🎹 Casio PX-S5000 vs Casio PX-S1100 | Casio Privia PX-S5000 Digital Piano In-Depth Review 🎹
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 มิ.ย. 2024
- 🛒 Shop Casio PX-S5000 ▸snip.ly/s82s1n
🛒 Shop More Casio Digital Pianos ▸geni.us/Casio-Digital-Pianos
💕 Subscribe to Merriam Pianos ▸ bit.ly/SubscribeMerriam
🔔 Click the 🔔 bell to be notified of all videos! ▸ bit.ly/SubscribeMerriam
#digitalpiano #casio #casioprivia #piano
0:00 - Video Introduction Casio PX-S5000 v.s. Casio PX-S1100
0:57 - Opening Playing Demo on the PX-S 1100
1:09 - Opening Playing Demo on the PX-S5000
1:21 - Video Overview
4:20 - Piano sound/tone and specs on the Casio PX-S1100 and PX-S5000
8:04 - Piano Sound Demo Comparison
9:51 - Playing the Casio PX-S5000
10:13 - Playing the Casio PX-S1100
10:30 - Discussion on the differences between piano sounds
11:06 - Playing demo on the Casio PX-S1100 and 5000
12:24 - Acoustic Piano Experience on the Casio PX-S1100 and Casio PX-S5000
14:07 Exploring different tones on the Casio PX-S1100 and Casio PX-S5000
15:14 - Conclusions on the different piano sounds
16:01 - Casio PX-S1100 and Casio PX-S5000 Sound Spec Slide
16:11 - Piano Action review and discussion on the Casio PX-S1100 and Casio PX-S5000
19:20 - Discussion on Casio Action and weighting
21:49 - Listening to the mechanical sound of the actions on the PX-S1100 and PX-S5000
26:51 - The texture and finish of both Casio Piano Actions
29:36 - Conclusions on Casio PX-S1100 and Casio PX-S5000 actions
31:14 - Casio PX-S1100 and PX-S5000 Piano Action Spec Slide
31:26 - Piano features review
35:52 - Piano Features and Connectivity Spec Slide on the Casio PX-S1100 and Casio PX-S5000
36:14 - Video outro and conclusions
Hello and welcome to the Merriam Pianos TH-cam channel. Casio recently announced the addition of 3 brand new models to their Privia PX-S lineup, and today we’ll be comparing the new PX-S5000 to the stalwart PX-S1100.
Is the PX-S5000 simply a reworked PX-S1100 with a jacked-up price, or does the S5000 represent a meaningful upgrade and occupy a different class in the market? This is what we’ll be answering today.
Please like, subscribe and hit that notification bell!
Overview
Right when we saw the spec sheet and got our first PX-S5000 from Casio, we could tell where early online discourse is going to be headed - arguments as to whether or not the S5000 is simply just an overpriced PX-S1100 with a rebranded action.
After getting both pianos side by side, it’s clear that there are very substantial differences in the actions and tone engines of these two pianos from a musical experience perspective.
The PX-S5000 really does represent a different class of instrument from the S1100, and we’re going to get into why that’s the case.
Piano Sound
On paper, the sound should be the same between these two pianos. Both instruments have 192 notes of polyphony. 16 watts of amp power, roughly the same amount of tones, and the same Multi-Dimensional Morphing AiR Sound Source.
Now, Casio does mention that the S5000 has received their Hamburg Grand sample, which was previously reserved for their high-end Celviano GP instruments, and they’ve also stated that the AiR engine has been tweaked for optimization when paired with the new key action.
To really hear the differences, we played an identical MIDI file through each piano's tone engine on the default grand piano patch. It was apparent right away that the S5000 has far more detail in the lower range, and there’s more color, width and depth to the attack in the upper register.
We can say unequivocally; the acoustic piano experience is superior on the PX-S5000, which is most apparent when playing with headphones.
In terms of other piano tones and non-acoustic piano patches, the differences seemingly disappear.
Piano Action
Piano actions generally aren’t very controversial, but the Smart Scaled Hammer Action Keyboard first introduced in the PX-S1000 was somewhat divisive. Due to the super slim cabinet, the Smart Scaled action features a shorter keystick length that leads to the keys feeling heavier at the top and light at the bottom and also happens to lead to subtle differences between how the white and black keys feel from one another.
The new Smart Hybrid Hammer Action Keyboard in the PX-S5000 feels very different from the Smart Scaled action despite relatively similar geometric designs. This is very clear when you turn the volume down and simply play both actions - the Smart Hybrid action is quieter with less mechanical noise.
This is partially due to the Smart Hybrid action incorporating wood into the white keys. This also makes the keys feel more realistic, and the cushioning is better here with reduced lateral motion as well.
The last point of departure relates to the keytops; both actions have simulated ivory and ebony keytops, but the Smart Scaled keytops feel more slippery than the Smart Hybrid action. A preference here will be totally personal, but it’s an observation worth pointing out nonetheless
.... - เพลง
Love your reviews. very thorough and thoughtful. subscribed.
Thank you so much for the kind words and subscription! We appreciate it. :)
Thank you very much Stu for your so many good, practical
and educational reviews. I'm so inspired to learn more for playing piano at age of 65 and hope one day to play so beautiful as you. 👌🏼🙏🏼
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks so much for tuning in! I will be sure to share your kind words with Stu on your behalf. :)
Thank you for this great review.
You're very welcome! :)
Very, very, very well explained. Your way to compare pianos is the best. In my opinion. Thanks.
You're very welcome! Thanks so much for the kind words! We appreciate it. :)
Great review!!!
Thank you! Thanks for tuning in! :)
This is EXACTLY the video I've been waiting for, because this is precisely the question that's been in my mind. Thanks!
You're very welcome! We're glad that you found the video helpful. Thanks for tuning in and supporting the channel! :)
Appreciate the attention to keyboard noise/looseness. Was curious about the wood keys you addressed.
We're glad to hear that you found the video useful! Thanks for watching! :)
Thanks for the vid!
You're very welcome! :)
Here are the numbers illustrating the action difference.
PX-S1100
Middle C (C4) - ~61g
C7 - 55g
C6 - less than 60g
C2 - ~65g
C3 - more than 60g
C4# - 40g - 60g (middle of black key)
~75g to get the sound (T/S) (long sound) on C4
PX-S5000
Middle C (C4) - ~54g
C7 - less than 50g
C6 - ~50g
C2 - less than 60g
C3 - ~56-57g
C4# - ~46g - 57g (middle of black key)
C4 - ~65g to get the sound (T/S) (long sound), C7 - 60g, C2 - 70g (T).
