How to analyze your PokerTracker 4 statistics to find you poker leaks (PLUS FREE GUIDE)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2024
- Analyze your stats to find statistical deviations (like I did with my 3betting in the SB here), then use these 3 questions to analyze your losses or missed opportunities. Then of course, review some hands!
🚀5 PokerTracker 4 Study Strategies EVERY player NEEDS to Use - www.SmartPokerStudy.com/pt4study
The Get More From PokerTracker 4 Course: 7 hours of video training go.smartpokerstudy.com/Get-mo...
Smart HUD for PokerTracker 4 www.SmartPokerStudy.com/SmartHUD - เกม
Cudos to the author, going to implement these fixes myself. Reason for this comment is your hand history: AA and AK al the way on SB! Now I believe you, youre a tad tight xd
In which video do you have the filter "missed 3 bet opportunities" set up?
I don't know, but it's a simple 2-part filter. (1) Opportunity to 3bet and (2) Did NOT 3bet.
can you explain the correlation between went to showdown, won at showdown, and won when saw flop? mine is 30/53/44 over a 25k hand sample. what is the ideal numbers to sit at ?
These videos from LeakTracker do a great job of explaining these stats and what high/low #'s mean:
www.pokertracker.com/videos/PT4/leaktracker/leaktracker-went-to-showdown-wtsd
www.pokertracker.com/videos/PT4/leaktracker/leaktracker-won-money-at-showdown-wsd
www.pokertracker.com/videos/PT4/leaktracker/leaktracker-won-when-saw-flop-wwsf
Went to showdown is a number that's a bit arbitrary, but once you know what it should be, you can infer a lot of shit, it's math on how often u enter a pot, and then get to showdown, after putting money in the pot. The average median is around 28%, mb 27% depends a bit on the rake structure, but there are things that change this. Very tight ppl, get a lower WTSD, cos they have good hands more often, and they take the pot down before it gets to showdown, more than the average player, another way you can get lower WTSD, is if you're a good redliner player, and you steal more pots than you should, that might seem like you are tight on the river, but it's just that u take down pots more often. The higher this number is, the more stationy he is on the river, most fishes, tend to have higher than 30% WTSD, that means u can valuebet them thinner, if someone has a tight WTSD, u cant valuebet thin, mb better to do bxb lines, and or maybe use smaller sizes.
Won at showdown is just how often you win at showdown, not sure if there's much use to it, except, if someone has a really high won at showdown, they might have the goods more. But the last stat is really good, one of the best stats, it's how often you win the pot when you see the flop, the average small winner or break even regular at any given stake, is around 46-47, it's basically how often you fight for pots, the best players at a given stake tend to have around 50 or low 50's, if it's higher than this, they are really overbluffing like crazy, and u can just herocall them like no other, if it's too low, they arent really fighting for pots where they dont have much, just nit peddlers
Thank you for what you do sky but what do you think about holdem
Manager 3?
Sorry, I don't use it. I started with PT4 and I'm too used to it to want to try another.
@@SmartPokerStudy hey sky I love your videos. And I’m Going to be honest I’m a losing player and I’m so tired of losing how do I get back on the right path please help. Is there anywhere I can email you or do you have a website thank you friend God bless
@@louisvillalba7695 www.SmartPokerStudy.com and www.ThePokerForge.com.
As for where to start, begin working on your preflop game. Raise more than call or limp. Call 3bets rarely, but 3bet a lot. Try to have a plan for stealing post-flop before you enter the pot b/c you're likely going to miss the flop.
What about for online MTT players
I see alot of 6max cash game stuff
Im looking for " optimal " stats to compare in my PT4 reports to help plug leaks .. any suggestions ? Thanks
Great question.
It's tough to give ‘optimal’ tourney stats and win rates. This is because of how dynamics change over the course of any tourney, whereas cash games don't. All of these tourney dynamics affect how you play which in turn affect your statistics: changing stack sizes due to blind increases and antes; the lead up to the bubble, the bubble itself, and the bubble burst; the lead up to the final table and then final table play. Plus, there’s ICM. Also, you may be a different player in higher buy-in tourneys versus lower buy- in tourneys due to the player pool but also due to the money on the line maybe being a concern (scared money play). And, there’s MTT vs SNG.
Here's how I recommend tourney players analyze their statistics and win rates.
1. Analyze higher buy-in tourney stats and win rates separately from lower buy-ins.
2. Separate SNG and MTT play.
3. Analyze your #’s in total without any filters, but also by filtering for starting stack size. Use these ranges: 0-10bb, 10-15bb, 15-20bb, 20-30bb, 30-50bb, 50bb+. I'm sure you play differently with different starting stacks, especially when it comes to calling preflop, 3betting, shoving, facing shoves, cbetting, calling cbets, etc.
4. When analyzing your stats, ask yourself this question, “If I saw this statistic on an opponent, how can I exploit it?” If you can answer that with a super easy exploit, then you just found a leak of yours. For example, maybe you see that at 50bb+ you raise/call 3bets 80% of the time, with a win rate of -425bb/100 hands. You've absolutely found a leak at this stack size, but at a lower stack size, maybe this isn’t an issue for you. Any easy exploits you would use against your own numbers is where you must work first.
4a. You can compare your statistics by starting stack with ‘optimal’ cash game statistics. This could show you possible areas of opportunity. If something is a cash game leak, it’s probably a tourney leak, too.
5. ROI and ITM %’s are very important. You might be winning at the lower buy-ins with a high ROI and a 25% ITM. But at the higher buy-ins, maybe -ROI and 5% ITM. Maybe the player pool is much stronger than you, or you’re playing scared money poker, or you’ve played so few tourneys that your results aren’t reliable yet.
Thanks for the detailed response- it really makes sense , I appreciate everything u said. And definitely will be doing that and start seeing what I can find / figure out as I go
Hi, I am playing on GG and my PT4 display looks different to yours, i.e. columns are in a different order, yours says bb/100 but mine displays bb/hand. How can I customise mine to look more like yours? Thanks
This is the video you need: th-cam.com/video/hB3oLOJqxTM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZB4aK3Obsi5Xux57
@@SmartPokerStudy amazing, thank you
16 vpip is insanely low
You have no sample size LOL
It's still enough to dive in and analyze to find leaks.
@furrburgers. I think it's the method to study and how to do it which is the focus here. This lesson is gold
So you're a nit? Not terrible for the micros I guess. But that's it.
@@sov3273 Still clearly a nit across the board with his stats.
@@sov3273I agree.
A nit is a person with a certain attitude, mostly extreme risk aversion and for lack of a better term being extremely jewish ( yes a faux pas, meant to be illustrative here, and yes stereotyoes can be used to illustrate points).
Yeah agreed. And idk man to each their own but I would have just left it at their extremely averse to risk.@@jeffshackleford3152