ARE YOU PREPARING FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE EXAMS? If you want to surely PASS the Civil Service Examination, our ULTIMATE CIVIL SERVICE EXAMINATION REVIEW is currently at 85% off!!! Pay only P300 instead of P2,000.😱😱😱 What can you expect in this review? ✍Video discussions are well-explained in Taglish for you to better understand the concepts. ✍Lecture notes are summarized, simplified and printable. ✍Techniques are employed to simplify difficult topics and problems. ✍Test Analytics are used to aid you in your review preparation. ✍There are thousands of test questions based on the Actual Civil Service Examination. Plus, you can have your review anytime, anywhere!😱 To enroll, just click the link below:😊 quizzer.thinkerville.net/endorsements.php
The parliament and the House of Representatives are the same, naiba lang ang tawag. Under the parliamentary system mas powerful ang lower house kesa sa upper house and sa lower house manggagaling ang prime minister that's why yung mga proponents ng parliamentary system sa pilipinas gusto tanggalin ang senado if ever maging parliamentary system tayo. Yung mga bansa na merong bicameral parliament like UK, Germany, Japan - ang members ng upper house nila kadalasan parang advisory body lang, ang more powerful na legislative body ay ang lower house. In UK pwedeng i-override ng House of Commons ang decision ng House of Lords. Ano ang main differrence ng presidential system sa parliamentary system? The difference is how the chief executive is elected. Sa presidential system ang chief executive ay presidente while sa parliamentary system ang chief executive ay prime minister. Fixed ang term of office ng presidente pero ang sa prime minister ay hindi. Sa presidential system separate ang boto for the chief executive (president) and yung boto for the members of the legislative body (senate and house). Sa parliamentary system hindi tayo boboto ng chief executive (prime minister), ang tanging iboboto lang natin ay ang members ng legislative body (depende sa nakasaad sa constitution kung bicameral or unicameral). Yung partido na nakakuha ng majority ng seats sa lower house of the legislative body ang magdedecide kung sino ang magiging prime minister from among their members. Yung legislative body din ang pipili ng magiging presidente who will exercise ceremonial duties only. Sa mga bansang may monarkiya like UK, yung Queen (or King as the case may be) nila ang nag-eexercise ng ceremonial duties. Sa madaling salita meron pa din tayong presidente kapag nag-parliamentary system tayo, fixed ang term of office nya pero wala ciang executive power, para lang ciang si Queen Elizabeth na ceremonial lang ang duties. Ang mga duties and responsibilities ng presidente ay "above politics" kumbaga and he/she represents the stability and unity of the Filipinos. Once naging prime minister ang isang miembro ng legislative body pipili cia ng mga cabinet members nya from the members of the legislative body din which means mga kapartido nya. Pero ang prime minister at ang mga kabinete will remain as members of the legislative body which means they will not vacate their seats, unlike sa presidential system na kapag ang isang senador or congressman inappoint ng presidente as cabinet member kailangan nya magresign. Why? kase sa presidential system separate ang executive department sa legislative department. Best example si congressman Mark Villar diba inappoint cia ni duterte as secretary of public works and highways, so nagresign cia as congressman kase hindi pwedeng dual position. Sa parliamentary system hindi porke na-appoint kang cabinet member magreresign ka na as member of the legislative body. To make it simple, kapag nag-parliamentary system tayo ang powers of the government ay mapupunta sa mga congressmen, sila na lang ang iboboto natin at mga local government officials, mawawala na ang botohan for president, vice-president and senators (depende kung ire-retain ang senado kase sa parliamentary system mas powerful ang lower house kesa sa upper house). Ang term of office ng prime minister ay hindi fixed, kapag hindi maganda performance nya anytime pwede ciang tanggalin ng mga kapartido nyang congressmen. Ang position ng prime minister ay pwedeng ihalintulad sa Speaker of the House of Representatives na pwedeng tanggalin anytime. Pero pag natanggal cia as prime minister balik cia sa pagiging ordinary congressman. Kapag hindi magkasundo sa madaming issues ang mga congressmen, the prime minister may send a request to the president of the phillippines to dissolve the legislative body to have an early election of its members. Once the president approves the request magkakaron ng maagang election ang mga congressmen kahit hindi pa tapos ang termino nila. Sa presidential system hindi pwede ang early election, that is not allowed. By the way, kung sa presidential system ang tawag sa miembro ng cabinet ay secretary, sa parliamentary system ang tawag ay minister. Ang bawat secretary ay head of each department while sa parliamentary system bawat minister ay head of each ministry. Example: ang secretary of education ang head ng department of education; sa parliamentary system ang minister of education ang head ng ministry of education. Yung original 1973 constitution ay British-style parliamentary system na unicameral National Assembly ang legislative body (so walang senado) kaso hindi naman natupad kahit kelan ang pure parliamentary system sa Pilipinas. On January 17, 1981 Marcos lifted Martial Law pero isa mga gusto mangyari ni Marcos that time ay maging semi-presidential / semi-parliamentary ang system of government natin kagaya sa France. So nagkaron ng referendum nuong April 7, 1981 para bumoto ang mga Pilipino ng "Yes" or "No" kung payag sila sa proposed amendment. Ciempre nanalo ang "Yes" votes. Yung originally-planned na British-style parliamentary system hindi na kailanman maipatutupad due to the 1981 amendments. The first presidential election under the amended 1973 constitution was held on June 16, 1981 at ciempre si Marcos ang nanalo, he took his oath on June 30, 1981. At that time Assemblyman Cesar Virata became the Prime Minister pero dahil French-style na ang sistema naging head of the Cabinet and alter ego na lang ng presidente ang prime minister, unlike sa originally-planned na British-style parliamentary system wherein the chief executive is the prime minister while the president will only exercise ceremonial duties (since wala naman tayong monarchy so ang president ang magiging parang Queen Elizabeth natin).
I love how you briefly explain each "CONSTITUTION" it's gives me a lot of idea with regards to our constitution. But please, kindly pronounce each word appropriately for us not to heard this too distractive.
Excuse me may I add that in the 1935 Constitution with amendment, the president and vice president had a 4-year term *WITH* reelection, not without. Your diagram mistakenly says it does. Kinly address thhis matter in your description or in the comments to avoid confusion. Thank you!
It’s very informative and concise! I like how you explain each constitution. May I ask if I can use your video as a reference material for my school reporting about the topic? Thank you and God bless😊
Thanks for the good info, i hope for the changing times our 1987 constitution should be updated there are some loopholes and too buggy just imagine some highest post in the govt need only be able to read and write as requirements while the ordinary office worker for a small company with less responsibility need at least college degree as requirement. anyway thanks for the info
@@williamkitsabadoii We must remove 60/40 Policy, Revise our government (From Presidential-Unitary to Federal-Parliamentary), Open-FDI and Remove Economic Restrictions.
@@rainr this was discussed during the deliberations of the commissioners of the 1986 constitutional commission. However, dahil katatapos lang ng EDSA '86 that time very anti-marcos ang atmosphere nuon, so ayaw na nila yung 4 years with one re-election kase ang katwiran nila ayaw na nilang maulit na magkaron uli tayo ng presidente na kapag nakatikim ng re-election ayaw nang umalis sa pwesto.
@@medilynlim5623 Ok sana ang 1987 constitution, may kapalpakan lang sa ibang articles and sections. Yung article for Amendments vague cia kase hindi na-mention na voting separately ang Senate and House unlike sa 1935 constitution na crystal clear walang mako-confuse. Yung National Economy and Patrimony sobrang higpit sa mga foreign investors. Yung gusto ng ibang tao na ibalik ang two-party system hindi yun matutupad kase sa mismong 1987 constitution nakasaad na "a free and open party system shall be allowed to evolve according to the free choice of the people". Yung inggitan at silipan ng mga senators and congressmen sa term limits nila could have been prevented kung ginawang equal sana ang years of service nila; tutal 3 years ang term ng congressmen sana they were allowed to serve for 4 consecutive terms para ang total ay 12 years kagaya sa mga senators na two consecutive 6-year term (12 years). Yung party-list system sana pinattern na lang sa sectoral representation ng 1973 constitution (as amended). Sa party-list system na meron tayo under the 1987 constitution lahat ng tao bumoboto sa party-list kahit hindi naman lahat tayo miembro ng marginalized sector. Ang pinaka-ayoko sa 1987 Constitution ay ginawang discretion ng mga senador and congressmen ang number of sessions nila per year kaya sobrang unproductive nila unlike sa 1935 Constitution na minimum of 100 days ang sessions per year.