I am now comparing P-225 and PX-S5000
Michael
Thanks for sharing! :)
22:20 This comparison was what I really wanted to see for a long long time!!!!
We're happy to hear that! Thanks for tuning in! :)
8:09 this NOCTURN never gets old🎹🎶
Absolutely! It is a beautiful piece! :)
It seems to me that wood key side also add continuous mass which affect the momentum of the keys. The momentum will affect acceleration as you press the key. In a portable instrument every gram must be justified. Your review tells me Casio made good improvements here.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! I have not had the opportunity to play on the PXS5000 or PXS7000 myself yet, but, based on what i have heard from my colleagues that have, Casio has knocked things out of the park in terms of the action! :)
Thank you so much for your thorough comparison and views! I'm a classically trained advanced pianist from late childhood through college, and after having stepped away from piano for almost a decade I've been wanting to get back into steady regular playing again (and branch outside classical too). My piano I've had since teens is a Hallet Davis baby grand which I still own (and love and picked out because of its tone), however I haven't been able to transport it anywhere with me since college because apartments. Casio's seem to pique my ears in interest the most. I definitely hear the differences in the 1100 and 5000, and gather I'd probably appreciate the depth and richness of sound in 5000. In general since I'd be transitioning to digital piano and prize the sound and feel/action over anything else, is the PX-S5000 a solid transition to consider when going from so far lifelong baby grand playing to digital? (or even the S7000) Or is another brand better yet?
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! You're very welcome! Thanks for tuning in. We're glad that you have found the review and comparison videos helpful. :)
In terms of how the Casio PXS models' actions compare to that of acoustic grands' actions, there are some key details to note that would not make them my top suggestion if you are looking for the most authentic touch in a portable digital piano. Firstly, the lack of escapement/let-off will leave something to be desired if you are coming from playing on an acoustic grand piano. Furthermore, while the PXS models are incredibly portable and provide an immense musical experience for their size, the smaller enclosure does mean that the key and pivot length are compromised and shortened.
With that said, if they are within the budget, the Kawai ES920 and Roland FP90X would be my top suggestions for all-in portable digital pianos that best simulate the feeling of an acoustic grand piano. There are stage pianos at higher price points that even offer more authenticity (such as the Kawai MP11SE), but they do not have built-in speakers, which makes them a very different offering. The ES920 and FP90X actions both capture many of the sensations that one would associate with an acoustic grand piano and offer an impressive pivot length for their size.
At the end of the day, everything I've written here comes down to my own personal subjectivity. Our recommendation is always to find your way into a showroom and test out the various models that interest you. Every pianist's playing style is different. The most important thing is for you to find a tone and touch that you personally connect with. :)
Robert Estrin is using Casio PX-S3000 for practice.
Thanks for your insights.
I just assumed it was measurably better because of the price. I also assumed that it wouldn’t be worth upgrading from my PX-560. It may be visually nice to look at and have better tones but the PX-560 is still a better value for me. $2,500 buys a lot of musical kit.
You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in and supporting the channel! :)
Stu you mentioned the action on the Casio PSX5000 reminds you most of the RH3 action of the Kawai. Does the lack of escapement on the PSX 5000 distance it significantly from the RH3 action, and is it really worth the extra money for the Kawai ES 920 RH3 action. I know it's apples to oranges in the price category, but most important to me is the sound through the headphones and the action. Looking to buy my first digital piano to remain in the home. I am used to the action on the acoustic Yamaha U1 studio upright I've had for 30 years, might want a little lighter action at my age. I enjoy your playing talent and informative videos immensely. Thank you.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! These two actions have some similarities, as Stu mentions, but they are quite different in a number of ways. For me, the two biggest differences are the presence of escapement (or lack thereof) and the key texture. Personally, I enjoy escapement as I feel a greater sense of connectivity to the instrument and have an easier time controlling delicate dynamics. The other big difference is key texture. The Casio instruments have a more matte key finish with a more pronounces texture. Some players, especially those that perspire when playing, really enjoy this feature. However, for me, I lean a little bit more in favour of the RHIII's more traditional key surface. My suggestion would be to try both of these pianos out at a showroom to see which one you resonate with as they offer very different musical experiences. Thanks and all the best! :)
Nice review, are there any news for a successor of the yamaha p125?
Thank you kindly! We appreciate the support! I have not personally heard or seen any announcements at this time. :)
I would like to try one. I own 2 3100s and 2 1100s. Your review of the sound improvement makes me want to check my receipt and see if I can return one of my Casios for a 5000. But I gather the action is heavier, and that’s a deal breaker. I like that the weight is still pretty portable. I rather bring a $700 keyboard to gig than a $1200 especially when there’s inebriated folks. I have owned Yamaha, Nord, Kawai, Roland, Kurzweil…took them all back for the action and sound of a Casio. Stu, your reviews are great.
Thanks for tuning in! We're glad that you enjoy our reviews! Portability is certainly an important consideration for gigging players. That is definitely one of the appealing things about the PXS1100 and PXS3100 models. Excellent touch and tone in a very streamlined, lightweight enclosure. :)
Hi Buddy, Do you feel any difference between the 1100 and the 3100, using the same piano tone ? Thanks
@@ricardomc1452 Nope! 🙂
the new Privia lineup is really nice I love the design and the compact form factor but I wish they made it 1 inch deeper so it can accommodate a longer pivot point, since this action is in the s6000 and even s7000 I find it unacceptable for this price point. They would really improve on the action because they have a good selection of samples with a stunning design.
The new offering from Casio is quite exciting to say the least! While I know some players have concerns about the pivot length, my recommendation would be to test out the playability and action for yourself as you may be surprised with the touch that it offers despite the action's more compact design. Also, for gigging players, the portability factor is extremely attractive! :)
Ty for your work! Could you please say if these models can be split into zones when used for midi input in a DAW?
Thanks for tuning in! I will be sure to pass on the suggestion to Stu and the production team! With that said, it might be worthwhile for us to tackle a video on digital pianos doubling as MIDI controllers.
The PSX6000 has 256 polyphony too, according to the spec on their website. I compared the specs of 6000 and 7000, - the main difference. Number of Tones (350/400), 7000 has Internal Memory, Fixed 3 pedals, and slight different in control panel.
As for 5000, less polyphony and a lot less tones - 23 only. And smaller speakers.
