Merry Christmas! Unlike our previous full episodes, this one has 15 minutes or so of new footage, as we tried to cover three more battles that weren't described in the stand-alone episodes. Consider supporting us on patreon: www.patreon.com/KingsandGenerals
Wow! some Christmas treat! 52`` - Thank You.All the best for You.And congrats -after just a little over 2 years,You r only 23 thousand subscribers left to a 1 000 000.Fantastic job.
"Do I get the same cell--?" "No I'm afraid not this time. You'll be three cells down." "Oh, come on then, that's the one by the raven's nest, they squawk something awful." "Can't be any worse than your wife's squawking, amiright lads!?"
On one hand, it's extremely satisfying seeing how effective Henry V was at gaining land. On the other, it's extremely painful watching his son lose it all.
They probably would have struggled to hold on to that land no matter who became king. Throughout the Hundred Years War the French crown always had more resources/money/manpower to call on. A more capable monarch probably could have held on to it longer though
@@sonnyocad287 i would say no because it represents king Henry as weak and easily control. I would recommend watching shadiverisity he has done a review
That's what happens when your father in law thinks he's made of glass. Just think of how much impact Henry V's marrying Catherine of Valois had. Not just in breeding genes for insanity into Henry VI, but also Edmund Tudor and thence into the tudors and then through Margaret Tudor into the Stuarts and then from the Winter Queen into the Hanoverians and finally Windsor's. How much misery has come from that one decision? Life, huh?
Game of Thrones watchers: "So you're telling me the 3 main areas of this world are named Westeros, Essos, Sothoryos? Lazy naming" The British: "Wessex, Essex, Sussex."
Americans think George Martin is a great writer, Europeans who’ve studied their history just play ‘spot which bit of European history he lifted that bit from!’
@@ffotograffydd Your point was that Americans wouldnt realise that alot of GRRMs work is based on real histotic events where as European Historians would. American Historians would also know about the War of the Roses wouldn't they? If not then what was the point of your comment?
@@earlofbroadst that isn’t the point…even the Brits can’t remember all these dudes with the same name! They have to list their surname so there’s a distinction between the others.
Ever felt unnecessary in your life? Just think about Henry VI, he got coronated, defeated, went into coma, used, captured, freed, reinstated as king, recaptured, dethroned, freed, reinstated, cheated, recaptured on and on. All that happening while he was doing almost nothing(his wife and cousins, brothers doing the most).
@@alancoe1002 Coronated exists in other languages. One example would be Spanish where crown is corona and crowned is coronado. It's as easy as saying loyalista in Spanish instead of lealista, the actual word in Spanish.
@@JonatasAdoM common usage will drag it in like a wet, stray cat eventually, like "conversate", "irregardless", and another dozen or so a year. English is a mongrel, I know, but clarity in communication is hard enough without junk words.
I’ve always found it interesting that in the Middle Ages an army was often in the low thousands, while in ancient time they could swell to the many tens of thousands for even the smaller nations.
@@BatCostumeGuy and add to it, after the roman empire, Europeans were in small countries, each having multiple lords and all of them were apparently at constant war with one another. this and multiple hygiene problems did not leave room for much population growth
Also alot of those battles were written down 50-100-200 years later. It's believed that a lot of the numbers were inflated. They would say we had an army of 80000 and we went against an army of 150,000. So that way it looks like you had a huge Army and your enemy had an even larger Army and you defeated it. Early Muslims were great at this. Also almost any Greek historian writing about the past.
Well, Henry V was named after his father Henry IV, & Henry VI after HIS father Henry V. Henry VI named his sole child Edward, but his ultimate heir was his half-nephew Henry VII, who was named after his half-uncle by his mother. We all know his son Henry VIII was the last 'Henry' to rule England. But Henry IV had been named after his maternal grandfather, Henry of Grosmont (whose own father was named Henry, after his own grandfather Henry III). Henry III was presumably named after his grandfather, Henry II, who was *deliberately* named after HIS grandfather, Henry I, by his mother. Henry I was the baby of the bunch when it came to William the Conqueror's kids, but his mother probably named him after her uncle, Henry I, king of France. Where he got his name, I don't know. There could have been a Henry IX; James I's father was named Henry (the choice of name was deliberate on the part of his mother, who named him after her uncle Henry VIII, in the hopes he would be named in the royal succession); he was considered as a potential heir to Elizabeth b/f his wantonness (& later death) ruled him out. James I in turn named his eldest son Henry, probably after Elizabeth I's father rather than his own, since in those years he was a bit of a suck-up to the English queen. But Henry Stuart died b/f he could be king. The next 'royal' Henry was the brother of Bonnie Prince Charlie, the Cardinal Duke of York (known to his supporters as Henry IX). Ofc. Prince Harry's legal name is "Henry" so if by some freak accident HE becomes king you'd finally have another King Henry after several centuries of the name being 'cursed.'
@@jeandehuit5385 Weren't there kings named Henry in many other countries across the europe? Straight quote from wikipedia: "Equivalents in other languages are Henry (English), Heiki (Estonian), Heikki (Finnish), Henryk (Polish), Hendrik (Dutch), Heinrich (German), Enrico (Italian), Henri (French), Enrique (Spanish) and Henrique (Portuguese)." In OP comment, there was no particular mention of Henry's of England so i first thought he meant generally the etymology of the name and it's meaning.
@@alaric_ There were, but you can be rest assured the meaning of the name was either forgotten by the time monarchs started using it (esp. the English ones) or was considered irrelevant. Medieval European nobility & royalty typically named their children after themselves or members of their immediate family. Failing that, other popular options include mythical vaunted ancestors (such as when Henry VII named his son Arthur), famous saints (such as when Henry III named his eldest son Edward), or for lesser nobility, sometimes they just named their kids after the king or queen. In the generations after Charles VII took back what the English had taken in the 100 years war, plenty of cadet scions of the French royal family start suddenly using the name Charles, even if they hadn't used that name previously. These guys don't name their kids like we do today, they don't look at a baby book, consider the 'meaning' of the name & chose names that they liked. They were still sentimental, ofc. but in a different way. What mattered to them was honoring someone else who had borne the name beforehand. Plenty of names were also barred to them culturally; you don't find many Sarahs, Josephs, or Isaacs in the names of the European nobility, b/c regardless of what those names meant, they were considered too 'Jewish' for a 'good Christian' to use. Horribly anti-Semitic, ofc. The social & cultural value of the name, & whether it was a 'family name' mattered more than what the name itself actually meant literally. If the 'meaning' of the name was actually remembered at the time, b/c for the most part it was forgotten. Henry III probably didn't know Anglo-Saxon, so he didn't know Eadweard meant 'wealth-protector,' but he *did* know it was the name borne by Edward the Confessor, a man he deeply respected & wanted to emulate.
Yes, it is a Frenchiefied German name. Related to the german name Heimrich. A lot of French regal names are Germanic in origin: Charles (Karl in German, also related to the Old English word Churl, meaning peasant!), Richard (Rich + hard 'kingdom' + 'powerful'), Louis (Ludwig in German), Robert (Hro∂r- + berhta 'fame' + 'bright')
The founder of the French royal dynasty the Bourbons was Henry IV -they still rule in Spain today.There were many Holy Roman Emperors called Henry -or rather its German equivalent.Basically it's a French name originally Germanic and adopted by English kings-same as such other English royal names like William,Charles and Richard which are also Frenchified versions of Germanic names.Unfortunately European history has become very Anglo-centric and most people don't realize these things.
George R.R. Martin stated that The War of The Roses was the main influence for The War of The Five Kings, mostly the conflict between The Starks and The Lannisters.
Fun fact about the Nevilles: They were one of the few aristocratic families in England that decended in the male line from an Anglo-Saxon noble (a northern noble called Uhtred).
