31.6bal) and was running into issues myself of a few out of spec.
amazing review but is this racquect more muted
Hi Varishith,
Thanks for the feedback and question!
As a whole, I wouldn't describe the Babolat Pure Aero as a muted racquet. Instead, I'd describe it as crisp and lively.
However, compared to the prior generation of the racquet, I do find a few updates give it a slightly more muted feel. These include a small drop in the stiffness or RA rating, and a move of Cortex Pure Feel from the shaft to the three and nine o'clock positions of the head.
Hopefully, that helps!
All the best,
Jon
Great review. Very helpful, Thx. However, to offset the stiffness of this frame what poly strings would you advise ? RPM Blast is a very stiff poly, right ?
Hi Alexandre,
Thank you - glad you found it helpful! Yes, Babolat RPM Blast is definitely a stiff polyester. Here are a few that are on the softer side:
- Solinco Tour Bite Soft
- Luxilon 4G Soft
- Volkl Cyclone Tour
- Tourna Big Hitter
- Dunlop Black Widow
In general, an important note on polyester strings is that they do require above average restringing frequency to maintain performance and some degree of comfort. That's doubly true with some of the softer polyesters like those I've mentioned above, so stringing can get expensive.
Another route you might consider taking is a hybrid string setup with a poly in the mains and multifilament in the crosses? Have you considered taking that approach?
All the best,
Jon
Great. Thx a lot for your help.
One of the most arm friendly frames. But maybe not if u use a stiff dead hitting poly. Super good volleying racket if u know how to volley. Great for doubles for sure. I have shoulder and hand issues and this is one of the few racquets that's comfortable enough .
Great review!!!!! Excelente!!!! Pure aero or pure drive for the baseliner???
Great review! Please make a review on the new Head speed MP 😁
Thank you, Frank! I appreciate the suggestion, the Speed line is definitely on my radar 👌🏼
Does anyone have any good recommendations for the problem he stated about mishitting on the flat serve? Any rackets that’ll be easier on the arm for those mishits?
Could you review the newer versions of babolat
Great video thank you, what kind of adjustments would you recommend to get a more heavy feel at the net ?
Hey, great video! What would you recommend for a string if my priorities are slow tension loss and spin? The RPM Blast are great, but as someone who isn't playing tennis every day and restringing all the time, I'm looking for something that won't lose tension as quickly. Thanks.
Thanks, Matthew! Unfortunately, that's one of polyester's biggest pitfalls, but a few do the job better than others.
Here a few worth checking out:
- Solinco Confidential
- Luxilon 4G
- Tecnifibre Ice Code
- Head Sonic Pro Edge
All of those are excellent polys with the ability to maintain tension longer and well worth checking out. I hope that helps!
@@TennisCompanion Thanks, I'll definitely take a look at those! If I were to go for a multifilament alternative to a poly string what would you recommend? Looking for a multifilament that maintains tension well but can still give me some spin. I was checking out the "Head RIP Control" and "Gamma Live Wire Professional" as potential options, but I'm not sure. Again, I'm a fairly casual player who just plays for fun and isn't looking to break the bank. Thanks for the help!
Hey, Matthew. Head RIP Control is a solid option. If you're looking for a few extra with those qualities, here are a few are worth checking out:
- Wilson NXT Control
- Tecnifibre Multifeel
- Tecnifibre NRG2
- Tecnifibre X-One Biphase
Categorically as a type of string, multifilaments are better at maintaining tension than polyester, but spin potential and durability drop.
I'm not sure if you stumbled across it, but here's a video of mine on the different types of strings that you might find useful too:
th-cam.com/video/OflCsTM6y8w/w-d-xo.html
Not to complicate things, but you might find value in testing out a hybrid string setup with polyester and multifilament.
The string you place in the mains will dominate the overall feel and performance, so if you're looking to maintain spin while improving the life of your strings, then stringing one of those polys in the mains and a multifilament in the crosses would work great too.
All the best!
Jon
Hi John, Great informative video. You say that you would add a bit extra weight in the upper hoop for more power and stability. I found it to be a bit unstable in during rallies when I see faster heavy balls. Would you suggest 1.5grams each on 3 and 9 ? Or would I rather benefit from 1.5grams on 2 and 10 ? I am planning to replace the factory grip to a Babolat leather one. Which setup among the 2 above would be better for the arm. Thanks again for the video.
