Brandan Robertson, Robert Breaker, Gene Kim, and Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ต.ค. 2024
- We have a MAJOR problem. Many Dispensationalists (not all) simply cannot defend the consistency, coherency, and cohesiveness of the scripture. Almost daily, I get emails, private messages, and more about how I don't understand the gospel because I don't accept that Jesus preached a works gospel and that Paul preached the true gospel of grace. I readily get told that Hebrews and James are for Tribulation Jews and not for the Christian Church. I am told that the gospels do not contain a gospel that saves today. Jews have one way of being saved. Gentiles another. There is one gospel for this time period and another gospel for this other dispensation, and yet another gospel for this time yet to come. It is frustrating on so many levels.
Some time back, I did a video titled, "What Good is a Perfect Bible if You Have Horrible Theology?" These guys will fight to the death in defense of the King James Version and tell everyone they know that one must rightly divide the word of truth, only to butcher the gospel. There is a pox on the Christian church today. There is a cancer within Fundamentalism. I wish I could say that it could be limited to Mid-Acts Dispensationalism, but it cannot. Many Dispensationalists proclaim Mid-Acts Dispensationalism and then deny that they do so. But, they still divide the gospel.
There are several popular IFB Internet preachers espousing this heresy of multiple gospels. They will tell you that people were saved by works at one point in the past. Then there was a time when people were saved by faith+works. Now, one can only be saved by Paul's gospel (not Jesus'), and during the Great Tribulation, works will once again be required for people to be saved.
CONTACT INFORMATION:
DONATE: forthemaster.o... or www.buymeacoff...
WEBSITE: jonathanburris...
PODCAST: podcasters.spo...
FACEBOOK: / dr.jonathan.burris
TWITTER: / thepastorburris
EMAIL: drburris@icloud.com
We are save Forever by faith Alone in Crist
Save by the perfect blood of Jesus
No needed dead works
Jesus paid All our debt
That is what Paul
Preached !
@@douggauzy6258 That is what ALL of the apostles preached.
Do you know what the Ministry of reconciliation means?
It takes two for the process of reconciliation. God made the first step: He reconciled himself to the world. He would never reconcile himself to sin. So what did He do?
Christ paid the price for the sins of the whole world. That was the necessary atonement, directly followed by God forgiving the world all trespasses.
Today, sin is not imputed to anyone, ALL sin was put on Christ, buried with him. When Christ rose again, all sin stayed in his grave and is not ever to be re-imputed to anyone in this dispensation of Grace.
That's our good news of today the Gospel of our salvation: the work was finished on the cross, once and for all. Now sin is put out of the way between God and man. Hallelujah 🙏🙏🙏
Now it's your turn: be ye reconciled to God. Believe that all your sins were forgiven by God when Christ paid the price for every single sin.
This is salvation today: believe, your sins were completely forgiven on the cross when you were His enemy,as the sins of the whole world were paid and forgiven there.
Believing that, trusting in Christ alone is what saves you today. In this very moment, Christ's righteousness is imputed in your account, by His spirit you are baptized into Christ, sealed with the Holy Spirit until the day of redemption, eternal life and all spiritual blessings are yours, you are a new creature, a member of the church, the Body of Christ, your Destination is heavenly places.
Paul, our only apostle,did not say one single word in all his 13 epistles how to get your sins forgiven. Because salvation is to believe they already are.
This is our ministry, Ambassadors for Christ, ministers of reconciliation. Share the good news that God has forgiven all the worlds sin and is not imputing them, today is the day of salvation!
Grace and peace 🙏 ❤️
Check out also "truthtime Radio", it is very edifying ❤️
Peter did too acts 10 and it’s pictured all through the Bible. Cain brought his own works as an offering Abel brought a sacrifice God hate’s cains offering this has always been if it’s never been about our own works NEVER
OK why is Kim wrong?
Pual makes it clear we 😢are saved by faith alone.
James makes it clear salvation is not by faith alone, but by works and faith.
It’s literally right there in the Bible .
How do you explain this apparent contradiction?
Kim has an answer that makes sense to me . I’m not a radical. The reading of the text is clear. James a Jew is writing a letter to Jews. Literally in James the first verse. He’s states he is writing a letter to the 12 tribes of Israel. I think that’s relevant. He’s not writing to the gentile church. James is being consistent with what Jesus preached and told him to do. Jesus told the apostles to go to Jerusalem, then Judah, and then Samaria and the outer parts of the world.
Just like, when Jesus said, I did not come, but for the house of Isreal . Jesus made it clear that he did not come for gentiles, but only for the Jews.
What’s the problem? Pastor give us your explanation of this contradiction.
Don’t give me your a claim Kim is wrong. Why is Kim wrong?
What did James mean?
Robert is right and Gene. 2 Tim 2:15
It is because of a doctrine that is found only in the King James Bible 2 Timothy 2:15 Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth. Also connected to another Doctrine found in Ephesians 3:2. If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me (Paul) to you-ward.
This is the dispensation of GRACE SALVATION BY FAITH ALONE IN THE FINISHED WORK OF THE SACRIFICIAL DEATH OF OUR SAVIOR JESUS CHRIST ON THE CROSS. THAT JESUS DIED ON THR CROSS FOR OUR SINS, HIS BLOOD PAID FOR OUR SINS. HE WAS BURIED AND ROSE FROM THE DEAD ON THE THIRD DAY FOR OUR JUSTIFICATION.
WHEN WE PLACE ALL OUR FAITH ON HIM AND WHAT HE DID WE ARE SAVED.
Paul was annointed by Jesus Christ to be the apostle to the gentiles Acts 9:15. His wrote Romans to Philemon and these books are the instructions of Jesus Christ to Paul to be followed by the gentiles.
LOOK FOR A CHANNEL CALLED
" RIGHTLY DIVIDING THE WORD" BY PAUL FELTER. MY CONFUSION WAS RESOLVED.
Because if we truly are saved, by faith in grace alone (which we are), then a heart transformation occurs. So we show our faith by our works.
Though they (salvation and sanctification) are two separate phases in a Christian’s walk, they must be connected or the transformation whether real or not is questionable.
One emphasizes faith alone in grace (salvation), the other emphasizes faith and works (salvation that leads to one dying daily to self thus Jesus living in and through the Christian and brings forth good works).
If Jesus is in us, good works must come forth.
@@Darlenejoy how much work ? How much fruit? Who will be the judge? Were we told to judge bretheren by our individual standards? I dont condone sinning. I hate it. We still occupy this fallen flesh till redemption by death or the rapture (which is a mystery)
Upon salvation, Ephesians 1:13-14, states you are sealed with the Holy Spirt till the day of redemption. Where would you find these doctrines but from the Pauline epistles. And as a believer, we ought to pray for one another. We study the Bible rightly divided 2 Timothy 2:15 to be an approved workman unto God. The answers to your concerns should be found in the Scriptures.
Robert Breaker and Gene Kim are reading their Bible.
" They teach the right doctrine"
I am saved by the precious BLOOD of JESUS CHRIST.
🐑 We are bible believers - no one can change it.
But they teach that not everyone is saved by the blood of Christ. They teach some people are saved by works.
@@pastorburris Yes, but those people who are left behind of the Rapture, they are saved by works + faith. Those are the Tribulation Saints. Their gospel is called: "Everlasting Gospel."
@@pastorburris Wrong wrong Pastor Breaker has never said that.
@@henamuriel No one can be saved by their own works involved. Wrong soteriology.
Brandan Robertson must be reading a different Bible than me... He said "Paul never met Jesus"... Did he not read what happened to Paul, that converted him from killing Christians to becoming Christian??? Meeting Jesus is what converted Paul, and Jesus is the very One who started Paul on his mission in the first place...
It is written:
Acts 9:3-6 NIV:
3 As he neared Damascus on his journey, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him.
4 He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?”
5 “Who are you, Lord?” Saul asked. “I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting,” he replied.
6 “Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.”
CSB:
3 As he traveled and was nearing Damascus, a light from heaven suddenly flashed around him. 4 Falling to the ground, he heard a voice saying to him, “Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?”
5 “Who are you, Lord?” Saul said. “I am Jesus, the one you are persecuting,” he replied.
6 “But get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.”
King James Version(For those who would discredit the more readable version above):
3 And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:
4 And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
5 And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And the Lord said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
6 And he trembling and astonished said, Lord, what wilt thou have me to do? And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do.
notice there are some words missing
@@GodisGracious1031MinistriesI noticed some words added in the KJV. But then the KJV has many added uninspired words. Because it came from later manuscripts dedicated to the Pope with so many words added by uninspired scribes.
@@Sam-tk6us The latter is not true.
@@GodisGracious1031Ministries Very very true. So many added uninspired verses in the imperfect uninspired KJV. Because the translators used much later manuscripts dedicated to the Pope with so many added uninspired verses. . Also the translators leant heavily on the Latin Vulgate showing the Catholic influence on the KJV. Nothing perfect about the KJV no matter what the fantasies the KJV only cult may teach.
@@Sam-tk6us No sir, the King James and his translators were against the poppish Roman Catholics. They removed the Acryophal and used the preserved text. the New Bibles use the manuscripts dedicated to the Pope. What uninspired verses?
Dispensations should not be that hard to understand.
That's why God said you gotta "STUDY" .....to show yourself APPROVED. 😉
2 Timothy 2:15
@@KingjamesAV1611 Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth. But avoid irreverent babble, for it will lead people into more and more ungodliness, and their talk will spread like gangrene.
@@docbrown7513 My bible, a king James version, says “rightly DIVIDING”. It appears your version says rightly handling. There’s a significant hermeneutical difference between those two words.
@@pjsepulvedHope you are not straining out gnats and swallowing camels.
