ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ค. 2023
- Head to squarespace.com/parlogram to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code 'parlogram'.
Released 20 years ago, Let It Be..Naked was a radical re-working of the 1970 'Let It Be" album which not only re-imagined the album but which completely removed Phil Spector's production. Praised on it's release it is today in the wake of the recent remix and Get Back film as irrelevant. In this video we look at not just the history of the project but its sound quality and reputation and ask if in 2023, it's worthy or worthless.
Check out our 'Let It Be'/'Get Back' TH-cam playlist: • Let It Be Album & Get ...
Take a look at some great sounding vintage Beatles and 60s vinyl for sale on our website: www.parlogramauctions.com
If you would like to help keep the channel going, you can support us in the following ways:
1. Become a channel member by clicking on this link: / @parlogram
2. Click the 'Thanks' icon below the video and donate an amount of your choice.
3. Join us on Patreon: / parlogram
4. Visit our merch store: / @parlogram
You can get in touch with us using the links below, but please note that we are unable to do online appraisals.
Email: andrew@parlogramauctions.com
Facebook: / parlogram
Twitter: / parlogram
Instagram: / parlogram67
Via our website: www.parlogramauctions.com/Con... - เพลง
Let It Be Naked has become my preferred version of literally all of these songs. It's excellent!
and the original didn't even have "Don't Let Me Down" on it.
It is the first version of the material I became acquainted with - I had always steered clear of the Let It Be album because of the negative comments about the original. I think I had succumbed to the whole negative vibes that had attracted themselves to the original project. Anyway, I really enjoyed it, not being familiar with the original.
Two comments:
1. I think Macca objected to the choir, not the strings.
2. The Naked album was meant to be as if it had been an album from a studio...not what the original disc was.
@@paullestrangeo it was the strings as Paul himself stated he was going to put strings on The Long and Winding Road but, changed his mind. It's in the Get Back doc. Oh and the Choir vocals on Let It Be the song were added by Paul himself. Linda sings as part of it. Someone doesn't research very well before commenting.
@@danerd8978 "Martin added backing vocals from Linda McCartney, at the insistence of Paul, and the resultant mix, with the original solo only, became the "single version" of "Let It Be." On March 26, 1970, producer Phil Spector-called in to save the Get Back/LIB project-remixed "Let It Be," adding his signature orchestra and choir"
Paul had Linda doing some backing (possibly alongside Lennon/Harrison by the sounds of it). NOT a full choir.
Someone doesn't research very well before commenting.
I think it’s sounds really 2003-dated in a lot of places, but whatever lol
This is my preferred version of the album. I personally think that the echo-reverb on John's voice at the end of Across the Universe fits well (with the cosmic theme) and sounds nice
The choir fits more imo.
maybe Across the Universe is simply the best track out of all that mess ? Was it even recorded during Let It Be sessions? I thought it was originally put on some obscure 45 for Unicef or something.
@@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777 Yes, it wasn't recorded during the sessions, it was recorded when they returned from India and several years later released as a single as you say. I remember that they rehearsed an "electric" version of the song during the Let it Be sessions (which I don't like at all, it sounds terrible).
@@NinoJaguar thanks for your reply - I've never even owned Let It Be the album. Never sought it out it never filled out in terms of an interest to me . Heard that version you speak of decades ago and was forgettable. Maybe heard it on the speakers at some coffee shop or something.
@@curly_wyn like how the choir fits in the Stones track 'you can't always get..' . Good timing with stuff like that. then it got overused.
McCartney's motive for Let It Be Naked was to de-Spectorize the album, tighten it up, remove the false starts & abrupt endings, the non-Beatle backup singers and make it sound like a proper studio album. It is a nice listen in that it does sound like the Beatles making a studio record and not capturing live performances. Still, despite the flaws of the original album," the live feel " was the strength of the original Let It Be.
which singers are those?
@@IanRans I assume he means the overdubbed choirs
@@IanRans On "The Long and Winding Road" the producer Phil Spector added female voices which Paul McCartney never liked. Likewise, on "Across the Universe" there is an added choir of male & female voices that are not the Beatles.
No, it's a copy of a 1970 bootleg called GET BACK TO TORONTO, which was for sale before LET IT BE.
the McCartney Agenda 😅
Of all the various releases on various media to emerge from the Get Back sessions, none of them feels satisfyingly official - least of all Phil Spector’s elaborate remix which, lest we forget, came out after the Beatles broke up.
Let It Be Naked is the closest thing to the original brief, and it’s the version I turn to when I fancy listening to these songs. If we can allow the American version of Magical Mystery Tour to become canon and let the original EP fade into obscurity, then this album too has the ability to surpass the Specterrifying version from 33 years earlier.
I read this entire post in your voice.
I completely agree and it's well said. Let It Be wasn't the album they tried to make. The documentary proves they were trying to make a stripped down 'live' sounding album. Spector over produced the original and Naked is the closest we can get to what their original vision was
@@jako1234567890jako As George Martin recommended, the credits should have been printed as:
Produced by George Martin
Overproduced by Phil Spector
The original album can't just be erased. Listen to what you like,but the original album,is the original album. It doesn't need to fade into obscurity like the magical mystery tour ep
Most of the original album is fine, but a few songs have production that really kills it. The echo on the drums in "Let It Be" and the everything Spector did in "Long and Winding Road" in particular.
