The World's Biggest Desalination Plants Should Not Exist

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.1K

  • @ilyadorokhov7827
    @ilyadorokhov7827 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +883

    Chemical engineer here. I worked at an aluminium smelter beside the water desalination plant in UAE.
    First of all, efficiency of all desalination methods is approaching thermodynamic limits. The biggest problem with any separation method is that you have to work against entropy of mixing which is very high (imagine how much effort it takes sort out M&Ms by colour but we have to sort out molecules). So the choice between thermal/membrane method is largerly driven by required scale: large scale favours huge thermal separtors, small scale is better with membranes.
    The biggest problem with water in GCC countries - is it's exessive demand for maintaining golf courses, open swimming pools, artificial lakes and forests. While this is a lifestyle choice and we can't solve this issue with engineering methods, there are potential areas for improvement. For example, sewage systems and wastewater treatment systems are very primitive. The best potential solution for water issues might be improved collection and recycling of waste water.

    • @homuraakemi493
      @homuraakemi493 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      Ok nerd

    • @مقاطعمترجمة-ش8ث
      @مقاطعمترجمة-ش8ث 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@homuraakemi493 Ok Internet Virgin

    • @Nphen
      @Nphen 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

      Since so much water is used for agriculture, switching to saltwater marsh farming could save quite a bit of water in all those nations. As for the golf courses & artificial lakes & forests; they would really benefit from using ancient permaculture techniques to infill more water and shade the ground without waste. You said sewage systems are primitive. They should be bulletproof. Every drop matters. You'd think they'd be obsessed with water conservation. Have they not read or seen Dune? I live among the largest freshwater supply on Earth (Great Lakes) and we try to value those water resources.

    • @shadowmistress999
      @shadowmistress999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      ditch the swimming pools and go for man made sea side pools -- with sea water, save the desalination effort lol

    • @KenBarrChannel
      @KenBarrChannel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Just making sure my message went through. We are not dealing with a technological problem, it's a political one.
      'Imagine No Corruption'
      - Great J. Lennon the first

  • @elitearbor
    @elitearbor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +793

    9:00 Sponge balls, square plants. Got it.
    I ain't laughing, but I got it.

    • @ChinchillaBONK
      @ChinchillaBONK 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

      Liar! 😂

    • @ntabile
      @ntabile 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      @@elitearbor Bikini Button!

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why😅

    • @quint3ssent1a
      @quint3ssent1a 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I laughed like an idiot. Haha, he said the funny thing 😅😅😅

    • @stofjes4204
      @stofjes4204 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@quint3ssent1a Fkc my English is not that well. Could you explain pls

  • @tHebUm18
    @tHebUm18 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +435

    7:20 Confirming that is how you represent Steam scientifically.

    • @samuelling2998
      @samuelling2998 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      I came right to the comments to see if anyone else noticed. Was not disappointed!

    • @vishaldwdi
      @vishaldwdi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@samuelling2998exactly

  • @Balkroth
    @Balkroth 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +824

    Just gotta say, I laughed at the steam Icon in the MSF diagram.

    • @mk500
      @mk500 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I loved this also 🤣

    • @Mordecrox
      @Mordecrox 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Also
      Spongeballs SquarePants

    • @kaplanfx
      @kaplanfx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I was cracking up too.

    • @logannasty3240
      @logannasty3240 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      google search first hit

    • @honor9lite1337
      @honor9lite1337 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Jeje😅

  • @TheNumberOfTheBeast666
    @TheNumberOfTheBeast666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +474

    I studied for a time under Doctor Tzahi Cath, who researched membrane processes for water and wastewater treatment application. When speaking about desalination, he always made it clear to indicate that we were near the physical limits of efficiency when it came to current technology, and that concepts like low energy desalination "is not something that nature likes." Desalination does have clear use cases outside of freshwater treatment; specifically, industrial wastewater treatment, where membrane desalination processes become cost effective when compared to other methods for removing specific hard to break down chemicals from waste process streams. It these more limited, specialist applications where desalination gets its legs. To be clear, at least from people researching at the edge of the field, no one is anticipating some breakthrough that transforms the economics around this treatment tool.

    • @kapilchhabria1727
      @kapilchhabria1727 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Could you post some literature for curious minds to read?

    • @Broken_robot1986
      @Broken_robot1986 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Damn

    • @TheNumberOfTheBeast666
      @TheNumberOfTheBeast666 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kapilchhabria1727 To be frank, I have nothing good on the subject outside of my course materials. th-cam.com/video/v6ZMuLTXbqQ/w-d-xo.html This video demonstrates how reverse osmosis works on a microscale level, and you can get a sense for why this is a process that has physical limits.

    • @lucasrem
      @lucasrem 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tzahi Cath is a theoretical guy, he can show the kids in school what the goals are, the benefits and disadvantages.
      He does not have the solution himself, he hopes he students will bring the solution !
      Any progress ?

    • @sino_diogenes
      @sino_diogenes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      the real breakthrough will be a massive reduction in the cost of energy. If the cost of energy reduces 10x then desalination suddenly becomes economically viable for anywhere with access to salt water.

  • @ps3301
    @ps3301 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

    They burn oil to get fresh water.

    • @floycewhite6991
      @floycewhite6991 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Thank Heaven they're switching to burning natural gas!

    • @lukasalej5710
      @lukasalej5710 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      bu hu, while the rest of developed world uses way to much water than they actualy need.

    • @chrism3784
      @chrism3784 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yep, which is causing the earth to warm so they need to burn more oil for a/c and more water

    • @Bell_plejdo568p
      @Bell_plejdo568p 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@lukasalej5710how does the rest of the world use way to much water

    • @mishmohd
      @mishmohd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Bell_plejdo568pfront lawns. Golf courses

  • @alexhubble
    @alexhubble 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +292

    If people want to live there, it costs what it costs. When the costs become unsustainable, people will have to leave or die, it's all very existential. There's absolutely no point waving environmental concerns, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia doesn't care. If the water stops there is no Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

    • @stuartgmk
      @stuartgmk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Yep pretty simple.

    • @Torchedini
      @Torchedini 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      And at the moment it is powered by our desire for oil. As long as that is what we need. We have this in the middle east.

    • @duran9664
      @duran9664 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      🚩Dude, Brine now is the true treasure 👊 It contain many valuable metals that their price has skyrocketed lately; like lithium, copper, magnesium & zinc. Plus, it contains rare earth metals like Vanadium, Gallium, & Molybdenum which r used in fusion experiments & high-tech industries.

    • @mrlithium69
      @mrlithium69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@duran9664 yes we have to rethink our waste products, they are secondary source of minerals once the waste is refined. which it would be refined. because theres so much of it and somewhat toxic. i'm sure someone would love paid to dispose of scrap brine. Billions are being spent on every end of the supply chain. these things take time.

