Essential to a true understanding of God's Word, Dr. Michael McDaniel shows us how we are to "rightly divide" the word of truth. Go to graceage.org to learn more.
I really think God is working big time/overtime in these last days...getting the truth of his word, concerning the Gospel of grace out to the world...if the pastors in these large churches won't do it, then it will happen through social media.... GOD IS IN CONTROL. SHALOM
@@christsavesreadromans1096 UM! NO! THEY ARE NOT! STUDY!>>>>> Matthew 15:24 But he ( *JESUS * ) answered and said, I am *NOT* sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. Jesus told us who He came for, but the narcissistic egos on this planet just don't want to get it. They want to believe it is all about them. The only sin a non-Hebrew is guilty of, is being born in Adam. And that sin kills us all.
@@christsavesreadromans1096 *THE COMMANDMENTS WERE GIVEN TO THE HEBREW PEOPLE AS A MARRIAGE COVENANT BETWEEN GOD AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE, NOT YOU* *GOD MARRIED ISRAEL HERE* >>>> Exodus 19:8 And all the people answered together, and said, ALL THAT THE LORD HAS SPOKEN WE WILL DO. And Moses returned the words of the people unto the Lord. Exodus 24:3 And Moses came and told the people all the words of the Lord, and all the judgments: and all the people answered with one voice, and said, ALL THE WORDS WHICH THE LORD HAS SAID WE WILL DO. Exodus 24:7 And he took the book of the covenant and read in the audience of the people: and they said, ALL THAT THE LORD HAS SAID WE WILL DO, AND BE OBEDIENT. Were you at Mt. Sinia? Are you a true Hebrew? ---------------------------------------------------------------- These vows the Hebrew people took with God were a Marriage covenant. *GOD DIVORCED ISRAEL HERE:* >>>> Jeremiah 3:8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding *ISRAEL* committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a *BILL OF DIVORCE* yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also. ---------------------------------------------------------------- *JESUS CAME FOR HIS EX WIFE WHO IS ISRAEL HERE* >>>> Matthew 15:24 But he ( *JESUS * ) answered and said, I am *NOT* sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. ---------------------------------------------------------------- *GOD RE-MARRIES ISRAEL HERE:* >>> Revelation 19:7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb ( *JESUS* ) is come, and *HIS WIFE* ( *JESUS WIFE ISRAEL* ) hath made herself ready. *TA DA*
@@INSPECTORZAP That was for that particular time in that particular context, after his death, burial, and resurrection His ministry was for all. As it says clearly in Matthew 28:19-20, His commands are for all nations.
I have never come across a prechture as good as Dr McDaniel. His teaching and knowledge are excellent: Stay with the hundreds of lessons and you will be more than Simple KJV Prov1:1to5.
EXCELLENT!!! Well done! Can't wait to take this study further and learn more details. This clears up so much...connects the dots more clearly. Thank you so very much! Disregard those who oppose...which may be most. 2 Timothy 1 : 13 Hold fast the form of sound words, which thou hast heard of me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.
Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." What is Sin? 1 John 3:4 KJV says "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. Jesus said in Matthew 5:19 "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven..." This man talks deception. There is no wisdom in his words. Learn to rightly divide the word elsewhere. Beware! May his eyes be opened and he repent from his ways.
@@Ejisrael After studying the Bible years and years, I know that this Man tells the truth, so I strongly disagree with you. And you're the one who can't divide the Word rightly.
@@fsdfmsbcxxit’s music to my ears when people realise rightly dividing makes sense of the difference between the law and grace. Without rightly dividing the OT and the NT bringis total confusion. God is not the author of confusion.
All I can say is wow. I did not have the knowledge of this until tonight. My spirit is so calm now and the understanding is beyond words. Thank you so much. I have a way to go still but my confusion is dissipating rapidly. GOD BLESS YOU
MrNamge and ADaily you have just proven my point as to why we must rightly divide the Word. You have a great passion for your argument and that is well applauded, however, you have neglected one thing; the first rule of hermeneutics CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT. You cannot get an accurate depiction of what is meant in scripture using systematic theology (pulling scriptures out of context from all over the Bible to make a Doctrine).
MillenniumBible2001 Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." What is Sin? 1 John 3:4 KJV says "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. Jesus said in Matthew 5:19 "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven..." This man talks deception. There is no wisdom in his words. Learn to rightly divide the word elsewhere. Beware! May his eyes be opened and he repent from his ways.
The only stipulation required to start "the one true church " is that the doctrine never lines up with Catholic doctrine . So one day we will have fity thousand Protestant churches teaching a different doctrine as long as it is not Catholic . Then one day soon we will have one hundred thousand Protestant churches all teaching a different doctrine on salvation as long as it doesn't line up with the Catholic Church. Then one day we will have three hundred thousand Protestant churches all teaching a different doctrine as long as it is not Catholic doctrine . Then one day we will have four million "one true churches " all teaching a different doctrine as long as it is not what is taught by the Catholic Church . Then one day we will have two billion "one true churches as long as they don't teach Catholic doctrine . Then one day we will have six trillion "one true churches " as long as it doesn't line up with the Catholic Church . You can make as many "one true churches " as there stars in the heaven as long as it isn't the North Star of "the one Catholic Church"
What will it take to make us understand ?that constantly creating "one more "one true church " is certainly a tradition of men ? This is what happens when we let go of the apastolic Tradition .
