Air Canada flight lands in San Francisco after being told not to
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 พ.ค. 2024
- An investigation is underway into why Air Canada Flight 781 ignored repeated orders by a San Francisco air traffic controller to abort a landing.
To read more: www.cbc.ca/1.4368724
»»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: bit.ly/1RreYWS
Connect with CBC News Online:
For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage: bit.ly/1Z0m6iX
Find CBC News on Facebook: bit.ly/1WjG36m
Follow CBC News on Twitter: bit.ly/1sA5P9H
For breaking news on Twitter: bit.ly/1WjDyks
Follow CBC News on Instagram: bit.ly/1Z0iE7O
Download the CBC News app for iOS: apple.co/25mpsUz
Download the CBC News app for Android: bit.ly/1XxuozZ
»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
For more than 75 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.
"Air traffic control sounded panicked" - To be honest I thought that guy sounded very calm and a tad bit annoyed.
And the Controler was talking very fast. I had a hard time understanding: X 6!
As a former navy atc I would have been furious
@@catherinenelson4162 they sped it up I think. from what I remember a video on it with the atc in real-time he wasn't talking that fast
@@catherinenelson4162 That's how they always talk
If you hear many ATC, you will know their tone is always constant and calm. There was panick in his voice.
Air traffic controller: " air Canada 781, go around."
Air traffic controller. " air Canada 781, go around."
Pilot : " shhhh"
Air traffic controller. " air Canada 781, go around."
Pilot :" chill bro..I already parked"
Michline Al I realize you're kidding, but it was pretty clear, he said "copy that."
Microsoft FSX in a nutshell
This is air Canada 781, we had our speaker blown out from turbulence, so we landed anyway.
he definitely said copy that
Michline Al i think cocaine was on the airplane😂
That was panic in the controller's voice?? If that was panic that was the most chill panic I've ever heard. I'm glad everyone is ok.
Look on the bright side, at least Air Canada isn't dragging passengers off flights or killing pets.
Halina Li They're risking their passenger's life, The plane could be shot down by the military if they make mistakes like that.
Before Tommorow first of all, they wouldn’t call the military for a plane making an unauthorized landing. They’d get the authorities to the plane
if its true they missed another passenger loaded jet by 18m., then they nearly killed hundreds.
..no bright side to incompetence that nearly killed hundreds..
Nope just endangering thousands of lives
The way she says 28R is mildly infuriating
toowenty ayyyyyyyte
Timestamp please?
@@walterbrunswick 0:28
A likely explanation is that the Air Canada crew could see the previous aircraft was clearing the runway and thought that if they waited and continued the approach that maybe the controller would reverse his command. Perhaps they were tired and thought the controller was being overly cautious. It can happen that way but very unlikely. Also, there could have been something else making the landing unsafe, debris on the runway reported by the previous aircraft, for example.
Or they might not have heard the controller because they had the volume turned down somehow. They didn’t see the lights because they weren’t looking for them.
In any case the AC crew has got some explaining to do.
memez_r_dreamz twenty eight R
Simple: Air traffic controller didn't end his sentences with "...eh."
ZlayaCo6aka Hahahahaha eh
ZlayaCo6aka Thanks! Now I know 'eh' is Canadian for 'over'.
Lol
th-cam.com/video/ZVmgAcaPE8o/w-d-xo.html
Eh is confirmation
The FAA concluded after speaking to the flight crew and probing other data that the “crew inadvertently switched from the SFO tower frequency to the SFO ground frequency after receiving their landing clearance.”
“The FAA deemed this event to be an isolated occurrence and not reflective of any systematic deficiencies at Air Canada,” according to a FAA spokesman.
Pilot error then. The runway is still tower controlled. Make it a procedure to let the tower know that you are switching to ground. Just saying. Cant just say this is an isolated incident until it becomes a disastrous accident.
Eagle Beast Of course the runway it tower controlled. But ATC has different sections, aircraft can contact Ground, Departures or Arrivals, so after getting clearence to land they switched automatically to Ground frequency cause they were technically about to touch ground.
And the manual signalling to not land?
@@killacam876 A red light from the tower way off the approach path in a field full of red lights. See other comments on that by actual pilots.
@@marquisdemoo1792 a mistake happening I can understand, but the multiple consecutive mistakes in this instance is something completely irresponsible. Being at the point of having to fall back on sending visual signals by itself makes them look bad, but to not even be able to rely on that... They shouldn't have to focus to the point of being unable to see signals given by the tower, unless they switched off of their instrument landing system and decided to land manually. Why the hell would they do that though? Do Canadian airlines not use audio boards with multiple inputs that allow you to monitor multiple frequencies simultaneously? They may have to change frequencies depending on the airport but once they are set up on all channels they should not have to change frequencies between talking to ATC or ground crews. Now certainly they could have turned the volume down on the input that they are connected to ATC on, though I dont see how they could accidentally do that.
