I've only had one cheater so far. His best accuracy before this game was 16 percent. He did this bizarre opening really quickly and then played on an even interval. Once he had promoted two queens he resigned. It was weird, but I guess he didn't want to be caught. He may have even seen it as practice of sorts.
The principle of finding and recognizing weak squares and weak pawns is huge. It applied when GM Naroditsky played 1300s and it applies when he plays 2000s. Love this series!
the biggest thing for me is how he playes a rook sacrafice that you wouldnt play unless you already knew how to respond to every move and knew it was forced checkmate then he procedes to think about dayas move for 3 secounds like it suprised him
This video was instructive in that a computer can actually waste 10 moves in the opening, let the GM opponent fully develop and yet beat him eventually. That's just madness for a 1400 player to comprehend.
I think Danya picks the opponents for this so the guy would have to have a legit account for Danya to accept to play him, so it was prolly the first time he used an engine on the account. its crazy the lengths people will go for 5 minutes of attention and then no one gives a fuck about them, idk if they think people will be impressed but it just seems like a waste of your time.
If he opened like that, and continued to play badly, it wouldn't be cheating, then, would it? The opening alone isn't evidence of cheating, it's the fact he played 95% accuracy after the opening.
@@peterdevlin3295 i would not regret, i can create another one xD however i am going to play my moves fast somehow and not take 3 sec on engine move but some more than im gonna lose the game in time trouble playing like 2000 so he wont even report me :p
Wait a minute. I’ve played people who start off playing horrible moves and I’m like “Man my position is just overwhelming better than theirs and they hung a piece. This is will be easy.” And I somehow end up not only losing but getting destroyed. I previously never suspected cheating because they played so poorly to start but when Danya said “I hate when they start like this because that usually means they’re going to suddenly play better.” I realized that that’s probably what was happening to me. I’ll never understand why people play just to cheat. What do they get out of it?
He was never close to beating this chump! Just because the engine says that he was up it doesn't mean anything if the player is blind to all the winning moves. hahaha
No quite opposite of that...it shows that even if you make horrible blunder just to not catch from anti ban system of chess.com and engine is showing -6 advantage than still you will lose if engine itself will play the rest of the game so the engine is never in trouble
@@kidisthing No, it doesn't show that. We are watching one example of a gm that is talking to a chat while calculating. First of all, this sample is far too small to conclude anything. Second of all, full force danya on his own would have won this, I have no doubt in my mind so would have any sufficiently good gm. But... but... in sacrificial positions, you have to play extremely accurately because every move matter (as dany says prepare slow, attack fast). If you are playing against a normal human, an innacuraccy might be ok because defending this is still very very complicated. But against an engine every move needs to be optimal. Daniel still blundered though.
@@speaker1449 Ever heard of cheating at chess because it is fun? Not like your life is boring just because you cheated at an online game for a couple of hours.
@@pokahman236 do you like cheat at chess on a daily basis? Why you getting so offensive over my oppinion? Hb this would you rather watch a player who has been playing for years and talking about how he learned why hes making the moves he is and his personal life or watch a robot play a board game for you?
3:37 not easy to refute his moves. Lol I love this kind of obvious hinting. High level Chess players are like poets when it comes to accusing someone of cheating without saying it out loud. Other classics are like "he is playing way above his rating" and "I cant believe he is X rated"
For the love of me. I have no idea why would someone cheat. That rating number is just a number if it doesn't represent your true skill. And if you cheat, you know that you are not 2400 ELO. So you are just lying to yourself. And that is just sad.
i don't think this person cheated beginning moves wherent computers favourite and he made some blunders that got him -6 that even against best engine daniel should win if he sees right ideas
@@jannickackermans2449 The beginning moves were made with the computer turned off. This seems to be what the cheaters do to try and avoid the automatic detection algorithms so it looks like your accuracy isn't too high.
Maybe because they wanted points and it "makes" them look strong and it pleases them(cheaters). It also satisfies them to destroy players that can't beat by their own strength.