Thank you kindly for tuning in and sharing the specification differences! Much appreciated! You can certainly expect some more comparison videos featuring these new Casio Privia PXS models very soon! :)
The speaker size is the same in all 5 models (PX-S1100, 3100, 5000, 6000, 7000). The difference is in the number of speakers and amplifiers. The PX-S1100/3100/5000 have 2 audio channels and two speakers, whereas the PX-S6000/7000 have 4 audio channels and 4 speakers.
@@Instrumental-Covers what's your take on comparing the PX-S5000 with the FP-30X? The performance the 30X is delivering at this price point of 680€ compared to the Casio of 1150€ is confusing and amazing at the same time. I mean, the 30X has greater polyphony (which does not really matter tbh, bc 192 is fk enough if we're real here, I dont think anyone would notice a difference between being able to hear 192 oder 256 tones simultaneously) and it also has a good key action. But I guess the quality of the sound is better in the Casio. Well, it must be doesnt it? It only has 23 sounds and is way more expensive... Would like to hear your take on that.
@@zjaeger1800 Thank you for asking. I haven't seen the PX-S5000 in person yet, although I have played the FP30X and the PX-S1100... and the PX-S5000 sounds fairly close to the PX-S5000, at least in this video... the PX-S1000 has a more intimate character than the FP30X from what I remember, but it is so at the expense of what I call a "blurred" sound, with little definition. It is like watching an old postcard with low resolution. It may look nice, but you can't see the details. Same with the sample in the PX-S1100, which is likely to translate to the PX-S5000. There was also an unnatural transition from pianissimo to fortissimo in the PX-S1100, where you could hear some harsh metallic overtones in some notes... but Roland has that problem too. To be fair, Kawai and Yamaha have the same issue on their cheaper models. You have to wait to get a Clavinova CLP-700 series to hear a smoother transition in the default sample. But then you can adjust the touch sensitivity... my point is: it is difficult to make an absolute statement here. It is more about cons and pros.... they are imperfect instruments... the closest I have owned to the models presented here would be the Casio CDP-S350 and the Roland FP50 and RP401R. In a way, each company has its "personality", which distills even in later models. So, I would say that Casio has traditionally sounded like a toy when it comes to pianos, and there is a short decay in their samples that reveal or emphasize this toy-like character. Roland sounds somehow better, but somehow "saturated" or artificial too. I am not a fan of the sound of neither one, but at the same time they both can be satisfying to own. I can definitely have a lot of fun with either one :)
@@Instrumental-Covers thanks for the details :-)
I'm guessing that having more than one material in a key stick (more than just resin/plastic anyway) helps reduce key warp, which is a major cause of sticking keys. All too often, an otherwise useful digital piano has to be thrown away due to sticking keys. Maybe they can be fixed (at a stiff price) but few pianists even know where to send their instruments. Hmmm, maybe this is an after sales issue that Merriam can comment on?
Hi Mike! We have some wonderful digital piano technicians that can work some miracles to help resolve problematic actions. The wooden side panelling definitely makes the action more solid and durable as well as less prone to warping.
my plan right now is to use a Roland FP-30X, and use Pianoteq to get Steinway D sound, and the K2 which might be Kawai sound. I also like the Blüthner sound there
That would make for a very excellent setup in terms of touch and tone! :)
Thanks for your beautiful reviews . A question: i 'm playing a "poor" Roland Fp-10. I would like a new instrument with a better action (even if the action of my Fp 10 in quite good ). I'm studying piano after many years - Should this new Casio Px S- serie be an improvement in terms of keybed/action of my setup ? Thanks a lot!
You're very welcome! We're glad that you've been enjoying them! The answer to your question will always be a subjective one. With that said, it also depends on the style of music you're playing as well as the contexts you'll be playing in. For instance, if you are studying classical piano playing and will be doing examinations and concerts on a grand piano, the Roland FP10's PHA4 action features more of the sensations you will feel on the "real thing". With that said, there are other things to factor in as well. For instance, the FP10 is restricted to a single sustain pedal. When playing advanced classical repertoire, using the soft/una corda pedal and sostenuto pedal will be required. The FP10 will be limiting from this perspective. Thanks and hope this helps! :)
@@MerriamPianos thanks a lot...yes i found you comparison between fp30x and the new Casio. As you say ...PhA4 in a little bit more noisy...because Casio's keys have wood, and Fp30x keys haven't....But you like PHA4, and honestly i like too.....thanks a lot!
I have 1000,1100 and saw 7000,6000 came out, I just stopped looking till this moment convince me Stu to jump back in this pursue 🙏🙏
The new instalments from Casio into their Privia PXS line are quite impressive to say the least! :)
Ciao Stu, questo è il mio secondo commento in merito a questi due pianoforti digitali. Finalmente li ho potuti provare fianco a fianco. Queste le mie impressioni. Ho provato il 5000 sia con le casse interne allo strumento che con una cassa esterna appoggiata al pavimento e poi l'ho confrontato con il 1100. Ho provato solamente il campione del pianoforte principale che è quello che differisce molto tra i due strumenti. Con le casse interne la differenza dal punto di vista sonoro si sentiva. Poi ,con la cassa esterna sembrava di sentire un pianoforte acustico verticale. Straordinario!!! Utilizzando solo le casse interne si perdono tantissimi particolari. Credo quindi che la soluzione migliore sia quello di collegarlo con una buona cassa amplificata. Il 1100 comunque suona molto bene anche lui con meno dettagli ma è godibile. In merito all'azione dei tasti mi sono piaciuti entrambi. la tastiera è reattiva e divertente pur essendo più leggera di una PHA-4. Mi piace molto il ritorno del tasto rapido, non perdi mai il controllo sulla tastiera. Sinceramente, non ho trovato differenze di peso tra i tasti bianchi e quelli neri. Il rapporto qualità prezzo del 1100 qui in Italia è molto elevato meno per quanto riguarda il 5000 (ma c'è da dire che il 5000 è appena uscito e con il tempo il suo prezzo tenderà a scendere un poco) Penso che il lavoro di progettazione degli ingegneri giapponesi per questi modelli sia straordinario. Un saluto dall'Italia. Ciao.
Hi Roberto! Thanks again for tuning in and sharing your insights! I am glad to hear that you had an opportunity to test out both of these fantastic digital piano offerings from Casio side-by-side. I definitely agree with the sentiment about external amps. I recently played the PXS7000 through a very high-quality stereo keyboard amp and was blown away with how the piano sounds were presented sonically. I have heard that the price gap between these models is a lot more pronounced in different markets, but, hopefully, the PXS5000 will come down a bit in your region. Thanks again and happy playing! :)
I am very interested in the new PX-S5000, mainly because the keyboard is finer and less noisy.
