Don't miss Roger Penrose on the Nobel Prize Conversations podcast to be released on February 4. play.acast.com/s/nobelprizeconversations - 2020's guests have included Nobel Laureates Kip Thorne, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Andrea Ghez, Paul Nurse and Peter Doherty.
To me, Roger Penrose should receive the Nobel just on his charts and scribbles alone lol :-) At 89 years old and giving such a remarkable lecture Penrose is a genius to say the least !!!!
True geniuses can be recognized by the fact that they can explain complicated issues very well. And ROGER PENROSE is excellent at it! ❤️👏👏👏 And, of course, I am fascinated by his presented concept. 🙏
And by his, Anirban Bandyopadhyay, Stuart Hameroff and Jack Tuszyński Great Discoveries about consciousness! And of course the fact that AI cannot even in principle become conscious does not entitle us to treat its (or stupidity of humans who created Chat GTP more precisely) we should by no means treat this threat lightly.
"And this is a Theorem which seems to have won a Nobel Prize" "seems". Sir Roger Penrose is not just a GIANT the Greatest Mind alive. But he was also so incredibly modest while speaking! And bewildered that for all the things that he has done it was just this one "little theorem" in particular that has won a Nobel. No words in no human language can express what Sir Roger Penrose has done. He is the King of Kings!
The sheer speed and accuracy of this almost 90-year-old person's thought is breathtaking. The sound of this voice is perhaps the sound of our greatest living mind.
He is accustomed to having pupils like Stephen Hawkings. So that's his threshold. If God exists, he will ask Roger Penrose what the heck he did. And be none the wiser. "Imagine a flash on a trapped four dimensional surface, yeah". He lost me there somewhere while walking in the woods.
@@bjorntorlarssonGod is logically incoherent... Unlike Godels Incompletness Theorem. LOL. God means Simulator (which in Sir Roger Penrose metaphysics cannot exist) I'm bewildered that religion still does have so much holdout in XXI Century!
Almost equally amazing is that Sir Roger and his father INVENTED the "never-ending staircase" that goes both up and down -- made most famous in the drawings of MC Escher. I had assumed that this "staircase" was an ancient concept or, if not, that Escher had invented it. In fact, after visiting an Escher exhibition in Europe, soon after the end of WW2, the Penroses -- on the train back to England -- decided to come up with something "Escheresque" -- which they did, quite quickly! Penrose Snr published it in a psychology journal, then sent it to Escher who, of course, was impressed and excited by it, so incorporated it in drawings, and adapted it into other forms -- like the "never-ending waterfall." Sir Roger does not get nearly enough credit for his incredibly inventive visual imagination!
Thanks to Penrose for his thoughts, and to the creators of this video for the excellent job they did with presenting his graphics. BTW, it was interesting that all his graphics were hand drawn vice computer generated. I was sorry that he was obviously rushing through his presentation; could not such a worthy talk be allowed a full hour vice thirty minutes?
It is interesting to hear him "collapse" it to half an hour on this four dimensional surface. They challenged him, and he met and won that challenge. I listened to the other Nobel Prize takers too. What did they say? I don't remember. I don't understand this, but I remember it.
When you are squeezed down to infinity, you simply have to speak twice as fast. I have gotten to learn a couple of guys who one doesn't want to play chess with. But this Sir Roger Penrose is steps up on the food chain, so to speak. "- Chess? Squares? How unimaginative!"
I love that, given 30 minutes only for a Nobel talk expected to reach a wide audience, he rushes through the ideas that won him the Nobel Prize, only to spend the remainder explaining and arguing for his much more recent radical cosmological theory.
Well it’s HIS Nobel Prize Lecture, and I think if you win the Nobel Prize you can talk about whatever you want. Besides, if he lives to 100, they’ll have to give him another Nobel Prize in Physics for his cosmology. I mean he has the Nobel committee as a hostage audience anyway, so maybe he’s slipping his cosmology into their heads can’t hurt :)
Dear all, Pierre Binétruy talked to us about De sitter norm in a meeting at the APC of Paris XIII, it is casual and very well done, why are you imagining any mathematical issues with the norm associated to describe the model of the universe ?