I'm a former session player who did some production/engineering work, being at my 'peak' during the technical revolution that was the change from analogue to digital recording and related methodologies, meaning I had a solid foot in each camp. A few years ago, I was contacted by old friends at both Sony BMG and UMG to 'remix' or 'remaster' old analogue recordings from the 60s through to the early 80s for re-release as 'Best ofs' and other collections, or just straight albums re-released in a digital format from those eras. The reason I got asked was because I was known to understand both analogue and digital eras and their crossover period, whereas many younger techs and producers brought up entirely in the digital age with a fixation on compression, digital EQ and NR, did not...basically precisely because of the issues you raise in this video. It's been a very nice little earner in my semi-retirement years, and next year, I'm going to teach a few younger (in their 40s!) engineers what I know. Point is, you're right - anything recorded before say, 1981 is at the mercy of engineers and remastering producers who don't understand the nature of the source material.
Thanks Andrew. I had an opportunity to talk to Beatles author and project advisor Bruce Spizer at The Fest For Beatles Fans in Chicago 2008. I mentioned to him that the engineers really needed to back off on the use of noise reduction. Told him that the original tapes were not that noisy to begin with. He listened and maybe the word was passed around. Whether or not my discussing the situation with him had any bearing on the remasters the following year, it sure felt good to let someone in The Beatles camp know how me and many others felt.
Thanks for watching, John and for the interesting comment.
Spot-on review, Andrew. Agree with you 100%. It could have been a fantastic package. On the other hand, I love the new box and my preferred mix for the LIB lp is the Giles version by far
Right on John! It is a lifeless, sterile sound! Also by removing the amusing bits of dialogue on to a separate CD, it destroyed the mood. I much prefer the original Spector version. Removing the orchestra from "Road" would have been sufficient, plus adding the coda to "get back".
I've been put in Specter's place before, and while I've never been a huge fan of Specter, I thought his vision, given what he had, and the vastness that we only now realize, that he didn't do the worst job!
Spizer doesn’t have any control or influence over the sound quality of Beatles releases. He has written liner notes once or twice. That’s about it as far as his “insider” status.
I always thought Glynn Johns idea of including group chat in between the tracks was brilliant, helping the live in the studio vibe. It is sadly missed in Let It Be Naked!
I would have preferred a release of Glyn John's version for comparison. Now his mix was a proposal and would have been expected to be remixed before release. What if we had a mix by Steve Wilson? or... basicallt anybody except Paul! (and I respect Paul but...)
I think Let it be Naked pairs well with the 'get back' documentary. You loose the chatter on the album but you can see them making the album in the documentary. Also in the documentary you can actually see the chatter was just taken from random points and was not actually what they said before each take which disappointed me a bit.
I couldn’t agree less! I think the inclusion of the patter dilutes the quality and integrity of the overall album and songwriting. “Hark the Angels Come….” is a pisstake too far for inclusion on the album. Yes, a laugh in the studio, for sure, but give me a break, it undermines the integrity and sensitivity of Paul’s song.
@@FreedomFlyer689 yeah after seeing the documentary i was quite dissapointed when i realised that the chatter is mostly in the wrong place.
I was interested in hearing Glyn John's version but after hearing it, I really prefer the naked album. John's version seems like a really good outtake album to me. The original Spector album isn't what was originally intended for it to be.
I want this one on vinyl so bad.. It's a pricey one though! Had the CD for years. I'm shocked/disappointed this wasn't reissued for the recent Let Be 50th anniversary boxset. Thanks for the video Andrew!
Thanks for watching and for your continued support!
Same here, want it so bad but in no way I'll pay$300 to $500 for a vinyl album, I don't care who it's by and I find that the sellers got to be pretty greedy asking for that amount of$ for vinyl!
@@alanlafromboise3156It has nothing to do with greed. It's very hard to find so of course it's more expensive
@@LageTH-cam Both
i bought it at a record store for $30 😭
For me, these are / would be the definitive mixes/versions of the following tracks:
'Get Back' = Naked mix, with the coda from the single mix, but without the echo effect
'For You Blue' = Naked mix
'Don't Let Me Down' = Naked version
'I've Got a Feeling' = Naked mix
'One After 909' = Naked mix
'Dig a Pony' = Naked mix
'Two of Us' = Naked mix
'The Long and Winding Road' = Naked version
'Let It Be' = Single mix, with the guitar solos from the single and album mixes playing together, which was how the song was originally intended to sound, before the solo from the album mix was dropped
'I Me Mine' = Naked mix
'Across the Universe' = Naked mix, with all the instruments from the World Wildlife Fund mix, but without the bird sounds or groupie harmony vocals
Both the single and naked mixes of 'Get Back' have their own strengths and weaknesses. The naked mix doesn't have the echo effect which gives it a rawer and cleaner sound. But the single mix has the coda. I wanted to include the naked mix of 'Get Back' on my 1969-70 Beatles compilation, but ultimately went with the single mix because of the coda.
I initially preferred the naked mix of 'Let It Be' to the single mix, because I was going through a phase where the naked mixes and versions were better. But when I rediscovered Linda McCartney's backing vocals on the single mix, I eventually decided I preferred the single mix over the naked mix. The single mix ultimately became the mix I included on my 1969-70 Beatles compilation.
