💥Download War Thunder for FREE and get your bonus! ► Use my link - playwt.link/thecosmonaut. To download on IOS & Android use - wtm.game/thecosmonaut #ad
Not really, Battlefield as a whole basically disproves that theory completely, BF4, BF1, BF5 and now 2042 were all lambasted on launch, and all of them turned it around and have become respected in the eyes of the community. When the next BF game releases. you'll see tons of comments talking about the good times on 2042, and everyone will just pretend they loved the game, happens literally every time.
@@Furebel Bf 2042 peaked at nearly 100k players on steam alone, it honestly did just fine, idrk how Battlefield 5 did but after the Pacific update the game did pop off quite hard. You're arguably right it never had the same cultural impact as 4 and 1, but that hardly means the games were broken by bad first impressions, by definition those games werent failures.
@@connorbranscombe6819 I'd say that this peak was on release, and then dropped hard, which only shows how extremely good marketing this game had. Because the marketing was good, it was supposed to bring the second coming of Jesus Christ himself as I remember it! But now I see that there was one free weekend where it actually also peaked at over 100k on steam. No clue what happened there. Still, numbers by themselves don't mean that much. Regularly 2042 gets around 15k-20k peaks. Battlefield 1 has... also around 15k peaks. As I see right now, Battlefield V is actually the winner with 25-30k, peaks, while Battlefield 4 struggles to break 3k players. I do have to add that numbers differences between steam and EA launcher might be much bigger on 4, 1 and V then 2042, as back then these games were accessible only on Origin - the old EA launcher. So the real numbers of players on older titles are most likely much higher then what steamdb shows, while on 2042 it's probably close to accurate.
Nothing changes, the people responsible for 2042 probably won’t get fired, and the next battlefield game will probably follow the exact same lifecycle of launching terribly -> fixed over 1-2 years -> support gets cut as soon as the game is good
It'll never be good. This is different from the rest of franchise There's no destructible environments and the game doesn't like feel like battlefield. The movement feels like something I made in Unity 6 years ago. It was a beginner tutorial as well.
@@MattChew2Let's not forget the fact that it didn't even release with a SCOREBOARD. LITERALLY A THING THAT EVERY SINGLE PVP GAME IN EXISTENCE HAS. I can go on forever about how shitty 2042 is compared to previous battlefields and other games on the market rn.
from that one youtuber who review battlefield one that has a saying about 2042 in small segment "battlefield 2042 will be probably be fun when it gets a full release in the year 2042"
19:15 honestly i DESPISE limited time events. When games do those i just quit or do not start playing in the first place. What is the point of devs doing all that work and then throw it away after a short time ?? Keep it permanent ! I will not fall for some publishers stupid FOMO tactics.
@@spaman7716 It honestly ruined online gaming in general where something cannot just "Come out and exist" anymore. If a game does not get new content at least once or twice a month it keeps getting spammed with "Dead game" comments and people move on to a different dopamine giving shiny new toy.
I did the same when that desert map launched.. Game was running way worse than I remember. Once Battlebit and The Finals came out I have no reason to go back. Even played BF4 a few times this year and it holds up really good! All chat is a riot 😂
@@Spicmouse input is still worse than other shooters, maps would be C or D tier in other battlefields, specialists, bad vehicle balance, it’s generally just flows so randomly and the skill ceiling is nowhere near as high as something like bf3 or 4 this game also has some of the most conceptually broken weapons like the almost hitscan TOR tank and the sniper variant of the railgun unfortunately 2042 is the game delta force took inspiration from but unlike dice the game is actually structurally sound especially after the removal of AI
I've always kinda liked 2042. Like I understand the hate but not the "its not fun" argument. I've been frustrated, yet consistently having fun with it since the beta. Its battlefield at the end of the day, even the worst and weirdest games in the series are fun
Thank god, this isn't a "Battlefield 2042 is good now" video. This game is what it is. The drip feeding and fixing was disgusting. This game personally killed my enjoyment for multiplayer shooters. Cod and battlefield are just not it anymore. Also your editing is very familiar I'm curious who's your inspiration.
The random Henry Blackburn namedrop reminded me that yes, 2042 does exist in the same universe as 3, 4, possibly 1 and V. And yet they STILL won't address the fact that Paris is straight up nuked in the canon. But yeah, 2042 as a game is ok. I don't hate it as much but I just find it serviceable. Ok, but never really giving me those Only In Battlefield(tm) moments the same way older games did, or even stuff like The Finals does.
@@thecosmonaut4221Dima comes back in BF4 and he's like "When you survive a nuke like I have!" and that's the only time Paris is mentioned. Of course, you have Second Assault's version of Métro but you'd think 2042 would address the fact that Paris was nuked, even in passing. Maybe talk about a new Treaty that came in the wake of it or have it be the first domino leading to the future that 2042 takes place. But there's nothing. Not even a calling card blurb
apex has its own problems and althogh im a 9 times master i quit playing just not having fun nomore but to the newer players i say have a blast, wish i could see the game apes through new eyes again
Same here lol. I bought it at a discount, and I'm a BF1, BF3, B4, and BC2 player. I don't get the BF2042 hate. I like the game. I understand it was a disaster at launch, but they fixed quite a lot, rework specialists, and they will fix it with even more updates.