Exploiting things is fun. Getting away with something you're not supposed to be doing is a bit fun. Continuing to cheat after not getting caught seems natural. In a competitive game, there's at least a little bit of fun in beating someone. You also don't really have to pay the cost of risking failure. It's somewhat pornographic: simulating the benefit without putting in the effort for the actual thing.
Some people have the mentality that cheating is part of the game. The object is to win the chess game and if they do it by cheating they've simply outsmarted their opponent by doing so. Other people will justify it to themselves as "not really cheating". They'll justify using Stockfish as it was just showing them the move they were going to do. I mean they're so smart they were obviously going to think about that move. They didn't really need the computer.
This video makes me feel like I encountered a cheater the other day. I'm still a very new chess player, so I assumed my opponent was just toying with me in the beginning, then got serious and beat me, but it was suspiciously like Daniel's game. Either way it doesn't really matter to me much, but it is a bummer to encounter that type of thing.
At very low ratings that kind of thing is super common. Lots of decent chess players make a new account and steamroll low rated players to get to their actual rating. New accounts are a great way to try out crazy openings without sacrificing your rating. Plus some people get off on the kind of flexing that comes from beating up kindergarteners (think Anakin Skywalker)
@@trequor Yea, that's why I wasn't sure if it was a cheater or a good player. Either way it's kind of a dick move to do that to an amateur if you ask me.
The blatant cheating proof is at 22:18, when he plays the incredible f6 in exactly 5 seconds (black cannot take the pawn, because then there's a rook sacrifice into a mating attack which is far from obvious)
I was disappointed to see speed run videos when I'd enjoyed the coaching videos so much. Then I watch a speed run video and realized I enjoyed it more than the coaching videos 😂.
Levy Rozman doesn't know what innocent until proven guilty means. He calls nearly every random player who beats him a cheater, and then gets chess.com to ban them. The last time I saw him cry cheater on stream, he didn't even show the game analysis. I like the way Danya handles it.
It's such a rare virtue to have these days, but we need it more than ever. We should all follow his example when it comes to one's attitude towards a suspicious and accused person.
Daniel, thank you for your integrity and prudence, making this speedrun informative despite dishonesty by your opponent. Ironically, I suspect this speedrun segment will get a ton of views.
Using Daniel principles (play slow moves, develop your pieces, grab space on the flanks etc) I literally toyed around with a 2100 on lichess, (I wasn’t able to convert a the critical moment but that is still a feat !)
You know you play against an engine when you make no bad moves but you find yourself in a position with not too many options and that is exactly what Daniel was having in that game which explains why for the first time you see him without a clear plan. It was educational though watching a GM against a bot .
@@Nnm26 No he is not. That would put him in competition with legit best typers in the world like Sean Wrona. I can believe that he can peak for a few seconds at that speed with easy text, but not hold an average for many many races.
I once offered someone chess lessons for free (I'm about 2100 FIDE). He was a 1100 and was really happy about getting some practice with a strong amateur player. So I asked him to play a couple of games that we could review. When I looked through his games, I realized he was cheating. 2 days later he was banned. I mean why the fuck would you do that if you're looking for coaching?
He closed his own account on December 17 2020, the same day this match happened. He probably realized that something was coming for him, so he closed it. You'd never close an account with absurd wins and a current membership
This guy created another account, kushalbanerjee123. Not sure if he's still cheating but I'm sure given his history he has a tendency to turn it on in critical moments and turn it off again.
no human wouldve played e5 there even if they wanted to bm, human bm is sacking pieces to troll the opponent but a fucking pawn push in the middle of an attack like that is a big tell.