I have come to admit that 'Let It Be' is the one track from the Get Back/Let It Be sessions that actually benefits from having orchestral overdubs added to it. One thing they could have done that they ultimately decided not to do was have the solos from the single and album mixes playing together.
Both the World Wildlife Fund and naked mixes of 'Across the Universe' have their own strengths and weaknesses. The naked mix plays at the correct speed and contains an echo effect starting from the final verse which I really like. And it doesn't have the bird sounds or the groupie harmony vocals. But the World Wildlife Fund mix has fuller instrumentation.
I did consider including the naked mix of 'Across the Universe' on my 1968 Beatles compilation, but ultimately went with the World Wildlife Fund mix, because I felt that it blended in better with the other tracks recorded in 1968.
Yeah, bought this on LP when it came out. I like the archival spirit of this album, and I'm glad McCartney finally got an official release of Long and Winding Road that makes him happy. For me personally, I'll always be partial to the original Let It Be mix that I heard as a kid in the 70s, murky, funereal vibe and all!
@@polycube868 Agree- this album makes that song wonderful. It's their best work when Phil Spector isn't allowed anywhere near it.
I had a strong phase with this album when it was released, first on CD and then I bought the vinyl and loved the oversized booklet on it. Everything sounded so clean and at the same time very fresh. The versions of Don't Let Me Down and The Long And Winding Road just blew my mind. But I have to admit that I did miss the roughness of the original versions of I've Got A Feeling, One After 909 and Let it Be itself. for that reason I adore both albums and choosing one over the other is a matter of the mood I have at the moment.
I picked up a copy of the 2CD set at a car boot sale a couple of weeks ago for 20p!
In fact it was a great haul - for my 5 for £1 I got:
The Beatles - LIB Naked (2CD)
The Beatles - Live at the BBC (2CD)
The Beatles - A Hard Day's Night.
The Who - My Generation (Deluxe Edition 2CD)
Simon & Garfunkel - The Collection (6CD Box set)
Nothing better than staggering around a muddy field at stupid o'clock on a Sunday morning, mildly hungover with the sun in your eyes & picking up a bag full of bargains! Makes it all worthwhile😄 Great video as always Andrew 👍
Yeah wow mate, you did well.
Worth it for the beautiful mix of Across the Universe. The fade out at the end puts it above all other mixes.
Another great video Andrew! I was never a big fan of the original Let it Be album, especially the Spectorized The Long and Winding Road. I actually prefer the Anthology 3 version. To me, Let it Be Naked is much more listenable, especially with the rooftop Don't Let Me Down restored. Peter Jackson's Get Back movie totally changed how I looked at the Get Back sessions and I appreciate the music much more now.
Thanks Vinnie. Glad you enjoyed it!
I kinda agree with with your sentiments here - I haven't listened much to Let it be over the years and couldn't understand why they didn't have the single mix of 'Get Back' on the original album (until I saw 'Get Back'). I didn't really get why there was so much fuss over the Phil Spector orchestration until I heard the Let it be...naked album. On my Naim system it sounded great!
To address Andrew's points, I wasn't aware of the remastering issues - and to be honest although I haven't had a chance to hear all the Giles Martin remixes of recent years I'm not too keen on interfering with the original sound, AI or not. I think the original tapes should be processed through the best ADC equipment available to get what was on the original tape onto the CD/sound file and then left alone.
this is my favorite youtube channel. The amount of effort you put is insane. Keep on the good work! Thank you for contributing to the Beatles legacy.
Thank you. Much appreciated!
I read a great way to approach Let It Be a while ago: think of the Naked version as the studio album and the original version as a Soundtrack version. Then you can have both and they both have their value.
Personally, I don't listen to the original version anymore - including the recent Giles Martin version. The Naked version is the only one I listen to. But that's just my personal preference.
I love this album. I am glad Apple put it out. You finally hear how it should be heard. I bought this on cd and it sounds fantastic. Thanks for reviewing it.
Thanks for watching, Bob!
Honestly, my go-to version of Let it Be is the highlights disc included in the 2 cd set that came out last year. It compiled a lot of the best material from the bigger boxset and made it into a nice collection of tracks. It feels kind of like an alternate version of the Let it Be album, even if that wasn't the intentions.
Better than the originally released. I have never liked the schmalz of Long and winding road. The raw version of simple piano playing is great.
My grip was the fly on the wall disc . I wanted hear full versions of songs presented whenever it was possible
I LOVE this album. I actually enjoy the noise reduction and the clean feel and sound. The improved Across the Universe alone is worth picking this up, it's definitely the best version of the song. I also think this version of Let it Be has the best solo.
Agree. As Paul indicated, it doesn't sound like a recording of the Beatles. It sounds like you are in the studio with the Beatles.
Overzealous use of noise reduction and gating IMO. The rooftop recordings don't even sound like they were performed outside, in the open air!
@@shakcohen4302 Have you ever heard a concert in open air? Nowdays they are pretty good, but even in the 70's the sound was horrible.
@@nu385 then where are the chatters? doesn't make sense to remove them in exactly that kind of version. Too clean and no warmth.
@@ricardo_miguel13 If you want the chatters, then you've got the original album. This is not that.
When...When will Apple realize they need Andrew to sit in with them during all releases going further?? He knows what the fans love and knows The Beatles catalogue more than they do even it seems! Love you man, keep on keeping on!