There is a certain place on the ambition and intelligence spectrum where you would strongly desire to help push humanity forward but don't have the means to do so, we're both in that place I believe. However, I also believe that it is possible to overcome your limitations, inborn or self-imposed :) However you choose to approach your life and your progress, do not give up!
Well into his 90s now and still pushing physics forward. When I first heard about CCC I was very skeptical, but Penrose has definitely convinced me in the years since. The man deserves at least another two Nobels for his various contributions to physics. Let's hope he gets a second one before he buys the farm!
Sir Roger articulates his descriptions in such an evocative way.... he almost implies a second way or third way of looking at an (apparently) single mathematical fact. Phrasing the singularity as a 'contradiction' is very thought provoking!
The emperor's new mind,and the nature of space and time are also one of my fav books, congratulations for Nobel prize And for discovering spin network, Thanks for blessing us with more knowledge about cosmos. , space time You have contributed a lot in research
No matter whether the theory is right or wrong, he and his colleagues working on CCC have given us a thought-provoking idea about the nature of the universe. I first heard about this in his interview with Robert Kuhn and in the middle of it when I understood what he was trying to explain, my mind was blown! It was like something "clicked" on the back of my mind. It was a wonderful idea that might have some kind of application in some related theories. Or he could be entirely right - only the future will tell us.
The question of the beginning is answered by the same conditions at end……same quantum fluctuation . Wittgenstein said that the answer to the riddle of life lies in the disappearing of the question….
I know nothing. Most of this went right over my head. But when he said a light ray doesn't experience the passage of time it made me wonder how it can redshift? or even have a speed?
But redshifting is not like decay, right? Is just a stretching of the wavelenght of the light emitted by the a source that is distancing away from the observer, if I understood correctly. Is not afected by time passing.
As I said prior your diagram gave me this picture in my head. Flip the cones. What this will show you is the jets will eject along the poles created by the flipped EMFS. Awesome Professor Penrose Awesome. Thanks
I'm stuck at Aeons. How they'll be generated by super duper black holes and how they transfer from one universe to another and through what they transfer? And he's saying these Aeons are signals, what type of signals are they? Radiation or any type of particle? Could anyone please explain this?
Nice talk. But Penrose is obviously wrong in saying that light rays don't register the passage of time. As light moves, it obviously registers time! So Minkowski's model of spacetime, and hence the concept of spacetime an sich, has to be wrong.
Penrose is right, because Quantum mechanics describes light rays not as objects that follow a fixed path through space and time, but as probability waves that represent different possibilities. Time is only one of the coordinates that describe the state of a quantum object. Time is therefore not something that is registered by light rays, but something that is described with light rays. Therefore, Penrose and Minkowski's model of space time has not to be wrong.
It is difficult to see the story in terms of how all the mass lost in the evaporation of black holes turning up again as leptons even if protons never decay to give the universe an overall steady state. The universe in the CMB is supposed to still be full of hydrogen and helium atoms that presumably will either be swallowed by black holes going forward or get ripped apart by the expansion of universe. Is Penrose saying that dark matter particles of plank mass recreates all these additional laptons through decay? But then where in the cycle and how do they get created in the cycle? The conformal part is still difficult to get one's head around. Which parts are of same shape and proportional dimensions but different sizes. The particles or the whole universe? And where is the Higg's field? Does that change to change the mass of particles? Does this rule out the problem of matter and antimatter as well? It there is no beginning or end then there is no creation of equal number matter and antimatter. What happens in the boundary between to eans? What does he mean by inflation before and not after the boundry? What kind of inflation and how? Surely not the expansion of universe faster than speed of light. Just because there are observational evidence these questions don't go away. There seems to be a lot of details still left to explain.
What if by creating physics, or observing, we are causing reality to create by this observation. Meaning the laws are whatever you want so long as it's consistent with observation
The source of all these infinite cycles of creation and dissolution is the ultimate Reality. This is defined as all pervading consciousness or God. This is eternal and is beyond space, time and causation. Since it is beyond our mind, thoughts can not reach there. It can not be described or known. At that level, knowing is being. In other words, the universe is simply a play of consciousness
If the universe is infinitely big does it make us infinitely small to the universe? If we're infinitely small do we really exist? Or we really are a simulation, a hologram, a dream?