I have now been able to test a PX-S5000. I can confirm that the white keys have become so much smoother and quieter to play. It really is a great pleasure. On the PX-S5000 I tested, however, I found that the black keys were more or less the same as on the PX-S1100. Clacking and bouncy. This is very noticeable compared to the formidable white keys.
Is this PX-S5000 an outlier? Or is it the case for all PX-S5/6/7000 that the black keys produce the same clacking noises as before?
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! The PXS5000/6000/7000 all use the exact same keyboard action, so they should be quite consistent across the board. I am surprised to hear that you found the black keys to be clicky. Generally speaking, these PXS models tend to have some of the quietest actions when it comes to key noise.
I would love to hear your impressions about Px-s5000/6000/7000 as a midi controller.
Hi! Thank you for the suggestion! We have had a few people reach out regarding various models and their efficacy as a MIDI controller. We will do our best to tackle this topic in a future video. :)
@@MerriamPianos Nice!!!
I'd like to see a S5000 vs S6000/7000 video. The price step to the two bigger models is quite steep. Do those have better (larger) or more piano samples? Is the action the exact same? I'm only interested in the piano functions and sounds (not the additional voices). The 192 vs. 256 polyphony and simpler speakers are no big deal for me. I got my FP-90X for that. The Casio pianos would be interesting as portable instruments due to their weight and dimensions. If the S5000 doesn't fall behind in terms of sound (line out only) and action, it would be tempting instead of a Kawai MP7SE (or its successor).
Hi there! You can certainly expect that type of comparison video in the near future! We just received our first shipment of PXS5000 and PXS6000 pianos and we received our PXS7000 units a few weeks ago. :)
As for the differences, the PXS7000 comes with the wooden stand triple pedal system, which the other two models do not include. Furthermore, it has more built-in sounds, including more acoustic piano sounds. All three pianos feature the same hybrid wood and resin key action. We will certainly break these differences down in upcoming videos.
Thanks for the reply. So the S5000 doesn't have the same three piano samples as the S7000 (2x Steinway + Bechstein). That's a pity, it would have been a nice very portable package at a reasonable price point then. I don't see myself spending the extra money for the S6000. I'd rather wait for a MP7SE successor around 1500€ then. I think Casio went too far with the pricing of the two top models. We're talking about the price point of a FP-90X or MP11SE with their superior actions. A S7000 without the stand for around 1500€ might convince me to buy another portable piano for gigs. Beyond 2000€, I expect a better action with longer key sticks (which adds bulk and weight again ... I know).
I wish all digital pianos came with an LCD screen. The PX-S5000 does not have an LCD screen. Entry level models from Yamaha, Kawai, and Roland don't have one either. I can buy a $20 mp3 player on Amazon with a color screen, or a $400 Donner DEP-20 with an LCD screen. This is a convenience that should be included in premium brands too. While using piano apps like Smart Pianist (Yamaha), Piano Remote (Kawai), Piano Partner (Roland), and Music Space (Casio) is available, digital piano manufacturers should provide at least a little screen in their basic models.
Personaly I don't like hiding everything in a touch screen. It isn't PWD friendly. Not unless you just need it for reference, and that there are still fissical buttons🎹🎶
It is definitely a bit of a contentious debate at the moment within the digital piano community. Many players share your sentiment for wanting an onboard LCD screen for ease of navigation. With that said, there are a number of players and customers that complain about the presence of an LCD screen for a variety of reasons ranging from aesthetics (this is particularly true when someone wants the closest appearance of an acoustic piano) to distraction. Thankfully, there is a range of models out there for players and customers to choose from in order to satisfy both camps. :)
@@MerriamPianos I prefer the upfront in your face controls of the Roland LX series compared to the cheek-block placement of the Kawai CA series. Also touch screens aren't necessarily the best option. Kawai seems to use an inferior type of touch screen on the CA-99 for example. For performing musicians being able to see the display in poor light is important. Also being able to save set-ups for instant recall is critical when moving from number to number. Stu rarely if ever discusses that, but it's one of the most important aspects of electronic instruments. Another issue: Do strings sustain with the foot pedal or only with a key press? I'm very disappointed that string and pad type voices don't sustain with the foot pedal on the Yamaha DGX. Another issue is cross velocity sensitivity. Never mentioned. The idea of this is the harder the piano is played layered with strings, the less strings your hear, likewise when the instrument is played softer the strings sing out more. This can be very effective with voices that can actually be controlled. Individual voices can be tailored reasonably well on the Yamaha DGX it's just unfortunate they don't sustain with the pedal. But this is something Stu needs to be telling us. He goes into great detail on the texture of key tops, but not something more important like do voices sustain with the pedal. Can you save a set up to memory etc. In many ways Stu's reviews are very superficial, albeit his playing is always excellent and most enjoyable.
and the $849 DGX670 has such a nice color screen
15:47 time for me to take a bathroom break 😁
Does the 5000 fit on the 6000,7000 stand?Otherwise a missed selling opportunity for Casio.
That is a good question! We have not received our first shipment of PXS5000 piano yet to be able to experiment. We received one for demo purposes, but did not have a chance to test it out with the 7000's stand.
They sound different loudness levels, the 5000 sounds a bit louder.
I noticed that when I turn off my Casio CT-S1 and turn it back on after a few seconds, the volume is either ever so slightly louder or ever so slightly quieter, and while it was turned off I didn't touch the volume knob,
so I'm just guessing that something wierd might be going on either with the audio level or possibly with the volume knobs not being precise enough to do test that supposed to be the same loudness, but they aren't the same, despite the fact that the volume knobs are set exactly the same way.
Also I noticed that
when the volume knob is set to max volume
and then I turn it down to 50% volume (from 100%)
it's not the same loudness level as
when the volume knob is set at 0
then turn it up to 50% (from 0%).
And I swear it is exactly the same setting to the millimeter (meaaured it with temporary checkmark too just to be sure).
I know these are not Casio CT-S1 keyboards,
but CT-S1 and these PX-S pianos are relatively new keyboards
compared to my old Casio Privia PX-160,
and interestingly the volume knob on the PX-160 and the audio level loudness seems to work as they supposed to. No volume difference after I turn it off for a few seconds and turn it back on.
And if I set the volume knob from 0% to 50%
will sound actually the same as
setting it from 100% to 50%.