...ATC didn't say EH at the end of each sentence, nothing more
Grim Reaper 🥴😁
And this is why air traffic controlers work 3 days and get 4 off. The amount of stress must be crazy!! Holy cow!
9,000 hour pilot here. There was no DEVIATION offense, here. More like Controller Error. This "It's always the pilot's fault" crap has got to stop. The controller messed up his landing deck, didn't get the runway cleared in time, and needed AC781 to help him fix it.
All 6 instructions to "Go around" occurred within 30 seconds. The Pilot, copilot, and flight engineer are all listening on the radio. For all three of them to miss 6 instructions in 30 seconds indicates that they did not hear the instructions. i.e. they did lose radio contact.
Light Gun Signal? Who is kidding whom? The red light gun signal is a 6" FLASHLIGHT from inside the tower, which is over a mile from the end of the runway, way to the left of the pilot's vision. Nobody is going to see that. Pilots are not trained to look at the tower for landing instructions.
Flying into an airport, at night looks like a Christmas tree of lights. The pilot was cleared to land. His concentration is on the lights at the touchdown zone. Not the tower.
Who is investigating the controller?
Replies in this thread have banned words and have been censored.
Threewulphmoon Lies
then why, before i replied, when i clicked view replies ; nothing appeared?
replies are kinda wonky lately. I hit it several times before it opened. kinda like SFO huh?
Even this one which should have ended up under Threewulphmoon ended up here.
Apparently these pilots are being accused of disobeying directions from the tower. Surely the possible consequences are dire so what would be their motivation for doing so deliberately?
Because the pilot & copilot wanted an on time for their flight. Check the flight recorder.
They wanna pee, now!
It was molson time
The pilots can overrule any instruction they are called captains for a reason.
@@gsmjr8502 no it’s not it’s because they fumbled the radio frequency and switched to ground so they didn’t do it on purpose listen to the atc lol
Ok as a commercial pilot (funny to see wannabes in the comments) I've had avionics failure. It happens. Mic's get stuck. If you're on short final you're not looking for signals from tower. Especially during that critical phase of flight. It happens. Not directly the pilots fault. Equipment failure is uncontrollable. Glad everyone touched down safely.
John Doe
Your alias tells the whole story. However, You did not even begin to explain how they failed to respond to the red landing lights.
Larry Tischler He just said, (might be slightly paraphrased, my memory isn’t great) “When you’re on short final you’re not looking for signals on the tower”.
Trust me, the light in the tower is not what you are looking for even if you could see it from a couple miles away when your on short final in a jetliner. It is not like some super powerful laser beam, it is a overgrown flashlight way off the side of your cone of vision when your on approach.
Matthew Elyash in any job you can get tunnel vision as its routine to focus on a task and exceptions do not register, its human. You would have to make a bon fire on the runway for people to break out of their routine.
John Doe thanks John! Nice to read from a real pilots point! Blessings
Captain Sum Ting Wong was at the controls...
Should have been in French, screamed into the mic, with wild hand-gestures.
air canada bonne nuit 781 aller autour
They were busy eating escargot 🐌 I guess!
@@EdD-iflyFl500 look at that s car go.
Andrew Emery 😆😆
Omg I lost it reading this comment! 😂
The ATC f'ed up. We should have said, "Canada 781 go around eh?"
Denis O'Brien The big deal is that the Air Canada flight staff did not follow the FAA rules. The flight recorder comms should be reviewed.
If the flight crew decided that they were in charge of the landing, they should be held accountable and should be banned from flight into or out of the United States period.
“Sorry” is no excuse for their actions which endangered hundreds of passengers’ lives. Period.
I know the comment is 1 year old, but we don't all say EH! excuse me as I ride away on my Moose!
He smelled back bacon.
What do you expect, its Canada, they dont know anything!!! It happened twice, scary!
@@TheWolfsnack the big deal???? Are you serious???? Remember Tariffe crash!
That lawyer is definitely more lawyer than he is pilot. The light gun signal argument is irrelevant. If the flight crew's story is that they truly never heard any further radio transmissions after they were cleared to land, which is completely normal, then why the hell would they think to look at the tower for light signals??
Because they are supposed to do so
Lyzander911 they are supposed to look at the runway so that they will actually SEE where they land. And let’s say that the pilot is controlling the yoke, then the copilot usually does the throttle and the minor things which means that it is hard to look at the tower AND land the plane
StandardMeta, meant to look at the tower just in case they are signalling, why? They had been cleared to land, they hadn’t received the “go around” so they believed that they could land, just because the controller transmitted the go around does not mean they received it, and even if they knew they had radio malfunction they are not going to initiate a go around because of that, in fact that would be more dangerous than carrying on with a landing that was cleared. If they had gone around because of radio failures they could have taken a flight path that took them on a collision course with another, maybe larger, aircraft. It is probably procedure that if you loose communication with the tower you obey the last instruction heard, in this case it was cleared to land.
