@hasanjamee Hindus are still proud of their identity. What Dr. Ruchika said is her interpretation. Hinduism is diverse and Inclusive. Unlike a Rigid Cult like you know who
I am amazed that you can even remember so many facts . For most regular ppl , whatever looks Desi is all Hindu and whatever can be connected to arabia is all mslm .. simple bifurcation for simple ppl … and therein lies the crux of all problems
अविचल दूबे। आपका "इसतकबाल" कर रहे हैं। अब इन्हें आपका स्वागत कर रहा हूं कहने मे इन्हें शर्म आ रही है। दक्षिण भारत मे हिन्दी को बढनो का मौका नही मिलता क्यों कि वहां पर उनको अपनी regional भाषा पर अधिक लगाव है। लेकिन है तो अपनी प्राचीन भारतीय भाषा। लेकिन भाई दूबे जी आपको "इस्तकबाल" करने की क्या मजबूरी आ गयी। मैडम की मानसिकता से स्वयं को मैच कर रहे हैं।
I think, she has been planted to delute the reality. On one hand she is saying that History is not science and other hand she is denying ASI methodology. She is not paying any attention to real clues present in Gyanvapi even now.
गुरु शिष्य बहरे हैं दोनों और उस पुस्तक को पढ़ा जिसे एक अंधे ने लिखी थी। ये है कलियुगी पढ़ाई। झूठ का पुलिंदा। मैकाले यूनिवर्सिटी you are burden of earth
very good discussion except few things. Idea of nation may have been developed further in 19th century but it was there before. French Republic for example came into existence towards the end of 17th century. Also, when someone says ‘this was found, that was found’ during excavation a better question to ask is what method was used to codify the message, symbols vs texts. Historians often overlook the methods used to read what was ‘written’ on the excavated evidences.
@@M20-z4jबिल्कुल जैसे आल तौबा की हत्या में अल्लाह पाक महिना गुजर पर काफिरों की हत्या का आदेश देता है जो 1400 सालों में जगह जगह देखने को मिला पर जब बात काफिर की आती है तो तुम जैसे लोग कुछ इतिहास के शब्द को अलग ही रूप दे देते हो जब की काफिर मुस्लिम के अलावा सारी दुनिया हैं
Dr Ruchika , I hv an opinion : Guru Nanak was a great critic of Babur rather he very strongly condemned his attack , brutality . He does not mention anything about Babari Masjid .I think it is bcs destruction of a temple did not happen .
Madam ko ek bar SJ sir (science journey) channel se debate karana chahiye evidence based history. 1. Who is oldest Budha dharma or Hindu Dharma with historical fact.
History ko itna galat likhgya ki jo bharat k loogo ko niche dikhane ki puri koshis k h or usme hamare loog hi samile h .jnu wala historein bahut khatrnak hota h
पडाहूआ मंदिर का स्ट्रक्चर कहां मीला मैडम जी पहले लोगों के मकान बनाने के लिए भी पक्की ईड नहीं मिलती थी अगर आप के पापा जब आई तब तक अगर मंदिर इतने खंडर हो गया तो आप के पापा को सोचना चाहिए की में जो सोच रहा हूं आज बनाने की दादा जी कब बनाया हो गा इस्लाम से कीतना पहले बना है
Vedic Religion is different than Modern Hinduism. Both are different in nature. Jainism and Buddhism came from Shaman Parampara, which is older than Vedic Parampara. Modern Hinduism is a culmination of Vedic Parampara and Shaman Parampara(Buddhism+Jainism) Buddhism and Jainism are older than Modern Hinduism as well.
In oldest buddhist scripture Tripitaka there is a mention about hindu gods like Brahma, Shiva, Varuna, Yama, Prajapati etc.......there is also mention about three Vedas and Vedic Yagya.......So how can u say that Buddhism is older than Hinduism??.......
@@akshaykumar-hr2cx Deities in Rigveda: The Rigveda, the oldest Hindu scripture, doesn't mention Shiva and Brahma as the prominent deities we know today. Instead, it emphasizes Prajapati, the creator god, and Rudra, a fierce storm god associated with destruction. Vedic and Puranic Yama: The concept of Yama does differ between the Vedas and Puranas. In the Vedas, Yama is the first mortal man who died, becoming the ruler of the departed. In the Puranas, he evolves into Dharmaraja, the righteous king who judges the dead. Origins of Hinduism: Vedic religion predates Buddhism. However, Puranic Hinduism, with its elaborate pantheon and temple worship, developed much later. The first temples dedicated to deities like Shiva and Vishnu emerged during the rise of Mahayana Buddhism.
