@@supernova5687 you're wrong. As soon as the impermanence resolved, the carrot was negated. activating carrot after evenly, chaining double cross to put it under mannequin cat will still end on carrot resolving negated
@@massimilianolunardi1836 that does seem weird but his opponent did shuffle his deck. Which should dispel any stacking. The only other form of cheating would be marked cards but there isn’t any evidence of it that we can see.
![1 Orc vs 7 Computers [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7BWNchvzG1Y/mqdefault.jpg)
If you weren’t playing yugioh in the early 2010’s you have no idea how strong FK is it was tier 1 when wolfbark came out
it was the best tier 2 deck or maybe 1.5 cuz mermail and fire fist were the best at the time.
that wasnt fire kings that was fire fist
it wasnt, fire king was rouge. fire fist was the deck that were a meta deck with wolfbark
I myself have been on 2 sky burn 1 circle and def wouldn’t change that ratio
Bro when he used his own arcata against him 😂 why did he put it there
Its crazy how the commentators just keep talking and making it painfully obvious they have no clue what fire kings do.
The deck has been around for 3 days, chill lol
Relax kiddo they are just casters! Their job is to make it sound great and fun and they actually acomplish that.
What was the Imperm misplay?
Carrots chain to negate evenly then double cross to put carots under mannequin and it should be negated
@@supernova5687no, don't work like this
@@supernova5687 you're wrong. As soon as the impermanence resolved, the carrot was negated.
activating carrot after evenly, chaining double cross to put it under mannequin cat will still end on carrot resolving negated
If anything it wasn’t a misplay it was to make sure that he activated it now just so that Giuseppe didn’t activate carrot on his evenly matched
@@Minashya yea yea then i talked to him about this thing and he noticed it but carot will be negated anyways
fire king sanc will 100% will get limited
welp
@@aguauga is it limited?
@@jrumbo_6946 nope
Kevin was clearly stacking the deck in game 3. Judges need to do a better job and punish cheating
please stop making this kind of serious accusation without proof
Are you fucking stupid or something? His opponent shuffled his deck game 3. Can’t stack if your opponent shuffles and cuts.
Yeah I'm kinda confused on when he did that lol he just seemed nervous
@@MisterGiova Then why would he cut his deck twice in the exact position as his opponent?
@@massimilianolunardi1836 that does seem weird but his opponent did shuffle his deck. Which should dispel any stacking. The only other form of cheating would be marked cards but there isn’t any evidence of it that we can see.