Excellent point that so many don’t or won’t admit is the reality of the incident, if they knew that they had lost comms they would follow the last instruction received, ie “cleared to land” not “cleared to land but if you don’t receive any further communication then look at the tower, in a sea of lights, and look for a flashing red light, but if you don’t see it go around anyway because I might have given you clearance but I might have been to premature in doing that, do you copy flight........”.
@@Lyzander911 thank u yes they are supposed to
Happened to me once when I was cleared to land. Atc apparently gave me a heading change to accommodate an American MD-80 on approach to a parallel runway. Didn't hear any of their transmissions and continued on with a right base entry. Fortunately my instructor and I saw the MD-80 and queried the controller as the American was close for no traffic advisory. The transmission went through and we learned they had made several attempts to reach us. From that experience I can say that radios have a tendency to fail during important phases of flight and then start working again. I believe the Air Canada pilots in this case. It was just an unfortunate time for it to happen.
Something is very fishy here. Air Canada has made two life-threatening mistakes at the same airport in the last 2 months.
Oh sure blame canada
kingdomRuler more than likely since she did say there was a problem with the radios
That audio is not from the air... It is much clearer in aircraft.
omnimacrox Lol
Thats a really good point! @omnimacrox
28R is the main runway used for ILS approach. Instrument landings are often needed because of the fog there. Runways 28R and 19 are the instrument landing runways at SFO
I don't know how the radios operate on Airbus. However It may be possible for radio failure and the other 2 radios were not tuned to the tower frequency, thus they wouldn't have heard them. The weather may have been low visibility(I don't know what the weather really was) so they may not have seen the light gun. Another point to make and being a pilot myself, I never look at the tower on an airport when I am on final for landing if i'm not expecting light gun signals. Usually too far out of sight while focusing on landing the plane.
Just my thoughts
if you have low visibility you don't go on a visual approach..
It's been a bad week for some pilots. Last week it was the pilots who did an *approved* fly-over for a last flight but then got suspended for doing it. Now these Air Canada pilots will get hauled over the coals and surely suspended.
Truly Zambian im
temporarily suspended during the investigation, because it might not have been pilot error
Truly Zambian b
This lawyer is just trolling for clients.
Truly Zambian So in your world it's OK to do what you want ignoring the controllers instructions.
The cockpit voice recorder will tell the tale, whether or not the radios were working. If they were, both pilots could loose their licenses.
Yeah, gotta keep those licenses tight!
Maybe the Air Traffic Controller's connection was off accidentally?
*Lose
I think the data of CVR cannot be retrieved without removing it from the aircraft and destroying the casing. That's expensive and the airline wouldn't want to put in a new CVR everytime there's an investigation into crew behavior.
They probably had that turned off too. .. Could of hit um with a flashing red LASER -- that would have got their attention.
Many years ago when I was a student pilot on a solo flight from Lynchburg, Va. in to Raleigh Durham, North Carolina I had a similar incident. I couldn’t hear any radio communication from the tower. I saw the green light and landed safely. I soon after landing I discovered I had some time during the flight turned down the volume of the radio.
Canadians are so polite :)
ATC: Air Canada 781, you are NOT cleared to land.
AC781: no that's okay we insist
Murdock: We have clearance, Clarence.
Oveur: Roger, Roger. What's our vector, Victor?
Perhaps they were on instruments like guitars and saxophones?
Upon hearing this “expert” again, I’m even more troubled with his analysis. Whether there are 2 or 3 radios onboard (I’m sure there are 2 that are being monitored) in normal operations (other than close parallel landing operations that I don’t think SFO does), only one will have the tower frequency tuned unless there is an unusual situation known or suspected.
Also there was no panic in the controller’s voice - perhaps annoyance, yes.
This lawyer and (supposedly former pilot) should stick to chasing ambulances.
I’m sure this is more a pissing contest that actual traffic separation.
Either its racism or the Russians.
rapturekevin, Ah Ah Ah Ah Air Canada pilots are clowns!!
muller said it was the russians
The Russians hacked the flight computer.
Lol, good one.
rapturekevin lol
They've been given clearance to land. What prompted the ATC to cancel the clearance in the first place? No one explains that part.
Tiago Miranda Your radio not working also? At 0:30 the video narrator clearly stated why AC 371 was instructed to go around.
Tiago Miranda Obviously it became apparant that a United plane was still on the runway. He explained that at the beginning.
Lol what? That was like the absolute first thing they explained.
@ 3rdID. He (or she?) is probably from Canada. He wasn't listening either.........
haha nice
Air traffic controller: " air Canada 781, go around."
*Pilot to Co-Pilot:* He wants us to land and then _'go around'_ aircraft waiting to depart !
Co-Pilot: Sounds dangerous! Maybe we should just circle and land after?
*Pilot:* NO! Rule No. 1. Flight controller tells you to do something, you do it immediaahhhhhhhhhhtely! Phew! Just missed
When 781 first responded to the go around their radio sounded like it had a lot of static, so it is plausible that they had RFI or were in a signal depressed area.