@anilk2100 In Tripitaka, there is Shiva Sutta and Venhu Sutta where deities like Shiva and Vishnu are mentioned.....In Rigveda , there is also mention about lord Vishnu, kindly search "Vishnu in Vedas"......There are also many other Suttas of Tripitaka like Mahasamya Sutta and Dhajagga Sutta where many Hindu deities are mentioned. In the same way, Goddesses like Sri Devi and Kaalkanni ( may be Kali) is also mentioned in oldest part ofJataka stories of Tripitaka....... In Suriya Sutta and Chandima Sutta of Tripitaka ,there is a reference about Rahu trying to swallow Sun god and moon god.....which also shows that these hindu mythology were already popular in Indian society........
@@akshaykumar-hr2cx I think you didn't read properly what i wrote. The Rigveda mentions Vishnu as a minor deity linked to the sun and sacrifice. In the Puranas, he becomes a major god, often seen as the preserver or supreme being. Rudra, a fierce storm god, is mentioned in the Rigveda, but not Shiva as we know him today. Shiva worship likely developed later, merging with aspects of Rudra. Many Hindu deities originated from pre-Vedic times and evolved over time. The arrival of Aryans influenced the pantheon. Elaborate temples for deities like Shiva and Vishnu appeared during the Mahayana Buddhist period, suggesting cultural exchange or parallel development. It's unclear if Buddhists adopted these deities or if there was a complex interaction. Shiva-like figures appear in some Buddhist contexts, but interpretations vary. The Tripitakas date back to around 480 BCE. Everything you mentioned is an alteration or addition to them and not originally there. Just because Buddhism mentions certain deities doesn't mean they adopted them; they might have been created by Buddhism itself. Shared concepts like Yagna in Avestan and Vedic texts suggest a common Indo-Iranian heritage. Hinduism evolved over time, with early Vedas giving way to the more elaborate beliefs of the Puranas. This complex journey reflects a rich history of cultural exchange.
@anilk2100 What i mentioned about Tripitaka is not addition or alteration but the part of most ancient Buddhist Pali Canon. You should read the history of Tripitaka. It is true that Vishnu was not a prominent deity of Vedic religion but Vedas also indicates that there existed a powerful sect during Vedic period who considered Vishnu as their main Deity. Same is also true for Shiva. Only a few hymns are dedicated to Vishnu in Rigveda, but these hymns describe Vishnu as the most important, powerful and omnipotent deity. It is true that modern Hinduism is the combination of different sects like Shaiva , Vaishnav, Shakta, Saurya, Ganpatya etc but it doesn't mean that these sects were seperately not existed during the time of Buddha........ Even in Tripitaka, there is mention about many shrines dedicated to local gods and goddesses who later became part of Hinduism. For example, shrine of Bahuputtika was existed in Magadha at the time of Buddha. Bahuputtika= Bahuputrika which is a goddess who protects children. In present time, many people of North India specially in Bihar still worship goddess like Shashthi, Goddess Shitla , Goddess Mansa who considered as the goddess who protects children. What i m trying to say is that most of the present hindu Dharma deities were already existed and being widely worshipped by people before the time of Buddha...... Later all these sects merged due to their similar ideology and practices and a common term which was used to refer this group is Hinduism........ But if u see closely then u will find that all the elements of Hinduism were already existed ( may be seperately) even before the time of Buddha......
Iske liye to sitaram goyal ko padhna hoga jo apni book me sabhi giraye gaye mandiro ka subut diya hai vo bhi muslim lekhko ke dwara likhe gye book ka hawala diya hai
ASI ka authonticry kuch nahi but a bread and butter office to thwart muslims masjid and makbra and even educational madrasa if not stopped may leads to civilwar
Par Yeh rss kaha se history seekhti hai? 😂..... What sources do they quote for their side of history.. Like this professor gave facts form historical texts and other sources 1:08:58
Gayan vapi were couple some events took place then both changed their religion and accepted islam but put their temple changed and kept nMadjid gayan vapi mssjid
अरे बहन, ऊपर खुले में देख लो, मंदिर ही दिखेगा। खोदने की तो कोई जरूरत ही नहीं है। कम से कम जाके देख तो लो। मुस्लिमों के पक्ष में क्यों बोला, क्या मिला है उनसे तुमको?
