Wolfram Physics Project: Why we Chose to do Science in the Open with Q&A on the Backstory

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 เม.ย. 2020
  • Stephen Wolfram & Jonathan Gorard continue answering questions about the new Wolfram Physics Project, this time specifically to answer questions about the backstory and why the project was chosen to be available publicly. Begins at 1:53
    Originally livestreamed at: / stephen_wolfram
    Stay up-to-date on this project by visiting our website: wolfr.am/physics
    Check out the announcement post: wolfr.am/physics-intro
    Find the tools to build a universe: wolfr.am/physics-tools
    Find the technical documents: wolfr.am/physics-documents
    Follow us on our official social media channels:
    Twitter: / wolframresearch
    Facebook: / wolframresearch
    Instagram: / wolframresearch
    LinkedIn: / wolfram-research
    Stephen Wolfram's Twitter: / stephen_wolfram
    Contribute to the official Wolfram Community: community.wolfram.com
    Stay up-to-date on the latest interest at Wolfram Research through our blog: blog.wolfram.com
    Follow Stephen Wolfram's life, interests, and what makes him tick on his blog: writings.stephenwolfram.com
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @kenking145
    @kenking145 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    i dont know math but as a musician, this is interesting. everything youre saying is how would i articulte chord structure, scales, modes formula
    and genres. also the perception of it and its ambiguity. fascinating

  • @Chaosdude341
    @Chaosdude341 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Stephen, PLEASE upload that John Conway interview! He's one of my favorite mathematicians.

  • @Sylosis333
    @Sylosis333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    An open sourced approach to establish new first principle frameworks sounds like something we might look back on in the future with a "why didn't we think of that sooner" sentiment. Hope to see you on more podcasts to get the word out.

    • @Hazelgaia
      @Hazelgaia 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Trr9l999999999988889889888😊

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    42:33 - Computational Space Flow

  • @simonmasters3295
    @simonmasters3295 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating
    I can hardly believe what I am seeing and hearing
    I will start with the book

  • @Sylosis333
    @Sylosis333 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You should call the theory computational complementarity or comp comp (Comp2) for short. Since GR and QFT are emergant phenomena in the theory as far as I understand it.

  • @stormwalker321
    @stormwalker321 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    really awesome, thank you Wolfram

  • @JadenJahci
    @JadenJahci 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “THE NOW”, “Inspiration”, & “Free Range Honesty” look very good on
    you Mr.Wolfram.
    Kind Regards,
    C H A N E ...L

  • @adamgolding
    @adamgolding 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1:10:00 but you've built the impossibility of backwards time-travel into the system?

  • @xemy1010
    @xemy1010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    BTW, for anyone who's noticed that there's over an hour of video missing here for some reason, the full stream is on Twitch. EDIT - they fixed it :)

    • @ToriKo_
      @ToriKo_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Lumitopia thanks!

    • @Chaosdude341
      @Chaosdude341 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The VOD on Twitch appears to be the same length, so I believe you are mistaken.

    • @xemy1010
      @xemy1010 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Chaosdude341 Looks like they fixed it - for hours after the livestream yesterday, the length here on youtube was under two hours and the first hour was missing.

  • @tarkajedi3331
    @tarkajedi3331 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is how science should be done!!! Open Science means we can watch the ideas take flight and their evolution in real time and maybe even contribute)))

  • @y86
    @y86 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Here is my name suggestion for the field: Rulics

    • @rv706
      @rv706 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With the danger that all this will became Relics... Who knows, I'm excited to see if this circle of ideas will really become our fundamental theory of physics :)

  • @princee9385
    @princee9385 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    4000 years Philosophy Questioning vs 300 years Mathematical Equations vs 30 Years Computational Universality = We are still looking forward to what could be the best approach to understand and figure out the Basic Connecting Unit of Everything.

  • @Anders01
    @Anders01 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I propose the name Computics for the new kind of science. And the definition of computics is that it involves models that can be directly computed. Not indirectly calculated such as the three-body problem in physics where only approximations can be done for general solutions.

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NKS = “Creative use of Game Mechanics” ^.^

  • @alexwilson8034
    @alexwilson8034 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My name for the theory is: unicompution
    Also you’ve discovered like Terrance McKenna that language IS reality, which really impresses me. So maybe a name like “biblio-techno” or “compulinguistics”

  • @andrewkelley7062
    @andrewkelley7062 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just wondering if anyone has found anything analogous to friction or drag. Sort of in a golf ball in air scenario.

    • @danielb8152
      @danielb8152 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My guess is that falls under the energy category.

    • @andrewkelley7062
      @andrewkelley7062 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@danielb8152 more of how energy on different levels interacts. Like how light waves interact just in the form physical means. Like how a car can ride smooth on a bumpy rode or be forced above it because of the bumps.

  • @JadenJahci
    @JadenJahci 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    @2:05:16 to 2:05:21
    Was rather impressive.
    Kind Regards,
    The Millennium Falcon