Very, very helpful review man. Thanks a lot
Awesome to hear - thanks for taking the time to let me know!
@@TennisCompanion Any reviews coming up for a Wilson (especially for the pro 100 clash)? I found your comments on the Babolat spot on, especially regarding the tennis elbow as i found it too top heavy.
@Batdroid oh man, perfect timing on your comment! Yes, the Wilson Clash 100 is next up, and the review will be coming soon.
Edit: Didn't realize you mentioned 'Pro' at first, so circling back to confirm it will be the standard Clash 100, but I think you'll be able to glean the information you're looking for from it.
@@TennisCompanion thank you sir
This was a great well paced and thorough video review. Hooe you can give your thoughts on a question. I play recreationally and by no means a pro. I recently bought a Max Drive 110, blue, from a sports store after reading very favorable reviews. I quite enjoy using it. I plan to get another racquet and thought about the Pure Aero. You mentioned the strings needling changing after a while. How long after using it did you have to change it? Would you still recommend the Aero?
Can you also share your thoughts on the babolat Rival Pro 100 racquet? I saw this on line and wondered how this faired as a solid reliable racquet.
Thank you in advance. Cheers!
Hi Judith - thank you for the kind words! Compared to many other racquets, I find the Babolat Pure Aero's design characteristics that enable more significant string movement to increase sawing of the strings and, subsequently, lead to more string breaks.
However, mileage will vary and depend on a variety of factors, including the following, to name a few:
- String type and gauge
- Grip, i.e., easter, semi-western, western
- Racquet head speed
- Style of play
- Frequency and duration of play
I play with a semi-western grip, swing fast, and generate a lot of topspin, which amplifies string movement and leads to more regular string breaks. However, if a player were using an eastern grip and a compact, moderately paced swing, they wouldn't have nearly as many issues.
With that said, you do have to consider these factors as they are unique to each player. Still, I'm confident that many players will experience more regular string breaks with this racquet.
I recognize you're asking very specifically about the Pure Aero's restringing. However, if you're looking to dive a little deeper into the topic more generally, you might find my video useful:
How Often to Restring: th-cam.com/video/ZYGoKSgCRIc/w-d-xo.html
As for recommending the Pure Aero, yes, I still recommend this racquet for intermediate to advanced players with an aggressive baseline game looking to generate maximum topspin. It's not for everyone, but it's very well suited for players with that style of play.
As for the Babolat Rival Pro 100, it's a decent full-graphite entry-level tennis racquet that's lightweight and well-suited for players that are a beginner to early intermediate. As a result, it won't offer the performance level that players should expect with the Pure Aero, but it's more than sufficient for players who are new to the sport.
Compared to the Babolat Drive Max 110, the Babolat Pure Aero is lower powered and will demand more from the player to get the most out of it.
@@TennisCompanion Thank you so much for your response. I just knew that you would reply with in-depth and thorough suggestions and recommendation. :->) Appreciate that. You have given me much to ponder. Leaning towards either the Aero G or the Aero 112 which would be similar to my Drive Max in head circumference. Thanks again for your valuable information. Be safe. Cheers!
You're welcome, Judith - happy to help out 😄
I really liked this racket when I tested it, I enjoy the spin and power it provides. But I have suffer about elbow pain and you say it's better to avoid this racket. Which one do you advice to buy that has the same style/concept but won't impact my elbow?
Hey! Appreciate the high quality tennis content! Recently have gotten back into tennis and have binged through all your videos.
I’m looking to purchase a new racquet and am debating between a few options: Babolat Pure Aero, Babolat Pure Strike, and Wilson Clash. Would love to get your thoughts on what you think would work best for me. Have demod all three racquets but can’t really decide. I’m in my mid-20s and fairly athletic (similar body type as you, little lighter). I tend to have an all-court game and like to transition to the net. I also play doubles somewhat often. I am hoping to choose a racquet I can grow with as a player, improving at all aspects of the game (though I’m more keen on improving my serve and ground strokes). Appreciate any advice you can give.
Thanks in advance!
Hi Anirudh - thanks for the kind words and for stopping by to ask a question. That's an excellent selection of racquets.
If you don't mind me asking, what racquet do you currently own or play with, and what do you like/dislike about it? I find that's often a useful point of reference when considering a new frame.
When you demoed each racquet, was there anything that stuck out to you or caught you by surprise? All in all, I think each frame can support the growth that you're looking to achieve as a player - it's just a matter of working through some of the details 😄
@@TennisCompanion Thanks for taking the time to reply and asking for more information!