    • @makisekurisu4674
      @makisekurisu4674 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Tbh, they are doing a lot to try and fix their problem.
      Its not line they're destroying someone else's shoreline.Its their own afterall.This shoreline can be used to attract more tourist and more money

  • @tracyrreed
    @tracyrreed 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +146

    🎶 Who lives in a desalinator next to the sea? 🎶
    🎶 Sponge Ball Square Plants! 🎶

  • @TheXuNiQue
    @TheXuNiQue 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +204

    I'm from Saudi Arabia , and everything consume at leas 2X amount of water because of heat and sun its 48C here (118.4 Fahrenheit) I drink around 2 liter per day and if you are working outside you need to drink 4 liter per day . its normal to consume more water in a hot place

    • @ethandouro4334
      @ethandouro4334 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      You guys could use this to reforestation program, specially in the Hijaz region, since it's fertile, turning the desert to a tropic is way less stressful than letting this madness desalination

    • @celdur4635
      @celdur4635 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      You should always drink 3-5 liters per day even without the work.

    • @richardarriaga6271
      @richardarriaga6271 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      ​@@ethandouro4334That takes agriculture-scale water. More since your goal is more acreage.

    • @ethandouro4334
      @ethandouro4334 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richardarriaga6271 I meant more like to create parks, like Tunisia did

    • @benwouda
      @benwouda 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Treated waste water from the cities are used to water plants in parks and agriculture

  • @CalgarGTX
    @CalgarGTX 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +755

    Bruh they are in the middle of a desert but won't use solar panels to heat up the water smh
    EDIT: These comments also smh for the most part xD
    We need asianometry vids on the current state of solar & battery storage tech and also on solar thermal potential applications urgently ! Some people still seem to think its the 1970s (When those MSF plants were built coincidentally) it's appalling...

    • @deeznutz5825
      @deeznutz5825 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Desalination is also a potent cure for the energy storage problems solar has, no need to store energy in batteries when the sun is brightest when you can just do all your desalination then and store the water indefinitely.

    • @liledw13
      @liledw13 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +164

      Even better would be a large scale solar reflector.
      Focusing a large area of solar energy into a single point would heat up water faster.

    • @daddust
      @daddust 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That would drive solar panel production and drive down costs and spur technology development. They’re not using renewables for anything ever, bandit kings that they are.

    • @adamk.7177
      @adamk.7177 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +129

      ​@@liledw13 Nice, direct energy transfer. No need to maintain solar panels, far simpler setup. Also, if the refractor gets dirty, you can just wash it in seawater.

    • @bennyklabarpan7002
      @bennyklabarpan7002 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why would they use solar when they have more oil than they can sell without lowering the global prices? Solar is much less efficient than nuclear, it's not really profitable anywhere without subsidies.

  • @MithunOnTheNet
    @MithunOnTheNet 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    As someone who grew up in Bahrain, the scaling on taps was still bad and the water was still slightly salty despite the distillation. Of course, I was last in Bahrain in 2002, so maybe things have improved since.

  • @Veritas419
    @Veritas419 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +139

    Water > No water. Nuclear powered desalination > Fossil fueled desalination

    • @umaikakudo
      @umaikakudo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Who in their right mind is going to give or allow a Gulf State to possess fissile materials?

    • @nikolatasev4948
      @nikolatasev4948 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

      @@umaikakudo South Korea. They built nuclear power plants in Abu Dhabi.

    • @nabilfreeman
      @nabilfreeman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Check your political views at the door?

    • @nomaster5647
      @nomaster5647 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Now you only have to store the depleted uranium for the next 250 million years. Earth’s end is coming for humans

    • @Dongonzales123
      @Dongonzales123 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Nuclear powered desalination < renewable powered desalination.
      It's in the desert. Wind and sun are abundant.

  • @Spacedog79
    @Spacedog79 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +200

    Nuclear is the ideal way to do desalination, zero carbon, 24/7, and you're processing large amounts of water for cooling anyway so you get it basically for free.

    • @Frostbytedigital
      @Frostbytedigital 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      Not to mention the reactive elements found in seawater that we could be using to fuel the facility after refinement. The obviousness of nuclear always seems to get upended by the politics however

    • @Spacedog79
      @Spacedog79 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      @@Frostbytedigital And while you're at it with a high temp reactor you can extract the CO2 and use it to create synthetic fuels for carbon neutral transportation. There are endless possibilities which somehow have yet to make it on to policy maker's radars.

    • @seankinney3797
      @seankinney3797 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      nuclear is expensive to build though, solar or wind is several times cheaper.

    • @markfowler2066
      @markfowler2066 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      You folks must work in the public sector, you never talk about cost...

    • @benmcreynolds8581
      @benmcreynolds8581 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Seriously! I just commented basically the same thing as your comment did. I don't get why it's not happening yet? We are so far behind where we should be that it frustrates me beyond belief. IMO this should be clear: The fact that Desalination is so energy intensive but fresh water is so important.. What If we dedicated nuclear energy to be the main energy option to run these energy hungry desalination plants?? Idk why we aren't already doing this anywhere we could...?
      Seriously think about it.. Nuclear power produces no green house gas emissions. It's extremely energy efficient. The list goes on. So why are we not utilizing this... We are being extremely too slow, too reserved, too cautious, too inactive to even make the smallest dent into our climate issue and our energy issues. It's holding back progression across the board in many different area's.. It's honestly getting really frustrating. I thought we would be more motivated than this. More active than this....?

  • @uss_04
    @uss_04 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    07:14
    Would you say the Source of Steam is a Valve?

    • @ali_alami
      @ali_alami 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      and there is only 2 valves

  • @michaelimbesi2314
    @michaelimbesi2314 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    I’m not sure that fab is the correct term to refer to any industrial facility other than semiconductor plants

    • @marilynlucas5128
      @marilynlucas5128 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      LOL

    • @spyczech
      @spyczech 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Fab analysis

  • @ggtgp
    @ggtgp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +104

    Dead Sea brine is processed for fertilizer, you can see it from space covering the south end of the sea.

    • @floycewhite6991
      @floycewhite6991 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      No kiss tonight honey, you're wearing a Dead Sea facial mask.

    • @BracaPhoto
      @BracaPhoto 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Salt makes GREAT fertilizer 😂😂❤❤

    • @Wordbird69
      @Wordbird69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      Did you know that you can use old motor oil to fertilize your lawn?

    • @marca9955
      @marca9955 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@BracaPhoto Yes, salting the enemies earth was a famous economic kickstarter. Like an ancient Marshal plan.

    • @danisraelmalta
      @danisraelmalta 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Very different process from RED SEA distillation process brine...

