Sir, in MMC concept - internal feature You have taken Tolerance zone of LMC. At the last of this MMC concept it is said this is the concept of Resultant condition of MMC(but LMC is taken into consideration). I didn't get this sir for MMC concept, LMC is taken in resultant condition formula.
Sir, is it possible to produce the hole at MMC and shaft at LMC ( for example hole and shaft dia has the 30.1-30.5 and g-tol(position) is 0.1 but only thing is modifier changed for hole it is MMC and for shaft it is LMC). Result we can get same VC. Is it possible?
Hi Sir .. Is there any way to differentiate resultant and virtual condition in drawing ? How machining supplier will consider weather virtual or resultant condition.
Hi sir, I have been continuously watching all videos, in that your concept explanation was good but the importance of the concept was not much enough for me...rather than concept, understanding the need of concept is more important.so, i request you to explain the necessity of the concept before explaining the concept. apart, thanks for your videos. It hepls me to learn gd&t. Thank you .
for knowing the minimum material availability in worst case giving elaborate explanation for all applications in the forum is not practically feasible.
👍 simple & easy to understand. Good presenter!
Sir, in MMC concept - internal feature
You have taken Tolerance zone of LMC.
At the last of this MMC concept it is said this is the concept of Resultant condition of MMC(but LMC is taken into consideration).
I didn't get this sir for MMC concept, LMC is taken in resultant condition formula.
Hi Palani Thanks for the video 👍
Welcome
Sir, is it possible to produce the hole at MMC and shaft at LMC ( for example hole and shaft dia has the 30.1-30.5 and g-tol(position) is 0.1 but only thing is modifier changed for hole it is MMC and for shaft it is LMC). Result we can get same VC. Is it possible?
Hi Sir .. Is there any way to differentiate resultant and virtual condition in drawing ? How machining supplier will consider weather virtual or resultant condition.
Hi sir for internal features MMC in this vedio is 30.1 and virtual condition is 30. Why you have considered 30.5. could you please help me.
I also have the same doubt...
can you be more specific, because there are so many slides with different interpretation
@@PalaniKailash Slide # 3, MMC Concept - Internal Feature
Hi sir,
I have been continuously watching all videos, in that your concept explanation was good but the importance of the concept was not much enough for me...rather than concept, understanding the need of concept is more important.so, i request you to explain the necessity of the concept before explaining the concept. apart, thanks for your videos.
It hepls me to learn gd&t.
Thank you .
Gentleman, this channel is no basics of GD&T.
It is not a detailed course
Dear sir, we have one query , what is the meaning of modifier M with detum
Hello , pdf download link is not working , can u please correct it ?
sir when you come to board then only it will give proffer understanding
Sir internal feature ob 31-ib 29.6
And external feature ib 29- ob 30.4 what represent these value why we consider it and where we consider it
for knowing the minimum material availability in worst case
Thankyou sir
Sir, what should be considered to design parts for assebling Virtual condition or resultant condition?
for assembly of parts we always consider VC
@@PalaniKailash Thanks.
Hi anyone can answer the practical use of resultant condition ?
Same doubt
Sir, why TZ of mmc is used even if concept of LMC is used? And vice versa, please clear my doubts
the worst case would alway be for both MMC and LMC, so we consider both the case
What is the use of resultant condition?
Resultant conditions are very rarely used only when the minimum wall thickness calculation is critically required.
@@PalaniKailash Thank you sir
@@PalaniKailash Thank you sir. I had the same question.
Why we consider this boundry please still I got confusion so if you don't mind explain your answer elaborately thankyou sir
for knowing the minimum material availability in worst case
giving elaborate explanation for all applications in the forum is not practically feasible.
Why we need to consider Resultant Condition?
for calculation of minimum wall thickness