Survey ho chuka hai. Prove ho chuka hai. Andhi aakho se dikh raha hai mandir hai. Ye yampanthi full jhoothe hai. Ram mandir ke time pe bhi inhone hi kaam bigada tha
What a wonderful interview!! Absolutely brilliant.
Hats off to the way she patiently answered every question without being dismissive.
She is awesome! And so knowledgeable 🎉
i really wish she appears in more and more platforms, such a clear voice of knowledge and reason in this country is rare. Ma'am you are a star
Stop nonsense.
She is just fabulous - her explanation is mesmerizing. Thanks for inviting Dr. Ruchika Sharma
I can only say great. Thanks!!
17:15 i can understand her expression because my expression was same too when i heard from him.....😂😂😂
शानदार ज्ञानवर्धक प्रोग्राम, रुचिका जी ने बेहतरीन ढंग से बातें समझा दी हैं , सबको देखना चाहिए 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
🔥🔥Mind boggling references with a outstanding framing of sentences
This is why i love this woman. Whe is straight forward plain and clear. No doubts
Great conversation about history ❤
Wrong history
@@jidrit999You get your history lessons from WhatsApp University.
शानदार ज्ञान, स्पष्टता के लिए साधुवाद
Nonsense
Dr Ruchika's distinction of Buddhism and Jainism and Hinduism as seperate religion crushed the hosts Hindu Pride.
Yes
@@Rehan-dm7mp Bhai ka bilkul Dil toot gaya tha. Gehri chot Bhai Ke dhaarmik pride ko
@@hasanjamee 😂😂😂
@@hasanjameeSahi baat hai tum converted ke pass to pride ke liye bhi kuch nhi hai.😂😂😂
@hasanjamee Hindus are still proud of their identity. What Dr. Ruchika said is her interpretation. Hinduism is diverse and Inclusive. Unlike a Rigid Cult like you know who
Fantastic answers by Dr. Ruchika Sharma! Thank you for conducting the interview.
ASI biased hai unhone buddhist pillars ko crushed kia hai 😅 she is sooo honest women ❤
अब वह दिन दूर नहीं जब आज तक के ये एसोसिएट चैनल्स ढींचक पूजा को म्यूजिक की क्लास लेने के बारे में बताएंगे।
Ms.Ruchika , great interview.congratulation.
Please add English subtitles to this one and all of your speeches
आप से इतिहास के बारे में जानने की न ई दृष्टि मिली आपको धन्य वाद
The Real stuff.......Cheers to Ms Sharma.
#Ruchika sharma rocks
Good historical jaankari💯% Ruchika mam
बहुत ही अच्छा है ये video
शानदार। धन्यवाद।
❤❤❤ superb ma'am ✊✊
अति शिक्षित लोगों का यही प्रॉब्लेम है के उनको लगता है के हम जब तक हम 'अछे को बुरा और बुरे को अच्छा नहीं कहेंगे' तब तक हमारे ज्ञान का कुछ काम का नहीं l
this is how a well educated personality talk professionally
Fantastic discussion.. Lekin Bhakt nahi manege 😂
If you have these history books please try and translate them in All languages Ppl will start buying those
Great scholar for educated people not for poorly or watsapp graduate
Very important.
Very nice 👍
I am amazed that you can even remember so many facts . For most regular ppl , whatever looks Desi is all Hindu and whatever can be connected to arabia is all mslm .. simple bifurcation for simple ppl … and therein lies the crux of all problems
🎯
Aurangzeb was limited to Delhi....We got him to Maharashta ...and Rest is History
Very nice answer
Madam absolutely right
अविचल दूबे। आपका "इसतकबाल" कर रहे हैं। अब इन्हें आपका स्वागत कर रहा हूं कहने मे इन्हें शर्म आ रही है। दक्षिण भारत मे हिन्दी को बढनो का मौका नही मिलता क्यों कि वहां पर उनको अपनी regional भाषा पर अधिक लगाव है। लेकिन है तो अपनी प्राचीन भारतीय भाषा। लेकिन भाई दूबे जी आपको "इस्तकबाल" करने की क्या मजबूरी आ गयी। मैडम की मानसिकता से स्वयं को मैच कर रहे हैं।
Eventually He is pure Left
ASI सरकारी है तो तुम भी तो सरकारी हो तुम कैसे निष्पक्ष हो गईं?
इसका असली नाम जहांगीरी मस्जिद है
I think, she has been planted to delute the reality. On one hand she is saying that History is not science and other hand she is denying ASI methodology. She is not paying any attention to real clues present in Gyanvapi even now.