  • @Esty210
    @Esty210 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    9:03 Who lives in a pineapple under the steam?

    • @mfaizsyahmi
      @mfaizsyahmi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      SpongeBalls SquarePlants!

    • @wedmunds
      @wedmunds 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mfaizsyahmioOWWW my sponge balls, woaoaoaoah

  • @artiumnihamkin9206
    @artiumnihamkin9206 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    05:23 Saudi Arabia produce 2.9 billion cubic meters of water not 2.9 million.

  • @aalhard
    @aalhard 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    8:08 the irony is that desalination is so focused on efficiency, but any time fresh water is found efficiency goes out the window😮
    We all must be efficient when no one is looking!

  • @rceldib
    @rceldib 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I am amazed that no one is talking about out how much water is used to process oil into gasoline. From what I understand it is about two gallons of water for each gallon of gas. Our local RO plant in Los Angeles sends 60% of what they process into ultra pure water to the petroleum refineries. How much of that water in the Middle East is for the oil industry?

    • @filanfyretracker
      @filanfyretracker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      probably should switch the refineries to grey water. That is the water that comes out of the wastewater plants, Industrial process is an idea first use for recycled water. A city is not the ISS and the residents are not yet ready for recycled water(that is looping the wastewater back into the drinking water plant's inlet pipe). But a factory wont care, the gasoline making machine or a data center just needs water in general, So send em the water that the wastewater plant would just dump into the ocean.

  • @Flumphinator
    @Flumphinator 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Given that you can’t do literally anything without water, $7B is actually a screaming deal for that capacity.

  • @xjdisuehd
    @xjdisuehd 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +78

    Till now, water has been mostly free or very highly subsidized in Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other ME oil rich nations. The idea of a government provided service being non-subsidized and breaking even is unacceptable in the region, as citizens don't revolt as long as they are kept rich with plushy useless jobs in the public sector and services are provided at dirt cheap prices.
    Rather than invoke fury and revolt among citizens, Saudis, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE - all have chosen to privatize their water industry, with only government oversight to regulate profiteering. The problem is that these MSF plants are so damn expensive, that the water prices will shoot upto around $8/1000 gallons, assuming that the private players would have to buy energy at market prices. That is the landed price to customers.
    Another project silently undergoing is inviting renewable energy companies to partner with RO desalination private players (predominantly Israeli or using Israeli origin technology) but it faces two issues - lack of diplomatic ties with Israel and the surrounding waters in ME where the sites would be optimal have been polluted beyond repair in terms of increasing salinity and massive amounts of chemicals and heavy metals (which are present in cleaning chemicals). That can be repaired by changing the membranes somewhat and having additional pre-treatment, and this is one of the reasons that UAE has made diplomatic relations with Israel and Saudi is wanting too, all thrown off by the Hamas. Qatar is on the fence as the Qatari royal family is kind of a fundamental wahabi supporter and believer, but Qatar if it continues this will face massive backlash with Trump reportedly willing to remove the massive US base away from Qatar.
    The other factor in play is American oil and gas pumping. Europe wants more gas and ME had a market cornered but then US strikes back with massive LNG facilities and the ability to pump out enough gas to meet Europe's demand. At a cheaper price, as American natural gas is surprisingly cheaper, due to domestic cheap prices. Middle Eastern countries can no longer afford to continue subsidizing everything for its citizens as it as causing dents in their budgets. Another reason, ME governments want to get out of water desalination and privatize it.
    This isn't only about water, but - about water, geopolitics, and economics.

    • @smalltime0
      @smalltime0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      It blows my mind that they had water for free. I only heard about it when talking to a Saudi in Germany and he mentioned his parents installing a pool (in SA).
      I was like "Yeah but even in SW Australia the evaporation means the upkeep is pricey" "we don't pay for water in SA"
      WTF, like WTF.

    • @sudeepmitra
      @sudeepmitra 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    • @johnl.7754
      @johnl.7754 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      With the exorbitant luxury spending that the rulers (including extended families) and government officials spend I can understand why the people of those countries demand these essential free stuff.

    • @floycewhite6991
      @floycewhite6991 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You forgot injecting sea water into oil fields to force the remaining oil out. Brine could be used instead.

    • @lucasrem
      @lucasrem 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Saudi Arabia is not your friendly Nation.
      Only some people can benefit from the oil lords, change is needed badly.
      Religious freaks in power, Allah is evil.

  • @aoeuable
    @aoeuable 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    Let me get this straight: The Arabs are having trouble getting at *heat*, of all things. Not even temperature differentials, but plain heat as long as it's above 100C. Or, differently put, is there an actually good reason why they're not using solar-thermal.

    • @obsidianjane4413
      @obsidianjane4413 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

      Notice how in most of the facilities pictures every horizontal surface looks brown? That is dust. So keeping solar concentrators clean in a desert is a problem. Also they don't work at night, so you lose half of your production capacity.

    • @tee2567
      @tee2567 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      @@obsidianjane4413 Well, you could rinse them off occasionally. Wait...

    • @cyberninjazero5659
      @cyberninjazero5659 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      ​@@tee2567Water is a flat circle

    • @ChangedNames
      @ChangedNames 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tee2567Damn, you people are so stupid. Think before speaking & if youre ignorant of a topic then dont lash out with your "genius idea" and disregard the "current status" instead ask why the current idea is being used not yours.
      And dont stop at the first racist answer

    • @pretty7545
      @pretty7545 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@tee2567you can also use dirt to clean dirt off of solar panels but why do that when you can boost the price of oil with every large addition to demand so that at least on paper you get a big rebate on your desal plant?

  • @swolefly4743
    @swolefly4743 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    I LOVE ASIANOMETRY

    • @wrxgeneration
      @wrxgeneration 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you zip him up when you finished?

  • @taiwanluthiers
    @taiwanluthiers 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I suppose they can dig a hole and pump all their brine there, and evaporate them into some kind of a dead sea mineral pond... Surely there's lots of stuff in seawater that can now be extracted.

  • @microcomputermaster
    @microcomputermaster 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    A US company called Capture6 is working on a method to use the waste brine from desalination for a carbon dioxide capture and mineralization process. They're getting government funding to build pilot plants in Australia, South Korea, and California, but it'll be several years before any of these plants can demonstrate if the technology is feasible.

    • @manyulgarprsch
      @manyulgarprsch 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What products will they get after the mineralization?

    • @microcomputermaster
      @microcomputermaster 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@manyulgarprsch Some kind of calcium carbonate I think. I've heard of a few universities which demonstrated that it could be blended into concrete or plaster, but even if you just buried it, the carbon dioxide would be stable in that form.