Very informative but the year in 9:12 of the video is a mistake. We need to be accurate most importantly because there is a lot of misinformation online 😉
On March 16, 1967, the Senate and the House of Representatives passed a resolution calling for a Constitutional Convention in 1971. Another resolution was passed on June 17, 1969 to amend some sections of the original resolution. On August 24, 1970 President Marcos signed into law Republic Act No. 6132 setting the election for the Delegates of the Constitutional Convention on the second Tuesday of November 1970. On November 10, 1970 nagkaron ng election for the members of the 1971 Constitutional Convention. Ang sistema ng pagboto ng Convention Delegates ay per district kagaya sa pagboto natin ng congressmen, yun nga lang kapag bumoboto tayo ng congressman isa lang per district. Yung number of Delegates per district sa buong Pilipinas basahin mo na lang sa Republic Act No. 6132. Yung mga nanalo sa election na yun ay nag-meet nuong June 1, 1971. Dun nagsimula ang pagdidiscuss nila kung papaano isusulat ang proposed new constitution ng pilipinas. Antagal ng deliberations nila - from June 1, 1971 until November 29, 1972. In January 1973 pinagbotohan ng mga tao sa bawat barangay sa pamamagitan ng taas-kamay kung sang-ayon sila (Yes vote) or hindi sang-ayon (No vote) sa proposed new constitution. On January 17, 1973 Marcos issued a proclamation stating that the new constitution has been approved by the people despite the controversy na hindi ito pinagbotohan ng mga tao sa tamang paraan. Ang tamang paraan ng pagboto sa constitution ay ang pagboto ng tao sa mga presinto sa mga public schools kagaya ng ginagawa natin sa tuwing may election; ang 1973 constitution pinagbotohan lang sa pamamagitan ng taas-kamay. Sa original transitory provisions ng 1973 constitution yung mga incumbent senators and congressmen including the incumbent president (marcos) and incumbent VP (lopez) ang magiging members ng interim National Assembly (parliament) pero sa naging resulta ng referendum nuong first week of January 1973 nanalo ang "No" votes when the people were asked if they want to convene the interim National Assembly. On January 17, 1973 President Marcos issued a proclamation declaring that the new Constitution has been ratified by the people and that the interim National Assembly shall not be convened. The Senate and House of Representatives were formally abolished on that same day kaya ayun tanggal na sila sa trabaho effective 12 o'clock ng tanghali nuong January 17, 1973. That date nagstart formally ang one-man rule ni Marcos not on September 23, 1972 kase that time we still have the senate and the house of representatives. The parliament and the House of Representatives are the same, naiba lang ang tawag. Under the parliamentary system mas powerful ang lower house kesa sa upper house and sa lower house manggagaling ang prime minister that's why yung mga proponents ng parliamentary system sa pilipinas gusto tanggalin ang senado if ever maging parliamentary system tayo. Yung mga bansa na merong bicameral parliament like UK, Germany, Japan - ang members ng upper house nila kadalasan parang advisory body lang, ang more powerful na legislative body ay ang lower house. In UK pwedeng i-override ng House of Commons ang decision ng House of Lords. Yung original 1973 constitution ay British-style parliamentary system na unicameral National Assembly ang legislative body (so walang senado) kaso hindi agad na-implement that time kase Martial Law pa. In October 1976 nagkaron ng referendum bilang paghahanda sa election ng members of the parliament sa 1978. Originally, ang nakasaad sa 1973 constitution ay National Assembly ang ating magiging parliament, ang sistema ng election ng members ng National Assembly ay kagaya ng pagboto natin ng congressmen, so elected sila per district din. Ang naging resulta ng referendum nuong 1976 ay nanalo ang "Yes" votes sa mga questions presented dun sa balota. Isang importanteng amendment sa constitution na kasama sa pinagbotohan ng mga tao sa referendum na yun ay i-change ang sistema ng election from per district to per region sa mga members of the parliament, tapos ang name ng National Assembly will be changed to Batasang Pambansa, ang members nito shall be called Mambabatas Pambansa (MP) pero ang mga pinoys that time mas sanay tawagin sila as Assemblymen. On April 7, 1978 naganap ang election ng members ng interim Batasang Pambansa. That time si Imelda ay candidate for the National Capital Region. Depende sa dami ng population ng isang region ang dami ng Assemblymen na iboboto ng mga tao. Example: sa National Capital Region 21 names of Assemblymen ang isusulat mo sa balota mo pero yung ibang region na kaunti population kaunti lang yung iboboto nilang Assemblymen. When the interim Batasang Pambansa was convened on June 12, 1978 Marcos took his oath as Prime Minister. Dual position cia that time kase isa yun sa mga naaprubahan sa referendum nuong October 1976 na habang hindi pa lifted ang Martial Law Marcos shall be both President and Prime Minister. On January 17, 1981 Marcos lifted Martial Law pero isa mga gusto mangyari ni Marcos that time ay maging semi-presidential / semi-parliamentary ang system of government natin kagaya sa France. So ayun nagkaron uli ng referendum nuong April 7, 1981. Ciempre nanalo ang "Yes" votes. Yung originally-planned na British-style parliamentary system hindi na kailanman maipatutupad due to the 1981 amendments. The first presidential election under the amended 1973 constitution was held on June 16, 1981 at ciempre si Marcos ang nanalo, he took his oath on June 30, 1981. At that time Assemblyman Cesar Virata became the new Prime Minister pero dahil French-style na ang sistema naging head of the Cabinet at alter ego na lang ng presidente ang prime minister, unlike sa originally-planned na British-style parliamentary system wherein the chief executive is the prime minister while the president will only exercise ceremonial duties (since wala naman tayong monarchy so ang president ang magiging parang Queen Elizabeth natin). On January 27, 1984 nagkaron na naman ng referendum. Three of the important amendments sa referendum na yun ay (1) restoring the office of the Vice-President (2) ibinalik sa 40 years old ang minimum age requirement sa tatakbong presidente (3) from region-wide ay ginawang province-wide at city-wide ang election ng members ng regular (hindi na interim) Batasang Pambansa. On May 14, 1984 naganap ang election ng members ng regular Batasang Pambansa. Kung ilan ang dami ng Assemblymen sa buong probinsiya yun ang number of Assemblymen na ilalagay mo sa balota. Example sa amin sa Cavite, tatlo ang ibinoto namin kase tatlong distrito pa lang ang Cavite that time, so sa balota tatlong names of Assemblymen ang isusulat namin. Sa mga cities na hindi naman part ng any province ganun din ang sistema ng botohan. Example sa city of Manila, six ang districts ng Manila that time so ang mga taga Manila anim na names of Assemblymen ang isusulat nila sa balota. Unfortunately, yung Aquino assassination naka-affect nang todo sa image ni Marcos sa international community kaya andaming foreign businessmen ang nag-alisan that time resulting to the severe economic crisis starting from September 1983 until the EDSA revolution. Napilitan si Marcos humingi ng tulong kay Reagan pero ang naging condition ng America that time ay magkaron ng early presidential election before sila magbigay ng tulong sa Pilipinas. So ayun ang nangyari imbes na May 1987 pa ang presidential election ay naging Feb.7, 1986. On March 25, 1986 Cory abolished the Batasang Pambansa (supposed to be 1990 pa sana matatapos ang term ng mga Assemblymen). She established a revolutionary government and exercised both executive power and legislative power smilar to the powers exercised by Marcos during Martial Law. Cory stopped exercising legislative power on July 27, 1987 when the first Congress under the 1987 constitution was convened. The 1987 constitution re-established the pure presidential system of government and the bicameral Congress similar to the 1935 constitution. The 1987 constitution copied the 1935 constitution in the manner of electing the members of the House of Representatives which is one Congressman per congressional district. The province-wide and city-wide system during the Batasang Pambansa era was abandoned.
there was only 2 amendments was place in 1976 ratification, Batasan Pambansa & President can act Prime Minister until martial law. The reasons obviously is the out growing numbers of communist in the Philippines and groups that against the Philippines evolution. In my opinion 1973 & 1976 was the best constitution as they SERVES a wheel of Philippines MISFORTUNE towards, FEDERAL GOVERMENT.
