Thanks for your comment. We are wonderung on what is your statement based? As commonly known exist two approaches for assesment of soil-water status. The measurement of soil water potential and the measurement of soil-water content. Both approaches have their pros and cons, but under no circumstances it is possible to say, that one of these approches is inferior or produces more error than the other. The information provided (or the result of measuremnt) just gives a diffenrent piece of information. Apart from this, it is of course true, that every measurement involves the risk of error. This is one of the reasons we recommend several replications. Chers Tino
Thankssss
This suction measurement is associated with error
Thanks for your comment. We are wonderung on what is your statement based?
As commonly known exist two approaches for assesment of soil-water status. The measurement of soil water potential and the measurement of soil-water content. Both approaches have their pros and cons, but under no circumstances it is possible to say, that one of these approches is inferior or produces more error than the other. The information provided (or the result of measuremnt) just gives a diffenrent piece of information.
Apart from this, it is of course true, that every measurement involves the risk of error. This is one of the reasons we recommend several replications.
Chers Tino