Just imagine that this person actually sat down with multiple devices for 52 GAMES just to cheat. Only a truly pathetic person would do that with his time and I feel sorry for him
@5:43 you had the stunning Rc2!! winning!!!, after Nxc2, then dxc2 and white has to give up the queen to survive!; Bxd4 directly was very strong too. Even Rxd4, in all those lines computer gives +3.5 for black.
especially with the recent boom in chess popularity i've seen a lot of chess related content but i gotta say for me personally this series is the most intriguing educational and fun to watch
Playing a 2379. He must have cheated at least 150 games to get that rating and has bnever been. busted. Of course not. It's all cheaters all the time under 2300. Such an embarrassment..
@@odysseus1220 it was in 2000, and 1994 ibm or some other computer beat Kaspy in a blitz match and in 1997 beat him in classical. So they were strong enough in 2000
Love it -- it seems like there has been a rapid shift in willingness to discuss this among streamers lately (I had long noticed a sort of reluctance to discuss it because Chess(.)com and Lichess very strongly discourage discussion of it). The sport is better in the long-run, even if the userbase of these sites is pruned.
Although it should be noted that the vast majority of engine-users are much subtler -- this is the only kind of cheater whom Lichess/Chess.com say exists.
@@griffinbur1118 how could you know such a thing? Even just using the simple engine that comes pre-packaged with Windows you could beat most players without them even knowing that you were an engine.
It's his upbringing. Daniel may be Russian, but he is a sweet summer child of San Francisco's sunny shores. Stockfish is laid bare to the Siberian winter for weeks on end. It is hardened within the freezing kiln of true suffering.
Daniel, just curious - how do you know that your audience when answering your questions about what to do next -- don't look up chess engines. And you essentially are getting help from engines. Just curious
He doesn't ask the chat for help, he's done maybe 2 chat suggested moves right? Maybe they are engine moves but it's usually him asking chat what the best move is that he already knows x
His chat could be cheating, but I doubt that a cheater would gain much enjoyment from these lessons for long so if it's a problem I bet that it is sporadic. Ratings are refunded anyways so it's so harm to his opponents even if he "cheats" by accident. It's similar to when he coaches Charlie's games; it's normally against the chess.com rules to have help from anyone else, but exceptions are made for instructor-student situations and ratings are refunded.
![ผัวเถื่อน - ยูริ โตเกียวมิวสิค [ OFFICIAL MUSIC VIDEO ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P08ORRVDGl8/mqdefault.jpg)
This cheating is almost as obvious as when my 950 rated opponents manage to beat my 21% accuracy with a nearly flawless 45%
😂😂
I've only had one cheater so far. His best accuracy before this game was 16 percent. He did this bizarre opening really quickly and then played on an even interval. Once he had promoted two queens he resigned. It was weird, but I guess he didn't want to be caught. He may have even seen it as practice of sorts.
@Darwin Neil WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I FUCKING LOVE BOTS
@@RandyLeftHandy his account was prob blocked as you were playing lmao
@@jasoncostan1632 At far as I can tell it's still active. I legit think that he was using an engine as a way to "learn" how to play better.
Gms being surprised at engine moves is exactly me when I see the ideas of a gms moves.
That's me when I accidentally hang half my pieces on an off day
@@benjaminaschlimanjr4939 ah yes, the many faces of a chess player
Same 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lmao
Daniel: "Relax guys". Whilst he shakes, clattering his ☕
Haha
"What he doesn't realise is he's playing me"
bad. ass.
That line by Danya was amazing! Someone should make a movie out of it. Call it: "The Prophet."
12:05
I heard boss music start after he said that hahaha
RIP the account 💀 24:38 ☠️
Shouldn't watch this because I have to study
Danya: What if you do it anyway?
Lol
Ahaha, good one :)
The sam Shankland question
Good one, I actually laughed out loud :)
Your username is so fitting holy
I’m gonna cry when this series ends
hopefully he will start another one. I legit gained 500 points of this series
He needs to beat his speedrun time!
@@Mx6D woah that’s so good!
4000 elo speedrun next
just rewatch
I appreciate Daniel's professionalism when discussing and encountering cheating.