Baka pwede po magtanong? Bakit po kaya hindi ginawang filipino ang lingwahe ng constitution o batas? Natanong lang po kasi maraming porsyento tuloy ng Pilipino ang masasabing hindi aral sa batas o konstitusyon natin kaya tuloy di nila kayang ipagtanggol minsan ang sarili o karapatan nila at hindi rin tuloy aral sa pagunawa kung paano tumatakbo ang ating gobyerno at ano ang dapat hanapin sa mga kumakandato. Kasi marami pa ring pilipino ang di aral sa english, kaya bakit di ginawang filipino kung para naman sa mga pilipino ang ating batas at constitution?
Hi po super clear po ng discussion nyo pero can I ask po bakit hindi constitution of biak na bato ang first constitution po? for reporting lng po sana masagot po.. salamat ;)
Good day, ma’am! I found your presentation to be a very useful source for my own presentation. I would be grateful if you would allow me to use some of the information I learned from it. Additionally, your explanations of each slide in the PowerPoint helped me fully understand the topic. May I incorporate some details from your slides into my work? I will ensure proper citation and credit you accordingly. Thank you!
I love how well-detailed this video, but the speaker way of speaking gives accent too much that some words is hard to understand. Just try to speak normal and simple next time.
hello po, is the preamble of the 1987 constitution important po? may mga articles po kasing nagsasabi na it's not important since it's not the law itself, may iba naman po na nagsasabi yes, it's important po. Tyia po!
The Americans did not free us. Also, Filipinos were able to fight against the Japanese during those years of Japanese occupation. Saying that American's saved us is a colonial statement and puts America in a glorified savior status which should not be especially that the constitution should serve its constituents not the alien colonizer.
Talaga namang sinave nila tayo in a way na sila ang nag-isip ng military strategy, soldiers, mga weapons at equipments etc. Ang ambag lang natin ay mas maraming sundalo pero wala naman tayong kakayahang talunin ang Japan. Kung hindi sila dumating, sa tingin mo makakalaya sa Japan ang Pilipinas? Ang sagot -- hindi. Para bumagsak ang Japan, dapat labanan mo sya as a whole. At yan ang ginawa ng mga Amerikano. Nakipaglaban sila sa maraming bansa na hawak ng Japan non. Kaya wag ka na magyabang na kesyo Pinoy daw nagpalaya sa Pilipinas. LOL Kung ganon pala, e bakit pa inantay ng mga pinoy na dumating mga Kano sa Pilipinas at saka lang natalo ang mga Japanese? Sa tingin mo matatalo mo ang Japan na napakalakas at sakop din nila ang East at South East Asia non?? Tama na yang proud pinoy mentality. Wala tayong nagawa non na tayo lang. Yan ang totoo. Parang China yan ngayon. Kung nasakop tayo ng China, sa tingin mo makakalaya tayo sa effort lang natin?? LOL Kelangan natin ng tulong ng Amerika at iba pang bansa na galit din sa China para matalo ang China. Ganyan din ang Japanese Empire non WW2. Hirap pa nga mga Kano nun at mga Pinoy. Nanaginip ka kung sasabihin mong kaya nating talunin ang Japanese Imperial army. Nasakop nga tayo e at bumagsak ang Bataan nagkaron pa ng death march tapos sasabihin mong Filipino save themselves. LOL Eh bakit nakalaya lang mga pinoy nung dumating ang mga Kano?? 😂
Ang constitution natin galing din sa mga Kano. Pati yung mga magagandang architecture nila. Pati yung government system at education natin. Wag ka na masyado pa proud pinoy. Wala namang nagawang achievement mga pinoy nun. Pati yang lenggwaheng ginagamit mo galing din sa kanila.
Talaga namang sinave nila tayo in a way na sila ang nag-isip ng military strategy, soldiers, mga weapons at equipments etc. Ang ambag lang natin ay mas maraming sundalo pero wala naman tayong kakayahang talunin ang Japan. Kung hindi sila dumating, sa tingin mo makakalaya sa Japan ang Pilipinas? Ang sagot -- hindi. Para bumagsak ang Japan, dapat labanan mo sya as a whole. At yan ang ginawa ng mga Amerikano. Nakipaglaban sila sa maraming bansa na hawak ng Japan non. Kaya wag ka na magyabang na kesyo Pinoy daw nagpalaya sa Pilipinas. LOL Kung ganon pala, e bakit pa inantay ng mga pinoy na dumating mga Kano sa Pilipinas at saka lang natalo ang mga Japanese? Sa tingin mo matatalo mo ang Japan na napakalakas at sakop din nila ang East at South East Asia non?? Tama na yang proud pinoy mentality. Wala tayong nagawa non na tayo lang. Yan ang totoo. Parang China yan ngayon. Kung nasakop tayo ng China, sa tingin mo makakalaya tayo sa effort lang natin?? LOL Kelangan natin ng tulong ng Amerika at iba pang bansa na galit din sa China para matalo ang China. Ganyan din ang Japanese Empire non WW2. Hirap pa nga mga Kano nun at mga Pinoy. Nanaginip ka kung sasabihin mong kaya nating talunin ang Japanese Imperial army. Nasakop nga tayo e at bumagsak ang Bataan nagkaron pa ng death march tapos sasabihin mong Filipino save themselves. LOL Eh bakit nakalaya lang mga pinoy nung dumating ang mga Kano??? 😂
Talaga namang sinave nila tayo in a way na sila ang nag-isip ng military strategy, soldiers, mga weapons at equipments etc. Ang ambag lang natin ay mas maraming sundalo pero wala naman tayong kakayahang talunin ang Japan. Kung hindi sila dumating, sa tingin mo makakalaya sa Japan ang Pilipinas? Ang sagot -- hindi. Para bumagsak ang Japan, dapat labanan mo sya as a whole. At yan ang ginawa ng mga Amerikano. Nakipaglaban sila sa maraming bansa na hawak ng Japan non. Kaya wag ka na magyabang na kesyo Pinoy daw nagpalaya sa Pilipinas. LOL Kung ganon pala, e bakit pa inantay ng mga pinoy na dumating mga Kano sa Pilipinas at saka lang natalo ang mga Japanese? Sa tingin mo matatalo mo ang Japan na napakalakas at sakop din nila ang East at South East Asia non?? Tama na yang proud pinoy mentality. Wala tayong nagawa non na tayo lang. Yan ang totoo. Parang China yan ngayon. Kung nasakop tayo ng China, sa tingin mo makakalaya tayo sa effort lang natin?? LOL Kelangan natin ng tulong ng Amerika at iba pang bansa na galit din sa China para matalo ang China. Ganyan din ang Japanese Empire non WW2. Hirap pa nga mga Kano nun at mga Pinoy. Nanaginip ka kung sasabihin mong kaya nating talunin ang Japanese Imperial army. Nasakop nga tayo e at bumagsak ang Bataan nagkaron pa ng death march tapos sasabihin mong Filipino save themselves. LOL Eh bakit nakalaya lang mga pinoy nung dumating ang mga Kano?? 😂
Totoo namang sinave lang tayo ng mga Kano nun. Nahihibang ka kung akala mo kaya mo ang Japanese empire. Kahit nga Kano hirap sa kanila. Kaya nga nakalaya lang tayo nung dumating sila after 3 years. Sakop ng Japan ang East at Southeast Asia non hindi lang Pilipinas. Ang ambag lang natin nung WW2 ay manpower, mga sundalo. Pero yung weapons, military strategy, ay sa mga Kano. Tama yang pinoy pride. Ang totoo sinave nila tayo kahit ayaw mong aminin. Hirap na hirap nga yung magkasamang pwersa ng mga Kano at Pinoy nun against Japan. Napulbos ang Maynila. Tapos ayaw mo pang aminin na sila ang "saviour" natin. Masyadong OA na yung pagkamuhi sa mga "colonizer" kuno. Ang totoo mahina tayo.