(probably not perfect, but much closer loudness levels that I just don't notice easily like I did with the PX-s1100 and PX-S5000 in this MIDI file comparison.
Great stuff as always, I thought I write here my experience and thought about it,
but I might be totally wrong or simply just forgot about something, I don't know :)
I'm keeping an eye on that 1100, at least my wallet won't starve to death.
Thanks for sharing your experiences and for tuning in! We appreciate it. :)
Given that the PXS1100 and PXS5000 use different actions and sensor systems, it is natural for there to be a slightly different volume (even though the tone engine and sample set is the same) and MIDI velocity output. In my experiences, the PXS5000 is superior in terms of its rendering of a player's dynamics and performance.
In terms of the inconsistent volume of your CTS1. Sometimes, in entry-level models, the quality of componentry (including volume potentiometers) will not be on the same tier as higher end models like the PXS5000/6000/70000. To that point, little deviations and inconsistencies can occur. There are also a number of other factors that could be affecting volume output as well. Hopefully, it is not too big of an issue and you are able to enjoy the CTS1 as it is a great little keyboard that packs some very good value for its price point.
IMHO the volume level coming out of the PX-S5000 is higher than that of the PX-S1100 making it very difficult to make a good judgement. I do believe the volume levels (volume controls) are set the same, but nevertheless the output on the 500 is higher. Perhaps some other audio components inside that make that happen. Anyway. Hard to compare in this way. More volume always makes an instrument sound different more pronounced.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I know we typically always take the direct line-out from the piano at the same level to ensure that the captured audio and comparison is as transparent as possible. With that said, it is possible that there are some subtle tweaks on the tone engine side of the PXS5000 that results in the slightly louder output. Thanks for tuning in! :)
@@MerriamPianos
Thanks for the thought provoking video. This seems to be the least expensive key action with some wood in it. Casio keeps breaking new ground! I think I like the sound too.
You're very welcome! I couldn't agree more! Casio is definitely drawing some lines in the sand within the digital piano market with their recent offerings. Exciting times to say the least! :)
@@MerriamPianos I guess that this is also the lightest portable piano with some wood on board, and the highest end portable piano that doesn't include a screen. It can work on batteries too - what a novelty for a mid-range instrument!
I tried PX-S6000 & PX-S1100 in a local shop with my own phones (K240 Studio) and the sound level was really quiet with Volume full cranked up, no problem with older Privia models or other manufacturers models (Examples, RD-88,ES-520,P-515 ) , there is any parameter to set (not found in the manual) or specific max. headphones impedance to consider? I was thinking about buying PX-S5000 but I have this doubt. C.
I think part of the reason you're not getting optimized volume and fidelity from your K240 headphones is that they have a mismatched impedance from digital pianos. The K240s have a 600 Ohm impedance, but the ideal range for digital piano headphones is 32 to 60 Ohms.
@@MerriamPianos thank you, i will check with better matching phones 👍.
I agree. The output of its headphone amplifier is very low. I use Sennheiser HD600 (I always do). These are high quality headphones.
Somewhat off topic, but have you ever done a video with Dexibell H10?
Hi David! We have not featured the Dexibell H10 at this point, but we always try to tackle as many community-submitted requests as possible and will add it to the list. Thanks for the suggestion!
@@MerriamPianos Thanks. Your demos and comparison videos are appreciated. Dexibell line also includes the H5, which is very close in price to the Roland DP603, which would make it an interesting comparison. Going tom wind up with one of these, I am pretty sure.
What would be the choice for us, intermediate players who would be using it 98% of the time at home listening through the onboard speakers? Would that make a lot of difference?
If you're using the onboard speakers primarily, I would suggest looking at a model with top facing speakers (such as the ES520, ES920, FP60X, FP90X, etc.) as they will provide a much more rewarding sonic experience. :)
The good news is that digitals just get better and better as time passes. Now if there were a great tablet that could display full sized pages of sheet music.
Absolutely! I definitely agree with both sentiments! :)
The problem for me is that the most playable digital piano actions are from ten years ago. The actions seem to have got progressively heavier and more sluggish over the years. The best actions for me are Roland PHA3 and the Yamaha CP1 / CP5 series.
there's been a few Medion 'Akoya' Laptops around a few years ago with detachable 13" or 15.6" (touch)-displays working as independent tablet. Not enough ram/cpu for running big GrandPiano VSTs but works perfectly for music sheets (I have a 15.6"). Look at 2nd hand market
I don't really understand why everyone keeps comparing the 5000 to the 1100 when it costs more than the 3100. Surely the 3100 would be a more reasonable comparison?
You can certainly expect some more comparison videos featuring the PXS5000 in the near future! ;)
People want to know if Casio fixed the lighter black key issues with the PX-S1100/S3100. It does not matter which one as they have the same key action.
Oh dear - the same old story regarding the action. I have the PX-S3100 and I'm amazed by the incredible quality of the piano!
I recently purchased the 3000. Is there much difference between the 3000 and 5000?
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! I have not personally had a chance to test drive the PXS5000 yet, so I cannot personally comment on how it compares against the PXS3000. With that said, you can definitely expect some more comparison videos featuring the PXS5000 in the near future! :)
Does the PX-S5000 have a built in USB audio interface? My Roland FP90X does, so it allows me to connect a USB cable from the Roland to my Microsoft Surface laptop running Pianoteq, which enables me to route the audio from Pianoteq to the Roland's built in sound system. The Pianoteq audio is then heard both thru the Roland speakers as well as any powered speakers connected to the Roland's line outs. Can I do that with the PX-S5000?
Hi there! Unfortunately, it is a little unclear based on Casio's spec sheets. I have read that the PXS5000 has USB audio recording, but I have not personally used this feature, so I can't confirm. With that said, I don't believe it has a complete USB audio interface like the Roland models, which allow you to run VST pianos through the onboard speaker system.
And that is the exact reason I wish Casio would have left the "audio in" jack on the 1100. The irony is that it is included on the 3100 where is it not really needed. The surface pro laptops are perfect for on the road VST and with the "audio in" jack it comes through the instrument's speakers. Plus you have a way to read sheet music in a large format with the surface pro.
So where does the 3000 compare vs the 5000? It's a big jump from the 1100 to the 5000.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! I have not had a chance to play on the Casio PXS5000 myself yet, so I cannot comment on how it compares to the PXS3000 / PXS3100. With that said, you can certainly expect more comparison videos featuring the PXS5000 in the very near future! ;)
It still has ridiculously short pivot points, sad. I returned mine, the heaviness as I play back into the key still gets fatiguing. I'll stick with the Kawai ES series and their great actions and nice SX-EX Piano 1 sample set. The fact that Casio continues with the short pivots tells me that they don't understand pianos like Kawai does.