Thought u said encouraging at first 😅
definitely read that as encouraging
opening theory has been revolutionized by the modern need to avoid automated cheat detection.
underrated comment lol
I am addicted to this series. I regularly check throughout the day to see if you’ve uploaded.
It appears that Danya is also a typing GM.
Holy shit ikr that was so fast
Yeah he has something like 190 wpm on typeracer
@@wilio9098 that's nuts. Balls, even. Testicles, if you will.
@@iamdogger5871 lol
@@wilio9098 Jesus I thought I was fast and he beats me by 70wpm
Danya is so calm. Cheating like that is disgraceful.
It's sad more than anything. It's like winning a running contest when you're riding a bicycle.
@@jokuheppu3920 Yeah I never understood the appeal.
People do it because they are stupid and want to seem smarter
The principle of finding and recognizing weak squares and weak pawns is huge. It applied when GM Naroditsky played 1300s and it applies when he plays 2000s. Love this series!
It's something I never even think about while playing, you're right though.
Danya wins: Hurray, we won!
Danya loses or draws: Hurray, that will make the speedrun longer!
He will get his rating back from the cheater tho
@@Plonom Yeah, I know ;)
@@Plonom this ain’t aged well..
@@cationr why?
Dude won this game then resigned his next game in 16 moves after hanging his knight. Then he closed his account.
I don’t think he closed his account, I think chess.com closed his account. That’s their form of banning.
@@callmeqt1269 No. He closed his account. It says he did.
Another video, another good day.
For each and every one of us, a cheater is a source of frustration.
For GM Daniel Naroditsky, a cheater is a source of quality content.
the biggest thing for me is how he playes a rook sacrafice that you wouldnt play unless you already knew how to respond to every move and knew it was forced checkmate then he procedes to think about dayas move for 3 secounds like it suprised him
This video was instructive in that a computer can actually waste 10 moves in the opening, let the GM opponent fully develop and yet beat him eventually. That's just madness for a 1400 player to comprehend.
Weird, his 1st opponent had under a 50% win ratio in bullet and he is rated under 1000. Weird he only played one more game after this and was banned.
he wasnt banned. he closed his account
@@Gytax0 Yeah that's like saying Nixon resigned; it's obvious he's cutting his loses for being guilty
I think Danya picks the opponents for this so the guy would have to have a legit account for Danya to accept to play him, so it was prolly the first time he used an engine on the account. its crazy the lengths people will go for 5 minutes of attention and then no one gives a fuck about them, idk if they think people will be impressed but it just seems like a waste of your time.
@@darrenfleming7901 I'm pretty sure he doesn't pick his opponents. If he did, it wouldn't make sense to play a 2300 as a 2000.
@@kungmee5127 i think he checks their profile to make sure he wont get a cheater who ruins the video
The drama of that thumbnail is perfect haha, like “shattering the screen doesn’t feel like enough let’s add the grim reaper”
As soon as he opened like that with that rating it's a 100% cheating. Played like hes rated 300 then god.
If he opened like that, and continued to play badly, it wouldn't be cheating, then, would it? The opening alone isn't evidence of cheating, it's the fact he played 95% accuracy after the opening.
He's rated 681 in bullet
I'm honestly surprised there's only been two cheaters so far across all of his speedrun games so far.
if i met a SenseiDanya i would open stockfish first time in my life just to troll him
@@Mati-zc2ym wow that would be so hilarious! So would watching your account get banned
@@peterdevlin3295 i would not regret, i can create another one xD however i am going to play my moves fast somehow and not take 3 sec on engine move but some more than im gonna lose the game in time trouble playing like 2000 so he wont even report me :p
The purpose of cheating would just be to stand a chance... Man, he is kinda cheating aswell
@@Mati-zc2ym don't be that guy.
Wait a minute. I’ve played people who start off playing horrible moves and I’m like “Man my position is just overwhelming better than theirs and they hung a piece. This is will be easy.” And I somehow end up not only losing but getting destroyed. I previously never suspected cheating because they played so poorly to start but when Danya said “I hate when they start like this because that usually means they’re going to suddenly play better.” I realized that that’s probably what was happening to me. I’ll never understand why people play just to cheat. What do they get out of it?
