This CGC Giant Size X-Men #1 9.9 Is NOT REAL

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ต.ค. 2024
  • Please SUBSCRIBE, TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS, LIKE, & SHARE. It is much appreciated! Thank you!
    Instagram:
    / loveangelesmusic
    Email:
    David@CollectorsComics.com
    Website:
    www.CollectorsComics.com
    My Music:
    Spotify:
    open.spotify.c...
    Apple:
    itunes.apple.c...
    TH-cam:
    / loveangelesmusic
    Sponsors:
    Ebay Affiliate Link :
    ebay.us/jEDf61
    When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

ความคิดเห็น • 273

  • @electrontransferconduit657
    @electrontransferconduit657 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    This is the rant we all have in our brains when a perfect book comes back a 9.8.

  • @andresperez5430
    @andresperez5430 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Spot on! Especially when you break down why CGC will eventually not survive with its current business model.

  • @mestizo3113
    @mestizo3113 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    If the CGC video of how they determine a 9.9 and 10, then this Giant Size X-Men is not a legit 9.9. It's just proof of what CGC is planning to do to the market. It's very disappointing.

    • @ComicBookInvestments
      @ComicBookInvestments  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yup. Sad

    • @cybergrindin
      @cybergrindin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s not a 9.9.. it had color rub

    • @kryptoniterocks8245
      @kryptoniterocks8245 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cgc are a bunch of scum bags and if anyone submits their book starts to them is just supporting there scam on how they do business and it’s all about manipulating the hobby prices..

    • @bandoogiemanz
      @bandoogiemanz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Even that video is totally suspect. So because the person submitted 70 books(or maybe it was more can't remember) that means there has to be some 9.9s and 10.0s in there? So because I only submit 10books, I have no shot at a grade higher than 9.8? Sh*t is very suspect. If they introduce 9.9 pre-screen and they start flooding the market with them, all the graded market values are going to decline. 9.8s would become the new 9.6s and so on.

  • @leerogers5318
    @leerogers5318 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Finally, it's refreshing to see someone with the courage and integrity to openly criticize CGC for its shortcomings as a business. I've noticed numerous TH-cam personalities acting as mere shills, hyping up CGC as if it will effortlessly dominate the market and eliminate all competition. It's nothing but a facade. I eagerly anticipate the day they are forced to face reality. From now on, I refuse to send any more books to CGC, period.

    • @tensixtythreecomics
      @tensixtythreecomics 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes but until we start to see videos selling cbcs slabs then it’s all talk. Enjoyable, satisfying talk but still talk

    • @kryptoniterocks8245
      @kryptoniterocks8245 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When you criticise CGC and yet still submit to them says what kind of character you have. I hate them and what they do and yet il keep submitting because I get more money from that label hahaha.. There is options like CBCS but yet nah I like going to the wolf in sheep’s clothing still

    • @AcidicJO
      @AcidicJO 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tensixtythreecomicsLast year was the first time I sent a couple autographed books to CBCS and when they came back I realized how much superior their cases are. The look and feel is amazing and superior to CGC.

    • @tensixtythreecomics
      @tensixtythreecomics 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AcidicJOyeah I did the same. Sent 19 books and some magazines. When you hold the cases you can feel they seem sturdier. I just wonder how they will answer this 9.9 prescreen. Clearly cgc/cbcs and others have been limiting grades to mainly 9.8 as a top grade. It’s easy look at all books graded and get a percentage of 9.9 and of 10s and compare that in a year. My guess is 10 X higher numbers.

    • @JTMaster
      @JTMaster 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@AcidicJO Quality case, sure, but their labels are ugly as sin.

  • @Drifter2025
    @Drifter2025 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    You're absolutely correct on this. CGC is just trying to survive without changing their business plan.