Actually, the A320 and 321 both have problems with their radio connections, the ground pin isn't usually secured correctly and it can sometimes short out. Airbus did release a manual patch to airlines servicing the 320 series, but probably because of budget cuts, AC may have decided not to and leave it to chance.
On the previous incident, how the hell can you land on a "taxiway"? Those lights are blue, not white.
Tired, mixes up lighting.....or just simply just to drunk on maple syrup
Air Canada wasn't the only flight on the previous incident, a Delta flight that landed before the Air Canada flight made the exact same mistake.
So 2 well trained pilots just ignored 6 warning of go around. I don't believe they heard "Go around". Also I would like to see that red light flashing and how easy it is to see. Previous incident with aircanada has nothing in common to this one.
Roman O the light gun signals were not warmed up as yet, It was clearly stated. A high beam light doesn't warm immediately, it takes a few minutes to warm.
Given how unexpected it is as well as the height of such a signal, it's shocking to see such a signal coming from the tower controllers. This was after dark, the light has to be bright, in order to signal aircraft in the day. The small airport I trained at and fly out of has used this signaling technique when the single runway was occupied by a student having issues longer than expected.
Bobby how dense were the surrounding lights of the city at your airport? It is very difficult to pick out a light source in the middle of a city. So that light gun better be very bright AND aimed at the intended target which is the incoming plane.
Roman O
Roman do you think the command crew was asleep as they were just meters on top of a well known waterway?
Going to san fran in july 2018 from Toronto Canada cant wait
Light signals can be very hard to see, and especially so if you are not watching for them. I once had trouble picking up the control tower on a particular frequency so the regional air traffic control folks (whose frequency did come in) told me to watch for light signals from the control tower. I still couldn't see them.
(ultimately air traffic control relayed the clearance from the control tower to land)
This is a complete farce! Why is it that people think pilots just do as they are told and it is ATC that are in control of everything? The "expert" in this case is misleading and I think was only selected to hype up the story.
To respond to some of the points:
- "Almost from the first day pilots are trained to do as ATC tells them unless the safety of the aircraft is in danger" If this is what you were trained to do then I am worried, my training revolved around "Aviate, Navigate, Communicate" as a list of priorities, ATC are part of a framework and while permission is needed for many of the things we do (Take-off, Landing etc) they don't get the same pictures as the pilots so the relationship is a two way street.
- "The airbus has 3 radios, and it is unlikely all failed" This is true the aircraft has 3 radios. However not all the radios are tuned to the same frequency (station) at the same time. The primary radio will be on tower, the secondary is usually on the emergency frequency and the third radio could be tuned to company frequency or used for datalink. So it would only take the primary radio to fail to not hear tower. (It is possible that the tower also broadcast on the emergency frequency, however it is common practice for this to be turned down, but not off, during critical phases of flight as it can add unwanted distractions, so may not be immediately audible)
Now, I haven't checked the airport weather but looking at the reported weather for San Francisco it seemed a clear and fine day and evening, so the last a biggest point here that has been missed entirely, THERE ARE WINDOWS ON THE FRONT OF THE AIRCRAFT! If the runway was still occupied then the pilots can go around themselves, they don't need ATC to tell them.
Was it correct to potentially ignore the ATC instruction, no, do I believe that they intentionally ignored the call? no. Do I think that the safety of this flight was at a significantly higher risk because of the missed radio call, no.
There are genuine, worrying situations in aviation at the moment. Issues like fatigue, that have caused serious accidents in the past and yet nothing has been done. Organisational pressures that put genuine strain on air traffic controllers, flight crew and cabin crew, all so the consumer can get cheaper and cheaper air fairs.
The FAA will investigate every reportable incident and that is correct. Is it worth the 10 minute news piece criticising Air Canada pilots, no.
Just my (probably a bit more than...) two cents.
So it’s okay to have 2 planes on a single runway at the same time.
So, ATC had given erroneous instruction to land? Then rescinded that instruction? His first message was mumbled and very hurried and at no point did he say: "Air Canada Flight 781, please acknowledge my go around instruction." Was ATC even transmitting on the correct frequency?
There was no error in giving that landing clearance.
The landing instruction was not erroneous, they had required separation. The instruction was given in the proper phraseology, ther's no need to use 10 words when four will do. Gee, if ATC was transmitting on the wrong frequency, how come everyone else was able to understand and follow instructions.
Air Canada be like
*sOooO SoRRyyYy aBouuUUut tHaaaTt*
I wonder whether pilot or co-pilot switched to the ground control frequency too soon. Red lights are so rare, that part is easier to understand.
"half a dozen times" just say 6 times jeez..
why does it matter
@@EDToasty it's vocabulary diarrhea made to make things sound bigger than they actually are. That's why it matters toaster
Might be confused with s*x ☺
It's two eight right not twenty eight arr 😂
Plus light gun signals are ridiculous. You don't see them unless you are looking at the tower. When you are on final looking at the tower is your last priority. ATC also gave clearance to land but I agree that the pilots should have done a go around if they heard it.