Every player is a little different and prioritizes different elements when it comes to digital pianos. The most important thing is that you have found an action and sound that you resonates with you! :)
Casio must reconsider and re-organise their product line which looks inattentive at present.
PX-S line should have been stopped at PX-S6000, no more.
6000 has few real time controls 7000 does not have, but have attractive legs.
PX-S7000 looks like a joke, sad for Casio.
How do you like key noise and key bouncing of your Kawai digital pianos with plastic actions. I checked the keys of this piano and many other digital pianos (including Kawai ES120, ES920 and CA49/401). The keys of PX-S5000 are nicely balanced (this is a light action C4 needs static 53g to move) and weighted properly. Its action is better than PX-S1100 action. By the way, I had four PHA-4 action digital pianos, one with with PHA50, one with GHS, one with NWX and Kawai ES110 (terrible action). I tested many digital and acoustic pianos and regularly play on Yamaha grand piano.
Yes but i just can't get the meaning of selling three products with different prices, the px s 1000 the px s 1100 and the px s 5000 with the same identical aspect and only the more rich piano sound or the bluetooth connections as the only differences....why get the px s 5000 when i can get the rd 88 at the same price? I think casio has made to much confusion in it's own market with these products...
Hi! Thanks for tuning in and writing in with your question! The intention of the PXS1100 is to replace the PXS1000. Right now, many retailers will have both available, but, once the PXS1000 sells out everywhere, it will be phased out. Also, the PXS5000 has the new Smart Hammer Hybrid Action, which features wooden side panelling. The PXS1000 is being priced lower than the PXS1100 as retailers attempt to clear them out to make way for the new model and the PXS5000 is priced higher than the PXS1100 due to its superior action. I hope this helps clarify things a bit more! :)
Stu hasn’t corrected that ES120 has upgraded RHC action, not RHC2
Many community members have made the correction in the comments. We will be sure to revise the information in future videos discussing the ES120.
Molto interessante questo confronto diretto fra i due modelli. Mi chiedevo tuttavia come potessero aver migliorato l'azione del tasto quando la lunghezza della leva è simile a prescindere dal materiale composito di plastica e legno del 5000. In ogni caso sonicamente, si sente la differenza ascoltandolo in cuffia già dal pc. Il 5000 suona meglio ed è più arioso. un confronto anche con il nuovo Kawai es120 potrebbe essere molto interessante. In ogni caso le aziende devono lavorare ancora molto sulla rumorosità delle tastiere presenti nei piani digitali. Siamo ancora lontani dai pianoforti acustici con dispositivi di silenziamento dei tasti. Qui il 5000 vince rispetto al 1100. Il prezzo comunque fa un enorme differenza. Il 5000 costa praticamente il doppio del 1100 sia in dollari che in euro. Grazie Stu per la tua competenza ed al prossimo video. Ciao dall'Italia.
You're very welcome! Thank you so much for tuning in and sharing your thoughts! The PXS5000 is certainly an impressive instrument tonally. You can definitely expect some more comparison videos in the future with other models like the ES120. Thanks again and all the best! :)
Io non riesco a capire però come con queste differenze Casio possa aver messo in commercio questi modelli (che eccezion fatta per il 7000 e in parte il 6000 hanno un'estetica identica) con questa differenza di prezzo così grande. Alle stesse cifre di px s 5000 compri Rd 88, alla stessa cifra dell' s 6000 prendi uno cp73 e alle stesse cifre di s 7000 prendi macchine come l'YC o l'Rd 2000...perché provare a mettersi in fasce di prezzo simili quando non c'è storia, e questo è palese per quello che viene offerto dai competitors...ma anche un grand stage di korg che non mi sembra uno strumento per cui impazzire offre di più sia come qualità sonora sia come action sia e soprattutto come qualità sonora su un palco. Casio ha fatto ottime cose in determinate fasce di prezzo producendo strumenti che offrivano cmq delle prestazioni medie (in alcuni casi eccellenti come px 5s) ad un prezzo abbordabile e che giustificava determinate mancanze...ma alle cifre per cui ha lanciato la nuova serie per me è naturale preferire rd 88 cp 73 o 88 oppure yc 73 o 88...e non dimentichiamoci di numa x piano gt che consente editing di molte caratteristiche del piano...casio avrà sicuramente migliorato le macchine ma non è un miglioramento tale da giustificare il prezzo che ha dato.
The burr that sound quality itself is
inferiority Is it the difference of
the amplifier？
(i'm sorry Ican't speak English well🙏)
Iam japanese
Hi! The internal speaker/amp system definitely factors into the equation when comparing the overall musical experience a digital piano provides.
Can the 5000 layer sounds?
Yup! The Casio PXS5000 has both a layer and split mode. :)
@@MerriamPianos Is the Users Guide available online?
No EQ???? 😲 I still recommend the old PX5S ...you can modulate the sound to your ears. Every other digital piano sounds death in comparision. I try every new stage piano but they do not make it.. Great playing, Stu!
Thanks for tuning in! The important thing is that you've found a digital piano that you connect and resonate with! Thanks again and all the best! :)
Sincerely, Casio Grand sound has improved since... ;) But looking at the entire package, PX5S is a powerhouse (have one, love it) and 'in a band' the clear PX5S Grand sounds stronger than a lot of superior DPs ;)
Listening to this comparison of these two models, I find there's no an evident difference of sound quality both for acoustic grand piano sample and electric piano Rhodes one.... At the same level.... The quality of keyboard, instead, will be surely higher in the pxs5000!!!!
The big differentiator is certainly the action/keyboard. Both of these models are wonderful pianos for their respective price points though. :)
I love your demos!! I’ve just never been a fan of roland or casio.I believe casio is great for worship, or if your learning and working your way up the latter. Just never makes sense on why kawai does not put demos in some models. Some folks just like to hear them.i am a KAWAI/Nord guy
Justin, with an exception of the ES110, Kawai actions have a good reputation, and an identifiable sound, so I can see where you're coming from. And Nord is arguably the favourite brand for stage pianos. The two brands even share at least one Kawai action.
But recent portable Kawai models show a slight change of direction, with a lower carry weight and a lighter feel, and I wonder whether you like them as much. Nothing is written in stone, so manufacturers are free to change direction, encouraging some customers and disappointing others. Accordingly it's best to keep looking around, and not presume that any one manufacturer will always be the best for you.