I really like this album. It's that "dry" sound, that you talk about Andrew, that does it for me. See I collect reel to reel tape recorders. I've put this album on a 5 inch reel, in mono, and it sounds brilliant, when played on machines as old as dirt. Watching this video reminded me that I haven't listened to it in a while. Maybe this time I'll record it on a cassette and see how it comes out.
I enjoy transferring to tape or MD to hear if 'feels' better. Ironic to think engineers spend all that effort removing noise so we can see if it sounds better when we put it back in!
This was the first Beatles' album I ever bought, and my go-to version until the 2021 Mix came out. It's the best of the "reimagined" Beatles' albums, the second being "Yellow Submarine Songtrack"
Remixed. Only Naked and Love are a reimagining.
Another great video Andrew. I preferred Naked to the Original. I loved the box set also so happy to have them both out there
Love this album. Bought the CD on release. Sounds great. I was even listening to it last week.
From comments on forums the issue with it only seems to be the slightly dead sound cause by too much digital scrubbing and the idiotic quick fade outs. The reverb is kinda wonky also. I reworked this album by adding some harmonic enhancement and editing back on the full ending and the result is superb. They need to reissue this with the noise reduction dialed back a bit and restore the proper endings. Otherwise it's a fine album.
The Get Back footage is the most important footage ever released on the Beatles. Thank goodness they filmed so much. I wish they did it for every album. Imagine if they filmed Peppers like that. Been waiting 50 years for the get Back footage and it was worth the wait. I hope they release more. Would like to see all the Abbey Road songs that they were working on. That would be interesting. I bought the Black album back in the day and was amazed to hear the music. Back in the day. Keep up the great work. I wish you would do a weekly bootleg day of the loads of rare track on bootleg CD`s from the 1990`s and comment on the music on those CD`s. We heard so much on the albums they released. It is time you get down and dirty with the rare studio material on the boots from Yellow Dog and other labels. Just a thought. If any one would like to hear your wonderful comments on a wider range of great Beatles music. Let them know your thoughts.
As I commented the other day, I miss the dialogue of the original, but you've reminded me that it has a whole CD of dialogue - and I think I played that once, on the day of release, and never thought about it again!
PS. Psychedelia at Abbey Road is one of my fave comps of all time!
I prefer Let it Be Naked, but I certainly agree with your criticisms.
There is just something about the material The Beatles had at this time that almost demands a ‘Naked’ version!
Very well put together video brother!❤
Thank you, Michael!
I have said before that I would love to have your hearing. I virtually lost my hearing overnight about 4 years ago. I hear everything in mono and slightly distorted. I used to love listening to all the subtle differences on beatles tracks, but my impaired hearing has given me a strange ability to recognise the clearer beatles recordings. "Let It Be...Naked" for me is at the top of the tree. The equivalent for me anyway of your Hor Zu "Magical Mystery Tour".
Wonderful video again Andrew
Than you, Steve. Much appreciated!
I really like the detour around the 11 minute mark where Andrew examines the regrettable noise reduction craze of the 90s and early aughts. It's funny to think about today, when producers will artificially add tape hiss to give the music that DIY, "found sound," or "vintage" aesthetic. But I probably liked this sterile noise-reduced sound back then, just as Paul did; the whole culture was hailing the coming digital age. I was thrilled to be downloading low-quality (pirated) mp3s of individual songs, rather than having to buy albums. At last we were free from the shackles of analog technology! Now, of course, it's hard to express how much we cherish old analog stuff. It's gone beyond nostalgia to a kind grief, a yearning for a physical world that will never return.
Even with the recent Let It Be reissues, this is still my favorite version of the album. Love the sequencing and alternate cover design. Still own it on vinyl.
I bought the CD when it came out, most of it is amazing.
It is my favorite over the original version
The long and winding road brought tears to my eyes when I heard it clean
There was one interesting fix on Let It Be with a sour note on the piano that was corrected. I'm always on the fence with these things. Do you fix it or are you tampering with history? I sort of got used to the little minor faults. John's slightly flat vocal or messed up guitar were so minor that repairing them was really unnecessary. The interesting part of the album was combining the two different live takes of I've Got a Feeling and Don't Let Me Down. I think Paul was really interested in making an album that was up-to-date with the times. If that's the case then it was well done. Aside from the over-the-top noise reduction, which was unnecessary, it is still an album of great songs. That's the important thing to remember. As always, great upload!
I think it was a very good idea to do a revised version of the album so that we could hear what it was supposed to be, conceptually, without Phil Spector's mucking about. Rather than sounding sterile or airless I think it sound clean and uncluttered. As I have both the original and the Naked versions, I don't need to choose; I can listen to either one when I'm in the mood for one or the other.
Definitely worthy - it’s a much more complete and polished album, and the stripped down tracks, especially The Long And Winding Road sound much better than the overblown originals. That said, I did enjoy the 2021 remix too - it sounded much, much better than the original mix in my opinion.
Insightful video again, thanks! I liked it at the time when I was 17/18, as it was new, but it’s basically a passion project. The main thing for me was including Don’t Let Me Down (how that was that left off original is unbelievable to me) and I love the version of Across The Universe. The artwork hasn’t aged well and since the Get Back film, it makes the whole thing seem a little insignificant.
