What enfuriates me about him is that he's made of gold, and although, he was like that in original books.. GOLD MELT WITH FIRE!! I'm serious, couldn't they make him bronze for a change or some material more solid than gold? Sure, it would disgrace the original design, but at least he would look unstoppable and his defeat wouldn't be so anti-climatic. (which brings me to another issue with this.. The scientist dude made his dragons a hunter for other dragons and yet, he doesn't even fly?.. HOW IN THE HECK IS HE SUPPOSE TO CATCH THEM IN THEIR FLYING IN THE AIR?? BY WAITING FOR THEM??)
He's magic, and is in some way connected to water. He can travel anywhere through it, and his scales are as cold as the ocean, fire is useless against him. As for catching when they are flying, two answers. One, he is supposed to have a flock of magical ravens which can block out the moons light, preventing dragosn from flying, and two, he finds the sport fun.
@AlexBadger Because the movies is only "inspired" by the book there are many things which don´t add up or are different like when Twigleg asked how they would communicate and Nettlebrand says Skype but in the book they could use water as a way to communicate. Or the fact he says "I never heard of a Silver Dragon" but from the book it sounds like that every dragon is silver.
This is perhaps the most shameful ripp off of how to train your dragon The greatest animated trilogy of all time And I've seen ripp offs so cheep their helerias to watch You can just see how little they cared about this film All the actors sound like their not even trying The animation for the most part is bland and in some shots it looks ugly And it's heard to feel anything This is perhaps the most boring dragon movie I've ever seen And to add insult to injury They had Patrick Stewart play the villan And he Bearley dose anything with his role It actually would have worked if they had seth machfarlen to voice one of his slaves Would it have made the movie better No but it would have made a nice references to American dad
@keironknapp7070 On what grounds? Without mentioning that there are dragons, someone riding a dragon, and the title. I hold the book very near and dear to my heart so i hope your reply is satisfactory.
@asta5907 if you grow up with this franchise That's a great thing In my opinion This movie was just a cheep cast grab ment to get on with the hype of the httyd franchise They even made a parody of it in the movie itself
This movie is based on the german book Dragon Rider by Cornelia Funke. The original book Dragon Rider is 6 years older than the books How to train your dragon are based on. For comparison: Dragon Rider (1997) How to train your dragon (2003)
@@SmilerCalvin Hard agreed on that. It still breaks my heart that this was the adaptation of my favorite book. At least the author agrees with me. She also hates this movie
His roar sounds like sharptooth in the land before time
He does roar
Stoick the vast
He's a monster!
Yeah no sh@%
He is my favourite villain
Iink of the full movie please
What enfuriates me about him is that he's made of gold, and although, he was like that in original books.. GOLD MELT WITH FIRE!!
I'm serious, couldn't they make him bronze for a change or some material more solid than gold?
Sure, it would disgrace the original design, but at least he would look unstoppable and his defeat wouldn't be so anti-climatic.
(which brings me to another issue with this.. The scientist dude made his dragons a hunter for other dragons and yet, he doesn't even fly?.. HOW IN THE HECK IS HE SUPPOSE TO CATCH THEM IN THEIR FLYING IN THE AIR?? BY WAITING FOR THEM??)
He's magic, and is in some way connected to water. He can travel anywhere through it, and his scales are as cold as the ocean, fire is useless against him. As for catching when they are flying, two answers. One, he is supposed to have a flock of magical ravens which can block out the moons light, preventing dragosn from flying, and two, he finds the sport fun.
@AlexBadger Because the movies is only "inspired" by the book there are many things which don´t add up or are different like when Twigleg asked how they would communicate and Nettlebrand says Skype but in the book they could use water as a way to communicate. Or the fact he says "I never heard of a Silver Dragon" but from the book it sounds like that every dragon is silver.
This is perhaps the most shameful ripp off of how to train your dragon
The greatest animated trilogy of all time
And I've seen ripp offs so cheep their helerias to watch
You can just see how little they cared about this film
All the actors sound like their not even trying
The animation for the most part is bland and in some shots it looks ugly
And it's heard to feel anything
This is perhaps the most boring dragon movie I've ever seen
And to add insult to injury
They had Patrick Stewart play the villan
And he Bearley dose anything with his role
It actually would have worked if they had seth machfarlen to voice one of his slaves
Would it have made the movie better
No but it would have made a nice references to American dad
the book was made before how to train your dragons...?
@Caterpillar_Gaming yah
But the movie ripps off more from how to train your dragon then you realise
@keironknapp7070
On what grounds? Without mentioning that there are dragons, someone riding a dragon, and the title. I hold the book very near and dear to my heart so i hope your reply is satisfactory.
@asta5907 if you grow up with this franchise
That's a great thing
In my opinion
This movie was just a cheep cast grab ment to get on with the hype of the httyd franchise
They even made a parody of it in the movie itself
This is the worst dragon in the dumbest dragon movie ripoff of How To Train Your Dragon
wait your here too?-
im josh LMAO
@@crawlcreeper1252 yes, also I didn't know it was you Josh-
This movie is based on the german book Dragon Rider by Cornelia Funke. The original book Dragon Rider is 6 years older than the books How to train your dragon are based on.
For comparison:
Dragon Rider (1997)
How to train your dragon (2003)
@@REDFRLegend I know, but this is the worst film adaptation
@@SmilerCalvin Hard agreed on that. It still breaks my heart that this was the adaptation of my favorite book. At least the author agrees with me. She also hates this movie