@@docbrown7513please stop reading a Bible that the devil and man has corrupted and get you a KJV Bible
Paul was endorsed by three who walked with Jesus. He preached the same Gospel as they did: "And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision." (Ga. 2:9)
”For God, who was at work in Peter as an apostle to the circumcised, was also at work in me as an apostle to the Gentiles. James, Cephas and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the circumcised.“
Galatians 2:8-9 NIV
”For God, who was at work in Peter as an apostle to the circumcised, was also at work in me as an apostle to the Gentiles. James, Cephas and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the circumcised.“
Galatians 2:8-9 NIV
”For God, who was at work in Peter as an apostle to the circumcised, was also at work in me as an apostle to the Gentiles. James, Cephas and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the circumcised.“
Galatians 2:8-9 NIV
”For God, who was at work in Peter as an apostle to the circumcised, was also at work in me as an apostle to the Gentiles. James, Cephas and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the circumcised.“
Galatians 2:8-9 NIV
No...
"If your theology isn't consistent, it isn't biblical theology." Well said. We should all be striving for consistency.
Can a persons name theology be consistently wrong? Of course they can. But Because they’re consistent their biblical?
A persons theology is correct if it is correct. In first Timothy, apostle, Paul says we must rightly divide the word of truth.
@pjsepulved You're right. The Bible is consistent. If my thoughts about it are inconsistent, then my thoughts are wrong and I must go back to the Bible to square up the inconsistencies.
Yes consistency is key. James (written to Israel. James 1:1) 2:24 is not consistent with Paul (written to all that be in Rome: the Body of Christ Church) Romans 3:28.
Israel's doctrine is according to their 70 weeks prophecy. Paul's doctrine for the Body of Christ is not according to prophecy, but according to the mysteries revealed to him, that were hidden since the world began.
You gotta rightly divide the Word of Truth between what is meant for Israel and what is meant for the Body of Christ Church. Otherwise, confusion is the only possible outcome.
@bugsocsollie1694 James is consistent with Paul. James is talking about the nature of true faith using Abraham (prior to the nation of Israel, prior to the Law) being evident by works, vs 20, Abraham offered up Jacob AFTER his belief was reckoned as righteousness vs 21. Just like Rahab hid the messengers after she believed, vs 25, a faith that does not produce works is as dead as a body without a spirit and is not a justifying faith at all, vs 26. Paul certainly does not preach a justification by faith alone that does not produce works, Rom 6.
@@Puhleeeez Ya see? This is the kind of confusion you get when you mix Israel's last days doctrine with the doctrine for the Body of Christ Church.
We are justified by faith. Romans 5:1. Paul didn't add anything to that. You add it, to make it fit what James told Israel.
Israel is not God's people today, because they rejected their Messiah and their kingdom. They fell and they are diminished (Romans 11:11-12). When God calls out to them again, it will be too late for them to be saved by Grace through faith. They will have to endure their 70th week of their prophecy to be saved. And they better not take the Mark of the Beast. 1 John 5:16
Israel will be tried and tested like Gold in a furnace, because they rejected their Messiah. Only a remnant of them will be saved. Yes, their works matter very much. They will be saved by faith plus works.
The Body of Christ Church is saved by Grace through faith. If by Grace it can not be of works. And of works, it can not be of Grace. Romans 11:6
Today, Israel's doctrine is not valid. Mixing Their doctrine with our doctrine gives another Gospel that can not save anyone.
Paul's Gospel is the only Gospel that is the Power of God unto salvation for anyone THAT BELIEVES IT. Notice that Paul didn't add anything to that "believes it" part. Faith alone for salvation, but only for the Body of Christ Church. Not for Israel, once they're called out again by God.
"Rightly Dividing" is understanding the difference between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary.
Who is now the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart.
Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36)
We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
The passage you are using DOES NOT address or mention a difference between Old and New Covenants at all. In fact, it isn't mentioned ANYWHERE in the context of that passage. The text is specifically instructing Timothy, a pastor, not to engage in disputes over matters that are insignificant, irreverent, teach erroneous things, and that cause division and harm to the body of Christ, specifically about the resurrection of the dead. Here's the context:
"Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers. 15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 16 But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. 17 And their word will eat as doth a canker:" (KJV)
"Remind them of these things, and charge them before God not to quarrel about words, which does no good, but only ruins the hearers. 15 Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth. 16 But avoid irreverent babble, for it will lead people into more and more ungodliness, 17 and their talk will spread like gangrene." (ESV)
Paul then names two individuals who were violating this principle of causing dissension about the resurrection of the dead (Hymenaeus and Philetus) and promoting an error within the body of Christ.
So your point isn't mentioned ANYWHERE in this text as being applicable to one's view of Old vs. New Covenants. The Godhead is ONE and united. The Bible is the written revelation of that Triune God, yet ONE God. The scripture is united as the Father, Christ, and the Holy Spirit are united in one God, in essense. Dividing the word of God comes from the natural man because our brains like to categorize things into groups in order to understand and help remember them. While this is a good thing when aiding in memorization of scripture, we cannot ignore that ALL scripture, Old and New Covenants are intertwined and mesh in unity with each other. They are not contradictory to one another, but unified.
Please don't take my comments to be a personal attack. As one Christian to another, I'm only asking, in love, for your benefit and growth in Christ, that you examine the text carefully and consider that it might be possible that standard dispensationalism view of scripture may actually do harm to the unity of scripture. The written Word of God is a mirror of THE Word of God, Jesus Christ. From Gen 1 to the last verse of Revelation 22, it reveals the Person and Work of Christ, The Father, and the Holy Spirit. The Bible is ONE as God is ONE because the purpose of it is to reveal God to fallen man. It must reflect the very character of God and essense of who He is, in order to reveal Him properly.
May the Grace and peace of God be with you and may He bless you as you study this issue prayerfully. May His richest blessings be upon you and your family.
No the mystery was given to Paul grace. And Peter and Paul agreed in a room that Paul was right for Peter had the dream.
What mystery ? Peter was the first one to tell us it’s faith without works acts 10
The problem you’ll run into is: 1. You have to explain the book of James outside of Dispensationalism, or you’ll be at risk of running into a theology that’s more aligned with the Roman Catholic Church. 2. You have to be able to explain clear differences in between Jesus coming to the Jews and the change that took place in Acts. 3. You have to be able to explain all the passages outside of James and the books of Paul that discuss works. 4. You run the risk of leaving people at a place of loss and confusion when you “debunk” or cast doubt on Dispensationalism without explaining what the alternative is.
Dispensationalism didn’t come into existence until 1830’s. Christians had answers to these questions for millennia. Read Matthew Henry for example.
@@classicchristianliterature most Christian’s that I’ve run into that quote Matthew and Henry also believe in Replacement Theology.
@@marcwhite9234 what you label as replacement theology is what Jesus and the apostles taught. A small sampling of Scripture proves this. Jews and dispensationalists may be waiting for a temple, but Scripture says that Jesus body is the temple. The church as His body is being built today as living stones for a habitation of the Spirit. Jews and dispensationalists may be waiting for a restored nation of Israel, but Scripture teaches that Christ has made a people who were no people, a holy nation - the church made of Jew and Gentile. I could go on, dispensationalism is wrong and no one believed the things that JN Darby, CI Scofield, LS Chafer taught for 1850-1900 years of church history. We are Christians. We have no place for a religion that excludes Christ. Those who fail to see prophecy fulfilled in Christ are functionally Jewish and functionally anti-Christ.
Matthew 21:42-45 KJV
Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? [43] Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. [44] And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder. [45] And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.
Hosea 11:1 KJV
When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt.
Matthew 2:14-15 KJV
When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt: [15] And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.
2 Corinthians 1:20 KJV
For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us.
Galatians 3:16,26,29 KJV
Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. [26] For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. [29] And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
Ephesians 2:12-13,19-22 KJV
That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: [13] But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. [19] Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God; [20] And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone ; [21] In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: [22] In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.
@@classicchristianliterature Romans 11:29, the gifts and promises of God are irrevocable. So if Israel has been replaced, God becomes a liar.
@@marcwhite9234 you didn’t read any thing I wrote. Romans 11:29 is fulfilled by grafting of the believing gentiles into 1 olive tree. “And in this way…. All Israel will be saved”. It’s not a replacement, God doesn’t chop down the old olive tree and plant a new one. But he expands Israel and fulfills its purpose through Christ.
Brandon Robertson speaking at 10:17-24: "Paul never met Jesus, never heard Jesus preach. Paul only knows Jesus through second-hand knowledge."
Response: You would think that with his theology degrees Brandon might be familiar with these three passages from the Acts of the Apostles:
1. Acts 9:3-6 (KJV): And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven: And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, "Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?" And he said, "Who art thou, Lord?" And the Lord said, "I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks." And he trembling and astonished said, "Lord, what wilt thou have me to do?" And the Lord said unto him, "Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do."
2. Acts 22:17-21 (KJV): And it came to pass, that, when I was come again to Jerusalem, even while I prayed in the temple, I was in a trance; And saw Him saying unto me, "Make haste, and get thee quickly out of Jerusalem: for they will not receive thy testimony concerning Me." And I said, "Lord, they know that I imprisoned and beat in every synagogue them that believed on Thee: And when the blood of thy martyr Stephen was shed, I also was standing by, and consenting unto his death, and kept the raiment of them that slew him." And He said unto me, "Depart: for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles. "
3. Acts 23:11 (KJV): And the night following the Lord stood by him, and said, "Be of good cheer, Paul: for as thou hast testified of Me in Jerusalem, so must thou bear witness also at Rome."
Paul did meet Jesus on the road to Damascus where he was commissioned to preach grace to the Gentiles (Eph 3:1-3; Acts 22:21). Paul had direct revelation from Christ: Gal 1:11-12 (NIV): I want you to know, brothers and sisters, that the gospel I preached is not of human origin. I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.