Just want to say that I *love* your channel! Thanks for all you do!😊
Very interesting video as always! I agree, the days of No-Noise / CEDAR overuse produced some very subpar masters. However, for all their faults, those EMI noise reduced CDs at least tried to retain the original dynamics of the recordings, which IMO makes them more pleasant to listen to than today's heavily brickwalled reissues.
This might be my preferred version of the album. Mainly because of the inclusion of dont let me down and the exclusion of unnecessary chat & mini songs.
I like all three versions of the album, because it's a different listening experience... However, it's nice the alternate takes of "The Long And Winding Road" and "Let It Be" used on Naked, got another "remix" for '21. Awesome video, as always 🎶
What a great topic for discussion! You always come up with really good ideas.
Absolutely another informative video Handsome. Love that you always give a fair and impartial review.
Let It Be .. Naked came out when I was at the end of high school. I am no audiophile so I was naive to the noise reduction issues. I loved the album. Hearing the Fly on the Wall stuff later got me into finding the Get Back bootlegs.
Of course, I now enjoy the Glyn Johns 2021 mix of Get Back more than Naked. But - Naked will always have a sentimental place for me.
The cd of Let it Be Naked was my only copy of Let it Be for years, and the first version of the album I got into as a teenager. It’s the best version of the record IMO and I’m still waiting patiently for a vinyl reissue.
The research, writing and production on your channel is astonishing. Thank you for another superb episode.
Glad you enjoyed it, Samuel!
It’s great to be able to listen to and compare both versions of this album. The songwriting is so good that most of the tracks sound great on both.
A teenager in Brazil, I was a bit disappointed when I bought the first pressing of the CD and the content on the discs was switched: the "Fly On The Wall" disc actually contained the songs! I was not impressed at first, but I came to like the aIbum later.
I think about it as "Let It Be Live", since it gave us some rawer and "liver" material from the Rooftop Concert. It's definitely a different and worthy listening experience.
I wonder how wide spread this disc error was? One of the many things I've learnt from this most excellent channel is... any Beatles release containing some kind of balls up could be worth a lotta dosh!))
Thank you, Andrew. I appreciate all the work you have done for us Beatles fans. Your videos are always very entertaining and full of valuable information. Cheers !
Cheers Scott!. Glad you like them.
Thanks as always Andrew for another great video. This album for me was worth the price of admission for the alternate versions of Let It Be, The Long and Winding Road, and Across the Universe. I love the de-Spectorization. Not that I don’t enjoy the originals, but these were a breath of fresh air. Add to that the inclusion of the much more raw and live version of Don’t Let Me Down, and it was an instant winner for me!
See you on the next one! Cheers!
Andrew, fantastic information as always. Thank you.
I too have little against the original Let It Be but I've always thought that Naked has it's place and over the past 10 years I've probably pulled it out more than Let It Be. I had one of the bootleg Glyn Johns versions back in the mid 70's so when Naked came out it was a welcomed replacement for that LP.
As always, Great video! I love all the different versions of Let It Be, but “Naked” is my favorite version of the album. Maybe it’s due for a remastering.
Another great video Andrew. Thank you. I remember getting this album for Christmas when it came out. Like you, I quite liked to original Let It Be album and found Naked to be interesting but sonically dry. I'm going to put it on my hard drive and give it a play. Thanks again. I love your content.
I really like the version of Across the Universe on Naked. It's worthy just for that track.
I thought it was a great album when it came out as it was good to finally get the film version of the Long & Winding Road plus I thought the reverb at the end of Across The Universe was a nice touch. Given that the Get Back album eventually came out as part of the box set, the Naked version is probably less relevant now although the CD is a good option still if you don't fancy paying for the recent Let It Be boxed set.
I had a 5.1 mix of it and made my own stereo mix from that. There are ways you can take the best of both world's and craft a decent Get Back / Let It Be 14 track LP that fits perfectly with everything else and still has the raw session feel.. First, If you are used to the Pygmy line opening the album, craft that into the GB comment of 'straight into I Got a Fever' line and you got Dig a Pony and I Got a Feeling opening the album, For You Blue, (LetIt Be version but with the Get Back opening talk put back in. 'Queen says no...FBI' comment right before Dig It since it has FBI in it, Use the GB long version of that, the link 'All The Angels Come talk into Let It Be, Long And Winding Road, and then Across the Universe is song 7 for side 1 -- Side 2 Start off with I Me Mine, Two Of Us and Maggie Mae...that oldie connecting to their own oldie One After 909, Rocker from the Get Back album, since its an improv more than direct cover, cant use Save The Last Dance at all-to avoid copyrights - but can use the link dialogue into Don't Let Me Down then use the album studio talk before Get Back but then have the single version with the reprise still attached to the end, but crossfade to the rooftop end to close the album rooftop. Which puts Get Back as track 7 for the album with the long singe version and the Let It Be short version being part of that whole of the song. Poof 14 song version of Get Back Let It Be and it wouldn't stray from-and would be in the middle of - both versions of the albums. You also have george with one track per side, and you have John's strong track closing side 1 and Paul's Livelier one ending side 2 -- also note: right before their solo careers, it'd show John can write slow songs at end of side 1 and Paul can write faster ones at the end of side 2 as myth killers. It also has the best of the two album openers, and the best of both album endings while keeping a flow and songs still grouped together that from similar session days to give the raw bare bones sound. yet can still get away with which ever Long Winding Road and Across Universe version a person prefers. You could still listen straight through the album in that order and not feel like you need to skip a track. ,
Anywhere to listen to this? ;)
I have this on the cassette version and the sound is good - clean and clear as you could reasonably expect from a mass produced tape. The conversation section, Side B, is fascinating as The Beatles discuss what they might do in the future.