PilotCrissy lol the 28R thing bothered me too 😂😂
Was looking for this. When she said “R” it made me cringe.
And when was the last time you tried to monitor more than one radio while on short final! This clown didn't know what he was talking about. Probably why he is now a "former" pilot; my license is lifetime, how about yours?
David Powell
lol yeah I did see that. I was like "once a pilot always a pilot."
Plus air Canada was on an ifr flight plan so I guess they put him on the wrong approach controller and vectored him in to SFO but the pilot should have seen that on his approach plate though. Both pilot and ATC made a mistake there.
AbysS kB lol I cringe every time
SFO is one of the toughest airport. All pilots are required to have a minimum of 40 hrs of flight time PIC to land at SFO. The flight crew was busy trying to fix the radio problem. During the approach, the pilots fell behind.
Aviate, communicate, navigate in any emergency...doesn’t seem like they had an emergency.
TyrannyTerminator Isn’t it Aviate, Navigate, then Communicate? I truly don’t mean to be annoying, Its just that i’m a student pilot and that’s what we learned in Human Factors. :)
Don't know why this happened but why didn't the air controller change his language to something like "do you copy?" I don't know what protocol is on communication between ground and flights in the air but I would have tried to get clarification on the pilots receipt of the communication transmission.
Its midnight large. Do you really think any sane international pilot would be awake at that hour?
because its an "merrrrican' atc, ignorant to the point of suing his own coffee cup because he spilt it on himself.
Because if they were having intermittent radio problems repeating the message over and over is the best way to be heard
My thought too. At that hour you need something more appropriate like HEY AIR CANADA......GO AROUND!
I hate these "aviation experts" how they sit in the chair and know everyting. What kind of ultralight pilot is this attorney-pilot?How many times did he land an A320 full of pax at night and in short final he aimed his sight to the tower and not to where he has to put that plane down. Those light guns signals are used by nordo aircrafts and in allmost all the cases the pilot and the controller both know they have to use them, so they expect them. Not an A320 pilot. It is evident something went wrong in the cockpit. No pilot in his right mind will not obey to an go arround order from a controller, NO ONE.
wow finally someone with common sense thanks god!
Dumbass, this guy _is_ a formal pilot. Its said around the ~8:50 mark. I hate these wheelchair experts who criticize without even watching the video smh
Nothing said about his qualifications at all. He may be a sport pilot, or he could be a former commercial pilot. And some of the tech has changed significantly.
This points to a pattern, possibly something that's normally not a big deal but bit them this time. Probably ATC has had to issue go arounds many times in the past, as the result of a runway not being clear as anticipated. This time, the inbound flight did not respond to their commands, a situation that could have been fatal. Is it really possible that they would have not heard the multiple transmissions on the radio?
i think that was the problem radio communication lost
Part of the problem is that the AC781 flight was given initial clearance to land when in fact they were not clear to land, the runway was going to be obstructed by another plane. As was pointed out in another video, this "CTL on spec" happens in the USA but does not happen in Europe, which has airports that are just as busy. Clear to Land should only be given once a plane is truly clear to land.
Unfortunately this is very common at SFO they routinely have aircrafts crossing runways after already giving landing clearances. There’s a video where a United flight was ordered to go around twice because of just that
VERY good interview and report. Top notch!
Air canada is taking it hard on San francisco airport. First they try to land on the taxiway then they land the plane despite imstructing not to...
SFO is one of the worse air ports for pilots.
Pilot was high on Maple syrup....... I think..!
They were given clearance. Maybe the tower should be completely sure that the runway is clear before giving clearance to land? Just a thought.
Junior pilots, this is how you have those accidents that end up on TH-cam happen half the time. They stopped listening or tuned down volume last minute before landing.
OR its a terrible airport. As evidenced by the crash that already happened there and repeated close class. Please stick to commenting on what you know about.
3 radios, yes, only one will have the tower frequency dialed in. The secondary radio will have company or ramp/gate frequency for when they land. The 3rd radio is never used unless one of the other 2 is known to be defective well prior to the incident. When you are on final, you are busy performing the checklist which requires a call and response between the pilots.
The light gun signals are rarely used. I never look toward the tower when ready to land. It is usually off to the side by a 1/2 mile at times, opposite of me. I am focused on runway alignment, aircraft performance, and navigation. Such BS that the ambulance chasing lawyer is expecting a zero-defect environment. I get it, the situation could have been terrible, but the Monday morning quarterbacks are laughable.
cellblock131 Captain I agree with u sir as a co pilot of 22 years of age I fly British airways a319 that’s how the radios work for us but the argument between the atc of go around it is really hard to focus on control tower looks tiny from far and I’m busy looking at the runway....not ATC
I disagree with you two...btw i have been a flight simulators pilot for over 20 years🤪
Yes, how would you know the radio is U/S unless you transmitted and didn't get a response. Then you'd have to switch over to another radio.