The fact that Daniel almost beat STOCKFISH ITSELF just shows how much of a prophet he truly is 😂
Funny clip but he was up -6 even according to stockfish lol
He was never close to beating this chump! Just because the engine says that he was up it doesn't mean anything if the player is blind to all the winning moves. hahaha
No quite opposite of that...it shows that even if you make horrible blunder just to not catch from anti ban system of chess.com and engine is showing -6 advantage than still you will lose if engine itself will play the rest of the game so the engine is never in trouble
@@MrSupernova111 as far as I see that, Danja only missed one move what screwed him over. Which is insane.
@@kidisthing No, it doesn't show that. We are watching one example of a gm that is talking to a chat while calculating. First of all, this sample is far too small to conclude anything. Second of all, full force danya on his own would have won this, I have no doubt in my mind so would have any sufficiently good gm. But... but... in sacrificial positions, you have to play extremely accurately because every move matter (as dany says prepare slow, attack fast). If you are playing against a normal human, an innacuraccy might be ok because defending this is still very very complicated. But against an engine every move needs to be optimal. Daniel still blundered though.
22:07 Chat suggesting engine lines LULW
there is literally no reason to believe that is an engine move
@@Wtahc huh? there are many reasons one of them is there a guessing minigame to get points in chess.com people use engines to get points in GM games
@@wenomechainsanna are u normal
that cheatah kushalbanerjee closed their own account on Dec 17, 2020. lel
You mean this series is not in real time? I mean that game already happened in 2020?
@@sunnyyadav5065 when he loaded the game into stockfish, the date 12-17-2020 was shown. For a 22-1-2021 Posting
Sunny Yadav He’s streaming on twitch first then the editor has to take out the speedrun parts and turn it into a video so it’s a bit behind in speed
@@TW-sh2un Got it.
@@timdavis7398 ok
Imagine cheating at chess lmao, like how boring must your life be
yeah it was fun when i turned on all assists against the ai that kept beating me then i felt empty and stupid. Cant imagine doing it to a person.
You are saying this while watching somebody else play chess for 30 minutes. Must have a pretty exciting life, huh?
@@pokahman236 ever heard of background noise?
@@speaker1449 Ever heard of cheating at chess because it is fun? Not like your life is boring just because you cheated at an online game for a couple of hours.
@@pokahman236 do you like cheat at chess on a daily basis? Why you getting so offensive over my oppinion?
Hb this would you rather watch a player who has been playing for years and talking about how he learned why hes making the moves he is and his personal life or watch a robot play a board game for you?
3:37 not easy to refute his moves. Lol I love this kind of obvious hinting. High level Chess players are like poets when it comes to accusing someone of cheating without saying it out loud. Other classics are like "he is playing way above his rating" and "I cant believe he is X rated"
My day off morning with a Yorkshire cup of tea and watching this speed run is spoiled by the cheater accused.
With you bro
It's frankly quite amusing that after wasting the first 10 moves, computers can beat one of the brightest humans quite easily.
For the love of me. I have no idea why would someone cheat. That rating number is just a number if it doesn't represent your true skill. And if you cheat, you know that you are not 2400 ELO. So you are just lying to yourself. And that is just sad.
People that cheat like winning and don't like chess
And also, you're just sitting there letting a computer play for you. Like tf?
Or to quote a certain famous fictional world champion, "pathetic"
i don't think this person cheated beginning moves wherent computers favourite and he made some blunders that got him -6 that even against best engine daniel should win if he sees right ideas
@@jannickackermans2449 The beginning moves were made with the computer turned off. This seems to be what the cheaters do to try and avoid the automatic detection algorithms so it looks like your accuracy isn't too high.
"It's actually not that easy to refute his moves, I know that sounds crazy" Classic Naroditsky Quote
Said from a winning position...
