Great video but could you quieten or take out the background music. It's tricky to focus on your explanations as the music is quite loud and repetitive . Otherwise , great video, thanks
Hi, Could you further explain the answer to question 5? I think I misunderstand the question. Surely by reducing the cut off value of the test then you are increasing the amount of people who will not be captured and still may have the disease (false -ve)?
If the cut off for discharge was 14, and then it was reduced to 12, so someone with 12.01 - 13.99 will be admitted unnecessarily as the sensitivity of the test is increased.
Yet another excellent, succinct presentation that has served as a great revision / resource tool ! Many thanks! Looking forward to the next one :)
You are welcome! Good Luck with your exams!!
Very informative, many thanks for your hard work and passion to teach , bless you
You are very welcome
Great video but could you quieten or take out the background music. It's tricky to focus on your explanations as the music is quite loud and repetitive . Otherwise , great video, thanks
Noted!
Hi, Could you further explain the answer to question 5? I think I misunderstand the question. Surely by reducing the cut off value of the test then you are increasing the amount of people who will not be captured and still may have the disease (false -ve)?
Thank you
You're welcome
Thankyou for the presentation but for SBA5 how do you get 'more' patients when trop decreased from 14 to 12 ?
If the cut off for discharge was 14, and then it was reduced to 12, so someone with 12.01 - 13.99 will be admitted unnecessarily as the sensitivity of the test is increased.
Hey Pankaj, I am working with you now. How fascinating to work with a Consultant colleague who had commented here!!!