@@leod-sigefast I don't think the English nobility used surnames before the Norman Conquest. And despite being male descent from an Anglo-Saxon noble, the family had clearly assimilated into Norman society.
Great documentary, K&G! Keep it up, this is so great! Here are some timestamps for the video. Hope it helps! 0:00 Introduction 1:35 Context 4:13 Beginning of tensions 7:20 1st phase 8:55 Battle of St. Albans 11:38 1st phase resumes 12:32 Battle of Wakefield 14:55 Battle of Towton 19:23 Ending of 1st phase 21:14 2nd phase - Beginning 24:33 Battle of Barnet 29:06 Battle of Tewkesbury 32:17 Ending of 2nd phase 36:04 3rd phase - Beginning 38:34 Battle of Bosworth 42:39 Ending of 3rd phase 44:49 Last phase - Beginning 49:09 Battle of Stoke 52:48 Conclusion
''England hath long been mad, and scarr'd herself; The brother blindly shed the brother's blood, The father rashly slaughter'd his own son, The son, compell'd, been butcher to the sire: All this divided York and Lancaster." Shakespeare Richard III
'Fun' fact: More Englishmen died at Towton than died on the first day of the Battle of The Somme in WW1. It was the bloodiest day in all of English history by far.
@@lorenzomenegol6461 how brutal it may be. I rather have my brains bashed in. And a fighting chanse to defend myself before that happens. Then getting mooled down from 200 meters by a mschine gun or blown to hell by artillery that i can not see or react to. today any fat nerd can sitt in front of a computer stearing a drone or missile with a Joystick and take the lifes of brave fighting men on the battle field half a world away. While eating popcorn and zipping on cola zero. Todays warzones between a developed and undeveloped country is pure slaughter. Often without valour. In thoose days even the smallest nations stood a fighting chanse ro defend themselfs if their men were skilled and brave enough
Listening to the third Dunk and Egg story mentions the Butterwell Lord having two sons, one would fight with Targaryen the other with Blackfyre. Sounds familiar doesn’t it?
I love how Edward led the relief for the side attack. Could you imagine how his men would’ve been reverent to him for his guts, because the culture of humanity was still so bloody, a move like that just screams valor.
@@fukkitful to be fair, now we have drones so front line leaders would just get sniped or blown up by a drone. the world has evolved to suit cowards rather than good honorable men.
Richard of York did have the better claim to the English throne as his uncle Edmund Mortimer, 5th Earl of March was the heir presumptive to Richard II and should have been next in line after Richard's abdication. In fact after Richard was deposed, many English and Welsh rebels led by the Percys proclaimed Edmund as their rightful king, although he never took up the crown or pressed his claim and thus was spared and lived to old age. Edmund had no issue so when he died the duchy of York was transferred to his nephew by his sister Anne, Richard because he was his closest male relative.
Yeah, and Henry IV dealt with this superior claim by asserting some flimflam about Edmund Crouchback being the *real* firstborn son of Henry III rather than Edward I. Both Henry IV and Edmund Mortimer were descended from Edward I, but only Henry was descended from Edmund Crouchback (matrilineally). The two Yorkist kings, Edward IV and Richard III, were descended from not only Lionel of Antwerp, Duke of Clarence, elder brother of John of Gaunt (Henry IV's father), but also Edmund of Langley, Duke of York. For good measure, the Yorkists were also descended from John of Gaunt himself via their mother, Cecily Neville, who was the daughter of Gaunt's natural daughter, Joan Beaufort. Three sons of the king were their forefathers.
Henry VI certainly had a better claim to the the crown as the anointed king than Richard of York. If he hadn't had the unfortunate combination of incompetence and metal illness, his claim would have never been seriously questioned. Henry IV seized the crown from a tyrant and did so with the overall support of the nobility and clergy. That makes him the king, no different than Henry II or his son John, both who had questionable claims to the throne based on heredity. The truth of the matter is that a king needs to be able to back his claim by support and not bloodlines. Where was the support for John of Luxembourg during this time? He was descended through Edward III's second born Isabella.
Fun fact about Lambert Simnel, after his capture by Henry VII he was actually taken to Royal Court, were he would serve as a kitchen hand and later a Falconier all the way to 1525. Not the worst fate for a defeated Royal Pretender
They probably recognized a schmuck when they saw one. He was what, a page? I imagine the Tudors saw him as a guy who couldn't say no to nobility (and who apparently was good enough as a kitchen man and falconer) to keep him around. It sounds like Henry was fairly magnanimous so far as the times went.
Well they knew he was just a kid who’d been used, the guy actually behind the plot was sentenced to life imprisonment and only spared execution because he was a priest. Perkin Warbeck met with a very different fate, quite possibly because he was who he said he was. Despite being executed as a common traitor his burial was more befitting a member of the Royal Family. We know where he was buried, and the church still exists, so DNA could prove one way or the other if he was telling the truth. It could also shed light on the Prince in the Tower story.
@@ffotograffyddI doubt he was who he was, if the Yorks had the real prince why would they try to use someone to pretend to be Edward Plantagenet who was cut off from the line of sucession anyway?
Great coverage of the Wars of the Roses. I especially enjoyed the battles, your intro covering the end of the Hundred Years War, and your epilogue covering the final Yorkist rebellion.
I'm a descendant of house Percy, with Guillaum Aux Gernons and Manfred de Percy being my oldest known ancestors. It's very cool to learn how my family had a hand in influencing Game Of Thrones
I keep on watching videos about English history and it never bores me. Seeing it from a militairy angle is very interesting. Usually documentaries focus on other factors, like the princes in the tower or the family politics of the day.
I just want to let you all know that Medieval Kingdom 1212AD Campaign mod is out in Attila TW ! Trust me, it is fun ! As always, here are the Attila mods that we use in this video : -Medieval Kingdom 1212 -GEMFX -Mediator Graphic Enhancement -Aztec Graphics
I don't think I would of found this mod if I didn't read your comment. I only check for DEI for Rome 2, but I could really do with a good medieval TA game. I was pretty close to installing Medieval 2:TW with Stainless Steel.
I'm amazed that you managed to keep me captivated. I usually tune out after names and numbers but the way you had the narrative flow made it all fascinating. Best of all, I found myself actively rooting on during battles, cheering when the Yorkists took the win, then thoroughly enjoying the underdog story of Henry. Great stuff! Thank you for this fantastic documentary!
@@KingsandGenerals Thanks. I'm going to watch your videos when I'm doing the treadmill from now on. When I get my summer beach bod, I can thank your channel for it 😁
Im the same way. The Duke of York probably saw the Lancasters as incompetent after Henry V died and resented his hard work in France being squandered by that incompetence.
The Lancastrians were incompetent and useless,(top useless person was The Duke of Somerset) and Queen Margaret was determined to make an enemy of the Duke of York and persecute him. York was pushed into a corner and also thought he could do better. The Lancastrians had also been usurpers in their time so that set a precedent..
From what I saw, Yorkists were very lucky on multiple occasions. The weather seemed to really favour them in a couple of decisive battles. Imagine taking a hill and still losing because of the wind. If I were Henry I would’ve been very butthurt from all those losses.
@@Dippitydee You may be right. I don't know. I was referring to the Lancastrians being incompetent in how they ruled the country rather than in battle.
Helen Trope I see what you mean. Seems that the Queen Margaret was making all the shots while Henry seems kinda useless. Although I have no expertise on this conflict other than watching this video :D
You are probably my favorite history channel on TH-cam followed closely by Mr. Terry History. There are a lot of good channels but you guys are just a step above the rest. Thank you for all the great videos. I know it takes a lot of work. I think I speak for everyone when I say we appreciate it.