0_o I think know how entropy is at maximum it was...in state of maximum entropy in the past that is also still in the future. If everything can enter the singularity and come out the other side of the blackhole. If we assume the other side of the singularity is another spacetime that's outside our spacetime and time will always pass independently on each side of the singularity. So on entrance side of the singularity (the blackhole) is always eternally stuck leading to one spot the the very beginning of sapcetime in that spacetime bubble. So on the exiting side of the singularity spacetime starts as soon as the blackhole is formed. So this means that you can have many big bangs overtime that have happened in the past but count as the future because it well was the future in that bubble of time. But would count as our past because that bubble came before the current bubble of time. Just idea anyways
He is firstly and foremost a mathematician, also a physicist and philosopher. A Fields Medal as a Mathematics Nobel Prize alternative is only awarded to those under 40 years.
Fortunately the evaporation of BHs takes 10^100 years and nobody can expect to ever see it. Thats always a plus for a theory that you have no evidence for.
Well, in this case anyone is invited and eligibile to form a theory and submit it for the Nobel Prize. It is not mandatory to prove it's working, innit? :))
So Professor Penrose, take your model of the singularity and the light cones, OK now if you have a spinning ⚫️ blacksphere them light cones in your diagram turn then the other way around join them around the blacksphere and my friend you have it. You see Professor Penrose what I believe you are showing is correct for light photons, but what's actually occurring is not what is shown. Flip the cones join the bases the wide ends lol. What this will show is a flipped EMFS and the jets that are seen are the result of the EMFS being flipped at the sphere. This creates the boundary, which appears as a 🕳 hole. But the blacksphere sits right there. Peace Professor Penrose, I hope they send this comment to you. Have a look. Love your work SIR. Peace ✌️ from Canada, eh.
Basically, his idea is that "Big Bang" occurs at the end of the universe, when the last black hole in the universe evaporates and theres nothing left.. So there was universe before ours, and will be after us, and so on..
I Have too multiple thoughts about new invention but it's not time to present. Once a day I will sure. Congratulations Dear Sir I really wanna This Nobel Prize Thanks a lot
In the Hindu Cosmology , there are four eons each lasting several million years and collapsing back to the source. The cycle stars again after a long time . Thistimate goes on infinitely. The source is the ul
Sir Roger quoted the birth of the universe was the end of the last one example the ( big bang) Would it have been possible that we existed before the last big bang and in the future figured out a way to protect our DNA from the compete destruction
The Penrose diagram is based on the singularity, yet a definition of Singularities are regions of space where the density of matter, or the curvature of spacetime, becomes infinite. In such locales, the standard *concepts of space and time cease to have any meaning.* Which means that the foundation of a black hole has not been resolved. A singularity is assumed to be in the center of black holes and yet its physics remains an enigma. Why should Sir Roger Penrose receive the Nobel prize for a mathematical conception, In other words, he won the Nobel prize for a hypothetical mathematical description? This should not be allowed! Also Comparing Feynman diagram with Penrose diagram is not legitimate, becaue Penrose diagrams are totally hypothetical and have not been observed!
Penrose is right. Consciousness is non-computational. When you understand something, that "aha!" moment is a non-computational jump through which something new is brought into existence out of Nothing. You cannot simulate that.
Don't miss Roger Penrose on the Nobel Prize Conversations podcast to be released on February 4. play.acast.com/s/nobelprizeconversations - 2020's guests have included Nobel Laureates Kip Thorne, Emmanuelle Charpentier, Andrea Ghez, Paul Nurse and Peter Doherty.
Made it video from Japan chemistry
To me, Roger Penrose should receive the Nobel just on his charts and scribbles alone lol :-) At 89 years old and giving such a remarkable lecture Penrose is a genius to say the least !!!!
@Tom Pickett: I totally agree with you! 👍👍👍
True geniuses can be recognized by the fact that they can explain complicated issues very well. And ROGER PENROSE is excellent at it! ❤️👏👏👏
And, of course, I am fascinated by his presented concept. 🙏
And by his, Anirban Bandyopadhyay, Stuart Hameroff and Jack Tuszyński Great Discoveries about consciousness!
And of course the fact that AI cannot even in principle become conscious does not entitle us to treat its (or stupidity of humans who created Chat GTP more precisely) we should by no means treat this threat lightly.