Thanks for studying along with us. The best place I can think of is in the 1 Corinthians studies. Sessions 10 and 11. th-cam.com/video/T4WHB0KPoEc/w-d-xo.html
@@geneharris5994 Thank you. Thank goodness for rewind and replay. I'm an old fella so Pastor Mike's sudden shifts sets my old gray matter into lockup. I have to reboot and replay. 😂
If we are led by the Spirit, then we are indeed under grace and not the law. If we are in Christ, then the curse of the law will have no effect. But, the law remains for all those who are not led by the Spirit. The law will condemn ALL those, not just "Israel" who are not a new creation.
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the WORD OF TRUTH; If you rightly divide, Realize: For the law was given by Moses, but grace and TRUTH came by Jesus Christ.” And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.” Its not rightly dividing the Word but rather the Word of Truth. John 1:16-17
The core of this hinges on the correct interpretation of "rightly divide the word" from a book approved by the Roman Catholic Council of Nicea in 325. Why are the book of Enoch and Asher mentioned by not included? How does one rightly divide the following; Luke 11:52 - You take away the key of knowledge because you do not enter within yourself. Luke 17:21 - Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. Matthew 6:33 - But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. Luke 8:10 - And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand. Acts 7:48 "The most high dwells not in temples made with hands." Luke 17:20 - The Kingdom comes not with observation. The kingdom of God is within you. Amos 5:18 - Woe unto you that desire the day of the Lord! to what end is it for you? the day of the Lord is darkness, and not light. Matthew 6:22 - The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light. Psalm 78:2 - I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of old: Proverbs 1:6 - To understand a proverb, and the interpretation; the words of the wise, and their dark sayings. Psalms 78:21- I will open my mouth in a parable. I will utter dark sayings of old, which we have heard and known and our fathers have told us. STATEMENTS FROM JESUS (Not Church teachings): John 5:30 - I can of my own self do, nothing. John 14:12 - The works I do, you can do, and greater John 16:23 - You shall ask me for nothing John 16:26 - I do not say that I will pray to the Father for you John 5:3I - If I bear witness about myself, my witness is false Luke 12:14 - Who made me judge or divider over you ? CHURCH TEACHINGS CONTRADICTORY TO SCRIPTURE: Luke 8:10 - And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand. Hebrews 6:1 - Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God. Romans 2:29 "He is not a Jew which is one outwardly, but he is a Jew which is one inwardly and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter."
John Lee the Bible existed before Nicea . Nicea was not about a selection of the Cannon . Nicea was a dispute over the nature of Jesus . The Catholic Church already had the Christian Cannon ; the problem with the pre Nicean Cannon was it was written in four different languages . What Jerome did was consolidated a book of four different languages all into one Latin language . One more thing that may be helpful . The Catholic Vulgate is not an attempt to copy the Greek Septuagint . The Latin Vulgate is a statistical consideration of several different sources such as Coptic , Greek, Hebrew (which becomes the Masoretic ) and the Syrian text . The reason for this is because the Christian Church was a functional church hundreds of years before the birth of Constine . This is why the Coptic Bible is statistically the same as the Catholic Bible . This is why the Syrian Bible is statistically the same as the Catholic Bible . The real dispute at this point is the Greeks and Hebrews (eventually the Masoretic text ) Jews hate Both Greeks and Christianity . The Masoretic text was changed in places to avoid Christian claims to the deity of Jesus in the old testament . Then the Protestants copy the Masoretic text to create a more pure Christian Bible . The King James does not line up with the Masoretic text from which it comes . If you don't think I know what im saying ; you can purchase a copy of The Masoretic text from the Jewish publication society and compare it to the King James . They are not the same .
There are well over one hundred holy books mentioned in the Bible that are not in the Bible. Short and sweet ; Enoch is not in the Bible not because of corruption of the church . Enoch is not in the Bible because Enoch didn't write it . The content of the book of Enoch was certainly an ancient tradition but the problem was it was written over a thousand years separate from Enoch . And the latter (Chronicler) didn't put his own name to his Enoch . The word is (pseudopigraphiah) : books written within two hundred years of the birth of Christ and perscribed Authorship to people who did not write them ...i.e. Enoch .
The only way we can possibly rightly divide God's word is through The Spirit of Truth, otherwise everything we would divide would be nothing more than the cunning craftiness of man. Only with the aid of the Spirit can we arive at spiritual truth.
I suggest a new title for this video and book: Wrongly Dividing the Word.Chapter One: Give the wrong definition of the Greek word for dividing. Chapter Two: Divide up the entire Bible in a way that promotes your own brand of theology regardless to what the truth is. This protects your "sacred" doctrines that are undermined by passages in the avoided verses not said to be for Christians. Chapter Three: Invent a commentary for the 13 *protected* NT Books so that it makes your own doctrine look good. Chapter Four: Create powerpoints/chalk drawings that illustrate your doctrines that cannot be found in scripture outlined as shown. If you do not listen to Truth, you will only have the lie left to hear.