Thank you for this wonderful presentation! It is such a confusing time and it is difficult to keep track of all the names and places, you did a really good job K&G of explaining and showing it in a way that is easy to understand.
thats what bastard feudalism does. Joffrey actually was progressive when he said that a centralized army loyal only to the king should have been created.
The fact that everyone was named Henry, Edward, and Charles really doesn't help to keep track of who's who. Especially when they change names upon seizing London
"Simnel was captured and surprisingly spread" Well Lambert Simnel who was the son of a tanner was just 10 years old, that was not explained in the video. King Henry was no fool, he knew that the rebels were using this child for their own gains and that Simnel was being manipulated by the rebels. What would be the point of executing him? Instead the boy was assigned to the kitchen as a spit turner in the palace, he later became a falconer and died somewhere aged between 50 to 60, the date of his death is not known for sure, but his age at the time of the rebellion is well documented. However the story of Lambrt Simnel clearly shows that mercy was not unknown even in the middle ages.
In the end, the Yorkists didn't really lose. The Lancastrians based their claim to the throne on agnatic primogeniture; that is, inheritance passes only through the male line. Henry Bolingbroke claimed the crown through John of Gaunt, the fourth child of Edward III. The Yorkists claimed the crown through cognatic primogeniture; that is, inheritance passes down through the eldest issue regardless of sex. Richard of York claimed the crown through Lionel Duke of Clarence, the third child of Edward III, via his only daughter, Phillippa, Countess of Ulster. So the Yorkist claim depended upon inheritance passing through a woman. Although this principle was at the root of the Hundred Years' War (Henry V contested Salic Law (agnatic primogeniture) in staking his own claim to France - which would technically have invalidated his claim to the throne of England had Edmund Mortimer, 5th Earl of March, made a claim). The Tudors eventually cemented cognatic primogeniture as the law of the land, allowing women to take the throne for the first time. This resulted in the reign of Elizabeth I, the first female English monarch. So although the Yorkists were defeated in battle, the law that gave them claim to the crown became established, and stands as the law of succession in England to this day.
I mean Yorkshire didn’t lose in the sense that it wasn’t a war between Yorkshire and Lancashire, it was a war between cousins who just happened to have been given various titles tied to counties in England. I grew up in Yorkshire and never understood the way people from there - many of my family included - view the War of the Roses. Centuries of propaganda has turned it into something it wasn’t.
This video is just amazing. Usually when told about this period there's always a biased telling behind it. It usually is a underdog fight or one side is always crushing the other. This video shows it is so much more, with all the nuances and whatnot.
I assume you refer to Margaret Beaufort? She didn't so much tell Henry VII what to do so much as he was able to rely on her for advice. This was a period in time many senior 'traditional' figures in government were dead; Lancastrian loyalists, Yorkist loyalists, a lot of them were dead. Henry VII relied on new men to run his government, & as a rule he couldn't always trust them. One of his spies told him he heard nobles talking about who would make a good king, & none of them mentioned Prince Arthur... Although she was barely a generation older than Henry was (she had him at age 13), Henry deliberately sought out her advice b/c she'd witnessed English court intrigue & had experience in estate management (both of which he had little direct experience with). Since he was her only child (& she his sole remaining parent) he could trust her advice implicitly, which was something he needed when there was always a hint of doubt when it came to the loyalties of his other advisors.
When mommy can gather a similar number of soldiers and supporters, you better believe she can tell you what to do and she is also an aristocrat with her own ties to another territory which would gladly come to her aid.
Through 'Ancestry' and 'Find My Past' I found out that I am related, albeit distantly to the Percy family, so since then the 'Wars Of The Roses' and indeed the Tudor period have become like magic to me!!
As a finnish i have to disagree :/ I find those names very distinct from each other. And for me, indian names are more easily recognizable than chinese. It seems that many times chinese names are 3-4 letter long each, with 2-3 names and most of the time there seems to be only one letter difference between those names. That said, i have to confess that i haven't played the Three Kingdoms game :D Maybe some day :)
@@alaric_ I dont plau 3 kingdoms. The names writen in Chinese charaters are easy for us can read instead of using roman spelling always pronounced the same without tones
@@alaric_ yeah Indian names are super simple 👍🏾. My name is Abhigyan and one of my freind's name is Kshitiz (pronounced Chhitij) and another is Hrishank (pronounced Rishank). Damn Roman characters are needlessly complex
War/s of the Roses was a later appellation. At the time these battles, which affected the nobility more than it did the peasant commonry, was named The Cousins' War.
I cannot say it enough: This channel is fabulously and fantastically AWESOME! This should be played in schools when teaching students about periods of world history! Bravissimo!
Merry Christmas! I noticed y’all are close to 1,000,000 subscribers!! That’s really awesome and I hope y’all get it soon. This channel has been my favorite for historical content this year. Thank you for all the awesome videos!
15:06 - - When England was fighting with a foreign enemy, France, the whole English army was 10,000...15,000 in important battles. But when they were fighting between themselves, in internal conflict, one side musters 30,000, while the other 35,000 soldiers! Both sides combined, 65,000 in total.
From the 1600s onwards, Britain became almost immune from invasion. Their navy was becoming one of the largest in the world, and being an island with a big navy really helps protect you.
@teslagod2003 Well said. The empire itself didn’t have an emperor as head of state, but not wanting to be considered inferior to the other European emperors, Queen Victoria made herself the Empress of India, so that she had the same authority as the other Great Powers’ leaders.
Always wondered what went on during this war. And wow this channel has delivered on that. Great job to whoever made this video a reality. You people made my day.
13:44 Richard Of York Gave Battle In Vain - ROYGBIV a handy memory aid for the colours of the rainbow. I think only people from England will have heard that one.
I'll be honest, if you were my teacher going over this in school I would have paid WAY more attention. You have a knack sir for making history interesting. Not a common gift. Thanks for the great videos 👍👍👍
@@stephendise7946 the Anarchy not so much as many of the solders where Foreign mercenaries often Fleming's and Burgundian and in the chronicles of the time you see these forgings often cast as murderous and rapacious additionally there where also 2 Scottish invasions in 1136 and 1138 and unlike the Scottish invasion in the 1640s the the Scots king was a separate person to the English
there was civil wars going on in britain since before the Romans got here. Its the only way Rome could of got in to britian as the celtic army was far better trained and equiped than the Romans were. A roman army of 100k under the command of britanicus was totaly destroyed by 40k Celts. Only 10 Romans were left alive. britian was renamed from the celtic name Albion to Britania by Julius Ceaser in honour of his best general. same thing happened on the 2nd attemp by the romans to invade britian. 3rd attempt succeded cause the Romans manged to get celtic tribes fighting each other to weaken them 1st.
Yes, & the trend would continue until either William III or George I (depending on if you want to count William III's co-monarch Mary II who did speak English as a first language). Henry VII probably1st learned to speak English as a child growing up in the Welsh marches, but later learned Breton & French while in exile on the continent, so he spoke English fluently but with an accent due to being away from home for so long. As an aside, Henry IV's father John of Gaunt was actually Geoffrey Chaucer's chief patron & financial backer, so it would be a LITTLE odd if his son didn't make a little use of all that beautifully-crafted English. Gaunt's mistress & 3rd wife Katherine Swynford (née Roet) was also the sister of Chaucer's wife Philippa Roet. Swynford's family came with Edward III's wife from the Low Countries when she came to England; Philippa Roet married Chaucer, Chaucer got employed by Gaunt, & so Philippa's sister Katherine became nanny for Gaunt's children. Later Katherine became MORE than just a nanny, & had 4 children w/ Gaunt who where legitimated upon their marriage. Henry VII's claim to the throne came from this marriage. So if it weren't for Chaucer the ultimate Lancastrian heir might never have been born!