  • @vi6ddarkking
    @vi6ddarkking 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    As the need for need for water increases I wonder if Solar Domes for Desalination are going to become more common due to their efficiency and low cost closer to the equator.
    After all Desalination is an energy intensive process, using the heat of the sun in the simplest form of Desalination, would definitely be an interesting possibility.

  • @jestubbs69
    @jestubbs69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    One of the largest desalination plants in north. America is where I live in Ensenada Baja CA, Mexico. Many many many other small R.O. purification plants in nearly every neighborhood working with high salinity well water. They make outstanding quality live water. + High alkaline water. City or trucked water is nasty filthy stuff. Only for washing. Use borax, soda & vinegar in your laundry as it’s insanely hard. There are also many thermal springs. Still water is scarce and in shortage in many areas.

  • @lynndonharnell422
    @lynndonharnell422 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    A story i heard in KSA in early 90s. Corrosion expert called into the plant up near Ras Tanura over severe corrosion problem. Turns out they located the brine discharge rigjr next to the Gulf water intake. Duh.

  • @bonzita23
    @bonzita23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

    07:55 Steam logo lol

    • @Molkit007
      @Molkit007 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you're du mb

  • @somedude-lc5dy
    @somedude-lc5dy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +148

    desalination seems like good use-case for dumping excess solar power. this allows you to over-build solar farms so that even cloudy days can meet 100% of electricity need. water is great at being stored in reservoirs, so it makes for easy "energy" storage. though, limiting population growth in resource limited areas is probably for the best, but that's not something easy for a government or group of outside countries to sell to a local population.

    • @captiannemo1587
      @captiannemo1587 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      That requires planning.

    • @oohhboy-funhouse
      @oohhboy-funhouse 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

      @@captiannemo1587 "Planning" is optimistic given the kinds of projects being built in the Gulf states. Skiing in the desert checks out.

    • @kapilchhabria1727
      @kapilchhabria1727 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      We have very good and cheap ways to store excess solar energy: pumped hydro storage.

    • @Nelo390
      @Nelo390 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@kapilchhabria1727 only in places with mountains.

    • @brunetyannick1174
      @brunetyannick1174 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@Rubicola174 They do struggle with sand storms though. I don't think that's too nice for solar panels longevity.

  • @newtoncorp
    @newtoncorp 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You can use brime for cement, that will absorb CO2 from atmosphere, trials in saudi at the moment
    In Dubai, the water is first sent to people, then treated and used in agriculture and landscaping

    • @MikeAlabbasi
      @MikeAlabbasi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Same thing here in 🇧🇭 Bahrain, desalinated water is mainly for domestic use, after using it gets treated and used in agriculture or landscaping.
      Moreover, in order to limit the consumption of water; the government of 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia has an export ban list for many crops, and if I'm not mistaken the 🇦🇪 UAE has a similar list as well.

  • @Nphen
    @Nphen 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Their mistake is fighting against the ocean and salt water. A project in Spain is using halophytes, or salt-tolerant crops, to form saltwater marshes. The tech is simple - canals & gates. The harvest of biomass is 3x what land crops produce. The plants are edible and also make amazing skincare & cosmetics. The marshes also produce animal protein in the form of crabs, shellfish, fish, and frogs, as well as being a habitat for flamingos. The Middle East has all the sun & ocean water they could ever want for. They need to start planting their coastlines with saltwater marshes. It's hard to believe this hasn't been tried.

    • @mukkaar
      @mukkaar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ah yes, those salt tolerant crops produce tons of freshwater.

    • @Nphen
      @Nphen 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mukkaar Those nations use 80% of their water supply for freshwater crops. If they stop using their freshwater for crops, and use salt water farming instead, they will use less water.

  • @Phil-D83
    @Phil-D83 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    Waste heat from a nuclear reactor makes more sense

    • @cole1
      @cole1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      yeah but we still have the scaling problem. hmmmm

    • @gmu3134
      @gmu3134 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Middle east… I don’t think US would approve

    • @Ben942K
      @Ben942K 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@gmu3134every country can actually have nuclear power… They have to promise not to use it for nefarious means among other things. It’s the cost associated with it that’s a deterrent.

    • @hermanwillem7057
      @hermanwillem7057 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@gmu3134ain't the only one with nuke

    • @co2_os
      @co2_os 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@Ben942K yeah I don't think big daddy allows it still, otherwise they'd be working on it right now, but maybe soon.

  • @CarolineAcheson
    @CarolineAcheson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    He realized there had been several deaths on this road, but his concern rose when he saw the exact number.

  • @MrArnoudje
    @MrArnoudje 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Ive worked in the commissioning at the Jebel Ali facility’s in the past. It is extremely big. These countries need power and water in that combination MSR really makes sense. Heat would be wasted anyway in steam turbine condensors.

  • @thesaltycabbage
    @thesaltycabbage 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I remember seeing the plant in malta and thinking how did we do this in 1881 and africa still can't get water

  • @rudilapa6569
    @rudilapa6569 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks!

  • @ntabile
    @ntabile 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Singapore also have a desalination plant.

    • @Wolf-yr1qy
      @Wolf-yr1qy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      has*. Singapore is a singular subject, so you need a singular verb. For example, he has.

    • @ntabile
      @ntabile 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Wolf-yr1qy thank you, grammar teacher. I'm blaming the samsung spell and grammar check 😉

  • @wastedtimefr
    @wastedtimefr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Also to be noted, in saudi arabia, a substantial amount of this fresh water is used for oil resevoirs pressure maintenance, so not used by humans

  • @thefunnyfritz4035
    @thefunnyfritz4035 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Looks like smn out of Just Cause 0:16

    • @frankg7786
      @frankg7786 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hahaha yes it does

    • @diantonovich
      @diantonovich 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No they sell it pretending it is from zamzam well in Mecca . It’s a kind of scam

  • @bartz0rt928
    @bartz0rt928 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    hm. I remember a video item years ago of an experimental low tech setup somewhere in northern Africa (I think it was Tunisia but I'm not sure). They built greenhouses with a brick wall facing the prevailing sea wind, and the bricks were made with little horizontal holes running through them all over. The moist air would flow in, containing enough water to sustain the plants in and even around the greenhouses. Salt would accumulate on the brick of course, but could apparently be removed easily enough and used as a cheap building material (I guess the benefit of a very arid environment is that you can build a house out of compacted salt "bricks"). The plan was to build these structures in large enough numbers to de-desertify a part of the northern Sahara, giving people access to locally and sustainably produced water and food. I have no idea what happened with that idea. It's obviously a much slower and more labor-intensive way to go about it, but it strikes me as much more robust long-term. Given the gulf states' high tech fetish though any plan like that might be DOA.

  • @someoneyouusedtoknow
    @someoneyouusedtoknow 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Thank you for breaking that down into Olympic size swimming pools for us Americans 😂

    • @AB1Vampire
      @AB1Vampire 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A privileged unit of measurement.