@@benanderson4118 yea its I think
also in the book of Acts. I love Paul. Cant wait to chat with him
If we do not rightly divide, we will not understand the Bible correctly. See 2nd Tim. 2, 15. God talks to different people groups in a different manner. Yes, He is the same yesterday, today and forever. Hebrews, 13,8. His character never changes. That's what we have to consider. And He is Lord, and that's the way He made it up.
But he never saved anyone based totally or even partially on their works.
@@pastorburrisso the people who lived under Moses’s covenant did all their silly little rituals for nothing right? It totally wasn’t because god called them to keep the covenant lest they should be saved right? That’s WORKS and it’s a WORKS GOSPEL dispensed to Mose and his people. How can you call yourself a pastor with a straight face, while also denying that there were indeed people in the Bible saved by their works? How are you gonna say with a straight face that dispensationalists don’t know hebrews? Brother, all through out hebrews it details the differences between the old covenant and new. It’s a book of DISPENSATION for crying out loud it explains it quite well if you’d give it a read sometime.
Blasphemy! I need you to tell my why you support the false teaching of Breaker when Romans 3:10-24 clearly teaches that no one has ever been saved by works of righteousness or obedience to the Law. Tell me why these verses do not apply to Jesus’ day or David’s day or Isaiah’s day. I beg you to answer that question.
@@pastorburris Sometimes they can't answer as they don't have ANY scripture to correctly back up what they say so they just disappear in a puff of smoke.
@@pastorburris Clearly, he can't answer that. This is what they do, when they know they have been proved wrong by the word of God, they disappear.
I used to be a dispensationalist. But as I studied more it became clear that the whole system is applied ad hoc. It’s a template placed on top of scripture that cannot itself be found in scripture.
Very well said. I spent time in a KJVOnly environment in my youth. I don't remember it being as mean or as overt as it is since the advent of social media.
Social media, and the internet in general, have been a tremendous detriment to civil discourse.
@@notsatch While there are good aspects to the internet, most of it is trash.
Our neighbor when I was a kid was a Dispensational, KJVO preacher. He was legalistic. But he would have given the shirt off his back to anyone in need. He voluntarily plowed people’s driveways in the winter during snow storms, he voluntarily hayed people’s fields (he had all the equipment), and he stopped by and visited with all his neighbors. He never asked for anything in return. He would have been horrified by Gene Kim types. I’m afraid that his brand of old school Dispensational, KJVO preachers is virtually gone.
@@reformedpilgrim I was a member of a KJVO/IFB/DISPY Baptist church for 16 years, 12 of which I wasn't even saved. The pastor and most of the congregation & visiting preachers we had are just like you described. Very legalistic, often judgmental, but in many ways very kind. They did have a great zeal for God, but not really according to knowledge. I am so thankful that the Lord saved me in spite of their Arminian, legalistic gospel, but He got me out of there. About a year later I joined a Presbyterian church and learned all about the doctrines of grace and about the errors of dispensationalism. I have never looked back.
I can tell you for a fact that Robert breaker does not get anything from the Scofield study Bible. He does read only from the King James Bible
Breaker is a Ruckmanite. He got his false doctrine of different ways of salvation in different time periods from Peter Ruckman. That cursing preacher was as full of false teaching as he was anger and bitterness.
You are saved by grace through faith and not of works less anyone should boast
That is correct. So were people in the Old Testament and in Jesus’ day. And that is how people will be saved during the Tribulation years. There is only ONE gospel.
@@pastorburris Circumcision is a work! Keeping the law is work!
Sounds like this guy needs to learn how to rightfully divide,do you ever study the Bible pastor?
Wow, what a powerful refutation. The only thing you are missing is facts and logic. Other than that, it’s an amazing comment.
🗨 Perry 🗨 Breaker wrongly divided his brain. Some brain nerves got severed in the process. Hope for recovery is usually slim. Brain damage can be a serious thing, didn't you know?
@@rayhchc6451This is ad hominem and has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
Keep it coming! Solid truth and biblically sound. Thanks!
Agree with you Pastor. It is the same gospel that Jesus preached that Paul preached. I am a dispensationalist but I believe in the scarlet thread of redemption from Genesis 1 to Revelation 22. James is about the authenticity of faith. Hebrews is about Jesus as a Priest forever is far better than the Levitical priesthood. Its still the gospel by faith in the atoning sacrifice of the blood of Jesus. You my brother are exposing heresy. Blessings!
rodneyjackson6181 Amen, Brother! I was with another preacher & friend of mine a while back at a service where Dr. Dennis Corle was preaching in a morning meeting for men.
After the preaching, Dr. Corle opened the floor to answer Bible questions from the men. My friend asked him his position on Didpensationalism. Dr. Corle stated that although he did believe that God dealt in different periods with people in unique ways, due to whether the Mosaic Law was in effect whether they were Jees or Gentiles, etc, he did not consider himself a STRICT Dispensationalist. He went on to state that to follow Dispensationalism too closely & paint it with a "broad brush" would be to put God in a box & say he can't or won't do so.ething in a given situation & that the system itself has a tedancy to limit God.
I found nothing wrong with Dr. Corle"s answer, although there are other areas I have disagreed with him on. But chalked it up & moved on.
My friend did not take the time to dispute with him during that time, but did tell me afterwards that he would probably not ever attend another meeting there, due to the HERESY being espoused there!
Since that time, I have watched his deep ascent into Ruckmanism. He had personality tendencies that leaned toward harshness when it comes to doctrinal matters anyway. So, that didn't totally surprise me.
I have used a Schofield Bible in my preaching & study, as my first psstor did, as well as many men I have fellowshiped with & preached with. I have, however used it CAUTIOUSLY! In doing so, I have found places where I believe the Dispensational teaching he does, as well as other subjects he deals with in his notes are in error.
Oh, that we who profess to be Bible believers would commit to follow the Scripture more than a system!
@@elbertsorrell8394 Amen!! Appreciate your comments!!
gospel by faith in the atoning sacrifice of the blood of Jesus before Jesus went to the cross?
@@wannabewoodworker9705 sir, the Word says Jesus was slain before the foundation of the world. The blood sacrifice of animals were a shadow of the things to come. Just like the Passover in Egypt?, when the angel saw the blood he would Passover the house. Without the shedding of blood there is no remission of sins. John saw Jesus and said, "Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world." Yes to your question. Was Old Testament saints saved? How could they be according to your question. By believing in the coming Messiah who would shed His blood for their sins.
This is a new teaching for me I am exploring.
I could see that about John the Baptist quote.
Why then did Peter try to stop Jesus from going to the cross? Seems odd in light of this teaching
KJV Study. 2 Timothy 4:3-4
[3]For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
[4]And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
If this is your way of saying he's in the wrong, I agree.
without change are you truly repentant? that is the real question. it is by grace through faith that we are saved, but faith without works is dead. it is never ok to sin. works for salvation, no. salvation producing works, yes.
Agreed
This is kind of the crux of it right? How does one know that they are saved? This is where many works based theories get their start. Without works how do you know if someone is saved because people always quote, “by their fruits you will know them.”
The Bible clearly outlines salvation in multiple passages, and Ephesians makes it clear it is not of works. I believe our answer lies in Romans 10:9-10 and 2 Corinthians 4:13-ff. When you take the fact that Paul outlined in 2 Corinthians that first he believed then he spoke. So belief unto salvation came first, and then the work of speaking (the work) came second. Romans 10:9-10 appears to outline this same process.
@@pastorburris have you read James - it’s to the 12 Tribes , is the Bible lying just to appease you ?
If you are born of God, having God DNA , can that DNA disappear, just like you have your parent DNA 🤔
I talked to my pastor, he said people like John MacArthur are dispensationalists, so he doesn't think all are hyper. But I appreciate this video.
I hold to similar views as MacArthur. I agree, not all are hyper. The problem today is the lines are so blurred.
@@pastorburris Thanks to the work of the devil and his servants, yes, the boundaries have been very blurred.
Dr. James White addressed Braden Patterson on the Dividing Line yesterday. Great video brother, I'm having to wash myself of a lot of my Scofield's influences on my life. I love the chain references in it and the concordance and dictionary are excellent, but those notes man. Great video bro, keep up the good work.
Yes saw that one too. Frankly, I’ve had about enough of Brandon for the foreseeable future.
@@brothermike434 little dab will do ya, kind of like sewage 🤮
@@jerem0621 you know, God in His glorious grace could save Brandon and it would be a wonderful testimony. But he keeps getting further and further from the Truth. Right now, he’s barely a floater.
Yeah, Paul told us in the last days many will depart from the faith, and from sound doctrine.
@@bugsocsollie1694 I’m old enough to remember having to search for things in order to expose them. No searching needed anymore! It’s mostly right in our faces, blatant and without fear of the coming wrath. To God be the glory!
I’ve read/heard how much Scofield have corrupted the meaning of God’s people
Keep up the good work. I have had to try and correct this bad theology among those in my circles. Paul quotes Habakkuk 2:4 in Romans 1:16, i.e., 'the just shall live by faith'. Salvation has always been by grace through faith - for all time. The reason why the Apostles had to stay in Jerusalem unlike Paul, a Roman citizen, was free to travel, the Jews were political prisoners of the Rome. I don't know why so many like this theology, I can only think it's sheer laziness in studying the Word of God. You're right, they are radical.
Amen! Thank you so much for addressing this issue. Dispensationalism has become a curse on modern fundamental/evangelical Christianity.
A curse? I’m a dispensationlist. And finally the Bible makes sense.
If you’re so sure that it’s a curse, then please do me a favor and explain what James means when he says, faith without works is dead. Please help free me from the curse.