  • @jojilos8789
    @jojilos8789 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    If that’s a 9.9 then every brand new comic should get a 9.9 - 10

    • @ComicBookInvestments
      @ComicBookInvestments  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Exactly

    • @StarTrooper
      @StarTrooper 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ComicBookInvestments It always bugged me when a perfectly good brand new mint comic would get graded in 9.8

    • @WadeNslade
      @WadeNslade 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cgc needs to control the census

    • @rammisalami
      @rammisalami 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WadeNsladeoh they do, just not in the good moral business sense you are talking about.

  • @davidsamuelson2089
    @davidsamuelson2089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    BUT this GSMN isn’t even a 9.8 candidate. You can easily spot spine issues, soft corners, smashed spine & color rub. And that’s on a 10 second look.

  • @cowbelltv4865
    @cowbelltv4865 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I applaud you once again for your honesty and POV. For a guy who sells slabbed books you could just say, “this is great!” to encourage sales and grading.

  • @GoodDeal2013
    @GoodDeal2013 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    My comic books will be sent to CBCS from this point forward. I
    will no longer be sending my comic books to CGC. I've been having a terrible experience with them overdue grading times and blowing me off as a customer..

  • @davebastow10
    @davebastow10 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The CGC grading score is becoming the modern day Emperor's New Clothes

  • @txmoney
    @txmoney 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Well done! You covered ALL the ramifications, motivations, and reasonings. This is how business decision makers operate across ALL industries.
    At the end of the day, it’s about “fiduciary responsibility”. That means, you can throw out any semblance of integrity. Businesses are amoral entities. It is up to the consumer to draw a line on how far a company can go before their business practices become “unacceptable”.

  • @Supertomscustoms
    @Supertomscustoms 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    There’s another 9.8 in that same upcoming auction with tanning. They just tossed whatever sliver of integrity they had out the window.

    • @davidsamuelson2089
      @davidsamuelson2089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It’s called dealer grading. Dealers & auction houses have been getting gift grades from the dawn of CGC.

    • @angelvalle9963
      @angelvalle9963 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@davidsamuelson2089😉💪

    • @mikedamore4739
      @mikedamore4739 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      that 9.8 was from the same submission there is also an ASM 129 9.6 with multiple spine ticks a corner crunch and 2 small chips in auction also from the same submission.

  • @andrehanderson
    @andrehanderson 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    The problem with this tactic by CGC is that 9.9s will no longer command the same kind of ridiculous prices once there are more of them.

    • @ComicBookInvestments
      @ComicBookInvestments  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Ya but they don’t care. They are in the business to stay in business lolu

    • @bandoogiemanz
      @bandoogiemanz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're looking at volume.

    • @gregorysugden1982
      @gregorysugden1982 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They don't care. They are looking at crack and resubmit fees.

  • @Kirok2005
    @Kirok2005 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Regarding your comment toward the end of the videos about CGC encouraging resubmissions by occasionally suppressing VERY strong books from highest grade...I've suspected that for a while.
    I have an example for you...not as high-dollar as the GSXM #1 example, but here you go. About 8 years ago, I submitted my ASM #252, which I had purchased brand new, off the shelf at my comic shop where I went to college. (I had been separated from my collection for 25 years during my military career.) I'm not a professional grader, but I am an experienced grader, with about 300 submissions from my personal collection under my belt, and I had always recorded my "predictions" in Excel. Even then (circa 2016), my books would come back at my predicted grade or higher 80% of the time. Anyway, this book looked DEAD MINT. I said to myself, "this comic is so perfect, I don't even want to risk a CCS press." Lo and behold, it comes back a 9.6 with a single grader note stating "stacking bend." BS. The books was one of the easiest lay-up 9.8s I'd ever sent. Not even borderline. So I grudgingly resubmitted thru CCS, and sure enough, it came back a 9.8 and looked EXACTLY the same. I know, a single data point, and only my eyes (and my track record) as basis for my suspicions. Well, they got their $12.00 pressing fee plus all the resubmit fees.
    I just wish I didn't love slabs so much --- I really like how they present a book, and I think authentication (for restoral) is still a valuable service.

