I live on a sailboat. I have options. People are so embarrassingly ignorant. Told a few people to be mindful of prevailing winds. If there was anything strategic to their west. Looked at me like I was an alien. Also, don't look at any bright flashes of light 🤔
@mdunit2911 Wrong! Putin is leading the slaughter. He ordered the invasion of Ukraine. The US is more than happy to sell weapons and stay out of direct conflict. It just makes our economy stronger afterall. If NATO is at war with Russia, how many NATO members have been killed? Compare that to Russian losses. Russia has already lost the war, it's a failing state and the rest of the world knows it. Even China is beginning to make claims on western Russian territory and placing troops along the border. Hopefully the innocent Russian civilians won't suffer too much at the hands of there own leader.
Why is it accepted that Russia can use Iranian, North Korean and Chinese missiles in Ukraine, but Ukraine can’t use US, French and UK missiles in Russia? It doesn’t make any sense to me.
Yeah, it doesn’t make sense either I think it’s because those missiles simply equate for USA attacking Russia because it’s made from USA, on which it’s Ukraine the ones firing it. SMH with Russia’s rule to simply trying to cripple Ukraine in these stipulations.
They already have been, theres never been a problem with it. The thing is now, mostly the USA since thats the only opinion that maters in Nato, has basiclly said you can go in deeper now. No front lines battle, no in a bit further to take land, now it go ahead and bomb inside the country as deep as you want. But more importantly, with us allowing this, its basiclly a statement of USA involvement directly, since its their call to do this. Ukraine was already using USA Uk French and i believe German missles already, they have been from the start, including other weaponry. its just that now, the USA is directly getting involved by allowing something, more than just sending ammunitions and weapons
It s very șimple .... North korea Iran or China îs not attacking a NATO country by supporting Russia ... but NATO îs attacking Russia through Ukraine ... Wich means a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO - confrontation starter by NATO and not by Russia (because again Russia never attacked NATO ) ... Wich means WW3 ... You guys need to stop acting like small kids ...
Story floating is that the ICBM/MRBM had a relatively small payload. It appears to be a threat-- not intended to do a lot of damage -- essentially shooting a blank to make the point.
the aim is too escalate western escalation. as icbms usually carry nukes. and the unofficial rule has been not to fire icbms in war in case it leads to accidental nuclear war reaction. now west won't know if russia fires icbms that they are nukes aimed at west, or blanks aimed at Ukraine. until it starts coming down. so russia is playing tit for tat escalating reaction to wests escalation.
Artillery shells cost a few thousand dollars each while ICBMs cost like 200+million each. This was terribly inefficient for the fight in Ukraine and clearly just Putin once again threatening nuclear capabilities.
@@masterragebaiter Doesn't have to be if our delusional leaders would just make peace with Russia. They claim to be able to beat Russia but then act all stupid when Russia is inevitably forced to remind everyone it has one of the largest and most advanced nuclear arsenals in the world.
A well reasoned argument was given here for why Russia could not take the enormous risk of using a nuclear armed ICBM. The retaliation would be immediate and devastating for Russia.
It's a dangerous bluff, as indicated, there is roughly a 6 minute decision window to launch a counter-strike. What I find concerning then, is that even in a scenario where decoy warheads are loaded in a Russian ICBM, the US, France, or any other nation has no way of knowing this, and could launch a counter strike with real warheads upon detection of a Russian launch.
Who is the gentleman being interviewed sitting in the chair with the family pictures in the background? Very informative. The most substance on clarifying the Russia Ukraine war I've heard
There both the same missile. Where it was fired from and to makes the difference in what to call it. ICBM goes from one continent to another. If it don't leave it's continent it can't be called ICBM. Sorry I just had to let you know that friend.
@@MartinCalvey wrong. they are not the same missile. Not even close. Putin would be a fool to use a missile that can travel 3500 miles on a target 300 miles away. Thats bonker. The term ICBM isnt acquired by leaving the continent. Its based on how far it can travel. You can stand in asia and shoot a bazooka into europe. Doesnt make it an intercontinental bazooka. In summary, you couldnt have been more incorrect in your claim that they are the same missile. they arent even close.
@@STaSHZILLA420 The range from Astrakhan to Dnipro is 1200 km. Otherwise, you're right, using an ICBM to do an IRBM's job is just a waste of a very expensive rocket.