  • @buckstarchaser2376
    @buckstarchaser2376 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Seawater evaporation ponds work for cleaning salt outdoors, in the dirt, because the growing salt crystals will naturally exclude nearly all things that don't fit right in the crystal lattice. When you harvest the wet crystals from the ponds, they may have a concentrated level of contaminants in the spent liquor that clings to the wet crystals, but this is why there is a plant for "washing" the salt. Normally, purification by crystallization is way overkill for food grade products. It just happens to be one of the easiest ways to get brilliant white salt crystals from muddy seawater.

  • @jsalsman
    @jsalsman 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    ...also, when describing energy inputs, you can't ignore how many solar panels the mere interest on those petrodollar reserves will pay for. It's only a matter of time. Solar is renewable, gas and oil is not.

    • @umaikakudo
      @umaikakudo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The sun is renewable. Solar panels are not.

  • @allah.remembrance
    @allah.remembrance 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ras AL Khair, Saudi Arabia is the world's largest desalination plant with a capacity of 2,998,000 m3/day. It is also recorded in Guinesses World Records.

  • @doujinflip
    @doujinflip 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    14:34 I remember at COP28 that one of the UAE desal plants had an exhibit, and I asked them what they do with all that brine. Apparently there's a substantial market for hypersaline seawater. For what exactly the buyers don't reveal, but the plant reps say sometimes upwards of like 80% of their wastewater gets sold and trucked away.

    • @boozecruiser
      @boozecruiser 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They seem like a trustworthy bunch.

    • @ChessAndRaspberryMojito
      @ChessAndRaspberryMojito 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That amounts to some 20 trucks a day, not impossible, but rather weird if no one can make the numbers on where it’s worth using

  • @pinaxl2
    @pinaxl2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    when will water mining be considered to have enough potential?, water mining as in the activity of recovery of mineral deposits mixed in the water.

  • @uss_04
    @uss_04 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    Was recently rewatching up the nuclear desalination video .
    There’s discussion of Arizona having a desalination plant at the sea of Cortez and unlike the west coast it has no clear outflow, meaning salinity will build up there over time.

    • @floycewhite6991
      @floycewhite6991 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Sea of Cortez? You mean the Gulf of California. What's the matter? You have a problem with Baja California?

  • @TV-8-301
    @TV-8-301 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've probably said this before, but I appreciate how your videos are information-rich and easy to understand without unnecessary frills to make it more "engaging"

  • @jamesrobinson9176
    @jamesrobinson9176 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Why would ag runoff have heavy metals?

  • @OneRedKraken
    @OneRedKraken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Never read or cared about water desalination. But when someone explains something well I can't help myself but listen. Great video!

  • @CarneyBarney-qo7wq
    @CarneyBarney-qo7wq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Would be cool if you could look in to fish farming. Living in the isle of Skye in the western Highlands of Scotland, the industry is ubiquitous and not without controversy.

  • @creativecraving
    @creativecraving 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    7:40 😂 People older than 35 won't understand why you'very chosen that logo for steam! ❤ I love the humor. 😅

  • @0MoTheG
    @0MoTheG 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Turning sewages (poop) back to water would limit the need somewhat.

    • @floycewhite6991
      @floycewhite6991 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      King of Saudi Arabia sets a good example for his people by swigging only toilet-to-tap.

  • @bernardfinucane2061
    @bernardfinucane2061 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rainwater catching is also an option. Red Sea towns like Jeddah suffers flash flooding because the Saudis make no attempt to prevent the seasonal rains from flowing out of the hills and into the Red Sea. Another problem is the careless waste of water in agriculture. There have been improvements in wastewater treatment for reuse, but there is still a long way to go.

  • @johnkeller2952
    @johnkeller2952 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Okay soooo what just pumping brine out into the middle of the empty quarter? Can't contaminate the groundwater if there is none

    • @eclecticmemes
      @eclecticmemes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is the most obvious solution.... Spray a million gallons a day of brine into the air in the middle of nowhere and you get instant salt flats as well as temperature reduction and humidity increase (for downwind agriculture) . Any brine that makes it to the ground will be filtered by the sand so that by the time it hits the water table, if it ever makes it, it will be as fresh as a mountain stream.

    • @magical_blue
      @magical_blue 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      there are huge aquafers ander there+ oil and gas

  • @crunchworks22
    @crunchworks22 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Asianometry continues to be one of the highest quality channels on YT!

  • @vidanimated6850
    @vidanimated6850 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    What you're missing out is that in Saudi Arabia, companies like Marafiq use a hybrid plant where steam is used to also generate electricity. Thus, the problem you're mentioning isn't really a problem if the heat isn't being wasted.

    • @caav56
      @caav56 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's mentioned right before membrane method

    • @jasonreed7522
      @jasonreed7522 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@caav56 taking advantage of the waste heat physics requires a thermal power plant to regect, and building an open cycle steam engine so you can drink the condensate are 2 very different things.
      Personally an open cycle concentrated solar plant would be ideal. Use the sea water to cool the output steam and condensate with a counter flow heat exchanger then use the molten salt to boil the sea water to distil it into brine and high pressure steam.
      It only needs to run during the day since water is easier stored, but theoretically a large enough molten salt reservoir can carry generation into the night.
      As a producer of both water and electricity your only concern is what to do with the brine. (Personally i would use evaporation pools/lakes to reduce it to pure seasalt for sale)

  • @farhan00
    @farhan00 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "They should not exixt"
    So what should the people do, just not drink water?

    • @nikolatasev4948
      @nikolatasev4948 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Use less energy-intensive desalination methods. Use the fresh water more efficiently - fewer golf fields, open swimming pools, etc.

    • @co2_os
      @co2_os 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@nikolatasev4948 yeah cause these are the major consumers of water in the entire country. What are you talking about. Plus I'm sure newer plants are built to the new standards and are more energy efficient, you can't simply nuke the biggest desalination plants in the planet.

    • @Vmac1394
      @Vmac1394 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the case of the Gulf States maybe don't import millions of slav-, I mean "migratory workers, " to the point where your population has increased by 5x in 50 years.