How many constitutions are there in the evolving history of governance in the Philippines? which of these does not qualify as a constitution based on the meaning, purpose, and scope of a constitution? gave me an example
actually tatlo lang ang constitutions na talagang ginamit: 1935, 1973 and yung current na ginagamit natin which is the 1987 constitution. Yung Biak Na Bato at Malolos Constitution sobrang short-lived lang, hindi halos nagamit dahil sumiklab na ang Filipino-American War and we became a colony of the US.
A Constitution has to be made with care. Even the U.S. had to redo its Constitution. We just called it the "Articles of Confederation." He he. Some Thoughts: 9:50 This could go well. 11:18 ... 12:35 Hmmmm yes. All of the power. Will not result in bad stuff in the right hands. Yes. 13:58 Part 2: Electric Boogaloo... 14:38 Freedom happiness noises. 16:09 Yes! Pure democracy is not enough, Checks and Balances are the butter to the bread. Civil LIberties are important as well :D
The original 1935 Constitution ay unicameral na National Assemly ang legislature. The Assemblymen's term of office ay 3 years. Ang presidente naman and VP ay 6 years ang term pero one term lang ang presidente hindi pwedeng ma-reelect. Ang SONA ay ginaganap every 4th Monday of January. On June 18, 1940, the 1935 Constitution was amended. Ang term ng presidente at VP ay ginawang 4 years pero pwedeng ma-reelect ng isang beses ang presidente, so total of 8 years. The National Assembly was renamed as House of Representatives and the Assemblymen were then called as Congressmen or Representatives. Their term of office ay ginawang 4 years. Kasama sa amendment ang pagbabalik ng Senado, pero ang election ng Senators ay nationwide na, hindi kagaya sa Jones Law of 1916 na ang mga senador ay ibinoboto per Senatorial District. The first election for the 24 senators under the amended version of the 1935 Constitution ay naganap nuong November 11, 1941 kasabay ng election ng presidente, VP and congressmen. The first 8 senators who obtained the highest number of votes shall serve for 6 years (until December 30, 1947), the second 8 senators who obtained the highest number shall serve for 4 years (until December 30, 1945), and the third 8 senators who obtained the highest number shall serve for 2 years (until December 30, 1943). This means that beginning 1943 and every 2 years thereafter we shall elect 8 senators whose term shall be 6 years. Kasabay sana ng election ng 8 senators on November 9, 1943 ang mga local government officials such as mayors and governors; kaso biglang sumiklab ang WW2. Ang term of office ng mga local government officials during that time ay ginawa ding 4 years from 3 years; so bale pare-parehong 4 years ang term ng presidente, VP, congressmen and local government officials; tanging senators lang ang naiiba ang term which is 6 years. Si President Quezon na-reelect cia during the November 11, 1941 elections pero since he was first elected as president in 1935, he shall only serve until 1943, from there ipapasa na nya sa VP ang pagiging presidente. Hindi nya pwedeng i-serve ang buong term na 4 years (1941-1945) kase lalampas ng 8 years ang total. Eh kaso lahat ng plano nabalewala kase sumiklab ang WW2. Yung term of office ng mga elected officials natin napurnada lahat during that time.
Might I add, the controversial election results was caused by namfrel having Cory slightly in the lead at 69% voted counted as opposed to 100% by comelec. So, 2million (out of 50million) attended edsa 1 because of an unfinished counting.
Great content po. May I know po kung anong editing software ang ginagamit niyo po? This will be a great help for my online requirements. Thank you very much po😊
The original 1935 Constitution ay unicameral na National Assemly ang legislature. The Assemblymen's term of office ay 3 years. Ang presidente naman and VP ay 6 years ang term pero one term lang ang presidente hindi pwedeng ma-reelect. Ang SONA ay ginaganap every 4th Monday of January. On June 18, 1940, the 1935 Constitution was amended. Ang term ng presidente at VP ay ginawang 4 years pero pwedeng ma-reelect ng isang beses ang presidente, so total of 8 years. The National Assembly was renamed as House of Representatives and the Assemblymen were then called as Congressmen or Representatives. Their term of office ay ginawang 4 years. Kasama sa amendment ang pagbabalik ng Senado, pero ang election ng Senators ay nationwide na, hindi kagaya sa Jones Law of 1916 na ang mga senador ay ibinoboto per Senatorial District. The first election for the 24 senators under the amended version of the 1935 Constitution ay naganap nuong November 11, 1941 kasabay ng election ng presidente, VP and congressmen. The first 8 senators who obtained the highest number of votes shall serve for 6 years (until December 30, 1947), the second 8 senators who obtained the highest number shall serve for 4 years (until December 30, 1945), and the third 8 senators who obtained the highest number shall serve for 2 years (until December 30, 1943). This means that beginning 1943 and every 2 years thereafter we shall elect 8 senators whose term shall be 6 years. Kasabay sana ng election ng 8 senators on November 9, 1943 ang mga local government officials such as mayors and governors; kaso biglang sumiklab ang WW2. Ang term of office ng mga local government officials during that time ay ginawa ding 4 years from 3 years; so bale pare-parehong 4 years ang term ng presidente, VP, congressmen and local government officials; tanging senators lang ang naiiba ang term which is 6 years. Si President Quezon na-reelect cia during the November 11, 1941 elections pero since he was first elected as president in 1935, he shall only serve until 1943, from there ipapasa na nya sa VP ang pagiging presidente. Hindi nya pwedeng i-serve ang buong term na 4 years (1941-1945) kase lalampas ng 8 years ang total. Eh kaso lahat ng plano nabalewala kase sumiklab ang WW2. Yung term of office ng mga elected officials natin napurnada lahat during that time.
You're wrong, the assassination of ninoy was happen in 1983 and in fact ninoy was branded as a rebel during marcos regime, there's some people of course are angry but not many, it wasn't the cause of the 1986 snap election.
ARE YOU PREPARING FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE EXAMS?
If you want to surely PASS the Civil Service Examination,
our ULTIMATE CIVIL SERVICE EXAMINATION REVIEW
is currently at 85% off!!!
Pay only P300 instead of P2,000.😱😱😱
What can you expect in this review?
✍Video discussions are well-explained in Taglish for you to better understand the concepts.
✍Lecture notes are summarized, simplified and printable.
✍Techniques are employed to simplify difficult topics and problems.
✍Test Analytics are used to aid you in your review preparation.
✍There are thousands of test questions based on the Actual Civil Service Examination.
Plus, you can have your review anytime, anywhere!😱
To enroll, just click the link below:😊
quizzer.thinkerville.net/endorsements.php
Ang ganda po ng pagka-explain. Mas naintindihan ko po talaga siya. Salamat po dito! Sobrang galing!