@@akizeta it came from the astrakhan region. so the shortest distance could be as low as 450 miles. so i misspoke by 150 miles. Regardless, intelligence agencies around the world say it wasnt an ICBM. the only person saying it is Zelensky. Even in the leaked call, Russia says ballistic missile. the claim that it was a YAR is not accurate as it only had 6 warheads. This was probably some adapted version of a MIRV. You wouldnt launch that upgraded of a missile at partial payload. nor would you launch it at under 1000 miles.
4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1
@akizeta Expensive but sometimes sending an expensive message saves a lot of other costs. That said yeah unlikely here.
@@anderslagerqvist2642not at all NATO cost this war to happen when Ukraine sign a deal Putin pull his troops back guess who made Ukraine president change his mind to rip the deal it was dumb fat stupid British guy then Putin started to mobilize his troops cross the border then NATO started to talk about joining there alliance Putin had enough so he attack Ukraine this war was UK fault thinking cause we’re part of NATO we got nukes they have the right to let Ukraine handle this war they did this cause trump Been saying he will leave NATO and make US independent country so NATO wants the world to burn instead of Trump doing what he been saying to do which i support Trump on leaving NATO for good
It is desperation. I think they targetted the more or less defunct ICBM plant in Ukraine with the special strike. Nobody thought that Ukraine could make an ICBM in their present state. The target is zero value, except for it's psychological one. The line between here and the end of everything is now very fine indeed. I would observe that the overall value of the escalation end game is very low for everyone, and yet Russia seems to like that kind of option.
How is it desperation? The US and UK escalates by allowing ATACMS and HIMARS to be fired into Russian soil. Russia replies with there own escalation using ICBMs.
Russia won't fire Nuke to adjacent country like Ukraine. That's why they have ICBM. The Russian Nukes are meant for the U.S. mainland or Military bases far away. Was there any warning when the U.S. bombed Hiroshima?
Being short on a military he might lose land to China and if really bad Japanese getting a few islands back. I don't think Japan will show force as it's more focused on Taiwan, S. Korea and The Philippines. Russia has a huge problem from all sides with N. Korea, China's proxy to S. Korea and Japan. I lived in China and Taiwan. N Korea will always be a proxy, especially because the food coming from China. N. Korea is experiencing worst drought in a very long time.
Thats not the point. The lunch would have triggerd a retaliation if the west wasent pre warned. If we didnt know they were blanks. And it would have lead to more than a warning shot if there hadent been a warning before the warning shot being fired. Lunching an ICBM toeards Europe even if blank can trigger a response. There's not time to wait for it to land and decide not to counter strike. Thats why we have a counter strike and a second strike is a seprate capabilty. We can detect but we cant effectively shoot down a ICBM strike even tho there are projects that can take down a few at a time with a semi successfull interception. We dont have a nuke shield yet thad is effective against even small strike let alone a mass launch. If the americans and other westeb nations didnt know ahead of time this could have been a nuclear war. You dont and cant lunch a ICMB without retailation unless you pre warn other nuclear powers in advance not to retaliate. This was russia shouting WARNING after whispering it was going to do so.
You a fool if you believe that Russia has very good tech they have the power to end the world higher technology means nothing when you start dropping nukes on each other.
The big question is what Putin will do if realize that have no options to "win" any Ukraine territory, maybe even lost Russian land. Nukes will be a "If I can not have it, then nobody else, nothing more to loose".
The desperate ones are the Ukrainians and the West. Biden was the one who escalated this war into a strategic one by approving missile strikes into Russia because the west is losing the conventional war, not the other way around.
I also thought about this; They are toe-ing over the line, rather than boldly crossing it. If they are gentle about breaking a rule, they are more likely to get away with it without a harsh response.
@rogerc6533 lrhw, and they have others as well as defense against hypersonic missiles. Issue being with all of these missiles regaurdless who, is they look good on paper. Not in a real war situation. Russia is likely out of smaller hypersonic missiles considering they havent been fired in 2 years or so. as they are out of modern tanks all the way down to armor. Their inventory is running out and they are back to motorcyles. Won't be long before the return of the mule, horse and jack asses trying to go against modern weapons. Regaurdless what is believed Russia is in trouble and likely has a very limited number of nuclear weapons. If you consider the US spent 55 billion in upkeep for 5400 and somehow Russia spent 44 billion in their military and still have 6000 claimed working nukes. As well as an active war they can not support.