I want the cosmetic changes (different uniforms per faction) and the map changes to Alamein and Bulge, and definitely the class changes that limit weapons to a certain class to be added into Battlefield Portal
I picked it up the other day (for $5), and, the gunplay is neat? I still don’t like specialists looking the same across the only 2 factions. But the balance of gadgets with recon spotting and engineer blowing shit up. Feels, actually Battlefield.
just bought it, thought id give it a try after 3 years of updates for 8 bucks. its kind of amazing how a company can invest so much money into making a game look amazing but playing it feels soulless. battlefield 3, 4 and 1 made you feel like you were in an epic war. this one doesnt.
Doesn't matter how bad you are when you are the only shop in town. DICE is only allowed to fuck up like this, because they have no rival games that are like Battlefield. And even then, with all the improvements the made, 2042 is still the worst Battlefield out there.
battlefield 2042 is what inspired me to make my youtube channel , i legit made weekly videos on the game and wouldnt be here without it , so it will always hold a special place in my heart !
I like BF2042. It's a pretty solid game that, despite being a big downgrade in some areas like the graphics and movement, still manages to be fun and has most of what you'd expect from a Battlefield game. And although I do admire the effort that DICE has put in to improve the game post-launch, I can't really say I recommend buying it at full price, especially with just how little content it has compared to previous titles
I have put 1200 hours in so far. I still play BF4 and BF1 regularly, but I still have a lot of fun in 2042. I still get those “battlefield” moments, it scratches the itch. I find the rail gun tank fund to use, and the gunplay feels crisp, at least way better than the state that call of duty is in right now. The game is also comparatively easier than other battlefield titles, which is why I think people hate on it so much. If you go from playing 2042, then hop in a bf4 server, you’re going to get wrecked, I have probably just been playing 2042 way more than it deserves lol. The wingsuit is obnoxious, so are all of the heroes, looking down the hallway and seeing seven FALCKS reviving each other over and over again really takes you out of the immersion. Edit: I literally forgot about portal and hazard zone, and it’s right there in the menu when you open the game…..
I literally just booted this game up a few hours ago for the first time in over a year and 3(?) Months. I didn't see any ads or anything, haven't kept up with updates. Game feels good now, but for someone who pre-ordered and played early access, there is no way I can just "forget" lol
its still better and more fun then any COD game, and battlefield is unique when it comes to casual all warfare game. Every Battlefiled except Btf 1 had a rough start, Btf 4 was really bad for the first years
Battlefield 2042 turned into a great game. It's really too bad they released it in such poor, unfinished condition. I don't know WTF those managers were thinking.
It didnt always used to be shit on launch, that was around BF3/4 and that was only for some players. Games never been the same for me since 4. Sat out BF1 and V, really wanted to like 2042 but fuck me three times dice, 2042 radicalized me in many ways since. No way ill pay these crooks until they go back to the original formula.
@@Nivelle_le_Gris Kinda, not really, game still got shit on on release, and the game still didnt release any content for like 7-8 months while they fixed the glaring issues with the game. You BF1 fans really like to revise the history of that games launch lol, it was actually so badly received they went back and did a couple more years of free DLC for 4, just because of how badly 1 was hemorrhaging players/
@@connorbranscombe6819 Lol what. I feel like it's people like you trying to alter bf1's history. The trailer was fckin awesome and the game functioned near perfect on launch. I just remembered bf4 sweats whining because they couldn't play with assault rifle #25256327 again. Literally the only problem was the dlcs took a while to come out but at least they were genuinely good.
@@lumbagoboi1649 lol what, cope harder. Then why did they release shiploads more DLC for 4, and have a lower player count then 4 after the launch playerbase died down.
@connorbranscombe6819 What are you talking about? Everyone who was into BF hopped onto BF1, it was a huge thing at the time. A lot of people picked up 4 after because they preferred the modern setting, but they sure as shoot weren't "hemorrhaging players" the game was still well populated well into BFV's life
If the game was going to release it should have released how it is NOW 3 YEARS LATER. Not the mess it was when it was released. They were killed for time to release it way ahead of time.
If Battlefield 6 isn't a BF3 remake, I want the BF franchise to be shuttered and be done with it. There's no excuse for not bringing back the classic feel that kept the franchise alive. Otherwise retire the Battlefield name then because this is NOT Battlefield.
I got it for $4 on steam and I'm actually enjoying it! Perhaps if you didn't witness the first three years it makes a better first impression. Some maps are really meh and there are some frustrating moments, but a great buy for $4 :)
I got the game on sale for $4 a few months ago and its worth the 4 bucks but it lacks core aspects other battlefield games have so id never pay full price for it. Its still fun though.
Stil hate is like 1 European server on ps5, it’s always the same people or matchmaking fails because needs 16 player … and it’s on purpose, restarting the game fixes that
I dont care what reddit says, I like this game Dont get me wrong, the hero shooter stuff is stupid but I like having a battlefield where I can just mess around and fly around in a wingsuit
It was so cheap that I had to try it. It was intensely boring and I couldn’t play it anymore after four hours or so. The one thing I liked was the bot mode
I don't care. It's just shameful they could have decided to support Battlefield V instead of 2042 and chose 2042. That's how I know the next game is going to be bad at best.