ये पूछने वाले यूँ ही हैँ. दूसरे पक्ष के धुरंधर को बुलाओ और आमने सामने बात करवाओ.
इसे कहते हैं अब्दुल कादिर शाहिद निशाने पर😂😂😂😂😂😂 WhatsApp University ki student😂😂😂
She is amazing when it comes to the source based History.
इनको किसी मामले में क्लाइरिटी ही नहीं है.
Bahut badhiya vishleshan yah Padhi likhi itihaaskar Hain Jo Sach ko Byan kar rahi hai
ग्यान और वापी दोनों अरबी या उर्दू शब्द है जिसका अर्थ है ग्यान का कुआं 😅😅😅😅
madam jb ncert likne walo se pucha gya ki aapka source kya hai to unhone koi reference dene se mna kr diya
Guys Relax she is not in ASI, she is just a Professor 😂
गुरु शिष्य बहरे हैं दोनों और उस पुस्तक को पढ़ा जिसे एक अंधे ने लिखी थी।
ये है कलियुगी पढ़ाई। झूठ का पुलिंदा।
मैकाले यूनिवर्सिटी you are burden of earth
Practical knowledge speaks ..
Ruchika verma 👍👍
very good discussion except few things. Idea of nation may have been developed further in 19th century but it was there before. French Republic for example came into existence towards the end of 17th century. Also, when someone says ‘this was found, that was found’ during excavation a better question to ask is what method was used to codify the message, symbols vs texts. Historians often overlook the methods used to read what was ‘written’ on the excavated evidences.
Very nice
❤❤❤❤
Azeem Hindostan Zindabad ❤❤❤
भाजपा का प्राणतत्व हिन्दू नही है बल्कि मुस्लिम है अगर मुस्लिम ना होता तो भाजपा का अस्तित्व भी नहीं होता और ना भाजपा सत्ता मे होती ,,,,,,,,,,
तुम भोस।वाले हर जगह मां खुदाते मिल जाते हो
Same as For Khnagress Muslim is Life for Khnagress
सारे वामपंथी विचारधारा के इतिहासकारों को बुलाकर सभी तथ्यों को झुठला दो 😂😂😂
Yani Sare ke sare BJP ke what's app university ke historian ko bula ker sab tod mod do
Wa modi ji waa
matlab khaya piya kuch nahi glass thoda barah aane. Suna nahi ki history science nahi hai? phir tathyo ki juthlane ke baat kahan se aayi?
There is nothing like a right wing historian.. Mostly are all whatsapp educated 😂...
@@cooldudeimr inscriptions gyaanvapi aise hi mil gayai na jnu chaap to kal tak her jagh budh ko khoj rahi thi
@@M20-z4jबिल्कुल जैसे आल तौबा की हत्या में अल्लाह पाक महिना गुजर पर काफिरों की हत्या का आदेश देता है जो 1400 सालों में जगह जगह देखने को मिला पर जब बात काफिर की आती है तो तुम जैसे लोग कुछ इतिहास के शब्द को अलग ही रूप दे देते हो जब की काफिर मुस्लिम के अलावा सारी दुनिया हैं
Salami hai ap ko mem
Dr Ruchika , I hv an opinion :
Guru Nanak was a great critic of Babur rather he very strongly condemned his attack , brutality . He does not mention anything about Babari Masjid .I think it is bcs destruction of a temple did not happen .
Madam ko ek bar SJ sir (science journey) channel se debate karana chahiye evidence based history.
1. Who is oldest Budha dharma or Hindu Dharma with historical fact.
History ko itna galat likhgya ki jo bharat k loogo ko niche dikhane ki puri koshis k h or usme hamare loog hi samile h .jnu wala historein bahut khatrnak hota h
Liar.....She doesnt have a clue......
The thing is she is so good that current propaganda or trend of government will not be suited for her ,
INDIA ME SAB SE PAHLI MASJID KERALA ME BANI CHERAMAN JAMA MADJID
L;ol sh;e di;storted the h;istory.
इसको देखकर और सुनकर तो ऐसा ही लगता है, कि इसने अपने प्रोफेसर को कुछ देकर PHD डिग्री लिया है ।
अच्छा जेएनयू से है तब तो कोई बात ही नहीं 😂
She is Giving New ReUse Theory 😅
Madam,you should chair a new independent school of medieval indian history at JNU.2 Professor Habib's can hold joint Vice Chair in that new school.