    • @etrx87
      @etrx87 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yep from my experience that CCS 'pressing' for the in-house signings is more like a tax to keep the grade. The books always look the same

  • @CarandRacer
    @CarandRacer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I am so happy you exist on the internet. Your feedback is backed up by genuine experience and it is obvious you know your craft. This is literally scam level nonsense by CGC and their corporate owners. Greed. I do think this will backfire for them however and cause a revolt when those with higher grade books watch their values plummet - and I don't mean just 9.8 book owners. All the 9's will plummet in value. Only the lower tier CGC grades will be somewhat unaffected. This said, I am a pragmatic investor in my books and I will follow where the money goes - and CGC knows that many will do the same. What I think CGC may not know is that this could cause CBCS to become the more trusted certifier of books - and relegate CGC into a a surprise runner-up status that CBCS has been in for so long. I actually trust CBCS more today - simply because of what CGC is doing with this 9.9 money grab.

  • @tikertiker2
    @tikertiker2 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    With the uncertainty of the 9.9 market, I don’t think this book will sell for 250-500k. If the 9.8 is 22-25k currently, I think this 9.9 will finish at 80-125k

    • @danalvin1184
      @danalvin1184 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Especially when anyone with even a modicum of grading acumen would notice the conspicuous color breaking on the cover & realize the sliding scale is broken (if it ever worked at all)

    • @DanSchawbel
      @DanSchawbel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think it will go for $250,000

    • @kevinkelly4436
      @kevinkelly4436 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It sold for $170,000

  • @KimNguyen-zm7gi
    @KimNguyen-zm7gi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I think you just nailed it. So you are telling me that a comic book grading service is manipulating the market? Have to agree with you. The service is one and done. Thank you for your content. Love your ranting. It makes sense.

  • @luke-space
    @luke-space 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Aren’t we all subbing our books back every 5yrs to CGC to get the acid paper changed out!! Dam I thought we were all doing this 😂😂😂

  • @pbales8951
    @pbales8951 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We usually get a rant in the middle of a comic viewing. This time, we got full-on rant. Nice!

  • @michaelsharkey4255
    @michaelsharkey4255 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Comic Connect and Heritage have a lot of pull in the market so we can read between the lines on this

    • @DanSchawbel
      @DanSchawbel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Bingo

  • @davidsamuelson2089
    @davidsamuelson2089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    CGC will do the 9.9 prescreen. Asshat Nelson already sold as much that they’ll be doing that & charging more for the review service b/c it will take them more time to examine the books.

  • @GoodDeal2013
    @GoodDeal2013 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Send your books to CBCS 🙂

  • @goldenarm80
    @goldenarm80 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    First off, you put out very good content and I appreciate the breakdowns and your opinions on these type of subjects. Secondly, just wow…. CGC is not going to like your show. This has to be one of the best breakdowns of how CGC has the entire comic book world ….. essentially by their throats. The fact that you can break this down and give us this information. Amazing job brother! Keep up the good work.

  • @StarTrooper
    @StarTrooper 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I never understood why some of the most perfect comic books came back 9.8. It was like they were afraid to give a 9.9 let alone a 10. I think they finally realized that. Plus now they're going to make a fortune with the 9.8s coming in for regrading. Especially the people that have access to lots of 1970s 9.8's. Those people are going to be submitting like crazy searching for the gold mine. A lot of these big time comic shops that have these type of issues will be doing it. The timing is perfect it gets everyone's mind off the scandals that are going on with C G C. I think their business was in trouble from these scandals too. It sure made me reevaluate how many books I want to submit.

    • @JTMaster
      @JTMaster 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I sent in a rare variant of Street Fighter VI #0. I sent in two copies. Never took them out of the bag and board they came in straight from Udon. One looked literally perfect with not a single flaw, not even with the corners. Came back a 9.8. And the other looked almost as perfect, 9.6. Kinda infuriating.

  • @michaelalmanza2046
    @michaelalmanza2046 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If you wanted your mattress store to fail, naming it "SleepLess" would definitely be a good start. But, it would get you listed in the phone book before "SleepMore".