"And this is a Theorem which seems to have won a Nobel Prize" "seems". Sir Roger Penrose is not just a GIANT the Greatest Mind alive. But he was also so incredibly modest while speaking! And bewildered that for all the things that he has done it was just this one "little theorem" in particular that has won a Nobel.
No words in no human language can express what Sir Roger Penrose has done. He is the King of Kings!
The sheer speed and accuracy of this almost 90-year-old person's thought is breathtaking. The sound of this voice is perhaps the sound of our greatest living mind.
He is accustomed to having pupils like Stephen Hawkings. So that's his threshold. If God exists, he will ask Roger Penrose what the heck he did. And be none the wiser. "Imagine a flash on a trapped four dimensional surface, yeah". He lost me there somewhere while walking in the woods.
@@bjorntorlarssonGod is logically incoherent... Unlike Godels Incompletness Theorem.
LOL.
God means Simulator (which in Sir Roger Penrose metaphysics cannot exist)
I'm bewildered that religion still does have so much holdout in XXI Century!
Almost equally amazing is that Sir Roger and his father INVENTED the "never-ending staircase" that goes both up and down -- made most famous in the drawings of MC Escher.
I had assumed that this "staircase" was an ancient concept or, if not, that Escher had invented it.
In fact, after visiting an Escher exhibition in Europe, soon after the end of WW2, the Penroses -- on the train back to England -- decided to come up with something "Escheresque" -- which they did, quite quickly!
Penrose Snr published it in a psychology journal, then sent it to Escher who, of course, was impressed and excited by it, so incorporated it in drawings, and adapted it into other forms -- like the "never-ending waterfall."
Sir Roger does not get nearly enough credit for his incredibly inventive visual imagination!
Impressed with how Penrose is still able to carry himself at his age. Still an absolutely clear mind,
The enlightenment just keeps giving , well done Roger Penrose and all you who add to the wealth of human knowledge and understanding of nature .
Thanks to Penrose for his thoughts, and to the creators of this video for the excellent job they did with presenting his graphics.
BTW, it was interesting that all his graphics were hand drawn vice computer generated.
I was sorry that he was obviously rushing through his presentation; could not such a worthy talk be allowed a full hour vice thirty minutes?
An American continues rhe dumbing-down colonialism of which they are the very product. Genius.
It is interesting to hear him "collapse" it to half an hour on this four dimensional surface. They challenged him, and he met and won that challenge.
I listened to the other Nobel Prize takers too. What did they say? I don't remember. I don't understand this, but I remember it.
Play the video at 0.75 speed, the rushed presentation becomes more leisurely ;)
The speed stresses me out...impressive for any age. Enjoy him a lot in a long form format. 🙏
When you are squeezed down to infinity, you simply have to speak twice as fast. I have gotten to learn a couple of guys who one doesn't want to play chess with. But this Sir Roger Penrose is steps up on the food chain, so to speak.
"- Chess? Squares? How unimaginative!"
Play the video at 0.75 speed - less stress achieved ;)
I could listen to Sir Roger for hours. CCC is a very fascinating theoy
You can watch his interview with lex fridman in youtube itself.
Congratulations to Penrose and thank you for this lecture. It's brilliant, I loved it!
Penrose - absolutely awe-inspiring. An intellect of true penetration and creativity.
WHOOOO, I UNDERSTAND WHY HE IS A NOBEL PRIZE WINNER. COMPLEX HOWEVER SIR ROGER PENROSE MAKES IT EASY TO LISTEN. LOVELY PICTURES TOO THANKS
Roger one of my absolute favorites.
Most of what he described went right over my head from the start, but my gosh, what a mind this man has. On a par with Feynman and Dirac.
I love that, given 30 minutes only for a Nobel talk expected to reach a wide audience, he rushes through the ideas that won him the Nobel Prize, only to spend the remainder explaining and arguing for his much more recent radical cosmological theory.
When everyone else realizes Sir Roger’s theory of connected eons, they’ll say it was obvious
@@jaik195701 A lot more work to be done before we can be that confident
Well, Roger won the prize for work he did half a century ago, I forgive him for wanting to talk about ideas that are slightly newer.