The parliament and the House of Representatives are the same, naiba lang ang tawag. Under the parliamentary system mas powerful ang lower house kesa sa upper house and sa lower house manggagaling ang prime minister that's why yung mga proponents ng parliamentary system sa pilipinas gusto tanggalin ang senado if ever maging parliamentary system tayo. Yung mga bansa na merong bicameral parliament like UK, Germany, Japan - ang members ng upper house nila kadalasan parang advisory body lang, ang more powerful na legislative body ay ang lower house. In UK pwedeng i-override ng House of Commons ang decision ng House of Lords. Ano ang main differrence ng presidential system sa parliamentary system? The difference is how the chief executive is elected. Sa presidential system ang chief executive ay presidente while sa parliamentary system ang chief executive ay prime minister. Fixed ang term of office ng presidente pero ang sa prime minister ay hindi. Sa presidential system separate ang boto for the chief executive (president) and yung boto for the members of the legislative body (senate and house). Sa parliamentary system hindi tayo boboto ng chief executive (prime minister), ang tanging iboboto lang natin ay ang members ng legislative body (depende sa nakasaad sa constitution kung bicameral or unicameral). Yung partido na nakakuha ng majority ng seats sa lower house of the legislative body ang magdedecide kung sino ang magiging prime minister from among their members. Yung legislative body din ang pipili ng magiging presidente who will exercise ceremonial duties only. Sa mga bansang may monarkiya like UK, yung Queen (or King as the case may be) nila ang nag-eexercise ng ceremonial duties. Sa madaling salita meron pa din tayong presidente kapag nag-parliamentary system tayo, fixed ang term of office nya pero wala ciang executive power, para lang ciang si Queen Elizabeth na ceremonial lang ang duties. Ang mga duties and responsibilities ng presidente ay "above politics" kumbaga and he/she represents the stability and unity of the Filipinos. Once naging prime minister ang isang miembro ng legislative body pipili cia ng mga cabinet members nya from the members of the legislative body din which means mga kapartido nya. Pero ang prime minister at ang mga kabinete will remain as members of the legislative body which means they will not vacate their seats, unlike sa presidential system na kapag ang isang senador or congressman inappoint ng presidente as cabinet member kailangan nya magresign. Why? kase sa presidential system separate ang executive department sa legislative department. Best example si congressman Mark Villar diba inappoint cia ni duterte as secretary of public works and highways, so nagresign cia as congressman kase hindi pwedeng dual position. Sa parliamentary system hindi porke na-appoint kang cabinet member magreresign ka na as member of the legislative body. To make it simple, kapag nag-parliamentary system tayo ang powers of the government ay mapupunta sa mga congressmen, sila na lang ang iboboto natin at mga local government officials, mawawala na ang botohan for president, vice-president and senators (depende kung ire-retain ang senado kase sa parliamentary system mas powerful ang lower house kesa sa upper house). Ang term of office ng prime minister ay hindi fixed, kapag hindi maganda performance nya anytime pwede ciang tanggalin ng mga kapartido nyang congressmen. Ang position ng prime minister ay pwedeng ihalintulad sa Speaker of the House of Representatives na pwedeng tanggalin anytime. Pero pag natanggal cia as prime minister balik cia sa pagiging ordinary congressman. Kapag hindi magkasundo sa madaming issues ang mga congressmen, the prime minister may send a request to the president of the phillippines to dissolve the legislative body to have an early election of its members. Once the president approves the request magkakaron ng maagang election ang mga congressmen kahit hindi pa tapos ang termino nila. Sa presidential system hindi pwede ang early election, that is not allowed. By the way, kung sa presidential system ang tawag sa miembro ng cabinet ay secretary, sa parliamentary system ang tawag ay minister. Ang bawat secretary ay head of each department while sa parliamentary system bawat minister ay head of each ministry. Example: ang secretary of education ang head ng department of education; sa parliamentary system ang minister of education ang head ng ministry of education. Yung original 1973 constitution ay British-style parliamentary system na unicameral National Assembly ang legislative body (so walang senado) kaso hindi naman natupad kahit kelan ang pure parliamentary system sa Pilipinas. On January 17, 1981 Marcos lifted Martial Law pero isa mga gusto mangyari ni Marcos that time ay maging semi-presidential / semi-parliamentary ang system of government natin kagaya sa France. So nagkaron ng referendum nuong April 7, 1981 para bumoto ang mga Pilipino ng "Yes" or "No" kung payag sila sa proposed amendment. Ciempre nanalo ang "Yes" votes. Yung originally-planned na British-style parliamentary system hindi na kailanman maipatutupad due to the 1981 amendments. The first presidential election under the amended 1973 constitution was held on June 16, 1981 at ciempre si Marcos ang nanalo, he took his oath on June 30, 1981. At that time Assemblyman Cesar Virata became the Prime Minister pero dahil French-style na ang sistema naging head of the Cabinet and alter ego na lang ng presidente ang prime minister, unlike sa originally-planned na British-style parliamentary system wherein the chief executive is the prime minister while the president will only exercise ceremonial duties (since wala naman tayong monarchy so ang president ang magiging parang Queen Elizabeth natin).
Thank you! Very insightful.
Thank you❤
This is a big help to my review wwhile waiting for FOE schedule. Thank you and God Bless!
Why is no one talking about how good her voice is?Its like listening to a radio anyway thank you for this its really really great♡
Great introduction, just relocated to the Philippines and trying to learn as much as possible 😊🇵🇭
Thank u ur helping my assignment!.
Our pleasure.
Sobrang laking tulong saken neto . Pati sa gaya kont freshman sa criminology
I love how you briefly explain each "CONSTITUTION" it's gives me a lot of idea with regards to our constitution. But please, kindly pronounce each word appropriately for us not to heard this too distractive.
Excuse me may I add that in the 1935 Constitution with amendment, the president and vice president had a 4-year term *WITH* reelection, not without. Your diagram mistakenly says it does. Kinly address thhis matter in your description or in the comments to avoid confusion. Thank you!
Thank you it's helpful to the student like me❣️😇 God bless
It’s very informative and concise! I like how you explain each constitution. May I ask if I can use your video as a reference material for my school reporting about the topic? Thank you and God bless😊
Thank you so much for this video, iLike the idea of playing basketball the executive etc.
Thanks for the good info, i hope for the changing times our 1987 constitution should be updated there are some loopholes and too buggy just imagine some highest post in the govt need only be able to read and write as requirements while the ordinary office worker for a small company with less responsibility need at least college degree as requirement. anyway thanks for the info
Aside from said changes, could you state some more of the bugs of the 1987 constitution that you may or may not desire to be changed?
@@williamkitsabadoii
We must remove 60/40 Policy, Revise our government (From Presidential-Unitary to Federal-Parliamentary), Open-FDI and Remove Economic Restrictions.
@@medilynlim5623 and should bring back the 4 year term presidency with re election also known as 1935 constitution
@@rainr this was discussed during the deliberations of the commissioners of the 1986 constitutional commission. However, dahil katatapos lang ng EDSA '86 that time very anti-marcos ang atmosphere nuon, so ayaw na nila yung 4 years with one re-election kase ang katwiran nila ayaw na nilang maulit na magkaron uli tayo ng presidente na kapag nakatikim ng re-election ayaw nang umalis sa pwesto.
@@medilynlim5623 Ok sana ang 1987 constitution, may kapalpakan lang sa ibang articles and sections. Yung article for Amendments vague cia kase hindi na-mention na voting separately ang Senate and House unlike sa 1935 constitution na crystal clear walang mako-confuse. Yung National Economy and Patrimony sobrang higpit sa mga foreign investors. Yung gusto ng ibang tao na ibalik ang two-party system hindi yun matutupad kase sa mismong 1987 constitution nakasaad na "a free and open party system shall be allowed to evolve according to the free choice of the people". Yung inggitan at silipan ng mga senators and congressmen sa term limits nila could have been prevented kung ginawang equal sana ang years of service nila; tutal 3 years ang term ng congressmen sana they were allowed to serve for 4 consecutive terms para ang total ay 12 years kagaya sa mga senators na two consecutive 6-year term (12 years). Yung party-list system sana pinattern na lang sa sectoral representation ng 1973 constitution (as amended). Sa party-list system na meron tayo under the 1987 constitution lahat ng tao bumoboto sa party-list kahit hindi naman lahat tayo miembro ng marginalized sector. Ang pinaka-ayoko sa 1987 Constitution ay ginawang discretion ng mga senador and congressmen ang number of sessions nila per year kaya sobrang unproductive nila unlike sa 1935 Constitution na minimum of 100 days ang sessions per year.
Thank you po sa magandang idea.
This video was really helpful to me Keep it up!😊
Thank you so much for the appreciation.
thank you so much i learned a lot from this video..❤️🙏❤️🙏
Godbless you more
Thank you for this very informative video.
Very helpful video and informative.
Thank you I understand it so much!!
Thanks for your clear, concise and highly creative online Reviewer!
I gave my subscription for this video.
Good educational video
Helped a lot of me
Thank for subscribing po.
I drink everytime she says “CoNshteeThutusheen”.
Hahahaha
"chaughhs"
you got it daddy HAHAHAHAHAHHA
😳😆
@@taniavlogs1757 tf
thank you for this!
Thank youuu. Really helped me a lot.
Very informative but the year in 9:12 of the video is a mistake. We need to be accurate most importantly because there is a lot of misinformation online 😉
THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!