I actually really enjoy 2042 even though I only play it from time to time, my main reason is that since I really love the battlefield series, theres a sense of repetitive gameplay for them, the stories and campaigns are amazing, but after the third time, which I reached, it gets really boring now that you experienced everything, and just leaves you drooling for those experiences on multiplayer, but unfortunately since we are no longer in the golden era of those games, they only have the big conquest gamemodes active, theres no servers with naval fight modes, or other maps thats not, for example, that one big field with the one train track from bf4, so, you are just playing the same maps and modes over and over with the same strategies and it gets boring, and it eventually becomes the same with 1 and V. So while there is replayability in each of the battlefield games, it is able to get repetitive somewhat fast, but as for 2042, for some god forsaken reason, the fact that operators are introduced made the gameplay somewhat more unique to each play style and strategy. While I agree that operators dont really fit into battlefield, what does fit in is the abilities that come with said operators, as after the class update, they are now locked to said class, like assault for the weapon abilities, or recon for the exploration based abilities, which should have been how they introduced it. Another thing about 2042 is the AI, yes im not joking, the AI only mode is actually not as bad as you could think. While it can seem boring from a distance, you can actually get some moments that feel out of a campaign, as the AI, specially the enemy team AI is able to not only coordinate, but also roam with vehicles according to the map situation. Lets say the enemy has most zones captured, with only one remaining: your AI will be defending the zone, while they also scatter around to attempt to capture the nearest zones, as the enemy pushes to one place only, and in your perspective, this creates a somewhat feeling of an actual operation or a more inmersive experience as you either hold the zone while enemy tanks, 4x4s and helicopters arrive to take it from you, or help your allies push forwards to a zone to capture and then break the enemy formation, or even do a run with a helicopter or jet to take down enemy vehicles and help both lines of defense and offense for your team. All im saying is that 2042 couldve been an amazing experience but was poorly executed. **But this doesnt mean it inmediately goes to the recycle bin**, you can actually try and find a sense of inmersion, or that feeling that old battlefield games gave if you really attempt to look for it rather than just play. Just give it a small try, even the AI only mode, go one match, try to make a strategy of your own that involves your AI teammates, because DICE actually programed them to be more than just w and left mouse holders all the time, they will respond to the commands you give. ask them for ammo, a support will go running to your location to drop an ammo box, and so will a medic, or even ping a zone, so that the 3 bots assigned to your squad prioritize it and head there as soon as they have the chance to, as either defend it, or attack it. And lets be honest, a break from the tryhard festival that goes on in regular games is really needed, and you can also do progress in AI only as well, progress like weapon attachments, the challenges tied to unlocking vehicles or weapons or even the challenges for the 30 kills or the 2000 kills for the earnable skins, its weird, but its also kind of convenient. And for a bit of context, thats how the game managed to stay active all these 3 years, because the players in it managed to find a reason to continue playing it, and saw its worth behind all the flaws, its definitely not the best, and it could be the worst, but even then, its still not as bad of a game as people make it out to be, and it looks like DICE and EA still cared about it at some point, since most issues were fixed or rearranged to please the playerbase. Its not perfect, but its far from worthless. Its a shame it wasnt able to become what it could have been though.
I play from NE USA. I listened to Jackfrags a few weeks ago and downloaded the game and found it still buggy as hell and full of bot filled servers. Played for about a week and then uninstalled it again. Not worth your time and money.
Yea the game still has many many problems with balancing and very bland map pool. But hey, its still fun for the most part, especially for the 4 dollars i bought it for
Only reason I bought this disaster on sale was because of Portal that had the original formula of classes without the added future Heroes 'sPeciAliSt' crap. Boy was I gullible and stupid, they haven't added one map to Portal since release. Not one. Uninstalled this retardation a year ago.
I told myself the same thing, buts it’s actually really fun if you ignore the monetization. Once you start to get into the tier of planes with missles and stuff it gets grindy and boring, playing the game as a WW2 flight sim is actually a lot of fun, and I don’t ever feel punished for not paying.
To hell with Firestorm, all the BR enthusiasts were all for hyping up that mode only to bail immediately. All that wasted time and resources for a mode that died off within a month. Battlefield & BR/Tarkov *don't* mix. Battlefield's wheelhouse is Conquest, Rush, Operation, TDM and Squad/Small variants of these game modes.
@@Rogue-Mike nah it was good when it came out and just screams lazy devs for not working on it before even giving it a try considering they’ve wasted more time on 2042 then 5 and it’s awful and boring and to talk about operations bf1 was peak operations nothing has come close since then
If you know a little about theology that occult ahit would've made a little more sense. I find myself commenting criticism over and over, I'm autistic, aspergers so don't take it as aggression I just point things out. And valkarie were in BF4. Which makes me wonder if you know Dice pre ps4. Love the explination of the codex and the strange recordings. I found it, (been abroad working for 3 years) so opening it up again was like whoooaaat the hell. I agree. Dice, since 'next gen' has fucked every game launch, remember the witcher, but that's is my top 3 now. 😅 All in all I like this game but I like the arcade while feel of army simulator more than the arcade ness😅 of cods. T skipped bf2. I was a part of the launch for bf1 and my company made big bets tanks for English Game stores. Did u see one lol? Cool vid. I'm subbing but I'm not sure if I'll follow along. Just nice 2 b nice init.