7:28 "Now lets get our rook to an open file"
*open c-file*: Am I a joke to you
Can someone please explain to me the point of cheating in online chess? LIke, if you want to only win why not just play vs easy bots?
Maybe because they wanted points and it "makes" them look strong and it pleases them(cheaters). It also satisfies them to destroy players that can't beat by their own strength.
Because bots aren't a conscious entity
Exploiting things is fun. Getting away with something you're not supposed to be doing is a bit fun. Continuing to cheat after not getting caught seems natural. In a competitive game, there's at least a little bit of fun in beating someone. You also don't really have to pay the cost of risking failure. It's somewhat pornographic: simulating the benefit without putting in the effort for the actual thing.
@@RG001100 jesus. you made it sound like I might enjoy cheating. thanks for the good answer
Some people have the mentality that cheating is part of the game. The object is to win the chess game and if they do it by cheating they've simply outsmarted their opponent by doing so.
Other people will justify it to themselves as "not really cheating". They'll justify using Stockfish as it was just showing them the move they were going to do. I mean they're so smart they were obviously going to think about that move. They didn't really need the computer.
Just hit 1200 rating thanks for these videos i love your content danya sensei
This video makes me feel like I encountered a cheater the other day. I'm still a very new chess player, so I assumed my opponent was just toying with me in the beginning, then got serious and beat me, but it was suspiciously like Daniel's game. Either way it doesn't really matter to me much, but it is a bummer to encounter that type of thing.
At very low ratings that kind of thing is super common. Lots of decent chess players make a new account and steamroll low rated players to get to their actual rating. New accounts are a great way to try out crazy openings without sacrificing your rating. Plus some people get off on the kind of flexing that comes from beating up kindergarteners (think Anakin Skywalker)
@@trequor Yea, that's why I wasn't sure if it was a cheater or a good player. Either way it's kind of a dick move to do that to an amateur if you ask me.
You know Danya feelings are hurt when he says “thats so funny guys “
The blatant cheating proof is at 22:18, when he plays the incredible f6 in exactly 5 seconds (black cannot take the pawn, because then there's a rook sacrifice into a mating attack which is far from obvious)
SUPER GREAT sportsmanship. I love your attitude, props :)
I was disappointed to see speed run videos when I'd enjoyed the coaching videos so much. Then I watch a speed run video and realized I enjoyed it more than the coaching videos 😂.
Levy Rozman doesn't know what innocent until proven guilty means. He calls nearly every random player who beats him a cheater, and then gets chess.com to ban them. The last time I saw him cry cheater on stream, he didn't even show the game analysis. I like the way Danya handles it.
Just shows a difference in ego. Hikaru is like that too, he has cried cheater many times on innocent players when he has lost. Including other GM's
It's such a rare virtue to have these days, but we need it more than ever. We should all follow his example when it comes to one's attitude towards a suspicious and accused person.
Daniel, thank you for your integrity and prudence, making this speedrun informative despite dishonesty by your opponent. Ironically, I suspect this speedrun segment will get a ton of views.
Using Daniel principles (play slow moves, develop your pieces, grab space on the flanks etc) I literally toyed around with a 2100 on lichess, (I wasn’t able to convert a the critical moment but that is still a feat !)
Well done my man... Next time, convert it..
@@AnandSivaram22 of course:D
I find it funny how the only time Daniel loses is when he goes up against a cheater lmao
If you're implying that some them are legit then you're delusional.
@@Nnm26 when did I ever say that?
@@juicyvortex7204 I thought that you were implying it. Apologies if that isn't the case.
Didn’t he cheat at 22:06?
@@Nnm26 no worries
Guys It’s pooja’s cousin.
(If you’ve seen Eric Hansen vs Cheaters)
is he related to Chris?
You know you play against an engine when you make no bad moves but you find yourself in a position with not too many options and that is exactly what Daniel was having in that game which explains why for the first time you see him without a clear plan. It was educational though watching a GM against a bot .