Dennis Marks Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." What is Sin? 1 John 3:4 KJV says "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. Jesus said in Matthew 5:19 "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven..." This man talks deception. There is no wisdom in his words. Learn to rightly divide the word elsewhere. Beware! May his eyes be opened and he repent from his ways.
Dennis Marks I'm going to be writing a comment it's going to be a little lengthy at the top of this for everyone who is reading the comments please read it
I work with a guy who teaches this. Well. He tells me doesn't anymore. I found his website. And it's still up. Wouldn't you take it down if you didn't believe it anymore?? I would. But this makes no sense. Just another false teaching.
2 Tim 2:15 in context is about *THE RESURECTION* Bro! In verse 18 and you people keep ignoring this fact! WHY? 2 Timothy 2 King James Version 18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that *THE RESURECTION* is past already; and overthrow the faith of some. Who was Paul REALLY speaking to? ANSWER: Romans 9 King James Version 3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: 4 Who are Israelites; >>>>>Romans 11 King James Version 13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office: >>>>>>>For I speak to you Gentiles my kinsmen according to the flesh: 4 Who are Israelites; GENTILES=NON-CIRCUMCISED ISRAELITES GENTILES= NON RELIGIOUS ISRAELITES GENTILES= PAULS KINSMAN GENTILES= LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL GENTILES>>>>>Matthew 15:24 But he ( JESUS * ) answered and said, I am *NOT sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel. WATCH MY FRIEND DESTROY RD>>> FACTS! Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth in 4 Minutes Scott Clarke th-cam.com/video/Xxnzerf8D0w/w-d-xo.html
Thanks for your comment. Arguing that right division should be limited to simply the context in the video shared is a weak argument and dangerous teaching. If you believe all of the Bible is absolute Truth, you simply cannot reconcile your Bible without right division. There are too many seemingly contradictory scriptures. For more critique on the video you shared, simply look at the comments and all the questions and criticisms of the teaching, which are the majority of the comments. Best of luck in your studies.
@@geneharris5994 I taught RD for 5 years. Your long winded retort is not an argument against the truth I posted. You post no scriptures to refute what I posted at all. 2 Tim. 2:15 is transparently clear that it is about the resurrection of the dead. Which were the people that raised from the dead and walked around the cities after Christ rose from the dead. Read it again>>>> 2 Timothy 2 King James Version 18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that THE RESURECTION is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.
@@geneharris5994 In addition: My friends video I posted for you is not dangerous. Only people who are afraid of the truth, hide behind words like that is dangerous. You're sounding like a Godless, spiritually dead left-wing person who love to suppress the truth.
What about Romans 7:14-25...is Paul a schizophrenic? In Romans 6 he says we are not under law but under grace... But then in Romans 7 he says the law is good and that he delights in the law of God. So how do you reconcile these seemingly opposing views on the law of God? The key is ch 7 verse 23... Paul clearly is discussing more than one law. When you understand this then you can begin to understand why Paul seems to contradict himself constantly. Truth is that, upon careful consideration, it's evident that he never once says NOT to obey the laws of God anywhere in any of his letters. He does say that without messiah then circumsision of the flesh is useless. But he also says that if you KEEP the laws it IS INDEED of use to you! The confusion comes in because Paul talks about multiple laws besides the law of God, including the law of sin and death as well as man-made Jewish laws that aren't even in the old testament and were not given by God yet that the Pharisees were pressuring the people to keep. (Evidence for that was given by our saviour himself in Mark 7:1-13 where he compares the traditions of men that they were pushing against the law of God given through Moses.) You have to understand a little more about the people Paul was addressing and what they already knew to understand him. They knew more of what the old testament said than modern Christians usually do because it was their only scripture at the time & we today are often instructed to start in the new testament rather than at the beginning of the book) And they knew more than modern Christians do about the Jewish man made laws that were being pushed by the Pharisees back in that day. Paul was discussing a variety of different things that were NOT all part of the law of God yet were all translated simply into the English word "law". Understanding this is the key to understanding that Paul never spoke against keeping the laws of God. In fact he said we uphold them & he himself did. Romans 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? Certainly not! On the contrary, we establish the law. Acts 18:21 shows that Paul kept the feasts that are instructed in the law of God. And Acts 21 showcases Paul obeying the law of God after being directly accused of not keeping the law.
6:20 Wait! It is true that we are not _under_ the law, for the law does not have the power to save us, but we still keep the morality that is found in the law. We still do not kill, covet, commit adultery, worship any other god, etc.. I think that I know what he was "trying" to say, but I don't agree with the way he said it.
Actually, you do commit all those, no one can keep the ten commandments, that was the purpose of the ten commandments, to show us we're all guilty. You say: But, I haven't killed anyone or slept with other women, if you purposed in your heart, your guilty, that's why we need God's grace, which is Christ payment for your sin.