I just herd you quoting Metro correlating it to the on that give exactly the sane feeling. But didn't we love them? If only they didn't put the forest part and had part city like metro it'd be sick. U can probably tell I just git my ps5 back and I'm DICE all the way. Ex employee, EA fucked us bro, time wise.
That tall guy who came in during bf4 and revamp it. That's when Dice got the tag don't buy for a year after release. Also The dlc maps on Hardline! Am I the only one that thinks the6 are some of the best Dice has created? I worked on graveyard.
If one expects a good battlefield, you will be incredibly disappointed. If one expects a fun, very well balanced shooter, you are in for a ride. Dont get me wrong, 2042 is horrible as a battlefield and I play it since the beta - but even Delta Hawk is just not sratching what even that pile of garbage gives me.
@IlConteSky BFV was good at the end of its life and if it had been allowed to continue in that direction it would have beem completely redeemed imo But 2042 is just so painfully unfun and not battlefield at all that you might as well be playing a different game.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 89 | คู่เอก "ยอดไอคิว vs คิริลล์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z3vYkHJ_5Ig/mqdefault.jpg)
💥Download War Thunder for FREE and get your bonus! ► Use my link - playwt.link/thecosmonaut. To download on IOS & Android use - wtm.game/thecosmonaut #ad
I still can't believe EA let the titanfall franchise die.
Been playing a lot of TF2 lately and it's so sweet.
The fact I actually kinda forgot that existed this comment hit somewhere deep
Or Command & Conquer!
@@games_n_that Where is my Red Alert 4 or Generals 2!
@@kidcharlemagne1002TF2 top 3 shooters of all time
I played 2042 and liked it, but this game is the definition of how a first impression can make or break a game.
Not really, Battlefield as a whole basically disproves that theory completely, BF4, BF1, BF5 and now 2042 were all lambasted on launch, and all of them turned it around and have become respected in the eyes of the community.
When the next BF game releases. you'll see tons of comments talking about the good times on 2042, and everyone will just pretend they loved the game, happens literally every time.
@@connorbranscombe6819 Eh, neither Battlefield V nor 2042 ever reached the heights of Battlefield 1 and 4. BF1 was the last proper Battlefield game.
@@Furebel Bf 2042 peaked at nearly 100k players on steam alone, it honestly did just fine, idrk how Battlefield 5 did but after the Pacific update the game did pop off quite hard.
You're arguably right it never had the same cultural impact as 4 and 1, but that hardly means the games were broken by bad first impressions, by definition those games werent failures.
@@connorbranscombe6819 I'd say that this peak was on release, and then dropped hard, which only shows how extremely good marketing this game had. Because the marketing was good, it was supposed to bring the second coming of Jesus Christ himself as I remember it! But now I see that there was one free weekend where it actually also peaked at over 100k on steam. No clue what happened there. Still, numbers by themselves don't mean that much. Regularly 2042 gets around 15k-20k peaks. Battlefield 1 has... also around 15k peaks. As I see right now, Battlefield V is actually the winner with 25-30k, peaks, while Battlefield 4 struggles to break 3k players.
I do have to add that numbers differences between steam and EA launcher might be much bigger on 4, 1 and V then 2042, as back then these games were accessible only on Origin - the old EA launcher. So the real numbers of players on older titles are most likely much higher then what steamdb shows, while on 2042 it's probably close to accurate.
@@connorbranscombe6819 The cyclical nature of a community with chronic memory loss
I guess rent is due
Brother it’s a 2042 video
Don’t make nonsense comments on your “no nonsense LEGO channel “ 😂
Tighten up buster
Call of doobie bro. U go chill on warzone.
imagine putting seasons and a battlepass in a battlefield game
Nothing changes, the people responsible for 2042 probably won’t get fired, and the next battlefield game will probably follow the exact same lifecycle of launching terribly -> fixed over 1-2 years -> support gets cut as soon as the game is good
God I love shareholder and corporate culture in video games
Lmao EA releases pictures from a half complete game and now all of a sudden bf2042 is good? Longest trash in the history of fps.
It'll never be good.
This is different from the rest of franchise
There's no destructible environments and the game doesn't like feel like battlefield.
The movement feels like something I made in Unity 6 years ago. It was a beginner tutorial as well.
@@MattChew2Let's not forget the fact that it didn't even release with a SCOREBOARD. LITERALLY A THING THAT EVERY SINGLE PVP GAME IN EXISTENCE HAS. I can go on forever about how shitty 2042 is compared to previous battlefields and other games on the market rn.
from that one youtuber who review battlefield one that has a saying about 2042 in small segment
"battlefield 2042 will be probably be fun when it gets a full release in the year 2042"
19:15 honestly i DESPISE limited time events. When games do those i just quit or do not start playing in the first place. What is the point of devs doing all that work and then throw it away after a short time ?? Keep it permanent ! I will not fall for some publishers stupid FOMO tactics.