@@pjsepulvedI am also a "dispensationist" because there are dispensations in the Bible.. and we are told to rightly divide (2Tim2:15) not sure how one could say "there is no such thing as Jew and Gentile" or "no such thing as Old and New Testaments" because they are clearly in the correct Bible.
Dispensations is also HOW the Bible makes sense and does not "contradict" itself. I have been a Christian for a long time & as soon as I was called back into deep diving within the past three years, God has led me to Dispensational truth (also a book by this title by Clarence Larkin) so therefore I know in my spirit that this is the correct way to interpret scripture.
It's so important to use your common sense as well, don't you want to make sure you're reading the actual ancient scriptures correctly translated into English if Jesus attributes "every jot and tiddle" to be significant?
Being a dispensationalist is just another title for "reading the Bible the way it was intended to be read" and following what the correct scriptures say to do. If we all do this using correct scripture then there wouldn't be different denominations, preterest viewpoints set up by Jesuit priests of the roman catholic abomination, etc. Everything fits together like a masterpiece that only God could put together and "no scripture is of any private interpretation."
Just a side note: I know much of the older crowd were warning about the new modern bibles way back in the 50s as they change, add & omit words, verses & meanings! It's no secret, go to the store or order a few different "translations" and you'll see for yourself.
This video is a shame as it seeks to make war where answers can be found. This video just makes me sad because within the first minute, this man has already assumed and has done so wrongfully to his detriment only showing well learned people that he, himself needs to read the correct scriptures and rightly divide them. I will pray for this man to put his time and energy into study of the word rather than making mudslinging yourube videos against fellow Christians.
Faith in the blood of Jesus is the only thing that saves both Jew and Gentile alike within our current age of grace.
❤️✝️❤️
@@pjsepulved is Jude written to me? Or is it for someone else?
When I saw this earlier, I thought it was gonna be one of those 'click bait' titles, or, judging by the thumbnail, the video's content was gonna be 'bad mouthing' those 3 pastors and saying they're wrong.
And I turned out to be right, it's the latter.
Of the 3, Robert Breaker is the only one I'm familiar with. I've seen many of his video sermons. Some more than once, like 2 or 3 times. There are a few things he mentions and talks about that I don't quite agree with, but overall, he reads the Bible and teaches it to the best of his ability.
You say that rightly dividing the word of truth, and teaching dispensations is wrong, however are you aware that the Bible literally tells us to rightly divide? It's II Timothy 2:15.
"Study to show yourself approved unto God, a workman that needs not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth."
And if you look at the verse after it, there's a warning.
"But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness."
Now, in regards to Jesus and Paul preaching 2 different gospels, they are.
- Look at Jesus' earthly ministry. He preached the Gospel of the Kingdom, using the phrase "the kingdom of heaven is like..." And not once during His earthly ministry did He mention the Blood Atonement. (obviously because, during that time, the death, burial and resurrection hadn't happened yet)
- Then look at Paul's ministry. He preached the Blood Atonement. You can find the gospel he preached in I Corinthians 15:1 - 4.
"Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also you have received, and wherein you stand; By which also you are saved, if you keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless you have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures."
- If Jesus preached the gospel of the kingdom and Paul preached the gospel of the blood atonement, then they did preach 2 different gospel messages.
And regarding the epistles of Paul being for the church and Hebrews through Revelation being for the Jews in the Tribulation, again, they are.
- In Romans 11:13, Paul says this: "For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:" And look at the books of Romans all the way to Philemon, every single one starts with the same word. Paul, indicating that he's speaking to the Gentiles, which is us. (and Gentiles make up a majority of the church)
- And if you look at the book of James, as well as the books of I and II Peter, they're writing to a Jewish audience.
James 1:1 "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting."
I Peter 1:1 "Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,"
II Peter 1:1 "Simon Peter, a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ, to them that have obtained like precious faith with us through the righteousness of God and our Saviour Jesus Christ:"
The 12 tribes and strangers who are scattered are the Jewish people of Israel
- If Paul is the apostle to the Gentiles, which is us, the church and Hebrews through Revelation, or some therein, are addressed to the Jews of Israel, then they are writing to different audiences.
These are just 2 examples, but there are more. So whether people believe it or not, rightly dividing is a legitimate practice.
All I'm saying is, if a pastor reads the Bible and teaches on something that you don't agree with, maybe don't be so quick as to call them a 'false teacher'.
My dad did that. He called Robert a "false prophet" one time, simply because he didn't agree with something. But then he turned around a few seconds later, making a total 180, and said that most of what he says is dead on.
I have videos on my channel already refuting Breaker’s teaching on the Kingdom of Heaven. I have a video coming out this week refuting their position on James. Yes, we are told to rightly divide the word of truth. What these men do is not that.
@@pastorburris I think it is, but I guess that's just a matter of opinion.
I may see about watching those videos you mentioned, at least to see what you say about it.
Have you seen the video about rightly dividing 'explained correctly' on Scott Clarke's channel?
I you may not agree with them either, but then again you may find it enlightening.
Just a suggestion, of course.
I’ve watched dozens of hours from guys like these.
@@johnfanortney7535 sure thing.
After he replied to my reply, I figured that he was pretty much mindset in his thinking, so I decided to 'end it' there.
And as I was typing out my first comment, I actually looked those verses up so I could quote them word for word.
I did make a few small changes, like changing thyself to yourself, but other than that...
Booyah! 🎯
Thank you for uncovering the lies that these men are teaching.
It's disturbing how even among those who don't teach this heresy, they still praise and exalt these false teachers as sound men because they're "KJV man." While they slander and reject much more Biblical men because they're involved with the "modern perversions." It's cultic, and sad.
Amen brother. The LORD bless you for speaking the truth.
Preachers have made salvation more complicated than a Rubik's Cube, yet (Matthew 18: 3,4) says salvation is so simple a child can grasp it.
I ditched depensationlism years ago and went through Scripture with different eyes. It was Larkin and his talent for charts that led the Baptist into that doctrine. I understand how the Pentecostals got there considering the background of Darby.
Robert breaker preaches Grace by Faith alone. I don't think you have watched very many of Robert breakers videos. But you are right about one thing there is a problem with some people on the internet saying things that are not accurate. I think you should put yourself in that category. You're trying to group all these people in one category instead of being clear about each one and their particular teachings. I have watched a lot of Robert breakers videos and I can tell you that he backs up everything with the Bible and reads the verses directly from the Bible as he's teaching. The thing that is wrong with the Internet now is people like you. I think you should seriously think about deleting your videos because you are drawing people away from their only source of preaching.
Actually, I have watched way more Robert Breaker videos than I ever wanted. Robert Breaker does preach salvation by grace NOW. But, he teaches that Jesus preached salvation by faith plus works. And that is blasphemy. No one has ever been saved by faith plus works. Because of this, Breaker is a heretic who teaches false doctrine. Romans 3:10-24 says that no one is saved by works of righteousness or obedience to the Law. Do you really want to tell me that that did not apply when Jesus was preaching? Did that not apply to David’s day? Did that not apply to Isaiah’s day? If not, why not?
Yes yes we all know that salvation is Grace by faith, and that includes Robert Breaker, Please quote the video that you are referring to, and Robert Breaker is Not a heretic.
I used to be dispensational and watched just about every breaker video. He has a video called dispensations in the Bible or something like that where he explains salvation being different. He has multiple videos on this topic. Please tread carefully yes he knows it’s salvation today but he believes it was works in the OT and will be works in the tribulation
When someone starts their thesis, 'if you don't believe it this way you are ignorant', it is a good sign they can't defend their thesis and are defending their position as the authority. What is plain, requires no explanation, and what is implied requires reason, and where there is no bridge requires overwhelming force.
Yup, I left the IFB several years ago. I believe in the fundamentals of the Word of God. I do not support the so-called "Fundamentalist Movement".
You have to rightly divide otherwise you will be building arks, sacrificing animals, and slaying giants. Its the same way with the new testament. Jesus came only to 12 tribes of Israel... without Paul we would have never received the Gospel. Peter was going to the Jews and continued in the Law of Moses. Paul had to come and correct that and Peter agreed with him that Salvation is not of works and is also for everyone not just Jews. Nobody is saying we shouldnt obey Jesus and we can sin as much as we want. We are just simply saying Salvation is by Grace through Faith. Simply believe in the blood that was shed for the sins of the world. Accept the free Gift of God. After Salvation of Grace then the Holy Spirit will lead you to every good work.
Do you believe Romans 3:10-24 was true when it was written? It is a serious question. Please read it and refresh your memory of your need to. This is where Paul says no one is justified by works of righteousness or obedience to the Law. Was this true when it was written?
@@pastorburris maybe im not understanding what you are saying. Are you saying that we are justified by grace through faith alone or faith plus works??? I believe the same as Robert Breaker that its Grace by faith in the blood of Jesus alone to be saved.
AMEN. @@Tombot67
Breaker is the one who says that Jesus preached a different gospel than Paul. That is blasphemy. No one has ever been saved by faith+works. Never. I need you to tell my why you support the false teaching of Breaker when Romans 3:10-24 clearly teaches that no one has ever been saved by works of righteousness or obedience to the Law. Tell me why these verses do not apply to Jesus’ day or David’s day or Isaiah’s day. I beg you to answer that question.
@@pastorburris i watch Breaker weekly... he always says until Jesus death at the cross everyone was still under the Law. It wasnt until the shedding of blood at the cross that we are saved by Grace. But there are 7-8 different dispensations in the bible. I dont know what the big deal is if he is saying that today we are saved by Grace through faith through the finished works of Jesus Christ our Lord and Savior.
Wrongly dividing the Word = Dispensationalism = 🔥💀🔥💀🔥
Can the doctrine in James 2:21-24 be used for the Church?