@@rugratz3440 there is no way those pilots didn’t hear the tower instructions. They heard them loud and clear - they just didn’t want to do a go-around
@@sean2015 they didn't want? How come? Canmot imagine: I am sick of this duty day, better go home, let's ignore the ATC and land no matter what and have my licence suspended, never to be able to fly in my life again. Stress/ tiredness/ workload are to me the leading factors. And maybe the guys inadvertently switched to other frequency
"Air Traffic Controller sounded almost panicked" The controllers voice was very calm he just sounded a bit pissed bcs of ACA not going around. Also how would he know that the pilots just magically switched from ILS to VIS he must've been in the cockpit at the time.
The Southwest pilot probably saved hundreds of lives . He turned off the runway when he saw the other plane coming
In the story and the Air Canada press release it was mentioned that AC781 had received its clearance to land. Once that clearance is received there is no expectation of further communication from ATC so if the radio wasn't working properly that would not elicit any adverse reaction from the flight crew. The lawyer mentioned that there are are a total of thre VHF radios aboard so it is doubtful that all three would not be working. What he didn't say was that it was highly doubtful that all three radios would be tuned to the Tower frequency. They would only be utilizing one radio. If they had suspected that there was a problem with the radio they could then switch to a back up. Since they had already received their landing clearance they would not of known they had a problem until the Tower finally reached them on the ground.
pdquick1 yeah but how are you supposed to know to go around If your radio is malfunctioning?
Sorry, but a go-around is always a possibility after getting a clearance to land and the tower frequency must be continuously monitored. At a busy airport like SFO there is a LOT of radio traffic on the tower frequency and something is wrong if there is an extended period of silence. A thorough investigation should help clear up the confusion.
Is it conceivable that they would tune away from tower? Would they tune the radio to ground before landing? I bet they are supposed to wait they are on a taxiway with no runways to cross, but it was night and these pilots switched over early to save time.
Mod MINI Never, under any circumstances should a pilot switch out of the tower's frequency if in tower's control area, only until tower gives them another frequency to switch to. You can put ground's frequency on standby so when tower tells the pilot to contact ground, the pilot can switch out of tower's frequency to ground in a quick manner. However, the pilot must stay in tower's frequency when in his control area. In this Air Canada flight's case, he was in tower's control area, and even though tower has given him clearance to land, there may be a chance in the landing phase of the flight that a go around is necessary for the safety of the pilot and/or others, either the pilot himself or the air traffic controller can call the go around.
If the radio that was tuned to the tower was not working the crew would not have heard the go around command so how is this BS.
Air Canada was on a different radio frequency.
Or didn’t communicate on the same language.
Darby
Just travel around the world, and you will see how wrong you are.
Multiple Radios, yes, but not necessarily on the correct frequency.
I'd be interested in hearing any aircraft to ATC &/or ground ops communications at SFO immediately after the landing. I also don't recall any reference to the weather - I assume the light gun was realistically visible under the prevailing conditions.
A taxi runway and a TOL runway that is seperate by 100ft apart is waiting for an accident to happen. ..my humble opinion.
The San Francisco airport is very difficult to land on if you are not aware of its differences from all other airports in the world. It is past time to update the S.F. airport to modern safe standards, or so I have heard from one pilot who has landed a commercial planes on this unusual landing situation airport that lacks the more modern aids that line up the incoming airplanes with the runways.
Also, there is no relief taxiway between 28L & 28R so planes can clear the fast turnoffs. That was the reason that caused this incident.
Thank you for your additional explanation. I would hate landing there...either passenger or pilot.
James King what’s wrong w/ a passenger landing or taking off at SFO, I’ve done that several times before and it seems fine.
Well hopefully, the *passenger* isn't the one doing the take-off or landing. Anyway, I've been a passenger in and out of SFO many times and I love that airport, although it was a bit confusing back when AirTran was still around because I would see signs all over that airport showing where to go for Airtran. I eventually realized the signs said AirTRAIN which is the train that carries you from the terminal to car rentals and stuff.
I am just repeating what a commercial pilot told me and that was it is not an easy airport to land on without your crew helping with the correct landing approach. It is not an easy airport to land on. This does not mean that Air Canada had any legitimate reason to not abort their approach.
Maybee they turned the volume down on the radio and forgot to increase it again. It happened to me twice. The red light could be difficult to detect at a large airport with all lights around. At some airports t hey use red firework signal instead. Very easy to observe as they move up in the sky.
Former CPL
The ALDIS lamp (light gun) signals are very hard to see unless you are looking directly at the tower. They're not used to get a pilot's attention, they're used when the pilot knows the radios don't work and is looking for the signals. With two pilots focusing on the runway, it's extremely likely they did not see the ALDIS signals.
But they did hear the tower’s instructions - you can bet on that.
I thought landing clearance were not issued until runway is clear
CptMikeTango Standard procedure to have planes on apporch while others take-off. Now you know.
+Gustav Ziirsen Jochumsen You might be cleared once the preceding trafic is airborne
USA make their own rules up, everywhere else in the world you're only cleared when it is actually 'clear'.