@@jergar3953 Thats rich considering the west cant even produce enough artillery and munitions to support Ukraine effectively. I'm going to have way more faith in the military industry that is outproducing all the G7 nations combined in materiel whilst also receiving technical aid from China, undoubtedly the most technologically sophisticated nation on earth right now.
Half of their rockets don't even work and that's the new stuff . The older missles still use floppy disc and have been reported in the past to not be maintained. Nuclear warheads need to be maintained i don't russia does that.
Putin himself said it was "a new MRBM" and not a ICBM. It also flew only 1000km from the Caspian Sea area. Mr. Fahrer definitely knows his ICBM terminology.
Didn’t the Russian media do this before? They were doing an interview with a Russian general, starting with some small talk when the general, not realizing that they were already on live television, leans into the interviewer and says something to the effect of, “we both know ???, but I’m going to deny knowing anything about it”. Can someone help me remember what it was he had accidentally blabbed on television?
How much does such a missile cost? How valuable was the target? Why do I suspect net loss on the Russian side? Wasting such weapons on low value targets feels kinda desperate.
Its a political statement to tell the west to stop escalating. It demonstrates that Russia's missiles WORK and that they work WELL because they are HYPER sonic. Nothing the west has is remotely as fast which means they can't STOP these!
@@CZpersi its a political statement that Russias nuclear arsenal not only works but is extremely advanced so the west can stop escalating. The west is probably pissing their pants but will try to escalate closer to nuclear war anyways.
Putin and Oligarchs have family in the west and still have economic interests, not to mention fallout, loss of all allies and retaliation. Unless they are rat shit crazy they wont nuke. Never underestimate US intelligence, if we thout they were going to nuke, our policy has always been first strike to try and save the world, we triple target the nukes and estimate we can destroy over 90 percent before launch. This is still bad as russia can theoretically launch 500 nukes, but i woul guess that half of these are defective. It would be ugly. If we had intelligence on operational status we might cut that down to 250 nukes it would stll be very bad.
Im not disputing, but I have seen this footage as well: multiple times; and concluded there was a group of six, with a cluster count of six, for a total of 36 independent warheads. That was carried in one payload. Otherwise that would have been six missiles with six clusters. They one say one missile, therefore it contianed 36 warheads, count the groups, and then the clusters. 🙏🇺🇦🇺🇲🕊
she fell out of a window right after
It was intentional.
100% on purpose, look at her smile
Russia has the right to defend itself
That was all theater.
@@abelflores1593 So does Ukraine, mr bot
I don't think it was a "mistake" they knew what they were doing
Exactly
You don`t send a billion dollar ICBM dud as a mistake ... It was a message.
Nothing gets more obvious than this.
What’s the message?
@@a64738 They didn't claim it was a mistake. It was a MRBM, not an ICBM. And even an ICBM is not a billion dollars.
Now we're playing chicken with rockets
Yep, and it’s only going to get worse if someone doesn’t back down.
Playing chicken with the human race
We been doing that since the Cold War…..
Most accurate statement in the comment section.
Always have been sinse the V2
The kinetic energy alone from somthing mach 25 is frightening.
If your near it
I live on a sailboat. I have options. People are so embarrassingly ignorant. Told a few people to be mindful of prevailing winds. If there was anything strategic to their west. Looked at me like I was an alien. Also, don't look at any bright flashes of light 🤔
I was just thinking the same... Tungsten is frightening but mach 25? 😮
@@hoosiercrypto9955 mad jelly dude! i have always dreamed of boat life, but i get sea sick really easily. :(
I guess patriots is going to become a lot more prevalent in Ukraine considering it's patriots bread and butter
I’m only halfway into this interview and I have to stop and say this is one of the most insightful conversations I’ve seen yet on the subject.
You are correct Tyrell.
One must love a guy who so obviously knows what he’s talking about. Excellent info I wish were on corporate media. Hale independent media. Great work!
Вы все равно ничего не решаете. Байден ведет вас на убой. У России больше шансов сохраниться.
@mdunit2911 Wrong! Putin is leading the slaughter. He ordered the invasion of Ukraine.