The video nicely details the causes and events of the Cousin's War. However, a crucial link not displayed in the family trees at 6:56 and 34:12 is that of Richard of York's full parentage. Although they depict Richard's descent from Edmund of Langley through Richard of Conisburgh, his mother was Anne de Mortimer, daughter of Roger Mortimer (4th Earl of March) and Roger's mother was Philippa (5th Countess of Ulster), daughter to Lionel of Antwerp. This descent from an older son (to Gaunt) of Edward III was Richard's strongest argument for York's ascendancy.
Finally a comprehensive yet precise clear documentary about this period of British history that an Indian could understand, though with many rewinds. Loved it.
English,Welch,Duch and French Huguenot here. I was born in Lisbon Ohio I'm American and I am greatly interested in things like this. History rules keep up the great work. Maybe we can one day have a video about the French Huguenots coming to England.
Edward to Sommerset and the Yorkists: It's over Sommerset! I have the High Ground! (btw "Sommerset and the Yorkists" sounds like a good Rock Band Name)
My 13th Great Grandfather, William Bawden was born in Penryn Cornwall during the last 10 years of the War, and died a few years before Henry the 8ths reign ended. Dude lived through MONUMENTAL Changes.
Fun fact about the Nevilles and Percys: they both stayed Catholic after the English reformation, which meant that in 1569 they put aside their differences and teamed up to rebel against the Protestant Elizabeth I (Henry Tudor's granddaughter). They were totally crushed.
Merry Christmas! Unlike our previous full episodes, this one has 15 minutes or so of new footage, as we tried to cover three more battles that weren't described in the stand-alone episodes. Consider supporting us on patreon: www.patreon.com/KingsandGenerals
Was the extra content the deleted scenes?
Nope. Just the stuff we didn't go too deep before.
More content is always welcomed
Wow! some Christmas treat! 52`` - Thank You.All the best for You.And congrats -after just a little over 2 years,You r only 23 thousand subscribers left to a 1 000 000.Fantastic job.
Wow - this is great. Hopefully 1 million subscribers before 2020 :-)
25:00 "Then captured Henry VI yet again"
Edward IV" I am assuming you know where the tower London is" ?
Henry VI "Yes I know, I will see myself out"
He probadly knew all the guards by name, including their wifes, sons and daughters: "Oh, hey Henry back again? Who got you this time?" :D
@@ratatan7720 Everyone caught him at some point.
He's the only person who syphilis caught, it's usually the other way around.
is that dialogue a reference? because it seems like one
"Do I get the same cell--?"
"No I'm afraid not this time. You'll be three cells down."
"Oh, come on then, that's the one by the raven's nest, they squawk something awful."
"Can't be any worse than your wife's squawking, amiright lads!?"
*24:58
On one hand, it's extremely satisfying seeing how effective Henry V was at gaining land. On the other, it's extremely painful watching his son lose it all.
They probably would have struggled to hold on to that land no matter who became king. Throughout the Hundred Years War the French crown always had more resources/money/manpower to call on. A more capable monarch probably could have held on to it longer though
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 Yep. When looking at the territorial changes throughout the war, the English never held onto their gains for very long.
@@tylerghersinich576 I haven't, but I am aware of it. Is it worth seeing?
@@sonnyocad287 i would say no because it represents king Henry as weak and easily control. I would recommend watching shadiverisity he has done a review
That's what happens when your father in law thinks he's made of glass. Just think of how much impact Henry V's marrying Catherine of Valois had. Not just in breeding genes for insanity into Henry VI, but also Edmund Tudor and thence into the tudors and then through Margaret Tudor into the Stuarts and then from the Winter Queen into the Hanoverians and finally Windsor's. How much misery has come from that one decision? Life, huh?
Game of Thrones watchers:
"So you're telling me the 3 main areas of this world are named Westeros, Essos, Sothoryos? Lazy naming"
The British:
"Wessex, Essex, Sussex."
What did you expect? We named our planet - Earth.
Americans think George Martin is a great writer, Europeans who’ve studied their history just play ‘spot which bit of European history he lifted that bit from!’
Europeans who've studied history also think GRRM is a great writer and also comparing every day Americans to European Historians is idiotic.
@@marcmason3514 Oh dear! You’ve completed missed the point I was making. 😂😂😂
@@ffotograffydd Your point was that Americans wouldnt realise that alot of GRRMs work is based on real histotic events where as European Historians would.
American Historians would also know about the War of the Roses wouldn't they?
If not then what was the point of your comment?
Every single guy in this conflict was either named Henry, Richard or Edward
They're family names, after all.
Sums up English history
@@earlofbroadst ik it's just harder to keep up with what's going on and who's who lol
This is why I can’t keep track of these guys. It is seriously messing with my memory. I can’t remember, myself, what they started out with (almost)!
@@earlofbroadst that isn’t the point…even the Brits can’t remember all these dudes with the same name! They have to list their surname so there’s a distinction between the others.
Ever felt unnecessary in your life?
Just think about Henry VI, he got coronated, defeated, went into coma, used, captured, freed, reinstated as king, recaptured, dethroned, freed, reinstated, cheated, recaptured on and on. All that happening while he was doing almost nothing(his wife and cousins, brothers doing the most).
Come on, now, it's unfair to call Henry VI unnecessary. I heard that he was extremely competent at keeping the Tower of London's seats warm.
"coronated"? Dear God, what a word!
Crowned. No such word as 'coronated'. It's a shit word, like 'hella'. Just flush it and jiggle the handle so it all goes down.
@@alancoe1002 Coronated exists in other languages.
One example would be Spanish where crown is corona and crowned is coronado.
It's as easy as saying loyalista in Spanish instead of lealista, the actual word in Spanish.
@@JonatasAdoM common usage will drag it in like a wet, stray cat eventually, like "conversate", "irregardless", and another dozen or so a year. English is a mongrel, I know, but clarity in communication is hard enough without junk words.
Last time I was this early, Henry VI was still not captured.
You probably caught the moment between two captivities
I usually hate on "early" comments but this one was sufficiently dry enough to make me laugh.
This was one of the craziest conflicts in world history.
Yes, it's very complex with all the shifting alliances.
Three Kingdoms: "i don't think so lad"
@@ariavachier-lagravech.6910 "One of the" not "the", but ok.
Agreed with this many causalities, how thier still figthing.
Can see why it was the inspiration behind Game of Thrones.
Drinking challenge: take a shot every time Henry VI gets captured or when the Lancastrians get clapped by the Yorkists
You're out here trying to give people alcohol poisoning, mate. Lmao.
In the words of Stevie Wonder - " Don't Drive Drunk ".
bolstering your yorkist failure, what a surprise.
Ah, here we are' 600 years later, re-fighting a civil war. Most refreshing !
No, take a shot every time there was a rebellion during the war.
I’ve always found it interesting that in the Middle Ages an army was often in the low thousands, while in ancient time they could swell to the many tens of thousands for even the smaller nations.
That's becuase the bubonic plague killed millions in the medieval ages.
@@BatCostumeGuy and add to it, after the roman empire, Europeans were in small countries, each having multiple lords and all of them were apparently at constant war with one another. this and multiple hygiene problems did not leave room for much population growth
@@triplem5770 Yes, good point lad! The Romans usually handled plauge and hygiene problems pretty well.
Also alot of those battles were written down 50-100-200 years later. It's believed that a lot of the numbers were inflated. They would say we had an army of 80000 and we went against an army of 150,000. So that way it looks like you had a huge Army and your enemy had an even larger Army and you defeated it. Early Muslims were great at this. Also almost any Greek historian writing about the past.
@@BatCostumeGuy that was until the church decided that bathing was a sin
I've finally found out why there was so many king Henry's. The name Henry literally means "ruler of the home."