Romans 4:3-11 For what saith the scripture? *Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. 4Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. 5But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.* 6Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works, 7Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. 8Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. 9Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, *or upon the uncircumcision also?* for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. *10How was it then reckoned?* when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? *Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.* 11And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:
James 2:21-24 *Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?* *22Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?* 23And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. *24Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.*
Paul uses Genesis 15:5-6 for Abraham's Justification by faith. Abram was a GENTILE, his name had not been changed to Abraham yet. He was not circumcised until Genesis 17:10. Paul tells us Abraham was Justified in UNCIRCUMCISION as a gentile.
And he brought him forth abroad, and said, *Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be. 6And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.*
James is written to: James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the *twelve tribes which are scattered abroad,* greeting. (1:1)
Abraham was Justified by faith AND works as the first Jew AFTER circumcision. Paul tells us there are three divisions of man today:
1 Cor. 10:32 Give none offence, neither to the *Jews,* nor to the *Gentiles,* nor to the *church of God:*
While there is some doctrine applicable to the Church in James' epistle it is addressed to the Twelve Tribes. Either you are a lost Jew, a lost gentile, or you are a saved man in the Body of Christ/the Church. Hebrews is also addressed to the Hebrews. Notice that the promise in Genesis 15 is that Abraham's seed was to be as the stars.
In Genesis 22: That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, *and as the sand which is upon the sea shore;* and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies; The promise is expanded from the stars to include the sand of the seashore. The sand of the seashore is given *territorial possession.* (Possess the gate of his enemies).
If you state that Abraham was Justified in the sight of men in James Chapter 2, WHO was with Abraham and Isaac when Abraham offered his son?
Genesis 22:3
And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and saddled his ass, and took *two of his young men with him,* and Isaac his son, and clave the wood for the burnt offering, and rose up, and went unto the place of which God had told him.
(v. 4-5)
Then on the third day Abraham lifted up his eyes, and saw the place afar off.
*5And Abraham said unto his young men, Abide ye here with the ass; and I and the lad will go yonder and worship, and come again to you.*
No witness to Abraham's faith except for Isaac and the Lord.
1. Who is the Book of James written to?
2. Was Abraham Justified before men when he offered Isaac?
3. How was Abraham's Justification reckoned according to Paul?
4. Does "qualifying" faith answer the discrepancies between Romans 4:4-10 and James 2:21-24?
Abraham was Justified before God BOTH TIMES, not before men. James 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; *thou doest well:* the devils also believe, and tremble. James commends this man for his faith, not that it is a "saving" faith, or a "dead" faith. Devils cannot be saved, for they are a spirit. Jesus Christ was *manifest in the flesh to save men.* James 2:22 *Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?* Abraham the JEW did the work of offering Isaac. And by this WORK his FAITH was made complete. No "saving" faith, "dead" faith, etc. (v. 26) For as the *body* without the spirit is dead, so *faith without works* is dead also.
Dead body=no spirit. Faith - works=dead body.
To further prove that Romans Ch. 4 And James Ch. 2 are written to two different people consider that the original promise to Abram by believing what God told him about the stars (Genesis 15) is expanded in Genesis 22 to the sands of the sea AND A LAND PROMISE.
Genesis 22:17
That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, *and as the sand which is upon the sea shore;*
and thy *seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;*
Christians are never given a land promise.
As far as a sodomite Pastor or lgtbq ou8i2+!@ whatever, no dispensational Baptist would approve of his preaching or being a Pastor, let alone a teacher.
The Old Testament condemns sodomy as does the New (Romans Chapter 1). To conclude that both a sodomite "Pastor" and a Bible believing dispensational Baptist into the same heresy is a faulty polemic similar to the first century heresy of "Two Powers in Heaven" leveled at Christians to designate them "heretics" along with gnostics by the Jews.
Very well written, I enjoyed every bit of it. May God grant the readers repentance to the acknowledging of the truth.
Grace and Peace brother
No such thing as a "split" covenant. One gospel, one plan of salvation. These guys are making this way to hard.
Thank you for having common sense. Its refreshing. :)
Does the sermon on the mount apply directly to the church??
According to my understanding it is for Jews..but it might be wrong...idk
What's troubling are those people out there who practice a system of interpretation whereby they are essentially saying that Paul did not speak the entire Gospel in 1 Corinthians 15:1-8, where he said nothing about works also being a means for justification, where James said in James 2 that works is the means by which one is justified if coupled with faith. They cannot both be true for us today. It's really that simple. Paul gave to us the COMPLETE Gospel, not a partial one, with the book of James being applied as supplement to Paul's teaching. If works were at all a means for justification unto salvation, then Paul would certainly have spoken those words to us, but he didn't. Works of the Law contain many/most of the good works we may do in life, and yet Paul spoke vehemently against the notion of works being a thing of boasting before God. So, yes, rightly dividing the epistles along the line of their distinctions and differences, which proves they were directed at different audiences under differing dispensations, that only leads to Paul being labeled a false apostle, which many in the Hebrew Roots movement practice and believe, or at minimum an apostles who failed to teach the full Gospel to Gentiles. The anti-rightly dividing gangs, and anti-dispensational gangs, have no other recourse for conclusion to their warped beliefs!
James 2 is talking about justification in the eyes of men compare it with Romans 4 and toward the end of James 2 it means rehab the harlot being justified by works. So you telling me a harlot is saved by good works even tho she’s A HARLOT?
Mentions*
Robertson has never seen the inside of a Bible, and consistently proves it.
Pastors that were indoctrinated in Peter Ruckman's teachings fail to comprehend that scripture reveals ONE gospel revealed piecemeal over time; ONE plan of salvation by grace alone through faith alone in the Redeemer alone; ONE people alone; and, ONE destiny alone. Ruckman taught multiple gospels, faith plus works, three groups of people, and multiple destinations for God's Elect. Not to mention that Ruckman taught that blacks were inferior to whites, that he believed in everything the KKK stand for, abortion is not murder, women will be 33 year old men when they are raptured, Adam was saved by the blood of a four-footed beast, along with other heretical teachings.
@@Jorge-sp9yk Study to show yourself approved unto God. You'll lack true biblical knowledge if all you think you need to do is listen to what Ruckman and other Ruckmanite teachers have to say.
If you did study to show yourself approved unto God, you'll see clearly that the GOSPEL, or GOOD NEWS, of Jesus's death burial and resurrection are told in MML&J and Acts and in Paul's epistles. Read and study them.
Jesus tells His disciples the good news about His death, burial, and resurrection in Matthew 20:19, and the actual resurrection takes place in Matthew 28. THE GOSPEL- GOOD NEWS. 👏
Jesus tells His disciples the good news about His death, burial, and resurrection in Mark 8:31-33 and Mark 10:32-34, and the actual resurrection takes place in Mark 16. THE GOSPEL - GOOD NEWS. 👏
Jesus tells His disciples the good news about His death, burial, and resurrection in Luke 9:21-22, 18:31-33, and the actual resurrection takes place in Luke 24. THE GOSPEL - GOOD NEWS. 👏
Jesus tells His disciples the good news about His death, burial, and resurrection in John 11:25-26, and the actual resurrection takes place in John 20. THE GOSPEL - GOOD NEWS. 👏
Peter preached the GOSPEL of the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. See, Acts 2:21-33, 3:15-26. GOOD NEWS 👏
Philip preached the GOSPEL of the death burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. See, Acts 8:5, 8:26-35. GOOD NEWS 👏
There's lots more that Jesus said to his disciples regarding the reason He came to die. IT'S ALL GOOD NEWS. All you have to do is study.
See, Matthew 5:17, 9:15, 12:39-40. 16:21-28, 17:22-23;
Mark 2:20, 9:9,12, 30-32, 14:8
John 3:14, 3:16, 12:23-24.
If Jesus, Peter, Paul, and Philip all taught and preached the death burial and resurrection of Christ, then all the apostles were doing the same, just as future disciples have been doing ever since, and just as we do now. The GOSPEL is the same yesterday, today, and forever because there is only ONE GOSPEL. 👏
Be blessed.
So according to Kim, can gentiles get saved in the tribulation? Will they need to do works if so? (Yes, I know the tribulation was first century, but Kim places it in the future.)
Is there a fuller refutation of this doctrine online.
Yes, here is one dealing with their error regarding James: Does James Teach Salvation by Faith Plus Works? Refuting Mid-Acts and Hyper Dispensationalism
th-cam.com/video/6H0xqdXFtCQ/w-d-xo.html
If you don’t believe the ENTIRE Bible is truth, then there’s your problem.
Jesus came before his death to the lost HOUSE of Israel
He said so in scriptures. So either you can’t read, can’t divide or you don’t believe the Bible.
All of those problems exist with you….not anyone else.
Matthew 15:24 KJV
[24] But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
AFTER the DEATH of Jesus & Resurrection….Jesus sent Paul to preach grace to His church.
The Jews are not the Church.
Gentiles only. Some few Jews may repent and accept Jesus but most won’t because of Romans 11….blindness until the fulness of the Gentiles…which is the physical departure. Makes plenty of sense.
And last I checked Eternal Salvation is a free gift that lasts forever. Those who accept it are changed for life.
We are Saved Eternally FOR works, not BY works.
What a ridiculous and nonsensical comment. I have multiple videos on my channel refuting the absurdity of your claims. This is what happens when you get your theology from people who rip apart the cohesiveness of the scripture like do the men in this video.
Yea you're being "ridiculous and nonsensical."
Thank you for speaking out. This guy is lost.
When these people misuse the "rightly dividing the word of truth" phrase, it doesn't mean to divide or separate the Bible into different categories, it just means to handle it correctly or accurately (something which, ironically, these people aren't doing). I like the NASB 1995 translation of it, "accurately handling the word of truth." Here's Thayer's definition of the Greek word "ὀρθοτομέω" (orthotomeō):
"ὀρθοτομέω, ὀρθοτόμω; (ὀρθοτομος cutting straight, and this from ὀρθός and τέμνω);
1. to cut straight: τάς ὁδούς, to cut straight ways, i. e. to proceed by straight paths, hold a straight course, equivalent to to do right (for יִשֵּׁר), Proverbs 3:6; Proverbs 11:5 (viam secare, Vergil Aen. 6, 899).