    • @danalvin1184
      @danalvin1184 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "MATTRESS TRAIN" STILL HAS ME ROLLING LOL LOL 8-D

    • @michaelalmanza2046
      @michaelalmanza2046 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@danalvin1184I missed that one!! Had to go back and hear it. Lol

  • @StephenCofMD
    @StephenCofMD 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Perhaps someone has done this before, but I would like to see someone take a book with very specific defects, send it to CGC and get a grade, crack it, send it to CBCS see what grade it gets, crack it, send it to CGC, and then repeat the process one more time and send it to CBCS.
    Assuming the book doesn't receive any additional damage during the process, it would be interesting to see a test case for consistency in grading between the two companies.

  • @furbl4345
    @furbl4345 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Whoever owns the few 9.9's should consider selling now cause once the floodgate of 9.9's opens, the value will adjust based on supplies.

    • @bandoogiemanz
      @bandoogiemanz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A floodgate of 9.9s will devalue all 9.9s and every lower grade as well.

    • @furbl4345
      @furbl4345 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@bandoogiemanz Very true, but 9.9's will get the biggest hit cause they've been valued so high due to their rarity and the valuation gap between a 9.9 and 9.8 is much bigger than a 9.8 and 9.6 and so on. Any books with a grading below 9 should be okay I think.

  • @vendora1
    @vendora1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    100% spot on with your analysis this is why i said grading is a scam

  • @ChienandKun
    @ChienandKun 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    'All the books that are worth graded will eventually be graded'...this isn't a static number though, especially with movie tie ins (worth it or not). For example, I don't think the 1st Metamorpho was on anyone's list until he was cast. Random appearances of characters spike buying and then grading of those related books (that no one was thinking about until then). So, what is worth grading changes week from week. Usually these books aren't really worth grading after their movie appearance though (see Him/Warlock).

  • @skagwaycomics7337
    @skagwaycomics7337 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love your rants man, totally agree and keep up the good work!

  • @cardio1campbell840
    @cardio1campbell840 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Dave, the CGC model was bad for the customer from day one (paying a % instead of a flat fee for grading). A flat fee, no matter how old the book is, fixes everything!

    • @danalvin1184
      @danalvin1184 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      kind of a textbook conflict of interest sheesh

  • @The9.9Newsstand
    @The9.9Newsstand 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    99% of what was said in this video needs to be heard by 99 times more people than have viewed it so far.
    2.6K at the time of this comment.
    Very important video.
    This video should’ve gone viral.

  • @thechurn4766
    @thechurn4766 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It is a self limiting industry, especially when you consider the modern comic industry is contracting. Eventually they will run out of books to grade. There is clearly a color rub to the left of Nightcrawlers hip over where the staple sits. To justify this as a 9.9 this staple bump/rub must now be classified as a "production" error.

  • @GTSComics
    @GTSComics 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is so true. After the 're-holder' scandal all of a sudden CGC pre-screens for 9.9's and they are popping up all over the place. Total bait and switch, smoke and mirrors.

  • @philipfletcher4867
    @philipfletcher4867 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Did you get a close look at the back cover that's why I think it should not be even a 9.8, unless the camera image is flawed the back cover is dirty near the spine. The front cover could be a gem mint 10 but the back should be at the best a 9.6

  • @MrJsv650
    @MrJsv650 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😂 the mattress story had me laughing, no one is loyal to their mattress company 😂😂

  • @Ricky-j5k
    @Ricky-j5k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video Dave! Interesting to know what exactly is considered acceptable now as a 9.9 grade. Does CGC have that new criteria published and does it mean our 9.6s are the new 9.8s? It’s anyone’s guess I suppose.
    Thanks for sharing!

  • @superneilcomics8196
    @superneilcomics8196 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I appreciate this video David.

  • @Dragomo-David
    @Dragomo-David 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    David is the man you tell them how it is and they hate that that’s why I loved your show but everything that goes up. Come down you’re right thank you for the video.