Naked was my regular listen for this album for years. The Giles remix supplanted it for a spell, but for some time now, the 80s CD is my go-to.
I always consider this version of Let it Be more cannon in my Beatles Discography. The inclusion of Don't Let Me Down is the greates decision they've made on this record.
But they chose the live version on the roof while the singles a side get back was the studio version on the album. They should have went with the studio version of don't let me down and the right solo of let it be like on the original version.
@@mariuspoppFM I do hahah
I agree totally. Always thought it sounded sterile. Always prefered the original album.
My nan went in with me to buy this lp from The Beatles Shop in 2003. LIBN is the definitive mix and sounds lovely on vinyl.
The CD these days costs next to nothing and isn't too shabby either. :}
I consider Let It Be Naked to be the much better and authentic version of the Let It Be sessions. Apart from the order of the tracks, which I personally find more sensible, I also think the remixes are very good, although they may be a bit thin in sound. The voices are much clearer and more precise. For you Blue seems natural, bluesy because the acoustic guitar wasn't cut out.
The Long and Winding Road in particular has such a beautiful sound, thanks to George's soulful Leslie guitar playing and Ringo's drums, which is a bit too much in the original version. Not to forget Billy Preston's piano playing, which gives the song another bell-like sound. His piano solo is also a blessing. Overall, the take from January 31st is much cleaner and doesn't seem as downplayed as the original. Paul's singing is also softer and more beautiful. This version shows how great these four can sound together, plus Billy Preston as a special guest on top. This doesn't need any orchestra and choir overdub.
I've got a feeling sounds better in my opinion because of the mix of the two takes. John's guitar playing is more reserved in take 2 of the rooftop performance and therefore not as dirty. Paul's vocals are mostly cleaner in take 2. Because of the remix, the version sounds much more like soul. That's what I like about it.
Across the universe sounds wonderful and authentic, thanks to the right speed. The atmosphere is perfect due to the Hammond organ and the tanpura. I'm sure John would have been happy with this version. N let it be, I like the mix of the two takes. This not only provides for the different guitar solo, but also for small differences in Paul's vocal part and the organ.
I like Let It Be Naked much more than the original, but that's because I knew this version first, which I'm sure we all feel the same way about.
Keep up your great, informative and professional videos, Andrew. I hope you might have a say in the future remixes of the Beatles albums😉
Thank you! Let's see what lies on the road ahead 😉
Bought it as soon as it came out. I love it. I love the original as it was one of my first album purchases, so it's like an old friend; I especially love the guitar solo on the Let it Be song, which sounds suspiciously more like McCartney than Harrison to my ears. Great to have Winding Road without the Spector "goop".
Let It Be Naked felt like The Beatles getting back in the studio after Abbey Road and giving it one final attempt. And it worked!
Though ofc technically it was *before* Abbey Road. But I get what you mean! 👍
Yeh. Let It Be was recorded first then put on the shelf because...well...I bet the Beatles felt it was not up to snuff and full of bad vibes (watching the Get Back footage, i find McCartney intolerably bossy and vain (swishing his long hair about in front of the cameras). Then there was the infamous cookie incident in which Yoko Ono...wait for it....took a cookie from George without asking, causing George to yet again leave the group ;)
So...they pulled their sox up and did Abbey Road. THEN...the higher ups in the business released Let It Be. You can see by their hair, that the Let It Be/Get Back period is closer looking to their White Album period. By the time they recorded Abbey Road, George and John's hair is practically down to their waist. And it looks like Macca has been getting fed well by his new missus cos he's defo put on some weight!
Great video Andrew. I've been enjoying and watching your videos for some time now.
It may be worth noting that when Let It Be...Naked was released in 2003 it was also released on cassette. In fact, this was the last Beatles album that had an official Apple/Parlophone cassette release in Europe. I actually have a sealed copy of the European cassette release. The only other offical Apple/Parlophone cassette release after this was The Beatles Love album, but this was only available in Indonesia.
They did the same "corrections" to some of the audio for the 1 compilation. Good catch.
Great observations Andrew!
I agree with you completely. I think LIB Naked is an interesting document of the album, but it isn’t the original for me.
I to love Spector’s final production and cut of the album. Spector made that music come to life with the orchestra and the beautiful slowing down of Across The Universe.
Now that we live in the day of outtakes and bonus tracks, it seems “Naked” is a great companion, but nothing more.
I can’t help but think this is the way it was meant to be. The Beatles unplugged and raw. I absolutely love it! If nerves hadn’t been so raw, this is very likely what we would have gotten and probably with George Martin at the helm.
Been waiting for a NAKED video for a while, cheers!!
Interestingly enough, years ago growing up, i was introduced to the beatles (other than hold your hand, etc.) and was never a big fan. This fan introduced me to them by showing me Long and Winding Road. Was not a fan and was completely turned off.
Years later, re-introduced to the Beatles with the song Dear Prudence by chance at work and asked Who is that?
I cannot stop listening to the Beatles now and they have completely changed my mind on their music.