2. dropping the idea of cutting, to make straight and smooth; Vulg.rectetracto, to handle aright: τόν λόγον τῆς ἀληθείας, i. e. to teach the truth correctly and directly, 2 Timothy 2:15; τόν ἀληθῆ λόγον, Eustathius, opuscc., p. 115, 41. (Not found elsewhere (except in ecclesiastical writings (Winer's Grammar, 26); e. g. constt. apost. 7, 31 ἐν τῷ τοῦ κυρίου δόγμασιν; cf. Suicer ii. 508f). Cf. καινοτομέω, to cut new veins in mining; dropping the notion of cutting, to make something new, introduce new things, make innovations or changes, etc.)"
no
The bible says you must be born again
Do they also disdain & disregard 1&2 Peter, 1,2,3, John, Jude & Revelation? Why only pick on James and Hebrews?
What better way to divide the church and weaken a believers walk than to encourage them to rigidly hold onto bad theology. Theology that is divisive and then to take that theology and judge other Christians as less than since they don't believe the same exact way. This is a theology of demons meant to pick apart the flock. To draw the sheep to the outskirts of the fields and away from the master. Dangerously close to the lions seeking to steal, kill and destroy. I remember going round and round with kids in my Christian high school (decades ago when I was in high school). They would blindly quote their pastors message, and out of context. And then in that perverted (out of context) view think they were justified in their "holy anger" or "moral high-ground". In truth, not actually being holy or moral.
"Rightly Dividing Scripture" sounds more like idol worship of a commentary instead of taking a balanced approach and actually breaking down the scriptures into it's lessons and truth. I guess it's easier to hold a hard-line than it is to be flexible, teachable and humble as the Spirit leads. With the hard-line there's no real work, it's just eating the same grass, regurgitating it, then chewing it again. Over and over as faithful livestock in a barn of lies, at the edge of destruction.
Keep up the good work. Continue to fight the good fight. That way you can finish strong. Praise God that you realized the truth and seek to shine light on the bad theology all while pointing those lost in it back to Christ.
Jonathan, this is a good vid. As a non-believer in Christianity though, let me weigh in with ideas you might not think about. The first I want to voice is that there is no univocality of the Christian Bible. These other preachers jump through hoops to make things line up, and you do as well. There are glaring contradictions in your Bible, among the biggest is the faith/works stuff you highlight here. Clearly, as this argument is as old as Christianity itself, the texts do not agree.
The second thing I want to mention is this. If there is a Holy Spirit that gives understanding to sincere believers, there should be some consensus. There is not. You might say those others are not sincere, but others could say that of you. If there is a Holy Spirit, why can't you guys just pray and agree? Jonathan, from the outside looking in, it does not appear that there is a supernatural element to this belief system. It seems all man-made. That there is such dissension in those that claim belief in Jesus called the Christ is evidence of this.
Dallas Theological Seminary does not teach this stuff. Masters Seminary doesn’t teach it. Other seminaries that reject covenant (replacement) theology don’t teach it. Moody doesn’t teach it. Etc. etc. etc. Dispensationalism is not the problem and replacement (covenant) theology is not the answer.
My son goes to Master’s. I hold to the same views as MacArthur.
Who is now the King of Israel in John 1:49? Is the King of Israel now the Head of the Church, and are we His Body? Why did God allow the Romans to destroy the Old Covenant temple and the Old Covenant city, about 40 years after His Son fulfilled the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34 in blood at Calvary?
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart.
Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36)
We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
===========
Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ?
(Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30)
The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations?
1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Paul’s interpretation in Galatians 3:8.)
2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ?
3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds?
4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh?
5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers?
6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"?
7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost?
8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.)
9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis?
10. Watch the TH-cam video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church.
Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church:
“The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107.
Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.”
Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323.
John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated…
"...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.”
John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.)
What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16?
(See what Joshua said about the Old Covenant land promise in Josh. 21:43.)
Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth?
Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups?
Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and is it fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 12:18-24?
Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church, if the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20? (See also 2 Thess. 1:7-10) If the New Covenant has made the Old Covenant “obsolete” in Hebrews 8:6-13, why would God go back to the Old Covenant system during a future time period?
Read the recent book "The Rise and Fall of Dispensationalism", by Daniel G. Hummel.
@@SpotterVideo You misunderstood my point. @pastorburris was arguing against a view that few people hold outside of a fringe group of independent fundamentalists. The schools I mentioned, including Dallas, reject these views. News flash. Dallas Seminary was founded 100 years ago this year. Guess what. It has changed. I’m not going to argue with you but feel free to read Dr. Michael Vlach’s book Has The Church Replaced Israel. I doubt you will because your type is only interested in listening to yourselves drone on and on and on and on and on and on. I was in the PCA for 18 years so I am VERY familiar with your views. Keep them and all the allegory that comes with them with my blessing. Done.
@spottervideo
Too, too, too long winded.
SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE REFORMED PPL IN THE BACK 🗣️🗣️🗣️
… be ye transformed…. They’ll be known by their fruits …. I’ll show you my faith by my works.
Salvation by faith in grace alone.
Which in having a true heart transformation…
Sanctification will be a daily work for the rest of a true follower’s (of Jesus ) life.
Amen
@@pastorburris people (generally) have difficulty in looking at things that are different than their current experience (in Bible interpretation).
As soon as you say works are a requirement in the Christian walk, they bring up salvation (which wasn’t you never said it’s required at salvation) then it appears like they can’t get unstuck.
I am accused of legalism constantly. I usually respond and ask “do you commit adultery?” They say they do not. Then I ask why? According to you (your defining works as legalism), isn’t that legalism?
They can’t get past that obedience is based on our love for Him. Obedience is a choice and joined to worship. That which we obey is who (or what we worship). It’s our idol if it’s not the Lord.
The Bible verse that states “… I don’t know you, you worker of iniquity” … the word for iniquity is actually “you who practice lawlessness”. And it has to be someone who says there’s a Christian as they proclaimed “…Lord I did this and that in Your name”.
So lawlessness to a Christian, are those who state the 10 commandments are no longer valid.
They forget…. “Not one jot or one tittle will be removed…”. And “if you love me, obey my commandments (all 10). And “ those who say they love me, and keep not my commandments is a liar and the truth is not in him”.
The laws nailed to the cross are those handwritten that are shadows of Christ.
The 10 commandments are not a shadow, were written in stone by God (though anodes reiterated them on skins) and cannot be grouped to the laws associated to operating the sanctuary which was all acts of symbolism that were fulfilled in Jesus at His arrival.
I am sorry you get all that kick back. As you’re standing on Bible. Therefore, you have His favor.
@@pastorburris Dispensationalism only came in to bring in the mid 1800’s. Error upon error makes it tough for them to break out of Futurism and Dispensationalism.
God says only one wife to man. This, there cannot be a different gospel for Jews and gentiles. He only is coming for one bride. Not two. God says no bigamy.
"The misunderstanding of what Paul meant by '
"Rightly dividing" has caused a lot of unnecessary confusion with doctrine. Why can't more people stress what rightly dividing really means?
KJV Strong's concordance: orthotomeō - to make a straight cut, i.e. (fig.) to dissect (expound) correctly (the divine message) - rightly divide [1x].
orthotomeō, lit. "to cut straight," is found in 2 Ti. 2:15, "rightly dividing" (the word of truth); the meaning passed from the idea of cutting or "dividing" to the more general sense of "rightly dealing with a thing." WHAT IS INTENDED HERE IS NOT "DIVIDING" SCRIPTURE FROM SCRIPTURE , BUT TEACHING SCRIPTURE ACCURATLEY, CAREFULLY DISCERNING EACH NUANCE [Emphasis mine].
Blue Letter Bible : Strong's G3718
Outline of Biblical Usage: II. to make straight and smooth, to handle aright, to teach the truth directly and correctly.
Strong's G3718 (Blue Letter Bible)
. dropping the idea of cutting, to make straight and smooth; Vulg.rectetracto, to handle aright: τόν λόγον τῆς ἀληθείας, i. e. to teach the truth correctly and directly, 2 Timothy 2:15;
Vine's Dictionary also explains that "rightly dividing" does not mean "dividing" scripture from scripture, but rather teaching scripture accurately.
Whenever I encounter one I have to disentangle myself like I've walked into a spider web. They do not seem to want to be corrected. Their entire way of looking at God's Word is, instead of being founded on Jesus Christ, based on 'what era of time are you in=what to believe/do to be saved.' Why do they insist on it? Scofield teachings are one answer, but I believe there must be a reason they refuse to come out of that stronghold. For example, atheists refuse to believe in God because they do not want to be told what to do by anyone or held to account. They therefore make their own selves 'God.' And other "religions" don't want to give up sin or suffer or be changed from the inside out, or die to self. Hyper-dispensationalists, perhaps, cannot grasp the "one new man" of Ephesians 2:15. They always stress that the book of Hebrews was written to Hebrews and James to the 12 Tribes and are therefore not for us. Well, Romans was written to Romans and Corinthians to Corinthians, etc., so what do they do with that? I've also noticed that hardcore dispensationalists think that you can sin all your way to Heaven because Jesus "paid it all past, present and future." They occasionally teach repentance and confession and struggle and overcoming, but they always seem to fall back on grace...without fruit.
Wakeup and discern that yes they were in fact practicing the same gospel. Even Paul says go to Jesus at the cross and by your salvation, your works will attest to the faith found in the believer. These times, the church need to be discerning for false doctrines that preceed the days of revelation foretold.