Well it’s HIS Nobel Prize Lecture, and I think if you win the Nobel Prize you can talk about whatever you want. Besides, if he lives to 100, they’ll have to give him another Nobel Prize in Physics for his cosmology. I mean he has the Nobel committee as a hostage audience anyway, so maybe he’s slipping his cosmology into their heads can’t hurt :)
Just like how his ideas on black holes were considered radical in the 60s.
Amazing talk and makes perfect sense. I'm awaiting the alternative explanations to the anomalies in the CMBR allowing us to see previous eons.
Lecture begins at 3:11
Penrose, always putting some shapes together.
Dear all, Pierre Binétruy talked to us about De sitter norm in a meeting at the APC of Paris XIII, it is casual and very well done, why are you imagining any mathematical issues with the norm associated to describe the model of the universe ?
SIR ROGER PENROSE DESERVED THAT NOBEL PRIZE, AND K.A.I.S.T. KNOWS IT, FRIEND.❤
Congratulations to all winners! I am somewhat depressed that I will never achieve anything of that magnitude
There is a certain place on the ambition and intelligence spectrum where you would strongly desire to help push humanity forward but don't have the means to do so, we're both in that place I believe. However, I also believe that it is possible to overcome your limitations, inborn or self-imposed :) However you choose to approach your life and your progress, do not give up!
You should instead be elated about your membership to such an inventive species!
Well into his 90s now and still pushing physics forward.
When I first heard about CCC I was very skeptical, but Penrose has definitely convinced me in the years since.
The man deserves at least another two Nobels for his various contributions to physics. Let's hope he gets a second one before he buys the farm!
Sir Roger articulates his descriptions in such an evocative way.... he almost implies a second way or third way of looking at an (apparently) single mathematical fact. Phrasing the singularity as a 'contradiction' is very thought provoking!
Thank you very much, Sir. All the problems are hidden in the singularity.
Congrats Roger Penrose!!
I wish I had his energy... RIGHT NOW in my 30's!!!!
Great lecture Dr. Roger Penrose. If you had more time you could have said something about twistor theory ;)
He is Active
The emperor's new mind,and the nature of space and time are also one of my fav books, congratulations for Nobel prize
And for discovering spin network,
Thanks for blessing us with more knowledge about cosmos. , space time
You have contributed a lot in research
LEGEND!!!!❤️❤️❤️
Thank you Mr Penrose.
No matter whether the theory is right or wrong, he and his colleagues working on CCC have given us a thought-provoking idea about the nature of the universe. I first heard about this in his interview with Robert Kuhn and in the middle of it when I understood what he was trying to explain, my mind was blown! It was like something "clicked" on the back of my mind. It was a wonderful idea that might have some kind of application in some related theories. Or he could be entirely right - only the future will tell us.
The question of the beginning is answered by the same conditions at end……same quantum fluctuation .
Wittgenstein said that the answer to the riddle of life lies in the disappearing of the question….
Rodger is national treasure!
I would have to say international, as are his fans.
What an absolute gentleman legend.
What an absolutely fabulous mind!
Especially at 90 years old.
Fascinating to see the application of CCC
Bei den Zeichnungen von Penrose geht das Herz auf!
If a virtual particle pair is created from energy, and each half enters a different 'type' of black hole, something interesting happens?
I did not understand any single word he just said. This means he is amazing 👏
lmao 😁
I know nothing. Most of this went right over my head. But when he said a light ray doesn't experience the passage of time it made me wonder how it can redshift? or even have a speed?
But redshifting is not like decay, right? Is just a stretching of the wavelenght of the light emitted by the a source that is distancing away from the observer, if I understood correctly. Is not afected by time passing.
Nobel Prize!Your hard work and merite.Congratulation😍🌏
Great organization. Maybe its going to actually improve this species somehow. Cheers from Phi dept.
That was incredible.
As I said prior your diagram gave me this picture in my head. Flip the cones. What this will show you is the jets will eject along the poles created by the flipped EMFS. Awesome Professor Penrose Awesome. Thanks
Penrose is the man
I'm stuck at Aeons. How they'll be generated by super duper black holes and how they transfer from one universe to another and through what they transfer? And he's saying these Aeons are signals, what type of signals are they? Radiation or any type of particle?