Thank you so much for this
thank you so much! it's a big help 💙
On March 16, 1967, the Senate and the House of Representatives passed a resolution calling for a Constitutional Convention in 1971. Another resolution was passed on June 17, 1969 to amend some sections of the original resolution. On August 24, 1970 President Marcos signed into law Republic Act No. 6132 setting the election for the Delegates of the Constitutional Convention on the second Tuesday of November 1970. On November 10, 1970 nagkaron ng election for the members of the 1971 Constitutional Convention. Ang sistema ng pagboto ng Convention Delegates ay per district kagaya sa pagboto natin ng congressmen, yun nga lang kapag bumoboto tayo ng congressman isa lang per district. Yung number of Delegates per district sa buong Pilipinas basahin mo na lang sa Republic Act No. 6132. Yung mga nanalo sa election na yun ay nag-meet nuong June 1, 1971. Dun nagsimula ang pagdidiscuss nila kung papaano isusulat ang proposed new constitution ng pilipinas. Antagal ng deliberations nila - from June 1, 1971 until November 29, 1972. In January 1973 pinagbotohan ng mga tao sa bawat barangay sa pamamagitan ng taas-kamay kung sang-ayon sila (Yes vote) or hindi sang-ayon (No vote) sa proposed new constitution. On January 17, 1973 Marcos issued a proclamation stating that the new constitution has been approved by the people despite the controversy na hindi ito pinagbotohan ng mga tao sa tamang paraan. Ang tamang paraan ng pagboto sa constitution ay ang pagboto ng tao sa mga presinto sa mga public schools kagaya ng ginagawa natin sa tuwing may election; ang 1973 constitution pinagbotohan lang sa pamamagitan ng taas-kamay.
Sa original transitory provisions ng 1973 constitution yung mga incumbent senators and congressmen including the incumbent president (marcos) and incumbent VP (lopez) ang magiging members ng interim National Assembly (parliament) pero sa naging resulta ng referendum nuong first week of January 1973 nanalo ang "No" votes when the people were asked if they want to convene the interim National Assembly. On January 17, 1973 President Marcos issued a proclamation declaring that the new Constitution has been ratified by the people and that the interim National Assembly shall not be convened. The Senate and House of Representatives were formally abolished on that same day kaya ayun tanggal na sila sa trabaho effective 12 o'clock ng tanghali nuong January 17, 1973. That date nagstart formally ang one-man rule ni Marcos not on September 23, 1972 kase that time we still have the senate and the house of representatives. The parliament and the House of Representatives are the same, naiba lang ang tawag. Under the parliamentary system mas powerful ang lower house kesa sa upper house and sa lower house manggagaling ang prime minister that's why yung mga proponents ng parliamentary system sa pilipinas gusto tanggalin ang senado if ever maging parliamentary system tayo. Yung mga bansa na merong bicameral parliament like UK, Germany, Japan - ang members ng upper house nila kadalasan parang advisory body lang, ang more powerful na legislative body ay ang lower house. In UK pwedeng i-override ng House of Commons ang decision ng House of Lords. Yung original 1973 constitution ay British-style parliamentary system na unicameral National Assembly ang legislative body (so walang senado) kaso hindi agad na-implement that time kase Martial Law pa. In October 1976 nagkaron ng referendum bilang paghahanda sa election ng members of the parliament sa 1978. Originally, ang nakasaad sa 1973 constitution ay National Assembly ang ating magiging parliament, ang sistema ng election ng members ng National Assembly ay kagaya ng pagboto natin ng congressmen, so elected sila per district din. Ang naging resulta ng referendum nuong 1976 ay nanalo ang "Yes" votes sa mga questions presented dun sa balota. Isang importanteng amendment sa constitution na kasama sa pinagbotohan ng mga tao sa referendum na yun ay i-change ang sistema ng election from per district to per region sa mga members of the parliament, tapos ang name ng National Assembly will be changed to Batasang Pambansa, ang members nito shall be called Mambabatas Pambansa (MP) pero ang mga pinoys that time mas sanay tawagin sila as Assemblymen. On April 7, 1978 naganap ang election ng members ng interim Batasang Pambansa. That time si Imelda ay candidate for the National Capital Region. Depende sa dami ng population ng isang region ang dami ng Assemblymen na iboboto ng mga tao. Example: sa National Capital Region 21 names of Assemblymen ang isusulat mo sa balota mo pero yung ibang region na kaunti population kaunti lang yung iboboto nilang Assemblymen. When the interim Batasang Pambansa was convened on June 12, 1978 Marcos took his oath as Prime Minister. Dual position cia that time kase isa yun sa mga naaprubahan sa referendum nuong October 1976 na habang hindi pa lifted ang Martial Law Marcos shall be both President and Prime Minister. On January 17, 1981 Marcos lifted Martial Law pero isa mga gusto mangyari ni Marcos that time ay maging semi-presidential / semi-parliamentary ang system of government natin kagaya sa France. So ayun nagkaron uli ng referendum nuong April 7, 1981. Ciempre nanalo ang "Yes" votes. Yung originally-planned na British-style parliamentary system hindi na kailanman maipatutupad due to the 1981 amendments. The first presidential election under the amended 1973 constitution was held on June 16, 1981 at ciempre si Marcos ang nanalo, he took his oath on June 30, 1981. At that time Assemblyman Cesar Virata became the new Prime Minister pero dahil French-style na ang sistema naging head of the Cabinet at alter ego na lang ng presidente ang prime minister, unlike sa originally-planned na British-style parliamentary system wherein the chief executive is the prime minister while the president will only exercise ceremonial duties (since wala naman tayong monarchy so ang president ang magiging parang Queen Elizabeth natin). On January 27, 1984 nagkaron na naman ng referendum. Three of the important amendments sa referendum na yun ay (1) restoring the office of the Vice-President (2) ibinalik sa 40 years old ang minimum age requirement sa tatakbong presidente (3) from region-wide ay ginawang province-wide at city-wide ang election ng members ng regular (hindi na interim) Batasang Pambansa. On May 14, 1984 naganap ang election ng members ng regular Batasang Pambansa. Kung ilan ang dami ng Assemblymen sa buong probinsiya yun ang number of Assemblymen na ilalagay mo sa balota. Example sa amin sa Cavite, tatlo ang ibinoto namin kase tatlong distrito pa lang ang Cavite that time, so sa balota tatlong names of Assemblymen ang isusulat namin. Sa mga cities na hindi naman part ng any province ganun din ang sistema ng botohan. Example sa city of Manila, six ang districts ng Manila that time so ang mga taga Manila anim na names of Assemblymen ang isusulat nila sa balota. Unfortunately, yung Aquino assassination naka-affect nang todo sa image ni Marcos sa international community kaya andaming foreign businessmen ang nag-alisan that time resulting to the severe economic crisis starting from September 1983 until the EDSA revolution. Napilitan si Marcos humingi ng tulong kay Reagan pero ang naging condition ng America that time ay magkaron ng early presidential election before sila magbigay ng tulong sa Pilipinas. So ayun ang nangyari imbes na May 1987 pa ang presidential election ay naging Feb.7, 1986. On March 25, 1986 Cory abolished the Batasang Pambansa (supposed to be 1990 pa sana matatapos ang term ng mga Assemblymen). She established a revolutionary government and exercised both executive power and legislative power smilar to the powers exercised by Marcos during Martial Law. Cory stopped exercising legislative power on July 27, 1987 when the first Congress under the 1987 constitution was convened. The 1987 constitution re-established the pure presidential system of government and the bicameral Congress similar to the 1935 constitution. The 1987 constitution copied the 1935 constitution in the manner of electing the members of the House of Representatives which is one Congressman per congressional district. The province-wide and city-wide system during the Batasang Pambansa era was abandoned.
Thanks ma'am ❤️
thank you so much for thisss.
nice! indeed great and helpful.. your voice is excellent anyway hehe
Thank you Ma'am 😀
Thank you
Do you have a video for critique analysis about this constitution?
Can I ask why there were several amendments on the 1973 constitution?
there was only 2 amendments was place in 1976 ratification, Batasan Pambansa & President can act Prime Minister until martial law. The reasons obviously is the out growing numbers of communist in the Philippines and groups that against the Philippines evolution. In my opinion 1973 & 1976 was the best constitution as they SERVES a wheel of Philippines MISFORTUNE towards, FEDERAL GOVERMENT.
permission to use the slide of 1987 constitution on our report thankyou!
Very helpful! Thanks!
hello, I just wanna ask if why is the 1897 constitution also known as the Biak-na-bato included?
Very informative video!
I just find the basketball metaphor unrelated and confusing though...