पडाहूआ मंदिर का स्ट्रक्चर कहां मीला मैडम जी पहले लोगों के मकान बनाने के लिए भी पक्की ईड नहीं मिलती थी अगर आप के पापा जब आई तब तक अगर मंदिर इतने खंडर हो गया तो आप के पापा को सोचना चाहिए की में जो सोच रहा हूं आज बनाने की दादा जी कब बनाया हो गा इस्लाम से कीतना पहले बना है
th-cam.com/video/tNcmwgnuZFs/w-d-xo.html
ज्ञानवापी मंदिर का नक्शा: कहां है स्वयंभू शिवलिंग?
Very controvercial, new debate start
Discussions cannot be made with people claiming fake things.
@@deepasmitlenka7682 right
reporter bahut अज्ञानी h😂😂
Ma'am ka history ka research bahut acha h.
ASI is the way to Hindutava guys since 1925.
We will remember and record all.
Jai Hind.
Vedic Religion is different than Modern Hinduism. Both are different in nature.
Jainism and Buddhism came from Shaman Parampara, which is older than Vedic Parampara.
Modern Hinduism is a culmination of Vedic Parampara and Shaman Parampara(Buddhism+Jainism)
Buddhism and Jainism are older than Modern Hinduism as well.
In oldest buddhist scripture Tripitaka there is a mention about hindu gods like Brahma, Shiva, Varuna, Yama, Prajapati etc.......there is also mention about three Vedas and Vedic Yagya.......So how can u say that Buddhism is older than Hinduism??.......
@@akshaykumar-hr2cx
Deities in Rigveda:
The Rigveda, the oldest Hindu scripture, doesn't mention Shiva and Brahma as the prominent deities we know today. Instead, it emphasizes Prajapati, the creator god, and Rudra, a fierce storm god associated with destruction.
Vedic and Puranic Yama:
The concept of Yama does differ between the Vedas and Puranas. In the Vedas, Yama is the first mortal man who died, becoming the ruler of the departed. In the Puranas, he evolves into Dharmaraja, the righteous king who judges the dead.
Origins of Hinduism:
Vedic religion predates Buddhism. However, Puranic Hinduism, with its elaborate pantheon and temple worship, developed much later. The first temples dedicated to deities like Shiva and Vishnu emerged during the rise of Mahayana Buddhism.
@anilk2100 In Tripitaka, there is Shiva Sutta and Venhu Sutta where deities like Shiva and Vishnu are mentioned.....In Rigveda , there is also mention about lord Vishnu, kindly search "Vishnu in Vedas"......There are also many other Suttas of Tripitaka like Mahasamya Sutta and Dhajagga Sutta where many Hindu deities are mentioned. In the same way, Goddesses like Sri Devi and Kaalkanni ( may be Kali) is also mentioned in oldest part ofJataka stories of Tripitaka.......
In Suriya Sutta and Chandima Sutta of Tripitaka ,there is a reference about Rahu trying to swallow Sun god and moon god.....which also shows that these hindu mythology were already popular in Indian society........
@@akshaykumar-hr2cx I think you didn't read properly what i wrote.
The Rigveda mentions Vishnu as a minor deity linked to the sun and sacrifice. In the Puranas, he becomes a major god, often seen as the preserver or supreme being.
Rudra, a fierce storm god, is mentioned in the Rigveda, but not Shiva as we know him today. Shiva worship likely developed later, merging with aspects of Rudra.
Many Hindu deities originated from pre-Vedic times and evolved over time. The arrival of Aryans influenced the pantheon.
Elaborate temples for deities like Shiva and Vishnu appeared during the Mahayana Buddhist period, suggesting cultural exchange or parallel development.
It's unclear if Buddhists adopted these deities or if there was a complex interaction. Shiva-like figures appear in some Buddhist contexts, but interpretations vary.
The Tripitakas date back to around 480 BCE. Everything you mentioned is an alteration or addition to them and not originally there. Just because Buddhism mentions certain deities doesn't mean they adopted them; they might have been created by Buddhism itself.
Shared concepts like Yagna in Avestan and Vedic texts suggest a common Indo-Iranian heritage.
Hinduism evolved over time, with early Vedas giving way to the more elaborate beliefs of the Puranas. This complex journey reflects a rich history of cultural exchange.
@anilk2100 What i mentioned about Tripitaka is not addition or alteration but the part of most ancient Buddhist Pali Canon. You should read the history of Tripitaka.