FOMO and using it as a marketing technique needs to be illegal
@@spaman7716 It honestly ruined online gaming in general where something cannot just "Come out and exist" anymore. If a game does not get new content at least once or twice a month it keeps getting spammed with "Dead game" comments and people move on to a different dopamine giving shiny new toy.
tried playing it the other day... It's still awful. After a couple of hours I uninstalled again.
I did the same when that desert map launched.. Game was running way worse than I remember. Once Battlebit and The Finals came out I have no reason to go back. Even played BF4 a few times this year and it holds up really good! All chat is a riot 😂
The game is amazing. What’s awful about it?
@@Spicmouse input is still worse than other shooters, maps would be C or D tier in other battlefields, specialists, bad vehicle balance, it’s generally just flows so randomly and the skill ceiling is nowhere near as high as something like bf3 or 4
this game also has some of the most conceptually broken weapons like the almost hitscan TOR tank and the sniper variant of the railgun
unfortunately 2042 is the game delta force took inspiration from but unlike dice the game is actually structurally sound especially after the removal of AI
idk im having the most fun with it goes down top 3 bf imo i been here since bf1 ... just play the game get better and enjoy it ..oh and get better
@@SwaggFPS Has nothing to do with getting better. Has everything to do with missing content and features.
I still play this activaly becuase playing bf4 for a decade straight can get tiring
it also looks ass on next gen xbox
@@rinphod4442 too bad i dont play xbox lol
try New Delta force then
@PrasathMGM im not wasting 300 gigs sorry
naybe until i upgrade my ssd
Wow I actually made it a minute after posting. For once I’m actually on time lol
i feel you lmao
Naw you're 15mins late 😂.
@@jonpapi_2247 🥲
I've always kinda liked 2042. Like I understand the hate but not the "its not fun" argument. I've been frustrated, yet consistently having fun with it since the beta. Its battlefield at the end of the day, even the worst and weirdest games in the series are fun
Exactly
Bf4 bf1 bfv all had problems
@@thunderkatz4219 yea bro. I'm 25, not a single battlefield has launched in a complete state since I was an actual child. (bf3)
I'll let you in on a secret... Much of the hate is about the "DEI" content. It was pretty rough for the first year after release, ngl, but so was bf4
@jotrutch Difference is 4 was fun and immersive, this game is just a dumb unfun mess that has little to no immersion whatsoever
I never cared for the seasons. I only focused on the normal game modes, conquest and breakthrough. I tried rush but it wasnt the same as in bfbc2
Thank god, this isn't a "Battlefield 2042 is good now" video. This game is what it is. The drip feeding and fixing was disgusting. This game personally killed my enjoyment for multiplayer shooters. Cod and battlefield are just not it anymore.
Also your editing is very familiar I'm curious who's your inspiration.
The random Henry Blackburn namedrop reminded me that yes, 2042 does exist in the same universe as 3, 4, possibly 1 and V. And yet they STILL won't address the fact that Paris is straight up nuked in the canon.
But yeah, 2042 as a game is ok. I don't hate it as much but I just find it serviceable. Ok, but never really giving me those Only In Battlefield(tm) moments the same way older games did, or even stuff like The Finals does.
Holy shit yes!!! Why the fuck has the franchises just ignored that even in bf4
@@thecosmonaut4221Dima comes back in BF4 and he's like "When you survive a nuke like I have!" and that's the only time Paris is mentioned. Of course, you have Second Assault's version of Métro but you'd think 2042 would address the fact that Paris was nuked, even in passing. Maybe talk about a new Treaty that came in the wake of it or have it be the first domino leading to the future that 2042 takes place. But there's nothing. Not even a calling card blurb
The only reference to the nuking of Paris I ever found in 2042, was in Sundance's backstory
I guess that they want to avoid any form of controversy.
@ninochaosdrache3189 ...Russia is a major adversary in 2042. If they wanted to offend no one, they could've just made it all PMCs
DICE could just copy what Apex Legends events are. I remember 3v3 arena release, everyone was playing.
apex has its own problems and althogh im a 9 times master i quit playing just not having fun nomore but to the newer players i say have a blast, wish i could see the game apes through new eyes again
But then EA would have two properties in direct competition to one another, that decreases potential profits, and we can't have that!
bf2042 is greater than ever atm!!! servers always full even in the early hours.. lets go im addicted
Same here lol. I bought it at a discount, and I'm a BF1, BF3, B4, and BC2 player. I don't get the BF2042 hate. I like the game. I understand it was a disaster at launch, but they fixed quite a lot, rework specialists, and they will fix it with even more updates.
1:10 “you are on this council but we do not grant you the rank of master”
I want the cosmetic changes (different uniforms per faction) and the map changes to Alamein and Bulge, and definitely the class changes that limit weapons to a certain class to be added into Battlefield Portal
Gamers have themselves to blame. Fartnite and other trash ruined everything.
Payed $100 for the pre order. Never giving them another penny
Broooooo😂
Listen I never pre order because of battlefield 5 and the 2042 open beta
but hey at least we got Delta Force releasing in a week
Fun video, can't believe you don't have more subs
I picked it up the other day (for $5), and, the gunplay is neat? I still don’t like specialists looking the same across the only 2 factions. But the balance of gadgets with recon spotting and engineer blowing shit up. Feels, actually Battlefield.