It makes me sad seeing him lose to cheaters because he's so nice and tries not to be frustrated
Daniel typing so fast, how much wpm?
190
He's close to 200 I think since he played typeracer on stream before.
Dang thats crazy
Over 3000
@@Nnm26 No he is not. That would put him in competition with legit best typers in the world like Sean Wrona. I can believe that he can peak for a few seconds at that speed with easy text, but not hold an average for many many races.
interesting approach... play some shit moves in the beginning to tank ur accuracy rating for the game so it's harder to detect the cheating
It's so odd when you see high level moves that would usually work get shutdown
23:05 good danya quote. writing this down
danya you have a nice soul, i can see it cause i did tons of acid when i was a teenager
Had me in the first half.
Hahaha.
@@liculle just like the acid
jesus loves you
I was there... It was the most disgusting thing in the history. JESUS WEPT
... Cr1tikal was crying???
@@trequor lmao
Actually, I'm not even mad. That's amazing.
Plot twist: It’s an infant alien that just learned how to play chess.
I once offered someone chess lessons for free (I'm about 2100 FIDE). He was a 1100 and was really happy about getting some practice with a strong amateur player. So I asked him to play a couple of games that we could review. When I looked through his games, I realized he was cheating. 2 days later he was banned. I mean why the fuck would you do that if you're looking for coaching?
Why offer lessons for free? If they were paid he probably wouldn't have cheated
My morning routine ! Keep up the content its great
gotham finally covering this lol
He closed his own account on December 17 2020, the same day this match happened. He probably realized that something was coming for him, so he closed it. You'd never close an account with absurd wins and a current membership
Plus he was only 681 in bullet lol
He actually closed his account during the stream
Wait these videos are like a month old wth?
@@lyntonmysun Yes they are. He spaces out the uploads a bit because well... It's still a thirty minute video a day.
This guy created another account, kushalbanerjee123. Not sure if he's still cheating but I'm sure given his history he has a tendency to turn it on in critical moments and turn it off again.
you could probably assume every player from india was cheating and be right more than you were wrong, just like with indian university students
Title should be changed to sandbagger cheater loses to engine cheater
Danya reaction is something amazing
1:02 Holy smokes
He's from India, what a shock!
no human wouldve played e5 there even if they wanted to bm, human bm is sacking pieces to troll the opponent but a fucking pawn push in the middle of an attack like that is a big tell.
This guy was Pooja's brother.
extremely underrated comment
this needs more likes
5:01 he defends the knight! Cheater confirmed
only about 200 people in the world can crush Danya like this and once you realise that, it becomes clear when someone is cheating
So he's moving his knight around to throw off the accuracy. Is that right?
On an unrelated note Danya type so fast like woah
Just imagine that this person actually sat down with multiple devices for 52 GAMES just to cheat. Only a truly pathetic person would do that with his time and I feel sorry for him
Dont need multiple devices, just another window or app
@@rykehuss3435 ok so that takes even more effort, what's your point?
@@DragonSlayer334 Takes less effort actually and is faster
@@rykehuss3435 you sound like you know what you're doing are you the guy from the video 🤣
@@DragonSlayer334 No but I've played a lot against engines
Sensei you are great......happy to be your student
@5:43 you had the stunning Rc2!! winning!!!, after Nxc2, then dxc2 and white has to give up the queen to survive!; Bxd4 directly was very strong too. Even Rxd4, in all those lines computer gives +3.5 for black.
Doesnt he looks like Stefan Salvatore in the thumbnail ?🤔🤔
especially with the recent boom in chess popularity i've seen a lot of chess related content but i gotta say for me personally this series is the most intriguing educational and fun to watch
After the bondclouds opening from Hikaru, the bondknight from Daniel Naroditsky !
Danya's calculation is fast, yeah...
