Lighting Calculations, Inverse Square, Cosine, Efficacy & Lumen Method for Design Explained

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @simaxpix
    @simaxpix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for posting : really useful information and clear explanation: subscribed!

  • @adamsacad8265
    @adamsacad8265 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks. To the point❤😊

    • @sparkyhelp3997
      @sparkyhelp3997  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Many thanks, Please Share with like minded people or maybe even like and subscribe.

  • @arun4846
    @arun4846 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks ❤️

    • @sparkyhelp3997
      @sparkyhelp3997  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No problem. Please Like Share & Subscribe.

  • @salovamrani2084
    @salovamrani2084 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    When i measure light intensity at an angle from a led (60 degrees 50%) it falls faster then cos law predicts (new distance is taken into account) , why is that?

    • @sparkyhelp3997
      @sparkyhelp3997  27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Hi Many thanks for watching, Please share with like minded people. First question, I presume this is in real life where you have taken a light reading. If it is it could be a few possible scenarios:
      1. The light meter is being held at an angle this can vary the result significantly.
      2. The light in question does not give off light evenly in all directions, therefore the calculation will fail, it is likely that there may be a reflector in the lamp or by the very nature of most LEDs construction light is focussed primarily in one direction and does not radiate out in all direction such as most filament lamps (not sold in the UK anymore) or a candle for that matter.
      I hope this goes some way to answering your question, I hope you like and subscribe. Please check out my other videos.

    • @salovamrani2084
      @salovamrani2084 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@sparkyhelp3997 I was measuring by phone. And it doesn't have a cosine correction. I figured it out 😀. when a phone is directly above it follows the inverse square law though. Thanks for replying