Well, Henry V was named after his father Henry IV, & Henry VI after HIS father Henry V.
Henry VI named his sole child Edward, but his ultimate heir was his half-nephew Henry VII, who was named after his half-uncle by his mother. We all know his son Henry VIII was the last 'Henry' to rule England.
But Henry IV had been named after his maternal grandfather, Henry of Grosmont (whose own father was named Henry, after his own grandfather Henry III). Henry III was presumably named after his grandfather, Henry II, who was *deliberately* named after HIS grandfather, Henry I, by his mother.
Henry I was the baby of the bunch when it came to William the Conqueror's kids, but his mother probably named him after her uncle, Henry I, king of France. Where he got his name, I don't know.
There could have been a Henry IX; James I's father was named Henry (the choice of name was deliberate on the part of his mother, who named him after her uncle Henry VIII, in the hopes he would be named in the royal succession); he was considered as a potential heir to Elizabeth b/f his wantonness (& later death) ruled him out.
James I in turn named his eldest son Henry, probably after Elizabeth I's father rather than his own, since in those years he was a bit of a suck-up to the English queen. But Henry Stuart died b/f he could be king. The next 'royal' Henry was the brother of Bonnie Prince Charlie, the Cardinal Duke of York (known to his supporters as Henry IX).
Ofc. Prince Harry's legal name is "Henry" so if by some freak accident HE becomes king you'd finally have another King Henry after several centuries of the name being 'cursed.'
@@jeandehuit5385 Weren't there kings named Henry in many other countries across the europe? Straight quote from wikipedia: "Equivalents in other languages are Henry (English), Heiki (Estonian), Heikki (Finnish), Henryk (Polish), Hendrik (Dutch), Heinrich (German), Enrico (Italian), Henri (French), Enrique (Spanish) and Henrique (Portuguese)."
In OP comment, there was no particular mention of Henry's of England so i first thought he meant generally the etymology of the name and it's meaning.
@@alaric_ There were, but you can be rest assured the meaning of the name was either forgotten by the time monarchs started using it (esp. the English ones) or was considered irrelevant. Medieval European nobility & royalty typically named their children after themselves or members of their immediate family.
Failing that, other popular options include mythical vaunted ancestors (such as when Henry VII named his son Arthur), famous saints (such as when Henry III named his eldest son Edward), or for lesser nobility, sometimes they just named their kids after the king or queen. In the generations after Charles VII took back what the English had taken in the 100 years war, plenty of cadet scions of the French royal family start suddenly using the name Charles, even if they hadn't used that name previously.
These guys don't name their kids like we do today, they don't look at a baby book, consider the 'meaning' of the name & chose names that they liked. They were still sentimental, ofc. but in a different way. What mattered to them was honoring someone else who had borne the name beforehand. Plenty of names were also barred to them culturally; you don't find many Sarahs, Josephs, or Isaacs in the names of the European nobility, b/c regardless of what those names meant, they were considered too 'Jewish' for a 'good Christian' to use. Horribly anti-Semitic, ofc.
The social & cultural value of the name, & whether it was a 'family name' mattered more than what the name itself actually meant literally. If the 'meaning' of the name was actually remembered at the time, b/c for the most part it was forgotten. Henry III probably didn't know Anglo-Saxon, so he didn't know Eadweard meant 'wealth-protector,' but he *did* know it was the name borne by Edward the Confessor, a man he deeply respected & wanted to emulate.
Yes, it is a Frenchiefied German name. Related to the german name Heimrich. A lot of French regal names are Germanic in origin: Charles (Karl in German, also related to the Old English word Churl, meaning peasant!), Richard (Rich + hard 'kingdom' + 'powerful'), Louis (Ludwig in German), Robert (Hro∂r- + berhta 'fame' + 'bright')
The founder of the French royal dynasty the Bourbons was Henry IV -they still rule in Spain today.There were many Holy Roman Emperors called Henry -or rather its German equivalent.Basically it's a French name originally Germanic and adopted by English kings-same as such other English royal names like William,Charles and Richard which are also Frenchified versions of Germanic names.Unfortunately European history has become very Anglo-centric and most people don't realize these things.
Was there a single man, woman, or child in England who DIDN'T capture King Henry VI?
I captured Henry VI and so did my wife
Maybe Henry VI himself?
My wife's boyfriend captured him and both my dad's.
@@knockitoffhudson3470 Quite the progressive family structure.
Yes, Bob.
"A Lancaster always pay his debts!"
Thank you for the gift, and Merry Christmas for the K&G team!
George R.R. Martin stated that The War of The Roses was the main influence for The War of The Five Kings, mostly the conflict between The Starks and The Lannisters.
@@gfilmer7150 he didnt ask for a history lesson. He was just reffering and qouting
@@JuniorJuni070 True
We actually don’t though
@@JuniorJuni070 this is a history channel what do you expect?
Fun fact about the Nevilles: They were one of the few aristocratic families in England that decended in the male line from an Anglo-Saxon noble (a northern noble called Uhtred).
Uhtred of bebbanburg?
Cool. Glad there was still some Anglo-Saxon nobility left. But why the French/Norman name, Neville?
@@leod-sigefast Not enough nobility, I guess.
@@leod-sigefast I don't think the English nobility used surnames before the Norman Conquest. And despite being male descent from an Anglo-Saxon noble, the family had clearly assimilated into Norman society.
@@notmyname9625 The daneslayer !
Great documentary, K&G! Keep it up, this is so great!
Here are some timestamps for the video. Hope it helps!
0:00 Introduction
1:35 Context
4:13 Beginning of tensions
7:20 1st phase
8:55 Battle of St. Albans
11:38 1st phase resumes
12:32 Battle of Wakefield
14:55 Battle of Towton
19:23 Ending of 1st phase
21:14 2nd phase - Beginning
24:33 Battle of Barnet
29:06 Battle of Tewkesbury
32:17 Ending of 2nd phase
36:04 3rd phase - Beginning
38:34 Battle of Bosworth
42:39 Ending of 3rd phase
44:49 Last phase - Beginning
49:09 Battle of Stoke
52:48 Conclusion
Y
''England hath long been mad, and scarr'd herself;
The brother blindly shed the brother's blood,
The father rashly slaughter'd his own son,
The son, compell'd, been butcher to the sire:
All this divided York and Lancaster."
Shakespeare Richard III
'Fun' fact: More Englishmen died at Towton than died on the first day of the Battle of The Somme in WW1. It was the bloodiest day in all of English history by far.
I mean, it was a civil war after all lol
And they were killed with medieval weapons, mostly hand to hand, getting their heads bashed in instead of being mowed down by machine guns.
@@absoleet trooo
@@lorenzomenegol6461 how brutal it may be. I rather have my brains bashed in. And a fighting chanse to defend myself before that happens. Then getting mooled down from 200 meters by a mschine gun or blown to hell by artillery that i can not see or react to. today any fat nerd can sitt in front of a computer stearing a drone or missile with a
Joystick and take the lifes of brave fighting men on the battle field half a world away. While eating popcorn and zipping on cola zero. Todays warzones between a developed and undeveloped country is pure slaughter. Often without valour. In thoose days even the smallest nations stood a fighting chanse ro defend themselfs if their men were skilled and brave enough
Maybe not. Latest research suggest that the largest batle in the WOTR numericallyn was "nd St Albans, not Towton.
Lancasters: It's over, York, I have the high ground!
York: You underestimate my pOWer! God and the Wind are at my side!
In my perspective, the Yorks have won! We married into the Tudors”
Don't try it!
@@dgrmn12345 The Tudors are Evil!
benvolio mozart you have no life
The real life game of thrones... about damn time.