The US is more than happy to sell weapons and stay out of direct conflict. It just makes our economy stronger afterall. If NATO is at war with Russia, how many NATO members have been killed? Compare that to Russian losses. Russia has already lost the war, it's a failing state and the rest of the world knows it. Even China is beginning to make claims on western Russian territory and placing troops along the border.
Hopefully the innocent Russian civilians won't suffer too much at the hands of there own leader.
Why is it accepted that Russia can use Iranian, North Korean and Chinese missiles in Ukraine, but Ukraine can’t use US, French and UK missiles in Russia? It doesn’t make any sense to me.
Yeah, it doesn’t make sense either I think it’s because those missiles simply equate for USA attacking Russia because it’s made from USA, on which it’s Ukraine the ones firing it.
SMH with Russia’s rule to simply trying to cripple Ukraine in these stipulations.
Cause Western missiles work.
They already have been, theres never been a problem with it. The thing is now, mostly the USA since thats the only opinion that maters in Nato, has basiclly said you can go in deeper now. No front lines battle, no in a bit further to take land, now it go ahead and bomb inside the country as deep as you want. But more importantly, with us allowing this, its basiclly a statement of USA involvement directly, since its their call to do this. Ukraine was already using USA Uk French and i believe German missles already, they have been from the start, including other weaponry. its just that now, the USA is directly getting involved by allowing something, more than just sending ammunitions and weapons
It s very șimple .... North korea Iran or China îs not attacking a NATO country by supporting Russia ... but NATO îs attacking Russia through Ukraine ... Wich means a direct confrontation between Russia and NATO - confrontation starter by NATO and not by Russia (because again Russia never attacked NATO ) ... Wich means WW3 ... You guys need to stop acting like small kids ...
Because Russia paid for the Chinese missiles, but America paid for the American missiles. I say this as a proud American
Did no one tell them that Ukraine is in the same continent?
Probably to make sure theirs work at all, in case they need to use nukes
Oh did no one tell Americans that they can't intercept that? Ukraine couldn't
It was a medium range ballistic missile (MRBM), not an ICBM.
That’s not the point. They’re not suggesting it’s for Ukraine it’s a signal to the west that they have working ICBMs
Did no one told Biden and all of americans that we all live on earth
This guy knows warfare and all the weapons! Great to listen to him! Not just another talking head like we usually hear!
Well said. My thoughts exactly.
Right
Ukraine has the right to it's sovereign and to defend their own freedoms🇺🇦
No it’s Russia ancestral homeland like Israel for Jews
Yeah they do but the deal in the beginning was for them not to join nato and they tried to
once upon a time, Ukraine ruled over russia
@ that part I didn’t know I thought Russia was the ruler
@@ronaldwilliams4053Don't join Nato a couple decades ago meant something. Russia now is just creating ennemies by herself. It's such a stupid Idea
Story floating is that the ICBM/MRBM had a relatively small payload.
It appears to be a threat-- not intended to do a lot of damage -- essentially shooting a blank to make the point.
my understanding is that the target was Piwdenmasch / Juschmasch as producer of rockets
the aim is too escalate western escalation. as icbms usually carry nukes. and the unofficial rule has been not to fire icbms in war in case it leads to accidental nuclear war reaction.
now west won't know if russia fires icbms that they are nukes aimed at west, or blanks aimed at Ukraine. until it starts coming down.
so russia is playing tit for tat escalating reaction to wests escalation.
Chuck Farr. Navy seal, and like a breath of fresh air. He knows what he is talking about. Pleasure to listen to.
Crazy how much I learn from yall everyday compared to are own media
putin is the mother who agreed to split the baby in two
@CiggsNDiggs420 i think twins were born or maybe it's more like the movie, the substance where an individual emerges from within 🤔 😆
No Putin isn’t the mother, that’s Stalin. Putin was the baby of the mother who wanted to split the baby in half
Artillery shells cost a few thousand dollars each while ICBMs cost like 200+million each. This was terribly inefficient for the fight in Ukraine and clearly just Putin once again threatening nuclear capabilities.
It’s not a threat. It’s a warning of what is inevitable
@@masterragebaiter lol they scared you already. Their bluff tactic is working
@@Introp ratio ^
@@masterragebaiter Doesn't have to be if our delusional leaders would just make peace with Russia. They claim to be able to beat Russia but then act all stupid when Russia is inevitably forced to remind everyone it has one of the largest and most advanced nuclear arsenals in the world.