I liked this video until I was fooled into a warthunder ad
Sorry I took the ad cause I want to buy my parents a gift for Christmas lol
just bought it, thought id give it a try after 3 years of updates for 8 bucks. its kind of amazing how a company can invest so much money into making a game look amazing but playing it feels soulless. battlefield 3, 4 and 1 made you feel like you were in an epic war. this one doesnt.
Doesn't matter how bad you are when you are the only shop in town. DICE is only allowed to fuck up like this, because they have no rival games that are like Battlefield.
And even then, with all the improvements the made, 2042 is still the worst Battlefield out there.
I didn't even know Battlefront II had seasons
battlefield 2042 is what inspired me to make my youtube channel , i legit made weekly videos on the game and wouldnt be here without it , so it will always hold a special place in my heart !
I like BF2042. It's a pretty solid game that, despite being a big downgrade in some areas like the graphics and movement, still manages to be fun and has most of what you'd expect from a Battlefield game. And although I do admire the effort that DICE has put in to improve the game post-launch, I can't really say I recommend buying it at full price, especially with just how little content it has compared to previous titles
I have put 1200 hours in so far. I still play BF4 and BF1 regularly, but I still have a lot of fun in 2042.
I still get those “battlefield” moments, it scratches the itch. I find the rail gun tank fund to use, and the gunplay feels crisp, at least way better than the state that call of duty is in right now. The game is also comparatively easier than other battlefield titles, which is why I think people hate on it so much. If you go from playing 2042, then hop in a bf4 server, you’re going to get wrecked, I have probably just been playing 2042 way more than it deserves lol. The wingsuit is obnoxious, so are all of the heroes, looking down the hallway and seeing seven FALCKS reviving each other over and over again really takes you out of the immersion.
Edit: I literally forgot about portal and hazard zone, and it’s right there in the menu when you open the game…..
I literally just booted this game up a few hours ago for the first time in over a year and 3(?) Months. I didn't see any ads or anything, haven't kept up with updates. Game feels good now, but for someone who pre-ordered and played early access, there is no way I can just "forget" lol
I played for a day, asked for a refund because it didn't work well for me. Steam actually gave it to me. Thanks steam!
The most creative war thunder ad I've seen. Respect!
its still better and more fun then any COD game, and battlefield is unique when it comes to casual all warfare game. Every Battlefiled except Btf 1 had a rough start, Btf 4 was really bad for the first years
Battlefield 2042 turned into a great game. It's really too bad they released it in such poor, unfinished condition. I don't know WTF those managers were thinking.
Dices engine frostbite is why you don't see Dice there. Because it's there engines that EA bought buddy
It didnt always used to be shit on launch, that was around BF3/4 and that was only for some players. Games never been the same for me since 4. Sat out BF1 and V, really wanted to like 2042 but fuck me three times dice, 2042 radicalized me in many ways since. No way ill pay these crooks until they go back to the original formula.
You missed out on BF1. It was the last BF with a great launch.
@@Nivelle_le_Gris Kinda, not really, game still got shit on on release, and the game still didnt release any content for like 7-8 months while they fixed the glaring issues with the game. You BF1 fans really like to revise the history of that games launch lol, it was actually so badly received they went back and did a couple more years of free DLC for 4, just because of how badly 1 was hemorrhaging players/
@@connorbranscombe6819
Lol what. I feel like it's people like you trying to alter bf1's history. The trailer was fckin awesome and the game functioned near perfect on launch. I just remembered bf4 sweats whining because they couldn't play with assault rifle #25256327 again. Literally the only problem was the dlcs took a while to come out but at least they were genuinely good.
@@lumbagoboi1649 lol what, cope harder.
Then why did they release shiploads more DLC for 4, and have a lower player count then 4 after the launch playerbase died down.
@connorbranscombe6819 What are you talking about? Everyone who was into BF hopped onto BF1, it was a huge thing at the time. A lot of people picked up 4 after because they preferred the modern setting, but they sure as shoot weren't "hemorrhaging players" the game was still well populated well into BFV's life
If 2042 was a book, it'd be written in huge font.. The pages represent the seasons. Numerous, but lacking substance
If the game was going to release it should have released how it is NOW 3 YEARS LATER. Not the mess it was when it was released. They were killed for time to release it way ahead of time.
I liked the shutdown game mode from the leviathan rising event. It should be a permanent mode.
This mode would have been so good if they didn´t reduce player health especially since all weapons in this game are laser beams
Hey, Redacted is in a better state now when compared to before where people were glitching out of bounds 😂
If Battlefield 6 isn't a BF3 remake, I want the BF franchise to be shuttered and be done with it. There's no excuse for not bringing back the classic feel that kept the franchise alive. Otherwise retire the Battlefield name then because this is NOT Battlefield.
I got it for $4 on steam and I'm actually enjoying it! Perhaps if you didn't witness the first three years it makes a better first impression.
Some maps are really meh and there are some frustrating moments, but a great buy for $4 :)
I actually liked ring of fire. Too bad they don’t make it a permanent mode.