  • @Kurenai1819
    @Kurenai1819 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You are right-on.👍🏼

  • @poolne1500
    @poolne1500 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    At one time, I was thinking of acquiring signature 9.8s of a couple of nice books. Now, there's no way I want to bet on 9.8s maintaining their current values.

    • @DanSchawbel
      @DanSchawbel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is why I’m selling all my 9.8’s. 9.9’s are unenviable so I don’t want to lose money.

    • @bandoogiemanz
      @bandoogiemanz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@DanSchawbelI was thinking this will happen but I hadnt considered my few signature series books. I may have to seriously consider letting them go.

    • @CollectorsFix
      @CollectorsFix 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Does the 9.9 prescreen mean that only those who pay for the service will get 9.9s or 10.0s or are they now going to accurately grade all books regardless?

  • @dennismcmahan632
    @dennismcmahan632 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Definitely can see your point.

  • @jiccojicco
    @jiccojicco 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    At this rate, they might as well raise the ceiling to 10.2, 10.4....lol

  • @Supertomscustoms
    @Supertomscustoms 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’d argue that even at $25, the 3 mins they actually handle the book they’re still probably making a profit. That recent video I think he graded 400 new books and I bet it took him less than an hour.

    • @vorazi08
      @vorazi08 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That was comparison grading. I would think that would be a faster process than one by itself. Only a guess though.

  • @ho9439
    @ho9439 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is your best video to this date imo

  • @oliverortiz5226
    @oliverortiz5226 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are on point with your opinions. This whole 9.9 pre-screening is very suspicious. And now the 9.8, which we all just accepted as the best grade will be devalued or not as desired as a 9.9. CGC should not have ever charged a percentage of the FMV of expensive books because it can be viewed that a grade for a book can be affected due to the potential extra profits for CGC. A flat rate for all books to keep things on the up and up. Now I understand why so many people are moving away or cutting back on grading books. If you want to see that 9.9 Giant-size X-Men you can see a great analysis of the actual book @Automatic Comics. Thanks for making this video.

  • @kevinhurt5331
    @kevinhurt5331 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You’re 100% correct I was telling my lcs this exact same thing he literally thinks I’m crazy. Every bad thing that happens in cards comics always follows the exact same path it never fails.

  • @mythirdlife101
    @mythirdlife101 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Anyone that has made more than a couple submissions to CGC has been left scratching their head trying to figure out how a perfect looking book received the same or lower grade than an obviously flawed book, not to mention the times that a book sent in flawless condition comes back with a mysterious corner crunch.

  • @edduran2571
    @edduran2571 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That’s why I watch you and few others Dave…you give honest opinion. Most you tube influencers get kick backs from CGC, Go collect and short box and tell comic collects everything is all good 😅

    • @ComicBookInvestments
      @ComicBookInvestments  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ya I can’t help it 😂 I just say what’s on my mind

  • @brychology
    @brychology 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Come for the info, stay for the rants!!! I am slowly losing confidence in CGC for sure.

  • @rogera616
    @rogera616 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are exactly right, CGC needs to generate more revenue because Modern books are not enough. The reholder scandal has slowed down their revenue streams so much that they decided to do this 9.9 thing now. That’s why Matt Nelson did the interview with the 9.9 Newsstand to get this going. Blackrock has him by the balls and he has to keep that revenue high or they will get rid of him.

  • @breakbeatz309
    @breakbeatz309 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If CGC allows resubmitting slabbed 9.8s for a chance to get an upgrade without any downside risk, that’s great. They make lots of money and we can try to upgrade our books if we want. The problem is that they are also changing their grading standards to further incentivize resubmitting. This GSX 1 is obviously NOT a 9.8 under the standards we used to know.

  • @kadett_6889
    @kadett_6889 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good Rant, good point. Sent 9.6's look like 9.8's they came back 9.2 , 9.. these were big books.