Could anyone please explain this?
Nice talk. But Penrose is obviously wrong in saying that light rays don't register the passage of time. As light moves, it obviously registers time! So Minkowski's model of spacetime, and hence the concept of spacetime an sich, has to be wrong.
Very good point.
Penrose is right, because Quantum mechanics describes light rays not as objects that follow a fixed path through space and time, but as probability waves that represent different possibilities. Time is only one of the coordinates that describe the state of a quantum object. Time is therefore not something that is registered by light rays, but something that is described with light rays. Therefore, Penrose and Minkowski's model of space time has not to be wrong.
It is difficult to see the story in terms of how all the mass lost in the evaporation of black holes turning up again as leptons even if protons never decay to give the universe an overall steady state. The universe in the CMB is supposed to still be full of hydrogen and helium atoms that presumably will either be swallowed by black holes going forward or get ripped apart by the expansion of universe.
Is Penrose saying that dark matter particles of plank mass recreates all these additional laptons through decay? But then where in the cycle and how do they get created in the cycle?
The conformal part is still difficult to get one's head around. Which parts are of same shape and proportional dimensions but different sizes. The particles or the whole universe?
And where is the Higg's field? Does that change to change the mass of particles?
Does this rule out the problem of matter and antimatter as well? It there is no beginning or end then there is no creation of equal number matter and antimatter.
What happens in the boundary between to eans?
What does he mean by inflation before and not after the boundry? What kind of inflation and how? Surely not the expansion of universe faster than speed of light.
Just because there are observational evidence these questions don't go away. There seems to be a lot of details still left to explain.
Thank god for internet and free knowledge at the tip of my finger
@ 26 mins this visually conforms to my idea of karmic rebirth.
What if by creating physics, or observing, we are causing reality to create by this observation. Meaning the laws are whatever you want so long as it's consistent with observation
That is exactly the idea of some philosophical try try thought
That's exactly how it is. Reality is created in the image of consciousness.
The source of all these infinite cycles of creation and dissolution is the ultimate Reality. This is defined as all pervading consciousness or God. This is eternal and is beyond space, time and causation. Since it is beyond our mind, thoughts can not reach there. It can not be described or known. At that level, knowing is being. In other words, the universe is simply a play of consciousness
CONGRATULATIONS 👏👏🎉
thanks for your video, how can i search the articles about cosmology?
enter 'cosmology' into the search box
Enter exit from Belgium science technologi from Indonesia make me my country proud and happy
One day, by God's grace. I will be on stage representing the multidisciplinary field of Urban and Regional Planning Science.
did u now get it??
I wonder y, only physics or chemistry topics getting noble prize more, but not biology, mathematics and other subjects?
There is Nobel prize in Medicine and Fields Medal and Abel Prize are the Maths equivalent of Nobel Prize
so i didn't understand is there infinite universes ?
Sometimes light can be slower than our thoughts it takes so long for some light to reach us and we have already figured out the universe❤❤🎉🎉
This man's explaining skills are much greater if not equal to the skills of Feynman.... Feynman is Penrose with jokes
A genius
If the universe is infinitely big does it make us infinitely small to the universe? If we're infinitely small do we really exist? Or we really are a simulation, a hologram, a dream?
Dust in the Wind, by Kansas
We can only see how big we are relative to something else. There is no way to determine how big we actually are.
There is no universe in the first place. There is only consciousness. "Universe" is just an idea in consciousness.
@@visancosmin8991 Where is your evidence?.
0_o I think know how entropy is at maximum it was...in state of maximum entropy in the past that is also still in the future. If everything can enter the singularity and come out the other side of the blackhole. If we assume the other side of the singularity is another spacetime that's outside our spacetime and time will always pass independently on each side of the singularity. So on entrance side of the singularity (the blackhole) is always eternally stuck leading to one spot the the very beginning of sapcetime in that spacetime bubble. So on the exiting side of the singularity spacetime starts as soon as the blackhole is formed. So this means that you can have many big bangs overtime that have happened in the past but count as the future because it well was the future in that bubble of time. But would count as our past because that bubble came before the current bubble of time. Just idea anyways
Wow, that takes alot of brain power even just to begin to comprehend that idea...very well said though! 🙂
Now I know why Knuth looks so grumpy all the time. Penrose is a giant compared to him.