I still play battlefield 4 actively on ps5 and pc and this game from time to time.
I got the game on sale for $4 a few months ago and its worth the 4 bucks but it lacks core aspects other battlefield games have so id never pay full price for it. Its still fun though.
EA Dice should just hire you... You'd make the game better! 🤷🏽♂️
Dice is a multi billion dollar company with close to 500 employees
I’m just a dude who thought for 5 minutes
They should keep supporting Battlefront 2
came back to the game cuz of badger... found i actually enjoyed it now.
Your way of storytelling makes skipping the sponsorship almost impossible and that pisses me off.
I’ll take that as a compliment in my writing
Glazing 🌈
@@FurryFramez my self esteem needs it lmao
HEARING THAT NAME IUS SCARY I NEED HELP AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Stil hate is like 1 European server on ps5, it’s always the same people or matchmaking fails because needs 16 player … and it’s on purpose, restarting the game fixes that
Best $15 I ever spent 3 yrs ago
Hello, im from ps5 and there isnt any New season or event here?
Portal is still the best way to play this, the event was decent
Imo they should add canonical Titanfall maps and equipment in Battlefield Portal fuck it
I tried this event. Battle of bulge map. I played for 3 minutes and deleted the game
I dont care what reddit says, I like this game
Dont get me wrong, the hero shooter stuff is stupid but I like having a battlefield where I can just mess around and fly around in a wingsuit
I would play it more. But last time I played it it kept crashing my GPU drivers to the point of corrupting them xD so to scared to try again
It was so cheap that I had to try it. It was intensely boring and I couldn’t play it anymore after four hours or so. The one thing I liked was the bot mode
I don't care. It's just shameful they could have decided to support Battlefield V instead of 2042 and chose 2042. That's how I know the next game is going to be bad at best.
I actually really enjoy 2042 even though I only play it from time to time, my main reason is that since I really love the battlefield series, theres a sense of repetitive gameplay for them, the stories and campaigns are amazing, but after the third time, which I reached, it gets really boring now that you experienced everything, and just leaves you drooling for those experiences on multiplayer, but unfortunately since we are no longer in the golden era of those games, they only have the big conquest gamemodes active, theres no servers with naval fight modes, or other maps thats not, for example, that one big field with the one train track from bf4, so, you are just playing the same maps and modes over and over with the same strategies and it gets boring, and it eventually becomes the same with 1 and V. So while there is replayability in each of the battlefield games, it is able to get repetitive somewhat fast, but as for 2042, for some god forsaken reason, the fact that operators are introduced made the gameplay somewhat more unique to each play style and strategy. While I agree that operators dont really fit into battlefield, what does fit in is the abilities that come with said operators, as after the class update, they are now locked to said class, like assault for the weapon abilities, or recon for the exploration based abilities, which should have been how they introduced it.
Another thing about 2042 is the AI, yes im not joking, the AI only mode is actually not as bad as you could think. While it can seem boring from a distance, you can actually get some moments that feel out of a campaign, as the AI, specially the enemy team AI is able to not only coordinate, but also roam with vehicles according to the map situation. Lets say the enemy has most zones captured, with only one remaining: your AI will be defending the zone, while they also scatter around to attempt to capture the nearest zones, as the enemy pushes to one place only, and in your perspective, this creates a somewhat feeling of an actual operation or a more inmersive experience as you either hold the zone while enemy tanks, 4x4s and helicopters arrive to take it from you, or help your allies push forwards to a zone to capture and then break the enemy formation, or even do a run with a helicopter or jet to take down enemy vehicles and help both lines of defense and offense for your team.
All im saying is that 2042 couldve been an amazing experience but was poorly executed. **But this doesnt mean it inmediately goes to the recycle bin**, you can actually try and find a sense of inmersion, or that feeling that old battlefield games gave if you really attempt to look for it rather than just play. Just give it a small try, even the AI only mode, go one match, try to make a strategy of your own that involves your AI teammates, because DICE actually programed them to be more than just w and left mouse holders all the time, they will respond to the commands you give. ask them for ammo, a support will go running to your location to drop an ammo box, and so will a medic, or even ping a zone, so that the 3 bots assigned to your squad prioritize it and head there as soon as they have the chance to, as either defend it, or attack it.
And lets be honest, a break from the tryhard festival that goes on in regular games is really needed, and you can also do progress in AI only as well, progress like weapon attachments, the challenges tied to unlocking vehicles or weapons or even the challenges for the 30 kills or the 2000 kills for the earnable skins, its weird, but its also kind of convenient.
And for a bit of context, thats how the game managed to stay active all these 3 years, because the players in it managed to find a reason to continue playing it, and saw its worth behind all the flaws, its definitely not the best, and it could be the worst, but even then, its still not as bad of a game as people make it out to be, and it looks like DICE and EA still cared about it at some point, since most issues were fixed or rearranged to please the playerbase. Its not perfect, but its far from worthless. Its a shame it wasnt able to become what it could have been though.
16:15 This was like the only time I was remotely interested in trying out BF2042 again (I didn't) after uninstalling at launch
And it's about to die again thanks to Delta Force
brobably they feel the pressure fomr Delta Force. Im more excited about that then BF... I played when it was beta, and feels way better. :)
I love you Chito GLT enjoyer
I play from NE USA. I listened to Jackfrags a few weeks ago and downloaded the game and found it still buggy as hell and full of bot filled servers. Played for about a week and then uninstalled it again. Not worth your time and money.