I found out about Let It Be Naked and found the concept interesting and threw on that song that completely turned me off years ago. In this stripped down version, everything is clearer and feels more Beatlish than all the heavy orchestra and whatnot. Absolutely LOVE the song now and am amazed by how powerful the notes (once buried) are, now freed. ❤️ the content and we can all agree, Beatles forever
-channelnow
Great episode, Andrew! I thoroughly enjoy LIBN! I’m glad they included “Don’t Let Me Down” from the rooftop. I actually prefer the remix of “The Long and Winding Road” without the orchestra. I wish they had included “Dig It” and “Maggie May”. “Get Back” does sound a bit awkward with the abrupt ending. - Roger
Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it.
I agree! The Naked album sounded sterile, thin and lifeless. The only highlight for me was Across the Universe, which I thought was an improvement from the original.
i agree a little, but in my case, maybe thats because of the TERRIBLE cover
@@evertvdb000 I know - that cover is awful.
Thanks Andrew! Despite its shortcomings like the noise reduction and digital mastering, I really loved Let It Be Naked when it came out. I bought the vinyl and played it quite often, preferring the stripped down sound of the tracks over the Phil Spector versions. Like many fans, I grew up with the original orchestrated versions, and I certainly don't hate them, but I knew that the Beatles were not satisfied with Spector's heavy hand in dealing with the material, so when Naked came out I felt like I was, for the first time, getting to hear what was intended by them.
I'm hoping for a get back album. What I heard in that documentary, I wanted a complete version instead of snippets.
Great video on this collection Andrew! I remember when this was released and bought it on CD right away. I do prefer Let It Be and Long and Winding Road off this album but I prefer the original for everything else. I was lucky to get the vinyl version in 2010;for around $30 so I am glad to own that. Might be worth revisiting. Take care
Thanks very much, Bill, glad you enjoyed it!
So you don't mind that "Don't Let Me Down" was left off on the original album for it? was criminal back then to leave it off.
Exceptional video. It's a masterpiece! The way it was ment to be. Should be remixed and reissued. Surprisingly the brains at Apple didn't delete it like Hey Jude which was triple Platinum. I'd like that to be brought back and re released as well. Thanks for all your hard work!
Thank you. Glad you enjoyed it!
Superb Andrew just catching this one now! 👍👍
I always look forward to your postings. I wish they would have made some sort of reissue box set with a book of photos. Believe it or not I love all the issues of this album. I never knew the power of certain mixes. When I hear the 1st album it brings me to the moment my dad took me to Times Sq. In Manhattan to see the movie. After we saw it he purchased for me the album and we celebrated by eating a Hot Dog & drank a Root beer soda! I treasure the LIB Naked! ❤
I'm an avid Beatles fan and somewhat of a purist and I was turned onto this album by a friend of mine some years ago. I absolutely love it. Personally, I much prefer it to the Spector record. It has so much humanity (even with the Pro Tools fixes!) compared to the original release. I wonder what a "naked" version of "All Things Must Pass" might sound like. Sacrilege, perhaps?
That boat has sailed, I believe. If they didn't do it while remixing the album for the 50th anniversary edition, I don't think they will ever do it.
@@VMBFV The 50th anniversary version is a bit of a failure, IMO, since it lacks some high and low frequencies of the previous issue.
Anthology 3 is probably the closest to a stripped down version, with Take 2 chosen; only George and (most likely) Rocky.
The remixed ATMP 50th anniversary version still has too much bloody echo and some of the mixes are no better or less murky than the Spectorized original. Even still I wonder what Jeff Lynne would do with ATMP if given a 100 % control to remix every thing from the tracking tapes and create a new dry and punchy master mix.
@@seid3366 who is Rocky ? 🤡
Man, me and my uncle have debating this for years. He hates remixes and always prefers the original and in this case I completely agree with him. I love the original “Let It Be” the way it was/is.😊
the closest to original mixdown is purist and just fine. too much marketing going on all the time with Beatles INC. And to hear the analogue source is ...well analogous to that purity of sound regardless of 'noise' since noise was in the building. People have become so stilted with cleanliness but you ever see what they eat? 😅
The problem with your uncle's reasoning is that Let It Be wasn't the original version 😅 First release but not original idea.
Both Get Back and Let It Be albums were aptly titled.
@@GregoryKeithe what he means is he’d rather listen to the original albums as they were released and doesn’t care for any upgrades or remixes.
I'd say Let It Be... Naked is still worth getting for two tracks: Don't Let Me Down and For You Blue. The version of DLMD is mostly take 1 from the rooftop concert with a bit from the second take of the last verse edited in to make the most complete version. The version of For You Blue also puts George's acoustic guitar track back in, which I always found odd that Phil Spector removed on his remix. It was also the first time we would hear Take 19 of The Long and Winding Road from the Let It Be film as an official audio recording, though Giles Martin would later include it in the Super Deluxe Edition of Let It Be in 2021. Additionally, I personally prefer the Naked track order than Spector's Track order - I think Get Back is a better opener and Let It Be a better closing track than starting with Two of Us and ending with Get Back, though I understand the reason Spector saved Get Back as the last track was due to the fact that it was the final song performed on the Rooftop concert.
I like it. Turn it up loud and hear the band not horns, violins etc. I also like the original but when it comes time for a listen … I get Naked
I loved this album. I liked the removal of string scores. The Beatles never needed a pop orchestral background
These reimaginings are not obsolete. It's just a good remix.
