The Silent Crisis of Software Bloat

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 14

  • @TerryBollinger
    @TerryBollinger 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You are good. I want to see your channel grow! Your analysis and content of these issues are better than the content I've seen on channels with hundreds of thousands of subscribers if not millions. You have the potential to grow, and I hope that you will.

  • @lauraroquevalero8990
    @lauraroquevalero8990 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amazing!!

  • @RolandStenutz
    @RolandStenutz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Having worked with software validation, I couldn't agree more.

  • @videosbruno
    @videosbruno 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Our world is held together by wire and glue... No single person has full knowledge of a computer system, it's just too convoluted and abstracted

    • @cesarsotovalero
      @cesarsotovalero  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is, and most people don’t think about it…

  • @nicholastregenza8426
    @nicholastregenza8426 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks! I'm wondering how much this will affect cars that contain more and more code and are inherently dnagerous machines

    • @cesarsotovalero
      @cesarsotovalero  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good question. I guess with cars will happen as with planes. First there will be a lot of code and crashes, then more code and patches, until we reached a certain level where there will be almost no accidents and we’ll end up with a lot of code that nobody knows how to maintain, but it will be stable enough to keep the systems running for many years.
      Today only a few people in the world fully understand aviation systems written in Fortran or Cobol, but they keep working very well!
      So, for autonomous cars, just make sure to not be part of the training or fine-tuning sets 😊

  • @fr5229
    @fr5229 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m not convinced that the capitalist engine/factory of software will ever have a compelling enough reason to strive for lean software.
    Until now, even after many security disasters, they’re okay with the risks involved in importing “yet another library”; they collectively shoulder the realities of higher maintenance costs and the occasional unmitigated disaster.
    It’s a tragedy of the commons in the sense that these companies have more or less accepted that it’s always but a matter of time until the next disaster. They’re just hoping that the org down the street becomes the collateral damage first while they themselves come out with the good fortune of hindsight, so that they can update their stacks and avoid dealing with legal battles and recovery. Ship software fast, ask questions later!
    The future doesn’t belong to the greedy. It’s never been the case. And the black hats who occasionally throw them into chaos aren’t as bad as they may seem

  • @midorihafu
    @midorihafu 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    As one suggestion to reduce complexity, get rid of the background music; it will make it easier to understand your important points. Thanks.

    • @cesarsotovalero
      @cesarsotovalero  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Note taken, thanks for your feedback!

  • @vitezslav.lindovsky
    @vitezslav.lindovsky 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice music. What were you saying?

  • @leehu1971
    @leehu1971 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Music is too loud and distracting. shame