It’s better than cod that’s why ppl still play it smfh yall need to relax it’s still fun.
Yea the game still has many many problems with balancing and very bland map pool. But hey, its still fun for the most part, especially for the 4 dollars i bought it for
Only reason I bought this disaster on sale was because of Portal that had the original formula of classes without the added future Heroes 'sPeciAliSt' crap. Boy was I gullible and stupid, they haven't added one map to Portal since release. Not one. Uninstalled this retardation a year ago.
For me 2142 will always be peak Battlefield
1:15 SUPER MEGA BASEBALL 4 MENTIONED!!!!1111!!!11!!!1!1 🔥🔥🗣🗣🗣🗣🗣🔥📢📢📢📢📢💯💯💯💯💯🔥🔥
It’s only still alive because people are desperate for an alternative to cod
BFV died for this, just a reminder
Finally, an OK game
Whiners and negative vibe merchants refuse to die too.
Fallout 76 be like:
I love that game tho. Im playing it everyday.
Hello lego man.
Ping based matchmaking dead from the start
And the next Battlefield will also be a piece of 💩. P.S. They never wanted a scoreboard because keeping score is “mean.”
Nothing will make me play wart hunter, no matter how many sponsors i see
I told myself the same thing, buts it’s actually really fun if you ignore the monetization. Once you start to get into the tier of planes with missles and stuff it gets grindy and boring, playing the game as a WW2 flight sim is actually a lot of fun, and I don’t ever feel punished for not paying.
@@Holdenmagroyn still no
Should’ve made and actual firestorm game mode
To hell with Firestorm, all the BR enthusiasts were all for hyping up that mode only to bail immediately. All that wasted time and resources for a mode that died off within a month.
Battlefield & BR/Tarkov *don't* mix.
Battlefield's wheelhouse is Conquest, Rush, Operation, TDM and Squad/Small variants of these game modes.
@@Rogue-Mike nah it was good when it came out and just screams lazy devs for not working on it before even giving it a try considering they’ve wasted more time on 2042 then 5 and it’s awful and boring and to talk about operations bf1 was peak operations nothing has come close since then
It never left...
Not a single person is surprised that a AAA bf game is still alive 3 years later 🤦♂️ make better click bait
If you know a little about theology that occult ahit would've made a little more sense. I find myself commenting criticism over and over, I'm autistic, aspergers so don't take it as aggression I just point things out. And valkarie were in BF4. Which makes me wonder if you know Dice pre ps4.
Love the explination of the codex and the strange recordings. I found it, (been abroad working for 3 years) so opening it up again was like whoooaaat the hell.
I agree. Dice, since 'next gen' has fucked every game launch, remember the witcher, but that's is my top 3 now. 😅
All in all I like this game but I like the arcade while feel of army simulator more than the arcade ness😅 of cods.
T skipped bf2. I was a part of the launch for bf1 and my company made big bets tanks for English Game stores. Did u see one lol?
Cool vid. I'm subbing but I'm not sure if I'll follow along. Just nice 2 b nice init.
I just herd you quoting Metro correlating it to the on that give exactly the sane feeling. But didn't we love them? If only they didn't put the forest part and had part city like metro it'd be sick.
U can probably tell I just git my ps5 back and I'm DICE all the way. Ex employee, EA fucked us bro, time wise.
That tall guy who came in during bf4 and revamp it. That's when Dice got the tag don't buy for a year after release.
Also
The dlc maps on Hardline! Am I the only one that thinks the6 are some of the best Dice has created? I worked on graveyard.
Excellent video 👏 👏 👏
Tbf 2042 is a cool game
Well I can't play it on Linux, so it's not alive.....
i wanted to buy it for 6 euros discount...but ngl, delta firce is coming out soon, so...
This won't be the case unless they make a new one that's better than whatever this was lol
Fine I'll play again
Lol 2 days ago I download it just to see if I like it and I only lasted half a match, went back to Bf4 lol
Idk. I play it. Its fun to me
i think the next game will do better.
It died on release and is still dead. Almost 3 years later and mouse input is still bad 🤣 incompetent devs
If one expects a good battlefield, you will be incredibly disappointed.
If one expects a fun, very well balanced shooter, you are in for a ride.
Dont get me wrong, 2042 is horrible as a battlefield and I play it since the beta - but even Delta Hawk is just not sratching what even that pile of garbage gives me.
Yeah Battlefield returned, it's now called DeltaForce and launches on December 5th as a Free to Play release, see you there!
Read this comment, never heard of it, googled it, and now hyped, looks super fun!
Just a reskinned 2042
Considering it's already before launch objectively better than both last BF installments, it's a hella good reskin
@IlConteSky BFV was good at the end of its life and if it had been allowed to continue in that direction it would have beem completely redeemed imo
But 2042 is just so painfully unfun and not battlefield at all that you might as well be playing a different game.
>i hate battlefield
>goes to play a battlefield copy of the worst battlefield game to date
lol, lmao even