I agree with your assessment. I like what Phil Specter did with the original tapes. While I appreciate Paul's desire to release an album that remained true to his original vision, it sounds, quite frankly, like a collection of demos.
Andrew, I just wanted to say I love your channel. Thank you.
Thanks. I really appreciate that!
It's been a long, long time. Must hear it again soon.
buena andrew !!!...este video esta muy bueno...pero en mi humilde opinion creo que el album "let it be naked" rescata exactamente lo que el grupo original planeaba lo cual nos muestra su verdadera esencia y no la version retocada y sobre maquillada de phill spector
I love this album. Best version of Let It Be to date.
I have no idea what is so special about this album. The only thing "naked" about it is the strings have been omitted from The Long and Winding Road. I sold mine not long after I got it.
I love the details for each song and album
I really wish they’d reissue ‘Let It Be… Naked’ on vinyl. It’s the best version of the album even if it’s not the best sounding but I’ve got a feeling we’ll never see this one on store shelves again.
Yeah you're right it sounds sterile. I donated it to charity. Love the original album.
I agree with your opinions here, Andrew. Fixing John's phrasing and guitar ("just because they can") is revolting and really is letting down the whole point of a "back to the basics"-album. As an idea, 'Let It Be ... Naked' could have worked as a supplementary disc along with the original album - at least in order to please Paul. For most artists that would do. Period. It's just that with the Beatles they can't resist creating so much buzz about it. I really never understood why they would have to make a completely new album out of it. And although I liked the new mix of Across The Universe, I couldn't help thinking towards the end during the fading: - Do they really expect us to believe this ain't just another PRODUCTION? Come on, they didn't have reverbs like that available in 1970. Not even Phil. Also, I feel obliged to set the record straight concerning the nr. 1 hit single The Long And Winding Road: The orchestra and choir was NOT arranged by Phil Spector. Rather, he indeed produced and endorsed the arrangement, which was scored by Richard Hewson. I have never believed for a second that the latter (nor Phil Spector, for that matter) did that job to insult Paul McCartney. And of course, one year later Paul contacted Hewson to do the instrumental version of 'Ram' (which ended up being released as 'Thrillington' in 1977). So, at least as arranger skills were concerned, Paul cannot have put those into question. Don't forget that John Lennon and George Harrison brought in Phil Spector to save a forthcoming soundtrack album which the Beatles couldn't agree upon. Glyn Johns' two sloppy album suggestions, finally released a couple of years ago, are all too revealing and in my opinion tells us why. Lennon said afterwards that Spector made something out of it (the Let It Be album), and I have truly missed his and Harrison's voice of opinion about it for decades. I think what happened during the post-production phase of 'Let It Be' is just another sad tale of communication breakdown and hurted egos. Sure, The Long And Winding Road is also nice enough without the orchestra. But then again, the Beatles are barely touching their instruments on it (except the grand piano) and sounds like they are afraid to disturb the guests in a hotel lobby (indeed, Ringo added a full drum kit along with Phil and the orchestra - why haven't he ever defended that?). Well, to be fair to Paul: If he wanted to prove his point, he really did so marvelously and with magic results already in 1975-76 when he took The Long And Winding Road with him on the road with Wings. Listen to the beautiful rendition on 'Wings Over America', and perhaps you'll see what I mean. The arrangement with that band and the horns is subtle and classy, certainly done with taste and feeling. 14 years later, Paul may had forgotten though. The live version of 'The Long And Winding Road' off of the Tripping The Live Fantastic live album is strikingly close to the 'Let It Be' version in quite a crowdpleasing way, although this time it's done with synthesizer pads all over it ...
On a side note, I really like the olde timey film look of your graphics. Keep those coming! One more thing, now that you can give us little snippets of actual recordings, I'd love to see your take on some of the differences that you've noted over the years with the examples given like you did on this episode. For instance, differences in mono and stereo mixes or maybe just different pressings such as from US and UK.
It’s what Paul McCartney intended.
When i was a child, 5 years old, i discovered the Beatles. I remember the first time i heard the Original Let it Be LP. My thoughts were that it was a "dirty sound" and a "sad album". My opinion about the Original Let it Be remains unchanged until now, 42 years later. When i heard the Let it be Naked CD for the first time i thought that sounded clear, expanded, happy as the other Beatles albums sound. My opinion about Let it Be naked remains unchanged until now.
Thanks for another good and well made video.
However, this time I completely disagree with the conclusion: I clearly prefer the Naked version of Let It Be.
And although taste is individual, I find the following factors hard to argue against:
1) The unimportant little filler numbers are gone, as is the chatter which is unnecessary/disturbing to the music,
2) "Don't Let Me Down" is included (inexplicable decision to leave it out!).
3) The order of tracks is just more correct (starting with "Get Back" and ending with "Let It Be"),
4) And then the whole "naked" idea (without the Spectorization) is much more in line with what The Beatles tried with "Get Back" - as documented in Peter Jackson's 8 hour video: Returning to the roots and being a live band .
Remember also that Ringo, George and Yoko Ono - and Paul of course - backed the "Naked" project.
I have the album in the vinyl version and the sound is quite good.
Me too! Andrew maybe you are in the minority here :-)
Paul Hicks is Tony Hick’s son (The Hollies).