  • @timmarshall2062
    @timmarshall2062 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    you are right on you have seen a ton of books so you know what your talking about

  • @Whalewraith
    @Whalewraith 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As for world wide recognition of comic characters i would say there are only 5 A listers Superman, Spiderman,Batman,Wolverine and Hulk.
    Substantially more B tiers like Wonder Woman and probably Iron Man (but only because of RDJ). In fact someone had a completle melt down at me when i suggested Stark was a C list hero before the movies. Actualy C list isnt so bad i would define them as capable of carrying a book but unknown to the general public.
    I remember last year a girl at work asking me what i was doing at the weekend and i said i was off to see the new Ant man movie. She thought i was winding her up that there could actually be a hero called Ant Man. Eventually had to pull up youTube and the trailer. Point is all that Avengers End game hype and stuff and it still hadn't raised the profile of a bunch of these heroes enough for a Norm to have even heard of them.

  • @johnsherwood3586
    @johnsherwood3586 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I absolutely agree!!100 %

  • @donaldvonglitchenberger4108
    @donaldvonglitchenberger4108 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    you’ll never see brys comics go on rants like this cause after all he’s gotta feed his family

    • @mikedamore4739
      @mikedamore4739 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He actually just did a video talking about it and he does say CGC is in the wrong.

  • @rammisalami
    @rammisalami 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was hilariously timed! It’s almost like CGC is doing this just to spite you for saying there weren’t a butt ton of Mint keys waiting to get graded. We all know how CGC rolls when it comes to market manipulation so this wouldn’t be new.

  • @lifegood3322
    @lifegood3322 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Cgc might be surprised! I'm over them really and if I just have to grade something I'll probably use cbcs!

  • @Chris-es3wf
    @Chris-es3wf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    A lot of salty comments. I graded that book at least a 13.0 so 9.9 seems pretty harsh. 🤓

  • @psychedeliccomics
    @psychedeliccomics 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That is an interesting argument: As you mentioned, all the Big Big books are already graded and no more of them exists RAW. They are also not worth cracking to re-submit due to the cost.

  • @jarredsmith9187
    @jarredsmith9187 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You got a point Dave, once all the good books are graded that's it but there will be reholder's for cracked cases. I got nothing but keys issues and will get some of my big books graded one day but I have always looked at grading as a scam cause it's nothing but a money thing that's it.

  • @michaelparker9046
    @michaelparker9046 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did you know even in the 70's people said, "this modern stuff will never be worth what the older stuff is worth?" My opinion is there will always be stuff that breaks trending cycles, for example ASM 300.

  • @Jmillz181
    @Jmillz181 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The 9.9 book has huge staple indents next to nightcrawler. Not a "9.9" whatever the f that even is.

    • @ComicBookInvestments
      @ComicBookInvestments  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Ya it’s crazy how brand new modern books that are perfect can only get a 9.8 but this gets a 9.9

    • @davidsamuelson2089
      @davidsamuelson2089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Vinnie the dirt bag shilling you with his CGC toadies.

  • @dandelatorre1870
    @dandelatorre1870 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This “ 9.9 “ should literally be glistening and practically singing to us comic collectors but based on the pictures I’ve seen, no. This is the latest scheme from BlackStone Grading Co. ( Formerly known as CGC ).

  • @charlesfuchs
    @charlesfuchs 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    After many decades, finally a 9.9 LOL .... shits funny

  • @thomaspalmer6453
    @thomaspalmer6453 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    CGC has obviously watered down its grading standards as evidenced by the "9.9" Giant-Size X-Men #1. Why? To make more money, as you stated. More and more will gamble with their 9.8 copies, hoping to get that coveted 9.9.

    • @DanSchawbel
      @DanSchawbel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are a for-profit business it’s their fiduciary duty to wipe our bank accounts dry.

  • @tartuffethespry
    @tartuffethespry 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The 9.9 hunt is going to be like the BGS black label hunt

  • @rammisalami
    @rammisalami 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Funny that came out right as hype around the X-Men was building because of the new animated series.