Kings and Generals had to recover from season 8.
But with guns and cannons instead of white walkers and magic.
@@cnlbenmc no guns and cannons at this point in time lad.
+@@JohnMacbeth+ Oh they had them, they were just incredibly primitive (matchlocks at best) and available in small numbers.
Listening to the third Dunk and Egg story mentions the Butterwell Lord having two sons, one would fight with Targaryen the other with Blackfyre. Sounds familiar doesn’t it?
I love how Edward led the relief for the side attack. Could you imagine how his men would’ve been reverent to him for his guts, because the culture of humanity was still so bloody, a move like that just screams valor.
Now the person in charge is 1000+ miles away...
@@fukkitful to be fair, now we have drones so front line leaders would just get sniped or blown up by a drone.
the world has evolved to suit cowards rather than good honorable men.
@Resentfuldragon except Idriss Deby, the president of Chad, who was killed while leading troops on the front line at 68 years old. Dude had balls.
War Of Roses: York Vs Lancaster
Winner: *Tudors*
53 minutes? Thank you for this Christmas gift! 🙌🙌
Ikr! I'm Jewish myself, therefore this is the best Christmas of recent memory lol haha, Good Tidings to all!
Happy Hanukkah!
@@KingsandGenerals have you done a video about the Maccabees/The Hyrcanus dynasty?
Richard of York did have the better claim to the English throne as his uncle Edmund Mortimer, 5th Earl of March was the heir presumptive to Richard II and should have been next in line after Richard's abdication. In fact after Richard was deposed, many English and Welsh rebels led by the Percys proclaimed Edmund as their rightful king, although he never took up the crown or pressed his claim and thus was spared and lived to old age. Edmund had no issue so when he died the duchy of York was transferred to his nephew by his sister Anne, Richard because he was his closest male relative.
Ah.. the antics of Richard and Mortimer never fail to amuse me
Yeah, and Henry IV dealt with this superior claim by asserting some flimflam about Edmund Crouchback being the *real* firstborn son of Henry III rather than Edward I. Both Henry IV and Edmund Mortimer were descended from Edward I, but only Henry was descended from Edmund Crouchback (matrilineally). The two Yorkist kings, Edward IV and Richard III, were descended from not only Lionel of Antwerp, Duke of Clarence, elder brother of John of Gaunt (Henry IV's father), but also Edmund of Langley, Duke of York. For good measure, the Yorkists were also descended from John of Gaunt himself via their mother, Cecily Neville, who was the daughter of Gaunt's natural daughter, Joan Beaufort. Three sons of the king were their forefathers.
Henry VI certainly had a better claim to the the crown as the anointed king than Richard of York. If he hadn't had the unfortunate combination of incompetence and metal illness, his claim would have never been seriously questioned. Henry IV seized the crown from a tyrant and did so with the overall support of the nobility and clergy. That makes him the king, no different than Henry II or his son John, both who had questionable claims to the throne based on heredity. The truth of the matter is that a king needs to be able to back his claim by support and not bloodlines. Where was the support for John of Luxembourg during this time? He was descended through Edward III's second born Isabella.
@@ezchoice28 Interesting aside - Henry IV was the first King of England since the Norman conquest whose mother tongue was English rather than French.
@@giovanniacuto2688 really ? i thought he was pretty well french like most royals...i thought his son henry v spoke english well, but french was first
Fun fact about Lambert Simnel, after his capture by Henry VII he was actually taken to Royal Court, were he would serve as a kitchen hand and later a Falconier all the way to 1525. Not the worst fate for a defeated Royal Pretender
Especially when you compare him to Perkin Warbeck, who got himself executed
They probably recognized a schmuck when they saw one. He was what, a page? I imagine the Tudors saw him as a guy who couldn't say no to nobility (and who apparently was good enough as a kitchen man and falconer) to keep him around. It sounds like Henry was fairly magnanimous so far as the times went.
Well they knew he was just a kid who’d been used, the guy actually behind the plot was sentenced to life imprisonment and only spared execution because he was a priest.
Perkin Warbeck met with a very different fate, quite possibly because he was who he said he was. Despite being executed as a common traitor his burial was more befitting a member of the Royal Family. We know where he was buried, and the church still exists, so DNA could prove one way or the other if he was telling the truth. It could also shed light on the Prince in the Tower story.
@@ffotograffyddI doubt he was who he was, if the Yorks had the real prince why would they try to use someone to pretend to be Edward Plantagenet who was cut off from the line of sucession anyway?
@@masterplokoon8803 I think you misunderstood my point.
Very impressive. I've never seen such a comprehensive geo-historical description of this war.
Great coverage of the Wars of the Roses. I especially enjoyed the battles, your intro covering the end of the Hundred Years War, and your epilogue covering the final Yorkist rebellion.
Merry Christmas to everyone watching this video
Merry christmas to you too
Merry Christmas!
Just Some Guy without a Mustache Merry saturnalia!
Like wise
MERRY CHRISTMAS to you my friend
Highly recommend the old board game Kingmaker for anyone who likes this period. One of the greatest boardgames of all time!
I remember playing that game as well as board games about this period created by Avalon Hill.
Yes I second that
As a fan of strategic/tactical plays of the past, I salute you !
Great old game!
my favourite was 'escape from colditz'
Having played plenty of Crusader Kings 2 I can see our guy Edward the thirds mistake right off the bat
ikr, making your brothers the Dukes of the kingdom is a guarantee for civil war lol!
@@AlphaSections it's amazing how much the game teaches you
@@JayzsMr agreed I mean we all know to marry relatives to keep the blood line pure
Edward's first mistake was not converting to Zoroastrianism so he could marry his sister
It all would have been fine if he had switched to elective monarchy
I'm a descendant of house Percy, with Guillaum Aux Gernons and Manfred de Percy being my oldest known ancestors. It's very cool to learn how my family had a hand in influencing Game Of Thrones
I keep on watching videos about English history and it never bores me. Seeing it from a militairy angle is very interesting. Usually documentaries focus on other factors, like the princes in the tower or the family politics of the day.
I just want to let you all know that Medieval Kingdom 1212AD Campaign mod is out in Attila TW ! Trust me, it is fun !
As always, here are the Attila mods that we use in this video :
-Medieval Kingdom 1212
-GEMFX
-Mediator Graphic Enhancement
-Aztec Graphics
I know dont worry :P
I've been playing the campaign for it ever since it got released and I can say that its definitely fun, though there are some bugs.
Aren't many of the troop types still unavailable due to the tech tree being unfinished?
Looks damn good, though. Despite not having that finished.
I don't think I would of found this mod if I didn't read your comment. I only check for DEI for Rome 2, but I could really do with a good medieval TA game. I was pretty close to installing Medieval 2:TW with Stainless Steel.
OH SHIT MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ME
God How I love this channel...
@@KingsandGenerals Is that a ball sacc?
Edward III must be rolling in his grave seeing his descendants fighting amongst themselves.
I'm amazed that you managed to keep me captivated. I usually tune out after names and numbers but the way you had the narrative flow made it all fascinating. Best of all, I found myself actively rooting on during battles, cheering when the Yorkists took the win, then thoroughly enjoying the underdog story of Henry. Great stuff! Thank you for this fantastic documentary!
Thanks!
My torturous hour on the treadmill felt like 10 mins while I watched this.
Thank you and a merry Christmas to you !!
Merry Christmas! All the gains in 2020!
@@KingsandGenerals Thanks. I'm going to watch your videos when I'm doing the treadmill from now on.
When I get my summer beach bod, I can thank your channel for it
😁
@@scotttracy9333 that plan did not age well
Why do I always root for the yorkists even though I know they lose
Im the same way. The Duke of York probably saw the Lancasters as incompetent after Henry V died and resented his hard work in France being squandered by that incompetence.