It's a US airport they do things differently there, unsafely by most of the worlds standards but that's how it is.
Steve Leathem please. Every airport in the world does this. You just don't know.
Pilots only listen to one radio at a time during approach and landing. The number of radios on board is irrelevant. If the radio they were using had a hiccup for a minute there would be no way for them to hear the controller.
Glad to read a comment that takes the realities of the situation into consideration!
How about the red light gun??
You would not see it unless you were looking at the control tower. I would figure the pilots of the AC flight didn't realize they were No Radio and were intent on the runway and their airspeed indicator. ( I went no rad in the pattern on downwind at SBA once and had to look several times before getting my green light from the gun - so I did learn exactly how it looks!)
Nobody really looks at the tower for the red light.
exactly! thankyou. Cant believe that that so called expert ex pilot was mouthing off like he did. Im not american or canadian so theres no real bias from me for one vs the other, but as you said shite happens, ive had radio mics stick and block out everything for me, then on their own accord unstick and work fine.
I didn't go any further with this, but did they find any problems with the radios and did the pilots say that they saw the red light gun when asked if they had?
A fair analysis of the situation. Thank God there was no collision.
I am surprised there are not more of these landing issues particularly on the N and S runways! I mean how these pilots line up to land in this direction while adjusting to the earth's spin at 1000 mph takes a lot of skill.
Coriolis isn't that big
"28 AARRRRR" cringed so hard
Its the pirates landing strip. ARRRR
Has there been any update on investigations into this incident?
is it the same air traffic controller or 2 different ones for each instance?
For Canadian you should repeat with extra 1 word in alphabet"A". Go around aaaaa....
Reads title
*ABSOLUTE MAD LAD*
2 radios, not 3 in Air Canada's A320's. But each radio has 2 frequency selectors with a small switch that toggles between the frequency selectors. Pilots will always have one radio tuned to Company Ops frequency with the inactive frequency on that radio selected to the gate control frequency. The other radio will have tower on the active frequency and ground control on the inactive frequency so they can quickly switch to ground control after landing and exiting the runway. Maybe - it's happened to me before - the small toggle switch got accidentally flipped over to ground control without realizing what had happened. It would take the pilots a few moments to realize they were listening to ground control. Also, I can detect a pretty heavy French accent from the PNF (pilot-not-flying). Clearly he's proficient in English, but when English is not your first language...
Sorry!
0:32 when you say twenty-eight R instead of two-eight right
The news know f all about aviation, first “tarmac” and now her saying 28R
Wow....scary
SFO is not the only airport with 2 parallel runways. 3 radios... we used to have 2 on tower and 1 on ground frequency
100k folks in the air around the erf at any given time, pilots and ATC do some pretty good work.
Mr Bleh Ikr, if you did not know, there are 6000-10000 airliners airborne at any given time, insane.
"erf" That was the name of my friends conure b/c it would make that noise.
IS AIR CANADA being blocked or Fined ? Do pilots pay Fine$ and lose employment ?
The quickest way to resolve what happened is to play back the black box to find out if there was any audio commands from air traffic control.
And if so it shows a blatant disregard from the Canadian airplane to follow air traffic controls directions.
Pilot normally has to give a confirmation that atc instructions have been received and understood before being actioned. In UK anyway so that atc know you will follow the instruction
can radio signals be jammed? Regardless ignoring the light signals is clearly cause for investigation.
Of course, but the reason they use AM is that any other carrier on the same frequency will cause an audible heterodyne (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterodyne) that will indicate 2 or more radios were transmitting simultaneously. Anyone listening will hear it, but not the 2 radios transmitting unfortunately.
Yes, and they commonly are jammed. It happens when two people try to transmit at the same time on the same frequency. This is a very common occurrence (many times a day) at most airports. The recordings on this video were from the tower recorder, so it is very possible another aircraft could have been on the frequency "jamming" the transmission to Air Canada.
WRONG! There is absolutely no regulation requiring pilots to listen to two radios simultaneously at any time of day or any phase of flight. Also, the squealing noise you note is only present over the air. These are tower recordings, not open air recordings where a second transmission on frequency could cause the squealing noise.
Yes, I am a pilot. As I understand, PRM approaches are simply high precision ILS approaches. They still are only a tool to allow pilots to get close to the runway on instruments, before transitioning to a visual landing.
Danny C.
Light guns from tower are just dumb. It is not necessary to monitor them as it is very hard to see them and are rarely of use.
ATC: Air Canada go around
Pilot: Ohh but this time i am not on the taxiway?
Tower: Air Canada stop playing Super Mario and respond to our call. Over.... :-))
would what the ATC radio chat be heard on the "black boxes" or just the pilot end of the radio chat ?
101southsideboy
The CVR has several mics in the cockpit; unless the ATC is on a speaker (as opposed to headphones) only their end would be recorded - the investigators can synchronise the recordings to get the full picture. However it is likely the mics will pick up some of ATC.