Most of my DPs have been Yamaha, so I guess that makes me a Yamaha fan, but I'm perfectly ready to buy Casio, Roland, Kawai or a lesser-known brand if it offers me what I need at the time.
Thank you for tuning in and supporting our channel and sharing your insights! Every player will have their own tonal preferences and, as you've rightfully pointed out, it also has to do with the context in which a piano will be used in. :)
@@Zoco101 i own a higher end kawai mp7 se and it makes me happier than ever and it plays like a dream. There are so many conspiracies about the rubber paddings on certian BRANDS that use RH3 where people say they wear out after a while i almost wish i knew what @marriammusic felt about that theory. I have not had any pads wear out on the RH3 action at all
@@Justin_collier I'm very impessed by the MP-7SE. As I mentioned elsewhere, the ES-920 has the same RH3 action in theory, but it felt firmer (to me) on the MP7-SE when I tried them both.
Differences between 1100 and cdp s360
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! They are quite different in virtually every category. They use completely different actions, tone engines, and speaker systems. :)
You guys make all these very informative videos and talk for hours. it would be nice to talk on one video but give us the chance to hear these dam machines. To be able to listen to them and maybe someone would buy one right away. Thus two videos. To much talk and short little tunes. Give us a Liberace of the sounds on the keyboards.. If ya cant do that..then let people read the exciting manuals and fall asleep just like this video, however, hats off to the effort and work to produce something. The commercial I saw today on TH-cam with the Privia S5000 clarity of souinds was amazing. Thank you Casio.
Hi there! We time stamp the videos in order for viewers to navigate to the sections they are most interested in. While some people simply want to hear the sounds, there are many people that live too far away from showrooms to be able to test the instruments for themselves. That is why Stu tries to be as thorough as possible in his descriptions of details like how the action feels or how the piano's onboard speakers sound.
I disagree. I much more prefer commentary from Stu than sound comparisons. The sounds of acoustic pianos always sound almost the same on my iPhone.
I think they should design a new line from scratch, naming different ( Privia PX-L may be? or a complete different name ) by designing deeper cabinet for a more piano like action. Because the dimension of the current PX-S series means a substantial limit for further development of a pro line..
Casio should consider what Roland did with RD2000 and RD88 or FPX90 and FPX30.
For instance, why a person would want to pay extra money for PX-S7000 rather than getting PX-S6000. To me, 6000 looks and sounds better than 7000. I think the PX-S top line model should be 6000, no further.
So again, Casio has to create a new line piano along with deeper cabinet for a more pro hammer action to ask for more money. There should be another series to fill the gap between PX-S Privia and GP Celviano line.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! Thanks for writing in! Casio does have a line that sits between the PX and GP series, which is the AP series. In terms of a redesign, it is not likely to happen anytime soon given the fact that Casio just expanded the PXS line. While it is a matter of preference of course, the new Casio PXS models, especially the PXS7000 in the mustard yellow finish, have been immensely popular. Some people have issues with the action, but there are many players who simply love it or value the portability of the design very highly. :)
@@MerriamPianos
Hi Brent.
I was actually trying to say that, PX-S line has some limits for further development due to dimensions so were Casio to produce a different line for more pro action, that would be great.
I know AP line but it is not so popular as Yamaha CLP or Kawai CN series these days. It used to be when released, but not any longer... It is also not portable. There should be something similar to PX-5S or PX 560M.
I might be wrong anyway, just wanted to share what had come to my mind. Cheers :)
Same piano sampled just more layers and better engine like the difference between the kawai regular engine compere to the xl.
For sure! That is a very good point. The level of detail is quite impressive. :)
I commented on another video of yours about prices and what to compare. The 1100 is 550€ and the 5000 is 1150€. So from a German pricing view these two are far apart…
And compared to other brands: FP-60x is 1140€, FP-30X is 620€, ES520 about 920€ and ES920 is 1450€.
So I guess what I’m trying to say is that you could include a part about price differences in your reviews where you give an opinion about equivalents. Because so far I have the impression that the px-s5000 is „equivalent“ to a FP-30x, es120 or p125, but costs 500€ more than the other 3 I mentioned.
Thanks for tuning in! Unfortunately, the price gap between certain models are drastically different in different markets. That is one of the reason we do not tend to focus too much on discussing prices as we have a very large community of piano enthusiasts from all over the world. :)
This market price difference is a bit annoying, though... Many instruments measured against each other in e.g. the US and then I check the prices in Finland / Thomann and see a much wider price difference (with a general increase in prices for all brands)... suddenly all said about the instruments weights different...
But, I think, Stu tries to point out many use case scenarios and pick several instruments for comparison ( based on meaningful differences) in those situations. So one can individually decide if the price difference vs upgrade worth it...
Saying prices would not help that much, because for one, €500 difference is not that much, for others €100 more is a deal breaker... or some try to buy the cheapest possible option they can get away with... While others buy the 3rd digital piano for fun or just to have it in case they occasionally cannot use their acoustic... Can't cater to all needs at once.
Unfortunately on both the mid range sounds "plastic", that happens on the FP30X too. I have an almost 20 years old Yamaha P60 and a new Casio CT-S500 and I'm really struggling to find a digital piano that combines both of this instruments. The P60 is old technology, but has a lot of soul and response on the tone and the amazing GH action, present on premium Clavinovas. The CT-S500 is truly amazing, portable, the piano sound is much better (AIX engine) than on those PSX models, it has 3 configurable knobs and etc. If Casio could launch a CT-S500 with 88 hammer action and better polyphony, it would be a killer option!!!
This is the CT-S500: th-cam.com/video/PKVoxlQw6hE/w-d-xo.htmlsi=GkDcWZx1bQDDb3uS
Hi! Brent here! It comes down to a matter of personal preference and taste of course. Everyone will gravitate towards a different touch and tone. There is also the factor of familiarity. Whatever we get used to will tend to be the thing we naturally gravitate towards. For this reason, I still find myself playing my very first upright piano frequently despite having two other pianos that are much more expensive/higher quality.
are you sure the 5000 wasn't just set to louder?