Great teaching my friend ! No disrespect, but I sensed a little arrogance? Dispensationalism is the only true way to understand The Word of God ! However, if we are to win lost souls to the grace message, we must always remain humble ! We don't wanna scare the "religious but lost" crowd away 😎
Peace be with you This man appears to think that rightly dividing the scripture has to do with what order it appears in the scripture. St Paul did not come to take a single word back that our Lord had spoken. He came to tell the Gentiles that they we partakers in our lord Gospel. (Eph 3:4-6) Why so many try to invent a new Gospel for him I do not know. He preached the Gospel of the Kingdom (Acts 28:30-31) St Paul is right when he says we are under Grace, but this long known (1 Peter 1:10) St Paul says we receive this Grace though faith in Jesus Christ We must not just believe that Jesus died for us but that he came lived and taught. Everything Jesus taught was with the knowledge of the Grace he was bringing. This is why his final request in Matthews Gospel was to go about and teach all he had commanded. (Matt 28:18-20) That is why he gave us a Church to ensure what was said was taught properly (Matt 18:15-20) This man is right the bible should be rightly divided, but wrong in the way he is going about it. He seems to want to separate Jesus from his Gospel of Grace. God bless you
MrKev1664 if you wish to believe that the gospel of the Kingdom and the gospel of Paul are the same gospel okay live in yourself delusion but what Paul preached was the opposite of what Jesus preached you ignore scripture and live in religion you forget the parable of the fig tree Luke 13:7 you ignore that it was exactly one year after that was given that Steven was killed you ignore when Paul said through Israel's fall salvation has now come to the Gentiles to provoke the Jew to jealousy you're taking the kingdom message and you're mixing it with Paul's message in this video he's very clear on the differences between the two messages even a blind man can see it but you're even Blinder than the blind you don't see the difference between the two gospels because your eyes have been darkened if you wish to live under the law then you are a debtor to follow the whole law but no man can follow it so you're going to fail you're going to burn in hell for it for if you think through your circumcision salvation is going to come to you it profit you nothing your circumcision has been made uncircumcision no flesh will show glory in the sight of Our Lord but if you wish to glorify yourself through your works they're your religious foolishness be my guest Romans through Philemon are what we follow today to rightly divide means to understand Peter preach works Paul preached Grace there are two distinct gospels here there is versus that backup Paul that's even in Luke you do not study but most people nowadays are so brainwashed by their denominations they don't even understand that so of course you're not going to understand what rightly divided means because you don't even study your Bible
Catholics do not read the Bible. The Pope uses to say that is an old fashioned book, full of miths and fables.That's why catholics believers are impaired of understanding it . They follow a religion with a bunch of humans traditions. How can anyone expect a true biblical interpretation from the catholics ?.
Hildebrando Gonzalez that's why the Catholics are a cult they don't follow Doctrine the Apostle Paul talk more about Doctrine than anyone in the entire Bible these people don't follow Doctrine they follow their feelings
@@inthedark334 Well said. Rightly dividing the truth in the Bible is one of the greatest revelations to me. It has taken away a lot of the confusion. Thank you. But why have you not bothered to rightly divide the sentences?
The bible most certainly was not written in English. So understanding 6th grade English is irrelevant to true scripture study. What a condescending remark to make. Smh...disappointed.
Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." What is Sin? 1 John 3:4 KJV says "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. Jesus said in Matthew 5:19 "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven..." This man talks deception. There is no wisdom in his words. Learn to rightly divide the word elsewhere. Beware! May his eyes be opened and he repent from his ways.
Brother Albert Israel you religious full I know I'm being a little rude but you don't understand where you're living Matthew Mark Luke and John is for the Jews in the Kingdom message you're not under that message Jesus came to the Jews the messages he preached or for the Jews not for you I am a Jew and when I read what Jesus says it hits me like a bullet but when I read Paul and it hits me like a nuclear bomb how you can be so blind shows just how arrogant you are wake up get out of your religion and actually read the Bible
I really think God is working big time/overtime in these last days...getting the truth of his word, concerning the Gospel of grace out to the world...if the pastors in these large churches won't do it, then it will happen through social media....
GOD IS IN CONTROL.
SHALOM
part of rightly dividing the word of God is to separate the law from grace.
All of Jesus’s commands are for us today (Matthew 28:19-20)
@@christsavesreadromans1096 UM! NO! THEY ARE NOT!
STUDY!>>>>>
Matthew 15:24 But he ( *JESUS * ) answered and said, I am *NOT* sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Jesus told us who He came for, but the narcissistic egos
on this planet just don't want to get it.
They want to believe it is all about them.
The only sin a non-Hebrew is guilty of, is being born in Adam. And that sin kills us all.
@@christsavesreadromans1096 *THE COMMANDMENTS WERE GIVEN TO THE HEBREW PEOPLE AS A MARRIAGE COVENANT BETWEEN GOD AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE, NOT YOU*
*GOD MARRIED ISRAEL HERE* >>>>
Exodus 19:8 And all the people answered together, and said, ALL THAT THE LORD HAS SPOKEN WE WILL DO. And Moses returned the words of the people unto the Lord.
Exodus 24:3 And Moses came and told the people all the words of the Lord, and all the judgments: and all the people answered with one voice, and said, ALL THE WORDS WHICH THE LORD HAS SAID WE WILL DO.