The Lancastrians were incompetent and useless,(top useless person was The Duke of Somerset) and Queen Margaret was determined to make an enemy of the Duke of York and persecute him. York was pushed into a corner and also thought he could do better. The Lancastrians had also been usurpers in their time so that set a precedent..
From what I saw, Yorkists were very lucky on multiple occasions. The weather seemed to really favour them in a couple of decisive battles. Imagine taking a hill and still losing because of the wind. If I were Henry I would’ve been very butthurt from all those losses.
@@Dippitydee You may be right. I don't know. I was referring to the Lancastrians being incompetent in how they ruled the country rather than in battle.
Helen Trope I see what you mean. Seems that the Queen Margaret was making all the shots while Henry seems kinda useless. Although I have no expertise on this conflict other than watching this video :D
Superb programming guys ❤👍
yep, great stuff!
You are probably my favorite history channel on TH-cam followed closely by Mr. Terry History. There are a lot of good channels but you guys are just a step above the rest. Thank you for all the great videos. I know it takes a lot of work. I think I speak for everyone when I say we appreciate it.
Thank you for this wonderful presentation! It is such a confusing time and it is difficult to keep track of all the names and places, you did a really good job K&G of explaining and showing it in a way that is easy to understand.
Was anyone else like 10 minutes in when you realized you were just watching an overview of game of thrones
thats what bastard feudalism does. Joffrey actually was progressive when he said that a centralized army loyal only to the king should have been created.
The fact that everyone was named Henry, Edward, and Charles really doesn't help to keep track of who's who. Especially when they change names upon seizing London
Merry Christmas! Thanks for the Christmas present!
This must be the best visual explanation of the war of the roses, ever
"Simnel was captured and surprisingly spread" Well Lambert Simnel who was the son of a tanner was just 10 years old, that was not explained in the video. King Henry was no fool, he knew that the rebels were using this child for their own gains and that Simnel was being manipulated by the rebels. What would be the point of executing him? Instead the boy was assigned to the kitchen as a spit turner in the palace, he later became a falconer and died somewhere aged between 50 to 60, the date of his death is not known for sure, but his age at the time of the rebellion is well documented. However the story of Lambrt Simnel clearly shows that mercy was not unknown even in the middle ages.
Alan Moore Perkin warbeck tho really might have been legitimate
@@fredbarker9201 He was probably the bastard of Edward IV
When you will eat breakfast and wondered what to watch while eating, then K&G release a 53 minute video
İ hated it in eu4
me too, the worst part is that the options for a new king are always 2/1/2 4/1/1
I just held the event until I shipped my army over and pubstomped on the Yorkists
after Rule the Seas update England became rather easy to play
@@dereklord7176 just look rebellion maybe they support better king then 2-1-2 or 4-1-1
Easy, dont play England
It's been so long since you guys did another Game of Thrones video. Truly a Christmas gift!
house lancaster always pays their debts
As a Yorkshireman this still hurts to see my county lose.
It didn't lose entirely. There was a lot of Edward IV's personality in Henry VIII. Edward after all was his grandfather
@@giovanniacuto2688 Also Yorkists were based on London while Lancastrians were based in York.
@@jaredgarbo3679the city of York was Lancastrian but The county of Yorkshire was a mix of Yorkists and Lancastrians
In the end, the Yorkists didn't really lose. The Lancastrians based their claim to the throne on agnatic primogeniture; that is, inheritance passes only through the male line. Henry Bolingbroke claimed the crown through John of Gaunt, the fourth child of Edward III. The Yorkists claimed the crown through cognatic primogeniture; that is, inheritance passes down through the eldest issue regardless of sex. Richard of York claimed the crown through Lionel Duke of Clarence, the third child of Edward III, via his only daughter, Phillippa, Countess of Ulster.
So the Yorkist claim depended upon inheritance passing through a woman. Although this principle was at the root of the Hundred Years' War (Henry V contested Salic Law (agnatic primogeniture) in staking his own claim to France - which would technically have invalidated his claim to the throne of England had Edmund Mortimer, 5th Earl of March, made a claim). The Tudors eventually cemented cognatic primogeniture as the law of the land, allowing women to take the throne for the first time. This resulted in the reign of Elizabeth I, the first female English monarch.
So although the Yorkists were defeated in battle, the law that gave them claim to the crown became established, and stands as the law of succession in England to this day.
I mean Yorkshire didn’t lose in the sense that it wasn’t a war between Yorkshire and Lancashire, it was a war between cousins who just happened to have been given various titles tied to counties in England. I grew up in Yorkshire and never understood the way people from there - many of my family included - view the War of the Roses. Centuries of propaganda has turned it into something it wasn’t.
This video is just amazing.
Usually when told about this period there's always a biased telling behind it. It usually is a underdog fight or one side is always crushing the other.
This video shows it is so much more, with all the nuances and whatnot.
when you are the king of England but your mom still tells you what to do
I assume you refer to Margaret Beaufort?
She didn't so much tell Henry VII what to do so much as he was able to rely on her for advice.
This was a period in time many senior 'traditional' figures in government were dead; Lancastrian loyalists, Yorkist loyalists, a lot of them were dead. Henry VII relied on new men to run his government, & as a rule he couldn't always trust them. One of his spies told him he heard nobles talking about who would make a good king, & none of them mentioned Prince Arthur...
Although she was barely a generation older than Henry was (she had him at age 13), Henry deliberately sought out her advice b/c she'd witnessed English court intrigue & had experience in estate management (both of which he had little direct experience with). Since he was her only child (& she his sole remaining parent) he could trust her advice implicitly, which was something he needed when there was always a hint of doubt when it came to the loyalties of his other advisors.
@@jeandehuit5385 Why don't you just let him make a joke? .-.
@@bayonetta857 I like jokes. Did someone tell a joke?
When mommy can gather a similar number of soldiers and supporters, you better believe she can tell you what to do and she is also an aristocrat with her own ties to another territory which would gladly come to her aid.
Couple videos ago: “if we mentioned every detail, the video would be an hour long”
Couple videos later: time to go an hour long.
Through 'Ancestry' and 'Find My Past' I found out that I am related, albeit distantly to the Percy family, so since then the 'Wars Of The Roses' and indeed the Tudor period have become like magic to me!!
Thank you for this video, I actually understand what was happening in the Wars of the Roses now
Glad to hear that!
As a Chinese these 3 names richard henry edward are more confused than those 500 names in our 3 kingdoms
As an Indian I agree 😂
As a finnish i have to disagree :/ I find those names very distinct from each other. And for me, indian names are more easily recognizable than chinese. It seems that many times chinese names are 3-4 letter long each, with 2-3 names and most of the time there seems to be only one letter difference between those names.
That said, i have to confess that i haven't played the Three Kingdoms game :D Maybe some day :)
@@alaric_ I dont plau 3 kingdoms. The names writen in Chinese charaters are easy for us can read instead of using roman spelling always pronounced the same without tones
@@alaric_ yeah Indian names are super simple 👍🏾. My name is Abhigyan and one of my freind's name is Kshitiz (pronounced Chhitij) and another is Hrishank (pronounced Rishank). Damn Roman characters are needlessly complex
There is nothing more confusing than Asian dynasties... and yall know those where king titles right?
Thanks for this wonderful X-Mas gift...
You are seriously my best History teacher.....I learned so much from you!
had to watch this 3 times to actually understand what was going on. absolute chaos
Especially with repeating names😭😭
ive seen many things covering the war of the roses. This is the most comprehensive version I have ever seen. so well done.
Thank you for this wonderful Christmas gift!
Thanks for watching! Merry Christmas!
The similarities between the wars of the roses and the Sopranos are interesting and instructive in terms of what royalty is actually all about.