  • @_ingoknito
    @_ingoknito 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    no need to apologize for potatos

  • @phlogistanjones2722
    @phlogistanjones2722 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for the video.
    7:18 Steam symbol
    9:04 Sponge Balls, Square Plants
    Your comedic acumen is ALWAYS a joy to behold sir.
    I truly understand the hesitancy of a reasonable person to endorse a process that consumes massive amounts of free energy.
    I though STRONGLY subscribe to the notion of the Kardashev Scale.
    Cheap, ubiquitous, useful energy is KEY to the advancement of civilizations. All of them. Always. The ability to generate and manipulate increasing energy densities and quantities IS civilization.
    That is what brings a "better life" for everyone, everywhere, every time. Always. Using dirty energy is foolish but often is a short term necessity as a bridge. It is no longer necessary and THAT is my objection. Burning chemical feedstocks to make heat is a waste. An inefficiency nightmare on an industrial scale. So we agree on that but Nuclear for baseline energy is a solved problem. All other forms of useful energy can and should be explored but to not replace baseline needs with clean, efficient nuclear is both foolish and short sighted. Putting too many eggs in too few baskets is an absolute nightmare on a national scale and for that reason alone your concerns are certainly warranted as well. My only real concern with RO is that it is by its very nature 'high-tech" and the membranes are still relatively expensive and relatively difficult to manufacture. Industrial scale can be stupid simple as you noted with the Saudi designs.
    I have an RO unit in my own home so obviously that concern is probably overblown on my part but I would prefer a simple solar still for simplicities sake.
    I also think that throwing the concentrated brine away is foolish. You just spent a lot of time, effort and energy making it and there are a LOT of valuable materials RIGHT THERE. Since most of those places that have so much excess brine have HUGE tracts of...Land. I can certainly see them dedicating some of it to big ol' settling/evap ponds. That is just my opinion. I could be wrong.
    Peaceful Skies.

  • @magnvss
    @magnvss 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Imagine when they finally run dry of their oil production (which allows them to run such huge and energy-intensive desalination plants): with such a huge population (relative to their water supply), you would witness one of the biggest humanitarian crises the world will ever see.

    • @docwatson1134
      @docwatson1134 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No way it will drag on that long.
      Within three to five years, it will become apparent, that CO2 reduction is possible, and largely solved. Then the remaining heavy users of fossil fuels will face planetary scrutiny. And demands to transition to solar immediately!

    • @daviddavidson1417
      @daviddavidson1417 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A mass migration into the better managed parts of the world while blaming them, most likely.

    • @DRakeTRofKBam
      @DRakeTRofKBam 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Theres not necessarily an event where the oil will just stop running.
      I imagine the humanitarian disasters will come even before they stop deciding to siphen the reservoirs empty due to earthquakes and sinkholes.

    • @benr7294
      @benr7294 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Or they just build nuclear plants

    • @0thPAg
      @0thPAg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They have solar.

  • @winnieid2727
    @winnieid2727 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The membrane in RO is hard to make. The natural one is not renewable, that the negative of RO water (if i'm not wrong)

  • @wasimshaikh1665
    @wasimshaikh1665 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    7:26 Steam logo 🤣🤣

  • @chahahc
    @chahahc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Regarding decentralization, I wonder what a water system would look like that distributed purified (not desalinated) seawater and tasked each household with desalinating it with their own home RO system.

    • @lukasalej5710
      @lukasalej5710 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      say goodbye to the pipes transfering that salty water in few years

  • @UtahBlender
    @UtahBlender 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    The problem will fix itself. Saudi Arabia, for example, is throwing money at any big touristy project which will make their economy less reliant on oil. However, once the oil dries up, nobody will want to go to a desert for vacation. The GCC countries will revert back to escorting camels around the desert and water demand will plummet.

    • @jihadalsweed
      @jihadalsweed 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Has nothing to do with the video, just a pure hatred

    • @موسى_7
      @موسى_7 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree

    • @LackofFaithify
      @LackofFaithify 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Other than leaving out what will no doubt be an unpleasant body count, yeah, I can't see how it goes anyway but this. They've spent so much on this that and the other to diversify/change/etc...,but they just can't stop being what they've been.

  • @ulrichraymond8372
    @ulrichraymond8372 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For scaling salt metal discs can be used and driven by either the use of electromagnetism or by pressure difference along the length of the pipe. It is also possible to shock waves through controlled explosions in the pipes but not sure if this crazy or practical. There is also a possibility of heating the hard to reach places by locally heating bends in pipes by the used of magnetic flux.

  • @MoritzvonSchweinitz
    @MoritzvonSchweinitz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    It's a pity we don't use some simple nuclear option for this. At the very least to pre-heat the water or something. Should be rather trivial to build, could use low-grade nuclear fuel and feels like it could be deployed in something like a sealed container.

    • @yren3386
      @yren3386 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Boiling water reactor? Guess what else are boiling water reactors? Chernobyl and Fukushima
      Also, that's basically putting more nuclear materials into the vicinity of several most politically unstable regions.

  • @rialtho_the_magnificent
    @rialtho_the_magnificent 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    6:17 I recognised this building when I was in Malta in 2014. The tree on the right is now much bigger

  • @87solarsky
    @87solarsky 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    No Oil = No Water ?!

    • @frankstrawnation
      @frankstrawnation 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Crazy, no?

    • @lucasrem
      @lucasrem 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Allah is Oil, that's how these warlords keep their power !
      With water, they show the same friedyness !
      Dessert people are weirdo people, why there freaks ?

    • @MrFateTube
      @MrFateTube 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      israel has(had?) no oil, but is exporting desalinated water to neighbors(meaning it is overproduced compared to their own needs).

    • @87solarsky
      @87solarsky 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MrFateTube
      In the case of Israel this isn't overproduction, but rather a way of economically maintaining strategic production reserves, in case the water levels in the Sea of Galilee aren't sufficient for drinking water extraction.

    • @NeovanGoth
      @NeovanGoth 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No. Reverse osmosis is far more energy efficient and there's more than enough sun in the desert.

  • @TheSonic10160
    @TheSonic10160 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think desalination is one of those industrial processes that pairs well with nuclear energy. A nuclear power plant produces enormous waste heat for essentially free, waste heat from the turbines can be used in cogeneration or as preheat for intake water, while process heat could be directly derived from the nuclear reactor.

    • @evryhndlestakn
      @evryhndlestakn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheSonic10160 nuclear energy doesn't pair well with anything. People seem to regard nuclear energy as free power which simply isn't the case. No matter how well the process is improved, there will always be waste product as a result of the process & it comes with ramifications as well as a cost. The waste isn't taken care & put aside a year after it is depleted. Of course it stays toxic & lethal for thousands of years. A nuclear power station costs more to run & decommission than the value of the energy it can produce in its lifetime. It's not even anything to do with any risks. Just on an economic level, the question of nuclear power stations isn't as clear as it first appears.