The ones that $200 million are the US missiles because of the massive graft, corruption and cost overruns built into the defense industry.
Does this guy do anymore talks? He knows his shit and is a very good talker.
Love from the uk 🇬🇧
😂😂😂 oof. She better avoid windows in her future
Oof you westerners are really going to be dropping out of Windows
@@3rdStoneObliterum We have guns unlike ya'll 🤠
This was Putin saying "Can You Hear Me Now!"
And Ukraine will whisper in his ear "yes."
Anyone with half a brain can hear him well, I'm afraid the think tanks of America and the EU don't even have this much...
And this is nothing jet. You will see...
@@elihadjieva4282 Time to send African migrants to Russia then...
Wow Russia must be running out of conventional weapons
Not at all, they have tripled there output over the capabilities of America.
🤡🤣 bahaha no fhukin way you're this clueless 😂
NATO IS FUCKING AROUND AND FINDING OUT. NATO IS LUCKY PUTIN HAS SELF RESTRAINT.
America's given Ukraine long-range missiles what's the difference
@@trmon8890 I'm from the future and this aged like milk. Nuclear milk.
A well reasoned argument was given here for why Russia could not take the enormous risk of using a nuclear armed ICBM. The retaliation would be immediate and devastating for Russia.
No, for ALL FOR US.
There are problematic people in high places.
Billionaires own this world, and they do NOT care about regular humans.
It's a dangerous bluff, as indicated, there is roughly a 6 minute decision window to launch a counter-strike. What I find concerning then, is that even in a scenario where decoy warheads are loaded in a Russian ICBM, the US, France, or any other nation has no way of knowing this, and could launch a counter strike with real warheads upon detection of a Russian launch.
It doesn't work like that.
The Russians never picked up the red phone at the Kremlin so this was done intentionally to wack everyone. It was a gamble 🎲! Lol.
What’s dangerous is funding a war we have nothing to do with in order to weaken russia that will only push them towards nukes
Well if thats what Putin wants, he might just end up covered in ☢Not the first time part of Russia has been covered in radiation (and still is)
@@knuffelberend How so? What doesn't work like that?
Please stay away from windows and Balconies Miss.
This American understands weapons but not the mentality of other nations, he is not a psychologist, he is an ex squalid, not a strategist.
Who is the gentleman being interviewed sitting in the chair with the family pictures in the background? Very informative. The most substance on clarifying the Russia Ukraine war I've heard
Chuck Farr
I agree! Real information I can feel confident in listening to!
Rolph Harris
Chuck norris
Ok so your all saying different names? Hello?
you are smart and calming, thank you
Russia did not confirm an ICBM launch. They confirmed an IRBM launch
There both the same missile. Where it was fired from and to makes the difference in what to call it. ICBM goes from one continent to another. If it don't leave it's continent it can't be called ICBM. Sorry I just had to let you know that friend.
@@MartinCalvey wrong. they are not the same missile. Not even close. Putin would be a fool to use a missile that can travel 3500 miles on a target 300 miles away. Thats bonker.
The term ICBM isnt acquired by leaving the continent. Its based on how far it can travel.
You can stand in asia and shoot a bazooka into europe. Doesnt make it an intercontinental bazooka.
In summary, you couldnt have been more incorrect in your claim that they are the same missile. they arent even close.
@@STaSHZILLA420 The range from Astrakhan to Dnipro is 1200 km. Otherwise, you're right, using an ICBM to do an IRBM's job is just a waste of a very expensive rocket.
@@akizeta it came from the astrakhan region. so the shortest distance could be as low as 450 miles. so i misspoke by 150 miles. Regardless, intelligence agencies around the world say it wasnt an ICBM. the only person saying it is Zelensky. Even in the leaked call, Russia says ballistic missile.
the claim that it was a YAR is not accurate as it only had 6 warheads. This was probably some adapted version of a MIRV. You wouldnt launch that upgraded of a missile at partial payload. nor would you launch it at under 1000 miles.
@akizeta Expensive but sometimes sending an expensive message saves a lot of other costs. That said yeah unlikely here.
This is playing with ww3, there is nothing in this war worth flirting with this. Insanity!
You also got to understand if Russia would win in Ukrain WW3 is going to happen...
So Ukraine should not flatten the Kremlin?