I'm currently using an old racquet from middle school, think its a Prince Air-O Storm (107 sq.in. head, 10.5 oz unstrung, 27 in length). Don't think I can pick out anything particular I like/dislike about it, just think it might be beneficial getting a newer racquet. To be honest, haven't played with the racquet in awhile since I've been demoing racquets.
In terms of the frames I mentioned, I tended to gravitate to the Pure Aero (demoed the tour model since the standard wasn't available) as it gave the most pop on my serve and returns. Think that might have just been due to the added weight though. I am also worried it might be too early to transition to higher weighted racquets prior to developing technique on my strokes further (likely around the 3.5 level and fairly new to the sport) though I don't believe I experienced fatigue with the extra weight. I have been demoing the Pure Strike 98 16x19 more recently and like the directional control I get with the racquet (first time I played with it I really didn't like it demoing after the Pure Aero tour but may have been because I lost 0-6). Personally am leaning towards getting the Pure Strike vs. Pure Aero (base weight models) but probably more influenced by online review of the racquets than any major differentiation in my demos. If I do go the Pure Strike route, would love you're thoughts on string pattern (16x19 vs. 18x20). I've basically removed the Clash from consideration as I haven't experienced by arm issues in demoing either of the Babolat racquets and think the lower weight may be too light if I end up committing to improving long term.
Apologies for the brain dump. Appreciate you taking the time to respond and sharing your thoughts/knowledge. Let me know if there's any other information I can share.
I have strung it with 1.25mm solinco tour bite and noticed a too high lanch angle and bit too much "bite" on the ball. Also on straight hits i could realy feel how the strings are moving which ended in a less feel of control.
Do you think stringing the racquet wit a 1.35 mm gauge string can help? Especially in terms of the String movement and to get a more Consistent und reliable response when hitting the ball.
The idea is to make the really open string pattern more dense with the thicker strings.
Maybe you have already tried this setup?
Hi there! Thanks for the question. If you're struggling with a launch angle that's too high and excess string movement, then my first inclination would be to consider and experiment with an increase in tension.
Although gauge is a useful attribute to explore, it will primarily influence durability, spin, and feel, so I wouldn't expect much change regarding the performance characteristics you've described.
Beyond that, you may also want to consider exploring other poly as alternatives to Solinco Tour Bite. Here are a few resources I've created if you'd like to explore these topics further:
Tension: th-cam.com/video/dNabsAmlLOw/w-d-xo.html
Gauge: th-cam.com/video/OolgTCYQH1s/w-d-xo.html
Polys: th-cam.com/video/_ot-QQiFDSU/w-d-xo.html
Great video. How long did the strings actually last before they broke? How many hours of play?
Hi Jon, Can you suggest an arm friendly racquet along with the type of strings.
I just purchased new Pure Aero with RPM Blast 16 at 25kg. The frame is vibrating and buzzing a lot with just hitting with hand.. is this normal for this racket / new racket with poly strings? Or is it faulty.. i don't see any cracks.. Its giving me terrible elbow pain after just 1hr of playing..
Your backhand is nice
Thank you 🙌🏼
@TennisCompanion - I really like you channel and how you explain things in detail so that even a beginner can understand. I have a question if you can answer. I am a beginner transforming into intermediate level and planning to buy a better tennis racquet. I am confused between Babolat Pure Drive and Babolat Pure Aero. Can you please guide me which one would be better?
Hi Deepak! Thanks for the kind words and for taking the time to comment.
Great question too! In the broader scheme of performance tennis racquets, the Babolat Pure Drive and Pure Aero have many similarities. They're both higher power, spin-friendly racquets that are approachable with 100 in² (645 cm²) head sizes and manageable 10.6 oz (300 g) weight.
Between the two, I view the Pure Drive as the more powerful and the Pure Aero as offering greater topspin, which subsequently can translate to a bit more control. Part of what makes the Pure Drive more powerful is that it's a stiffer racquet with a stiffness or RA rating of 71 vs. the Pure Aeros 67. Beyond that, I find the Pure Drive to feel a bit more muted, while the Pure Aero offers a bit more of a crisp feel.
These thoughts compare the 2019 Pure Aero to the older Pure Drive, but I'd expect, roughly speaking, those differences to hold up with the new version of the Pure Drive, which releases September 24th.
