Wolfram Physics Project: Why we Chose to do Science in the Open with Q&A on the Backstory

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 30

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    42:33 - Computational Space Flow

  • @simonmasters3295
    @simonmasters3295 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating
    I can hardly believe what I am seeing and hearing
    I will start with the book

  • @stormwalker321
    @stormwalker321 ปีที่แล้ว

    really awesome, thank you Wolfram

  • @Sylosis333
    @Sylosis333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    An open sourced approach to establish new first principle frameworks sounds like something we might look back on in the future with a "why didn't we think of that sooner" sentiment. Hope to see you on more podcasts to get the word out.

    • @Hazelgaia
      @Hazelgaia ปีที่แล้ว

      Trr9l999999999988889889888😊

  • @kenking145
    @kenking145 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i dont know math but as a musician, this is interesting. everything youre saying is how would i articulte chord structure, scales, modes formula
    and genres. also the perception of it and its ambiguity. fascinating

  • @adamgolding
    @adamgolding 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:10:00 but you've built the impossibility of backwards time-travel into the system?

  • @Anders01
    @Anders01 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I propose the name Computics for the new kind of science. And the definition of computics is that it involves models that can be directly computed. Not indirectly calculated such as the three-body problem in physics where only approximations can be done for general solutions.

  • @Sylosis333
    @Sylosis333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should call the theory computational complementarity or comp comp (Comp2) for short. Since GR and QFT are emergant phenomena in the theory as far as I understand it.

  • @xemy1010
    @xemy1010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    BTW, for anyone who's noticed that there's over an hour of video missing here for some reason, the full stream is on Twitch. EDIT - they fixed it :)

    • @ToriKo_
      @ToriKo_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Lumitopia thanks!

    • @Chaosdude341
      @Chaosdude341 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The VOD on Twitch appears to be the same length, so I believe you are mistaken.

    • @xemy1010
      @xemy1010 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Chaosdude341 Looks like they fixed it - for hours after the livestream yesterday, the length here on youtube was under two hours and the first hour was missing.

  • @tarkajedi3331
    @tarkajedi3331 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is how science should be done!!! Open Science means we can watch the ideas take flight and their evolution in real time and maybe even contribute)))

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NKS = “Creative use of Game Mechanics” ^.^

  • @JadenJahci
    @JadenJahci 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “THE NOW”, “Inspiration”, & “Free Range Honesty” look very good on
    you Mr.Wolfram.
    Kind Regards,
    C H A N E ...L

  • @Chaosdude341
    @Chaosdude341 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Stephen, PLEASE upload that John Conway interview! He's one of my favorite mathematicians.

  • @princee9385
    @princee9385 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    4000 years Philosophy Questioning vs 300 years Mathematical Equations vs 30 Years Computational Universality = We are still looking forward to what could be the best approach to understand and figure out the Basic Connecting Unit of Everything.

  • @y86
    @y86 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Here is my name suggestion for the field: Rulics

    • @rv706
      @rv706 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With the danger that all this will became Relics... Who knows, I'm excited to see if this circle of ideas will really become our fundamental theory of physics :)

  • @JadenJahci
    @JadenJahci 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    @2:05:16 to 2:05:21
    Was rather impressive.
    Kind Regards,
    The Millennium Falcon

  • @alexwilson8034
    @alexwilson8034 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My name for the theory is: unicompution
    Also you’ve discovered like Terrance McKenna that language IS reality, which really impresses me. So maybe a name like “biblio-techno” or “compulinguistics”

  • @mistersmithson4321
    @mistersmithson4321 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I am too dumb to understand this, I haven't tried to watch or listen but every time I fall asleep TH-cam plays it to me.

  • @andrewkelley7062
    @andrewkelley7062 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just wondering if anyone has found anything analogous to friction or drag. Sort of in a golf ball in air scenario.

    • @danielb8152
      @danielb8152 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      My guess is that falls under the energy category.

    • @andrewkelley7062
      @andrewkelley7062 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danielb8152 more of how energy on different levels interacts. Like how light waves interact just in the form physical means. Like how a car can ride smooth on a bumpy rode or be forced above it because of the bumps.