    • @TheSonic10160
      @TheSonic10160 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@evryhndlestakn Sure nuclear pairs well with thermal desalination, you can run a desal. plant on the waste steam after it's been through the turbines, or you could replace the gas burning boilers with a nuclear reactor, as nuclear tech is way better at making raw heat than electricity, which is the unique advantage nuclear has amidst the portfolio of clean energy sources, only it and concentrated solar are any good at making industrially useful amounts of heat for chemical processes.
      Yes there is nuclear waste, but compared to the waste streams of everything else, only hydro and geothermal power outperform it in terms of 'waste'. Wind and solar produce tides of toxic sludge in their manufacture as part of the refining of rare-earths needed for efficient solar panels and powerful permanent magnets. In Europe and the US this sludge is managed somewhat, while in China, where over 90% of the world's panels are made that shit is just dumped out onto the ground to make a toxic kill zone bigger than Manhattan Island, free to dry up and blow around. Not including any talk of batteries, of course. Which yes, are getting better, but are still a massive externality and a ruinous cost to wind and solar infrastructure that's similarly short-lived and has only really started being talked about this decade.
      Fully processed nuclear waste is dangerous for about 300 years, afterwards the only way it can hurt you is if you grind it up and eat it. 90% of CO2 in the atmosphere emitted today will still be there in a thousand years. Meanwhile the heavy metals in coal fly ash, and rare-earth refinery slap ponds will still be as deadly as the way it was dumped out forever.
      How I really know you're a total joker who doesn't have a fucking clue what they're talking about is when you said nuclear isn't profitable. If that were the case, how come every nuclear power plant operator in the US is trying to reopen closed plants, and extend the lives of the ones they have? It couldn't be because once they've paid off their construction loans, nuclear power is actually the single most profitable form of power generation on the planet?
      th-cam.com/video/UC_BCz0pzMw/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/uqZTsy3Dav8/w-d-xo.htmlL&t=475
      The ONLY economic problem facing nuclear power is the short-term focus on immediate profits over all else from the private investment sector, and that construction takes longer than a political term in the public services sector.
      Otherwise, the nuclear renaissance is already happening, The biggest banks in the world are ignoring your dogma and pledging support for nuclear power projects, since it offers guaranteed long-term returns.
      www.ft.com/content/96aa8d1a-bbf1-4b35-8680-d1fef36ef067
      Governments all across the world are turning back to nuclear now that Russian gas is out of the question. Belgium recently stumped up five billion Euro for an expansion of its Borssele NPP and to get some Rolls-Royce SMRs built too.
      So I'm gonna need you to come up with some fresh content in your criticisms of nuclear power, and quit regurgitating falsehoods and anti-nuclear talking points that have been dead for more than a decade at this point.

  • @Shinzon23
    @Shinzon23 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    This is actually a really good reason why we should be investing in nuclear power plants because get a couple of those running and you'd have all the fresh water you need for a while

    • @randomchannel-px6ho
      @randomchannel-px6ho 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The issue is per kilowatt hour nuclear is far more expensive
      Of course the calculus looks different when you consider emissions and other cost not reflected in the price tag but thats not how the world works sadly
      I'm bullish on nuclewr fusion eventually working out in part because we're kinda screwed if we can't find an overabudant source of clean energy

    • @mbican
      @mbican 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      ​@@randomchannel-px6honuclear lasts 80 years, it's more expensive the first 10-20 years of operation but then old nuclear turns into a money printer. Where is the whole mindset that father seeds a tree so his grandson can benefit from the grown tree?

    • @rogerk6180
      @rogerk6180 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Price is just far to high. It just isn't competitive.

    • @hawoaliahmed6996
      @hawoaliahmed6996 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      if you price in the grid stability batteries and ecological damages,
      nuclear is not that more expansive, arguably one of the cheapest.
      and even whitout pricing that in is still a magnitude cheaper than fossil fuels.

    • @mysticalmikeday
      @mysticalmikeday 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@mbicanlol they're hungry and they ate the seed already.

  • @chris-hayes
    @chris-hayes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love how you present these topics, very professional.

  • @transistor703
    @transistor703 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Quick babe Asianometry just dropped a new vid 👀

  • @thebatmon
    @thebatmon 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's awesome that Asianometry didn't go the usual route of simply blaming the middle eastern countries for their unsustainable usage. He gives reasons as to why they do it and how they're slowly trying to transition, while also mentioning why these countries need to switch to more decentralised plants for national security requirements

  • @wmchan44
    @wmchan44 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    In the Middle East, fresh clean potable water to WHO standards are more precious than oil.
    It should not be given free to the public but charged at a cost plus price for them to appreciate it's value.

    • @jihadalsweed
      @jihadalsweed 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is not free

  • @KidneyBicep
    @KidneyBicep 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:30 to 11:10 , FYI mechanical energy isn't a term used. Electricity or high pressure gas is used as an energy carrier. The carrier then ties into a motor, to make things spin, or a similar concept if using high pressure gas. Hence, most people use electricity consumption instead of "mechanical energy" . Also, 15% of oil production going to a cogeneration plant likely has a huge component of domestic electricity consumption, and heat for other industries. It's not right to associate it with water without mention of the other things.

  • @TheGreatAtario
    @TheGreatAtario 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    There are so many mispronunciations today I despair of calling them out

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well Arabic does involve a lot of sounds that don't exist in English.

    • @TheGreatAtario
      @TheGreatAtario 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@doujinflip I wouldn't even know of the Arabic mispronunciations…

    • @MikeAlabbasi
      @MikeAlabbasi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *YES!!!*
      For starters, 🇧🇭 Bahrain, it's only two syllables, just simply go Ba-Rain, that's it.
      I actually live there, and never in my life have I heard someone mispronouncing it.

  • @wds9861
    @wds9861 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What ground water would you contaminate if you are getting your water from the ocean?

  • @Ansset0
    @Ansset0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    1:15 average household, 2+2 model, uses 113 M3 per annum. What the heck is the problem here? If country has 30+ per capita, on average, WTF are you or them complaining about?
    Gulf area should not be allowed to govern itself. 🤮
    Let them dry.

  • @Nick2Stix
    @Nick2Stix 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    won't it just not matter if brine poisons the groundwater because we can just keep desalinating ocean water?

  • @Jupa
    @Jupa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The UAE is basically Elon Musk if he were a state.
    Tasteless, trashy, wasteful and simple minded… but at least they’re rich. For better or worse.

  • @zombiebullshark3834
    @zombiebullshark3834 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Would it be energy efficient to use pumps to lower the vapor pressure above the sea water to lower the boiling temp instead of raising the elevation?

  • @AlbatrossCommando
    @AlbatrossCommando 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Israel (who also uses a lot of desalination) has a big advantage on the brine disposal front as they just dump it into the dead sea (refelling it in the process).

    • @shh13100
      @shh13100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They don't do that. It's been proposed but never done

    • @DioTheGreatOne
      @DioTheGreatOne 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh no, you said the I word. Prepare for attacks.