As far as which is better, it's pretty subjective. I realize it's not always possible, but it would be a fun experience for you to gain a feel for each and make a decision. I prefer the Pure Drive for my serve but the Pure Aero for pretty much everything else, so for that reason and my style of play, the Pure Aero is better suited for me.
Hopefully, that helps!
TennisCompanion Thanks Jon for such detailed reply. It definitely helps me to somewhat make my decision. Really appreciate your feedback. Best Regards!
Happy to help! Good luck in your decision making.
TennisCompanion - Hi Jon, Hope you are doing well!
I have one more question. For Babolat Pure Aero, I am using RPM Blast. What is your recommended gage and string tension? I am still improving and just an intermediate player.
Best Regards!
I think 16 gauge (1.30mm) RPM Blast offers a nice blend between durability and spin. For that string in the Pure Aero, I wouldn't drop below that because they break too quickly for me. As for tension, I strung at 52 lbs (23.6 kg) for this review and think it works well.
To help guide your thinking on these two topics, you might find these two videos of mine helpful:
Tennis String Tension: An In-Depth Guide
th-cam.com/video/dNabsAmlLOw/w-d-xo.html
Tennis String Gauge Explained: Guide + Chart
th-cam.com/video/OolgTCYQH1s/w-d-xo.html
What do you think about the heavier "Pure Aero Tour"?
The Stephen Wonderboy Thompson of tennis
great video!
Thanks, Evan! I appreciate you taking a minute to share.
Does the grip size run big when compared to Wilson rackets?
Great vid & helpful
How would you compare pure aero with pure drive standard? Can you sort list the pros and cons?
I hope you can review the Pure Aero Tour
Thanks for the suggestion!
@@TennisCompanion Thanks for your response. I hope you also discuss on putting more weight on throat or 12, 3 9, to further illustrate the power and control lead tape can do. Thanks a lot.
Absolutely! I keep a list of topic ideas, and racquet customization is on there. Looking forward to getting to it at some point. Now, if only there were more time in the day 😄
You ball machine is awesome!
What model is it?
Hi Tom, thanks! It's a Spinfire machine and it's excellent!
What is the strings?
Nice review!
Thank you! The strings are 16 gauge (1.30 mm) Babolat RPM Blast strung at 52 lbs (23.6 kg).
No offense but why would you hold the racket almost in the middle of the shaft?
Currently, I am using Pure Drive Lite 2015 (270gr unstrung) and really like it. If I am looking for more power and spin from racquet, will Pure Aero Lite (270gr unstrung) be an upgrade?
I use the 2015 pure drive tour it’s fairly heavy but delivers good power and i enjoy it. But maybe take a look at the new pure drives and find a little bit heavier or take a look at the pure strike
also make a videoon weight but show the speed difference to show true dfference than just saying ncrease power.
I'm wrapping up a new video on the topic of racquet weight, balance, and swingweight, which should be live early tomorrow morning PDT.
It won't be quite as scientific as it looks like you're asking, but I hope it provides you with some useful information on the topic.
Would you wait for the 2020/21 version or purchase this 2019 racquet at a reduced price?
Hi Andreas - great question! It's tough for me to comment on the next generation of the Pure Aero without knowing what they have planned or experiencing the racquet first hand.
I will say that based on the history of their release schedule (roughly every three years) for new models, I wouldn't expect a new Pure Aero until late 2021, which is a bit of a wait. I don't know 100% that this will be the next release time frame, but it seems reasonable to assume.
The 2019 model is a great racquet, so I'd be inclined to purchase it and then wait until the next generation proves itself instead of waiting. Of course, I'd encourage you to weigh your own priorities and motives for wanting to upgrade to make a final decision.
@@TennisCompanion thanks for the feedback. I thought there was a new version coming out this month. In blue... Or maybe its just a colour scheme with some minor tweaks
Ahhh, gotcha - you're referring to the Babolat Pure Drive 2020, which will be available for purchase on September 24th. The Pure Drive is the blue racquet, while the Pure Aero is the yellow racquet. These are two different models from Babolat.
I'll be getting my hands on the new Pure Drive you're referring to as soon as I can and hope to do a review sooner than later. If you're interested in that racquet, I'd hold out because it's currently available for demo and soon for purchase.