Baka pwede po magtanong? Bakit po kaya hindi ginawang filipino ang lingwahe ng constitution o batas? Natanong lang po kasi maraming porsyento tuloy ng Pilipino ang masasabing hindi aral sa batas o konstitusyon natin kaya tuloy di nila kayang ipagtanggol minsan ang sarili o karapatan nila at hindi rin tuloy aral sa pagunawa kung paano tumatakbo ang ating gobyerno at ano ang dapat hanapin sa mga kumakandato. Kasi marami pa ring pilipino ang di aral sa english, kaya bakit di ginawang filipino kung para naman sa mga pilipino ang ating batas at constitution?
Hi po super clear po ng discussion nyo pero can I ask po bakit hindi constitution of biak na bato ang first constitution po?
for reporting lng po sana masagot po.. salamat ;)
Get all the information you need for the Civil Service Examination here: quizzer.thinkerville.net/
Good day, ma’am! I found your presentation to be a very useful source for my own presentation. I would be grateful if you would allow me to use some of the information I learned from it. Additionally, your explanations of each slide in the PowerPoint helped me fully understand the topic. May I incorporate some details from your slides into my work? I will ensure proper citation and credit you accordingly. Thank you!
the difference between the past and present constitution
I love how well-detailed this video, but the speaker way of speaking gives accent too much that some words is hard to understand. Just try to speak normal and simple next time.
can i have the soft copy of your presentation?
Hello, may I use your video for research and reporting purposes? Thank you very much.
Its very helping me thank you😍💯 may I ask question what constitution provisitions to enforce the stability of tourism and hospitality industry?
the thumbnail is like:
Meet the
Philippine Constitution
hello po, is the preamble of the 1987 constitution important po? may mga articles po kasing nagsasabi na it's not important since it's not the law itself, may iba naman po na nagsasabi yes, it's important po. Tyia po!
The Americans did not free us. Also, Filipinos were able to fight against the Japanese during those years of Japanese occupation. Saying that American's saved us is a colonial statement and puts America in a glorified savior status which should not be especially that the constitution should serve its constituents not the alien colonizer.
Talaga namang sinave nila tayo in a way na sila ang nag-isip ng military strategy, soldiers, mga weapons at equipments etc. Ang ambag lang natin ay mas maraming sundalo pero wala naman tayong kakayahang talunin ang Japan. Kung hindi sila dumating, sa tingin mo makakalaya sa Japan ang Pilipinas? Ang sagot -- hindi. Para bumagsak ang Japan, dapat labanan mo sya as a whole. At yan ang ginawa ng mga Amerikano. Nakipaglaban sila sa maraming bansa na hawak ng Japan non. Kaya wag ka na magyabang na kesyo Pinoy daw nagpalaya sa Pilipinas. LOL Kung ganon pala, e bakit pa inantay ng mga pinoy na dumating mga Kano sa Pilipinas at saka lang natalo ang mga Japanese? Sa tingin mo matatalo mo ang Japan na napakalakas at sakop din nila ang East at South East Asia non?? Tama na yang proud pinoy mentality. Wala tayong nagawa non na tayo lang. Yan ang totoo.
Parang China yan ngayon. Kung nasakop tayo ng China, sa tingin mo makakalaya tayo sa effort lang natin?? LOL Kelangan natin ng tulong ng Amerika at iba pang bansa na galit din sa China para matalo ang China. Ganyan din ang Japanese Empire non WW2. Hirap pa nga mga Kano nun at mga Pinoy. Nanaginip ka kung sasabihin mong kaya nating talunin ang Japanese Imperial army. Nasakop nga tayo e at bumagsak ang Bataan nagkaron pa ng death march tapos sasabihin mong Filipino save themselves. LOL Eh bakit nakalaya lang mga pinoy nung dumating ang mga Kano?? 😂
Ang constitution natin galing din sa mga Kano. Pati yung mga magagandang architecture nila. Pati yung government system at education natin. Wag ka na masyado pa proud pinoy. Wala namang nagawang achievement mga pinoy nun. Pati yang lenggwaheng ginagamit mo galing din sa kanila.
Talaga namang sinave nila tayo in a way na sila ang nag-isip ng military strategy, soldiers, mga weapons at equipments etc. Ang ambag lang natin ay mas maraming sundalo pero wala naman tayong kakayahang talunin ang Japan. Kung hindi sila dumating, sa tingin mo makakalaya sa Japan ang Pilipinas? Ang sagot -- hindi. Para bumagsak ang Japan, dapat labanan mo sya as a whole. At yan ang ginawa ng mga Amerikano. Nakipaglaban sila sa maraming bansa na hawak ng Japan non. Kaya wag ka na magyabang na kesyo Pinoy daw nagpalaya sa Pilipinas. LOL Kung ganon pala, e bakit pa inantay ng mga pinoy na dumating mga Kano sa Pilipinas at saka lang natalo ang mga Japanese? Sa tingin mo matatalo mo ang Japan na napakalakas at sakop din nila ang East at South East Asia non?? Tama na yang proud pinoy mentality. Wala tayong nagawa non na tayo lang. Yan ang totoo.
Parang China yan ngayon. Kung nasakop tayo ng China, sa tingin mo makakalaya tayo sa effort lang natin?? LOL Kelangan natin ng tulong ng Amerika at iba pang bansa na galit din sa China para matalo ang China. Ganyan din ang Japanese Empire non WW2. Hirap pa nga mga Kano nun at mga Pinoy. Nanaginip ka kung sasabihin mong kaya nating talunin ang Japanese Imperial army. Nasakop nga tayo e at bumagsak ang Bataan nagkaron pa ng death march tapos sasabihin mong Filipino save themselves. LOL Eh bakit nakalaya lang mga pinoy nung dumating ang mga Kano??? 😂
Talaga namang sinave nila tayo in a way na sila ang nag-isip ng military strategy, soldiers, mga weapons at equipments etc. Ang ambag lang natin ay mas maraming sundalo pero wala naman tayong kakayahang talunin ang Japan. Kung hindi sila dumating, sa tingin mo makakalaya sa Japan ang Pilipinas? Ang sagot -- hindi. Para bumagsak ang Japan, dapat labanan mo sya as a whole. At yan ang ginawa ng mga Amerikano. Nakipaglaban sila sa maraming bansa na hawak ng Japan non. Kaya wag ka na magyabang na kesyo Pinoy daw nagpalaya sa Pilipinas. LOL Kung ganon pala, e bakit pa inantay ng mga pinoy na dumating mga Kano sa Pilipinas at saka lang natalo ang mga Japanese? Sa tingin mo matatalo mo ang Japan na napakalakas at sakop din nila ang East at South East Asia non?? Tama na yang proud pinoy mentality. Wala tayong nagawa non na tayo lang. Yan ang totoo.
Parang China yan ngayon. Kung nasakop tayo ng China, sa tingin mo makakalaya tayo sa effort lang natin?? LOL Kelangan natin ng tulong ng Amerika at iba pang bansa na galit din sa China para matalo ang China. Ganyan din ang Japanese Empire non WW2. Hirap pa nga mga Kano nun at mga Pinoy. Nanaginip ka kung sasabihin mong kaya nating talunin ang Japanese Imperial army. Nasakop nga tayo e at bumagsak ang Bataan nagkaron pa ng death march tapos sasabihin mong Filipino save themselves. LOL Eh bakit nakalaya lang mga pinoy nung dumating ang mga Kano?? 😂
Totoo namang sinave lang tayo ng mga Kano nun. Nahihibang ka kung akala mo kaya mo ang Japanese empire. Kahit nga Kano hirap sa kanila. Kaya nga nakalaya lang tayo nung dumating sila after 3 years. Sakop ng Japan ang East at Southeast Asia non hindi lang Pilipinas. Ang ambag lang natin nung WW2 ay manpower, mga sundalo. Pero yung weapons, military strategy, ay sa mga Kano. Tama yang pinoy pride. Ang totoo sinave nila tayo kahit ayaw mong aminin. Hirap na hirap nga yung magkasamang pwersa ng mga Kano at Pinoy nun against Japan. Napulbos ang Maynila. Tapos ayaw mo pang aminin na sila ang "saviour" natin. Masyadong OA na yung pagkamuhi sa mga "colonizer" kuno. Ang totoo mahina tayo.
hello ma'am, may i ask if you know the exact date when there is no operative constitution in the Philippines?