Exodus 24:7 And he took the book of the covenant and read in the audience of the people: and they said, ALL THAT THE LORD HAS SAID WE WILL DO, AND BE OBEDIENT.
Were you at Mt. Sinia?
Are you a true Hebrew?
----------------------------------------------------------------
These vows the Hebrew people took with God were a Marriage covenant.
*GOD DIVORCED ISRAEL HERE:* >>>>
Jeremiah 3:8 And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding *ISRAEL* committed adultery I had put her away, and given her a *BILL OF DIVORCE* yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but went and played the harlot also.
----------------------------------------------------------------
*JESUS CAME FOR HIS EX WIFE WHO IS ISRAEL HERE* >>>>
Matthew 15:24 But he ( *JESUS * ) answered and said, I am *NOT* sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
----------------------------------------------------------------
*GOD RE-MARRIES ISRAEL HERE:* >>>
Revelation 19:7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb ( *JESUS* ) is come, and
*HIS WIFE* ( *JESUS WIFE ISRAEL* ) hath made herself ready.
*TA DA*
@@INSPECTORZAP That was for that particular time in that particular context, after his death, burial, and resurrection His ministry was for all. As it says clearly in Matthew 28:19-20, His commands are for all nations.
Love this. Having the hardest time finding a lesson on why the kjv is the only inspired word.
Oh boy if you like this you should check out the rest of his studies. Amazing
I have never come across a prechture as good as Dr McDaniel. His teaching and knowledge are excellent: Stay with the hundreds of lessons and you will be more than Simple KJV Prov1:1to5.
What about non english speaking people?
EXCELLENT!!! Well done! Can't wait to take this study further and learn more details. This clears up so much...connects the dots more clearly. Thank you so very much! Disregard those who oppose...which may be most. 2 Timothy 1 : 13 Hold fast the form of sound words, which thou hast heard of me, in faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.
Any update on the study?
I've seen a lot of stuff on this subject over the years, and this is probably the best one Ive seen.
Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."
What is Sin? 1 John 3:4 KJV says "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Jesus said in Matthew 5:19 "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven..."
This man talks deception. There is no wisdom in his words. Learn to rightly divide the word elsewhere. Beware! May his eyes be opened and he repent from his ways.
@@Ejisrael
After studying the Bible years and years, I know that this Man tells the truth, so I strongly disagree with you. And you're the one who can't divide the Word rightly.
Rightly dividing the word of Truth has nothing to do with dispensationalism
@@fsdfmsbcxxit’s music to my ears when people realise rightly dividing makes sense of the difference between the law and grace. Without rightly dividing the OT and the NT bringis total confusion. God is not the author of confusion.
@@EjisraelI hope you’re following the Sabbath because those who don’t are to be put to death according to the Exodus 31:14
All I can say is wow. I did not have the knowledge of this until tonight. My spirit is so calm now and the understanding is beyond words. Thank you so much. I have a way to go still but my confusion is dissipating rapidly. GOD BLESS YOU
Me too🙏
So happy for you Christie. How’s your faith going ?
God is working wonders in our camp! We fly soon.. Maranatha
Amen and amen!
What a blessing thank you so much
Well done.
Wonderful Teaching brother Michael absolutely! Folk complaining have no understanding nor have listened to your video to understand completely.
Thank you Mr McDaniel. :)
This makes too much sense to be real!
Love it subscribed
MrNamge and ADaily you have just proven my point as to why we must rightly divide the Word. You have a great passion for your argument and that is well applauded, however, you have neglected one thing; the first rule of hermeneutics CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT. You cannot get an accurate depiction of what is meant in scripture using systematic theology (pulling scriptures out of context from all over the Bible to make a Doctrine).
MillenniumBible2001 Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."
What is Sin? 1 John 3:4 KJV says "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Jesus said in Matthew 5:19 "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven..."
This man talks deception. There is no wisdom in his words. Learn to rightly divide the word elsewhere. Beware! May his eyes be opened and he repent from his ways.
Soldier Eldad Israel "For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth." Can you read?
There are forty thousand Protestant churches all teaching a different doctrine generally centered around what is required to be saved by Christ .
The only stipulation required to start "the one true church " is that the doctrine never lines up with Catholic doctrine .
So one day we will have fity thousand Protestant churches teaching a different doctrine as long as it is not Catholic .
Then one day soon we will have one hundred thousand Protestant churches all teaching a different doctrine on salvation as long as it doesn't line up with the Catholic Church.
Then one day we will have three hundred thousand Protestant churches all teaching a different doctrine as long as it is not Catholic doctrine .
Then one day we will have four million "one true churches " all teaching a different doctrine as long as it is not what is taught by the Catholic Church .
Then one day we will have two billion "one true churches as long as they don't teach Catholic doctrine .
Then one day we will have six trillion "one true churches " as long as it doesn't line up with the Catholic Church .
You can make as many "one true churches " as there stars in the heaven as long as it isn't the North Star of "the one Catholic Church"
What will it take to make us understand ?that constantly creating "one more "one true church " is certainly a tradition of men ? This is what happens when we let go of the apastolic Tradition .