Part of the problem with the Tenerife Pan-am/KLM crash was static on the radio at the vital monent when the KLM started its takeoff roll - static that masked Pan-am advising it was not clear of the runway and would inform when it was.
Air Canada or any other company won't land if it wasn't given a green light . This recording is after he gave him clearance to land . The timing is the fact here .don't convince me the tower told him to circle and he decided to land . Doesn't make any sense. Something is not right here & it's not from the pilots side
VERY BAD form to give clearance and THEN revoke it - if not because of situations just like this
*VERY BAD form to give clearance and THEN revoke it*
Its perfectly normal to revoke a clearance to land when a dangerous situation arises. Go arounds are extremely common. At busy airports its inevitable that the extremely tight margins they have for packing them in will sometimes be exceeded and someone will have to take another trip around the bay.
Bad form? This is about safety. It's idiocy to ignore ATC. This isn't a school playground but an airport and an extremely busy one at that. Not to mention there was another plane on the runway so any argument that this wasn't about safety is false.
antigen4 It happens commonly at BUSY airports especially during WINTER and/or bad weather. Dangerous situations will arise and the landing clearance will be revoked should those conditions do arise. The FINAL clearance to land is given on their final approach.
There is only one landing clearance. In the United States approach clearance is given by the Approach controller often with vectors to a point where the pilot can see the field and cleared to a visual approach or will be told to join the localiser to an ILS approach or a fix for an RNAV approach. Once cleared onto the given approach the approach controller issues necessary instructions in addition if necessary to ensure separation from other traffic or flow control for the management of traffic departing the airport, such as slowing to give a window for departures, and then hand them off to the tower. The tower on initial contact then will clear the arriving aircraft to land with whatever advisories there would be as to traffic on the ground, departing or on final with them. Being cleared to land number 2 or 3 is very very common. There is only ever one landing clearance.
Exceptions to the above are in IMC conditions below a given minima wherein traffic cannot be cleared to land with traffic holding in position on the runway, to which the tower controller would say "TRAFFIC HOLDING IN POSITION, CONTINUE, EXPECT CLEARANCE X MILE FINAL" or something to that effect. Its entirely common for busy airports to encounter a few occasions where a departing aircraft is too slow, or an arriving aircraft is too fast, or something else happens, that makes the intricate meshing of arrivals and departures conflict and so they go around after being cleared to land.
This lawyer isnt a real pilot and has little clue what hes talking about.The red light being flashed at the pilot is over a mile away from the beginning of the runway. The pilots focus on their instruments and the landing zone when on final and would never be( and shouldnt be) looking away from the runway towards the tower. During daylight that light would be very hard to see even if you were looking directly at the tower. Yes they have 3 radios but its not practical and would be impossible to expect the pilots to have all 3 radios tuned to the tower frequency and being monitored simutaneously. Radios fail all the time controllers radios and the pilots radios.
gitr dun then why not think it's odd not to hear ATC? Air Canada has had 2 problems as of late at that airport. Seems they suck as pilots.
I thought I explained that ...........radio failure, the receiver failed, it happened to me a week ago and every couple of years on average. 2 problems are probably coincedence if it happens again you may be on to somthing.
I should also mention many radio failures are intermittent meaning somtimes they work sometimes they dont.
gitr dun thanks
It's plausible that they may have switched to a different frequency prior to touchdown and thus never received the go around instruction from the tower.
How can it be that in 2017 a transmission between the traffic controller and the pilot is filled with static and barely clear enough to make out the words?
ohhhhhhhh...soooo sad....
who in their right mind would ever fly air canada?
Dumby
Canadians?
"twenty eight arr" I almost vomited.
Did the radio work when tested on the ground AFTER the landing? Did anyone bother to check?
Plane was about to run out of gas. I’m not going around nowhere lol
Im not a pilot but when the video mentioned the light gun to warn the plane drom the tower, i was wondering how come the the tower cant activate res flashing lights on the runway somewhere, that makes sense to me. If airports dont have that yet for landing strips maybe this sort of flashing light system should be installed so its easier for pilots to see.
Red flashing lights on. Runway great safety signal
The lights next to their runway are used to tell the pilot where he is on the glideslope
3:33 when aussie accent mixes with American accent
I glean from reading some answers that the red light is at the towerseems to me the red light should be at the beginning of the runway so the pilots can clearly see them.
I just flew on American Airlines and I was amazed at the age of some of he pilots that I saw in the airport. Some of them didn't look to be older than 24. Shouldn't there be requirements of experience for commercial pilots?
Watch out for all the Conspiracy Theorists! This is ripe with bait for them!
Air Canada is not the same airline as it once was, sad
I agree I think AC needs to return to its roots and earn some money.
This man should do commentary for every plane related incident that hits the pipeway. He seems so knowledgable and informative despite the fact he may be totally wrong. Lol
THIS WAS 2017 AND BECAUSE OF ALL OUR ISSUES WITH FLIGHTS OVER CARONAVIRUS, I THOUGHT THIS WAS NOW.