Thank you
Thanks
hello may i know the speaker's name? i couldn't really understand i will be using their name for citations thank you in advance
9:22 you say 1934 instead of 1943
Hello po so kailangan po ba yun date or year where the Philippines has no operative constitutions?
How many constitutions are there in the evolving history of
governance in the Philippines?
which of these does not qualify as a
constitution based on the meaning, purpose, and scope of a constitution? gave me an example
actually tatlo lang ang constitutions na talagang ginamit: 1935, 1973 and yung current na ginagamit natin which is the 1987 constitution. Yung Biak Na Bato at Malolos Constitution sobrang short-lived lang, hindi halos nagamit dahil sumiklab na ang Filipino-American War and we became a colony of the US.
Did the Spanish Goverment, did not use constitution in the Philippines? As I know, Aguinaldo is Kalihim under Spanish goverment.
Thank you for explaining well.
Sicat, Jean Nicole V. BSAR 1-F
Instructor: Sir John Reinjoe Fajardo Namit
What editor did you use?
Santos, Ian Emanuel N.
BSAR 1F
Instructor: John Reinjoe F. Namit
may i ask po kung anong app ang ginamit for making the video🥺
thank you ❤
Thanj you so muchhhh
Why d naisali o naintroduce ung biak na bato constitution?
I like how she says "Cownstetesiyeen"
A Constitution has to be made with care. Even the U.S. had to redo its Constitution. We just called it the "Articles of Confederation." He he.
Some Thoughts:
9:50 This could go well.
11:18 ...
12:35 Hmmmm yes. All of the power. Will not result in bad stuff in the right hands. Yes.
13:58 Part 2: Electric Boogaloo...
14:38 Freedom happiness noises.
16:09 Yes! Pure democracy is not enough, Checks and Balances are the butter to the bread. Civil LIberties are important as well :D
Isn't the 1935 constitution a unicameral?
The original 1935 Constitution ay unicameral na National Assemly ang legislature. The Assemblymen's term of office ay 3 years. Ang presidente naman and VP ay 6 years ang term pero one term lang ang presidente hindi pwedeng ma-reelect. Ang SONA ay ginaganap every 4th Monday of January. On June 18, 1940, the 1935 Constitution was amended. Ang term ng presidente at VP ay ginawang 4 years pero pwedeng ma-reelect ng isang beses ang presidente, so total of 8 years. The National Assembly was renamed as House of Representatives and the Assemblymen were then called as Congressmen or Representatives. Their term of office ay ginawang 4 years. Kasama sa amendment ang pagbabalik ng Senado, pero ang election ng Senators ay nationwide na, hindi kagaya sa Jones Law of 1916 na ang mga senador ay ibinoboto per Senatorial District. The first election for the 24 senators under the amended version of the 1935 Constitution ay naganap nuong November 11, 1941 kasabay ng election ng presidente, VP and congressmen. The first 8 senators who obtained the highest number of votes shall serve for 6 years (until December 30, 1947), the second 8 senators who obtained the highest number shall serve for 4 years (until December 30, 1945), and the third 8 senators who obtained the highest number shall serve for 2 years (until December 30, 1943). This means that beginning 1943 and every 2 years thereafter we shall elect 8 senators whose term shall be 6 years. Kasabay sana ng election ng 8 senators on November 9, 1943 ang mga local government officials such as mayors and governors; kaso biglang sumiklab ang WW2. Ang term of office ng mga local government officials during that time ay ginawa ding 4 years from 3 years; so bale pare-parehong 4 years ang term ng presidente, VP, congressmen and local government officials; tanging senators lang ang naiiba ang term which is 6 years. Si President Quezon na-reelect cia during the November 11, 1941 elections pero since he was first elected as president in 1935, he shall only serve until 1943, from there ipapasa na nya sa VP ang pagiging presidente. Hindi nya pwedeng i-serve ang buong term na 4 years (1941-1945) kase lalampas ng 8 years ang total. Eh kaso lahat ng plano nabalewala kase sumiklab ang WW2. Yung term of office ng mga elected officials natin napurnada lahat during that time.
Hi classmates
Soto, Audrey Anne S.
BSAR 1F
Instructor: John Reinjoe F. Namit
Can l use your ppt for my report
Article 8 upload pls
What is the impact of the Philippine Constitution to you as a Filipino?
Might I add, the controversial election results was caused by namfrel having Cory slightly in the lead at 69% voted counted as opposed to 100% by comelec. So, 2million (out of 50million) attended edsa 1 because of an unfinished counting.
could you maybe elaborate more?
Thankyou
name po ng background music
th-cam.com/video/muUMs_U7ttQ/w-d-xo.html
Well they could've picked a better speaker
Music title pls
Ma'am/Sir can I use your video as a transcription material? I intended to use it for my portfolio. Waiting for your permission, thanks😄
yawa. you help me a lot for my study. Thank you
Ur very bad
Thanks for the appreciation sir.
@@civilservicereviewtv may i know what editor u used? 🥰
Great content po. May I know po kung anong editing software ang ginagamit niyo po? This will be a great help for my online requirements. Thank you very much po😊
thankyouuu
Request permission to use the presentation in our report.
6:50
❤❤❤
1899 constitution diba meron Prime Minister?
tama. meron.
what video editor did you used?
Ano po ba yong conclusion sa 7 constitution 😭
What is law.?
It is clearly subjective revision of constitution.... what happened to us now and to the claim in Sabah ..
Wag nyo na po lagyan ng background music please. pra po mas better. hehe 🥲
di ko tlaga kinakaya yung kHonsTeetuSheen mo teh chariz
Municipal trial Court Regional trail Court and Sufrime Court....
Tungol, Nikko M. BSAR 1F
Instructor: Sir John Reinjoe Fajardo Namit
The 1935 constitution was unicameral not bicameral
The original 1935 Constitution ay unicameral na National Assemly ang legislature. The Assemblymen's term of office ay 3 years. Ang presidente naman and VP ay 6 years ang term pero one term lang ang presidente hindi pwedeng ma-reelect. Ang SONA ay ginaganap every 4th Monday of January. On June 18, 1940, the 1935 Constitution was amended. Ang term ng presidente at VP ay ginawang 4 years pero pwedeng ma-reelect ng isang beses ang presidente, so total of 8 years. The National Assembly was renamed as House of Representatives and the Assemblymen were then called as Congressmen or Representatives. Their term of office ay ginawang 4 years. Kasama sa amendment ang pagbabalik ng Senado, pero ang election ng Senators ay nationwide na, hindi kagaya sa Jones Law of 1916 na ang mga senador ay ibinoboto per Senatorial District. The first election for the 24 senators under the amended version of the 1935 Constitution ay naganap nuong November 11, 1941 kasabay ng election ng presidente, VP and congressmen. The first 8 senators who obtained the highest number of votes shall serve for 6 years (until December 30, 1947), the second 8 senators who obtained the highest number shall serve for 4 years (until December 30, 1945), and the third 8 senators who obtained the highest number shall serve for 2 years (until December 30, 1943). This means that beginning 1943 and every 2 years thereafter we shall elect 8 senators whose term shall be 6 years. Kasabay sana ng election ng 8 senators on November 9, 1943 ang mga local government officials such as mayors and governors; kaso biglang sumiklab ang WW2. Ang term of office ng mga local government officials during that time ay ginawa ding 4 years from 3 years; so bale pare-parehong 4 years ang term ng presidente, VP, congressmen and local government officials; tanging senators lang ang naiiba ang term which is 6 years. Si President Quezon na-reelect cia during the November 11, 1941 elections pero since he was first elected as president in 1935, he shall only serve until 1943, from there ipapasa na nya sa VP ang pagiging presidente. Hindi nya pwedeng i-serve ang buong term na 4 years (1941-1945) kase lalampas ng 8 years ang total. Eh kaso lahat ng plano nabalewala kase sumiklab ang WW2. Yung term of office ng mga elected officials natin napurnada lahat during that time.
You're wrong, the assassination of ninoy was happen in 1983 and in fact ninoy was branded as a rebel during marcos regime, there's some people of course are angry but not many, it wasn't the cause of the 1986 snap election.
cansteeteshen ?