Scofield defines Paul's gospel as
*“that Jesus Christ, the rejected King, has died on the cross for the sins of the world, that He was raised from the dead for our justification, and that by Him all that believe are justified from all things”* from Acts 13 and on the same page Scofield also says it is
*“of ‘the uncircumcision’ (Gal. 2. 7) because it saves wholly apart from forms and ordinances” (Scofield Reference Bible, rev. ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1917), 1343)* , thereby agreeing with and historically solidifying the Mid-Acts distinction of the gospels mentioned in Galatians 2:7 (the New Scofield Reference Bible keeps all the labels Scofield gave but removes this one). It was the New Scofield Reference Bible which kept all his notes on the gospel of the grace of God (NSRB pg. 1366), except for Scofield saying it was the gospel of the uncircumcision, since to Scofield it implies a distinction with the gospel of the opposite name.
It is Lewis Sperry Chafer who was Scofied's protege and Charles F. Baker (founder of Grace Missions International and the Grace Gospel Fellowship) was Chafer's protege who maintained these teachings.
Pastor Baker (a premiere Mid-Acts scholar and theologian) also maintained: “no one, in any dispensation, receives salvation as a reward for his works or faithfulness.” (Charles F. Baker Understanding the Gospels, pg. 172)
GotQuestions disagrees yet has no fellowship problem with the Mid-Acts position www.gotquestions.org/mid-Acts-dispensationalism.html
🔥🔥🔥
This needed to be said, and many people need to hear
Pastor B, in reading the comment thread, it appears you've collected enough trolls that I'd say you are doing some good and making a real impact. 🙂 (I think one of the most useful and valid measures of effective reach on social media is an informal stat I call, 'troll collection.' )
Preach brother PREACH!!!!
Wow the internet is full of crazy “preachers” butchering the word of God. That gay guy said Paul and Jesus contradict eachother,
”I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.“
Galatians 1:6-8 KJV
Then he said Paul never met Jesus.
”And as he journeyed, it came to pass that he drew nigh unto Damascus: and suddenly there shone round about him a light out of heaven: and he fell upon the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? And he said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: but rise, and enter into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. And the men that journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing the voice, but beholding no man.
Acts 9:3-7 ASV
And he has the nerve to mention his seminary degrees!?
Thank you for this video. I know we need to study on our own but is there a study Bible you would recommend? I consider myself a dispensationalist but have always held there is only one gospel for all times and ages. I never took dividing the dispensations for different gospels. I always understood the dividing as properly reading and understanding and applying the Scriptures.
MacArthur is a Dispensationalist (similar to me). I highly recommend his commentaries or his study Bible.
@@pastorburris Thank you pastor Burris. I have a MacArthur Study Bible. I like MacArthur’s expositional preaching. I have to use a pick out the meat and throw away the bones with MacArthur. I am not a Calvinist but like him on most other things.
@@pastorburris
Watch the TH-cam video "Genesis of Dispensational Theology", if you want to see the original source of the doctrine in black and white. It came from a book written by a Roman Catholic Jesuit priest named Manuel Lacunza. The "Two Peoples of God" doctrine is less than 200 years old.
Israel will not be saved by Grace through faith. They don't get saved until the end of their 70th week when Christ returns (Acts 3:19), and that is only if they endure till the end, and didn't take the Mark of the Beast. 1 John 5:16
@@pastorburris I thought in this video you were exposing dispensationalism as error, and here you are saying you are one?! I'm confused!
Johnathan... I'm a dispensationalist, and I don't believe any of that stuff, nor do I personally know any other dispys that believe it either. Maybe it's an IFB thing, and I've never been an IFB, though I did attend an IFB Church here in NZ for a short time as there was no other dispensational Church in that small town, but left as it became apparent that they were Antisemitic. Most of my walk I've tended to flip between Calvary Chapels, or Open Brethren Assemblies depending on where I am due to my past military career, (very few Messianic congregations in NZ), as these suit my theological outlook. But I've never come across the beliefs you highlight in this presentation, (maybe I didn't attend that IFB long enough to find out). What you allege here is totally foreign to me. I've read many books out of Dallas, and not found these beliefs there either. I also personally knew Dr Chuck Missler who taught me a great deal, and introduced me to Amir Tsarfati when he was in NZ, and Dr Arnold Fructenbaum, all dispensationalists, who do not hold to these beliefs. I do not believe Yeshua taught a different Gospel, I believe Yeshua highlighted how my ethnic brethren had drifted from what is written. And I most certainly do not believe in faith plus works for anybody. Avraham believed, and it was accounted to him for righteousness, salvation has ALWAYS been by grace through faith... And James... James is NOT in deference to the Apostle, James and Paul stand back to back with their swords pointing outward. The dispensationalism you speak of is to be avoided, it doesn't sound like dispensationalism as I know it at all...
The auto flipping camera angles are distracting. It would be better to stay with just one angle.
Thank you for your feedback.
@@pastorburris Anytime!
I have a hard time giving any credence to the notion that Paul, converted by Christ himself on the road to Damascus, taught a different gospel than Christ.
Brandon Robertson is a truly cringe-worthy wolf in sheep's clothing who will lead souls directly to damnation.
I read the King James Version but I’m not a dispensationalist!
Nothing wrong with that
Oh , love the President Bush quote too …🤔
As if I needed either him , Tucker Carlson , or Mr. Rich to be a source of wisdom on the matter .
🤨
”…a workman who does not need to be ashamed, ACCURATELY HANDLING the word of truth.“
2 Timothy 2:15 NASB1995
When you're calling on people to reject the teachings of Jesus, you're calling on people to not be Christians.
I am not calling on anyone to reject the teachings of Jesus. Not in the slightest.
@@pastorburris Generic "you."
“Go not into the way of the Gentiles“
- Jesus
Matthew 15:24
[24]But he answered and SAID, I AM NOT SENT BUT UNTO THE LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL.
Matthew 10:5-7
[5]These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, GO NOT INTO THE WAY OF THE GENTILES, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:
[6]BUT GO RATHER TO THE LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL.
[7]And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand.
@@carriebasso5075 Matthew 28.19-20a: "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you."
please permit to ask you this question.
Where did Jesus become our Goat of Departure.
Is it on the Cross?
Can one goat be used as sin offering and goat of departure at the same time?
What dose that even mean? Christ is called a lamb
@@A_Mind_For_Change thanks for your response.
Christ would have to become the substitute for the sin offering goat and the live goat to bring about our complete forgiveness of sins according to Leviticus 16.
Though the NT refers to him as lamb of God. Both can be interchange.
You see on the cross he became our sin offering goat or lamb.
So where and when or how did he fulfill becoming our live goat and carried our transgressions and iniquities to the desert. Was it on the Cross?
If your response is Yes, we need to explain it more. God specify 2 activities on the day of atonement but we celebrate one, i.e on the cross. And poetic - ly explain the sin offering to redeem our sin nature and brought about the forgiveness of our sins. By saying that the blood wash away our transgressions or that Christ became a curse on the cross for us. This and more are explanation. But God specifies live goat carries our iniquities into the desert and the death of the sin offering goat becomes our substitute to die for our sins.
I believe that there was true forgiveness of sins particularly our transgressions and iniquities in the forgiveness of sins John the Baptist preached. This was supported by Christ Jesus when asked about the source of his authority in Mathew 23:13. He pointed them to John's baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins.
Please carefully review this facts and comment. Forgiveness of sin was later pointed to the cross much later. At first it was identified by or to forgiveness of sin by baptism. Act 3:38 according to Christ's instructions.
I have more to say. Hope you're not too diverted for ur teaching, though the teaching are revolutionary. That's why I asked these questions.
@@sokoyagbemiga8412 mmmm, yes. This is actually something a teacher I listen to has gone over. Your referring to the Jews sacrificing Christ upon an alter correct? Here is a link to a teacher who has done a teaching on it, it's something I need to do more studying on and is WAY to much to type out. I'm truly shocked to stumble upon someone else who is aware of this very important detail!
His name is RightDivider and the video is called Israel's 5 cycles of chastisement if you don't trust the link.
m.th-cam.com/video/u6ABPhE6KZA/w-d-xo.html&pp=ygUwUmlnaHQgZGl2aWRlciBJc3JlYWxzIDV0aCBjeXhsZSBvZiBjaGFzdGlzdGVtZW50
Pastor, you are a breathe of fresh air, I'm a leaky dispensationalist. Men have always been saved one way, by grace through faith Eph 2:8, Titus 3:5...I also came out of KJV mythology. I read and study out of the ESV, NASB "95" and the (LSB mostly.) Thank you for your gracious and truthful content.
2 Timothy 2:15 is mistranslated in the KJV to say "rightly dividing the word of truth." Dispensationalist hang on this verse. But this is a mistranslation of the Greek word "ὀθομέω" which means to cut a straight path without deviation. Correct translations of this word are "rightly handling" or "rightly explaining " or "accurately handling" the word of truth. The verse is not about division but about teaching the gospel in a straight and true manner without deviation or perversion. This the dispensationalists fail to do falling into another mistranslation rabbit hole.
"ὀρθοτομέω or-thot-om-eh'-o" G3718 was the word used. It literally translates to rightly divide according to the dictionary. other definitions are to dissect correctly (i.e divide) and to make a straight cut (i.e divide)
nope! no scripture used to back up your debate in this video? . Scripture with Scripture, you preach and not teach not once did you say open up your bible to.... . Iron to Iron. God Bless.
Is there enough scripture for you in this video? Does James Teach Salvation by Faith Plus Works? Refuting Mid-Acts and Hyper Dispensationalism
th-cam.com/video/6H0xqdXFtCQ/w-d-xo.html
Doesn't the Bible teach that salvation was in the heart of God from before the foundation of the world? That rules out "different salvations".
