Tata Vs Mistry Case: Takeaways From Supreme Court Judgment

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @dharmendupandya6640
    @dharmendupandya6640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very clear explanation on this Case. Thanks for sharing.
    D.K.Pandya, Advocate

  • @tararrum
    @tararrum 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent interview

  • @kedarnathpanda8724
    @kedarnathpanda8724 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is Supreme Court is aware about the law framed for oppression & mismanagement. I am SC in not aware about business & company law.

  • @kedarnathpanda8724
    @kedarnathpanda8724 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is like a ordinary graduate giving jaudgement on nuclear medicine, rocket science without basic domain knowledge.

  • @kedarnathpanda8724
    @kedarnathpanda8724 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The SC negated the law framed by Parliament. Does the SC has expertise in company law, if law interpreted by this then there is no need of Parliament & let SC frame law & interpret differently in different case & that is why our judiciary run by collegium system is the worst in world. How the SC quash the order of NCLAT WHICH has expert in company law . Why a common man won't belive that the judgement is biased under influence of tata .SC didn't finalize but gave more branch for more litigation to favour advocate earning & where it goes it is for everyone to guess ? Why SC could not settle once & final about valuation.
    Three was gross oppression had company law interpreted rightly by SC . If someone is prematurely removed because of majority it is gross oppression.