I entered the 3 recordings (5000, then 1100, then 5000) in an audio software. The program shows that the PX-S1100 was recorded at 1.5 decibels quieter than the PX-S5000. The second recording of the PX-S5000 shows an average of 2.5 decibels louder than the PX-S1100. So, to me, the answer is: yes, the PX-S5000 was set to be louder. While 1.5-2.5 decibels is a small increment, humans can detect it and will make audio judgements based on loudness settings. I saw a video of a Yamaha P45 vs Alesis Prestige in another channel with the same problem, where the Alesis Prestige was set 8 decibels louder, giving the impression of being "better". I also saw an audiophile channel trying to prove that a super expensive cable increased clarity over a cheaper cable interconnect, and let the guy know he had increased the decibel difference by 1.5 decibels. He admitted that it was the case, that it was an accident and not intentional, but that invalidated the claim regarding the cable superiority, at least under the conditions used in the comparison.
Hi Rosie! As Instrumental Covers kindly and thoroughly explained, there does appear to be a slightly higher output signal from the PXS5000 compared to the PXS1100. Thanks for tuning in! :)
5000 has a stronger headphone output comparing 1100.
Well for $1200 I'm sure you can get something better that's how much I bought by RD88 for not it's going for more but if I would ever price estimate the Casio PX-5000 it's more of a $700-$800 Piano.
Every customer is a little different and have different preferences when it comes to tone and touch. The most important thing is to find a playing experience that you connect with at your specific price point. :)
@@MerriamPianos I agree but my makn focus now is to get the Kawai MP7se it’s one of the best for the price
Ordered both, sending both back. Action is so light, no resistance at all, it's not close to piano action.
It is definitely a lighter piano action than say the Roland PHA4 or PHA50. It all comes down to a matter of preference ultimately. Some players prefer a lighter action, particularly for gigging in which they will be switching between piano sounds and other instruments like strings, electric pianos, organs, and synths. I hope you a find a piano action that you connect with! Thanks for tuning in and happy playing! :)
I play Yamaha grand piano regularly and the action of it is also light - ~50g for C4
How i buy kawai piano in india without online.....❓❓❔❔
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! I am not sure if there are any Kawai dealers in India, but you can certainly check Kawai's global website to find the closest dealer to you.
22:17 Customer: Stu, why is this piano 50% off?
Stu: oh I played this piano too hard... the keys are ruined
The keys and action seemed to hold up quite well! It was a good little durability test as well as showcasing the key noise of the action. ;)
Why do you remind my of actor Edward Norton?😉
I can totally see that! I will be sure to pass that comparison along to Stu. :)
the new one is always
drop dead gorgeous fabulous God like.
and a few years go by and
and the old God gets magically transformed into dustbin material.
only to be replaced by the new God
< 5000 < 6000 < 7000
Haha true! New models almost always keep coming out🎹🎶
There seems to be no expiration date on innovation within the digital piano industry at this time, which is an exciting prospect! It is very cool to witness digital pianos creep closer and closer to capturing the nuances and details of an acoustic piano with each new model. :)
@Konstantin Ridaya 🤣
@Konstantin Ridaya
Your god's name is not God. That's his job description. There are several names for the various gods in the bible. You should check it out sometimes.
Digital piano reviews and comments belong to a category of knowledge/information that I am trying to label adequately. They are not theorems, they are not scientific statements. They seem to be, at least partially, "value-impregnated factual claims", which means that theoretical assumptions and convictions influence observations. A value-impregnated factual judgement is a judgement about fact(s) that is influenced by values. The general idea is that a factual judgement is value-impregnated if the person making it would not have made it, or would not have stressed its relevance to the same degree, if the person was not influenced by her values. Factual claims may be affected by our value judgements, so that we, for instance, believe that something is the case because we want it to be the case or find it desirable that it would be the case. If we are not aware of the possibility of such value-impregnated factual judgements, we may think that we are more objective. Value-impregnated factual claims could be the result of previous personal experiences or professional relationships with certain brands.
There is also the issue of "falsifiability", meaning the capacity of being proven wrong, being refutable. Many statements made in the digital piano world are not refutable. But not being falsifiable doesn't automatically mean they are true. They could also be false statements that can't be disproved. This adds another layer of difficulty in accessing knowledge.
It seems to me that it is not possible to escape this state of ambiguity, subjectivity, and value-impregnated impressions/assessments of digital pianos.
This state of affairs apply to any digital piano review/comment, independent of the brand or the person making the review/comment.
This is not to say that there is zero objectivity in some statements (for example, when citing specifications about dimensions, weight, number of sounds, number of speakers, etc). But as soon as the evaluative process starts, it seems impossible to escape this relative state of affairs.
Hi! Brent from Merriam Music here! I certainly agree with your notion and think that it is largely inescapable within the realm of musical instrument assessments in general...or...even more so...music as a whole. Art and, more specifically, music is a highly subjective field in which value or beauty is within the senses of the beholder. Given the inseparable affinity between instruments and their use to create, express and channel artistic ideas, the notion of being able to make any type of assessment absolutely objective is an impossible. But, then again, why would we want to? One of the beautiful things about existence is the capacity for so many unique perspectives and thoughts simultaneously. We learn and grow through exposure to these differing opinions and perspectives, which is really at the core of what we try to do with our video reviews. :)
@@MerriamPianos Hi Brent! Thank you for sharing your feedback :)
Got to use headphones to experience the difference? Which I don't use at all 🥵
Not everyone will require the use of headphones when practicing piano, but that's okay! :)
The "music experts" = They sound different each other.
The "electronic manufacturer" = They use the same electronic sound circuit inside.
The public = They both sound the same, let's buy the cheapest one!.
It all comes down to subjectivity of course. With that said, keep in mind that there is a psychoacoustic aspect to piano playing. Even when the tone engines are the exact same, a different action/sensor system in conjunction with the same tone engine can yield a very different perceived musical experience as the action can have an impact on the way the sonic elements react.
@@MerriamPianos Ok, got it.
Same Sample. Maybe slitly deference on the amount of sample layers that's all. Same Piano Exactly.
Thanks so much for tuning in and sharing your thoughts! :)
Sorry but the piano samples sound exactly as artificial and weak as a $500 Casio PX-300 from 2003 on this one too. Such a shame because the hardware seems to be up there.
For pianists and musicians, beauty is in the ears of the beholder. Every player will have their own personal preferences when it comes to tone and touch.
They both sound the same.
They have the same core piano sound. The difference here is the action.
Thanks for your insights.
I just assumed it was measurably better because of the price. I also assumed that it wouldn’t be worth upgrading from my PX-560. It may be visually nice to look at and have better tones but the PX-560 is still a better value for me. $2,500 buys a lot of musical kit.
You're very welcome! Thank you for tuning in and supporting the channel! :)