The Old Testament saints were looking forward to the Messiah. They were in Paradise when Jesus led captivity captive and took them to Heaven.@@coolchamp2902
Seems that part of the issue here is KJV onlyism without an understanding of the KJV archaic language.
It’s also Peter Ruchman who teach this
Once you go to other versions of the Bible you get messed up. The KJV has it all right, the real heresies come from other versions. There are many gospels if you deny that you’re just ignorant and I pray that you find the truth.
Ah, you seem to forget that JW’s, SDAs, and LDS all love the KJV. It was the JW’s preferred translation prior to their NWT. You really walked right into that without thinking it through.
@@pastorburris Yet they don’t use it anymore and look where they’re at. Proved my point, actually. Thanks!
Ouch. It’s almost as if you don’t know what you are talking about. Most SDAs are KJV Only. JW’s will accept readings from the KJV, but not other versions other than the NWT. Most Mormons also use the KJV. So, the only thing I proved is that you don’t know what you are talking about. You’re welcome.
@@pastorburris yet, they don’t know how to interpret. You haven’t proved anything. But I appreciate your perspective and time
I’ve argued consistently, but you have changed your answer three times since I have corrected you. I think we are done here. Have a good weekend.
Please explain Matt 25:31-46...that in a nutshell is the Abrahamic covenant where the gentiles have to bless Israel in the tribulation in order to get into the kingdom. They have to have faith plus works. James 2:14-16 goes along with Matt 25:31-46, they have to bless Israel by supplying them of what they need.
They are hyper-gracers.....that is the bigger problem IMO...the motive seems to be sin is ok for those now in the Church age....
No disagreement from me on that.
Grace motivates! I appreciate my completeness in Him! Meanwhile, Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God. Saved hyper gracers believe what was written to them, hence, 1 Cor. For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's. It might be that you are not saved, if you are working to keep yourself saved!!? Ephesians 1:13, I hope this helps!
The problem is that people don't know how to use *context.* Who wrote the book you are in? Who is the audience?
James is an apostle to the Jews.
Paul is an apostle to the Gentile.
all of the Bible is for us, however not all of the Bible is written to us.
Paul wrote to both Jews and Gentiles. James, while writing to believing Jews was teaching believing Jews of his day how to live as Christians. See part two of this video where I explain what James is talking about. James and Paul were not in conflict and there is only one gospel for both Jews and Gentiles (Romans 1:16).
You are right brother..but i too was wrong.. Robert breaker is wrong
There are differences between the doctrines of Jesus Christ's earthly ministry to the Jew only (Matt. 10:5-8) and Paul's to the gentile and Jew. A FEW:
Matthew 5:22
But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: *but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.*
Galatians 3:1
*O foolish Galatians,* who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?
1 Cor. 15:35-36
But some man will say, How are the dead raised up? and with what body do they come? *36Thou fool,* that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die:
Was Paul in danger of hellfire? He did this TWICE.
Matthew 19:16-25
And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, *what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?*
17And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, *keep the commandments.*
18He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, *Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,*
*19Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.*
20The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: *what lack I yet?*
21Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, *go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.*
22But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions.
23Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, *That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven.*
24And again I say unto you, *It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.*
25When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, *Who then can be saved?*
1 Timothy 6:17-18
Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not highminded, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God, who giveth us richly all things to enjoy; *18That they do good, that they be rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate;*
IF you think these are the same doctrines you either do not study the scriptures or are dishonest.
The young ruler askes Jesus what he must do to INHERIT ETERNAL LIFE!
Jesus states to KEEP THE COMMANDMENTS.
The young ruler askes Jesus he has kept them and asks what he LACKS.
Jesus tells him to SELL what he HAS and give to the poor.
Do you own anything? A car. house. clothes, property, bank account?
What does Paul say to the rich, to do the same? NAY.
They’re dishonest. Jesus says to prayer a certain prayer in your closet and Paul says for we know not what to pray and to pray everywhere. Paul’s says we’re covered by the blood of Jesus but James said we can have sins covered if we lead someone to Christ.
Anyone who can read on a third grade level should see that these are two different doctrines
Paul never met Jesus???? Paul definitely met Jesus on the road to Damascus. Where do you think Paul got the words for the epistles he wrote. Pauls epistles ARE the word of our Lord Jesus Christ. Those words were revealed directly to Paul by Jesus Christ (Gal 1:11-12).
Salvation is Grace of God through faith in Jesus it always has been and will be no works.
This is correct!
I Believe God!!!
Even the followers are judging...Evangelicals are the most judgemental (sinners) i have personally experienced. They LEAD...with YOU, and THEY...how sad people have lost the real meaning and application
I read gene Kim's book and thought this is totally off. I realize a good amount of dispensationalist don't believe in multiple gospels and mid-acts dispensationism like these false teachers.
You didn't refute them. You only stated that they're wrong. Unless you make another video showing why you believe they're wrong this "refutation" is incomplete.
Just showing a clip and then asking "where did they get this from" isn't actually proving anything. It's just you stating your opinion.
Here you go. Does James Teach Salvation by Faith Plus Works? Refuting Mid-Acts and Hyper Dispensationalism
th-cam.com/video/6H0xqdXFtCQ/w-d-xo.html
Amen!
There are divisions. However no-one has been able to answer a simple question i have asked on multiple comment sections. Why did Paul baptize a Gentile Philippian jailor if water baptism is not for Gentiles. The Acts 2:38 commandment is 100% applicable to the church, imo, backed by examples throughout Acts.
He baptist some people as he says in 1 Corinthians 1:14-16 but when you go to verse 17 he says Christ sent him not to baptize but to preach the gospel: Christ is the one that commanded him to do so..the program of water baptism was interrupted. Now in the dispensation of grace the Holy Spirit is the one that baptizes pple into the body of Christ 1 Corinthians 12:12-13
@@wesleykariuki8951 I appreciate the answer but that could easily be interpreted as "someone else can do the baptizing, i'm here to preach." It would be a strange thing to say though, i mean why would Paul point that out right.
@@GregRickard their are different types of baptism in the bible for example Matthew 3:11 John says I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that comes after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire. Notice these are three different baptism in one verse. There is at least a dozen different baptism in the bible but Paul in Ephesians 4:5 says we have one baptism..so which one is ours out of the twelve..I can get you the verse with the different kinds of baptism if you like.
You know what I’ve noticed recently? That there seems to be an acute rise in videos denouncing dispensational biblical truths.
But that they all appear to hold to the same pattern, is what alarms me. First , one must establish in the minds of the audience that dispensational understanding appeared out of nowhere ; a la Schofield and Darby . And then , without arguing this point scripturally and fairly, you hold up some weak examples of dispensational teaching and cherry pick . The fact that Tucker Carlson and the Country star John Rich just addressed it recently, and followed the same outline and method ; bodes darkly indeed .
Looks coordinated and reeks of an agenda , Methinks .
I can tolerate sincere disagreements from folks , so long as scripture is the framework of the discussion and is used to make one’s case and argue to a conclusion. But all the stuff I hear about refutation of two gospels in Gal 2:7 in the KJV Bible is of this most unfortunate kind . Boo …!
How could Jesus preach the same Gospel if he had not died, been buried and rose again?
Look into the many times he tried to tell the desciples of what would come to pass and their reactions. Peter comes to mind in Mathew 16:20-23.
So why did Jesus not want this to be known? Well lets look at 1 Corinthians 2:6-8
"Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought:
But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory:
Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory."
Praise God for his omniscious and wisdom! Allowing Satan to think he was going to stop Christ from fulfilling what he came to do for all the world! (1 Timothy 4:10)
I'm surprised you didnt wrap this whole thing back into Ruckmanism. If I'm not mistaken Bell, Kim and Breaker are all Ruckmanites
Correct. All Ruckmanites.
Gospel of the circumcision and gospel of the un-circumscision... are CLEARLY not the same things:
Galatians 2:7-8 "But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)" That didn't come out of the Schofield Bible, brother.
I have been told this same nonsense pastor, I contend that Paul didn't preach a different gospel than Jesus. The problem is the gospel of the Kingdom has been neglected or distorted because of a misunderstanding of Grace. The whole book from Genesis to Revelation is about the Kingdom of YHVH restored to the earth.
Let me ask you a question. God in genesis chapter 9 told Noah to eat all kinds of animals without exceptions why did he then tell the Israelites not to eat certain animals. Was there a mistake with what he told Noah?
The gospel of grace has been consistent from Genesis to Revelation. It has never been about works (law), it has always been about grace. Works or deeds have always been about acting on your faith. Jesus made it clear, only by believing in Him are we saved. This is the result of reading God’s worth through theological lenses. Let the Word speak, we don’t need to explain God, He does it for us.
When Matthew 25:31-44 has our Lord affirming that the basis of someone's entrance into the kingdom or banishment to hell is based on whether or not they did or did not do certain good works, how does that match Ephesians 2:8-9? Just curious...
Have you ever read Romans 2 or Ephesians 2:10. Those are pretty important portions of scripture that present a clear message. I have a video coming out this week showing that James and Paul were in agreement in their doctrine. I hope you will check it out.
So which is it works grace something in between????
It's grace through faith alone.
Does anybody see the complete hypocrite this Calvinist is . He is right people where saved throughout - by Faith . He personally attacks Peter Ruckman for his marriages but Ruckman was saved by Grace . However this hypocrite doesn’t say. Anything about David - Samson. - Rahab the Harlot - Solomon - Lot ( righteous lot who slept with his daughters . ). All these men were saved by Grace . Hebrews 11. But he holds Peter Ruckman to his self righteous standards .
Would you like to repent of your lying? I never mentioned Ruckman’s marriages. Never.