@@thebiblestudyhelper9389 So, worshiping Mary is required for the "one true church?"
@@thebiblestudyhelper9389 a Catholic Bible study helper... yes
@@thebiblestudyhelper9389So what’s your point?
I agree with Pastor Mike but I need the verses/books that explain the mystery.
Thanks for studying along with us. The best place I can think of is in the 1 Corinthians studies. Sessions 10 and 11. th-cam.com/video/T4WHB0KPoEc/w-d-xo.html
@@geneharris5994 Thank you.
Thank goodness for rewind and replay. I'm an old fella so Pastor Mike's sudden shifts sets my old gray matter into lockup. I have to reboot and replay. 😂
@@geneharris5994 This is a BIG ask but is there any possible way to get a digital copy of Pastor Mike's notes?
Amen
If we are led by the Spirit, then we are indeed under grace and not the law. If we are in Christ, then the curse of the law will have no effect. But, the law remains for all those who are not led by the Spirit. The law will condemn ALL those, not just "Israel" who are not a new creation.
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the WORD OF TRUTH;
If you rightly divide, Realize:
For the law was given by Moses, but grace and TRUTH came by Jesus Christ.”
And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.”
Its not rightly dividing the Word but rather the Word of Truth. John 1:16-17
Not a chance, if you use the KJV the Bible explains the Bible. It's perfectly clear, and I never have a problem understanding the Bible.
Rev 2:2, 2 Timothy 1:15........
Thank you for this video!
The core of this hinges on the correct interpretation of "rightly divide the word" from a book approved by the Roman Catholic Council of Nicea in 325. Why are the book of Enoch and Asher mentioned by not included? How does one rightly divide the following;
Luke 11:52 - You take away the key of knowledge because you do not enter within yourself.
Luke 17:21 - Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
Matthew 6:33 - But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Luke 8:10 - And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.
Acts 7:48 "The most high dwells not in temples made with hands."
Luke 17:20 - The Kingdom comes not with observation. The kingdom of God is within you.
Amos 5:18 - Woe unto you that desire the day of the Lord! to what end is it for you? the day of the Lord is darkness, and not light.
Matthew 6:22 - The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light.
Psalm 78:2 - I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of old:
Proverbs 1:6 - To understand a proverb, and the interpretation; the words of the wise, and their dark sayings.
Psalms 78:21- I will open my mouth in a parable. I will utter dark sayings of old, which we have heard and known and our fathers have told us.
STATEMENTS FROM JESUS (Not Church teachings):
John 5:30 - I can of my own self do, nothing.
John 14:12 - The works I do, you can do, and greater
John 16:23 - You shall ask me for nothing
John 16:26 - I do not say that I will pray to the Father for you
John 5:3I - If I bear witness about myself, my witness is false
Luke 12:14 - Who made me judge or divider over you ?
CHURCH TEACHINGS CONTRADICTORY TO SCRIPTURE:
Luke 8:10 - And he said, Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God: but to others in parables; that seeing they might not see, and hearing they might not understand.
Hebrews 6:1 - Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God.
Romans 2:29 "He is not a Jew which is one outwardly, but he is a Jew which is one inwardly and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, not in the letter."
John Lee the Bible existed before Nicea .
Nicea was not about a selection of the Cannon .
Nicea was a dispute over the nature of Jesus .
The Catholic Church already had the Christian Cannon ; the problem with the pre Nicean Cannon was it was written in four different languages .
What Jerome did was consolidated a book of four different languages all into one Latin language .
One more thing that may be helpful . The Catholic Vulgate is not an attempt to copy the Greek Septuagint .
The Latin Vulgate is a statistical consideration of several different sources such as Coptic , Greek, Hebrew (which becomes the Masoretic ) and the Syrian text .
The reason for this is because the Christian Church was a functional church hundreds of years before the birth of Constine .
This is why the Coptic Bible is statistically the same as the Catholic Bible .
This is why the Syrian Bible is statistically the same as the Catholic Bible .
The real dispute at this point is the Greeks and Hebrews (eventually the Masoretic text )
Jews hate Both Greeks and Christianity .
The Masoretic text was changed in places to avoid Christian claims to the deity of Jesus in the old testament .
Then the Protestants copy the Masoretic text to create a more pure Christian Bible .
The King James does not line up with the Masoretic text from which it comes .
If you don't think I know what im saying ; you can purchase a copy of The Masoretic text from the Jewish publication society and compare it to the King James . They are not the same .
There are well over one hundred holy books mentioned in the Bible that are not in the Bible.
Short and sweet ; Enoch is not in the Bible not because of corruption of the church . Enoch is not in the Bible because Enoch didn't write it . The content of the book of Enoch was certainly an ancient tradition but the problem was it was written over a thousand years separate from Enoch . And the latter (Chronicler) didn't put his own name to his Enoch .
The word is (pseudopigraphiah) : books written within two hundred years of the birth of Christ and perscribed Authorship to people who did not write them ...i.e. Enoch .