Admire
Thank you. Very nice.
People should read Shadows of the Mind.
What is it about? And who is the author?
I find my generation luvky to be born in the times of Roger Penrose.
If a generation is 25 years, Sir Roger has been among us for roughly 4 generations! We are blessed.
Me too 🙂
Extreme excellent video!!!
👏👏👏👏👏
Why is a prediction of understanding of a black hole win a noble prize?
Why did it take so long for him to get a Nobel prize?
He is firstly and foremost a mathematician, also a physicist and philosopher. A Fields Medal as a Mathematics Nobel Prize alternative is only awarded to those under 40 years.
Proof of Black holes wasn’t discovered until recently.
Seriously! who is voting this down? one of the greatest minds of out time and they're still haters.
Congrats dude! High five my man!
FREEZE ROGER IN CARBONITE.
Fortunately the evaporation of BHs takes 10^100 years and nobody can expect to ever see it. Thats always a plus for a theory that you have no evidence for.
Well, in this case anyone is invited and eligibile to form a theory and submit it for the Nobel Prize. It is not mandatory to prove it's working, innit? :))
@@CozminVasile lol 😁
❤️🙏🏻❤️❤️❤️
The anchor looks like jeff bezos
Can't believe 90 yr old
I was thinking the same thing.
Good
💐
BAM!!!
So Professor Penrose, take your model of the singularity and the light cones, OK now if you have a spinning ⚫️ blacksphere them light cones in your diagram turn then the other way around join them around the blacksphere and my friend you have it. You see Professor Penrose what I believe you are showing is correct for light photons, but what's actually occurring is not what is shown. Flip the cones join the bases the wide ends lol. What this will show is a flipped EMFS and the jets that are seen are the result of the EMFS being flipped at the sphere. This creates the boundary, which appears as a 🕳 hole. But the blacksphere sits right there. Peace Professor Penrose, I hope they send this comment to you. Have a look. Love your work SIR. Peace ✌️ from Canada, eh.
I say that is a singularity.
I was here. In infinity.
then why did you return?
i dont even understand what's the subject he's talking about
Basically, his idea is that "Big Bang" occurs at the end of the universe, when the last black hole in the universe evaporates and theres nothing left.. So there was universe before ours, and will be after us, and so on..
33:36 annnnnd mic drop 🎤
I Have too multiple thoughts about new invention but it's not time to present. Once a day I will sure.
Congratulations Dear Sir
I really wanna This Nobel Prize
Thanks a lot
🤣🤣🤣🤣
In the Hindu Cosmology , there are four eons each lasting several million years and collapsing back to the source. The cycle stars again after a long time . Thistimate goes on infinitely. The source is the ul
Very interesting.
Roger Penrose is way above tarrence tao
Can something infinit evaporate. Yada yada yada
Sir Roger quoted the birth of the universe was the end of the last one example the ( big bang) Would it have been possible that we existed before the last big bang and in the future figured out a way to protect our DNA from the compete destruction
Gravitational singularity prof. Penrose is a mathematical exoticism that has no physical reality
The Penrose diagram is based on the singularity, yet a definition of Singularities are regions of space where the density of matter, or the curvature of spacetime, becomes infinite. In such locales, the standard *concepts of space and time cease to have any meaning.* Which means that the foundation of a black hole has not been resolved. A singularity is assumed to be in the center of black holes and yet its physics remains an enigma. Why should Sir Roger Penrose receive the Nobel prize for a mathematical conception, In other words, he won the Nobel prize for a hypothetical mathematical description?
This should not be allowed! Also Comparing Feynman diagram with Penrose diagram is not legitimate, becaue Penrose diagrams are totally hypothetical and have not been observed!
he proved a fundamental theorem that you indeed get singularities generically
How would you explain the captured image of the M87 black hole?
I love listening to Penrose. He's as dumb as the rest of us. And that's gratifying. Yet he was privately educated. Which says much more.
Penrose's theory about AI is wrong.
Because ?
Ok
Penrose is right. Consciousness is non-computational. When you understand something, that "aha!" moment is a non-computational jump through which something new is brought into existence out of Nothing. You cannot simulate that.