@@anderslagerqvist2642not at all NATO cost this war to happen when Ukraine sign a deal Putin pull his troops back guess who made Ukraine president change his mind to rip the deal it was dumb fat stupid British guy then Putin started to mobilize his troops cross the border then NATO started to talk about joining there alliance Putin had enough so he attack Ukraine this war was UK fault thinking cause we’re part of NATO we got nukes they have the right to let Ukraine handle this war they did this cause trump Been saying he will leave NATO and make US independent country so NATO wants the world to burn instead of Trump doing what he been saying to do which i support Trump on leaving NATO for good
@@anderslagerqvist2642 this becuase then they will go further a few years later.
Bot post
Thank you, for your service, Mr Chuck Farr. You know your field by plenty of experience.
It is desperation. I think they targetted the more or less defunct ICBM plant in Ukraine with the special strike.
Nobody thought that Ukraine could make an ICBM in their present state. The target is zero value, except for it's psychological one.
The line between here and the end of everything is now very fine indeed.
I would observe that the overall value of the escalation end game is very low for everyone, and yet Russia seems to like that kind of option.
How is it desperation?
The US and UK escalates by allowing ATACMS and HIMARS to be fired into Russian soil.
Russia replies with there own escalation using ICBMs.
Great guest!
Exceptional commentary from someone with compelling competency and understanding of military assets and warfare.
thanks for your info seal.
Why would you nuke land you want to occupy?
Do you truly believe that it is the real purpose ?
Nuclear fallout doesn't stay around that long, only like 2 weeks.
@@lennysmileyface What
@@figura-Baffometi He asked why you would.
@@figura-BaffometiNuclear fallout from weapons is relatively short lived…it’s not the same as a nuclear plant melting down.
Chuk inform us with the facts, thank you!
Best commentary of this conflict I listen to yet.
Very informative, this guy knows his stuff
and still I believe humanity is gonna reach 100 years of nuclear capabilty without armageddon
Good reporting shared.
Russia won't fire Nuke to adjacent country like Ukraine. That's why they have ICBM. The Russian Nukes are meant for the U.S. mainland or Military bases far away. Was there any warning when the U.S. bombed Hiroshima?
Hey Puttsey… play stupid games…
You gonna win stupid prizes!!!🎉
Being short on a military he might lose land to China and if really bad Japanese getting a few islands back. I don't think Japan will show force as it's more focused on Taiwan, S. Korea and The Philippines. Russia has a huge problem from all sides with N. Korea, China's proxy to S. Korea and Japan. I lived in China and Taiwan. N Korea will always be a proxy, especially because the food coming from China. N. Korea is experiencing worst drought in a very long time.
'Puttsy' (as you so eloquently name him) is not playing stupid games, he's playing chess.
😢😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂@@56Gumball
Playing chess? Looks more like checkers cause these guys can’t think outside the box with their “galaxy brain” moves. It’s a complete joke lol
Tell that to Biden who started this strategic missile pissing contest to begin with.
Russia firing blanks... ooh scared.
Все знают что у России ракеты давно закончились, это кондиционеры бракованные Украина закупила в Европе.
Thats not the point. The lunch would have triggerd a retaliation if the west wasent pre warned. If we didnt know they were blanks. And it would have lead to more than a warning shot if there hadent been a warning before the warning shot being fired. Lunching an ICBM toeards Europe even if blank can trigger a response. There's not time to wait for it to land and decide not to counter strike. Thats why we have a counter strike and a second strike is a seprate capabilty. We can detect but we cant effectively shoot down a ICBM strike even tho there are projects that can take down a few at a time with a semi successfull interception. We dont have a nuke shield yet thad is effective against even small strike let alone a mass launch. If the americans and other westeb nations didnt know ahead of time this could have been a nuclear war. You dont and cant lunch a ICMB without retailation unless you pre warn other nuclear powers in advance not to retaliate. This was russia shouting WARNING after whispering it was going to do so.
Especially since Ukraine are picking up Russian mines and dropping them from drones
Thanks on the information about the land mines. The missiles are terrifying yes but the land mines I did not know about.
It was not a icbm , get it right it was a irbm
I wish people and countries of the world would all just get along ..
That is the case for most of us we all want peace. It is the governments that are the issue.
Not Biden. That man is antichrist.