It is true that Vishnu was not a prominent deity of Vedic religion but Vedas also indicates that there existed a powerful sect during Vedic period who considered Vishnu as their main Deity. Same is also true for Shiva. Only a few hymns are dedicated to Vishnu in Rigveda, but these hymns describe Vishnu as the most important, powerful and omnipotent deity.
It is true that modern Hinduism is the combination of different sects like Shaiva , Vaishnav, Shakta, Saurya, Ganpatya etc but it doesn't mean that these sects were seperately not existed during the time of Buddha........
Even in Tripitaka, there is mention about many shrines dedicated to local gods and goddesses who later became part of Hinduism. For example, shrine of Bahuputtika was existed in Magadha at the time of Buddha. Bahuputtika= Bahuputrika which is a goddess who protects children.
In present time, many people of North India specially in Bihar still worship goddess like Shashthi, Goddess Shitla , Goddess Mansa who considered as the goddess who protects children.
What i m trying to say is that most of the present hindu Dharma deities were already existed and being widely worshipped by people before the time of Buddha......
Later all these sects merged due to their similar ideology and practices and a common term which was used to refer this group is Hinduism........
But if u see closely then u will find that all the elements of Hinduism were already existed ( may be seperately) even before the time of Buddha......
As vimoh said,if any history makes u angry ,u r not reading history
इतना ज्ञान मेडम जी ने कहां से उठाई है ।
लगता whatsApp से ।😂
Samosa jalebi bhi faras se hai
Dr Ruchika what do u say about Guru Teg Bahadur was killed during Aurangzeb time ?
She is so blind to see the temple at Kashi and Nandi. She is a convert.
To aap saboot de do ki mandir Kahan thi or masjid Kahan bani
Iske liye to sitaram goyal ko padhna hoga jo apni book me sabhi giraye gaye mandiro ka subut diya hai vo bhi muslim lekhko ke dwara likhe gye book ka hawala diya hai
ASI ka authonticry kuch nahi but a bread and butter office to thwart muslims masjid and makbra and even educational madrasa if not stopped may leads to civilwar
Par Yeh rss kaha se history seekhti hai? 😂..... What sources do they quote for their side of history.. Like this professor gave facts form historical texts and other sources 1:08:58
Great ruchika sharma
Gayan vapi were couple some events took place then both changed their religion and accepted islam but put their temple changed and kept nMadjid gayan vapi mssjid
This video will get billions views when a person will reach to its full intelligence capacity
Khatna khatna khatna khatna😅
अरे बहन, ऊपर खुले में देख लो, मंदिर ही दिखेगा। खोदने की तो कोई जरूरत ही नहीं है। कम से कम जाके देख तो लो।
मुस्लिमों के पक्ष में क्यों बोला, क्या मिला है उनसे तुमको?
Visit Kashi Visvnath to make your own view,
Less knowledge is more dangerous. She's exactly what made it👎.
Zinda bad bitya
Jyada padhne likhne se dimag bhrasht ho hi jata h waise madm famously left mindset ki h romila thapar team 😅😅
History kuch bhi ho mogalo ki mujhe nai jaanna
Par Bharat me humare Ram sabse pehle the or hum hindu unke vanshaj he…!! That’s it ✋🏽
Deedi pehle apne cleavage dikha kar youtube pe video dalti thi
Fir dalan-top ne deedi ko bulaya
Deedi popular ho gayi
Eminent historians 2.O
डॉ रुचिका जी को सलाम arz हो
आर्य बाहर से आए, यह भी एक झूठ. अम्बेडकर ने खंडन कर रखा है. संजय दीक्षित तो करोड रूपये का ईनाम रखा है यह सिद्ध करने वाले को.
Gayanvapi to us ilake ka nam he jhan par ye masjid bani hui he
#End the conflict , mandir torke majhid bana hee or nehi bana hee survey karo yarr
Survey ho chuka hai. Prove ho chuka hai. Andhi aakho se dikh raha hai mandir hai. Ye yampanthi full jhoothe hai. Ram mandir ke time pe bhi inhone hi kaam bigada tha
bola jata hoga wah
All her knowledge is based on romila thapar books, so you can know where this all come from
Deedi pehle apne cleavage dikha kar youtube pe video dalti thi
Fir dalan-top ne deedi ko bulaya
Deedi popular ho gayi
Eminent historians 2.O
All your presumption comes from WhatsApp university,so we can know where your shit comes from