Ahh I see. Well in that case, are you able to tell me the difference between the two? Sorry for being a noob lol
Hi Andreas! No sweat - happy to share the difference 😄
In the broader scheme of performance tennis racquets, the Babolat Pure Drive and Pure Aero have many similarities. They're both higher power, spin-friendly racquets that are approachable with 100 in² (645 cm²) head sizes and manageable 10.6 oz (300 g) weight.
Between the two, I view the Pure Drive as the more powerful and the Pure Aero as offering greater topspin, which subsequently can translate to a bit more control.
Part of what makes the Pure Drive more powerful is that it's a stiffer racquet with a stiffness or RA rating of 71 vs. the Pure Aero's 67. Beyond that, I find the Pure Drive to feel a bit more muted, while the Pure Aero offers a a crisper feel.
Of course, those thoughts are comparing the 2019 Pure Aero to the older Pure Drive, but I'd expect, roughly speaking, those differences to hold up with the new model releasing shortly.
Hopefully, that helps! Thanks again for taking the time to comment.
I also have another question there is a babalot jr 26 which has all the same things as a pure aero but only costs 100 dollars to buy so can you review it and tell me what is the differnce or if it is a hidden jackpot
Hi Varshith,
There are visual and tech similarities between the Pure Aero and the Pure Aero Jr. 26, however, a few key distinctions differentiate them.
First, the Pure Aero is one inch longer than the Pure Aero Jr. 26. Although that doesn't sound like a lot, it's a material difference that provides adults with greater leverage, power, and spin.
Also, the Pure Aero is a full graphite tennis racquet, while the Pure Aero Jr. 26 is a graphite composite, which features an aluminum head. As a result, the racquet is 2 oz (57g) lighter, which translates to differences in other specs such as balance, swingweight, etc.
Last but not least, the grip sizes for the Pure Aero start at 4 1/8 (size #1) and go up to 4 5/8 (size #5), while the junior version caps out at a smaller 4 1/4 (size #2).
For those reasons, I'd recommend the full-size 27-inch Pure Aero for adults considering this racquet, while keeping in mind the variety of models this line offers, i.e., Lite, Team, Tour, VS, and Plus.
I hope that helps!
All the best,
Jon
How do the flat shots feel with this new aero model? Better than in the other models?
The model that i like the most, and is the racket i use, is the Original one because is very versatile both in flat shots and top spin shots.
Hi Oscar - I think the latest model does reasonably well in this area, but it's not the racquet's strong suit. It's worth noting that I use a semi-western forehand grip. However, I hit a flatter ball on my backhand and really enjoy how it performs on that wing.
More broadly, for players with a more traditional forehand grip, I think the main challenge players struggle to adjust to is the launch angle, which is a bit higher. Plus, it's powerful, which can make it difficult for some players to adapt and control the ball when trying to hit a flat.
However, since you're coming from AeroPro Drive, it would be a more natural transition, which I wouldn't worry much about for someone in your shoes. One of the most significant changes will be the racquet's overall feel, which is entirely a personal preference.
Which one to choose. Clash 100 / pure aero / pure drive ?
Hi Ali - that's a solid selection of tennis racquets. I saw your latest comment on my Wilson Clash 100 review, so linking it here for anyone who wants to see your full notes for added context in the future:
th-cam.com/video/8EkTNRXLJiU/w-d-xo.html&lc=UgzOTbcKgdAH4Qmijyt4AaABAg
The Head Ti.S6 remains a popular racquet, especially for players who are new to the game, but it can definitely be a culprit for arm discomfort. The issue stems from a few different areas of the racquet's design:
*Head Ti.S6 Specs*
- Head Size: 115 in² / 742 cm²
- String Pattern: 16x19
- Length: 27.75
- Strung Weight: 8.9oz / 252g
- Swingweight: 318
- Balance: 8 pts HH
- Stiffness: 75
First, it's a stiff racquet with an RA rating of 75, which in itself isn't necessarily a bad thing - it adds power and stability. However, stiffer frames tend to pass more shock and vibration to a player's arm.
Many racquets offset stiffness with added weight, which can help absorb the shock and vibration the same way a hammer does. However, the Ti.S6 is feather-light at only 8.9 ounces, and it balances most of the weight toward the head of the racquet - again for power and stability - which means there's little to absorb shock and vibration.
The net result can cause arm discomfort over time, especially if you're swinging big. Of course, it doesn't make it a bad racquet, but it seems safe to say you've outgrown it.
