Douglas B-18 Bolo in the WWII Gallery (Sept 2021)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024
  • The Douglas Aircraft Co. developed the B-18 to replace the Martin B-10 as the U.S. Army Air Corps' standard bomber. Based on the Douglas DC-2 commercial transport, the prototype B-18 competed with the Martin 146 (an improved B-10) and the four-engine Boeing 299, forerunner of the B-17, at the Air Corps bombing trials at Wright Field in 1935. Although many Air Corps officers judged the Boeing design superior, the Army General Staff preferred the less costly Bolo (along with 13 operational test YB-17s). The Air Corps later ordered 217 more as B-18As with the bombardier's position extended forward over the nose gunner's station.
    Though equipped with inadequate defensive armament and underpowered, the Bolo remained the Air Corps' primary bomber into 1941, and the Japanese destroyed some B-18s during the surprise attacks on Dec. 7. By early 1942, improved bombers like the B-17 replaced the Bolo as first-line bombardment aircraft. Many B-18s were then used as transports, or modified as B-18Bs for anti-submarine duty.
    Stationed at Wright Field from 1939 to 1942, the B-18A on display was acquired and restored by the museum in 1971. It is painted as a B-18A serving with the 38th Reconnaissance Squadron in 1939.

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @taofledermaus
    @taofledermaus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish my truck was this clean.

  • @davef.2811
    @davef.2811 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One of my late dad's first jobs in the USAAC in WWII was crew chief on the west coast (maybe March AFB) in one of these. Then they were later replaced with B-23 Dragons.

  • @monroetoolman
    @monroetoolman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Toured the museum several times over the years, so it`s great to finally get to see inside the displays. Someone did an excellent job restoring the Bolo.

    • @rudyyarbrough5122
      @rudyyarbrough5122 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It looked like the pilot's seat could use a little TLC.

  • @Flyingbrickyard
    @Flyingbrickyard 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I'm still amazed at how accurately (overall) this aircraft was portrayed in the 1943 Bugs Bunny Cartoon, "Falling Hare".
    Nice to see the inside for real. I love this series of videos, please keep them coming!

    • @USAFmuseum
      @USAFmuseum  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks so much!!!

  • @flyingfortressrc1794
    @flyingfortressrc1794 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video, Thank you.
    I've always wondered what it looked like in a B-18.

  • @anthonysantiago1999
    @anthonysantiago1999 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Funny thing, I just finished watching the movie "Bombardier" made in 1943 and was wondering what type aircraft that was with the funny nose.. Great video on type aircraft.

  • @shawnkelley9942
    @shawnkelley9942 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent!

  • @Dog.soldier1950
    @Dog.soldier1950 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Was this the same AC that was at McChord field museum?

  • @walterg.dinkla2478
    @walterg.dinkla2478 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well-made video! Kudos!

  • @thecreekwalker0174
    @thecreekwalker0174 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very cool

    • @USAFmuseum
      @USAFmuseum  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for viewing!!!

  • @thurin84
    @thurin84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    the usaac chose unwisely. never seen inside one before. that was cool!

  • @wr82
    @wr82 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The aircraft looks amazing! Are most of the aircrafts interiors at the museum in such great condition?

    • @USAFmuseum
      @USAFmuseum  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Belle is the most recent resto and it's amazing!!!

  • @flypawels
    @flypawels 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like a brand new aircraft.

    • @davef.2329
      @davef.2329 14 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The new ones of today certainly won't look like this in 85 yrs.

  • @Chilly_Billy
    @Chilly_Billy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    To think this aircraft competed against what would become the B-17 is almost laughable.

    • @DickieDelouise
      @DickieDelouise 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The crazy part is the Army Air Corps picked the B-18 over the model 299/Y1B-17 for the contract! If my memory serves me correctly, the Air Corps brass was worried the Fortress would be too complex to mass produce (wrong!), And they were slightly near sighted lol.