That *Five sons surviving into adulthood* quote echoed through the centuries is what defines the wars of the roses😄
Great Job devin.
War/s of the Roses was a later appellation. At the time these battles, which affected the nobility more than it did the peasant commonry, was named The Cousins' War.
Henry the VI was the most popular hostage ever. 5/5 Would capture again.
Nearly hour-long video from Kings and Generals? Now this is what I call an excellent christmas Gift!
Nearly at 1 million subs.
Well deserved guys!
“The Lancastrians had the High Ground”
Obi-Wan Kenobi: *“I have taught them well”*
Hands down the best channel on TH-cam. Thanks for all your hard work putting these together!!
I cannot say it enough: This channel is fabulously and fantastically AWESOME!
This should be played in schools when teaching students about periods of world history!
Bravissimo!
I can barely wait for the 17th Century English Civil Wars.
Oh yeah, that will be glorious!
or the 21st century civil war
Merry Christmas! I noticed y’all are close to 1,000,000 subscribers!! That’s really awesome and I hope y’all get it soon. This channel has been my favorite for historical content this year. Thank you for all the awesome videos!
Merry Christmas!
Achievement Unlocked: Watched the Wars of the Roses Video.
15:06 - - When England was fighting with a foreign enemy, France, the whole English army was 10,000...15,000 in important battles.
But when they were fighting between themselves, in internal conflict, one side musters 30,000, while the other 35,000 soldiers! Both sides combined, 65,000 in total.
Maybe something to do with supply lines
From the 1600s onwards, Britain became almost immune from invasion. Their navy was becoming one of the largest in the world, and being an island with a big navy really helps protect you.
@teslagod2003 Well said. The empire itself didn’t have an emperor as head of state, but not wanting to be considered inferior to the other European emperors, Queen Victoria made herself the Empress of India, so that she had the same authority as the other Great Powers’ leaders.
Perfect, just in time since the Medieval Kingdoms - Campaign Attila mod just released.
- any good?
Finally a solid documentary about the great history of your country? At least judging from your accent ;) Well done! And Merry Christmas :)
Merry Christmas!
Had a great book on this as a kid still trying to find it again. Thanks for your take on this, excellent work.
Always wondered what went on during this war. And wow this channel has delivered on that. Great job to whoever made this video a reality. You people made my day.
I can't stop watching your documentaries, such good work my friends.
The Lancasters send their regards
Do they always pay their debts
Clearest outline of the what and whys of the Wars of the Roses that I've ever seen. Well done.
Who's fightimg for the throne? Lancaster VS York
Tudors: yes
13:44 Richard Of York Gave Battle In Vain - ROYGBIV a handy memory aid for the colours of the rainbow. I think only people from England will have heard that one.
I'll be honest, if you were my teacher going over this in school I would have paid WAY more attention. You have a knack sir for making history interesting. Not a common gift. Thanks for the great videos 👍👍👍
"one of the first Civil Wars in English history."
The Anarchy: *AM I A JOKE TO YOU?!?!*
Simon de Montfort disagrees as well.
@@stephendise7946 that was a baronial war though
@@Tommy-5684 Considering the issues it was still very much a civil conflict.
@@stephendise7946 the Anarchy not so much as many of the solders where Foreign mercenaries often Fleming's and Burgundian and in the chronicles of the time you see these forgings often cast as murderous and rapacious additionally there where also 2 Scottish invasions in 1136 and 1138 and unlike the Scottish invasion in the 1640s the the Scots king was a separate person to the English
there was civil wars going on in britain since before the Romans got here. Its the only way Rome could of got in to britian as the celtic army was far better trained and equiped than the Romans were.
A roman army of 100k under the command of britanicus was totaly destroyed by 40k Celts. Only 10 Romans were left alive. britian was renamed from the celtic name Albion to Britania by Julius Ceaser in honour of his best general. same thing happened on the 2nd attemp by the romans to invade britian.
3rd attempt succeded cause the Romans manged to get celtic tribes fighting each other to weaken them 1st.
Standard Crusader King playthrough I must say
It was said that King Henry IV was the first king of England to speak English as his first language since King Edward the Confessor.
Yes, & the trend would continue until either William III or George I (depending on if you want to count William III's co-monarch Mary II who did speak English as a first language). Henry VII probably1st learned to speak English as a child growing up in the Welsh marches, but later learned Breton & French while in exile on the continent, so he spoke English fluently but with an accent due to being away from home for so long.
As an aside, Henry IV's father John of Gaunt was actually Geoffrey Chaucer's chief patron & financial backer, so it would be a LITTLE odd if his son didn't make a little use of all that beautifully-crafted English.
Gaunt's mistress & 3rd wife Katherine Swynford (née Roet) was also the sister of Chaucer's wife Philippa Roet. Swynford's family came with Edward III's wife from the Low Countries when she came to England; Philippa Roet married Chaucer, Chaucer got employed by Gaunt, & so Philippa's sister Katherine became nanny for Gaunt's children.
Later Katherine became MORE than just a nanny, & had 4 children w/ Gaunt who where legitimated upon their marriage. Henry VII's claim to the throne came from this marriage.
So if it weren't for Chaucer the ultimate Lancastrian heir might never have been born!
I just love Edward and Margaret. They are for sure total beasts. Regardless what is thought of them, these we’re two intense and driven individuals.
which edward and which margaret ?
This rivalry is seen today in football in Leeds vs Manchester United a fierce rivalry still going strong almost 600 years later
The video nicely details the causes and events of the Cousin's War. However, a crucial link not displayed in the family trees at 6:56 and 34:12 is that of Richard of York's full parentage. Although they depict Richard's descent from Edmund of Langley through Richard of Conisburgh, his mother was Anne de Mortimer, daughter of Roger Mortimer (4th Earl of March) and Roger's mother was Philippa (5th Countess of Ulster), daughter to Lionel of Antwerp. This descent from an older son (to Gaunt) of Edward III was Richard's strongest argument for York's ascendancy.
woke up to a notification of a 50 minutes long k&g videos, best christmas present ever
Merry Christmas!
*Let us make famous, that field out there. This little village of Agincourt, that will forever mark the site of your callow disgrace.*
The King was an amazing film
Such a good movie. Seen it three times already
@@AtmasImpaler I can't believe it has been 9 months since that movie was released, does not feel that long ago.
Good movie but to bad the actual battle wasn’t historically accurate and was just all melee combat
@@mijanhoque1740 It was mainly based on the Shakespeare play of Henry V
Finally a comprehensive yet precise clear documentary about this period of British history that an Indian could understand, though with many rewinds. Loved it.
English,Welch,Duch and French Huguenot here. I was born in Lisbon Ohio I'm American and I am greatly interested in things like this. History rules keep up the great work. Maybe we can one day have a video about the French Huguenots coming to England.
Welsh and Dutch…
There's a Lisbon in Ohio?
Ahhh well presented as usual kings and Generals. This is a great gift for Christmas.
So which rose you support ?
neither
Either
York
Edward to Sommerset and the Yorkists: It's over Sommerset! I have the High Ground!
(btw "Sommerset and the Yorkists" sounds like a good Rock Band Name)
Better than Netflix
Certainly cheaper :p
Ever heard of Kings and Generals and chill?
@@thegreendragoninn8730 😂
My 13th Great Grandfather, William Bawden was born in Penryn Cornwall during the last 10 years of the War, and died a few years before Henry the 8ths reign ended.
Dude lived through MONUMENTAL Changes.
Fun fact about the Nevilles and Percys: they both stayed Catholic after the English reformation, which meant that in 1569 they put aside their differences and teamed up to rebel against the Protestant Elizabeth I (Henry Tudor's granddaughter). They were totally crushed.