  • @restonslaststand9946
    @restonslaststand9946 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I agree with you Dave, on the 9.8 grading, I've seen it and there's a TH-camr that submits every week to CGC calling the graders "Harsh Harry" and "Loose Larry". With this much disparity in graders, you can buy a 9.4-9.6, but pay the price of a 9.8 because CGC graded it that way. This TH-camr only complained about Harsh Harry, I'm sure he has a lot of lower actual grade books, but you can bet he's selling at the top price due to the CGC label.

  • @ThatsWhatSheSaidSportsCards
    @ThatsWhatSheSaidSportsCards 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You are 100% correct on this scrupulous manufactured issue. I could not agree more on all the issues and theories that you point out.
    The one thing that I would add that seems very obvious to me is that CGC through all of its recent litigation has learned that putting comics into their slabs with grades that are not truly deserved whether through illegal means (please see pending litigations), or in this case by over-grading the occasional valuable grail that they themselves CGC, can now benefit from a legalized re-holdering/switching out lower grade copies that are clearly not deserving of the new grade.
    CGC has basically just taken the exploitations used and exposed by those that they now are suing and found a legal yet questionable way to keep those undeserved profits and margins for themselves.
    Truly a shameful act by a once trusted company.

  • @JTpopCULT
    @JTpopCULT 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Since they started pre screening for 9.9’s they’ve lowered the standards. I sent in a book a few months ago and it came back a 9.9 and I’ve never got a 9.9. And a couple of my friends got 9.9 on there books.

  • @jacobbornowsky4013
    @jacobbornowsky4013 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I feel the whole attitude towards getting books graded becoming negative in this community it’s noticeable now nearly everyone sees it as a scam

  • @dtondro
    @dtondro 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    CCG started as a currency company! CGC is the comic grading portion. There’s like eight companies underneath the CCG Banner. Good Lord. I understand that what they’re doing is not good for the hobby, but that one comment just boggles my mind.

  • @michaelroot1960
    @michaelroot1960 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Spot on. These companies always have to figure out a way to sheer the sheep again. Getting thousands and thousands of 9’8’s and some 9’6’s resubmitted for the 9.9 screen is another grift. In ten or twenty years they could come up with a 10 pre screen. I’m a card collector and I’m waiting for PSA to change their label, add security features, etc…just so they can get tens of thousands of slabs resubmitted. Try to only get sheered once.

    • @ComicBookInvestments
      @ComicBookInvestments  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yup. There will be a 10.0 pre screen for sure

  • @SamTran-mc6rt
    @SamTran-mc6rt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Totally agreeing with you Bub...and CGC got me like a sucker, a honeybee buzzing over a pasture of flowers.
    I am one of those guys who is very optimistic when I have old graded books in my hands. I resubmit them over and over to get the grade I want or hope to obtain. Meanwhile, CGC is gladly collecting the service fees each and every time.
    It's all a money scheme; masterly planned by CGC.

  • @artofbusiness12
    @artofbusiness12 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To: Well…Everyone!!,
    “He’s not coming back to you! No one has allegiance to their mattress company!“
    Then… I just fell out at my job watching Dave …LOL…!!!!!!😂 😂😂😂
    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣….!!!
    - Thank you.
    ( I needed that Laugh! )

  • @jeffkib134
    @jeffkib134 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Isn’t re-grading a 9.8 as a 9.9 admitting that they didn’t grade the book properly the first time? How is that supposed to give anyone confidence in their business??? Maybe I should send in my 6.5 GSX 1 to see if I can get a 9.9 lol.

  • @markleneker9923
    @markleneker9923 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You're talking about "legal fraud," essentially. If there were industry-wide grading standardization and these were public and not private companies this would be much harder to happen.

  • @MJComix
    @MJComix 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This comic is nearly 50 years old, how is it a 9.9!!!