  • @GarC170
    @GarC170 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saudi owned farms in Arizona recently had their ground water leases revoked by the state. Those farms grew most of SAs cattle feed. They’re hurting even harder for ground water now

  • @agxryt
    @agxryt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Panacea: Pan - uh - say - uh

    • @simonedaniel
      @simonedaniel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Incorrect, it is Pan - uh - *see* - uh

    • @agxryt
      @agxryt 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@simonedaniel I read that, and thought "yeah, that's what I said, and had to re-read my original comment, and realized I've heard it said both ways."
      Gonna look it up. It's definitely NOT "pan ass ey uh" tho hahaha e: you were right! Shut down the internet!

    • @sassa82
      @sassa82 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Persian Gulf❤

  • @davidliddelow5704
    @davidliddelow5704 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You mentioned the thermal brine comes out hot? I imagine it would save energy to use the hot outgoing liquids to preheat the intake water.

  • @AnirudhTammireddy
    @AnirudhTammireddy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    9:03 sponge balls in these square plants

    • @atcengineering
      @atcengineering 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I had quite a chuckle at that one!!!

  • @CrackDavidson1
    @CrackDavidson1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder if MSF is best paired with high temp nuclear power plants. Then electrolysis of the brine (also using waste heat from the nuclear power and MSF) to create H2, Cl2, NaOH and the industrial products you can produce from these seems like the best bet. I have no clue about the economics tho. But this combination seems like the best bet in efficiency and profit, but needs to be designed as a cohesive whole.

  • @ligius3
    @ligius3 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I visited the Red Sea a few years ago. The levels are rapidly dropping and the sea will probably cease to exist in 80 years. Not to mantion the rising salt levels. It's funny because there are two contrasting things at play: the desalination plants dumping brine and the salt processing plants that just evaporate water into the air. The countries there are all fighting each other for water and shorting the other guys, while cooperation would clearly benefit everyone instead, like the prisoner's dilema.

    • @MaxPower-11
      @MaxPower-11 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The Red Sea is not an inland sea. It’s connected to the Indian Ocean in the South and the Mediterranean Sea (via the Suez Canal) in the North. As such, there’s no chance of it disappearing.

  • @mrlithium69
    @mrlithium69 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @9:39 I've seen that picture before in one of your videos. I remember the distinctive 80s car.

  • @ShumaBot
    @ShumaBot 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Or just don't overpopulate an arid desert.

    • @michaelmoorrees3585
      @michaelmoorrees3585 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Those oil rich countries need the labor to build their skyscrapers, and then keep them clean. When the oil money dries up, I don't wan to be anywhere near that "political fallout" !

    • @kapilchhabria1727
      @kapilchhabria1727 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Stop talking logic to fools who built on reclaimed land when they have endless desert land to build on.

    • @DioTheGreatOne
      @DioTheGreatOne 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@kapilchhabria1727Desert sand is terrible for foundations.

    • @LolTollhurst
      @LolTollhurst 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This sounds like what europeans say about america

    • @joez.2794
      @joez.2794 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Why would they do that when we pay them so handsomely so we can all drive to work, alone? All they're doing is turning something they have too much of, into something they don't have enough of.

  • @ronaryel6445
    @ronaryel6445 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A very good video - but as to your conclusion, flip the question: Is it better to have a few areas where brine disturbs the local ecosystem and saving most pristine areas, rather than many areas where the brine has to be dealt with?

  • @Ansset0
    @Ansset0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Some nations should not exist.

    • @poisedforduty
      @poisedforduty 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So BOMB BOMB AWAY???

    • @Ansset0
      @Ansset0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@poisedforduty have I said anything about violence? Your over interpretation is disgusting 🤮

    • @poisedforduty
      @poisedforduty 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @Ansset0 who are you to judge what nations should exist or not? And of course your kind of attitude leads to war

    • @موسى_7
      @موسى_7 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      As an Iraqi, I agree. Saudi is nothing but trouble. Let's restore the Ottoman Empire.

    • @موسى_7
      @موسى_7 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      All Saudis should migrate to a country which can sustain their population. A country with farmland and water which can turn into bread and vegetables for them to eat. The desert is overpopulated, and the only jobs which exist there are related to the unsustainable oil industry.

  • @napalmholocaust9093
    @napalmholocaust9093 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Never a fair comparison to pit any county's policies to the artificial result of the one child disaster.

  • @gianpaulgraziosi6171
    @gianpaulgraziosi6171 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    17:07 I’m American. 😂

  • @getreal2977
    @getreal2977 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yes, the brine can't get back into the ocean for obvious reasons and not underground to protect drinking water.
    I wonder if they could build a pipeline to dump the brine into the hottest and most desolate deserts and let the sun evaporate the water and let the remaining salt accumulate? It would be less hazardous then the former mentioned methods even it's not a perfect solution.

    • @floycewhite6991
      @floycewhite6991 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They already pump seawater into oil fields to force out the remaining oil. Brine could easily go there.

  • @universeisundernoobligatio3283
    @universeisundernoobligatio3283 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why are populations allowed to grow in places with no water? Such a delicate water source to support so many people.

    • @موسى_7
      @موسى_7 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's what I'm thinking. As an Iraqi, I'm thinking the Saudi population is going to cause a strain on resources. Unlike Iraq, Saudi doesn't have enough farmland to sustain its population, because it doesn't have rivers.

    • @edwinhuang9244
      @edwinhuang9244 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I'm pretty sure it's because historically those places did get enough water from the groundwater to sustain their population and population growth.
      And if they didn't, the places just disappear.

    • @jatpack3
      @jatpack3 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Allowed? Are you going to control free people and tell them where they are permitted to live? While you are on a tyrannical power trip you should go to china and order them to stop using coal, immediately.

    • @universeisundernoobligatio3283
      @universeisundernoobligatio3283 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jatpack3
      Nature has always taken care of infestations, Disease, famine and drought have always worked in the past to reduce the size of an infestation.

    • @MikeAlabbasi
      @MikeAlabbasi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      As a local from 🇧🇭 Bahrain, I confirm Edwin's comment, it's literally what happened.
      Through history, people in the area used to get water from natural springs and water wells, back then the water consumption wasn't as high as it is nowadays, an issue which was caused not only due to the rapid growth in population; but it's also because the fact that people's lifestyle and habits have changed through the years.

  • @HamishBarker
    @HamishBarker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your channel is excellent. Really enjoying the long form tech stuff. I did thermodynamoc design on large multi effect distillation and power generation plants built in Bahrain.multi effect is similar to multi stage flash, the main difference is where the evaporation ( and scale) occurs. From memory, typical desal output was about 10x the kg rate of input low grade steam. The ste was from back end of steam turbine process. Process control, very very large low pressure comtrol valves, safety systems ( burst discs rather than giant safety valves) and seawater corrosion were challenges.