The Babolat Pure Aero and Pure Drive are both excellent racquets. However, they are on the stiffer end of the spectrum, so based on your comments and your current level of discomfort, the Wilson Clash 100 would be a logical solution to improve comfort.
When it comes to comfort, I'd also encourage you to consider the strings you choose. Here are a few of my resources worth exploring on the topic:
Types of Strings: th-cam.com/video/OflCsTM6y8w/w-d-xo.html
String Tension: th-cam.com/video/dNabsAmlLOw/w-d-xo.html
Hybrid Stringing: tenniscompanion.org/hybrid-tennis-strings/
Best of luck - I hope my notes help point you in the right direction!
@@TennisCompanion thanks alot. But I hope class 100 doesnt dissappoint me on power and spin as well.
Besides, if i tell you to choose one, which one would you choose. pure drive 2021 or pure aero 2019?
Hi Ali - you're welcome! Hopefully, in my review, you were able to get a sense of how the Clash performs. It won't provide the highest level of power or topspin, but it does perform well in both areas.
However, keep in mind that a player's technique and racquet head speed will have the most significant impact on power and spin - the racquet and strings merely enhance it.
Both the Babolat Pure Aero and Drive are more powerful racquets, and the Pure Aero will offer the most topspin by far. However, they won't provide the same comfort as the Clash, so it's all about tradeoffs.
If you're concerned about comfort but don't want to emphasize that characteristic too much, then another alternative would be to go with one of the Babolat frames and carefully select your strings for comfort. The resources I linked in my previous comment would be good starting points to help identify a string setup. Here's another to review:
Multifilament Strings: th-cam.com/video/7XN3F0F4ypE/w-d-xo.html
My personal favorite between the two Babolat frames is the Pure Aero 2019, which definitely hits the mark for power and spin.
can you do rewis for other racquets as well
Absolutely! There are more racquet reviews on the way 😄
Hope you see this comment, how long do you think this racket will last me until I have to get it restrung or regripped
never
I bought this racquet a couple weeks ago. All the paint is already chipping around all the grommet holes. Is this normal for this racquet?
Thanks for the note and sorry to hear that, it's a bummer.
I've had some minor issues with the paint chipping on these frames, and it's most noticeable around the grommets and on the rim or fine edge of the head, mainly where it's matte black.
Some chipping and scrapes are part of normal wear and tear, and although I do feel like it happens a bit faster on some of the newer models these days, it hasn't been particularly alarming for me.
From what I've seen, the newer matte finishes on racquets have been one of the bigger culprits, and it's not just Babolat. Stringers need to be extra cautious, especially when tying knots.
Depending on the extent, you might consider getting in touch with the retailer if you're really unhappy about it, especially if they initially strung it. However, they're often strict with paint and returns.
Pure Strike?? review please
Thanks for the recommendation, Christian! The Pure Strike is on my list 😄
@@TennisCompanion cool, could u compare with Pure Aero? and Head Graphene 360+ Extreme. Seems similar rackets? and if any preference for clay vs hardcourt
I will definitely keep those comparisons in mind.
Is the Rafa racket the same as this, but just in a different colour way.
you mean the racket rafa himself uses? or the pure aero rafa? pure aero rafa i'm pretty sure is the same as the pure aero 2019, just different color scheme. the racket rafa himself use on the other hand, is the very 1st version of the pure aero line of rackets, painted to look like the newer version. the racket rafa is using is called aeropro drive original, came out in 2004 i think, specially designed for him. and pretty sure he customizes the racket to make it heavier compared to the normal aeropro drive
@@kcazzzzz ok, I meant the pure aero Rafa, would you recommend getting it
@@suli_xli depends on your playstyle. if you like to play hitting topspin from the baseline, this will be a good racket. this racket is designed with spin grommets to give you a lot of spin on your shots. but if you often go to the net to volley, or you like hitting flat shots from the baseline, then this racket is not the best choice.
@@kcazzzzz ok
Hello, I have arm issues but was wondering if this racket was ok to use with say a hybrid set up(poly and multi) or even a full bed of synthetic gut or multifilament? thanks!
If you had to choose ONLY ONE RACKET to be the "best" for you, which could it be?
Prince Tour 98 ESP
Funny because I just used it few minutes ago for 30 mins and my arm and elbow pain disappeared after using Wilson blade
Hi there - thanks for sharing! Like you, I don't have any issues with the Babolat Pure Aero's stiffness - it often depends on the player.
👍🏻