  • @darthjarwood7943
    @darthjarwood7943 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ive sent in hundreds of modern books to CGC and have never got a 9.9, a 10 isnt even on the radar...on a 25 book submission 9.8 prescreen i would get around 4 rejects and 21 9.8s never a 9.9

  • @mikes6368
    @mikes6368 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    In my honest opinion cgc business is ridiculous .. I’m also getting back 8.5 - 9.2 that look as good as some of my 9.8s
    I’m currently selling 7 boxes of graded books which is most my collection just because I don’t feel so good about a lot of books
    Also cgc just recently water damaged two of my books in a submission, not expensive books but someone definitely spilled something on them, just not worth sending them back

  • @mikedamore4739
    @mikedamore4739 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I had a House of Slaughter #1 CGC 9.8 that had a 1/2 inch spine split that I didn't understand how it could possibly have happened then I saw the video of the 200 power rangers books being graded and realized that only 45 seconds was spent looking over the whole book and that explained it. CGC's decisions of late are doing them more harm than good and I am all for it.

  • @stevechow2992
    @stevechow2992 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I agree... perfect time for CGC to do so. Coincidence or business decision to force a 9.9 on a big grail book. I call BS, but good attempt to produce excitement to resubmit some 9.8s.

  • @EMMANUELSANGELS
    @EMMANUELSANGELS 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    CGC has knowingly and adversely has affected the market value of many comic books!

    • @DanSchawbel
      @DanSchawbel 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yep

  • @superneilcomics8196
    @superneilcomics8196 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Recently I gave five books to CGC and my friend said they are worthy of a 9.8 after a pressing. The books are Amazing Spiderman #300, Amazing Spiderman #361, Amazing Spiderman #316, Ultimate Fallout #4, and Luke Cage Hero For Hire #1. So CGC will make more money give them 9.8 or 9.9 based on their current pricing model?

  • @dakoitcave817
    @dakoitcave817 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is what happens when human subjectivity and intrinsic motivations manipulate what should be an objective process. CGC could have implemented machine learning (AI) years ago to grade their books and didn’t because they know there’s a constant revenue stream for resubmits. Now they are doing it again with this gimmick. They know the psychology of greed and nerds, and will exploit it over and over again.

  • @BrianLCS
    @BrianLCS 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GCG changing their grading standards 24 years into their business is going to kill the integrity of their service.

  • @timreierson26
    @timreierson26 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No question that CGC is doing this to motivate collectors to re-submit. Actually a smart move on their part because they know the comic community won’t be able to help themselves. They are also moving to pulps and manga to offset the dwindling comic grading market. This will keep the cash cow flowing for a period of time. Automatic Comics looked at the 9.9 Giant Size X-Men and concluded that it likely was a 9.8. I wouldn’t touch the 9.9 for that reason.

  • @ilijamilovanovic3286
    @ilijamilovanovic3286 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    CGC just destroyed the Comic Collecting Industry….why would they ever EVER do this.

  • @davidtorres2048
    @davidtorres2048 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Spot on

  • @johnnyr859
    @johnnyr859 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Send your books to CBCS... I do!

  • @stephenbyce
    @stephenbyce 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nailed it

  • @Spaceageplaya03
    @Spaceageplaya03 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If u crack a 9.8 and send for a 9.9 pre-screen. If it fails it will come back raw right?

  • @WhatDoesEvilMean
    @WhatDoesEvilMean 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Doesn’t this mean that CBCS is also necessarily failing? What you’re describing would require that all comic grading companies are failing.

  • @SABERTUUTH
    @SABERTUUTH 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Way to go CGC!!! If people are careless with their money and keep falling for the grift then by all means keep bending them over and doing it with NO VASELINE 😂😂 #RAW

  • @rcaw1968
    @rcaw1968 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Strange ... If you go to the CGC Census, there are no 9.9's listed as graded. So you might be right.

  • @goldeneastgun
    @goldeneastgun 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It's like when Elon say, "FSD" and investors start drooling. It's never gonna happen in our lifetime, but they gotta try and pump up the stock somehow. It's almost as if capitalism is a scam 🙃

  • @WillKat66
    @WillKat66 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your right on base. 👍🏼🤙🏼💯

  • @elpeque-j9b
    @elpeque-j9b 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why trade or hold when you can start using Eledator? Copy trading make it easier