Stop dreaming
Very informative. Thank you
It was not an ICBM it was an IRBM. Big difference
Whatever russia has. America has more and light years ahead technology
everyone has more advanced technology than the big angry gas station
😅😅😅😅😅
You a fool if you believe that Russia has very good tech they have the power to end the world higher technology means nothing when you start dropping nukes on each other.
In Hollywood movies 😂😂 All US hypersonic missiles test failed thus far 😂😂
Way too many information out there to be this uninformed man knowledge is power don’t be so ignorant to what happening.
How embarrassing for the media who peddled the wrong story 😂😂
I guess it is rocket science after all...
The big question is what Putin will do if realize that have no options to "win" any Ukraine territory, maybe even lost Russian land. Nukes will be a "If I can not have it, then nobody else, nothing more to loose".
He can't. He decided to turn this pyhrric victory at best and devastating defeat at worst to a defeat at best to a devastating defeat at its worst.
The desperate ones are the Ukrainians and the West. Biden was the one who escalated this war into a strategic one by approving missile strikes into Russia because the west is losing the conventional war, not the other way around.
Little Vlad the rocketman has no clothes.
She said “Hold on, let me put this call on speakerphone and place you right before the microphone.” 😂 “What are we denying again!?”
Russia a joke
Personally calling it "Putinland" atm.
Hi 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💘💘💘
A dangerous one at that.
Putin and his Kremlin and media clowns are a joke
Keep taking it as a joke and they might joke on you.
I also thought about this; They are toe-ing over the line, rather than boldly crossing it. If they are gentle about breaking a rule, they are more likely to get away with it without a harsh response.
wise words. thank you
Nostrovia
SLAVA UKRAINE 🇺🇦 PHILADELPHIA USA 🇺🇸
Been waiting to hear more about this. Way to be up 2 date.
It was not an ICBM. It was an IRBM. Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile.
What surprised me is when they strike the ground there wasn’t much lighting up of the targets as when the Ukraine s attack hit areas!!
Slim Pickens would not know which warhead to mount.
great interview
"You have won free ticket for helicopter ride. Is leaving now."
How would they know it's nuclear or not though. They didn't react to the decoy model of the SAME weapon.
I don't care,who's right,who's wrong,,this has to stop..we humans are better than this..
No we aren't.
If it's wrong, then why stop? Why not fight for what's right? Why roll over and let a bully beat you?
Thank you, very good analysis !
My question is, did NATO knew what was coming and are they prepared?
NATO does not have hypersonic weapons of their own; so absolutely not.
@rogerc6533 lrhw, and they have others as well as defense against hypersonic missiles. Issue being with all of these missiles regaurdless who, is they look good on paper. Not in a real war situation.
Russia is likely out of smaller hypersonic missiles considering they havent been fired in 2 years or so. as they are out of modern tanks all the way down to armor. Their inventory is running out and they are back to motorcyles. Won't be long before the return of the mule, horse and jack asses trying to go against modern weapons.
Regaurdless what is believed Russia is in trouble and likely has a very limited number of nuclear weapons. If you consider the US spent 55 billion in upkeep for 5400 and somehow Russia spent 44 billion in their military and still have 6000 claimed working nukes. As well as an active war they can not support.
@@rogerc6533 USA is also NATO.
@@gasparole USA does not have any hypersonic weapons in service either
@@jergar3953 Thats rich considering the west cant even produce enough artillery and munitions to support Ukraine effectively. I'm going to have way more faith in the military industry that is outproducing all the G7 nations combined in materiel whilst also receiving technical aid from China, undoubtedly the most technologically sophisticated nation on earth right now.
Стрелы. Перуна. 🇷🇺⚡💪🏼⚡🔥🔥🔥
We wonder if they have functional warheads, not if they have the delivery vehicle.
Если вам интересно, то вы обязательно узнаете.
How many nuclear tests have been done under Putin?
You realize the last time Russia did a successful nuclear test, it was in 1990
@@Steinkonig-yz6xc Yep. Most of their nukes are probably in a non-fuctional state due to lack of upkeep. They cost a fortune to keep in a ready state.
Chuck you and Ben r the best strategic thinkers ANYWHERE!...thx bro
Strange that Putin is threatening to use nukes, but looking around it seems like nobody's scared
Because he has been threatening that everyday for 2 years now maybe ?
Half of their rockets don't even work and that's the new stuff . The older missles still use floppy disc and have been reported in the past to not be maintained. Nuclear warheads need to be maintained i don't russia does that.