The only way we can possibly rightly divide God's word is through The Spirit of Truth, otherwise everything we would divide would be nothing more than the cunning craftiness of man.
Only with the aid of the Spirit can we arive at spiritual truth.
I suggest a new title for this video and book: Wrongly Dividing the Word.Chapter One: Give the wrong definition of the Greek word for dividing. Chapter Two: Divide up the entire Bible in a way that promotes your own brand of theology regardless to what the truth is. This protects your "sacred" doctrines that are undermined by passages in the avoided verses not said to be for Christians. Chapter Three: Invent a commentary for the 13 *protected* NT Books so that it makes your own doctrine look good. Chapter Four: Create powerpoints/chalk drawings that illustrate your doctrines that cannot be found in scripture outlined as shown. If you do not listen to Truth, you will only have the lie left to hear.
Dennis Marks Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."
What is Sin? 1 John 3:4 KJV says "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Jesus said in Matthew 5:19 "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven..."
This man talks deception. There is no wisdom in his words. Learn to rightly divide the word elsewhere. Beware! May his eyes be opened and he repent from his ways.
Dennis Marks I'm going to be writing a comment it's going to be a little lengthy at the top of this for everyone who is reading the comments please read it
I work with a guy who teaches this. Well. He tells me doesn't anymore. I found his website. And it's still up. Wouldn't you take it down if you didn't believe it anymore?? I would. But this makes no sense. Just another false teaching.
2 Tim 2:15 in context is about *THE RESURECTION* Bro!
In verse 18 and you people keep ignoring this fact!
WHY?
2 Timothy 2
King James Version
18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that *THE RESURECTION* is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.
Who was Paul REALLY speaking to?
ANSWER:
Romans 9
King James Version
3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:
4 Who are Israelites;
>>>>>Romans 11
King James Version
13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I magnify mine office:
>>>>>>>For I speak to you Gentiles
my kinsmen according to the flesh: 4 Who are Israelites;
GENTILES=NON-CIRCUMCISED ISRAELITES
GENTILES= NON RELIGIOUS ISRAELITES
GENTILES= PAULS KINSMAN
GENTILES= LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL
GENTILES>>>>>Matthew 15:24 But he ( JESUS * ) answered and said, I am *NOT sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
WATCH MY FRIEND DESTROY RD>>>
FACTS!
Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth in 4 Minutes
Scott Clarke
th-cam.com/video/Xxnzerf8D0w/w-d-xo.html
Thanks for your comment. Arguing that right division should be limited to simply the context in the video shared is a weak argument and dangerous teaching. If you believe all of the Bible is absolute Truth, you simply cannot reconcile your Bible without right division. There are too many seemingly contradictory scriptures. For more critique on the video you shared, simply look at the comments and all the questions and criticisms of the teaching, which are the majority of the comments. Best of luck in your studies.
@@geneharris5994 I taught RD for 5 years.
Your long winded retort is not an argument against the truth I posted. You post no scriptures to refute what I posted at all.
2 Tim. 2:15 is transparently clear that it is about the resurrection of the dead. Which were the people that raised from the dead and walked around the cities after Christ rose from the dead.
Read it again>>>>
2 Timothy 2
King James Version
18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that THE RESURECTION is past already; and overthrow the faith of some.
@@geneharris5994 In addition: My friends video I posted for you is not dangerous. Only people who are afraid of the truth, hide behind words like that is dangerous.
You're sounding like a Godless, spiritually dead left-wing person who love to suppress the truth.
What about Romans 7:14-25...is Paul a schizophrenic? In Romans 6 he says we are not under law but under grace... But then in Romans 7 he says the law is good and that he delights in the law of God. So how do you reconcile these seemingly opposing views on the law of God? The key is ch 7 verse 23... Paul clearly is discussing more than one law. When you understand this then you can begin to understand why Paul seems to contradict himself constantly. Truth is that, upon careful consideration, it's evident that he never once says NOT to obey the laws of God anywhere in any of his letters. He does say that without messiah then circumsision of the flesh is useless. But he also says that if you KEEP the laws it IS INDEED of use to you! The confusion comes in because Paul talks about multiple laws besides the law of God, including the law of sin and death as well as man-made Jewish laws that aren't even in the old testament and were not given by God yet that the Pharisees were pressuring the people to keep. (Evidence for that was given by our saviour himself in Mark 7:1-13 where he compares the traditions of men that they were pushing against the law of God given through Moses.) You have to understand a little more about the people Paul was addressing and what they already knew to understand him. They knew more of what the old testament said than modern Christians usually do because it was their only scripture at the time & we today are often instructed to start in the new testament rather than at the beginning of the book) And they knew more than modern Christians do about the Jewish man made laws that were being pushed by the Pharisees back in that day. Paul was discussing a variety of different things that were NOT all part of the law of God yet were all translated simply into the English word "law". Understanding this is the key to understanding that Paul never spoke against keeping the laws of God. In fact he said we uphold them & he himself did.
Romans 3:31 Do we then make void the law through faith? Certainly not! On the contrary, we establish the law.
Acts 18:21 shows that Paul kept the feasts that are instructed in the law of God.