But have you seen his typing?? 🤯
Half those keystrokes are backspaces :D
I wish “I feel like I have so many active pieces that this sacrifice HAS to work” held as true at my level as it does at yours!
I couldn't stop laughing the whole time!! I like how optimistic Danny was the entire game! hahaha
Playing a 2379. He must have cheated at least 150 games to get that rating and has bnever been. busted. Of course not. It's all cheaters all the time under 2300. Such an embarrassment..
If you want to delete an entire word, just hold ctrl (command on Mac) and hit backspace.
This is the same thing that happened with Nigel short , but some deluded people say it was Fischer
The king walk thing?
@@odysseus1220 yes
Nigel lost 8-0 (according to what I heard on agad's channel)
@@Qhsjahajw wasn’t that in the 90’s? Did they have engines?
@@odysseus1220 it was in 2000, and 1994 ibm or some other computer beat Kaspy in a blitz match and in 1997 beat him in classical. So they were strong enough in 2000
Hi Daniel, i from colombia 🇨🇴 you are a good chess player!!!
He's alright
Yeah, he knows a thing or two. I think he has a chance to go professional.
he probably played this game from his fake IRS Call Center...
this is probably a thing to be honest. it seems like the same type of person at the very least.
28:46 donglover xD
Cant believe one of the reasons for why he thought he was cheating was becsuse hes a 2400 who beat danya... Otherwise known as a titled tuesday 😂
I think this guy has now made a new account KushalBanerjee123,
and he must be cheating there too
In a tournament this happened to me and he blundered a piece in the opening on purpose. However I caught him because he found 2 brilliant moves later.
@Qimodis no it was online
Lichess would have busted this guy right after the game and had given a refund
Cheat detection is so strong, you cant even report this fast
True. On Lichess if you play like this youre getting detected by the algorithm instantly and your account gets flagged right after the game
Danya played bad. Obvious weakness on c2 he never exploited.
Love it -- it seems like there has been a rapid shift in willingness to discuss this among streamers lately (I had long noticed a sort of reluctance to discuss it because Chess(.)com and Lichess very strongly discourage discussion of it). The sport is better in the long-run, even if the userbase of these sites is pruned.
Although it should be noted that the vast majority of engine-users are much subtler -- this is the only kind of cheater whom Lichess/Chess.com say exists.
@@griffinbur1118 how could you know such a thing? Even just using the simple engine that comes pre-packaged with Windows you could beat most players without them even knowing that you were an engine.
Are we sure this guy was cheating? There's a simpler explanation: The opponent is Evil Danya from the darkest timeline.
Older readers will recognize him as Danya 2 from The Mirror Universe.
his hair is straight as an arrow and he enjoys playing in the American tradition.
Is the purpose to evade suspicion or is it to troll people? Similar to giving odds and still winning, cheaters are like junkies seeking new highs.
Could you analyse some of your games against alireza Magnus penguins
How did this guy play against an opponent from the year 2070?
Cheater 2: electric boogaloo
The prophet has been unable to beat the fish
It's his upbringing. Daniel may be Russian, but he is a sweet summer child of San Francisco's sunny shores. Stockfish is laid bare to the Siberian winter for weeks on end. It is hardened within the freezing kiln of true suffering.
12:33 is that your computer burning cuz it's running stockfish?
Great video! Haven’t watched it but I just know
Daniel, just curious - how do you know that your audience when answering your questions about what to do next -- don't look up chess engines. And you essentially are getting help from engines. Just curious
He doesn't ask the chat for help, he's done maybe 2 chat suggested moves right? Maybe they are engine moves but it's usually him asking chat what the best move is that he already knows x
His chat could be cheating, but I doubt that a cheater would gain much enjoyment from these lessons for long so if it's a problem I bet that it is sporadic. Ratings are refunded anyways so it's so harm to his opponents even if he "cheats" by accident. It's similar to when he coaches Charlie's games; it's normally against the chess.com rules to have help from anyone else, but exceptions are made for instructor-student situations and ratings are refunded.