There's plenty of people scared. They're just getting silenced
@@HerbertGünther-t2n correction they do this far longer...for decades now when someone said something against theyr wars in syria and so on.
@johnwayne1591 in the era of social media when it's extremely difficult to contain events, this is impressive work on being able to hide the scare
It's not an ICBM. Multiple countries are saying it was an IRBM with a conventional warhead.
Chuck you are so reliable in your information.
So it begins
It`s eyeball to eyeball with Putin now.We can smell his bad breath from here .
Great analysis sir
You think that was an accident she got the call and answered the phone just then? Amateurs
when boss call you have to take that call no mather where you are
Its so obvious its meant to be a show.
Chuck is the man.
Putin himself said it was "a new MRBM" and not a ICBM. It also flew only 1000km from the Caspian Sea area. Mr. Fahrer definitely knows his ICBM terminology.
Guy was in the Navy 40 yrs ago but he still gets it
Question if this is what they say it was why wasn’t this detected. Imagine if this was activated we’d be talking WWIII
This. Who knew and by how long?
You are in the dark .
Thank you for the interview.
Didn’t the Russian media do this before? They were doing an interview with a Russian general, starting with some small talk when the general, not realizing that they were already on live television, leans into the interviewer and says something to the effect of, “we both know ???, but I’m going to deny knowing anything about it”.
Can someone help me remember what it was he had accidentally blabbed on television?
Woo.. 33k kph? Still slower than laser weaponry eh? 😂
That phone conversation is clearly planned for everyone to hear.
I had an escalation after taco Tuesday
😂
You dropped a bomb.
man who is this guy - tysm for breaking this down for us
Russia has the power to end this war. The ball is in their court.
Russia will not allow a USA puppet regime to be in Ukraine. Zero tolerance.
Hitler could have ... he chose not to.
Putin would rather have nuclear war than admit he screwed up. Most political leaders don't like to be called out.
Russia can’t win they have already lost and are attempting to bluff their way through this defeat.
If it was one it wouldn't be an attack against France.
How much does such a missile cost? How valuable was the target? Why do I suspect net loss on the Russian side? Wasting such weapons on low value targets feels kinda desperate.
@@CZpersi Big EGOS and small men
Its a political statement to tell the west to stop escalating. It demonstrates that Russia's missiles WORK and that they work WELL because they are HYPER sonic. Nothing the west has is remotely as fast which means they can't STOP these!
Naw it's show. Depends on what you believe.
Does Russia have nukes?
Can they fire them accurately?
They targeted the Yuzhmanh ICBM plant in Dnipro.
Its a gigantic plant originally meant to make the Topol Mobile TEL launchers.
@@CZpersi its a political statement that Russias nuclear arsenal not only works but is extremely advanced so the west can stop escalating. The west is probably pissing their pants but will try to escalate closer to nuclear war anyways.
This is what we need to take care of. Bidense did thid, and we suffer. He committed Treason, without any warning, he gives Zelensky codes to use ICBMS
Eh why would a seal be sutch an expert on nuke warfare
Briefings
brilliant video
Putin and Oligarchs have family in the west and still have economic interests, not to mention fallout, loss of all allies and retaliation.
Unless they are rat shit crazy they wont nuke.
Never underestimate US intelligence, if we thout they were going to nuke, our policy has always been first strike to try and save the world, we triple target the nukes and estimate we can destroy over 90 percent before launch. This is still bad as russia can theoretically launch 500 nukes, but i woul guess that half of these are defective. It would be ugly.
If we had intelligence on operational status we might cut that down to 250 nukes it would stll be very bad.
Thank you
They found one that worked.
Im not disputing, but I have seen this footage as well: multiple times; and concluded there was a group of six, with a cluster count of six, for a total of 36 independent warheads. That was carried in one payload. Otherwise that would have been six missiles with six clusters. They one say one missile, therefore it contianed 36 warheads, count the groups, and then the clusters. 🙏🇺🇦🇺🇲🕊
NATO has Nukes too.
NATO members have nukes. NATO is an organization of like minded countries, it's not a country.
Wow did you type that yourself..... I guess you learnt that from your government..
@@stepheng7716what are you trying to say
That's kinda a problem for regular people
Invented where? @@stepheng7716
Fascinating content