And Acts 21 showcases Paul obeying the law of God after being directly accused of not keeping the law.
th-cam.com/video/s6S5PXWxlVg/w-d-xo.html
this video should help you with that.
6:20 Wait! It is true that we are not _under_ the law, for the law does not have the power to save us, but we still keep the morality that is found in the law. We still do not kill, covet, commit adultery, worship any other god, etc.. I think that I know what he was "trying" to say, but I don't agree with the way he said it.
***** I agree with you.
***** Peace and blessings!
Actually, you do commit all those, no one can keep the ten commandments, that was the purpose of the ten commandments, to show us we're all guilty. You say: But, I haven't killed anyone or slept with other women, if you purposed in your heart, your guilty, that's why we need God's grace, which is Christ payment for your sin.
I see the Bible as a simultaneous equation... not simple math.
But yet so simple, a child can understand it.
Great teaching my friend ! No disrespect, but I sensed a little arrogance? Dispensationalism is the only true way to understand The Word of God ! However, if we are to win lost souls to the grace message, we must always remain humble ! We don't wanna scare the "religious but lost" crowd away 😎
Peace be with you
This man appears to think that rightly dividing the scripture has to do with what order it appears in the scripture.
St Paul did not come to take a single word back that our Lord had spoken.
He came to tell the Gentiles that they we partakers in our lord Gospel. (Eph 3:4-6)
Why so many try to invent a new Gospel for him I do not know.
He preached the Gospel of the Kingdom (Acts 28:30-31)
St Paul is right when he says we are under Grace, but this long known (1 Peter 1:10)
St Paul says we receive this Grace though faith in Jesus Christ
We must not just believe that Jesus died for us but that he came lived and taught.
Everything Jesus taught was with the knowledge of the Grace he was bringing.
This is why his final request in Matthews Gospel was to go about and teach all he had commanded. (Matt 28:18-20)
That is why he gave us a Church to ensure what was said was taught properly (Matt 18:15-20)
This man is right the bible should be rightly divided, but wrong in the way he is going about it.
He seems to want to separate Jesus from his Gospel of Grace.
God bless you
MrKev1664 at least we only have one church .
MrKev1664 if you wish to believe that the gospel of the Kingdom and the gospel of Paul are the same gospel okay live in yourself delusion but what Paul preached was the opposite of what Jesus preached you ignore scripture and live in religion you forget the parable of the fig tree Luke 13:7 you ignore that it was exactly one year after that was given that Steven was killed you ignore when Paul said through Israel's fall salvation has now come to the Gentiles to provoke the Jew to jealousy you're taking the kingdom message and you're mixing it with Paul's message in this video he's very clear on the differences between the two messages even a blind man can see it but you're even Blinder than the blind you don't see the difference between the two gospels because your eyes have been darkened if you wish to live under the law then you are a debtor to follow the whole law but no man can follow it so you're going to fail you're going to burn in hell for it for if you think through your circumcision salvation is going to come to you it profit you nothing your circumcision has been made uncircumcision no flesh will show glory in the sight of Our Lord but if you wish to glorify yourself through your works they're your religious foolishness be my guest Romans through Philemon are what we follow today to rightly divide means to understand Peter preach works Paul preached Grace there are two distinct gospels here there is versus that backup Paul that's even in Luke you do not study but most people nowadays are so brainwashed by their denominations they don't even understand that so of course you're not going to understand what rightly divided means because you don't even study your Bible
Catholics do not read the Bible. The Pope uses to say that is an old fashioned book, full of miths and fables.That's why catholics believers are impaired of understanding it . They follow a religion with a bunch of humans traditions. How can anyone expect a true biblical interpretation from the catholics ?.
Hildebrando Gonzalez that's why the Catholics are a cult they don't follow Doctrine the Apostle Paul talk more about Doctrine than anyone in the entire Bible these people don't follow Doctrine they follow their feelings
@@inthedark334 Well said. Rightly dividing the truth in the Bible is one of the greatest revelations to me. It has taken away a lot of the confusion. Thank you.
But why have you not bothered to rightly divide the sentences?
The bible most certainly was not written in English. So understanding 6th grade English is irrelevant to true scripture study. What a condescending remark to make. Smh...disappointed.
So that's what you got from what he was saying?
Teaching on how to eliminate the Scriptures you don't want to apply to you.... divide them out of your life.... shear wickedness.
All scripture is for our learning, but not all scripture is written directly to you.
Jesus said in Matthew 5:17 "Think not that I have come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."
What is Sin? 1 John 3:4 KJV says "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Jesus said in Matthew 5:19 "Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven..."
This man talks deception. There is no wisdom in his words. Learn to rightly divide the word elsewhere. Beware! May his eyes be opened and he repent from his ways.
Brother Albert Israel you religious full I know I'm being a little rude but you don't understand where you're living Matthew Mark Luke and John is for the Jews in the Kingdom message you're not under that message Jesus came to the Jews the messages he preached or for the Jews not for you I am a Jew and when I read what Jesus says it hits me like a bullet but when I read Paul and it hits me like a nuclear bomb how you can be so blind shows just how arrogant you are wake up get out of your religion and actually read the Bible